Linux-Networking Digest #398, Volume #11 Fri, 4 Jun 99 01:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: Port numbers ("George Georgakis")
ssh 2.0.13 problem...help (Patrick Hsieh)
Newsgroup retreival slow w/kppd,Netscape (Kari Suomela)
Re: Building kernel failed! ("George Georgakis")
Re: Im searching for a script for passwd/smbpasswd (Nicholas E Couchman)
Re: Setting up an ISP. ("Ian")
Re: Help with Samba and Win Box ("Aaron Fransen")
Re: Making an ICQ server (Rage-DCA)
Re: HOW TO change reported IP ??? ("Aaron Fransen")
Re: YOUNG BEAUTIFUL MODEL AVAILABLE (Glitch)
Truncated-IP? Are these really bad packets? ("Chris Eng")
Re: Making an ICQ server (Paul Anderson)
Re: Trouble with tftp (Uwe Ohse)
IP in IP tunneling tool? ("Wei-chun Chao")
Slow Apache on intranet ("Mads Skov Hansen")
Re: Compiling kernel failed ("Aaron Fransen")
Re: DDNS Server for Linux ("Andrew Tatton")
loopback device problems (Newell Ramsey)
Re: PPP is slow under linux (Bill Unruh)
Installing IpChains in RH 6.0 (Dzerdecki)
Configuring my Netgear Printer Server ("Trevor Porter")
Re: PCAnywhere ("Guo Quin")
dsl and linux R.H-5.2 (PeAcE^)
pump, dhcpcd, and redhat 6.0 (Matthew Levine)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <linuxstart.com@geegee>
Subject: Re: Port numbers
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:58:08 GMT
/etc/services lists the ones used by your linux box. However there are many
more, some more official than others.
I do have a list, but in the interests of people's bandwidth I won't post
it. I suggest you do a search on Altavista.
George
===========================================================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
If necessary, however, I can be contacted thru linuxstart.com@geegee.
(Swap "geegee" and "linuxstart.com").
===========================================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article <7j3u6u$qmn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Lagace) wrote:
>
> > Does a list of port numbers exist anywhere?
>
> /etc/services
>
> --
> -Bill Clark
> Systems Architect
> ISP Channel
> http://locale.ispchannel.com/
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick Hsieh)
Subject: ssh 2.0.13 problem...help
Date: 03 Jun 1999 15:00:52 GMT
I have 2 Linux Red Hat 6.0 boxes which were both installed ssh 2.0.13
and runs well.
Yesterday I reinstall Red Hat on on of them and reinstall ssh 2.0.13 in
it. Now when I try to use ssh2 to connect from one to the other, there
will be a error message:
Disconnected; authentication error (No further authentication methods
available.
).
Please tell me how to solve this problem and write back to my email
address.
Thank you.
Patrick Hsieh
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Webmaster of NCCU English Department http://english.nccu.edu.tw
Say Hello to Pahud http://pahud.dorm9.nccu.edu.tw
TEL 0933201800
--
[1;33;41m�� Origin: �F�j�̯�����BBS�� 140.119.185.146 �� From: 140.119.199.199
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kari Suomela)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kari Suomela)
Subject: Newsgroup retreival slow w/kppd,Netscape
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 03:05:24 GMT
Friday June 04 1999 02:35, John Zbesko wrote to All:
JZ> Why does Netscape and kppd have such a slow time downloading
JZ> newsgroups? The connection is reported at 38.8, and the status
JZ> window
That is not your connect speed, only the port speed. Change your modem
settings to return the connect speed!
KS
... Better 12 jurymen than 6 pallbearers.
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <linuxstart.com@geegee>
Subject: Re: Building kernel failed!
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 16:07:14 GMT
Just from reading that first line, try recompiling the kernel again, this
time with SCSI support.
George
===========================================================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
If necessary, however, I can be contacted thru linuxstart.com@geegee.
(Swap "geegee" and "linuxstart.com").
