Linux-Networking Digest #292, Volume #11 Wed, 26 May 99 12:13:44 EDT
Contents:
Re: Have I been Hacked? (Kevin Martin)
Re: Microsoft Exchange ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: IP Masquerading on 2.2 ("Donald E. Stidwell")
remote printing problem (Enrique Alonso de Armas)
Redhat 6 upgraded where is ip_alias (Jason Brossa)
Re: advance power management (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Re: Winbloze98-Telnet&FTP ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help: Linux PPP to Windows RAS (Matt Eckhaus)
Re: Have I been Hacked? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: NFS uploading problem - too slow (Steffen Wagner)
Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's. Can it be done? (Barry Margolin)
SuSE 6.1 xdialppp problem ("Ron Fodor")
Re: Sybase ASE on Linux faq needed (Michael Peppler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Martin)
Subject: Re: Have I been Hacked?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:02:02 GMT
>David Peavey wrote:
>>
>> I have RH5.2 loaded as an IP-Masquerade and firewall for my
>> computers at home. This morning I found the following
>> in /var/log/messages
>>
>> May 23 04:41:43 c49590-a portmap[1670]: connect from 24.1.69.165
>> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
>> May 23 04:41:48 c49590-a portmap[1671]: connect from 24.1.69.165
yada yada yada...
>> May 24 02:31:28 c49590-a portmap[1760]: connect from 24.1.234.200
>> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
>> May 24 04:02:03 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[1791]: (su) session opened for
>> user nobody by (uid=99)
>> May 24 04:04:19 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[1791]: (su) session closed for
>> user nobody
>>
>> YIKES! LOOK at last two lines ABOVE!
Cron job, probably the one to update your locate database at 4:00am. You've
got a very stupid individual beating his head against your NFS daemon,
apparently without success, and a completely unrelated, perfectly normal
system housekeeping activity using the user 'nobody' just as it should. You
cannot log in as 'nobody'.
It is important that you know what a NORMAL overnight log looks like, so you
can distinguish between normal and abnormal activity. If you'd seen that
4:00am entry every night since you first brought up the box, it wouldn't be
nearly as alarming now, would it?
You might want to drop a dime on Home.com, though -- yet another (two or
three) of their idiot users has left his system wide open, and some wannabe
cracker is using it to scrape off his own identity as he randomly rattles
doorknobs all over the Net. It is so utterly frustrating to see some of the
clowns that they sell service to, while I sit up here in the boondocks with
a fscking 28.8 MODEM... but that's another rant altogether.
Trim the log when you post, we'll tell you if we need more. Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Microsoft Exchange
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 13:24:44 GMT
Hi!
If you just want to get your mail via an Exchange Server use a mail
client with pop3 and smtp support (i.e. Netscape, xfmail, pine). Other
servies of the Exchange server like public folders can�t be used. (as
far as I know).
S. Alpers
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
bb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I'm using RH5.2 / 2.2.6 / KDE and all is working except for my Mail.
>
> Is anybody using a linux mail client to connect to a Microsoft
Exchange
> Server ?
> If so , which is the best one to use ? (besides scrapping the
Microsoft
> beast :) )
>
> Thanks
> Cheers
> bb
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "Donald E. Stidwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading on 2.2
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:07:29 GMT
Well, I finally got the *@(# thing to work. Have no idea of why after
about the 40th compile, the modules finally got made.
Looked at LILO.CONF and realised that the kernel being used was the one
in /boot and not the new kernel in /. Once I pointed LILO to the right
kernel, everything started working.
However it took far too much trouble to figure this out and I STILL
don't know why the IP_MASQ modules finally got made or why they were not
getting made before. What sense does it make to have the new kernel
appear in a place not referenced by LILO? Especially when the book only
tells you to compile and reboot. (The book also tells you to use make
zlilo when you really need to use make bzlilo).
I'm no newbie at compiling kernels but I've never had so much trouble
with getting things working after a compile as I've had with COL 2.2.
On the positive side I think COL is on the right track. The install was
a piece of cake and I definitely like the look and feel of KDE in COL
2.2. They just need to dump COAS and put proper information in their
manual.
