Linux-Networking Digest #251, Volume #11 Sun, 23 May 99 07:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: routing ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: need help ppp setup ("Greg")
-=what can you do with 2 pcs?=- (jane chav)
Kingston KNE100TX Ethernet cards and Linux (John Winters)
Re: DSL sharing on home LAN? (Richard Steiner)
Re: eth0:0 not showing on ifconfig - puzzled (sven vahar)
need help ppp setup ("Nesman")
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC (Vidar Andresen)
with ipchains cannot login via xdm window (Zenon Fortuna)
where is named? (urgrue)
Re: host.allow and host.deny config help Please ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: What's a cable modem... really? (Tom Rockwell)
Re: -=what can you do with 2 pcs?=- (Olaf Walkowiak)
DSL sharing on home LAN? ("Anthaam")
Re: Secondary DNS ("Curt")
Re: Measuring quality of service of network connection ("Curt")
Re: host.allow and host.deny config help Please ("Curt")
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC ("Curt")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:02:36 -0700
Hello!
As far as pop3 goes I would recommend downloading and compiling qualcomm's
pop3 serv from http://www.qualcomm.com called popper.
It works great!
As far as routing, read howtos on net3 also ip forwarding.
Good luck
Nick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to set up my 486/66, 20 meg ram to be a router and mail server.
>I am getting a 56k modem fairly soon, but I need to know how to set up
>the software end first. I am running RedHat 6.0, and I can't figure out
>the routing stuff at all. The mail server end should supposedly work
>now. I edited the inetd.conf file and uncommented the line that had the
>"pop3d" tag on it, but I still can't get authentication.
>
>--Nick
>
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need help ppp setup
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 04:23:20 -0400
Have you set your pap secrets file as per manual. It looks like your ISP
is wanting a pap login. You may need to take out both login name
and password out of your script to start pppd and let pap do the
work.
Greg.
Nesman wrote in message <7i8ak3$bo9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>May 22 22:06:54 hood chat[11085]: send ( ogin: mylogin assword: mypwd dc^M)
>May 22 22:06:54 hood pppd[11084]: Serial connection established.
>May 22 22:06:55 hood pppd[11084]: Using interface ppp0
>May 22 22:06:55 hood pppd[11084]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
>May 22 22:06:55 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
>0xe9636845> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 22 22:06:58 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
>0xe9636845> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
><asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x24b93089> <pcomp> <accomp> <auth pap>]
>nesman
------------------------------
From: jane chav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: -=what can you do with 2 pcs?=-
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 17:17:47 +1000
hi, got 2 pcs and 2 SMC NICs, want to make the most out of them, so
please feel free to add to the list, cheers
1. IP Masq
2. File/printer sharing
3. playing games
4. one for work, one for experimenting
5. look good :)
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Winters)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Kingston KNE100TX Ethernet cards and Linux
Date: 23 May 1999 09:32:28 +0100
Somebody asked the other day about Ethernet cards but I'm afraid I've
lost the message. A word of warning about Kingston KNE100TX cards.
I've been using these for some time and they were great under Linux.
However, the latest pair I've received have had one of those nasty
hidden upgrades, and it seems they no longer work at either 10 or 100
Mbit.
My working cards identify themselves as:
DEC DC21140 (Rev 34)
and the new non-functional ones are:
DEC DC21141 (Rev 65)
If anyone's got any pointers on how to get these going I'd be very
grateful, but in the meantime I would avoid Kingston's Ethernet cards.
John
--
John Winters. Wallingford, Oxon, England.
The Linux Emporium - a source for Linux CDs in the UK
See <http://www.polo.demon.co.uk/emporium.html>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: DSL sharing on home LAN?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 08:48:42 GMT
Here in comp.os.linux.networking, Anthaam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake unto us, saying:
>I'm working on setting up a home network. I have an 8 port fast hub and
>Etherexpress pro 100 management adapters in the 5 systems I have.
Sounds very similar to the setup I have -- three big machines with Intel
EEPro/100B adapters, one smaller machine with a pair of NE2000's, and a
single 8-port hub.
>I'm getting DSL next month and was wondering how I would put the DSL
>modem on the network? In a single computer environment, a the DSL modem
>is connected via NIC to the computer and it gives you access. Should I
>make the system what will have the DSL modem the gateway and put two NICs
>in that PC such that on one segment I have the home network and the other
>has the DSL modem?
You can do that (that's what I'm doing with the Cisco 675 that USWest
gave me). I use my little 486 box as a gateway, and it is linked to
the ADSL router via ethernet and also to the hub.
Another option (if you have a Cisco 675 which is capable of using its
internal NAT software, i.e. not in "bridging mode") is to use the ADSL
router itself as a gateway. But I don't know your specific situation.
>My question is just on procedure. How do i do this?
