Linux-Networking Digest #353, Volume #11 Mon, 31 May 99 18:13:46 EDT
Contents:
Re: two webserver at 1 IP (Paul Schultz)
autodial for IP masq (Brian Witowski)
dhcpd error (Alex Schneider)
CALL ME NOW !!! 1-473-408-8317 ("MONEY")
Re: Redhat 6.0 and Qpopper. (Mark Olbert)
DLINK DE-528CT Driver in linux ("Noah Lively")
POP-server (Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder)
Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel? (bryan)
Re: twisted pair problem using a hub (bryan)
Re: DNS server problems ("Carl R. Friend")
Re: error: pppd died unexpectedly (Colin McQueen)
Help on setting up network card ( GENIUS 2500III PCI Ethernet Adapter ) (" Thay
Sothun")
Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel? (Johan Kullstam)
Re: Repost: no help after 3 days: Windows NT to Linux over PPP and Samba (Bill Unruh)
Re: Samba configuration help.... ("James Gardner")
Re: Sendmail can't start in RH (Jim)
Re: Clear out the route table? (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: PPP error (Frank Hahn)
Re: error when sending mail (Frank Hahn)
Albuquerque ISP w/ Linux dialup support? (Bill Bohling)
WD 8013 NIC: Strange networking failure (Rohan Oberoi)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Schultz)
Subject: Re: two webserver at 1 IP
Date: 31 May 1999 02:55:03 -0500
correction to my post: redir is just something that was bundled in with
the slinux dist, didn't mean to imply that it was by the slinux authors..
please save the flaming :)
grab redir at: http://users.qual.net/~sammy/hacks/
Paul
On 31 May 1999 01:08:38 -0500, Paul Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 30 May 1999, Eugene Strulyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I believe you need a real IP address to run a web server.
>
>Not really, there's various utilities out there like ipautofw and slinux to
>take the input of a specific tcp port on one machine and direct it to another.
>
>with the slinux utils you would just do:
>
>redir --lport 100 --caddr=10.0.0.2 --cport 80
>
>that would take anything coming in on port 100 and throw it to the NT server's
>port 80.. You ofcourse need good old IP Masquerading configured on the linux
>machine so traffic coming from your inside web server can make it out.
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>Han van Hulst wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it posible to have two webservice 1 on a NT machine and 1 on a Linux
>>> machine?
>>>
>>> My gateway is a linux machine with 2 network card's
>>> 62.108.18.137 netmask 255.255.254.0 (outside world)
>>> 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 (inside world)
>>>
>>> Second webserver NT machine.
>>> 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 (inside world)
>>>
>>> I am trying to get the linux machine on port 62.108.18.137:80 (default)
>>> and the other on 62.108.18.137.100 (demo server)
>>>
>>> I have IPChains running under linux RedHad 5.2.
>>>
>>> Is it posible to chain 62.108.18.137:100 to 10.0.0.2:(100 or 80)
>>>
>>> greeting
>>>
>>> Han van Hulst
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: autodial for IP masq
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 12:13:51 -0400
Greetings,
I have seen reference to using 'chat' as a method for autodialing on my
Linux firewall. I have looked at the /sbin/request-route file but don't
have a clue as to how to set things up. I've even looked for a HOW-TO
but can't seem to find one.
One individual suggested diald but after looking at the docs etc, it
just seems that there has to be an easier way to get auto dial.
Thanks!
Brian
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Schneider)
Subject: dhcpd error
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 22:11:16 +0200
I have a ral problem with isc dhcp running Suse Linux 6.1: It says:
CONFIG_PAKET and CONFIG_FILTER are not installed in my Kernel config and
then the daemon aborts.
Any Ideas ???
Thanks !
alex
------------------------------
From: "MONEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.misc
Subject: CALL ME NOW !!! 1-473-408-8317
Date: Monday, 31 May 1999 09:22:51 -0600
Reply-To: SEXY MAN
I am waiting for u ...... (HOT BABE)
1-473-408-8317
PHONE - 1-473-408-8317 - NOW
Hu\x%
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Olbert)
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 and Qpopper.
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 19:10:51 GMT
On Fri, 28 May 1999 18:03:58 GMT, Dave Wasilka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Im having a heck of a time trying to install Qpopper.. i got an RPM of
>the latest release but i just get an error when i try to install it...
>when i compiled and try running it i can never connect to it.. when i
>telnet to it as the installation info recommends to test it says
>connection refused??? I have been fighting with it for some time now and
>have no idea where to start..