Don
> I sort of wonder - I've done all that but no luck. The modules are created,
> but cannot be loaded at all due to undefined symbols (seems ip_masq.o is not
> created at all). The ipchains family cannot run - wrong kernel. Looked at the
> source for that and it's trying to read /proc/net/ip_forwards, which of
> course does not exist.
>
> --
> Robert Segall
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Enrique Alonso de Armas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: remote printing problem
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 15:33:42 +0200
Hi,
I have two linux and a printer ; )
My problem is that users with an account in both boxes can print, but the
rest of them can not.
Other problem is that root nor users with account in the server can not
delete the jobs from queue, from the client machine. In fact they can
print but they can not control their jobs
Here, the printcap files:
SERVER
lp|hplj4l|HP Laserjet 4L:\
:lp=/dev/lp1:sd=/var/spool/lpd/hplj4l:\
:sh:pw#80:pl#72:px#1440:mx#0:\
:if=/etc/magicfilter/laserjet-filter:
CLIENT
lp|hplj4l|HP Laserjet 4L:\
:lp:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/hplj4l:\
:rm=delal.delegacion:\
:rp=hplj4l:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:
Thanks in advance
====================================
Enrique Alonso de Armas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
visita
http://indulinux.etsii.upm.es
ftp://ftp.indulinux.etsii.upm.es
====================================
------------------------------
From: Jason Brossa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 6 upgraded where is ip_alias
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 13:21:43 GMT
Hi I have recently upgraded to Redhat 6.0
can someone tell me if the ip_alias.o module has been replaced
and if so with what?
Thanks,
jay
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: advance power management
Date: 26 May 1999 22:45:32 +0800
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul D Pandian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Okay: Question. I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.0 (and tried
Paul> all the rest upwards too inlcuding the latest 2.3.3). System
Paul> cannot shutdown. Even when I selected the APM options under
Paul> kernel configuration and compilation.
Have you enabled SMP? If so, you'll see a message "APM disabled: APM
is not SMP-safe". That's why I have to power off my machine manually
now.
Paul> What do I do ?
Try to use the kernel boot option "apm=smp-power-off". I found it by
skimming the kernel source code. I have no luck in making it work,
though. So, good luck!
--
Lee Sau Dan $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5) ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ)
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Winbloze98-Telnet&FTP ?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:19:02 GMT
On Tue, 25 May 1999 21:11:07 -0700, "Andrey Smirnov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello!
>
>It has everything to do with your routing!
>
>Can you include output of netstat -rn and ifconfig -a please.
>
>Good luck!
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>Whenever I try to connect to my linux server across my LAN using
>>either WS-FTP or CRT(telnet) My dial-up tries to initiate. What is the
>>easiest way to make my machines know that the linux server is local.
>>My lan IP range is 10.0.0. which isnt even an internet adress range.
>>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>
I am assuming you mean net stat on the workstation? Here it is..Also I
couldn't get a ifconfig -a to work on 98...Am I missing something? I
was connected to the internet when I did the net stat so that would
explain all the 209 and so forth. Thanks for Any possible help! Bob.
Route Table
Active Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface
Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.179.17.4 209.179.17.4
1
10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.0.0.10 10.0.0.10
2
10.0.0.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.10 10.0.0.10
1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
209.179.17.0 255.255.255.0 209.179.17.4 209.179.17.4
1
209.179.17.4 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
209.179.17.255 255.255.255.255 209.179.17.4 209.179.17.4
1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 10.0.0.10 10.0.0.10
1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 209.179.17.4 209.179.17.4
1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 209.179.17.4 209.179.17.4
1
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP 10.0.0.10:1025 10.0.0.4:139 ESTABLISHED
TCP 209.179.17.4:1026 207.217.120.12:110 TIME_WAIT
TCP 209.179.17.4:1031 207.217.77.140:119 ESTABLISHED
C:\>
"Ask the experienced rather than the learned."
--Arabic Proverb
------------------------------
From: Matt Eckhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Help: Linux PPP to Windows RAS
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 23:33:30 +1000
Hi
I'm trying, and failing, to make a PPP connection from my Redhat 6.0 box
to a Windows NT 4 server running RAS.
- I'm NOT using callback
- The server is configured to allow plain text authorisation
- The server is configured to allocate an IP address (using DHCP)
I can connect using a Windows 95 client, but not using PPP from linux.
