Linux-Networking Digest #367, Volume #11 Tue, 1 Jun 99 17:13:45 EDT
Contents:
Re: I've broken http !?!? (Jim Chisholm)
Re: Mail Retrieval @isp --> 1 pop for a whole company... (Wouter Boussemaere)
Re: Using Linux as a IPX timesync source ("Ken McCord")
Re: Mail Retrieval @isp --> 1 pop for a whole company... ("Jeroen Doorschodt")
Firewall not routing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PPP to ISP fails (Jay)
Re: How can I tell if it is Linux? (David Eno)
Adaptec ANA 62044 (Markus Bisanz)
Quotas (Vincent Ridderikhoff)
Re: IP Masq and Port Forwarding ("Matt Goebel")
Re: Weird PPP Problem (Clifford Kite)
Question: NAT/IP tunelling (Robert Young)
Re: Two PC's one modem ? (Tmack)
IP Chains, IP Masq, and Dial on Demand Problems (Mike Westerfield)
Re: Appletalk ("Lee Vorthman")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim Chisholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I've broken http !?!?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 14:47:18 +0000
==============6E92E06883FEA5EDEAF78074
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Tom Davies wrote:
> I've had a PPP connection (set up using kppp) working perfectly from
> Mandrake 5.3 with a 2.2.5 kernel for months.
>
> Now suddenly I can't access web sites, with either Navigator, lynx or
> the KDE web browser. Navigator gives the most sensible error message,
> and says:
>
> "A network error occurred:
> unable to connect to server (TCP Error: No route to host)
> The server may be down or unreachable."
>
> The funny thing is that ping, FTP, POP3, SMTP, NNTP and so on work fine.
>
> What on earth have I done?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Tom
>
> P.S. ifconfig says:
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> RX packets:313 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:313 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>
> ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
> inet addr:210.8.3.83 P-t-P:203.63.80.147
> Mask:255.255.255.255
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1488 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1
> TX packets:1317 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
Sorry if this sounds obvious but are you sure you aren't using a proxy
server for port 80 that might be down (or non-existant) ?
--
=======================================================
Jim Chisholm
Dalhousie University, Dept. Physics Halifax N.S. Canada
http://electron.phys.dal.ca
Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency Service
Lieutenant #2 Bay Road Station 59
http://www.fire-ems.net/firedept/view/HalifaxNSCA
=======================================================
==============6E92E06883FEA5EDEAF78074
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Tom Davies wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I've had a PPP connection (set up using kppp) working
perfectly from
<br>Mandrake 5.3 with a 2.2.5 kernel for months.
<p>Now suddenly I can't access web sites, with either Navigator, lynx or
<br>the KDE web browser. Navigator gives the most sensible error message,
<br>and says:
<p>"A network error occurred:
<br>unable to connect to server (TCP Error: No route to host)
<br>The server may be down or unreachable."
<p>The funny thing is that ping, FTP, POP3, SMTP, NNTP and so on work fine.
<p>What on earth have I done?
<p>Thanks for any help.
<p>Tom
<p>P.S. ifconfig says:
<p>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
<br> inet addr:127.0.0.1
Mask:255.0.0.0
<br> UP LOOPBACK
RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
<br> RX packets:313
errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
<br> TX packets:313
errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
<br> collisions:0
txqueuelen:0
<p>ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
<br> inet addr:210.8.3.83
P-t-P:203.63.80.147
<br>Mask:255.255.255.255
<br> UP POINTOPOINT
RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
<br> RX packets:1488
errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1
<br> TX packets:1317
errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
<br> collisions:0
txqueuelen:10</blockquote>
Sorry if this sounds obvious but are you sure you aren't using a proxy
server for port 80 that might be down (or non-existant) ?
<pre>--
=======================================================
Jim
Chisholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dalhousie University, Dept. Physics Halifax N.S.
