Linux-Networking Digest #321, Volume #11 Fri, 28 May 99 22:13:43 EDT
Contents:
pppd 1 hour delay (francesco martucci)
Redhat 6.0 & port forwarding ("Jack L Parker")
mail program for shell scripts+smtp server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DNS & /var/adm/messages (mist)
Re: Redhat 6.0 & port forwarding (Hugh Fader)
Re: Telnet problems (mist)
Re: Linux read a win98 floppy? (Armand)
Help: Opportunistic Locks (Bob Dusek)
Re: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests PPP FAILURE! Follow-up (Brandon Edens)
Re: ROOT-access and SSH-login ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: How to setup for Lotus Notes (Les Hazelton)
network printing problem ("R.H.")
Re: 3C574 PCMCIA NIC connectivity (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: ipfwadm - unexpected results (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: Linux read a win98 floppy? (garv)
Re: RedHat 6.0 & ipmasqadm ("Greg Bastian")
Re: pppd fails to establish connection (Clifford Kite)
Modem and Answering Machine ("Thom Caldwell")
Re: 3com 3c900 (Rev. 0) and Redhat 6.0 ("Cliff")
PPP through portmaster using securid ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (francesco martucci)
Subject: pppd 1 hour delay
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 21:59:35 GMT
If I try to connect my isp, and find it 5 times busy, I can't do any
other attempt to connect for 1 hour.
Is it possible to set delay to a lower time, i.e. 5 minutes? How?
Thanks a lot,
Francesco
------------------------------
From: "Jack L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 6.0 & port forwarding
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 16:09:15 -0700
The IPChains how-to says that port forwarding is supported by the 2.2 kernel
but says nothing about how to activate it. Thanks in advance for any
suggestions.
Jack L Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mail program for shell scripts+smtp server
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 16:07:49 -0700
Hello,
I am running a linux machine (redhat 5.2) and
I was wondering if there is a command line program
like /bin/mail that I can plug into shell scripts
to send mail via an the smtp server at my isp.
I didn't see this functionality in either the
mail or the pine man page.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS & /var/adm/messages
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 00:48:50 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ivo Naninck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Hi All,
>
<snip logs>
>
>Does this mean bind cleans its cache every our?
Yes.
>I can't find in the man page how to enlarge this cacheing period.
>Can it be done?
>
I don't know. But you should consider whether you would want to or not.
It's done for a reason because the data in the caches might be old or
incorrect. I'd imagine that the default time is a sensible one. Maybe
you could just limit the logging, then you wouldn't know about it. 8-)
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: Hugh Fader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 & port forwarding
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:15:21 GMT
You use ipmasqadm available at http://www.rpmfind.net.
Let me know if you are able to get game zone games to work with this. I haven't
had any luck.
Jack L Parker wrote:
> The IPChains how-to says that port forwarding is supported by the 2.2 kernel
> but says nothing about how to activate it. Thanks in advance for any
> suggestions.
>
> Jack L Parker
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet problems
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 00:53:42 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Hi folks.
>
<snip>
>
>However, I cannot telnet on the Linux box from Windows. Telnetd is running,
>since under Linux I can telnet to localhost and log in. If I telnet from the
>Windows PC, I get the System message:
>
>"RedHat Linux 6
>on an i586 etc."
>
>But no log in prompt.
Is there *never* a login prompt, or does it just take a long time to
turn up? If there is never a prompt, it might be that you have
/etc/hosts.deny and /etc/hosts.allow conspiring to stop your windows box
logging in. Add the windows' box IP to hosts allow like -
in.telnetd : win.box.dotted.ip
If there is a *slow* login prompt (2 - 3 mins probably) then you need
reverse resolution. Put the IP and name of the windows box into
/etc/hosts on the Linux box -
win.box.dotted.ip winboxname
>From the books that I have got, I think that I need to
>set up pseudo-terminals (pty s), but none of the docs (HOWTOs etc.) seem to
>mention how I should do this. The telnetd man page mentions a pty man page
>that doesn't seem to exist.
>
I shouldn't think that that would be a problem unless Redhat 6 is set up
very differently to 5.2 by default. You may not be able to log in
directly as root, but that's another story..
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Armand)
Subject: Re: Linux read a win98 floppy?
