Linux-Networking Digest #373, Volume #11 Wed, 2 Jun 99 07:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: Question on VPN (Virtual Private Networking)i (William Sargent)
Re: FTP over IP-Masquerading ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: D-Link DFE500TX... (Mogens Kjaer)
Re: Running X Applications under Win95 (John Oliver)
Unable to print w/ Samba (Darrel Davis)
Re: You can earn $50,000 40686 (Jochem Huhmann)
Re: Telnet using "root" ("Robert Wein")
Help: 3com 3c509B etherlink III: Driver loads but ???? ("Vic")
Samba mounting (Heiko)
Re: another one with ppp problems (ryan estyrs)
Re: Help! is pci nic compatible with 486 board? (Gary Helbig)
Re: Linux as alternative to Ghost/DriveImage? dd? ("Christopher R. Thompson")
Re: autofs or am-utils, which one? (Remco WOuts)
Re: PPP to ISP fails ("Andy Greenshaw")
Re: PPP to ISP fails ("Andy Greenshaw")
Re: Multiple Domain Names - One Box ("bubba")
Newbie question - Modem share (Karl)
Re: YOUNG BEAUTIFUL MODEL AVAILABLE (Karl)
Re: fetchmail problems (Bob G)
Re: How can I tell if it is Linux? ("Gene Zesch")
Re: Dec VT220 Terminal Configuration (Steve Davidson)
Re: another one with ppp problems (Ryan Esty)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: William Sargent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Question on VPN (Virtual Private Networking)i
Date: 02 Jun 1999 02:10:37 GMT
John Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Superfly) writes:
: |> I am a cox@home User & I am trying to create a V.P.N with another
: |> @home user any tips would be GREATLY APPRECIATED
: Chances are. you don't need a really full vpn. Take a look at running ssh
: on either end. You can then transport X sessions and replace rlogin. Ftp
: and rcp are replaced by scp. Its really messy to transport other connections
: though.
However, if you ARE looking for a full VPN, try out FreeS/WAN, which uses IPSec
as the transmission protocol and is transparent to all applications.
I'm afraid I don't have a URL for frees/wan, but try looking on slashdot.org
or google -- it has a fair amount of press.
Will.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTP over IP-Masquerading
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 08:58:00 GMT
On Fri, 21 May 1999 21:25:28 +0200, "Jan Johansson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>modprobe ip_masq_ftp
>
I had exactly the same problem, and the above fixed it fine.
Darren.
------------------------------
From: Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: D-Link DFE500TX...
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 10:59:48 +0200
alpine wrote:
>
> this may help you out
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/test/via-rhine.c
No!
This is for the DFE-530TX. The poster asked for a driver
for DFE-500TX.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver)
Subject: Re: Running X Applications under Win95
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 02:28:16 GMT
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 05:19:28 +0100, "Hugh Saunders"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there any way to remotely run X applications under Windows? ie Can I get
>my linux server to do all the processing and work on my Windows machine? It
>must be possible 'cos I remember using X-Terminals which did the same sort
>of thing.
Get Mi/X from http://tnt.microimages.com/www/html/freestuf/mix/
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 22:31:13 -0400
From: Darrel Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unable to print w/ Samba
I'm having a real pain getting my printer to work
under Samba. I have the other shares working and
visible from Win98 but I can print fro Win98. It
appears as though it's printing from Win98 and if I
watch the files in /var/spool/samba, the request gets
there but the printer never gets active. I've included
the relevant parts of my smb.conf. Any help appreciated.
[global]
workgroup = DARREL
server string = Darrel's Redhat
printcat = /etc/printcap
netbios name = darrel1
logfile = /var/log/samba/log.%m
security = share
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
dns proxy = no
guest account = darreld
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
print ok = yes
printable = true
[lp]
comment = Epson on Darrel1
path = /var/spool/samba
printing = bsd
read only = no
guest ok = yes
print ok = yes
printer name = lp
oplocks = no
share modes = no
-darrel
============================================
Darrel Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux - The choice of a GNU generation
============================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jochem Huhmann)
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.javascript,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.eudora.ms-windows,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: You can earn $50,000 40686
Date: 1 Jun 1999 14:53:42 GMT
In article <7iuvt0$qb1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Kent Dahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gah! I hate it when they don't have a valid reply adress... So much FUN to
> send a reply, filling their e-mail-boxes as they do with ours.... Now, where
> is that virtual memory file and how do I attach it to outgoing e-mail? ;-))
mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/mem
(I don't recommend mail bombing, it does more harm to others than to
it's target)
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
------------------------------
From: "Robert Wein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: Telnet using "root"
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 02:31:41 GMT
for security - keep it that way. log in as any other account, and then "su
root" and log in again as root.
Fong's wrote in message <7j0le1$a451@rain>...
