Linux-Networking Digest #274, Volume #11 Tue, 25 May 99 02:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Switch or Hub, Point-to-Point & Client/Server? (Chameleon)
Re: one simple question ... (Gilford Wimbley)
Re: NIC setup problem ("George Georgakis")
Re: ppp and 'winmodem' (Jackj)
NMB?? (K. PAYNE)
Poor man's port forwarding ("Chris Severn")
Re: PPP headaches (Clifford Kite)
Re: PPP with MSCHAP - hint (Clifford Kite)
Re: NIS/NFS file permissions (Johannes Nix)
Re: networking applications in commercial radio (Jim Richardson)
Re: 3com network problem- stumped ("jamal")
Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's. Can it be done? (Chameleon)
sendmail & pine (Bernd Mau)
Millionth Q about dhcpcd/redhat/@home with some answers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Proxy? Or Firewall? ("Terence Parker")
Samba and NT Domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Samba and NT Domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ipchains and dhcpd server (Louis LeBlanc)
Re: Cannot ping other win95 PCs in same LAN segment (Mohd H Misnan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chameleon)
Subject: Switch or Hub, Point-to-Point & Client/Server?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 00:36:47 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone explain the differences between these (in a few words)
and suggest what I need. I'm setting up a slackware server with a
dialup connection, 1 NT Workstation as a client and 1 98 machine. I
wish to use the printer connected to the Linux server as a print
server and the 95 machine also has a color printer which I may want to
print to from the network. Furthermore, I want to setup sendmail
(also using fetchmail through dialup) on the Linux box as well as an
intranet using apache.
Also, I noticed that some Switches have a main RJ45 jack (for the
server i suppose) and the rest for clients. But I've seen and even
help setup networks were all the machines were connected to one of 4
ports which I assume as point to point and the server port was
connected to a hub then a router to the interent though a csu/dsu &
T1. If someone could explain the differences (see below) here, this
would be most helpful.
Getting serious with Linux and hope to open a networking/consulting
business one day. I've read a lot of books but have little hands on
experience. I've setup sendmail, and fetchmail on a RedHat box, but I
decided to use Slackware for this since I want to use the commandline.
To compliment this network, I would like to purchase a serial terminal
(have no idea where to buy one) and setup it up with catagory 5 and a
RJ45 to serial adapter.
Purpose: If I succeed in this small network using these tools,
perhaps I can deploy small Linux networks for others.
Switch =
Hub=
Point to Point or Client/Server?=
I realize you can give a small network any ip address you want (with
the usual exceptions) but I would like to know the proper Linux way to
do this, keeping in mind that this network may go online one day or
the intranet may double as a secure internet web server (if there is
such a thing;-).
Thanks
Jay
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford Wimbley)
Subject: Re: one simple question ...
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 04:57:55 GMT
On 24 May 1999 04:17:13 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Meling Mudin)
wrote:
>I'm just curious: if I installed Linux (RedHat 6.0) as a standalone
>machine (during the initial installation processes), will I be able
>to make it part of a LAN later on?
>
>-mel
Yes. When you figure out what you want, you can install packages,
recompile the kernel, update configuration files and so on. I think
you can even use Redhat's install program to update later on, without
destroying anything. Good luck!
GW
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <hotmail.com@hurro>
Subject: Re: NIC setup problem
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 04:58:53 GMT
You forgot to add the route. For example, with a 192.168.0.0 network and
your machine being 192.168.0.1, do:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
If you have a gateway to the internet on your LAN, also use the command
route add default gw <gateway address> eth0
to point it thataway.
Stick these route commands in whichever /etc/rc.d/rc.<whatever> file
contains your ifconfig command (I don't do RedHat, so I have no idea which
file it is)
George
===========================================================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
I can be contacted thru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================================
thinh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<7id71o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I am getting some weird errors when try to configure my network card. I
am
> running Linux 5.2 with 2.0.36 kernel. I get the following errors when I
try
> an "ifconfig eth0 <ip addr> netmask <mask> up"
>
> SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
> eth0: unknown interface.
> SIOCSIFNETMASK: Operation not supported by device
> eth0: unknown interface.
>
> However when I go into netcfg, I can enter the information I want. But
the
> interface will not be active when I try a "ifconfig -a". I only get the
> loopback interface.
>
> Any help provided will be appreciated. Thanks in advances.