Canada
<A HREF="http://electron.phys.dal.ca">http://electron.phys.dal.ca</A>
Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency Service
Lieutenant #2 Bay Road Station 59
<A
HREF="http://www.fire-ems.net/firedept/view/HalifaxNSCA">http://www.fire-ems.net/firedept/view/HalifaxNSCA</A>
=======================================================</pre>
</html>
==============6E92E06883FEA5EDEAF78074==
------------------------------
From: Wouter Boussemaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Retrieval @isp --> 1 pop for a whole company...
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 16:56:15 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
There is a solution documented,
look at : http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/Offline-Mailing.html
HTH,
Wouter
Herman Willekens wrote:
>
> How should this be done in a decent (easily maintainable) way ?
>
> All mail for company goes into [EMAIL PROTECTED], we are
> running a local sendmail daemon, and mail should be delivered in the
> appropriate mailboxes fi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but actually everything arrives in a big, messy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Free beer for the best solution ...
------------------------------
From: "Ken McCord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux as a IPX timesync source
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 14:19:01 -0400
Load IP on the Netware machine used as your primary NDS server and install a
package called SNTPCLNT. It's shareware ($15 US for us) and it works great!
Ken McCord
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7j177d$skk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi all.
>
>I have a network of Novell servers and other misc things including
>a very nice Linux box running Redhat 5.2. The Linux box keeps time
>by talking to a public ntp server on the internet. I'd like to
>keep the Novell server times by using the Linux box as the timesync
>source. Is this currently possible? If not, I don't mind hacking
>into some code to make it work, I just need a little shove in the
>right direction to get me started. I use the MARS_NWE package and
>I have the sources.
>
>Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
>
>Bing
>
>
>
> ----- Posted via NewsOne.Net: Free Usenet News via the Web -----
> ----- http://newsone.net/ -- Discussions on every subject. -----
> NewsOne.Net prohibits users from posting spam. If this or other posts
>made through NewsOne.Net violate posting guidelines, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Jeroen Doorschodt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Retrieval @isp --> 1 pop for a whole company...
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:57:39 +0200
Use fetchmail. I use a multi-drop-pop3 box for my compagny and it works
great....
Jeroen Doorschodt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herman Willekens heeft geschreven in bericht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>How should this be done in a decent (easily maintainable) way ?
>
>All mail for company goes into [EMAIL PROTECTED], we are
>running a local sendmail daemon, and mail should be delivered in the
>appropriate mailboxes fi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], but actually everything arrives in a big, messy
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Free beer for the best solution ...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Firewall not routing
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 02:49:16 GMT
I have a private network IP 10.0.0.x (hopefully) connected to the
internet trough a Linux firewall with 2 network cards.
On Linux PC, I can ping both the internal (private) and the external
NIC cards. I can even ping any other (internal and external ) IP
present on both networks.
On a client PC of the private network, I can ping the Linux firewall
on both cards, but if I try to ping a different external IP I won't
reach it.
Any suggestion on what I should check in the Linux firewall config?
Tks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jay)
Subject: Re: PPP to ISP fails
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 19:31:02 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems we have similar problem.
See my other post.
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:44:28 +0200, "marc*" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>may you should add the ppp0 protocol
>Under X type netcfg as root and then add ppp0 and fill in the gaps.
>
>marc.
>
>Andy Greenshaw a �crit dans le message <7j103s$5ms$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I am having problems connecting to my ISP from Linux. The dial-in is OK and
>>all initial negotiation is OK, but then my Linux box requests termination
>of
>>the link with "No network protocols running".
>>
>>Below is the relevant contents of the /var/log/messages file.
>>
>>----------------
>>
>>Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
>>Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: registered device ppp0
>>Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop pppd[661]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATE1QV1^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: ATE1QV1^M^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: OK
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATH0^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ATH0^M^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: OK
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: send (ATDT08450796699^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (CONNECT)
>>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: ATDT08450796699^M^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: CONNECT
>>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: expect (ogin:)
>>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: 42666/ARQ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: User Access Verification^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login:
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (???????????????^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (assword:)
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login: ???????????^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: Password:
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (????????????^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (system.)