If you want to use one box as a gateway, you would use Linux and IP
Masquerading (which is a specialized NAT implementation specific to
Linux) to translate packets going in/out of your local LAN.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then
------------------------------
From: sven vahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eth0:0 not showing on ifconfig - puzzled
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 10:40:09 +0300
> | ifconfig ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> | route add -host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx dev eth0:0
>
> ifconfig eth0:0 x.x.x.x
sorry for mistake. i _did_ do ifconfig eth0:0 x.x.x.x, somehow
carelessly wrote here double. but still - even suggested ifconfig -a
does not show but one eth0 address. and - they do work... i have set up
10 virtual hosts with apache and all works perfectly - except those IP
aliases showing... since i have had no problems with actually using them
i am not very worried but still slightly puzzled.
when i do ifconfig eth0:0 then it shows the alias correctly.
and - i do not have /proc/net/aliases at all...
surely there must be something i have done... not quite right?
sven
------------------------------
From: "Nesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: need help ppp setup
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:27:19 -0700
hi,
can't complete conn something about "No network protocols running", ppp log
follows:
May 22 22:06:33 hood pppd[11084]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
May 22 22:06:34 hood chat[11085]: send (AT^M)
May 22 22:06:34 hood chat[11085]: expect (OK)
May 22 22:06:34 hood chat[11085]: AT^M^M
May 22 22:06:34 hood chat[11085]: OK
May 22 22:06:34 hood chat[11085]: -- got it
May 22 22:06:34 hood chat[11085]: send (ATDxxxxxxxx^M)
May 22 22:06:35 hood chat[11085]: expect (CONNECT)
May 22 22:06:35 hood chat[11085]: ^M
May 22 22:06:54 hood chat[11085]: ATD2578531^M^M
May 22 22:06:54 hood chat[11085]: CONNECT
May 22 22:06:54 hood chat[11085]: -- got it
May 22 22:06:54 hood chat[11085]: send ( ogin: mylogin assword: mypwd dc^M)
May 22 22:06:54 hood pppd[11084]: Serial connection established.
May 22 22:06:55 hood pppd[11084]: Using interface ppp0
May 22 22:06:55 hood pppd[11084]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
May 22 22:06:55 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0xe9636845> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:06:58 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0xe9636845> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x24b93089> <pcomp> <accomp> <auth pap>]
May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <auth pap>]
May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x24b93089> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <auth chap 05>]
May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x24b93089> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:06:59 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x24b93089> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:07:01 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0xe9636845> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:07:02 hood pppd[11084]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic
0xe9636845> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 22 22:07:02 hood pppd[11084]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0>
<compress VJ 0f 01>]
May 22 22:07:29 hood last message repeated 9 times
May 22 22:07:32 hood pppd[11084]: IPCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
May 22 22:07:32 hood pppd[11084]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network
protocols running"]
May 22 22:07:32 hood pppd[11084]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x4]
May 22 22:07:32 hood pppd[11084]: Connection terminated.
May 22 22:07:32 hood pppd[11084]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
May 22 22:07:32 hood pppd[11084]: Exit.
sorry about the long attachment...some people see every details in these
lines...what am i missing? i think i have protocols 'cuz i can ping...thanks
nesman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 07:08:32 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FoT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Steve Snyder wrote:
[...]
>> #cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
>> ---------------------------------------
>> DEVICE="eth1"
>> IPADDR="24.4.162.173"
>> NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
>> ONBOOT="yes"
>> BOOTPROTO="none"
>
>Both cards are assigned to the same subnet (255.255.255.0), is this
>correct?
Net-3-howto:
For administrative reasons some time early in the development of the
IP protocol some arbitrary groups of addresses were formed into
networks and these networks were grouped into what are called classes.
These classes provide a number of standard size networks that could be
allocated. The ranges allocated are:
----------------------------------------------------------
| Network | Netmask | Network Addresses |
| Class | | |
----------------------------------------------------------
| A | 255.0.0.0 | 0.0.0.0 - 127.255.255.255 |
| B | 255.255.0.0 | 128.0.0.0 - 191.255.255.255 |
| C | 255.255.255.0 | 192.0.0.0 - 223.255.255.255 |
|Multicast| 240.0.0.0 | 224.0.0.0 - 239.255.255.255 |
----------------------------------------------------------
_If_ that is strictly followed the netmask should be 255.0.0.0 on an
'IPADDR="24.4.162.173"'
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zenon Fortuna)
Subject: with ipchains cannot login via xdm window
Date: 23 May 1999 02:15:27 -0700
I have installed the ipchains patch 2.0.34 (to my kernel 2.0.35).
The firewalling seems to work OK, but I have a strange problem when
attempt to login via the xdm window:
After the password is entered, the window blinks only and the login
window comes again.
The /var/log/xdm.log tells that
"X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown)".
Any suggestion how to correct the problem?