Date: 28 May 1999 23:54:50 GMT
Reply-To: address_below
In article <7ilcmj$scj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to mount a floppy in RedHat 6 that will allow it to read a
> Win98 floppy?
mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
should work because mount works out for itself what fs there is on your
diskette. It may be that your kernel is not configured for vfat, in which case
you should recompile it with support for vfat, or , in the RH case, probably
choose a different kernel with support for vfat.
Armand
--
messages to aqrqmanqdw at xsq4all (dot) nl
remove the q's
=================��������������������===================
- Stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal!! -
- Copy these 3 sentences to your own sig. -
- http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm -
=================��������������������===================
http://mojo.calyx.net/~refuse/mumia/index.html
------------------------------
From: Bob Dusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Help: Opportunistic Locks
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:06:05 -0500
Hello,
I've been doing some reading on opportunistic locks and I think I
understand them. First, I will attempt to explain my understanding of
them, then I'll give you my question:
Opportunistic locks, from what I understand, allow client machines to
"aggresively" cache files locally. The documentation I've read says
that sometimes a client even caches open/close file operations... in
other words, it doesn't (necessarily) even tell the server it's
closing a file. It just closes it, since it's got the file locked,
w/opportunistic locking. For the purpose of continuing my explanation,
I'll call this client "Client Lock".
This local cacheing is permitted by the server, because whenever another
client tries to access the file, the server knows who has the file
locked (Client Lock) and it sends a message to Client Lock, saying
"Hey! Give me your updates, someone else needs that file!"
It is in this manner that the server "breaks" the lock.
Now, according to this explanation... if I were to open a file on a
Microsoft SMB client and make changes to the file, saving it
periodically, and if I were to open the same file on a Linux machine,
which accesses the file via NFS, and edit it.... then the SMB client
wouldn't necessarily see the changes that I made to the file via my NFS
client. In fact, from what I understand, since the server's lock
information for the file wouldn't change ('cause NFS doesn't manipulate
the opportunistic locks) the SMB client WOULD NOT see the changes that
are made to the file via NFS.
However, when I actually try to test this hypothesis, I get a
surprise... the smb client sees every change that I make to a file via
an NFS client. What gives? Could I have opportunistic locks turned
off? I've looked in our smb.conf file and there is not any "oplocks =
off" or anything like that. And, the documentation says that it is
turned on by default. Also -- the documentation says that "kernel
oplocks" is not yet implemented for Linux (which would allow NFS to
"break" opportunistic locks).
Could someone lend me a hand? We want all of our users to maintain only
1 directory structure, and we want to prevent data corruption (but we
can't guarantee that our users will never be accessing their files via
NFS and SMB). If necessary, we may have to "smbmount" the file system
from Linux... but, I'd rather hold off on that, if "kernel oplocks" is
going to be implemented soon....
Thanks,
Bob
--
Saint Joseph's College -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.saintjoe.edu
=======================================================================
Always the dullness of the fool is the whetstone of the wits.
-- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brandon Edens)
Subject: Re: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests PPP FAILURE! Follow-up
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 00:12:55 GMT
Thanks for the continued help:
More developments have arisen. I have been checking the /var/log/ppp
(forgot that the ubc.ca linux-ppp setup webpage setup the dump to
file) and I found I ran a grep for recvd and found that on one
occasion (Edgenet not MSN) my pppd actually received data. However,
that occured on the one time when I did not log in via text.
The command was:
/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 57600 connect "/usr/sbin chat -v ''
ATD2991000 CONNET '\d\c' "
Here is the log file:
May 28 14:58:46 Zeos pppd[821]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
May 28 14:58:47 Zeos chat[822]: send (ATD8541000^M)
May 28 14:58:47 Zeos chat[822]: expect (CONNECT)
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: ATD8541000^M^M
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: CARRIER 50000^M
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: ^M
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: PROTOCOL: LAP-M^M
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: ^M
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: CONNECT
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: -- got it
May 28 14:59:12 Zeos chat[822]: send (\d)
May 28 14:59:13 Zeos pppd[821]: Serial connection established.
