Linux-Networking Digest #253, Volume #11 Sun, 23 May 99 13:13:43 EDT
Contents:
problem with FWTK ("Maguai")
Re: DEC depca ethernet card recognized by Linux? (Georg Schwarz)
Re: STAROFFICE INSTALL (John Oliver)
IP Masquerade/Routing (Athol Marshall)
Re: Problem with Wu.FTPD (Lim Chuan Wee)
Error ipchains (Matthias Kihr)
Re: Virus scanning mail server for BSD or Linux ("Alan Broderick")
Small private network woes - Still not working (James R. Barnett, Jr.)
Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes ("Gene Heskett")
Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes (Clifford Kite)
Re: Problems detecting mca ethernetcard(3c529) on IBM PS2 (Tim Bourne)
set different route for port no. 80 request?? ("Sun Ju")
can't telnet to m own machine (marcus holmes)
NFS mount problem. (Thierry Sengstag)
Re: Redirection using ipchains? ("Ryan Smith")
I need a straight answer now ! please... (peter)
Re: LINUX AND MS PROXY SERVER ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DEC depca ethernet card recognized by Linux? (John Oliver)
Re: denying access to certain websites ("Doug Pitek")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem with FWTK
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 14:54:01 GMT
Hello.
I have installed RH5.2 and FWTK.
Has anybody successfully installed and configured plug-gw?
I'm trying to install SMTP proxy on Linux box with plug-gw.
Can anybody supply full example?
Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Schwarz)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: DEC depca ethernet card recognized by Linux?
Date: 23 May 1999 14:56:18 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver) writes:
>Sure! Throw that old POS away and buy a new card? ;-)
>Seriously, why would you want to screw around with that prehistoric
>NIC?
because it's easier to use that one than to go and buy a new one. I now
found that all it took was to include depca support in the kernel (pretty
obvious, but I seemed to have been on the wrong track because of that
AM7990/Lance thing). I just booted the new kernel, and it's autodetected,
works on the spot. NFS and amd are fine with it. A quick test gave me a
download speed of 210 kByte/s. Should be enough for a 386DX25 with MFM
disks :-).
So, seriously, why should I want to screw around with a new NIC?
(which, if it is a cheap one, might not even be jumper configurable) :-)
BTW, your newsreader seems misconfigured as far as your address is
concerned.
--
Georg Schwarz ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP 2.6ui)
Institut f�r Theoretische Physik +49 30 314-24254 FAX -21130 IRC kuroi
Technische Universit�t Berlin http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver)
Subject: Re: STAROFFICE INSTALL
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 14:59:41 GMT
On Sat, 22 May 1999 21:26:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony
DiChiacchio) wrote:
>I'M TRYING TO INSTALL STAROFFICE 3.1 - WHEN I TRY TO RUN THE SETUP PROGRAM I
>GET ERROR "CAN'T LOAD LIBRARY 'LIBXM.SO.2'
. I'M NEW TO LINUX AND
>COULD USE SOME HELP. THANKS.
Your CapsLock key is broken. Time for a new keyboard...
------------------------------
From: Athol Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerade/Routing
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 17:03:48 +0100
I have set-up Linux in order to replace a Cisco router. (I need
IP masquerading to multiple locations, and Cisco only supports it for 2
locations). Other routers only support up to 8 and they're overpriced.
I've got IP masquerading working over diald/PPP/ISDN to the Internet.
I'm now about to set-up the routes for the various other networks I need
to access.
Here's the problem.
My clients are very badly behaved and have network addresses in use
which may be on the Internet somewhere. ie they're not using private
IP addresses.
e.g. one of them uses 128.100.0.0, which for all I know may exist
somewhere else.
If I route 128.100.0.0 via PPP to my client, and I then need to access
the "real" 128.100.0.0 for some reason, it clearly won't work.
Is there anyway I can alias my client's network address so that I could
pretend it was say 172.16.0.0 and have the IP addresses translated
before passing packets to PPP?
e.g. a host at the other end has IP address 128.100.254.3
I would define it in my hosts file or NIS as 172.16.254.3
I would define a route to 172.16.0.0 via a diald/PPP interface.
The kernel would translate the 172.16 into 128.100 for me, so the router
at the other end would forward the packet correctly.
If this is not currently possible, can anyone point me to the
appropriate kernel modules so I can try and code it myself?