===========================================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article <7j518t$66a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
> It failed on:
>
> "ide.h:69: #error "SCSI must also be selected"
> make[3]:***[ide.o] Error 1
> make[3]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/drivers/block'
> make[2]:***[first_rule] Error 2
> make[2]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/drivers/block'
> make[1]:***[sub_dirs] Error 2
> make[1]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/drivers'
> make:***[linuxsubdirs] Error 2"
>
>
> Any help???
> Thanks in advance for your help. Ken R.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Re: Im searching for a script for passwd/smbpasswd
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 03:47:58 GMT
As long as you are set to use Unix passwords in your /etc/smb.conf file,
you shouldn't have to fool w/ smbpasswd.
--Nick
Cyriac REMY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is someone know how could I create a new user in passwd file and
> smbpasswd at the same time... I dont want to have a prompt to tape
> 4 times the password...
>
> actually :
> > adduser toto
> > passwd toto
> New UNIX password: test
> Retype new UNIX password: test
> passwd: all authentication tokens updated successfully
>
> > smbadduser toto:toto
> Adding: toto to /etc/smbpasswd
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ENTER password for toto
> New SMB password:test
> Retype new SMB password:test
> Password changed for user toto.
>
> Okay but it's too long. Do you know how to create a script or do
> you have a code to do smthing like :
>
> > newadduser toto test
> toto has been created sucessfullly...
> >
>
> At last, do you have smthing to let user change their password under
> Linux for Linux and Samba at the same time ?
>
> > chgpasswd
> old : ######
> new : #########
> new again : #########
> >
>
> Thanks !!!
>
> Cyriac REMY
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up an ISP.
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 14:31:32 +1200
The ISP HowTo?
Ian
Chuck Snively wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi All,
>
>Can someone tell me where I can obtain info about setting up an ISP?
>
>Hardware, software, etc.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Chuck
>
------------------------------
From: "Aaron Fransen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with Samba and Win Box
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 03:59:35 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
=======_NextPart_000_0036_01BEAE0C.5D977480
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It doesn't sound like a Win or Samba problem, but a problem with the =
Ethernet card in your Linux box, or, and I know this sounds silly, a =
problem with your Ethernet hub. Are they all running 10Mb? 100Mb?
Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message =
news:7j6mqo$bdj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am trying to set up a simple network using RH 5.2 as a Server for =
Two Windows Computers. One is Win98 and the other is Win95. I can not =
seam to get the right configuration. The WIN boxes can easily see =
themselves and the server can ping itself. Whenever I try to ping the =
Server from one of the Win boxes nothing happens. The Server will not =
accept any Telnet sessions, FTP sessions or even a HTTP session. Why am =
I hitting my head against the wall over this?=20
My questions:
What protocols should be used by the Winboxes=20
What client should it be set up for.
And why cant these two different operating systems see each other!
I have slowly be moving my way through the man pages about this trying =
different things. But even without the SMB server shouldn't the two =
computers be able to communicate using just the TCP protocol for access =
to FTP, Telnet, and HTTP?=20
please help me! (Obviously I am using a class C network)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]=20
=======_NextPart_000_0036_01BEAE0C.5D977480
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#d8d0c8>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>It doesn't sound like a Win or Samba problem, but a =
problem=20
with the Ethernet card in your Linux box, or, and I know this sounds =
silly, a=20
problem with your Ethernet hub. Are they all running 10Mb? =
100Mb?</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>Thomas <<A =
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:7j6mqo$bdj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:7j6mqo$bdj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>...=
</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I am trying to set up a simple =
network using=20
RH 5.2 as a Server for Two Windows Computers. One is Win98 and the =
other is=20
Win95. I can not seam to get the right configuration. The WIN boxes =
can easily=20
see themselves and the server can ping itself. Whenever I try to ping =
the=20
Server from one of the Win boxes nothing happens. The Server will not =
accept=20
any Telnet sessions, FTP sessions or even a HTTP session. Why am I =
hitting my=20
head against the wall over this? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>My questions:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>What protocols should be used by =
the Winboxes=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>What client should it be set up=20
for.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>And why cant these two different =
operating=20
systems see each other!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I have slowly be moving my way =
through the man=20
pages about this trying different things. But even without the SMB =
server=20
shouldn't the two computers be able to communicate using just the TCP =
protocol=20
for access to FTP, Telnet, and HTTP? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>please help me! (Obviously I am =
using a class=20
C network)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>=20
</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
=======_NextPart_000_0036_01BEAE0C.5D977480==
------------------------------
From: Rage-DCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Making an ICQ server
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 02:56:54 GMT
Azfar Kazmi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any ICQ daemon available? I looked at freshmeat.net but found
> none stable. How can I make an ICQ box?