>Can "root" to telnet and login?
>I fail to login by root, but other account is ok..
>
>Thanks
>Fong's
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Vic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help: 3com 3c509B etherlink III: Driver loads but ????
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 16:27:43 +0800
I have a dual-boot computer with win3.11 and linux.
During bootup with slackware 3.3 (linux kernel 2.0.30), the driver correctly
finds the ISA NIC. But the machine is not reachable and cannot ping other
machines on the network, although it can ping it's own assigned IP address
but nothing else. The computer works well under win3.11.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.....
Alvin
------------------------------
From: Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba mounting
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 11:01:17 +0200
Hi! Can a simple User gain write-permission on mounted shares?
Heiko (Germany)
------------------------------
From: ryan estyrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: another one with ppp problems
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 03:03:10 +0000
The problem is that I had my card configured wrong and it dropped my
slow connection every thing works now
Ryan Esty wrote:
>
> I have been looking everywhere for help i have gone to how tos and mini
> how tos i looked up stuff on the web i asked my friends and now I am at
> a loss.
>
> When I am connected to the internet I get all my chat stuff done the ppp
> session begins and my computer starts to send out lcp configure packets
> these get returned and i get an error about serial line not 8 bit clean
> or something like that.
>
> In the how to it said that with this problem you might not be login in
> correctly but I used minicom to check that and the second problem is
> your connection might be really slow. So I do the stuff about the slow
> connection it says I usually connect at about 45000 but it takes about 2
> minutes for the ppp session to actually begin.
>
> What I have done so far about the slow connection is follow the ppp
> howto I have made another entry in my chat script that waits for the ~
> to happen before handing it over to pppd. I have also increased my max
> lcp configure to 60. Is there something else that I can do to get this
> done? I have sent an email to my isp with no responce as of yet. Sorry
> for the length of the explanation if you need logs just tell me but it
> is the 8 bit not clean that is the real concern.
>
> TIA
>
> Ryan Esty
------------------------------
From: Gary Helbig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! is pci nic compatible with 486 board?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 20:01:28 -0700
Rey,
Your motherboard is probably PCI-1.0. PCI 2.0 came out about the
time 90MHz pentiums did.
Your NIC card is probably PCI-2.1. It's probably real new.
There are known problems trying to use a bus mastering PCI-2 card in
a PCI-1 system. Basic problem is that it doesn't work reliably. This
kind of why they went to PCI-2.
Don't toss the motherboard if it's still useful; put the ISA NIC
back in, or get a 100MBit ISA NIC.
Gary.
Rey Kanzaki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Another newbie asking for help here. (hardware newbie to be exact).
> I'm using an old 486 box as a gateway and occassionally, the box
> hangs. The problem goes away after a reboot. I'm using the faster
> 100mb pci nic (from Realtek) after having replaced my reliable but
> slower 10mb isa nic. I've never had problems with the old isa nic,
> so I'm wondering if the problem is that 486 boards simply do not
> support new pci hardware. I was told that the new pci specification
> (2.1??) may not be compatible with old 486 boards.
>
> So I ask, is this a common problem? If there is a faq or how-to
> that can answer this question, please point me in that direction.
> My 486's have been good to me, and I'll only replace them if left
> with no other choice. Please save them... :) Thank you.
>
> --
> RK
------------------------------
From: "Christopher R. Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as alternative to Ghost/DriveImage? dd?
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 02:54:49 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I don't believe anyone has directly addressed this guy's question; I am also
> > interested in manipulating .img files of ext2 and vfat partitions using
> > Ghost. Does anyone know how this is done?
>
> > Joe
>
> > Sean O'Connor wrote in message ...
> > >Hello,
> > > Q: Can I use linux to create/copy(/install) a Win95/98/NTwks image over
> > >the network?
> > >
Yes dd will copy the entire image. Or sections of an image. If that's
what you want to do. But I think that implies that the 15 workstations
all have the same model disk drives doesn't it? What your getting with
dd is raw disc. No magic translations. If you go from a 2 head drive to
a four head drive things (could?) get wierd when they start looking for
files on cylinder boundaries and such.
------------------------------
Subject: Re: autofs or am-utils, which one?
From: Remco WOuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 02 Jun 1999 11:15:06 +0200
Last time I looked at linux autofs, it's config file format was
different from autofs on other UNIX operating systems. Not handy when
managing a network with multiple OS's. So we opted for amd, which can
nicely be administred through NIS. I think that amd is a bit more
powerful then autofs, in terms of configurability. I also like it's
ability to mount replicated disks (if a server gives up). All in all I
can say that our network became more stable after making all machines
use amd.
On the other hand if you have a network of linux machines, autofs
maybe the way to go.
