Linux-Networking Digest #404, Volume #11 Fri, 4 Jun 99 12:13:37 EDT
Contents:
Re: ICMP error ("Jan Johansson")
Re: Setting up an ISDN TA ("Jan Johansson")
Re: X-Win32, Crack Code ?? ("A. Vohra")
Re: Ping the network ("Mike Somerville")
Re: NFS Lock Deamon for Linux. Is there one? (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Re: linux ADSL setup - name resolution problem (Dave Perdue)
Re: IP to IPX firewall & gateway ("SEAPEA")
2.2.5-15 kernel eats memory! (Joe Robertson)
Re: Help Me Identify an Ethernet Card (James Youngman)
Re: IPCHAINS / Netmeeting (Charles Yates)
I having a trouble ("Lim")
No Buffer space available error when trying to ping. (Kishore Sarathy)
Re: Intel Pro/100+ and RH 6.0? (Eric Yousey)
Re: Multiple Domain Names - One Box (Flare)
Re: Redhat 6.0 & ipmasqerade problems (Cam Penner)
Re: Getting EVERYTHING to work through a firewall. (Paul Schultz)
Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (Clifford Kite)
Re: Help with Samba and Win Box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Cannot assign address when trying to bind ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linksys Etherfast 10/100 probs (Ted Potter)
Re: I having a trouble ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Before I screw up the internet.... (Christopher R. Barry)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ICMP error
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:43:31 +0200
> With my kernel (2.2.5) on my redhat linux box,
>I got always an 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx sent an invalid
>ICMP error to a broadcast'.
>To fix it I saw that a file in /proc get a value that I
>would change. This value is surely fixed with some
>configuration tool. I tried linuxconf, I tried to change
>the options in the kernel but nothing work.
>Can someone tell me how can I fix the problem ?
echo VALUE > /proc/whatever/file
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up an ISDN TA
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:42:45 +0200
>I have a plain version of Redhat 5.2 i386 kernel 2.0.36 and I want to
>set it up to connect to my ISP via an 3com Sonix ISDN TA attached via
>the serial port, can anyone point me in the right direction on where to
>find the information to do this or email me a guide.
If it is hayes compatible and connected to the serial port, you treat it as
any regular analog modem
------------------------------
From: "A. Vohra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: X-Win32, Crack Code ??
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 13:06:19 +0100
Cracking X win32 would be illegal.
I will suggest you try Mi/X X server see
http://www.microimages.com/freestuf/mix/
It will work from PC & Mac
And VNC as well
A.Vohra
"Adam C. Emerson" wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.networking Fong's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do the How to Crack the X-Win32 V.4.12
> > http://www.starnet.com/product.htm
>
> > That can Runing the X-Window on the Win95 & NT platform..
> > Is great , but no code can only work for one hour & cannot Login many
> > machine at same time....
>
> > Hackers!! Help!!
>
> What, prithee has this to do with Linux?
>
> Besides, hackers don't go around cracking things except under unusual
> circumstances. Programming is much more interesting than breaking
> copy-protection (however stupid copy-protection may be). Why
> don't you go over to alt.2600, where you can get all the phreaks,
> crackers, and three-leet warez-doods you want.