>
> Thinh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Jackj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp and 'winmodem'
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 20:21:38 -0400
> To repeat: YOU CAN'T USE WINMODEMS WITH LINUX.
or NT or anything other than w95/98.
------------------------------
From: K. PAYNE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NMB??
Date: 25 May 1999 04:38:06 GMT
When I boot, (RH6.0) something called NMB fails, could someone please explain what this
is?
--
__________________________________________________________________
Kenneth Payne
Vice-President Computing and Networking
Union Program Council Technology Instruction Lab.
New Mexico State Univ. 646-5129
(505)646-3235
__________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
From: "Chris Severn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Poor man's port forwarding
Date: 25 May 1999 12:54:12 +0800
Hi.
I'm running a Linux server gateway for a number of Windows computers.
The server acts as the mail server, and is running squid. It is also running
Apache to serve web requests from the outside world, because it is the web
server too.
I'm not running IP masquerading.
It's running Red Hat 5.1 kernel 2.0.34.
The machine is being replaced with something better in a couple of weeks, but
during the waiting period, I'd like to have any connection to port 8000 of the
linux box be redirected to an internal machine 10.1.0.1 port 80.
This is because I want this internal machine to also act as a web server for
some things.
Now, I know that I can use ipportfw or ipmasq or something, but I don't have the
binaries on my system and I think they require a recompile of the kernel (which
I don't have the source to on the system). Too much hassle for a couple of
weeks to obtain the source, recompile the kernel etc. I'd also like the system
to stay up while I'm doing it.
I was wondering if there was an easier way, like having a daemon sitting waiting
for connections on port 8000, and then just establishing a connection to
10.1.0.1 port 80 and pipe all the data to and from it. Is there such an
application around ?
Or, if the daemon could be run from inetd.conf.
I realise there'd be a speed hit, but I don't care too much at the moment.
Or better yet, can squid or Apache or another application which is probably
already on my system do this in some kind of transparent proxy mode by just
changing the configuration files ?
Thanks.
Chris Severn
--
Delete the 'x's to remove the spamblock
Except spammers, for whom my email address is abuse@localhost
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP headaches
Date: 24 May 1999 18:25:01 -0500
Dave Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike wrote:
: >lypolad wrote:
: >>
: >> Don't have many problems configuring PPP but this time, ouch! The scoop is:
: >>......snip much.....
: >> After following Unruh's steps I finally issued the much anticipated command
: >> to get connected:
: >> /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/cua1 57600 debug connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v " AT OK
: >> ATD6782036 CONNECT '\d\c'"
: You got 2 problems... 1) posting too long a log file... you should trim out
: repetitive stuff; 2) you have a quote-mark problem in your pppd command line.
: After the chat -v try 2 single quotes, instead of the one double-quote.
I thought that too, but what is really needed is to replace the second "
with '' .
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP with MSCHAP - hint
Date: 24 May 1999 19:44:53 -0500
bill davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: PPP setup is about ten lines in two plain text files, somehow a GUI
: seems overkill here.
Agreed. In fact to authenticate to just one peer you only need two plain
text files, each containing a single line - one of which is chap-secrets.
I'll have to differ with the statement made in an earlier post that the
remotename option is necessary though. I'm able to connect to two ISPs
using CHAP without it and I can't believe MS-CHAP is any difference in
that regard. Or happens to just be coded differently for MS-CHAP in pppd.
Why would it be needed? The CHAP challenge sent by the peer contains
the hostname for lookup in the second field of chap-secrets.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
------------------------------
From: Johannes Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NIS/NFS file permissions
Date: 25 May 1999 02:43:07 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> we're setting up a linux network.. The user/passwords verify through
> NIS, then it takes the user to that specific home directory.. But after
> that it will not let the user have write access to there home dir.. Nor
> will it let us start Xwindows...
>
possible that you have to set up /etc/exports on the NFS server
machine. Default is read-only. If XWindows uses ~/.Xauthority, this
could be the reasion for failng X as well.