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Entering PPP mode.^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Async interface address is unnumbered
>>(FastEthernet0)^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Your IP address is 62.136.161.36. MTU is
>>1500 bytes^M
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Header compression will match your
>>system.
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set dbg flags to 70000
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Serial connection established.
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Using interface ppp0
>>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap a0000
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connection terminated.
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
>>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
>>Jun 1 13:33:48 desktop pppd[661]: Exit.
>>
>>--------------------
>>
>>And here is what appears on screen:
>>
>>--------------------
>>
>>
>>Serial connection established.
>>Using interface ppp0
>>Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
>>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x42 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
>><accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c 54 49 4c 49 4e
>>4b>]
>>sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x42 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c
>>54 49 4c 49 4e 4b>]
>>rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
>><accomp>]
>>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
>><accomp>]
>>sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network protocols running"]
>>rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
>>Connection terminated.
>>Connect time 0.1 minutes.
>>
>>-------------------
>>
>>Any help much appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------
Subject: Re: How can I tell if it is Linux?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Eno)
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 18:54:17 GMT
Try telnetting to it.
David Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<01beac5f$370b2360$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Is there anyway to tell if a specific web server is running Linux, or even
>Apache for that matter? What if it isn't a web server.. just a
workstation
>or file server, is there anyway to determine that it is running linux?
>Obviously I could try to telnet to it, but assuming they aren't running
>inetd... How could I tell?
>--DavidM
>
------------------------------
From: Markus Bisanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Adaptec ANA 62044
Date: 1 Jun 1999 19:31:14 GMT
Is there any way to get this card to run under linux ??
Fail-over must work because there is no other reason to buy such a nic.
Anyway, a newby from austria is grateful for any info you can give
thanks :-)
markus
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Vincent Ridderikhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Quotas
Date: 1 Jun 1999 15:36:53 GMT
Hi,
I'm new on quota's (as a matter of fact i'm new at Linux). I want to
automaticly assign a disk quota for every new user I add , is there a
way to do that? I'm using Suse6.1
Thanks in advance,
Greetz Vincent...
:-))
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masq and Port Forwarding
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 15:11:00 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you've compiled the kernel you shouldn't need to compile anything else,
just install the RPM and everything should work.
Aaron Fransen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:94T43.40742$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks for the info. Got the RPM and have it installed now, but I have
> another stupid newbie question. How do I compile it?
>
> I can do the kernel no problem, but I've never had to compile an
individual
> module before. I think I've got all the required support compiled into the
> kernel, but what else might I need?
>
>
> Matt Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7ivc45$54a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > http://www.rpmfind.net/
> > It's on this site along with almost ever rpm you could ever need. I
> believe
> > 4.1.2 is the lastest version. You may need to recompile your kernel to
> get
> > this to work also.
> > Aaron Fransen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:4dz43.40062$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hiya all.
> > >
> > > Here's the deal: I've installed Caldera 2.2 and configured it for
> firewall
> > > (and IP Masq). It uses two NICs...one for the Internet, one for the
> > internal
> > > network.
> > >
> > > I need to pass port 25 through to our internal mail server, but I
> haven't
> > > been able to find the IPMASQADM tool anywhere. The link to the linuxhq
> > site
> > > is down.
> > >
> > > Any ideas where else I could get this?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Weird PPP Problem
Date: 1 Jun 1999 09:45:13 -0500
Frank Yan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I set up my ppp stuff under RH5.2, everything seems fine at first.
: Everything is ok, like ping, telnet, netscape,..., but after a while I found
: something really unusual that the net speed is extremely slower than
: that under windows system. I can hardly surf the net by using netscape
: under RH, and when I download something from the net, the speed
: is extremely slower than under windows.
: I'm wondering if I did something wrong with the configuration or
: something not configured well with the modem, I've got a u.s. robotics
: external modem 56k, but the speed looks like only 56 :(
You can check the IRQ configured in Linux as compared to the IRQ the modem
actually uses. This will occur then and even connecting takes a long
time.