I realise that the proper solution would be to use private IP addresses,
but this is something I have no control over.
thanks for any tips/advice,
--
======================================================================
Athol Marshall, Superior Programming Power Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
======================================================================
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 22:57:31 +0800
From: Lim Chuan Wee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem with Wu.FTPD
Hi,
What you want is probably the chroot environment. This will let a ftp
user see only his own directory. He will not be able to get up to any
directory above his own.
You can get the info on setting this up on the man pages for ftpd and
ftpaccess.
Good luck.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 17:22:56 +0200
From: Matthias Kihr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Error ipchains
After update (suse 6.0 to 61) I have the following Error in the startup
script for the masquerading:
ipchains - Protocol unavailable
Alle masq. modules are loaded and forwarding is aktivated.
Who can help???
Matthias
------------------------------
From: "Alan Broderick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Virus scanning mail server for BSD or Linux
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 07:35:27 +0100
Hello
There are native FreeBSD and Linux versions of Sophos Anti-Virus.
For more information please see www.sophos.com or mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan
Sophos Plc
>We would like to add the facility for virus checking of all email that goes
>in and out of our servers. I've looked into this and found several
>SMTP-based products for Windows NT, and a couple for Solaris, but I can't
>find any that would run on my current FreeBSD servers
------------------------------
From: James R. Barnett, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Small private network woes - Still not working
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 11:12:32 -0500
Hi,
I appreciate all the help I have gotten but I still can't seem to find
the problem. I am desparate and frustrated. If anyone could lookover the output
of these commands and could post some suggestions, I would be very grateful.
here is the output of route -n by arson (192.168.1.1):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
208.128.7.17 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 208.128.7.17 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 8 ppp0
here is ifconfig:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:0B:50:2F
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:208.128.7.90 P-t-P:208.128.7.17 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:342 errors:1 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:318 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Memory:12ec038-12ecc04
here is the output of route -n by tireiron (192.168.1.2):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 144 eth0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 5 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 15 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 26 eth0
Here is the ifconfig for tireiron:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:104337 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:104337 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:0C:9E:1C
inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:258 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
Please, please, PLEASE help if you can. I have been working on this
considerably every day for a week and feel like I am getting nowhere.
Thanks in advance,
James
------------------------------
Date: 23 May 99 11:48:31 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warning, long post, blame it on lack of published docs/information.
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Kris ;
[...]
> Nope - I don't have default-asyncmap anywhere in my PPP options
> files
> (/etc/ppp/options & /etc/ppp/peers/provider, I believe). I have also
> tried various other things, but I just get lots of asyncmap things
> (I'm not very technical with PPP) when I choose PAP authentication:
And I'll snip the rest of this, because I suspect you've already given
us the clue.
In the linuxconf screen, goto 'Client tasks', then to 'PPP/SLIP/PLIP'
and click on the 'ppp0' that comes up in the right window, where you
should see under the 'Hardware' tab, entries for your interface speed,
and device, and probably a blank textwindow for 'PPP Options'
Fill this window in with 'asyncmap 0x000a0000' including the single
quotes.
'Accept', that, which will close that window, and 'quit' the next shown
window.
Now grab the slider and pulldown to see 'Control PPP/SLIP/PLIP Links'
and follow your nose to get a requester to put it online, and do so,
while switching back to a shell and watching the log with 'tail -f
/var/log/messages'. Its should show you requested, and they ack'ed,
that asyncmap setting, and it shouldn't lock up.
ppp0 and such are 'character' devices, and as such normally respond to
the common xon/xoff control sequence. These control sequences *must* be
'escaped', or hidden from the system else it will do just that, think
that one of the binary characters it just received is an xoff from the
remote system, so it stops sending until it gets an xon from that remote
system, which it probably never gets.
The 'asyncmap' option is a single long word, each bit of which
represents a character value to be escaped, and then recovered at the
far end. There are 32 bit positions in this long, representing the
first 32 character positions of an ascii character map. Setting its
value to 0x000a0000 sets the two bits that will result in the xon/xoff
sequence being 'encoded' if you will, and decoded at the other end,
thereby preventing path lockups caused by the otherwise normal responses
to the xon/xoff protocol.
> Again, default-asyncmap isn't anywhere in my config files. If I knew
> how to grep every file on my system for it then I would (manpages
> are so cryptic sometimes).
I agree violently, and please pardon my profanity in the next paragraph
or 2.