Johannes Nix
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Richardson)
Crossposted-To:
alt.radio,alt.unix,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.sys.novell,comp.unix,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: networking applications in commercial radio
Date: 25 May 1999 03:11:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23 May 1999 22:56:04 -0500,
Tim Ellerbee, in the persona of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
brought forth the following words...:
>Currently, the radio station combo I work for is using incredibly outdated
>hardware and lame software. To wit, the PCs being used are circa 1984 and are
>not even Y2K compliant. The software being used is Broadcast Electronics
>Audio Vault. The inherent problems in thios setup is the lack of
>expandability due to the excessive cost of proprietary interface cards. Sure
>the system is running on $300 PCs but the comouter is simply used as storage
>and I/O between the main server in the production studio and the user
>terminals in the three broadcast studios. The crux of the functionality of
>the system lies in the $3000+ interface cards that each terminal needs to
>interact with the rest of the system. Is there any way to effectively and
>efficiently overhaul the system and expand the system and maintain
>expandability in the future. I am aware that there are networking solutions
>out there such as Novell Netware that will allow networking of Windows systems
>from a Unix server. But how costly would something like that be to set up
>with no more than ten users?
>
>I'm just getting into the questioning stage at this point. Any help would be
>appreciated.
>
>
>Tim Ellerbee
>Director of Continuity and Production
>Citadel Broadcasting, State College, Pa
More data would help. ie, what does the app do, and what is the nature of the
network you mention (is it ethernet? proprietary ? rs485 ?)
--
Jim Richardson
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
All hail Eris
"Linux, where do you want to go tomorrow?"
------------------------------
From: "jamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com network problem- stumped
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 22:55:32 +0800
I do..... Still searching for the solution.
Jamal
Walt Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have two 3Com 3c509 cards with RedHat 5.2 The system recogizes both
cards just
> fine; however, I cannot ping anything on either LAN. If I remove one of
the cards
> everything works fine. Has anyone seen anything like this?
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chameleon)
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's. Can it be done?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 01:22:13 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 May 1999 16:21:26 GMT, "John Antypas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Good morning all,
>
>The subject says it all. I've got a network problem, I think our Cisco can
>handle, but I'm not sure....
>
>We are trying to build a redundant path to our ISP resources. In the old
>days, we would had a NIC-assigned /24 and run appropriate routing protocols
>between two ISPs. No problem here right?
>
>Today, one cannot get their own /24, and getting ISPs to handle the routing
>info is difficult, so we're going to have to hack this one.
>
>What I'd LIKE to do is this, but I'm not sure it's possible...
>
>Provider A provides a circuit with a /24 address space (real)
>Provider B provides a separate circuit with a separate real /24 address
>space
>We have a Cisco on our end (2611, IOS 12)
>
>A) Can we assign all our internal resources a non-routable space, say
>10.1.1.* and have the Cisco translate, blindly, to one of the ISP's /24
>spaces. True, it would be a manual switchover if that ISP failed, but at
>least I wouldn't have to renumber every host.
>
>B) Can the poor Cisco handle this for an entire /24 If not, what is
>reasonable (20 hosts? 10 hosts?)
>
>C) Is there a way to do automatic failover?
>
>D) More important, are we solving the problem the wrong way?
>
>John Antypas
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I don't quite understand what you are doing. Looks like your are
trying to reinvent ip masquerading at the hardware level?
Are you trying to use the cisco with two single class C addresses, or
switch between the two?
I'm fairly new to networking, so please explain.
------------------------------
From: Bernd Mau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: sendmail & pine
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 16:51:27 +0200
Hello,
pine always overrides the From-Header, so that sendmail doesn=B4t use the=
specifications in the genericstable.db or in the userdb.db.
I tried a lot of configurations for pine, although the
=B4allow-changing-from=3Dyes=B4 and =B4customized-hdrs=3D From:my@address=
=2Ede=B4, to
specify the From-Header directly in pine. It doesn=B4t work. Pine told me=
,
that I=B4m not allowed to modify the From-Header.
Anyway, I would prefer a solution, where pine works like xmail (works
fine) and maybe this works when I use the right flags for sendmail
(sendmail-path).
Can anybody help me, please?
Bernd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Millionth Q about dhcpcd/redhat/@home with some answers
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 01:19:38 GMT
Hello,
To everyone who's been using redhat 5.2 or less...
make sure you have dhcpcd 0.70 or higher
startx
open a shell run netcfg
put yer crXXXXA-a in the hostname
then go to interfaces and add a line that looks like this
eth0 <blank> dhcp yes inactive
edit /sbin/ifup
and change the line with dhcpcd
and insert -h crXXXX-a
reboot it should work...of course with yer NIC compiled into the kernel
and stuff
*NOW*
REDHAT 6.0 and dhcpcd
They've switched to something called pump (I've updated) and they've
taken out the dhcpcd line in /sbin/ifup
Would anyone know how to mess with pump or ifup or know where dhcpcd is
called after ifup is executed?