Remco
------------------------------
From: "Andy Greenshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP to ISP fails
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:07:59 +0100
kernel ver 2.2.5-15 RedHat 6
pppd ver 2.3.7
jevon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7j189q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> what is your kernel ver and pppd ver?
>
> Andy Greenshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7j103s$5ms$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I am having problems connecting to my ISP from Linux. The dial-in is OK
> and
> > all initial negotiation is OK, but then my Linux box requests
termination
> of
> > the link with "No network protocols running".
> >
> > Below is the relevant contents of the /var/log/messages file.
> >
> > ----------------
> >
> > Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
> > Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: registered device ppp0
> > Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop pppd[661]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATE1QV1^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: ATE1QV1^M^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: OK
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> > Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATH0^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ATH0^M^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: OK
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: send (ATDT08450796699^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (CONNECT)
> > Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: ATDT08450796699^M^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: CONNECT
> > Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> > Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: expect (ogin:)
> > Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: 42666/ARQ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: User Access Verification^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login:
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (???????????????^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (assword:)
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login: ???????????^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: Password:
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (????????????^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (system.)
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Entering PPP mode.^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Async interface address is unnumbered
> > (FastEthernet0)^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Your IP address is 62.136.161.36. MTU
> is
> > 1500 bytes^M
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Header compression will match your
> > system.
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set dbg flags to 70000
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap
ffffffff
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Serial connection established.
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Using interface ppp0
> > Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap a0000
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap
ffffffff
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connection terminated.
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
> > Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
> > Jun 1 13:33:48 desktop pppd[661]: Exit.
> >
> > --------------------
> >
> > And here is what appears on screen:
> >
> > --------------------
> >
> >
> > Serial connection established.
> > Using interface ppp0
> > Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> > sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> > rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x42 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
> > <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c 54 49 4c 49
4e
> > 4b>]
> > sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x42 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55
> 4c
> > 54 49 4c 49 4e 4b>]
> > rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> > rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
> > <accomp>]
> > sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
> > <accomp>]
> > sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network protocols running"]
> > rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
> > Connection terminated.
> > Connect time 0.1 minutes.
> >
> > -------------------
> >
> > Any help much appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Andy Greenshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP to ISP fails
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:09:06 +0100
ppp0 protocol already added
marc* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7j1661$1a8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> may you should add the ppp0 protocol
> Under X type netcfg as root and then add ppp0 and fill in the gaps.
>
> marc.
>
> Andy Greenshaw a �crit dans le message
<7j103s$5ms$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I am having problems connecting to my ISP from Linux. The dial-in is OK
and
> >all initial negotiation is OK, but then my Linux box requests termination
> of
> >the link with "No network protocols running".
> >
> >Below is the relevant contents of the /var/log/messages file.
> >
> >----------------
> >
> >Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
> >Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: registered device ppp0
> >Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop pppd[661]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATE1QV1^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: ATE1QV1^M^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: OK
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> >Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATH0^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ATH0^M^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: OK
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: send (ATDT08450796699^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (CONNECT)
> >Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: ATDT08450796699^M^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: CONNECT
> >Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> >Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: expect (ogin:)
> >Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: 42666/ARQ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: User Access Verification^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login:
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (???????????????^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (assword:)
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login: ???????????^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: Password:
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (????????????^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (system.)
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: ^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Entering PPP mode.^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Async interface address is unnumbered
> >(FastEthernet0)^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Your IP address is 62.136.161.36. MTU
is
> >1500 bytes^M
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Header compression will match your
> >system.
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set dbg flags to 70000
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Serial connection established.
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Using interface ppp0
> >Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap a0000
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connection terminated.
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
> >Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
> >Jun 1 13:33:48 desktop pppd[661]: Exit.
> >
> >--------------------
> >
> >And here is what appears on screen:
> >
> >--------------------
> >
> >
> >Serial connection established.
> >Using interface ppp0
> >Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> >sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> >rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x42 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
> ><accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c 54 49 4c 49 4e
> >4b>]
> >sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x42 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55
4c
> >54 49 4c 49 4e 4b>]
> >rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> >rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
> ><accomp>]
> >sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
> ><accomp>]
> >sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network protocols running"]
> >rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
> >Connection terminated.
> >Connect time 0.1 minutes.
> >
> >-------------------
> >
> >Any help much appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: "bubba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multiple Domain Names - One Box
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 02:31:53 -0700
You betcha it's possible! Check out the O'Reilly & Associates book "DNS and
Bind", and check out www.isc.org for more specific info on Bind. What you'd
do (generally) is install bind 8 and setup the named.conf for multiple
domains, and create separate zone files (1 for each domain you wish to host,
or each resource you want to serve).
IP masquerading would not be the way to go....unless you wanted to have more
than one machine sharing your bandwidth.
Blake!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not a guru, but I play one on TV! =)
Flare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is my second question for this newsgroup, hopefully it'll be as
> easy as the first one.