>
> --
> Remove absolutelynospamorI'llkillyou from the following triple
> symmetric-cipher encoded (apple, commodore, trs-80), rot13'd,
> diagnoal email address to email me.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
> Version: GnuPG v0.9.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> jAwEBAEDIWMVbxVRwhLJwQ10a1Q7ygHnIpoB5YMo7vweRY/nc4qYRbIHTaO8lnbV
> uoWiebrFTuOBhZgtObE6luy8tLBDo6wvKo1rL8ZlTcXWvSb5vWUzVF8RqHSt8bMw
> 7od0GEs1yCF/kdjxDx8hmI29v+lEYQ9m9rAUo5wuXGS8vkY2XphDdU2f1AV7yOiV
> p9N2BwrZYNEa8aLEApIaVTpmoXW3nWV+TI73T1VnRTHl/AhOYK1kpzPLBPi9DlW1
> v/XCn5SYIWZLZPsKbzXps70VkAYg+ytUQcbT3bJGvuLu6gNDNe/po+2+aqkk+rhZ
> HaWvOF2IEKrHSIszZiFJ3Bo2Ing4v+0OB4An/8/DpmoiHo/70W9fpkfE5kqiLGnS
> iuMaZ7JvGL2XIdNmNcBmPxlK4VgCyJtoYY0x6fhBlVoA+uQKZxjtgIaDq9NhNnTu
> oAwJrLyeGCL5eBDf4EYBvReivNcNnv9GqffoOwvZBWQjnHWb/p2NAyuF9frnLEXu
> 5n9B+xgfOAgJ7pz5X8i0Ok9+Eh/SQQ0exu9HJ760aa9ncEuzYFd6rbg55CTC4Uj2
> /neumF0KRX3P1KQQ89/SU/x3X59rwAJsvNNUjQt1ereu9uLv1D5BYQ+gHSPvPA==
> =OUeJ
> -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
------------------------------
From: "Mike Somerville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ping the network
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 03:18:00 -0400
without knowing the history it could be a flaky patch cable or a bad port on
your hub. I have seen it before so dont just dismiss it, look at your
cableing, for the price of a new patch it's worth it just to know for sure
that your wire is good.
Francisco Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok now I manage to do ping to other ip's on my network but is awfully slow
> and iam getting packet loss, what could this be?
>
> Francisco
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: NFS Lock Deamon for Linux. Is there one?
Date: 4 Jun 1999 14:05:35 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dann Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>RH6.0 includes a lockd daemon. If you want to get this without installing RH
>6.0, you could a new kernel (use 2.2.5 or better) and make sure that you answer
>"yes" to "emulate Sun NFS server."
"emulate Sun NFS server" doesn't have anything to do with locking.
I wish they had given this option another name. What it does has only
to do with covering mountpoints, nothing more (see the help).
Mike.
--
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Perdue)
Subject: Re: linux ADSL setup - name resolution problem
Crossposted-To: onenet.adsl,onenet.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.dcom.xdsl
Date: 4 Jun 1999 08:05:47 -0400
Look into gpm and the newer Xfree (3.3.3.x). I have mine set so the
wheel acts as a middle button. I haven't used the above to get the
wheel to work as it does in windows, but it is possible.
dave
D.L. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I'm not using dhcp - I have the dhcp server turned off on the Cisco 675,
: and I'm not using dhcp on the windoze98 side either.
: Anyway, I found that everything works ok in the 2.0.36 kernel, so
: I checked out /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes, tweaked a few
: things, and am up and running with the 2.2.9 kernel.
: ...now if I can just find a way to get my logitech wheelmouse
: wheel working in linux...
: D.L.
: In article <7il551$lu9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (somebody) writes:
: > Hi
: >
: > I think in the ifcfg-eth0 script (or whichever interface is connected to the
: > adsl line) the BOOTPROTO should be "dhcp" if you want to use DHCP for the
: > interface.
: >
: > Harland
: >
: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
: >>
: >>You need to put your nameserver addresses in /etc/resolv.conf
: >>No, you don't need to specify a DHCP server in Linux, but if you're
: >>using DHCP, you have to configure Linux to run the DHCP client.
: >>It's analagous to configuring Windows to 'get IP address
: >>automatically'.
: >>
: >>/RF
: >>On 18 May 1999 22:28:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D.L.) wrote:
: >>
: >>>Hello World! :-)
: >>>
: >>>I just installed SuSE linux 6.1, with kernel 2.2.5, and am
: >>>trying to set it up for ADSL, but am encountering problems with
: >>>the setup. I can ping my nameservers, but I can't resolve
: >>>names. Even 'netstat -r' hangs at the header.
: --
: D.L. Sharp / NU8H Cincinnati, OH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Kindred Spirits Hearth - http://w3.one.net/~dls/kspirits
: Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "SEAPEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP to IPX firewall & gateway
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 13:15:23 -0700
I think you may find your answer here.
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/IPCHAINS-HOWTO-6.html#ss6.9
Swartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:%kl53.37$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know of any tools that will allow me to configure a RH6.0 box
> with a ethernet/IP and a token-ring/IPX setup. This box is going to be a
> firewall using ipchains
> that protects our internal private ethernet from the corporate IPX
network.
