Linux-Networking Digest #288, Volume #11 Wed, 26 May 99 03:14:44 EDT
Contents:
connecting SMC 8432T (tulip driver) to RCN Hybrid N-231 cable modem - "No 21041
10BaseT link beat" (desmond at home)
Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's. Can it be done? ("John Antypas")
Linux, NT server and MS Proxy ("Kevin Petracek")
ipfw ? (Eric Trimmer)
Re: IPX routing problem with modem (Valentin Abramov)
Re: Linux, NT server and MS Proxy ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: ipfw ? ("Andrey Smirnov")
Win 98 cannot retrieve list of users from samba (Georg)
Re: Linux, NT server and MS Proxy ("Andrey Smirnov")
Anybody using DSL? (Peter Gutowski)
Re: Red Hat Question ("Jeff Howard")
Re: Sendmail Question ("Andrey Smirnov")
Linux won't boot with network card (Yue Huang)
Re: What am I forgetting with PPP? (Jim Roberts)
Re: NFS with Redhat 6 server and clients ("G. Hugh SONG")
Re: no /dev/eth0 (Neil)
Please help me get DNS server running (Gary Helbig)
AOE Game + IP Masq ("Matt Goebel")
Re: Please help me get DNS server running ("Andrey Smirnov")
passive ftp client (not netscape!!) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Masq and ipfwadm (Argus)
Re: Solaris 7 as NFS Server for Linux (Jim Roberts)
IP Masq + FTP Help ("Matt Goebel")
Re: IP Masquerading ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: DSL questions ("mark")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: desmond at home <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: connecting SMC 8432T (tulip driver) to RCN Hybrid N-231 cable modem - "No
21041 10BaseT link beat"
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 23:17:09 -0400
Has anyone got connected to RCN's cable modem? I am stuck and RCN don't support
linux.
The dhdcp gets the ip address, but the link light on the cable modem lights for
only a few seconds and then goes out.
Using RH5.2
Any suggestions?
tulip.c:v0.89H 5/23/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eth0: Digital DC21041 Tulip at 0xfc80, 21041 mode, 00 e0 29 36 4f 85, IRQ 11.
eth0:21041 Media information at 30, default media 0000 (10baseT).
eth0: 21041 media #0, 10baseT.
eth0: 21041 media #0, 10baseT.
eth0: No 21041 10baseT link beat, Media switched to 10base2.
ARP: arp called for own IP address
eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled.
------------------------------
From: "John Antypas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's. Can it be done?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 04:42:59 GMT
OK -- I see I didn't explain what I wanted very well... sorry about that.
What I'm, in effect, trying to do, BGP or similar. In the old days, to
allow for a reliable network, I'd go to Internic, get my /24 (MY /24) and
get two providers. I'd then use routing protocols to handle the routing of
my /24 onto whichever provider happenned to be better at the time. More
often that not, it would stay on a given provider "A". However, if provider
"A" failed, "B" would take over. A good thing.
Problem is:
- Today, just try to get a portable /24
- Try to get two providers to route for it
So, what I'd like to do is get TWO providers, each with their own /24 space,
to handle our "C". True, I could simply switch manually, and renumber all
hosts, but that gets ugly.
So, if the Cisco has enough horsepower to handle it, I thought I might be
able to use something like "blind NAT" to do the following:
- Provider "A" provides us a route for /24 100.100.10.*
- Provider "B" provides us a route for /24 194.12.5.*
- Our Cisco has a config file active most of the time that says, "translate
100.100.10.x into 10.0.0.x -- nothing more -- a simple IP change in both
directions"
- Should we lose provider "A", either automatically, or manaully, the Cisco
is told to now translate 194.12.5.* into 10.0.0.x again, by blind NAT.
Sure, it's ugly. But it means I can switch an entire LAN between address
spaces as needed. The question is:
- I believe the Cisco can do this simple address rewrite. It's not stock
NAT -- we want both inbound and outbound connections translated, little
else.
- If it can, can it handle the workload -- assume a single T-1's bandwidth.
(2611 Cisco, IOS 12.0)
------------------------------
From: "Kevin Petracek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux, NT server and MS Proxy
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:19:44 -0600
Does anyone know if its possible to use netscape on Linux connected to a NT
server 4.0 running IIS4 and MS Proxy 2.0 to connect to the internet.?