I can also connect from my Linux box to a regular (Unix) PPP server.
I have read on Deja that I should be able to start a dialup PPP
connection with no problems.
But nothing happens after I connect; as far as I can tell the server
doesn't send anything and it doesn't start PPP.
What should happen when I connect? Is the server meant to initiate a
username/password dialog?
Are there any configuration options in Redhat that I should have
selected?
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Matt
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have I been Hacked?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 09:33:14 -0400
What are your firewall rules ??
The firewall rules should deny all outside access.
David Peavey wrote:
>
> I have RH5.2 loaded as an IP-Masquerade and firewall for my
> computers at home. This morning I found the following
> in /var/log/messages
>
> May 23 04:41:43 c49590-a portmap[1670]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 04:41:48 c49590-a portmap[1671]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 06:29:08 c49590-a portmap[1676]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 06:29:12 c49590-a portmap[1677]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:24:29 c49590-a portmap[1682]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:25:07 c49590-a portmap[1683]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:36:20 c49590-a portmap[1684]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:36:30 c49590-a portmap[1685]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:36:40 c49590-a portmap[1686]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:37:16 c49590-a portmap[1687]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:37:26 c49590-a portmap[1688]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:37:36 c49590-a portmap[1689]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:42:04 c49590-a portmap[1690]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:42:09 c49590-a portmap[1691]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:43:43 c49590-a portmap[1692]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(ypserv): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 08:48:19 c49590-a portmap[1693]: connect from 128.5.1.90
> to callit(pcnfsd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:09:04 c49590-a portmap[1696]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:16:09 c49590-a portmap[1697]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:19:24 c49590-a portmap[1698]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:21:45 c49590-a portmap[1699]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:23:28 c49590-a portmap[1700]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(ypserv): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:24:27 c49590-a portmap[1701]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(ypserv): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:26:53 c49590-a portmap[1702]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:27:03 c49590-a portmap[1703]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 09:27:13 c49590-a portmap[1704]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 10:29:32 c49590-a portmap[1707]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 10:29:37 c49590-a portmap[1708]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 11:22:02 c49590-a portmap[1711]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 12:25:29 c49590-a portmap[1714]: connect from
> 144.254.210.12 to getport(ypserv): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 12:43:06 c49590-a portmap[1715]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 14:29:58 c49590-a portmap[1720]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 14:30:02 c49590-a portmap[1721]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 14:58:50 c49590-a identd[1722]: from: 130.207.7.21 (
> santanni.cc.gatech.edu ) for: 63225, 21
> May 23 14:58:51 c49590-a identd[1722]: Returned: 63225 , 21 :
> NO-USER
> May 23 14:58:52 c49590-a identd[1723]: from: 130.207.7.21 (
> santanni.cc.gatech.edu ) for: 63225, 21
> May 23 14:58:52 c49590-a identd[1723]: Returned: 63225 , 21 :
> NO-USER
> May 23 15:12:09 c49590-a identd[1726]: from: 193.63.255.4 (
> swallow.doc.ic.ac.uk ) for: 63228, 21
> May 23 15:12:09 c49590-a identd[1726]: Returned: 63228 , 21 :
> NO-USER
> May 23 16:43:25 c49590-a portmap[1729]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 16:43:29 c49590-a portmap[1730]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 18:30:32 c49590-a portmap[1735]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 18:30:37 c49590-a portmap[1736]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 20:43:45 c49590-a portmap[1741]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 20:43:50 c49590-a portmap[1742]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 22:31:01 c49590-a portmap[1747]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 23 22:31:06 c49590-a portmap[1748]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 24 00:44:01 c49590-a portmap[1753]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 24 00:44:05 c49590-a portmap[1754]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 24 02:31:24 c49590-a portmap[1759]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 24 02:31:28 c49590-a portmap[1760]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 24 04:02:03 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[1791]: (su) session opened for
> user nobody by (uid=99)
> May 24 04:04:19 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[1791]: (su) session closed for
> user nobody
>
> YIKES! LOOK at last two lines ABOVE!
>
> By the way, I did have ftp, telnet, and gopher commented
> out in my inetd.conf file. (This was an attempt to keep
> the hackers from doing those to my machine). OK - I'm
> still a rookie but this sounds pretty scary. Nobody on
> my network at home was using their computers. Nobody I
> know was trying to contact my network or firewall. All
> the activity was unexpected.