The whole damned 800+ page RH5.2 Unleashed manual mentions it once, but
gives absolutely no (findable) definition as to just what the hell it
does. IMO, anything that *is* a protocol requirement, also needs a full
explanation and _anything_ less is assuming the user is at least a cs
graduate with 20 years of real world programming under his hat. RedHat,
SuSE, Slackware et all, all *assume* the user who picks up a copy of
linux, any version, is already a /Guru/. I'm sure not, even when there
is nobody else in the room!
Until they 'get over it', and start including a bit of _real world info_,
linux is going to maintain its bitchy, contackerous, hard to configure,
reputation and will remain just an interesting sideline at best for the
general public. It will *not* be a M$ killer until such time as the
average bloke walking down the street can open up the manual and look up
in the glossary and get, a full explanation for every option he can see
being tried in the log messages.
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040 50 megs fast/2 megs chip
Ch. Eng. @ WDTV-5 |A2091,GuruRom,1g Seagate,CDROM,Multiface III
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or |Buddha + 4 gig WDC drive, 525 meg tape
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|Stylus Pro, EnPrint, Picasso-II, 17" vga
RC5-Moo! 22kkeys/sec isn't much, but it all helps
--
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes
Date: 23 May 1999 10:20:29 -0500
Kris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: >Moreover you've done something that I didn't realize was possible, you
: >caused pppd to reject the "asyncmap" requested by the peer. On reviewing
: >man pppd for ppp-2.3.8 it seems that the pppd default-asyncmap option
: >must have been used to do that. I don't know what possible reason one
: >could have to configure for this, although I'll certainly admit there
: >might be one. But not likely in any ordinary ISP connection.
: Nope - I don't have default-asyncmap anywhere in my PPP options files
: (/etc/ppp/options & /etc/ppp/peers/provider, I believe). I have also
: tried various other things, but I just get lots of asyncmap things (I'm
: not very technical with PPP) when I choose PAP authentication:
You're right. Rereading the man pages it looks like the way the asyncmap
option itself is implemented has changed - again - from 2.3.7 to 2.3.8.
Sigh. BTW the best thing to do to solve asyncmap problems is to match
the asyncmap the ISP is using, here "asyncmap a0000". Some ISPs have
a broken PPP implementation w.r.t. asyncmap.
: >rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x50 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
:<accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb1878299> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x50 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
:<accomp>]
: >rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x51 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
:<accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x51 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
:<accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb1878299> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb1878299> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xb1878299]
: >sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x6 user="dufas" password="mypasswordhere"]
: (quoted there's no word wrapping... Agent's fault)
: All of that's then repeated lots of times (apparently indefinitely).
Without any PAP AuthNak from the ISP? The peer and pppd are able to
communicate during the initial LCP negotiations. When this happens and
authentication fails it's frequently solved by the asyncmap matching
trick described above.
: With normal chatscript authentication, I get things like:
: >Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
: >sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x20 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x20 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x21 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x21 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: >sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xac3d9a48]
: >sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
: >rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0xc7898b3]
: >rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr 195.147.132.201>]
: >sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr 195.147.132.201> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
: >rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr 195.147.132.201> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
: >rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0xeb <compress VJ 0f 00> <addr 195.147.128.4>]
: >sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0xeb <compress VJ 0f 00> <addr 195.147.128.4>]
: >local IP address 195.147.132.201
: >remote IP address 195.147.128.4
: .... followed by no packets going anywhere.
This is often a sign that you *have* to do PAP or CHAP authentication.
: >You also have noccp as a pppd option.
: Nope. I must've had PPP compiled into the kernel at that time (CCP
: compressors apparently only work as a module). Note that modules make no
: difference to anything.
Right again. My needs are fairly small so I compile most everything
into the kernel and tend to forget about modules.
I've assumed that you used essentially the same scripts in 2.0.36 and so
have the defaultroute option in place. The same with resolv.conf. And
you're confident that the IRQ configured for the modem's device file
is correct?
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Better is the enemy of good enough. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Bourne)
Subject: Re: Problems detecting mca ethernetcard(3c529) on IBM PS2
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:16:52 GMT
On Wed, 19 May 1999 11:53:46 +0200, "Jon Finanger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Anyone who knows how to detect my 3com (3c529) ethernetcard on my IBM PS2
>machine(486/58)?