I'm new at this, but I had problems running qpopper also. My problem,
which sounds similar to yours, was caused by me not having a user
called 'pop' on my system. The default version of qpopper expects this
user to be the administrator for qpopper (I think).
- Mark
------------------------------
From: "Noah Lively" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DLINK DE-528CT Driver in linux
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 12:24:05 -0000
Dear all,
I'm having trouble getting my D-Link linux driver for the above card to work
under Redhat 6.0 (kernel 2.2.5). The driver was written for Linux kernel
version 1.2.xx. How do I update the driver?
I actually got the driver to compile and everything, but I can't use the
card.
Has anyone had the same problem?
Thanx,
Noah Lively
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder)
Subject: POP-server
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 16:31:03 GMT
Hullo there!
Anybody out there aware of a POP3-Server that does not require inetd
to be running? I would rather not have inetd if it were possible
otherwise (I want to have as few active programs as possible as to
simplify configuration.)
Greets from over there
Dagurashibanipal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus!=20
Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 16:24:53 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > In comp.os.linux.development.system Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > : On 10 May 1999 20:54:51 -0400, Johan Kullstam
: > : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >
: > : >
: > : >is 100Mbps supposed to work with a cross-over cable?
: >
: > of course. cat5 spec.
: >
: >
: > >when i got my
: > : >gear at a computer show, i was advised to get a hub for the fast
: > : >ethernet.
: >
: > computer SHOW. meaning SALES? I wonder if that had anything to do
: > with it? ;-)
: it didn't. the computer show had many vendors.
: one of my friends from work was working there and sold me a system
: (mobo case cpu mem). he then pointed me at the card guy from whom i
: bought a scsi adapter and a couple of tulips. the friend advised me
: to get a hub too. he didn't sell hubs so had no interest in selling
: me more stuff than i would need.
: > if you have more than 2 stations, a xover cable won't be sufficient.
: > but for a pt-pt connection with just 2 stations, a hub will be slower
: > than a wire. and more expensive, too ;-)
: yes. perhaps i'll get a cross-over cable one of these days.
the term 'hub' generally implies collision domains (not always, but
more often than not). 'switch' usually means that each PHY port is
its own datalink (layer-2). having its own MAC (and its own counters
if its managable). sometimes even its own IP addr. and usually many
more $$$ in cost.
there are, of course, hybrids. the bay networks 10/100 'hub' is a
2-port bridge ('switch') with 2 collision domains: one strip for 10
and one for 100. when a device is plugged in, its a member of either
of those domains. the two domains are 'switched' since they can't
directly be on the same exact collision domain (the timing is not the
same between 10 and 100). this device is probably the best compromise
between functionality and cost (its about $100). if you have to join
10 and 100 devices, this would be an economical way.
if you only have to join 2 devices, the BEST (always) is a crossover cable.
--
Bryan
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: twisted pair problem using a hub
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 16:28:18 GMT
Heiko Hellweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: do you have any hints for me concerning the following problem?
: i have a small two-machine network at home, consisting of an
: intel pc with linux kernel 2.0.36 with a 3com 3c905b ethernet card
: and an old apple powermac 7200 running linuxPPC (kernel 2.2.4, pre-R5)
: with its built in 10MBit ethernet.
: When connecting them directly with a patch caple, everything runs
: smoothly. Since i want to connect another machine, i recently bought
: a samll 10 MBit Hub and now all the smoothness went away. As soon as
: more than just a little traffic occurs (say a ftp file transfer of a
: 1MB file, no matter which direction) i get lots of frame collisions
: (that may be acceptable) which result in 5 to 10 second delays in
: which no network traffic can pass the ethernet at all ... :-(
sounds like race conditions. I've seen it with some nics that have
buffering/timing issues. my tulip doesn't behave well with 2.2 kernel
and 2.0 kernels both going at full speed ftp. I've seen long
multi-second pauses before.
: Do you have any idea, what to check, where to tweak, what to read, ...?