I can open a shell and
run dhcpcd -h crXXXX-a it will work like the good ole days...
But I'm hoping that redhat peole are not that dumb and they've made some
consideration for people who neeed to the -h switch to get ip info.
Any info would be much appreciated.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "Terence Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Proxy? Or Firewall?
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 23:05:19 +0800
We are about to put a few servers together and place them on a school
network, so that there will be an on-site Web Server and an Intranet
Server acting as a filespace for students. This would of course also
mean getting a domain name for the school. There are not many concerns
over the security of the school network, as at the moment the only way
in is through the router -- all machines are on an internal network and
cannot be accessed from the outside. However, since webservers are less
secure than routers this would probably be likely to change.
Would it be a better option to have running a Proxy Server on the
network, so that the school office (the only area of concern as it has
vital information on its computers) must connect through the Proxy - and
hence we remove the Router from its gateway list. That way there would
be no way to access those computers, not even through the routers. But
my concern is that this would restrict internet access to the office
staff, in that they can't use any software not supporting proxies, such
as Telnet.
Or would it be a better option to setup a machine as a firewall so that
it filters networok traffic? That would be less safe, but certainly is
less restrictive. Would a linux machine setup as a firewall be safe
enough? The other servers on the network are, of course, using Linux -
but that has nothing to do with it. Just letting you know!
Thanks for your help,
Terence Parker.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.samba,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Samba and NT Domain
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 05:36:55 GMT
I've read the MAN pages, and the samba howto, but I've still got some
questions about how to make it work with an NT Domain. I've got an
NT PDC, and two NT BDC's. I'm trying to set up my linux box so that
when I try to connect to a SAMBA share, it checks the name and password
against the NT password. I've tried setting security=server, but when I
do that I can't even browse the shares on the samba box. I think
this may be a problem with the guest account, but I don't know what
it is. When I set it to security=domain, every user needs to have an
account on the linux box, but I don't know how to automate that. I
understand that there is a way to add something to smb.conf to make it
work, but I didn't understand other posts on how to do that. I'll
attach a copy of my smb.conf. Are there any SAMBA gurus who can help me
start getting rid of NT on my network? Thanks,
Greg.
P.S. sorry for the cross post, but I need to get this figured out by the
end of the week or the server will be made into NT...
;********************section global*****************
[global]
workgroup = ntdom
comment = greg's attemt at SAMBA
strict locking = no
share modes = yes
password server = primus
local master = no
security = SERVER
encrypt passwords = yes
wins support = no
os level = 0
domain master = no
prefered master = no
preserve case = yes
netbios name = linux
case sensitive = no
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = False
print command /usr/bin/lpr -r -P %p %s
create mode = 0755
;********************section homes******************
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browsable = True
writable = yes
read only = no
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
;********************section userdata***************
[userdata]
comment = All userdata that you are allowed to see.
path = /home
writable = yes
create mode = 0770
;********************section gregsplace*************
[gregsplace]
browsable = yes
comment = This is a test share
path = /root
writable = no
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.samba,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Samba and NT Domain
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 05:37:12 GMT
I've read the MAN pages, and the samba howto, but I've still got some
questions about how to make it work with an NT Domain. I've got an
NT PDC, and two NT BDC's. I'm trying to set up my linux box so that
when I try to connect to a SAMBA share, it checks the name and password
against the NT password. I've tried setting security=server, but when I
do that I can't even browse the shares on the samba box. I think
this may be a problem with the guest account, but I don't know what
it is. When I set it to security=domain, every user needs to have an
account on the linux box, but I don't know how to automate that. I
understand that there is a way to add something to smb.conf to make it
work, but I didn't understand other posts on how to do that. I'll
attach a copy of my smb.conf. Are there any SAMBA gurus who can help me
start getting rid of NT on my network? Thanks,
Greg.
P.S. sorry for the cross post, but I need to get this figured out by the
end of the week or the server will be made into NT...