And if so, could you point out a source of information on how to accomplish
this.
btw, my NT server is connected to the internet via adsl and works fine with
windows 98 that are connected to the NT server to access the internet.
------------------------------
From: Eric Trimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfw ?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 23:26:45 -0400
I'm trying to use the command "ipfw" but I am getting nowhere.
The ip_masquerading HOWTO that I have says to issue this command:
ipfw a m all from 10.0.0.1/24 to 0.0.0.0/0
But this is of no use what so ever ! I've tried several different command
options but I keep getting error messages; either "unknown keyword" or
"illegal protocal name". I've tried reading the man page for ipfw and the
"--help" argument for ipfw. But I have gotten absolutly nowhere !
I have a dos machine which I've given the address 10.0.0.1. And it is
connected to my Linux machine(which is a host on the Internet) via plip. To
use IP_Masquerading and give my dos machine access to the Internet.
What should the command line for ipfw look like ?
=============================================================
Eric Trimmer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=============================================================
------------------------------
Subject: Re: IPX routing problem with modem
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Valentin Abramov)
Date: 26 May 1999 05:02:22 GMT
In article <7ieohf$cff$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
You need ipx routing daemon on Linux box. Take a look to
http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux/
There is separate page about IPX over PPP.
Regards,
Valentin Abramov
>Hi!
>I have RedHat Linux 5.2 as a server. There are a modem ttyS0 and a
network
>adapter (NE2000) eth0. Network adapter connected to a LAN (1 client).
Remote
>client connects to a ppp0 device. I need to play Blood (or
DukeNukem...) on
>between the clients via server. This games works only with IPX
protocol. I
>have pppd daemon (compiled with IPX support) and a kernel 2.0.36
(compiled
>with IPX support too). My file options.ttyS0:
>
>ipx
>ipx-network 0xabcdef00
>ipx-node 2:0
>ipxcp-accept-remote
>
>I enable IPX bind to the eth0 by command:
>
>ipx_interface add -p eth0 etherII 0xabcdef01
>
>When the remote client loggs in to the server it starts up searching
for
>network players in the games. I can see the modem light RD is flashing
and
>the Link-Active light on the network adapter on the server is flashing
too.
>But when I start searching for players on the LAN client the
Link-Active
>flashes, but the modem light SD not flashes. IPX-packets are not going
to
>the remote client. I can run ifconfig and see that IPX-packets from
remote
>machine are going to LAN, but packets from LAN are not going to the
remote
>client.
>What can I do ?
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux, NT server and MS Proxy
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:53:45 -0700
Hello!
I don't know if try this already but...
Go to preferences in Netscape, --> advance --> proxies --> manual proxy
configuration --> view, and enter ip address of your proxy server in there
folowed by port (default in MS proxy is 80).
But it only works for browsing web pages.
Good luck!
Kevin Petracek wrote in message <7ift0e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Does anyone know if its possible to use netscape on Linux connected to a
NT
>server 4.0 running IIS4 and MS Proxy 2.0 to connect to the internet.?
>
>And if so, could you point out a source of information on how to accomplish
>this.
>
>btw, my NT server is connected to the internet via adsl and works fine with
>windows 98 that are connected to the NT server to access the internet.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipfw ?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 20:50:43 -0700
Hello!
It depends on ver of ipfwadm, but I think you can try this:
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 10.0.0.1/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
Good luck!
Eric Trimmer wrote in message ...
>I'm trying to use the command "ipfw" but I am getting nowhere.
>The ip_masquerading HOWTO that I have says to issue this command:
>
> ipfw a m all from 10.0.0.1/24 to 0.0.0.0/0
>
>But this is of no use what so ever ! I've tried several different command
>options but I keep getting error messages; either "unknown keyword" or
>"illegal protocal name". I've tried reading the man page for ipfw and the
>"--help" argument for ipfw. But I have gotten absolutly nowhere !
>
>I have a dos machine which I've given the address 10.0.0.1. And it is
>connected to my Linux machine(which is a host on the Internet) via plip. To
>use IP_Masquerading and give my dos machine access to the Internet.