>
> So I went into inetd.conf and commented out every single
> service and rebooted. The following showed
> up tonight.
>
> ...
>
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995
> Caldera, Inc.
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: Appletalk 0.17 for Linux
> NET3.035
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x280:
> 00 40 05 e4 f9 b7
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: eth0: NE2000 found at 0x280,
> using IRQ 5.
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300:
> 00 40 05 e4 fa 04
> May 25 01:56:27 c49590-a kernel: eth1: NE2000 found at 0x300,
> using IRQ 10.
> May 25 01:56:30 c49590-a inetd[317]: #exec/tcp: unknown service
> May 25 01:56:30 c49590-a inetd[317]: #dtalk/tcp: unknown service
> May 25 02:28:05 c49590-a portmap[362]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 02:28:08 c49590-a portmap[363]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 02:47:45 c49590-a portmap[364]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 02:47:49 c49590-a portmap[365]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 04:02:04 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[396]: (su) session opened for
> user nobody by (uid=99)
> May 25 04:03:42 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[396]: (su) session closed for
> user nobody
>
> There it is again! ^^^^
>
> May 25 06:28:29 c49590-a portmap[441]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 06:28:33 c49590-a portmap[442]: connect from 24.1.234.200
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 06:48:01 c49590-a portmap[443]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
> May 25 06:48:05 c49590-a portmap[444]: connect from 24.1.69.165
> to callit(mountd): request from unauthorized host
>
> This is me vvv
>
> May 25 10:04:20 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[352]: (login) session opened
> for user root by (uid=0)
> May 25 10:04:20 c49590-a login[352]: ROOT LOGIN ON tty1
> May 25 10:04:20 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[352]: (login) session closed
> for user root
> May 25 10:05:15 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[353]: (login) session opened
> for user root by (uid=0)
> May 25 10:05:15 c49590-a login[353]: ROOT LOGIN ON tty2
> May 25 10:05:15 c49590-a PAM_pwdb[353]: (login) session closed
> for user root
>
> Any Clues?
--
Come Visit Our Website
http://www.freeyellow.com/members/creative-services
Please Visit Our Sponsers (We get paid per visit)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Wagner)
Subject: Re: NFS uploading problem - too slow
Date: 26 May 1999 13:36:28 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Larry Irons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If anyone can help me with this one, I would appreciate it.
>
> I have a Linux Server running kernel 2.0.36, Caldera OpenLinux 1.3. I
> have three SCSI drives, mounted to /d1, /d2, and /d3. The root is an ide
> drive. Everything is fine on the Linux box.
>
Hi,
I have the same problem. We use a Linux Server running 2.2.9 kernel including
with nfs. Writing on other OS (Solaris 2.6) is very slow. I tried to tune
with mount nfs option "wsize , rsize" ... no effects.
I think the problem can fix as follow:
- use nfs2 on both sides or
- install the same OS on both sides (x86 Solaris 2.7 seems like a good solution)
> I have the three drives exported as NSF mounts and all other Unix
> machines can mount the drives. I can download from the Linux server to a
> Sun Ultra 30 a 700-megabyte file in less than 2-1/2 minutes. but if I
> try to upload to the Linux server it goes really slow (hours). I think
> the Sun is thinking that it has lost its connection to the Linux
> computer.
>
> Anyone know what I need to do to get the upload process to work
> properly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Larry
>
--
Gruss
Steffen
`The only stupid question is the unasked one.`
Dipl.-Ing. Steffen Wagner | C O M
Communication Networks, Aachen University of Technology | --v-^-v-^-v-^-v--
Phone: +49-241-807917 Fax: +49-241-8888-242 | N E T S
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RWTH Aachen, Germany
http://www.comnets.rwth-aachen.de/~sw |
------------------------------
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's. Can it be done?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 15:37:58 GMT
In article <nZK23.933$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Antypas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK -- I see I didn't explain what I wanted very well... sorry about that.