Look a the chat -v log. If you have expect/sends, say, '' ATZ followed
by OK '' or similar then the difference between the time ATZ is sent
and the time that the OK is found should be less than 2 seconds, usually
less than 1. In the case of a misconfigured IRQ it is on the order of
19 seconds.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Governments should be changed like diapers - often and for the
* same reason. */
------------------------------
From: Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Question: NAT/IP tunelling
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 20:22:49 GMT
Hi Netter,
Sometimes ago, I asked this newsgroup on the existence of NAT (Network
Address
Translation) for Linux and received information on IP tunelling, instead.
So,
I figured out that there exists no NAT software for Linux. I hope some of
you
can tell me that I am wrong.
Anyway, I do have a question on NAT (or IP tunelling) for Linux. Is it
legal
to use the IP tunelling to let your private net (192.x.x.x) surf or connect
to
the Internet?
--
Robert Young,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tmack)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Two PC's one modem ?
Date: 1 Jun 1999 15:22:15 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>How do you connect 2 PC's using one modem without swapping the
>connectors out of the PC's. Is there a cost effective way of doing
>this without buying a switch ?
>
>ie 2 nine pin connectors to one 9 pin connector would this work ?
>Or is there a networking solution to this ie connect from the NT
>box and not via Linux or the otherway around.
>
>Setup.. 1 x NT box, 1 x Linux box, 1 x 3com Message modem.
>
There are many ways to do it. One way would be to setup a nullmodem
(crossover serial cable) between the two, possibly run a parallel
link and use plip, another would be to put
a netcard in each and run either 10b2 or 10/100bT (crossover).
Simply use ipmasq or ipchains on the linux machine to masq/chain
between the modem and network. Might also want to run a proxy
for stubborn things that dont like masq'd firewalls. You could
use the NT machine as the modem's host, using a proxy. But why
would you do that when you have linux, and it can do so much more?
Tmack
--
blah
bleh
------------------------------
From: Mike Westerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Chains, IP Masq, and Dial on Demand Problems
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 14:55:25 -0400
I've set up my RH6.0 machine as a dial on demand router to the internet
for my home network.
The Dial on demand part seems to be working pretty well. My problems
lies (I believe) in that I do not understand IPChains at all (this is
after reading the man pages
and HOWTO's). Here are my issues.
1. Client workstations can't send mail . They can recv. it fine.
2. My browser keeps telling me that I've been disconnected from the
internet and would I like to work offline or connect. I hit connect and
everything's OK.
3. Some web pages aren't working properly through it. most noteably is
dejanews. It draws most of the page and then states that the connection
is lost when It tries to display the message.
When I do an ipchains -L this is what I get
chain input (policy ACCEPT):
chain forward (policy MASQ):
chain output (policy ACCEPT):
I'm using IPChains version 1.3.8 for firewall and IP Masq.
I'm using the RH 6.0 default kernel 2.2.5-15
I'm using pppd 2.3.7 for the dial on demand
Help!!!!
------------------------------
From: "Lee Vorthman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Appletalk
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 15:45:59 -0400
So once you have Appletalk set up under linux the drives will just show up
on your mac like a normal shared drive? How do you get the mac to recognize
the server? I assume you have to go into the chooser and the server should
show up there?
Thanks,
Lee
David Murray wrote in message
<01beac5f$6d3038e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>No problem.. Get the latest Netatalk package.. Under Redhat I can install
>it in 10 seconds and have my server sharing drives to my Macs.. I am sure
>there is a .DEB package you can install for Debian.. Otherwise you can get
>the .tar.gz version and deal with that..
>
>> I am running a linux server using Debian. I have a few mac's around and I
>am
>> interested in using appletalk to make my mac's talk to my linux server.
>Any
>> help and info on how to go about doing this would be greatly appreciated.
>I
>> would like to do it over ethernet if possible. Thanks.
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