> Can Linux do IP to IPX routing or translation? Can I use NAT to do this?
> Can linux act as a IPX to IP gateway?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Please respond via email.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Joe Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2.2.5-15 kernel eats memory!
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 15:43:17 -0500
I don't get this.. I'm running RedHat 6.0 with a minimum of services.. and
after a reboot, my free memory is only about 24MB(out of 64). A few hours
later, I have about 1.7MB free, and my swap starts to become active.. I do
not have many users, nor memory-eating apps.. it all seems to go into
"cached" memory.. Now cache is nice, but I don't want all my available
memory allocated to it! And I want to avoid swap usage... can anyone
help??
Here is output of "free" command:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 62860 60688 2172 36268 1668 42632
-/+ buffers/cache: 16388 46472
Swap: 24060 1068 22992
Thanks a bunch..
Joe
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help Me Identify an Ethernet Card
Date: 01 Jun 1999 22:26:41 +0100
"Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to identify several ISA ethernet cards marked "Gateway
> Communications, Inc.". I have done a web search and found nothing
> and tried to contact Gateway, but they require a customer number for
> technical assistance.
>
> The ethernet cards have an rj45 and db 15 connector, but no bnc
> connector. Jumper jp10 allows irq selections of 2 thru 15. The base
> address is selected through SW1, a dip switch; 1-4 selects the i/o,
> 2-8 selects the rom address.
>
> Below the dip switch is a barcode with the letters"AH03321". On the
> back of the board is: QEC-4V0 94V0 and 82200141-01, copyright 1992
> and the numbers 9316. The two chips are marked MB86960A 9229 Q23
> FUJITSU
Try www.chipdir.com.
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+actually
------------------------------
From: Charles Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPCHAINS / Netmeeting
Date: 4 Jun 1999 13:31:13 GMT
Jason, Could you repost your address: it doesn't appear to be right.
Thanks,
Charlie
Rage-DCA wrote:
> Ken wrote:
>
> > I am running RedHat 6.0 and have ipchains working but I can not get
ipchains
> > to allow NetMeeting inbound, outbound works fine. Does anyone have a
> > successful set of rules for ipchains/NetMeeting? I have been to
several how
> > to's and have tried several configs but still no luck.
> > Please Help if you have the answer
> > Ken
>
> check out my ipchains firewall script at http://rage.chroot.net/firewall.
>
> --
>
> Jason Osborne (Rage-DCA)
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - http://rage.dynip.com
> - LinuxInside - I run it, do you?
>
>
>
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: I having a trouble
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 20:51:15 +0800
I am having troubles with RedHat 6. After reconfig the kernel , I get a
message that says "modprobe: cannot locate module-net-pf-1".
Thanks for any help.
------------------------------
From: Kishore Sarathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: No Buffer space available error when trying to ping.
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 16:51:22 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I have a Pentium 133, with two D-Link 220 (ISA) network cards running
Redhat 6.0. I have recompiled
the kernel so that the driver for this card (ne2000) is part of the
kernel. The cards are detected fine at
start up and ifconfig does not report any errors. However, if I try to
ping myself, I get the following error:
ping: sendto: no buffer space available.
Telnet also comes up with the same error. I would appreciate any
pointers on what is causing this
problem and how to resolve it. Thanks in advance.
kishore
(PS: Please remove the word nospam from my email address to send email
responses)
------------------------------
From: Eric Yousey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Intel Pro/100+ and RH 6.0?
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 18:44:16 -0400
scott wrote:
>
> I plan on doing an FTP install. Does RH 6.0 recognize this card? It's listed
> as a tier 3 on RH's hardware list but I was wondering if anyone has any real
> world expereince with it.
>
> Please email me a copy of all responces. I dont get into usenet that much.
>
> Thanks
> Scott
I have a similiar INTEL card in my system and the Redhat Install picked
it up and used it just fine. So it should work.
Good luck.