>
> I have a Linux box (v2.0.36 - Slackware v3.6) it has one Internet IP
> address (lets say 216.26.16.1 for an example). Is it possible to use
> two domain names on the same IP and have my Linux box service requests
> to them both (WWW, NNTP, FTP, EMail, etc). For example, lets say my two
> domain names are mydomain.teleport.com and mydomain.teleport2.com.
> Requests to the second domain name should be handled exactly the same as
> requests to the first domain name (obviously except for the domain
> name). How could I go about doing this? Thanks in advance for any
> help!
>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 20:29:00 +1000
From: Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie question - Modem share
Hi,
Ive been working with M$ products for 11 yrs so I can accept techie
answers, but kinda new at linux.
My Q is this.. Is there a util that will work similar to a proxy server
under NT?
I wish to share an internet connection (DU. Floating IP) across a
network with all ports available without *too* much setting up. I
currently run 1 linux box (play machine) 1 W98 and 1 W95 box.
Im currently using Ishare for win with disappointing results and think
Linux can do much better.
Phoenix
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 20:32:04 +1000
From: Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: YOUNG BEAUTIFUL MODEL AVAILABLE
Show up naked, bring pizza and beer.. Your node or mine?
Phoenix
Rob Farrell wrote:
> Anisha wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi!
> > My name is Anisha.
> > I am 24 yrs old beautiful model from Paris,
> > I would like to accompany you (discerning gentlemen) for dining,
> > entertainment and pleasure in Europe.
> > I've long black hair and dark eyes,a slim good figure with beautiful
> > face
> > I am well educated, sociable, polite and fun to be with.
> >
> > If you'd like to arrange a liaison, you can contact me at :
>
> *snip*
>
> w00w00!!! Sounds like she throws one helluva install party!!!!
>
> --
>
> __ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> / / (_)__ __ ____ __
> / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / (2.2.1)
> /____/_/_//_/\_ _/ /_/\_\
> The choice of the GNU generation!
>
> oOOo GBH Network Operations oOOo
------------------------------
From: Bob G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 05:53:21 GMT
Meling Mudin wrote:
>
> Anyone get fetchmail working? When I run fetmail, I got the
> following error:
> skipping poll of excite.com, eth0/10.1.2.8 IP address excluded
>
> My machine(10.1.2.9) is connected via another Linux box (10.1.2.8)
> which acts as a gateway. Another problem is that fetchmail should
> poll mail.excite.com, not excite.com. How do I configure this?
The contents of your .fetchmailrc would be most helpful here (edited of
course). Does it work from the gateway machine (10.1.2.8)?
- Bob
------------------------------
From: "Gene Zesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I tell if it is Linux?
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 21:15:04 -0500
You can also try this site.
http://www.netcraft.com/cgi-bin/Survey/whats
Gene
------------------------------
From: Steve Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dec VT220 Terminal Configuration
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 20:34:53 -0400
"Stuart R. Fuller" wrote:
> Steve Davidson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : I have an old Dec VT220 terminal that I would like to use for access to
> : my RH box. Where can I find information regarding setting this up?
>
> /usr/doc/HOWTO/unmaintained/Serial-HOWTO
>
> You'll need a null modem cable (female connectors on both ends with at least
> pins 2 and 3 reversed).
>
> Stu
Thanks, that's the ticket! I knew it was out there somewhere...
Steve
------------------------------
From: Ryan Esty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: another one with ppp problems
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 23:34:30 -0400
I was able to solve this problem so I am all set thanks to everyone that
helped.
ryan estyrs wrote:
> The problem is that I had my card configured wrong and it dropped my
> slow connection every thing works now
> Ryan Esty wrote:
> >
> > I have been looking everywhere for help i have gone to how tos and mini
> > how tos i looked up stuff on the web i asked my friends and now I am at
> > a loss.
> >
> > When I am connected to the internet I get all my chat stuff done the ppp
> > session begins and my computer starts to send out lcp configure packets
> > these get returned and i get an error about serial line not 8 bit clean
> > or something like that.
> >
> > In the how to it said that with this problem you might not be login in
> > correctly but I used minicom to check that and the second problem is
> > your connection might be really slow. So I do the stuff about the slow
> > connection it says I usually connect at about 45000 but it takes about 2
> > minutes for the ppp session to actually begin.
> >
> > What I have done so far about the slow connection is follow the ppp
> > howto I have made another entry in my chat script that waits for the ~
> > to happen before handing it over to pppd. I have also increased my max
> > lcp configure to 60. Is there something else that I can do to get this
> > done? I have sent an email to my isp with no responce as of yet. Sorry
> > for the length of the explanation if you need logs just tell me but it
> > is the 8 bit not clean that is the real concern.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Ryan Esty
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