>What should the command line for ipfw look like ?
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Eric Trimmer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg)
Subject: Win 98 cannot retrieve list of users from samba
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 17:30:30 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to share workstation resources via user-level share but Windows
98 cannot retrieve the list.
Is there a setting in Samba I need for that?
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux, NT server and MS Proxy
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:56:30 -0700
One more thing...
If you want to use other services on the Internet from your Linux box, you
should look on http://support.microsoft.com/support and search for
transparent proxy settings.
Good luck!
Kevin Petracek wrote in message <7ift0e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Does anyone know if its possible to use netscape on Linux connected to a
NT
>server 4.0 running IIS4 and MS Proxy 2.0 to connect to the internet.?
>
>And if so, could you point out a source of information on how to accomplish
>this.
>
>btw, my NT server is connected to the internet via adsl and works fine with
>windows 98 that are connected to the NT server to access the internet.
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutowski)
Subject: Anybody using DSL?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:47:35 -0400
We've been approached by a company called "Network Plus" which is offering
connectivity to the internet using DSL (Digital Subscriber Line). The
sales literature suggests a better bang for the buck than we're currently
getting from our dedicated frame relay (56k) line. (Total charges "appear"
to be about $170/month for 160K vs total of over $300/month we're now
paying to phone company and ISP for 56K connection.)
I haven't seen much written about this of late and don't recollect seeing
any discussion about this here.
If you have any thoughts/recommendations with regard to DSL in general or
to Network Plus in specific, I'd be interesting in hearing from you.
Bleeding edge technology is fascinating, but having "been there, done
that" I'd rather ask and hear the dirt first.
--
remove the bounce. from my email address
The correct addres should read peterg at powervue dot com:)
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat Question
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:59:22 -0500
Arthur,
What does your routing table look like?
Arthur Merar wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Hello,
>
>I just installed Red Hat 5.2. I have a 3Com 3c509 Ethernet card in
>it. Linux sees the card just fine but I cannot ping the machine or
>out from the machine. All my other machines are fine.
>
>When I type ifconfig, this is what I get:
>
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:24:EA:8E
> inet addr:192.168.10.11 Bcast:192.168.10.255
> Mark:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> collisions:0
> Interupt:10 Base address:0x300
>
>Anyhow, a friend suggested trying TCPDUMP. I looked and it is not
>installed.....but it is on the CD. how do I install it?
>
>I am looking for help trying to get this NIC to work.,....if you have
>any suggestions, please let me know.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Arthur
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail Question
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:19:30 -0700
Hello!
There is a file /etc/sendmail.cw
All you need to do is list domain.com as an alias in that file for machine
xyz.domain.com.
Also if you want to masquerade xyz.domain.com to domain.com (so all the mail
sent from xyz will look like sent from @domain.com not from @xyz.domain.com)
you need to add domain.com to the DM variable in sendmail.cf. Just search
for DM.
Good luck!
William Schwartz wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
I'm trying to configure sendmail so that it will take mail sent to the
domain.
Ie: the machine xyz.domain.com will take mail addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm running redhat 6.0 and want to use the sendmail.mc script to
generate the sendmail.cf file but i'm not familiar with how all the
pieces of that fit together
thanks,
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Yue Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux won't boot with network card
Date: 26 May 1999 04:12:17 GMT
I have setup a few linux boxes (Slackware) without problem. Now I got an old
machine and have trouble to install linux. This is a 386sx with 8 meg ram
and 128 meg HD. without an ISA network card (ne2000 clone), I can use
bootdisk, bare.i, to boot the machine with linux. However, it hangs during
booting if I put an NIC ne2000 clone in the box. The NIC works well in all
other 5 linux boxes and also in the 386sx under DOS. I have tried different
settings of I/O address and IRQ, and had no success.
Linux hangs when it detected the HD, i.e.
hda: QUANTUM ELS127A, 122 MB w/32kB Cache, CHS=919/16/17
Could someone to help me on this problem? Linux is not very useful without
an NIC in the box.