--
Eric Yousey
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 6850552
AOL Instant Messenger: EYousey
http://members.aol.com/eyousey/index.htm
=========================================================
Team Leader of The Demon Sperm of Wright State University
Our attempt to win some money in the RC5 cracking effort
http://rc5stats.distributed.net/rc5-64/tmsummary.php3?team=3727
===============================================================
"Windows 98 is a buggy browser on top of a 32-bit extension and
a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating
system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a
2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition."
--unknown
------------------------------
From: Flare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multiple Domain Names - One Box
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:53:20 -0700
Alright, that makes sense. I really don't have any experience messing with
BIND, but it looks like it'd time to give it a good look. Thanks for the info.
bubba wrote:
> You betcha it's possible! Check out the O'Reilly & Associates book "DNS and
> Bind", and check out www.isc.org for more specific info on Bind. What you'd
> do (generally) is install bind 8 and setup the named.conf for multiple
> domains, and create separate zone files (1 for each domain you wish to host,
> or each resource you want to serve).
>
> IP masquerading would not be the way to go....unless you wanted to have more
> than one machine sharing your bandwidth.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cam Penner)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 & ipmasqerade problems
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 23:50:54 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I've installed ipmasqadm, but when I connect to my public IP through a web
> browswer, I get "Unable to connect to remote host." (Obviously, I'd like
> the browser to be seamlessly forwarded from my firewall to one of my
> private machines.) I've read all the posts, but none of which seem to do
> the trick. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
>
> (I finally tried redir, which did the trick, but doesn't do anything for
> forwarding udp packets, AFAIK. I think I need to forward UDP packets to
> accomplish my 2nd goal -- hosting games of Unreal from behind my firewall)
I went through this when I fought with Red Hat. (I eventually had
success, but I found a different way that suited me better, so RH got the
boot)
ipmasqadm is NOT used to forward connections from outside to inside.
This is where I spent/wasted a lot of time too. I believe you have to
use redir (ugly solution) or ipportfw (better solution). That's about as
far as I can point you since I went to a single floppy distribution of
Linux with the ipportfw already built in, along with some easy scripts to
add/remove forwarding options. I don't honestly know how it handles UDP
though.
Good luck.
--
Cam
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Schultz)
Subject: Re: Getting EVERYTHING to work through a firewall.
Date: 3 Jun 1999 19:06:21 -0500
I may be wrong, but I seriously doubt what you described will be able to work.
You can't set the firewall to forward all the ports to a specific host. The
high numbered dynamically addressed ports (1024 to 65534) are used by the
proxy/nat to sort out where everything is really going to.. Not to mention
the firewall is also using those ports to send out information to the real
internet host it is connecting to.. example: if you run tcpdump while
telnetting from your firewall to an outside host you'll see the firewall will
grab a free high number port to be used as the outgoing tcp port.. so when
the connection is made, everything is going from the firewall's port 1161
(just an example) to the remote host's port 23, when data comes back, it
will have a source port of 23, destination port of 1161.. So forwarding
all ports to another machine will just leave you with an inoperable firewall.
However if you forward all the ports BELOW 1024, it *might* work. (Once again
I may be wrong.. and if I am, sure as hell someone will be replying to this
message to correct me =))
There's a few kernel modules for some specific services that will let you
use IP Masquerading with them (quake, realaudio, vdolive, etc). Another
thing you can do is to find out what port the game is trying to connect to
and then use either ipportfw or redir to redirect those packets to whatever
host is your gaming machine. This will only work with TCP, and many games
use UDP for the transfers, in which case you're SOL.
If the games do use TCP, use either tcpdump or a monitoring program like
iptraf to find out what port it is trying to use, and just forward those
specific ports to your internal machine..
Hope this makes sense :)
Paul
On Wed, 02 Jun 1999 22:32 Nicolas Coderre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello.
>
> I recently set up IP masquerating for my tiny network. Everything
>works fine for basic tasks like web browsing and mail reading. But when
>I come to more advances programs, like Games, I hit a "wall". My
>computer inside my network doesn't have an IP address to the outside
>world. I was wondering if it would be possible to use the proxy's IP
>address, and tell the proxy to forward all those unknown packets to one
>computer in particular, so that at least one computer will be able to
>fully use the internet at a time. I was thinking maybe forward all ports
>to a specific internal IP address, EXCEPT those used by the proxy, so
>that all other computers on the network will be able to access the net
>regularly, while one has the priviledge of having the real IP address.