>(I've RedHat 6.0)
Make sure you've got MCA support built-in to the kernel [I suspect
that the RH6.0 supplied kernel doesn't have this, so you'll probably
have to compile your own], and use the 3c509 module - the card will be
probed for io and irq parameters.
I'm using a 3c529 in a 56slc with DosLinux80, and it works OK.
------------------------------
From: "Sun Ju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: set different route for port no. 80 request??
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 00:23:42 +0800
I want to set the 80 port request to different gateway, since I have two
internet connections.
I want to use one internet connection for http request (port number 80) and
smtp (port number 25) to one internet connection, while all other request
will be routed to another internet connection. Can I do this with linux?
This linux box will be used as a router.
Send me a e-mail if any of you guys got any idea at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Sun Ju.
------------------------------
From: marcus holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: can't telnet to m own machine
Date: 23 May 1999 16:20:09 GMT
Hi Guys,
Weird problem here. I can't telnet to my own machine. This is what happens when I try
the following:
telnet localhost = unable to connect to remote host (connection refused)
telnet 127.0.0.1 = same as above
telnet diehard (my machine name, set in hosts) = network is unreachable
Odd problem. So under netcfg in X, I have the following configuration:
Under tab NAMES: Hostname is diehard
Under tab HOSTS: diehard 192.168.0.1
einstein 192.168.0.2
localhost 127.0.0.1
(diehard is the linux box, einstein is my 98 machine)
Under tab INTERFACES:
Interface lo IP is 127.0.0.1 PROTO None ATBOOT Yes ACTIVE YES
Interface etho IP is 192.168.0.1 PROTO None ATBOOT YES Active Yes
And under Route I have nothing.
I can ping the linux box from my 98 machine, but not ftp:
C:\WINDOWS>ping 192.168.0.1
Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms
C:\WINDOWS>ftp 192.168.0.1
> ftp: connect :10061
ftp>
So the network sees the machine... any ideas here guys?
Marcus
------------------------------
From: Thierry Sengstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.hp.hpux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: NFS mount problem.
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 18:36:36 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm trying to mount filesystems across two networks via NFS,
but I have some problems...
The two systems involved are :
- a HP-UX 10.20 workstation (helena) which address is 128.178.nn.nn
- a Linux 2.0.36 PC (homer) which address is 195.112.nn.nn
I can mount both the filesystems I want to share locally via the
loopback address (127.0.0.1). I can also mount the filesystem of
helena on a sister workstation on the same subnet (128.178...), but
I could not mount filesystems between helena and homer.
Below is a copy of the error messages I get (with rpcinfo summary).
Since I'm quite new in the NFS business, what would you suggest to me
?
(For info my hosts.allow and hosts.deny are empty on my Linux system
and 'pinging' one system from the other gives round-trip time of about
200 ms [thus no timeout problem].)
Any help welcome,
Thierry Sengstag
= = = ERROR MESSAGES = = =
On the Linux side (homer), I get the following messages :
# mount -t nfs helena:/helena/share /mnt_ext/helena
mount clntudp_create: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Timed out
# rpcinfo -p
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100005 1 udp 681 mountd
100005 2 udp 681 mountd
100005 1 tcp 684 mountd
100005 2 tcp 684 mountd
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
545580417 1 udp 684 bwnfsd
545580417 1 tcp 686 bwnfsd
On the HP-UX side (helena), I get the following ones :
# mount homer:/homer/share /mnt_ext/homer
mount: homer server not responding: RPC_PMAP_FAILURE -
RPC_PMAP_FAILURE
# rpcinfo -p
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100005 1 udp 606 mountd
100005 1 tcp 608 mountd
100021 1 tcp 609 nlockmgr
100021 1 udp 2494 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 613 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 2495 nlockmgr
100020 1 udp 2496 llockmgr
100020 1 tcp 618 llockmgr
100021 2 tcp 621 nlockmgr
100024 1 udp 610 status
100024 1 tcp 612 status
------------------------------
From: "Ryan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redirection using ipchains?
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:40:34 GMT
I am in the very same situation! I've been looking for a way to redirect an
incoming web connection to my gateway box to a web server running on my
local network. If somebody knows something about this, please let me know!
Ryan
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7i6ulc$er0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Am I missing something in ipchains? I would like to do redirection of
> certain packets from another machine to a given port on another machine
> on my network. Not masquerade, not port forwarding to a port on my
> machine, just a general rewrite capability. The REDIRECT facility
> doesn't seem to handle going to a remote host.