Thank you,
yue
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: What am I forgetting with PPP?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 04:21:56 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am running RH 5.0 with the 2.0.31 kernel. I set up the PPP stuff as
> per the ISP-Hookup HOWTO, and everything works fine as root, but if I
> try getting on the net as a normal user, as soon as the handshake is
> over the connection is dropped. I have no idea why. I am not using
> RH's Network Config tool to do this. I created a group called
> "pppusers" and added the users I wanted to it." I then changed the
> ownership of /sbin/pppd and /sbin/chat to pppusers, and added a symlink
> to /sbin/chat in /usr/bin (called chat). I also changed the ownership
> of /var/lock to pppusers. There are no errors logged in
SNIP
> I'd appreciate any help, cuz I'm stumped.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mladen
Who owns /dev/modem or actually /dev/cuax ?
JIm
------------------------------
From: "G. Hugh SONG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: NFS with Redhat 6 server and clients
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:56:22 +0900
Jon Paterson wrote:
>
> I am having a frustrating problem with a Redhat 6 server that was
> previously a redhat 5.2 server rebuilt.
>
> I have a Linux client (redhat 6.0 also) that is trying to connect to the
> server and is always getting the "permission denied" message.
>
> There is nothing wrong with the exports file, I have even deleted it and
> done the configuration through Linuxconf, and the same error exists.
>
> I think that it may have something to do with Knfsd, but am not sure
> where to look.
>
> can anyone help or point me in the right direction?
>
> regards,
>
> Jon Paterson
I am having the same problem on both systems of Intel/Linux and
Alpha/Linux. The error message reads as
fh_verify: ///permission failure, acc=3 error=13
and something similar but related to nfs-something.
I guess that it is not related to RedHat6.0. In my case,
it appears that it is related to the recent kernels, 2.2.8 and
2.2.9. It appears that it does no harm on the system. But,
certainly, it makes me quite nervous.
Unfortunately, I don't know more than that.
Regards,
--
G. Hugh Song
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: no /dev/eth0
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 05:54:14 GMT
On Tue, 25 May 1999 13:49:56 -0400, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I'm
>not at my pc, but I believe it's in /etc/rc.d/init.d - someone correct
>me if I'm wrong, since I'm so new at linux). You should now see eth0,
>and you can go about setting up your route(s).
Thanks. The problems was that SuSE base/ standard install does NOT install the
PCMCIA package. Once I had installed it, everything was fine -- almost. I had
to edit the routing config files make sure the correct route was being loaded at
boot. Info on routing config files is in the SusE manual - as well as how to
stop/start a route.
Neil
==================================
Neil
ICQ 11875525 - AOL IM "imheifetz"
------------------------------
From: Gary Helbig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please help me get DNS server running
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:18:53 -0700
Hi,
I'm trying to get my DNS server running, and it's giving me serious
grief.
I have named.conf set up according to the HOWTO. There is the
0.0.127.in-addr.arpa zone, and my domain (ghelbig.com) zone.
The /var/named entries seem to be correct.
The server will start (with no warnings/errors), and say the zones
are loaded.
The server also says that it's listening. On 127.0.0.1:53 (lo) and
192.168.1.254:53 (eth0).
I can ping the zone (ghelbig.com) by name, that works.
If I put 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf (as the nameserver), it works.
But if I put 192.168.1.254 as the nameserver, it times out. I can see
it trying to hit the port (the net activity light flashes), but I get
the message:
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.1.254: No response from
server
*** Default servers are not available
And I can't for the life of me figure out what's going wrong.
Thanks in advance,
Gary
ghelbigATmailcityDOTcom
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AOE Game + IP Masq
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 01:54:56 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Anyone out there get games like AOE to work over a masqueraded internet
connection? I'd prefer to host on the online gaming zone but I'm not sure
this is possible? It's launched via a webpage. I've also got a firewall up
that blocks out all unusual ports that these games may be using. So if
anyone knows what ports any of the popular games are using please post them
so I can alter my firewall to allow connections on these ports. Thanks
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Please help me get DNS server running
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:03:01 -0700
Hello!
Setup another in-addr.arpa zone for your 192.168.1 network and everything
should work just fine!
Whe you run nslookup with 182.168.1.254 as a default DNS it's trying to
resolve IP address to the DNS name and it can not!
Good luck!
Gary Helbig wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get my DNS server running, and it's giving me serious
>grief.