>Is this possible? does something do this already?
>
> Thank's for the help.
>
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help
Date: 4 Jun 1999 08:19:33 -0500
Srikrishnan Chitoor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have a Redhat Linux 5.2 system. I was connecting to my ISP using the
: traditional
: username-password login procedure.
: Recently, my ISP started supporting PAP as well as login. So I made the
: necessary
: changes and tried but somehow it does not work.
: I am attaching all the scripts that I use.
: When I was logging in to my ISP using the Login process, my username was of
: the form
: user@md3.
: I tried placing the 'name' value in /etc/ppp/options as 'user' and
: 'user@md3' and it still is not working.
You might try quoting the username with "" or '' in the secrets file.
And if the password has any non-alphanumeric characters then also
try quoting it.
The CONNECT '' should be replaced with CONNECT '\d\c' in the chat
script. This suppresses the carriage return that's otherwise sent and
which confuses some ISPs. The \d is a one second delay, for a very few
ISPs this causes a problem but with most it doesn't matter and for others
it helps.
As a matter of course I'd drop the pppd option escape FF which is rarely
useful and causes some ISPs a problem.
If this doesn't bring joy then post the chat and pppd messages from the
log file or files. These files are usually in /var/log but it varies
with distribution.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with Samba and Win Box
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 14:24:29 GMT
Also don't forget that Win98 uses encrypted passwords and win95 doesn't
by default.. So you are going to have to move one direction or the
other.. Plain text is easier to setup, but you gotta hack the registry
on the 98 machine..
HTH
SAM
In article <7j6mqo$bdj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01BEADCF.B5D31E20
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I am trying to set up a simple network using RH 5.2 as a Server for
Two =
> Windows Computers. One is Win98 and the other is Win95. I can not
seam =
> to get the right configuration. The WIN boxes can easily see
themselves =
> and the server can ping itself. Whenever I try to ping the Server
from =
> one of the Win boxes nothing happens. The Server will not accept any =
> Telnet sessions, FTP sessions or even a HTTP session. Why am I
hitting =
> my head against the wall over this?=20
> My questions:
> What protocols should be used by the Winboxes=20
> What client should it be set up for.
> And why cant these two different operating systems see each other!
> I have slowly be moving my way through the man pages about this
trying =
> different things. But even without the SMB server shouldn't the two =
> computers be able to communicate using just the TCP protocol for
access =
> to FTP, Telnet, and HTTP?=20
> please help me! (Obviously I am using a class C network)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01BEADCF.B5D31E20
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
>
> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
> http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#d8d0c8>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I am trying to set up a simple =
> network using RH=20
> 5.2 as a Server for Two Windows Computers. One is Win98 and the other
is =
> Win95.=20
> I can not seam to get the right configuration. The WIN boxes can
easily =
> see=20
> themselves and the server can ping itself. Whenever I try to ping the
=
> Server=20
> from one of the Win boxes nothing happens. The Server will not accept
=
> any Telnet=20
> sessions, FTP sessions or even a HTTP session. Why am I hitting my
head =
> against=20
> the wall over this? </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>My questions:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>What protocols should be used by
the =
> Winboxes=20
> </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>What client should it be set up=20
> for.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>And why cant these two different =
> operating=20
> systems see each other!</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I have slowly be moving my way =
> through the man=20
> pages about this trying different things. But even without the SMB =
> server=20
> shouldn't the two computers be able to communicate using just the TCP
=
> protocol=20
> for access to FTP, Telnet, and HTTP? </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>please help me! (Obviously I am =
> using a class C=20
> network)</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> =
> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01BEADCF.B5D31E20--
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot assign address when trying to bind
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 13:30:37 GMT
Hi
I am using Redhat Linux 5.2 with Kernal 2.0.36
I wrote a application using BSD sockets.
The type of the socket is SOCK_STREAM.