TIA,
Zenon
PS.
Seems like the X Window problem, but appeared first after installation of the
ipchains patches.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (urgrue)
Subject: where is named?
Date: 23 May 1999 09:33:14 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i just figured out how to use named.conf when i realized i have an older
version of named that uses named.boot. ive looked all over the place for a new
version of named, but it's nowhere. i even checked the lsm but named is not
where its supposed to be. please help.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: host.allow and host.deny config help Please
Date: 23 May 1999 05:16:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In comp.os.linux.networking Jeff Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: the question is does tcpd understand the * wildcard
Judging from 'man 5 hosts_access', the answer is no. You need
to use an IP/netmask pair to specify a range of addresses. (Somebody
please correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC globbing only applies in shells.)
JD
--
I was thrown out of fourth grade because I couldn't write my own name, and
it's been all downhill from there.
-- Linus Torvalds, in comp.os.mac.advocacy
------------------------------
From: Tom Rockwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What's a cable modem... really?
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 23:27:30 -0400
"D. C. & M. V. Sessions" wrote:
>
> Chris wrote:
> >
> > Ok... we all know a cable modem is a device that uses our cable provider
> > for supposedly high-speed Internet access. But what is a cable modem...
> > really? So far the externel cable modems available today require an
> > ethernet card inside your machine. So I'm wondering... since the cable
> > modem is essentially a network device (or is it?), is it functioning as a
> > router? A bridge? I'm not very savvy on networking, so please excuse my
> > ignorance.
>
> Bridge.
Yes, with some specialized functions. For instance my cable modem will
only talk to 4 devices on the local network.
>
> > The reason why I'm asking is because I'm wondering if it is possible to
> > hook two computers up to an ethernet hub... and have the cable modem as the
> > third device on the hub. In other words, instead of having two ethernet
> > cards in one computer (the one that has the internet connection), each
> > machine would have one card and use the cable modem through the hub. I'm
> > just asking this out of curiosity; I'm not going to try to do this (yet) :)
>
> That depends on whether you want all of you local network traffic
> to show up on the neighborhood cable, and all of the local neighborhood
> cable traffic to show up on your local network. In the first case
> there are some notable security and privacy issues; in the second, it
> depends on whether you want your local network throughput to drop
> whenever your neighbors do a download.
>
If the cable modem is really functioning as a bridge, then local traffic
will stay local and neighborhood traffic will stay on the cable. On my
cable modem, I only see ethernet packets meant for the machines in my
home (including broadcast packets). I'm not sure if all packets from
inside my house get passed out to the cable or not...
I've been messing around a bit with bridging in Linux and found that if
the Linux bridge announces itself to the local network that the cable
modem stops talking to the local network. Also, also the cable modem
makes these same "spanning tree protocal" announcements.
Ofcourse, different cable companies will have different configurations
for their modems, so YMMV.
> --
> | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
> | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
> | for new products or new versions of existing products." |
> +---------- D. C. & M. V. Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------+
------------------------------
From: Olaf Walkowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: -=what can you do with 2 pcs?=-
Date: 23 May 1999 12:37:08 +0200
jane chav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi, got 2 pcs and 2 SMC NICs, want to make the most out of them, so
> please feel free to add to the list, cheers
>
> 1. IP Masq
> 2. File/printer sharing
> 3. playing games
> 4. one for work, one for experimenting
> 5. look good :)
Yeah, try cthugha as a server on one of them and as a client on
the other. Looks great :-)
6. Resource sharing, run programs from one display, some on computer
one, others on computer two.
7. Use one Computer as an X-terminal. As root, try
X -once -query <other-computer>
Make sure X is not running on the Computer where you type this, and
have a graphical login on the other.
8. Experiment with "failover". F.e. if you use one computer as an
webserver (or whatever), the other can check if its still
up and running, if it fails, it takes over the service.
9. Of course you can run servers on each of them. Useful things are:
newsserver (inn or leafnode), scanserver (with sane), smtp and pop
server, ...
10. Build a cluster
There are lots of other things you can do, depending on you knowledge
and interest.
HTH
Olaf
--
ACMEDIA - Cologne - Germany
professional and easy2use e-Commerce Systems
http://www.acmedia.de http://www.buy-world.de
------------------------------
From: "Anthaam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DSL sharing on home LAN?
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 01:32:18 -0700
I'm working on setting up a home network. I have an 8 port fast hub and
Etherexpress pro 100 management adapters in the 5 systems I have. I'm
getting DSL next month and was wondering how I would put the DSL modem on
the network? In a single computer environment, a the DSL modem is connected
via NIC to the computer and it gives you access. Should I make the system
what will have the DSL modem the gateway and put two NICs in that PC such
that on one segment I have the home network and the other has the DSL modem?
My question is just on procedure. How do i do this?