>
> I have named.conf set up according to the HOWTO. There is the
>0.0.127.in-addr.arpa zone, and my domain (ghelbig.com) zone.
>
> The /var/named entries seem to be correct.
>
> The server will start (with no warnings/errors), and say the zones
>are loaded.
>
> The server also says that it's listening. On 127.0.0.1:53 (lo) and
>192.168.1.254:53 (eth0).
>
> I can ping the zone (ghelbig.com) by name, that works.
>
> If I put 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf (as the nameserver), it works.
>But if I put 192.168.1.254 as the nameserver, it times out. I can see
>it trying to hit the port (the net activity light flashes), but I get
>the message:
>
>*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.1.254: No response from
>server
>*** Default servers are not available
>
>And I can't for the life of me figure out what's going wrong.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Gary
>ghelbigATmailcityDOTcom
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: passive ftp client (not netscape!!)
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 05:50:37 GMT
hi
does anyone know of a passive ftp client (other than netscape)
that can talk to a passive ftp provider proxy server..., and
has session / lost download recovery.... wget! doesn't seem to
support passive ftp... atleast the version i have, which came
with RH5.2...
sorry if this Q, doesn't belong here...
TIA,
banibrata.
--
---- e a s y --- c o m e ---e a s y --- g o ------
======================= bdutta@my=dejanews.com ===
--- AdTel Software Pvt. Ltd, NOIDA, India --------
==================================================
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Argus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masq and ipfwadm
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 05:53:28 GMT
> I am using Kernel 2.0.34 , ipfwadm. The Linux box contains the
> modem. With 98% of web sites it works great but with a few sites,
> computers behind the firewall can not connect while the Linux box
> can? One of these sites is American Airlines: www.aa.com. The
> outgoing packets seem to get to the AA server but the server does not
> send back any pages?
>
> What could be causing this problem?
www.aa.com resolves to 151.193.131.51. Is that anywhere close to what
your internet address would be? There might be a deny/reject rule that
denies any incoming packets over your internet connection with an
source address close to you ip. Maybe you specified subnet? Hand-pick
over your ruleset to see which rules might be the culprit. Also if you
haven't already, add the -o option to all of your denies. That will
log them so you can go to your /var/log/messages file and see exactly
whats going wrong.
Hope that helps.
Argus
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: Solaris 7 as NFS Server for Linux
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 04:19:17 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yueshi) writes:
> Sorry for the previsous, corrupted posting!
>
> Dear collegues,
>
> I have a problem with the Solaris 7, since I'm trying to let my Solaris 7
> computer be the NFS server for Linux, which is connected to the Solaris 7
> machine with a 10Mbps network. If I try to connect from the Linux machine
> to Solaris, either by telnet or ftp, I had to wait for up to about 2-3
> minutes, until I get the login prompt. And the situation is even worser
> if I try to use Solaris as NFS server. I actually need to try many times,
> until I'm coming into the moment, in which the Solaris server is willing
> to response, and the NFS client don't stop with a timeout. Are there any
> possibilities to overcome this problem?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yueshi Lai
>
It appears you have a host lookup problem in the S7 box. You will need
to make sure the S7 box is using the "hosts" file by checking the nsswitch.conf
file and making sure the ip to host name for the linux box is in the host
file on the S7 box.
I use S7 her as an NFS server to both Linux and FreeBSD. The new kernel
NFS on Linux screams.
Jim
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masq + FTP Help
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 01:48:12 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
After setting up my Linux box (Redhat 6) to use IP masq'n (via IP chains)
all of my sevices work except FTP. I can log in but can't ls, so it doesn't
work. Now I've seen posts somewhere that say to use ip_masq_ftp.o . This
is on my drive but how to I load this module? Even though the other
services work should I also load the other modules in that folder too??
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:06:10 -0700
Nop!
Thunderbolt19 wrote in message <7if7g5$cba$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Do I have to have a static IP to do IP Masquerading if Im dialed into my
ISP
>via a modem? Thanks...
>
>--
>Eric Waters
>Total Distribution, Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: "mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DSL questions
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 00:04:07 -0500
I agree, the 200 bucks sounds *way* too high. I have 256K both ways for 40
bucks a month, can upgrade to 512 for only 15 dollars more a month... shop
around.
mark
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