: thanks in advance - Heiko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (yes: its a real address)
I wish I knew. I ended up taking the tulip out of my box and putting
an eepro100 in, for the 2.2 system. for 2.0.36, tulip seems quite
stable for me.
sometimes its easier to switch to hardware that works well (with
drivers that are clean) than to tear your hair out trying to figure
out exactly why ;-)
--
Bryan
------------------------------
From: "Carl R. Friend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS server problems
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 12:27:07 -0400
Karl Sarnow wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I tried to setup a DNS server according to the literature. It
> seems the server does not work:
>
> bash-2.02# nslookup
> *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.2: Non-existent
> host/domain
> Default Server: koeln.shuttle.de
> Address: 194.95.247.252
Since the entire 192.168.x.y address range is defined as "private
space" by IANA, you'll have to serve the 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa zone
on your machine. This implies, of course, deploying a DNS server in
your own zone and keeping from "leaking" to the outside world.
What you're seeing is your ISP's server, koeln.shuttle.de, denying
the request on the grounds that _it_ doesn't know of the
0.168.192.in-addr.arpa zone and then receiving notification from the
root servers that it's "blackholed". In those networks, it's assumed
that the admins will set up a private DNS for the local network and
forward (or address translate) to get "outside" onto the "public"
network.
--
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~crfriend/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------
From: Colin McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: error: pppd died unexpectedly
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 19:14:26 GMT
Reply-To: Colin McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <7ik8kq$jvr$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Nevyn"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1)when is it expected to die?...d:o) scary thought...
> 2)...this happens when i try to connect to freeserve using the gnome
> ppp
> dialup thing......
> 3)if i use minicom it dials, askes for username an password, accepts
> them
> waits a min or so...then dies....
> i've set everything up right i think, used the linux for dummmies
> book,
> +some from the ppp howto, cant remember which was last.....please
> help...anyone.....
>
Isn't it set up to disconnect after 1 minute or 30 seconds by default ? So
if you are not using the connection it kills itself. Not unexpected but
reported that way. If you are using Kppp you can change the inactivity tome
somewhere on the setup.
Did you click on the details button. It hints there what the problem may
be.
--
Colin McQueen : Network Manager at The Romsey School
Web : http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/cmcqueen/
http://www.romseyschool.org.uk/
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: " Thay Sothun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help on setting up network card ( GENIUS 2500III PCI Ethernet Adapter )
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:34:11 +0700
Hi,
Does anybody knows how do I installed network card called Genius LAN
GE2500III PCI Ethernet Adapter. I could not installed it during the
installation process since Linux listed me not the one I have.
Any idea would be much appreciated.
Best regards,
Sothun
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 31 May 1999 12:06:27 -0400
bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In comp.os.linux.development.system Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : On 10 May 1999 20:54:51 -0400, Johan Kullstam
> : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : >
> : >is 100Mbps supposed to work with a cross-over cable?
>
> of course. cat5 spec.
>
>
> >when i got my
> : >gear at a computer show, i was advised to get a hub for the fast
> : >ethernet.
>
> computer SHOW. meaning SALES? I wonder if that had anything to do
> with it? ;-)
it didn't. the computer show had many vendors.
one of my friends from work was working there and sold me a system
(mobo case cpu mem). he then pointed me at the card guy from whom i
bought a scsi adapter and a couple of tulips. the friend advised me
to get a hub too. he didn't sell hubs so had no interest in selling
me more stuff than i would need.
> if you have more than 2 stations, a xover cable won't be sufficient.
> but for a pt-pt connection with just 2 stations, a hub will be slower
> than a wire. and more expensive, too ;-)
yes. perhaps i'll get a cross-over cable one of these days.
--
J o h a n K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Repost: no help after 3 days: Windows NT to Linux over PPP and Samba
Date: 31 May 1999 17:03:59 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karel Geeraert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>1) Both connecting from my desktop under Linux and under NT, I only get
>connected at a speed of 33600. Ideally I would like to be able to dial-in
That is the maximum speed that you can get. The so called 56K
connections REQUIRE that one side be connected to the phone lines
directly with a digital modem (not a 56K modem) AND then only the link
from that side to the other can run at 53K. The return link is 33K
always. If neither side has a digital modem, then the max rate both ways
is 33K.
>2) If I dial-in from under NT with a dial-up. I get ppp established, but that
>is all there is. I do not see any network traffic between the client and the
What evidence do you have the ppp is actually established?
run pppd debug on the Linux box. look at the output of the negotiation.
>server. If I do a PING from the server at that moment to the client, I get
>only CRC errors. If I try to telnet from the client to the server, I can only
>get a connection during the first two seconds of the established PPP
>connection. Could it be some IP conflict? But which one?
>These networking settings do work if I connect through the ethernet
>interfaces. Do I need to have a different IP setting of the client for my
>dial-up connection and for my ethernet connection. I do not intend to use
>them simultaneously.