;********************section global*****************
[global]
workgroup = ntdom
comment = greg's attemt at SAMBA
strict locking = no
share modes = yes
password server = primus
local master = no
security = SERVER
encrypt passwords = yes
wins support = no
os level = 0
domain master = no
prefered master = no
preserve case = yes
netbios name = linux
case sensitive = no
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = False
print command /usr/bin/lpr -r -P %p %s
create mode = 0755
;********************section homes******************
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browsable = True
writable = yes
read only = no
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
;********************section userdata***************
[userdata]
comment = All userdata that you are allowed to see.
path = /home
writable = yes
create mode = 0770
;********************section gregsplace*************
[gregsplace]
browsable = yes
comment = This is a test share
path = /root
writable = no
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains and dhcpd server
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 21:16:46 -0400
Are you sure you are using dhcp server? If you are running RH6 you are
probably using pump (as in the shoe - you know, boot protocol? don't blame me
for that one) . RH shipped pump with version 6. It is supposed to handle both
dhcp and bootp protocols. The problem with pump is that it only (to my
knowledge) modifies the /etc/resolv.conf file with the search domain and
nameservers. dhcpcd (which is probably what you were running in 5.2 - the
client daemon, not the server) modified the /etc/resolv.conf, and populated
/etc/dhcpc/hostinfo-eth? files for each ethernet device. It even executed the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifdhcpc-done script on startup and anytime it
got a new dhcp offer. Unfortunately, a very common method of kicking of a
firewall was to execute it from ifdhcpc-done. This way, the firewall didn't
suddenly start whacking your connection because every packet was destined for
an unfamiliar ip address (that being your new one).
Anyway, the new program leaves several people high and dry on that count - at
least for now. There are several options for a partial temporary fix, one of
which I am working on. This involves using the pump -s -i eth? command to get
the necessary info on your current dhcp lease (try this command, if you get
valid info, you know you are using pump). This info can then be parsed to
populate the /etc/dhcpc/hostinfo-eth? file. Then the ifdhcpc-done can be
executed as normal.
Another option is to change back to dhcpcd. I am told (but haven't confirmed
this) that all you have to do is edit the /usr/sbin/ifup and ifdown files so
that the corresponding dhcp commands replace the current pump commands.
Good luck with that. If I come up with a temporary fix for pump, I will post
info here.
As for the ipchains issue, it really isn't that difficult. Start with
http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/linux/firewall/index.html
This will give you a good script - at least a base to start from. As soon as
you have that, go to http://www.rustcorp.com/linux/ipchains/
Where you can get the latest HOWTO. I think this is the guy that wrote
ipchains, so you can't get a much better authority. Pay special attention to
section 6.2 if you have problems with masquerading. This is how I fixed mine.
Good luck. Hope this helps.
Lou
Scott MacDonald wrote:
> Could anyone who is successfully using ipchains and dhcpd server please send
> me their configurations for both of these so I can compare. I have read all
> the howto's and man pages yet still can't get a redhat 6.0 to work right
> with these packages. It works flawlessly in 5.1. I would greatly appreciate
> it because I'm about to lose my mind.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mohd H Misnan)
Crossposted-To: jaring.os.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Cannot ping other win95 PCs in same LAN segment
Date: 24 May 1999 08:34:09 GMT
On Mon, 24 May 1999 12:50:05 +0800, Ujang Mohamad Zainudin wrote:
>I answered Y to " Do you want to configure LAN...?"
>and put in the following info for the next dialog box.
>
> IP adderess : 192.1.1.60
> Net Mask : 255.255.255.0
> Default Gateway : 192.1.1.254
> Primary Nameserver : 192.1.1.1
>
>For "Default Gateway" and "Primary Nameserver", I left it to their
>default value
>eventhough I don't have any machines with IP address 192.1.1.254 and
>192.1.1.1 on
>my network.
When you've default gateway, your packet will be routed thru the default gateway
and you surely don't have nameserver. Just reconfigure your LAN using netcfg and
delete the gateway and nameserver.
>So, I reboot the machine and logged in as root.
>The first thing I did was ping the linux own IP address
>which was 192.1.1.60. Yes! It worked.
Surely, its your local machine :)
--
|Mohd Hamid Misnan|[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |i|
|MacOS 8.6 + |http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/3319/ |M|
|AMD K6-2/300 + |We want to take over the world, but we don't have |a|
|Linux 2.2.5-15 i586 |to do it tomorrow. It's OK by next week - Linus T.|c|
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