>
> For example, connections to port 80 from a network would go to port 3100
> on another machine, possibly on another network.
>
> I am *not* looking for other ways to do this, I have several, I just
> want to know if this capability is really missing, and I'd rather not
> wade through the network code to see if I could do it using my own
> ioctls or whatever. I did look at the code briefly, it didn't jump out
> at me.
>
> --
> bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
> One common problem is mistyping an email address and creating another
> valid, though unintended, recipient. Always check the recipient's
> address carefully when sending personal information, such as credit
> card numbers, death threats or offers of sexual services.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (peter)
Subject: I need a straight answer now ! please...
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:26:11 GMT
Modems, I want to know if I can use two modems with linux and how will
it work ???
I'm doing in windows with a program called Midcore Teamer, my ip
doesn't support two modems, but with the teamer program it works (FTP
and HTTP). How does linux "team" the modems.
Trust me, I would try, but right now I only have one normal modem and
a winmodem, another normal modem is on it's way.
peter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LINUX AND MS PROXY SERVER
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:34:15 GMT
How about if the proxy program is WinProxy (running on Win98)? I can
use netscape but I can't even telnet from my linux box because of the
proxy server. Is there a way to use my other network programs that
don't take proxy information?
-sara
In article <dbN13.37869$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to use so called "transparent" proxying. It's described in
Proxy
> server documentation or on http://support.microsoft.com/support
>
> Good luck
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7i4qkb$jp8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Does anyone know how to get the entire TCP/IP of linux to go though
MS
> >Proxy?
> >
> >Carlos
> >
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Gaetan Paquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> "Michael D. Underwood" wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am in a situation where I have to have a LINUX box behind a
> >Microsoft
> >> > Proxy Server. I would like to have the capablity of geting to
the
> >WWW on
> >> > this :LINUX box through MS Proxy. Can someone please tell me how
to
> >do
> >> > this???
> >> >
> >> > Any help would be appreciated.
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> You should'nt have any problems going through the web proxy
> >(application
> >> proxy)
> >> all you have to do is to fill in the info ( ip address and port #)
in
> >the
> >> "going through a proxy" section of the
> >> web bowser you are using.... That's all.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> >---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: DEC depca ethernet card recognized by Linux?
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:47:17 GMT
On 23 May 1999 14:56:18 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg
Schwarz) wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver) writes:
>
>>Sure! Throw that old POS away and buy a new card? ;-)
>
>>Seriously, why would you want to screw around with that prehistoric
>>NIC?
>
>because it's easier to use that one than to go and buy a new one. I now
>found that all it took was to include depca support in the kernel (pretty
>obvious, but I seemed to have been on the wrong track because of that
>AM7990/Lance thing). I just booted the new kernel, and it's autodetected,
>works on the spot. NFS and amd are fine with it. A quick test gave me a
>download speed of 210 kByte/s. Should be enough for a 386DX25 with MFM
>disks :-).
Very good then! Your first sentence gave me a start, though, given
the problem you were having... :-)
>So, seriously, why should I want to screw around with a new NIC?
>(which, if it is a cheap one, might not even be jumper configurable) :-)
AAMOF, I haven't seen a NIC with jumpers for *quite* some time... new
or otherwise.
>BTW, your newsreader seems misconfigured as far as your address is
>concerned.
Nope, it's properly configured! I don't get any spam this way. And I
like to keep all my Usenet discussions in Usenet.
------------------------------
From: "Doug Pitek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: denying access to certain websites
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 10:53:14 -0400
see if your ISP have a proxy server on his side for porn.. mine has one
called net filter.. where you bounce all your traffic through his port 81
and it dedices wheather or not to get that page...
Tom Elsesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am setting up a RH5.2 linux machine in my childrens school as an
> http server and also ip forwarding for internet access. The principal
> is wary of the kids abusing the internet, gettting access to sites
> they should not be allowed to view (it's a K-8 parochial school).
> While I have the server set up for dial out and ipforwarding, I don't
> know how to keep them from viewing the undesirable sites. I have used
> /etc/hosts.deny and hosts.allow for individual ip's, but that seems to
> be quite a daunting task to find *all* the sex sites and put them into
> a file. What would be the best way for me to go about this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Tom
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