May 28 14:59:13 Zeos pppd[821]: Using interface ppp0
May 28 14:59:13 Zeos pppd[821]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
May 28 14:59:14 Zeos pppd[821]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0
xd808901> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 28 14:59:15 Zeos pppd[821]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0
xd808901> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 28 14:59:17 Zeos pppd[821]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0
xd808901> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 28 14:59:45 Zeos last message repeated 9 times
May 28 14:59:48 Zeos pppd[821]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
May 28 14:59:48 Zeos pppd[821]: Connection terminated.
May 28 14:59:48 Zeos pppd[821]: Connect time 0.6 minutes.
May 28 14:59:48 Zeos pppd[821]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
May 28 14:59:48 Zeos pppd[821]: Exit.
All of the other ISPs present only the sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 msg
and then give a repeated last command 9 times msg. This occurs
regardless if I login via the text or not.. I've been experimenting
with the different LCP commands but have had 0 luck with this. If
someone could give me some tips or ideas anything would be
appreciated..
Thanks again,
Natan (Brandon Edens [EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ROOT-access and SSH-login
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:22:48 GMT
On Fri, 28 May 1999 21:39:42 GMT, Nicholas E Couchman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Remote logins (meaning that you are not sitting at the console), are
>disabled for user ids under 10. Since the root user id is 0, remote
>access for the root user is not allowed. I don't believe there is anyway
>to change this. You can, if you know the root password, do the
>following:
>1)Login in using a normal userid
>2)type the command : 'su root'
>3)you will be prompted for the root password. Enter the password and you
>are given root permissions. This means you can install, uninstall, start
>/sbin programs, do everything the root can do, except check the root
>email. You have to be sitting at the console logged in as root to read
>and check root email.
I can remember the old S.u.S.e 5.2 times... There was directly
remote login for root possible! (I think it was the entry pty* in
/etc/securetty - but I'm not sure...)
What the problem is:
*root access should permitted only for a specific host
*mail clients cannot login as a user and perform su, cause of
pop3
I think there must be a way...
Thanx for your readiness to help!
Erkan
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 00:40:34 +0000
From: Les Hazelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to setup for Lotus Notes
Tero Niemi wrote:
>
> I've got little LAN with 4 win-machines, which should be able to use
> Lotus Notes on external server.
> What should I do in order to get it work? Do I need some specific
> ip_masq module? Please help ASAP.
My home office system has Linux Mandrake (RedHat +) with kernel 2.2.8 as
the dial in ppp gateway with a local lan connected Win95 system on the
back end. I run Lotus notes 4.6.1 on the Win95 system connecting to my
employers Lotus Notes serveres. This has been working for my day-to-day
office work environment for the past several months.
My IP forwarding statements are in /etc/rc.d/rc.local. See below:
======== clip ===========
# pasted in for IP Masq
echo "ip_masq 192.168.1.1"
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq*
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
# end of paste
========== end of clip ==========
Works for me. Hope it helps you.
--
Les Hazelton
============================================
Eeny, Meeny, Jelly Beanie, the spirits are about to speak!
-- Bullwinkle Moose
------------------------------
From: "R.H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: network printing problem
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 17:48:29 -0700
I have a Linksys EPSX3 print server with 3 parallel ports. It works
acceptable in win98, but in Linux I have problems. I was able to finally
get it set up using the samba LanManager setup in printtool. Now, it does
print, but if it is more than a page or two, it will either not print those
pages at all, print the pages in the wrong order (say you have 5 pages, it
prints pages 2 and 3 only), or sometimes you just get a mess printed on the
page. Does anyone know how to fix this or if I might need a switch instead
of a hub or if I need to reduce the speed of my network from 100X to 10X. I
only have 2 PCs and a printserver connected to my hub using the correct
network cabling for 100X.
Thanks,
Roger
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: 3C574 PCMCIA NIC connectivity
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:28:05 GMT
On Thu, 27 May 1999 17:37:59 -0700, C. David Wilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I have a Toshiba Tecra 8000 dual booting with WinblowZ 95 and RedHat 6.0. I
>have finally gotten the pcmcia module working and seeing the 3C574 NIC that
>I have, but it will not connect to the network and I cannot get a DHCP
>assigned address. Here is what I have done so far:
>
>The first thing that I did was to change the order of the startup in rc5.d
>I change it so that the pcmcia service starts before the networking service.