NO, but your routing could be screwed up. The linux box has to know
whether to send the packet down the ppp line of the ethernet. YOu could
be confusing it. ( route -n on the Linux machine.)
------------------------------
From: "James Gardner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba configuration help....
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 10:16:14 -0700
I did disable them in Win98 via the registry. Now I'm able to see linux
shares.
Thanks,
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vlad Petersen wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>James Gardner wrote:
>>
>> I have Win98, WinNT 4.0 (SP3) and Red Hat 5.2. I am having the same
problems
>> seeing Samba shares on the linux box from both the above machines.
However I
>> can see the Samba Shares from a Win 95 (FAT16) machine.
>
>Have you enabled encrypted passwds on Samba or disabled them in Windows?
>Win95 do not require password encryption hence you can see the shares
>from a Win95 system but 98 and NT do.
>
>--
>Vlad Petersen | <vladimip at uniserve dot com>
>Vancouver, BC | *Good pings come in small packets*
> SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim)
Subject: Re: Sendmail can't start in RH
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 16:38:21 GMT
>Hi Kelvin,
>you wrote:
>> I found that the sendmail stop after a while when the system start, when
>> I look at the log in /var/log/maillog, it shows:
>>
>> ==============================================================
>> May 15 09:21:45 CX346166-A sendmail[668]: problem creating SMTP socket
>> May 15 09:21:50 CX346166-A sendmail[668]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root):
>> opendaemonsocket: cannot bind: Address already in use
>[...]
>> and here is my /etc/inetd.conf
>[...]
>> smtp stream tcp nowait root /usr/bin/smtpd smtpd
>
>Comment out above line. Else inetd does listen on port 25 (smtp) and
>does try to start smtpd when a connection is established.
You give good answers so I'm rewarding you with a question <grin>.
I have a home network and use windows for all my mail. I want to
install my linux redhat 5.2 for just a local intranet web and not use
it for mail.
SENDMAIL is giving me an error and takes a long time to time out.
I'd like to not use it at all on the linux box at this time. How do I
disable it?
Jim
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Clear out the route table?
Date: 31 May 1999 20:47:33 GMT
Geoffrey L. Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This works if I know all of the entries in the route table to begin
> with. meaning if I was doing this by hand (manually) I could accomplish
> my task. I am looking for an automated way (script) to completely
> rebuild the route table for a given NIC (or eth0 in my case) regardless
> of its current state.
You can turn the interface down and set it up, that will do the trick.
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comm.internet.routing
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
Date: 31 May 1999 20:45:45 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Wolfgang Zweimueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was ich im Kalender habe, heisst: Dokumentation aktuell halten.
Jepp, das ist genau der Punkt. Zum Glueck wird das Problem mit grossen
geswitchten und durch VLANS getrennten Segmenten aber deutlich besser. Und
IP switches sind auch ein richtiger Schritt in diese Richtung. Router haben
in (nicht zwischen) den heutigen breitbandigen Netzen weitgehend ausgedient.
Gruss
Bernd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP error
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 17:42:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 31 May 1999 02:00:19 -0500, Sooyong Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I tried installing Red Hat Linux v6.0 on a Pentium PC for the first
>time.
>I made scripts for PPP as shown on manual, but couldn't make it.
>The error messages from /var/log/messages are
>
>modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
>modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-26
>modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-24
>
Try searching http://www.deja.com. This has come up many times
and is easily resolved. Basically, you modify your /etc/modules.conf
file.
--
Frank Hahn
Travel important today; Internal Revenue men arrive tomorrow.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: error when sending mail
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 17:42:33 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 May 1999 14:22:59 GMT, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>when i use pine to send mail it shows me the error at the bottom
>Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 Cannot open DBM database /etc/virtus
>
>but the mode of the /etc/virtusertable* are already 777
>any idea? thx
>
Just guessing, but has the virtusertable been converted to the
proper format with the makemap command?
I don't use this feature but I do use a genericstable.
The command is something like:
# makemap hash /etc/genericstable < /etc/genericstable
This creates a genericstable.db file in the /etc directory.
Something else to look at is if the name of the file sendmail
is looking for is spelled correctly.
--
Frank Hahn
Economists state their GNP growth projections to the nearest tenth of a
percentage point to prove they have a sense of humor.
-- Edgar R. Fiedler
------------------------------
From: Bill Bohling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Albuquerque ISP w/ Linux dialup support?