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Secondary DNS
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 05:55:02 -0500
Have you looked at http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO.html ?
UUXX YY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7i6nep$gvm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any body can help to provide information on setting up a 2nd DNS:
> how to configure named.boot and named.conf
>
> As I couldn't make my Redhat work.
> Many thanks,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Measuring quality of service of network connection
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 05:48:27 -0500
MRTG can monitor bandwidth utilization. Comes with RH on contrib CD,
or http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html
Big Brother also might be helpful in monitoring a connection. I might
suggest
you have it monitor the ISP's main gateway(s) (ping monitor that is).
http://maclawran.ca/bb-dnld/
BTW: QoS usually means something pretty specific, and is only available in
some
network medium like ATM.
Anthony D. Tribelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Are there any Linux or FreeBSD tools that measure the quality of service
> of a network connection? We just had DSL installed at work and there are
> often 30 to 45 second 'blackouts' where there is no communication. It's
> not machine specific, all of our machines note the events simultaneously.
> I would like to document these 'blackouts'. I'm thinking of hacking up the
> ping source but I feel that it would be a safe bet that something already
> exists. I wouldn't bet against something already existing in the Linux of
> FreeBSD distribution. Thanks for any info.
>
> Tony
> --
> ------------------
> Tony Tribelli
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: host.allow and host.deny config help Please
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 05:52:17 -0500
You don't need the '*', just have it end in '.'
For example:
ALL: 192.168.1.
will allow all nodes on 192.168.1.0 to access this host, for all tcp wrapped
daemons.
What is leafnode? Is it an application?
You may want to look at man pages.
man hosts.allow
Jeff Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.net...
> i have this as a host.deny file
>
> leafnode: ALL
>
> i have this as a host.allow file
>
> leafnode: 127.0.0.1 #<== local loopback network
> leafnode: 192.168.0.* #<== local ehternet network
> leafnode: 207.203.5.* #<== incomeing internet connections i let
use
> leafnode
>
> the question is does tcpd understand the * wildcard
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 06:14:55 -0500
Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 21 May 1999 23:53:51 -0700, Harley Waagmeester wrote:
>
> >Steve Snyder wrote:
> [snip]
> >IPADDR="24.4.162.173" <-------
> >
> >You have assigned your internet /cable modem address to your eth1 network
card,
> >that won't work.
> >Give your eth1 card a local ip like you have for the eth0 card.
> >I'll give a tough sketch of what needs to happen:
> >if you give eth1 an ip address of 192.168.0.13,
> >Then you need :
> >route add 24.4.162.173 gw 192.168.0.13
> >route add default gw 24.4.162.173
> >
> >I'm probably wrong about the syntax
> >Just give the eth1 a local ip address and leave the gateway address as
> >24.4.162.173,
> >and maybe the startup scripts will set the default route up correctly
> >
> >I hope someone explains this better, or gives the right numbers to plug
into the
> >config files :))
> >
> >The point is that you want a local ip for the eth1 interface card and use
that as
> >the gateway out
> >of the machine, and the default route is a "logical route" that flows
through the
> >hardware route.
> >
> >The 24.4.162.173 is the address of the cable modem device
This is probably the IP for the internet side interface of the cable modem.
What is the IP for the subscriber side of the cable modem? Usually
something like 192.168.0.1 or 10.0.0.1
>
> I followed your advice about, but I'm still seeing the same ping/telnet
> behavior. This is my updated config:
>
> # cat /etc/sysconfig/network
> ------------------------
> NETWORKING=yes
> FORWARD_IPV4=yes
> HOSTNAME="corona.snydernet.lan"
> DOMAINNAME=snydernet.lan
> GATEWAY=24.4.162.173
> GATEWAYDEV=eth1
>
> # /sbin/ifconfig -a
> ----------------
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:9A:82:E5
> inet addr:192.168.0.12 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:531 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:357 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe400
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:C8:01:C8
> inet addr:192.168.0.18 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:354 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe800
Both of your interfaces are on the same subnet. You need to have them on
separate segments, like
192.168.0.0 on one and 192.168.1.0 on the other.
Also 192.168.x.x addresses are not internet routable, so using one of them
for your 'outside' interface won't work unless the cable modem is run a NAT
(similar to IP masq). If cable modem is not running a NAT, you'll need to
get a valid internet address for the 'outside' interface on your system,
from your ISP.
>
> # netstat -nr
> -----------
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
> 192.168.0.12 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0
> 24.4.162.173 192.168.0.18 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0
eth1
> 192.168.0.18 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth1
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
> 0.0.0.0 24.4.162.173 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth1
>
> As before, the attempt to ping @Home's DNS (IP = 24.4.162.33) just hangs.
> Attempting to telnet to the same IP address still gets me this message:
> "Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host"
>
> Does the config info above look ok?
Nope.
>
>
> ***** Steve Snyder *****
>
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