>Now eth0 is binding to the Card and the link light is turning on, but when I
>have it set to get a DHCP address it says that it is attempting to get the
>IP information for the card and times out. BTW I have been using linuxconf
Here's what I'd try. Wait till the configuration times out and
nothing more is happening. Then do these things (all as root, of
course).
ifconfig
should only show your loopback device
route -n
should only show your loopback device's route (1 line)
Now run dhcpcd manually:
/sbin/dhcpcd -d
When this completes, run "ifconfig" again and see what you get.
Also do "ls -al /etc/dhcpc" and see the dates and times of those
files - at least the ones starting with dhcp should be new
(created pretty soon after you ran dhcpcd).
If dhcpcd doesnt come back for a long time (and you've checked the usual
suspects - like wiring!) or if it comes back but ifconfig doesnt show eth0 up
and configured or "ls -al /etc/dhcpc" doesnt show any (new) files, then look
at /var/log/messages - that's what the "-d" option is for.
If this works, then all you really have to do is dink around with the scripts
to make this happen. Not a big problem, if you understand what's going on.
Main thing to remember there: if cardmgr seems to hang as soon as you insert
the eth card, change the line that calls dhcpcd to look like this:
dhcpcd >/dev/console 2>&1
That's needed in order for cardmgr to realise that dhcpcd has cut loose.
Good luck.
(PS - I've got my 3c574 to work alright, but not *reliably*. Often, it will
stop responding, and stop dead. It got so bad I'm using an older card now).
(PPS - Just for one week I was at a place with a 100bT network, and it ran the
whole week no problems. So maybe the problem is only on the 10bT one...? I
cant be sure - no 100bT where I am now! So if you have 100bT I'd appreciate
some feedback)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: ipfwadm - unexpected results
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:28:08 GMT
On Thu, 27 May 1999 19:37:47 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'll work on allowing services later. Using configuration A below, I
>can see the Internet just fine from inside stations, but I can still
>telnet (23) to the external address a.b.c.d from an outside source
>(using a modem connection to my ISP from another machine), even though
>the firewall is supposed to block everything. Why am I able to do that?
>What needs to be changed? As I said, I have two external interfaces to
>deal with, eth1 and ppp0. I don't have my DSL line for eth1 yet, so I'm
>using ppp0 for testing. Do I have to tell ipfwadm what interface to use?
>
>Configuration A:
>#IP forwarding is enabled
>ipfwadm -F -f
>ipfwadm -I -f
>ipfwadm -O -f
>ipfwadm -F -p deny
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -P tcp -D 0.0.0.0/0
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -P udp -D 0.0.0.0/0
untested, but try something like:
ipfwadm -I -a deny -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D <your ppp0 IP address>/32 23 -W ppp0
You see, when you telnet to your gateway machine from outside, you
are not exercising the -F part of your rules, and thats the only
one for which you have -p deny set.
You are using the -I part when you do that, and that very likely
has a default accept.
You DONT want to change that to -p deny ;-) It has to be rule
based.
Anyway - I'm not entirely sure I gave you the "complete" answer -
just a pointer in th right direction. Read the HOW-TO, especially
the huge example.
A better way to control this is tcp_wrappers anyway - you may want
to consider that too.
------------------------------
From: garv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux read a win98 floppy?
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 17:34:10 -0700
Armand wrote:
> In article <7ilcmj$scj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there any way to mount a floppy in RedHat 6 that will allow it to read a
> > Win98 floppy?
> mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
If you have kernel 2.0.36 or later,
In your /etc/fstab under /dev/fd0 add:
/dev/fd0 /mnt/vfat vfat user,noauto,exec 0 0
make the dir /mnt/vfat
(add the user,noauto,exec to floppy and cdrom to allow all users to use devices).
then just insert WinDOS disk and do:
mount /mnt/vfat
presto chango
------------------------------
From: "Greg Bastian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat 6.0 & ipmasqadm
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 09:38:04 +1000
Hi All,
Yes, I am now using IPCHAINS and IPMASQADM PORTFW.
My commands look exactly as they should as per all the readme's and ipmasq
howto.
It seems that packets are received at the external interface (which is being
forwarded to the internal network), but the replies are not going back to
the source.
Have I blocked off something ?
The only masquerading and port forwarding commands are :
ipchains -I forward -p tcp -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQ
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 203.11.21.8 80 -R 192.168.0.5 80
I have enabled debugging by doing
echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_masq_debug
but I don't get anything in syslog.