>
> I have provided a cache server to users and they connect to Internet
> through that. Since they wish to use ICQ and Squid doesn't allow that
> therefore I thought why I don't make my own box an ICQ server. Is that
> possible? I have never used ICQ though. I even don't know how the client
> works.
>
> I am using Redhat 4.1 kernel 2.0.34
>
> --
> Azfar Kazmi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
in my opinion the best way to get icq working without an icq daemon is to
run a firewall which also works great with masquerading. the best way is to
install masquerading which is quite easy to do and then run my firewall
script which can be obtained at http://rage.chroot.net/firewall. just
download it and chmod it 755. that way you can excute it. it supports both
eth0 and ppp0 so basically it takes any packets which doesn't resolve and
foward them to ppp0 (the internet). works quite well with icq. you can also
download an icq module (check linuxapps.com). good luck and feel free to
mail me for addition help.
--
Jason Osborne (Rage-DCA)
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://rage.dynip.com
- LinuxInside - I run it, do you?
------------------------------
From: "Aaron Fransen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HOW TO change reported IP ???
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 04:13:30 GMT
It sounds like you need to run masquerading and port forwarding.
If you're running kernel 2.0x (ie. RedHat 5.x, OpenLinux 1.x) you have to
download and install both the IP masquerading and port forwarding software,
but kernel 2.2 (RH 6.0, OL 2.2) has the masquerading built-in in the form of
IPCHAINS. You still have to download the port forwarding tho (IPMASQADM).
Best way is to check out the mini-HOWTO for IP Masquerading: www.linux.org,
Support, Mini-HOWTO's.
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:x7x53.37$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a machine that is behind a remaping firewall, which screws up the
> ip's so when I go on the net my ip is not what it is suppose to be and
when
> I try to run the q3 server no one can connect to me !!
>
> Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7j60fu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Why would you want to?
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:21:08 -0400
From: Glitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: YOUNG BEAUTIFUL MODEL AVAILABLE
parisian model named Anisha? something fishy about that.....
Karl wrote:
>
> Show up naked, bring pizza and beer.. Your node or mine?
>
> Phoenix
>
> Rob Farrell wrote:
>
> > Anisha wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > > My name is Anisha.
> > > I am 24 yrs old beautiful model from Paris,
> > > I would like to accompany you (discerning gentlemen) for dining,
> > > entertainment and pleasure in Europe.
> > > I've long black hair and dark eyes,a slim good figure with beautiful
> > > face
> > > I am well educated, sociable, polite and fun to be with.
> > >
> > > If you'd like to arrange a liaison, you can contact me at :
> >
> > *snip*
> >
> > w00w00!!! Sounds like she throws one helluva install party!!!!
> >
> > --
> >
> > __ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > / / (_)__ __ ____ __
> > / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / (2.2.1)
> > /____/_/_//_/\_ _/ /_/\_\
> > The choice of the GNU generation!
> >
> > oOOo GBH Network Operations oOOo
------------------------------
From: "Chris Eng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Truncated-IP? Are these really bad packets?