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:51:33 -0600
I'm looking for an ISP in Albuquerque who has support for Linux
dialups. My current ISP hasn't been able to provide me with a working
Linux script, and I'm really not into trying to hack my way in. I've
been trying, using W.G. Unruh's fine document and other Hot-Tos, but
I've been unsuccessful so far and no longer have the time to spend. I
am but a simple web developer who just wants to use Linux instead of
Windoze, I don't want to stay on top of modem programming and PAP
quirks.
thanks,
Bill
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rohan Oberoi)
Subject: WD 8013 NIC: Strange networking failure
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 17:10:14 GMT
Thanks to all who replied to tell me that it's perfectly normal for
the wd.c driver to report an I/O address of (say) 310 when the card is
at 300.
The 8013W card still won't ping anything, and I'm beginning to suspect
it's just not compatible with the computer (Compaq Prolinea 486DX/50).
(I would try to change the Compaq's BIOS settings, but pressing F10 or
anything else at boot time just brings up angry beeping noises, and
doesn't stop the computer from going ahead and booting. If anyone
knows how I might get into the BIOS, do let me know...)
To try to debug the problem, I put back the two Intel EtherExpress
cards that work fine with this computer and verified that both eth0
(external network) and eth1 (internal network) ping fine.
Then I swapped out the eexpress on eth1 (io300, irq10) with one of the
8013W's. Now eth0 still works but eth1 won't ping the other computer
that's on the internal network. I ran linuxconf to try to get it to
persuade the card to play ball, but it didn't work.
In my now rather befuddled state I imagine this means that I've
narrowed down the problem to the SMC card compatability (after all,
the EtherExpress in the same slot at the same IRQ/IO worked fine two
minutes ago). And I have three SMC cards that I've been
interchanging, so it seems unlikely that all of them are defective;
besides, they are detected fine at boot time.
I don't see how it could be a driver problem as the SMC EZSETUP
utility reports these cards as 8013W, and I'm using the wd driver
which finds the card at system startup.
In case anyone sees anything I've missed that would explain why the
SMC's aren't working, here's the output of dmesg, ifconfig, route -n
and netstat -a. I'm going back to the EtherExpress's for now, but
would really like to hear from anyone who thinks he knows how to get
the SMC's working! :)
Regards,
Rohan.
(please remove TAKETHISOUT from my address if replying by email).
====================================================== dmesg
Memory: sized by int13 088h
Console: 16 point font, 400 scans
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25, 1 virtual console (max 63)
Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 24.93 BogoMIPS
Memory: 14932k/16384k available (612k kernel code, 384k reserved, 456k data)
This processor honours the WP bit even when in supervisor mode. Good.
Swansea University Computer Society NET3.035 for Linux 2.0
NET3: Unix domain sockets 0.13 for Linux NET3.035.
Swansea University Computer Society TCP/IP for NET3.034
IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP
Checking 386/387 coupling... Ok, fpu using exception 16 error reporting.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... Ok.
Linux version 2.0.36 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 2.7.2.3) #7 Sun May 30 13:34:06 EDT 1999
Starting kswapd v 1.4.2.2
hda: QUANTUM LPS210A, 201MB w/98kB Cache, CHS=723/15/38
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
eth0: EtherExpress at 0x270, IRQ 5, Interface 10baseT, 32k
eexpress.c: v0.10 04-May-95 John Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
v0.14 19-May-96 Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
v0.15 04-Aug-98 Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wd.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eth1: WD80x3 at 0x300, 00 00 C0 65 20 2B WD8013, IRQ 10,
shared memory at 0xcc000-0xcffff.
Partition check:
hda: hda1 hda2
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
Adding Swap: 16524k swap-space (priority -1)
====================================================== ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:AA:00:40:99:29
inet addr:209.6.194.219 Bcast:209.6.194.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2328 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3331 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x270
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:C0:65:20:2B
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x310 Memory:cc000-d0000
====================================================== route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
209.6.194.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 4 eth0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 2 eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
0.0.0.0 209.6.194.218 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 7 eth0
====================================================== netstat -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 DEFAULT.sbo-smr.m:nterm shell3.shore.net:telnet ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 *:linuxconf *:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 *:telnet *:* LISTEN
udp 0 0 *:syslog *:*
raw 0 0 *:1 *:*
Active UNIX domain sockets (including servers)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node Path
unix 2 [ ] STREAM 522 /dev/log
unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 521
unix 1 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 471 /dev/log
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