Greg.
Greg Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ilaob$139b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> I have set up a machine with RH 6 to act as a masquerading router between
> two networks.
>
> I have the masq'ing working well, but I cannot get ipmasqadm and portfw
> working at all.
>
> I can't find where to turn on debugging. It seems the request from an
> outside client to the external interface (which is being port forwarded)
> doesn't get forwarded on the masq'ing router, even though ip_forwarding is
> enabled.
>
> Any ideas anyone ?
>
> Greg.
>
>
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: pppd fails to establish connection
Date: 28 May 1999 20:02:29 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have been trying to get pppd to connect to my office LAN from home,
: without success.
: I have a Toshiba laptop with RedHat Linux 5.2 freshly installed on it.
: The PCMCIA works fine, since I am able to connect to the office modem.
: I have to use PAP when connecting to the LAN from Win95 (Dial-up
: networking works fine on the same machine). I have successfully
: connected to ISP's who don't use PAP.
<snip>
May 28 23:18:55 localhost pppd[289]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1522>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e> <magic
0x5c7ca7af> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f2> < 12 02> < 13 09 03 00 80 d3 29 38
e0>]
Above is a request from the peer for you to use SPAP authentication.
The ConfRej below is fatal since the peer apparently isn't configured
to offer any alternative. There might be a small chance that adding
the pppd option <refuse-chap> will cause pppd to Nak SPAP and offer
PAP.
SPAP is Shiva PAP which is "patented" and so unavailable to pppd. I think
that SPAP _is_ implemented in Win95 PPP. Bummer.
: May 28 23:18:55 localhost pppd[289]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05
: f2> < 12 02> < 13 09 03 00 80 d3 29 38 e0>]
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: "Thom Caldwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Modem and Answering Machine
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 17:12:11 -0700
Is it possible to set up a standard modem to just monitor the phone line for
a data connection, letting an answer machine pick up the line, then cutting
it off if a data connection is present? I want to be able to dial into my
linux machine without dedicating a phone line to it.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com 3c900 (Rev. 0) and Redhat 6.0
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 01:50:38 GMT
I've seen the same problem on a Packard Bell with a 3Com 905b. Linux ran
fine in spite of it. Since the mobo chip set had a work around written for
it (saw that in the kernel configurator) I figured it was a PCI problem on
the mobo and not the NIC. Don't know if that helps you though.
--
-Cliff
Views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
Concordia Net, Inc. When replying via email please use; cwheat at concordia
dot net not
root@localhost
Peter Bekatoros wrote in message <7imoln$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On bootup (and then after) I'm receiving the following message:
>
>eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status e601.
>eth0: Interrupt posted but not delivered - IRQ blocked by another device?
>
>I've checked my logs as well as /proc/interrupts and the nic is definitely
>receiving an interrupt. Module 3c59x is loading correctly too. I've tried
>changing the first available IRQ in the BIOS as well as moving the card
>around and still get the same message. The PNP OS bios setting is disabled
>also. If I don't ifdown the nic, I eventually get a core dump. The only
>other card in the system is an ATI Mach64 VT PCI card.
>
>System: DFI VPM586 Dual Pentium (133x2)
> VLSI Chipset
> CMD 646 rev. 1 IDE Controller
> 64M Ram
> 3.2 Gig EIDE HD
>
>Anybody have any ideas? The card worked fine under Redhat 5.1 (2.0.34)
>
>Thanks,
>
>Pete Bekatoros ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Fresh Meadow Mechanical Corp.
>
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: PPP through portmaster using securid
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 01:45:36 GMT
I need a way to feed a securid token to the chat program when it logs
in. Either a chat-like program that can pop up an X window to get the
token or a new way to start ppp. I have been editing the chat script
and calling ifup, but by the time it dials up and log in, the token is
sometimes expired.
Anyone know of such a beast.
TIA
--
Tony Lill, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
President, A. J. Lill Consultants fax/data (519) 650 3571
539 Grand Valley Dr., Cambridge, Ont. N3H 2S2 (519) 241 2461
=============== http://www.ajlc.waterloo.on.ca/ ================
"Welcome to All Things UNIX, where if it's not UNIX, it's CRAP!"
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