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 00:19:50 -0400
i read a few messages a couple weeks ago about this truncated-ip
problem that people have been noticing. i just switched ISP's,
and all of the sudden i am having the truncated-ip problems too!
somebody had posted that this was caused by a problem in libpcap
or something like that... what i don't understand is, why is it
that i never got these errors with my old ISP? my connection
doesn't SEEM to be noticeably slower, but i'm not positive.
with my old ISP i *never* got these errors, with my new one i
get them a LOT. (before anyone suggests it, i can't switch back
to my old ISP because i needed one that offered static IP).
does anybody know 1) if these really are bad packets (or just a
problem with the way tcpdump interprets them), and 2) how can i
fix it?
thanks,
chris
---
cr:/sbin> tcpdump -i ppp0
tcpdump: listening on ppp0
23:11:21.318200 209.122.238.19.64269 > 209.173.158.78.http: . ack 1460 win
8760
(DF) [tos 0x10]
23:11:21.387945 truncated-ip - 430 bytes missing!209.173.158.78.http >
209.122.2
38.19.64269: . 1460:2920(1460) ack 1 win 8426 (DF)
23:11:21.518302 209.122.238.19.64269 > 209.173.158.78.http: . ack 2920 win
8760
(DF) [tos 0x10]
23:11:21.657950 truncated-ip - 430 bytes missing!209.173.158.78.http >
209.122.2
38.19.64269: P 2920:4380(1460) ack 1 win 8426 (DF)
23:11:21.671785 209.122.238.19.64269 > 209.173.158.78.http: . ack 4380 win
8760
7
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Anderson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Making an ICQ server
Date: 3 Jun 1999 17:38:11 -0400
Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Is there any ICQ daemon available? I looked at freshmeat.net but found
>none stable. How can I make an ICQ box?
>
Don't use ICQ, it's got some incredible security holes. Use IRC, it's been
around for ages, works well, clients are available for many more platforms
than ICQ, and there are many servers to choose from. TTYL!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uwe Ohse)
Subject: Re: Trouble with tftp
Date: 3 Jun 1999 10:44:14 +0200
Hello Dirk von Suchodoletz,
> we use a set of about 100 linux X terminals booting via bootp and tftp.
>The tftp server starts via (x)inetd. Sometimes we get into trouble,
>because tftp is unwilling to transfer the boot kernel. The connection
>times out and the terminals hang...
Does that happening while or after a lot of them try to boot?
If that's the case you are possibly running into a load limitation
built into inetd (look for "max" in the inetd manual page).
One problem with unix tftpd is that it defaults to only log problems. You
won't see a hint in the log files for the kind of problem mentioned above.
>If we try to start the daemon in the command line it says in
>/var/log/messages: recvfrom: Socket operation on non-socket
That's normal. The usual unix tftp daemons can only be started from
inetd, and except an udp socket on file descriptor 0.
>The daemon we use is the standard of suse distribution, but we compiled
>it from the netpackage and it was the same...
Well, if you can't get it to work right you might try
ftp://ftp.nrw.net/pub/uwe/releases/utftpd-0.2.1.tar.gz
at least it logs more ...
Regards, Uwe
------------------------------
From: "Wei-chun Chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP in IP tunneling tool?
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:30:04 -0700
Hi,
I'm working on overlay network, which needs to setup a virtual network over
a physical network.
To setup a tunnel, we can use "ifconfig tunlx" & "route add --- tunlx" or
"iproute2" package.
Does anyone know any other tool?
Thanks for your help.
------------------------------
From: "Mads Skov Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slow Apache on intranet
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 18:29:51 +0200
Reply-To: "Mads Skov Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi
I'm running Apache on RedHat 5.2 and have set up a homepage. When accessing
the page first time - after a period without browsing - it takes about 5
seconds before the page shows.
Before RedHat, a NT server was delivering the pages at once - always.
If I refresh (also ctrl-F5) the page is shown at once, but not the first
time.
How can this be?
The Linux box is running with "Caching nameserver" - could this be causing
delays due to funny lookups?
Thanx for your help
/Mads Skov Hansen
------------------------------
From: "Aaron Fransen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compiling kernel failed
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 04:05:31 GMT
Perhaps a little more information?
I personally use make xconfig just because I'm a gui kind of guy. If you do,
go into the SCSI section and turn SCSI support on and retry the compile.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7j6al8$jh3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> It failed on:
>
> "ide.h:69: #error "SCSI must also be selected"
> make[3]:***[ide.o] Error 1
> make[3]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/drivers/block'
> make[2]:***[first_rule] Error 2
> make[2]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/drivers/block'
> make[1]:***[sub_dirs] Error 2
> make[1]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/drivers'
> make:***[linuxsubdirs] Error 2"
>
>
> Any help???