>
>What I'm, in effect, trying to do, BGP or similar. In the old days, to
>allow for a reliable network, I'd go to Internic, get my /24 (MY /24) and
>get two providers. I'd then use routing protocols to handle the routing of
>my /24 onto whichever provider happenned to be better at the time. More
>often that not, it would stay on a given provider "A". However, if provider
>"A" failed, "B" would take over. A good thing.
>
>Problem is:
>
>- Today, just try to get a portable /24
>- Try to get two providers to route for it
If you're multi-homed, decent providers will implement BGP routing with
you. You don't need a portable /24, you get a /24 from one ISP's address
block; it would be best to get it from the *backup* ISP's address block,
rather than the primary ISP's block. You then run BGP with both ISPs. As
long as your connection with the primary ISP is up, it will advertise the
/24 that it learns from you. If that connection goes down, it will stop
propagating the route, and traffic for you will go via the backup ISP
because they're advertising the larger CIDR block that contains your
address.
>- I believe the Cisco can do this simple address rewrite. It's not stock
>NAT -- we want both inbound and outbound connections translated, little
>else.
For inbound connections you'll need static translations, which are
straightforward to configure on Ciscos. Other than that, it's stock NAT.
>- If it can, can it handle the workload -- assume a single T-1's bandwidth.
>(2611 Cisco, IOS 12.0)
No problem.
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
------------------------------
From: "Ron Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SuSE 6.1 xdialppp problem
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 09:38:54 -0400
SuSE 6.1 and xdialppp
I was able to mount my Windows drive C: and cp the connection log to it as a
text file so now I can give more detail as to what is happening. Connected
but wont talk to mindspring using xdialppp (or anything else that I have
tried). I can ping myself but get no responses to ping to any external IP
address.
All help sincerely appreciated....... I am getting to the end of my rope on
Linux because I cant make anything work ie., sound (sound blaster live),
Printer (Lexmark execjet IIc), etc.
Thanks for any advice/guidance. It would really speed things up if I could
get a internet connection so I could search for help on these other problems
without having to kill SuSE and boot Win98.
May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the
University of California
May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: registered device ppp0
May 26 08:28:11 localhost pppd[379]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: timeout set to 3 seconds
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: send (rAT^M)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: expect (OK)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: rAT^M^F^M
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: OK
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: send (ATH0^M)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: timeout set to 30 seconds
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: expect (OK)
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: ^M
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: ATH0^M^M
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: OK
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: send (ATL2DT4042873038^M)
May 26 08:28:13 localhost chat[382]: expect (CONNECT)
May 26 08:28:13 localhost chat[382]: ^M
May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: ATL2DT4042873038^M^M
May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: CONNECT
May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: send (^M)
May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: expect (netserv)
May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: 26400^M
May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: MindSpring Dialup Service^M
May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: ^M
May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: netserv
May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: send ([EMAIL PROTECTED]^M)
May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: expect (Password:)
May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: -130.atl2 (s19) login:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: Password:
May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: send (abcdefg^M)
May 26 08:28:32 localhost pppd[379]: Serial connection established.
May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: Using interface ppp0
May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xa1f838d8> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xa1f838d8> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb5eb588d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb5eb588d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost kernel: PPP BSD Compression module registered
May 26 08:28:35 localhost kernel: PPP Deflate Compression module registered
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate 15>
<deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 00> <addr 168.121.1.1>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 00>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
209.86.53.93>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
209.86.53.93>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x1 80 fd 01 01 00
0f 1a 04 78 00 18 04 78 00 15 03 2f]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <compress VJ>
<addr 168.121.1.1>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x2 <compress
VJ>]
May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
209.86.53.93>]
May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
168.121.1.1>]
May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr
168.121.1.1>]
May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: local IP address 209.86.53.93
May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: remote IP address 168.121.1.1
------------------------------
From: Michael Peppler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Sybase ASE on Linux faq needed
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 07:52:14 -0700
John Bjorgen wrote:
>
> There is a wealth of information at:
> http://sybooks.sybase.com/onlinebooks/group-as/asg1192e
>
And there's an (admittedly) small FAQ at http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler/linux.html.
Michael
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Can someone plese post a faq on Sybase ASE installation in Redhat Linux?
> -snip-
--
Michael Peppler -||- Data Migrations Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -||- http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler
Int. Sybase User Group -||- http://www.isug.com
Sybase on Linux mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