The address family is AF_INET
Port 8000
When I try to bind it gives me the error message
"Cannot assign the requested address"
But if the same process runs as a super user
then it does bind to the address.
But the client cannot still connect to the server
. The client basically times out .
If anybody cld help me in this regard
Also, I wld like to know if there is a tool
or a command or a configuration file entry
using which I can restrict/ permit network access
to users.
Thanks
RJ
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 14:53:44 +0000
From: Ted Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linksys Etherfast 10/100 probs
Last weekend I bought the linksys 10/100 network kit - 1 10/100 5 port hub and
2 10/100 nics.
After trying the latest tulip drivers (which failed) I compiled the tulip
driver provided
on diskette 2 - the drive includes instructions on the command line needed to
compile
the driver.
I then followed the instructions posted on the linksys website I used the
modules option. This
worked. I now have it running on both Redhat 5.0 and 5.2
There is also a diag program provided at the site where the tulip driver is
developed, you might
check that.
It took me several times to get it right, since I seem to have a problem
reading the man/faq and
following simple instructions. Also linksys does offer tech support, even for
linux.
hth
Ted "10/100" Potter
Hunter Ritchie wrote:
> Hey Jeff K. or anyone else,
> I just bought some Linksys NIC's. In my ignorance, I did not realize
> that had multiple chip sets. I have the proprietary (newer) Linksys chips.
> So I have to compile my own tulip.o module. I followed the instructions on
> the driver disk (with that tulip.c). I also attempted to download and
> compile the newest version on the net.
> Both files compiled, and I added them to the /lib/modules... dir.
> Unfortunately, when I attempt to update the dependency (/sbin/depmod -a) I
> get an "unresolved symbols(s)" error.
> I am a newbie and have pretty fairly exhausted multiple books and
> several online resources. Could someone enlighten me as to the nature of
> the problem. Should I be looking for a different driver file, a compilation
> error, or am I not uderstanding dependency correctly? Any help will be
> greatly appreciated.
> Hunter
--
Ted Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
415-479-4548
Linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I having a trouble
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 14:17:56 GMT
Check and make sure that you did a make modules and a make
modules_install before you reboot..
HTH
SAM
In article <7j8hss$qgl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having troubles with RedHat 6. After reconfig the kernel , I
get a
> message that says "modprobe: cannot locate module-net-pf-1".
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Before I screw up the internet....
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher R. Barry)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 23:56:01 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Martin) writes:
> The technology is a moving target, which can be exasperating. (I
> got IPFWDADM nailed down and guess what? Within two months, the
> Linux powers-that-be decided that it was obsolete and did away with
> it completely in favor of IPchains. Arrrgh!)
My distribution provided an IPFWADM migration script that maps the old
command-line invocations to ipchains invocations. It worked! (I only
used IPFWADM to set up rules for those cheesy graphical network
traffic monitoring apps everyone and their mom has on their desktop.)
> >I'm really lost right now. I don't know where
> >to look for help, and I'm curious how so many other people have
> >managed to learn this stuff.
>
> Easy! Start 20 years ago. :-)
Well, I ain't even 20 years old :-) I think I'll take a deep breath
and start again tonight. My current setup actually seems to kinda
work, but I guess I should know what I'm doing and make sure
everything is right anyways.
It's funny, I took a Unix class last semester and the teacher focused
exclusively on Linux network administration and ISP-type tasks instead
of the stuff I know good about Unix like X and programming.... He
would give us these huge, multi-page handouts and I would memorize all
kinds of crap about DNS record types and apache config files and nfs
issues without ever touching a computer and getting hands-on
experience. I'd actually memorize everything on the handouts without
knowing what it meant or what its place was in the big picture. I got
an "A" in the class; I feel like one of those people with a
high-school diploma that doesn't know how to read....
> Seriously, I apologize for the "tough love" approach. I hope it didn't
> obscure the (still valid) point that you shouldn't expect to master this
> stuff overnight (neither literally nor figuratively!).
>
> Invest the time. Lurk a while, experiment a bit. Linux is good for that,
> and the group is pretty helpful even if some of us do get a bit crusty at
> times.
Well, I have no choice but to learn this stuff, one way or another....
Christopher
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