> Thanks in advance for your help. Ken R.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Andrew Tatton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DDNS Server for Linux
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:27:55 +0100
Reply-To: "Andrew Tatton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.dhis.org
I use and love it, it gives you username.dhis.org and also sets up email
spooling for you, so if you've got sendmail configured correctly you can
have: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Tatton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ken Hughes wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Does anyone know of any dynamic DNS servers for Linux? I've been
>searching for a while but with no luck.
>
>Ken Hughes
>
------------------------------
From: Newell Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: loopback device problems
Date: 3 Jun 1999 16:31:13 GMT
I'm kind of new to Linux, so please forgive me if this is a bad question.
I recently installed an ethernet card 3Com 3c595-tx, and loaded the
module3c59x.o. The card seems to work okay, as I am able to telnet to the
machine from my mac.
However, the loopback device no longer works. If I try to bring it up,
this is what happens:
[root@localhost /root]# ifup lo
ipcalc: ip address expected
ipcalc: ip address expected
ipcalc: ip address expected
netmask: unknown interface.
netmask: Unknown host
lo: Unknown host
usage: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes <net-device>
usage: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-aliases <net-device>
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post: [: too many arguments
Any ideas?
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Subject: Re: PPP is slow under linux
Date: 4 Jun 1999 04:25:08 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi, i am quite a new user to linux. I got some question:
>1. How do can i check the real modem speed when i connect to my ISP.
There are two speeds-- the modem to computer speed ( which should be at
least 57600 and prefereably 115200). (pppd defaults to 9600 so make sure
you use a valid speed on the pppd command line) The other is the modem
to modem speed. Your modem reports one or the otehr of these on
connection
(CONNECT 57600)
you have to issue the correct AT command to get the various reports.
Run chat with the -v option, and then look in
/var/log/messages for the speed.
On my Voicesurf 336 the command is \V3 for comp to modem speed, and \V0
for modem to modem (in chat you may have to put in AT\\\\V0, because of
the special meaning of \ to both the shell and chat.
)
Then look in /var/log/messages.
>2. Why is PPP connection so sluggish in Linux ??
>I have Cyrix MII 300 Mhz running and a Motorola Voicesurfr external
>modem, i copied the initialization string from windows98 control panel,
>and it didn't help at all, and i've already tried setting the MTU and
>MRU to 576, it didn't help either.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dzerdecki)
Subject: Installing IpChains in RH 6.0
Date: 3 Jun 1999 16:35:53 GMT
I am having trouble even finding the ipchains command. I dont know if I need
to complile a new kernel for RH 6.0 before I can use the make config command.
How would I do this?
Thanks.
Drew
------------------------------
From: "Trevor Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Configuring my Netgear Printer Server
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 13:42:36 -0230
Hi,
I have a Netgear P110 printer server attached to my network and am running
two printers off its logical ports, L1 and L2. It has an IP address and I
can ping it from my RH6.0 box. DOes anyone know how I can use linux to
administer the queue and then share it with the rest of my (mostly NT)
network?
Thanks,
Trevor
------------------------------
From: "Guo Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PCAnywhere
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 04:14:51 GMT
Hello.
I download VNC today, It's great.
WIn95 and Win98 can see each other.
My linux box(Redhat 5.0) can see windows too, but I have not yet made it the
other way. I run vncserver in Xwindows then vncviewer in Window98, no matter
how I try, Win98 fail to connect to Linux.
I don't know if I must run Xvnc to start Xwindow ? Xvnc doesn't work,
I run "startx" as usual.
Any tips ?
Kieu
Brian Rectanus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Use VNC instead. It is similar to PCAnywhere, but cross-platform
> capable and free.
>
> http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
>
> -Brian
>
>
> Indra Nusantara wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am really new to this Linux world. I have just succesfully setup a
RedHat
> > 5.2 box.
> >
> > I have several NT servers that I usually administer from my Win98 PC
through
> > PCAnywhere.
> >
> > Is there a way to do that in Linux ? I mean, can I remotely connect to
my NT
> > PCAnywhere hosts from the LInux machine ?
> >
> > I really appreciate any sugestions. Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Indra Nusantara
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: PeAcE^ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dsl and linux R.H-5.2
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 12:34:26 -0400
==============5CD2AD5944459F72611C8663
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello group
Having trouble setting up my dsl with linux.
my network allocation is 198.168.1.0/24
netmask 255.255.255.240
192.168.1.2 this will be the address for the linux box
192.168.1.3 this will be the address for the win95
gateway is 192.168.1.1
nameservers 198.7.0.1/198.7.0.1
Im using a netopia 12 user router problem is, is that windows work and linux
don't. This is my routing table for linux.
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.240 up
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.240 eth0
route add default gw 192.168.1.1 eth0
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
Plz is the anyone who can help me get my network up.
Thanks in advance. ;)
--
=====PeAcE GEEK CODE BLOCK=====
Version: 3.1
GO dpus: a C++ UL++++ P L+++ E---- W+ N+ o-- K w M- PS PE-- Y
PGP- t 5 X+ R* tv+ b-- DI- D+ G e h---- r+++ z++**
=====END OF GEEK CODE BLOCK====
==============5CD2AD5944459F72611C8663
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" LINK="#0000EF" VLINK="#51188E" ALINK="#FF0000">
Hello group
<PRE>Having trouble setting up my dsl with linux.</PRE>
<PRE>my network allocation is 198.168.1.0/24</PRE>
<PRE>netmask 255.255.255.240</PRE>
<PRE>192.168.1.2 this will be the address for the linux box</PRE>
<PRE>192.168.1.3 this will be the address for the win95</PRE>
<PRE>gateway is 192.168.1.1</PRE>
<PRE>nameservers 198.7.0.1/198.7.0.1</PRE>
<PRE>Im using a netopia 12 user router problem is, is that windows work and linux</PRE>
<PRE>don't. This is my routing table for linux.</PRE>
<PRE>ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.240 up</PRE>
<PRE>route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.240 eth0</PRE>
<PRE>route add default gw 192.168.1.1 eth0</PRE>
<PRE>Kernel IP routing table
Destination
Gateway
Genmask Flags Metric
Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0
0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240
U 0
0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0
0.0.0.0
255.0.0.0 U
0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0
192.168.1.1
0.0.0.0 UG
0 0 0
eth0</PRE>
<PRE>Plz is the anyone who can help me get my network up.</PRE>
<PRE>Thanks in advance. ;)</PRE>
<PRE>--
=====PeAcE GEEK CODE BLOCK=====
Version: 3.1
GO dpus: a C++ UL++++ P L+++ E---- W+ N+ o-- K w M- PS PE-- Y
PGP- t 5 X+ R* tv+ b-- DI- D+ G e h---- r+++ z++**
=====END OF GEEK CODE BLOCK====</PRE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
==============5CD2AD5944459F72611C8663==
------------------------------
From: Matthew Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pump, dhcpcd, and redhat 6.0
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 17:49:11 -0700
Why was dhcpcd replaced by pump in redhat 6.0? As far as I can tell,
pump is deficient. It doesn't set a default route using the gateway
option and it doesn't configure the nameserver either.
I'm trying to go back to dhcpcd but I keep getting timeouts. Is there
any particular reason why dhcpcd would fail with the 2.2 kernel or could
it be that it is entirely unrelated to the kernel version?
What I want to do shouldn't be that hard. I'd like a dhcp client which
can correctly configure my nameserver and default route without any user
intervention. I can continue to use pump if someone has figured out how
to do this with pump or I'd be much happier if I could use dhcpcd which
seems to be more widely documented and more robust.
Email responses are preferred.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
---
======
Matthew Levine
Quality Assurance (SW Initiatives - Broadband)
Cisco Systems, Santa Cruz http://www.cisco.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
