Linux-Networking Digest #411, Volume #11 Fri, 4 Jun 99 22:13:49 EDT
Contents:
Re: Ssh 1.2.27 available (Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak)
Re: kppp only works for root, not for other users (2.2.3 kernel) (Clifford Kite)
Re: Samba PLEASE POST YOUR smb.conf!! (K Berrien)
PPP + PAM error... need help!!! (leom)
Performance of Portfw ("Greg Bastian")
ASB error and auto 16/4 TR card (tomaz)
Re: dhcpcd error - sendto (renewing): Operation not permitted (Scot Thompson)
Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output... (Gutrot)
Re: diald ("Greg")
Re: CRAZY IDEA: Linux Box as TCP/IP Network Audio/Visual Server? (mike dombrowski)
Framing errors, still got 'em ("Clifton T. Sharp Jr.")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak)
Subject: Re: Ssh 1.2.27 available
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:57:48 GMT
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Schwarz) writes:
: trying to install it I get:
:
: rpm -Uhv ftp://attic.replay.com/pub/incoming/ssh-extras-1.2.27-1i.i386.rpm
: Retrieving ftp://attic.replay.com/pub/incoming/ssh-extras-1.2.27-1i.i386.rpm
: failed dependencies:
: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by ssh-extras-1.2.27-1i
:
: I have glibc-2.0.7-29. Should I update to RH 6.0 first?
Yes. Or you can recompile the source RPM (using
rpm -ba <file>.src.rpm). BTW, I am compiling 1.2.27-3i and 3us right now,
I will upload it soon.
-Yenya
--
\ Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at fi.muni.cz> http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/
\\ PGP: finger kas at aisa.fi.muni.cz 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E //
\\\ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ ///
|||| > Where do the -- MARK --s come from ? ||||
|||| It is the sound of Tux the penguin chewing on your system logs. ||||
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: kppp only works for root, not for other users (2.2.3 kernel)
Date: 4 Jun 1999 11:24:24 -0500
Debacker Marc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I recently upgraded my computer from kernel 2.0.32 and KDE 1.0 to 2.2.3
: and KDE 1.1.
: I had kppp working on the 2.0.32 kernel without any problems, both for
: root as wel as for ordinary users.
: But now with the 2.2.3 kernel, i'm not capable anymore to run kppp as
: non root user. I always get the error message 'pppd died unexpectedly'
: I checked the kppp manual over and over and over again, verified all the
: things in there, but i'm still without luck
: Firing up ppp using the ppp-on script as ordinay users works without any
: problem, as i followed the instructions indicated in the PPP-HOWTO.
: Essential messages do go in some files under /var/log, because i use the
: option -v for chat, and -debug and -kdebug 1 for pppd.
: The only thing i can find in the log files is ...
: can not reopen /dev/ttyS2: Permission denied.
You may need to upgrade kppp. There is a problem with some kppp versions
and pppd but the latest kppp should be OK.
: Has this something to do with the version of pppd i'm using (2.3)?
With the 2.2.x kernels you need at least ppp-2.3.5 and the latest is
ppp-2.3.8 .
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (K Berrien)
Subject: Re: Samba PLEASE POST YOUR smb.conf!!
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 16:07:24 GMT
On Mon, 31 May 1999 21:23:07 -0400, "Matt Goebel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After you modify your smb.conf, use the testparm program. This
will scan your config file for typographical/syntaxual mistakes.
>I managed to get everything to work, thanks guys. It turned out that
>everything was correctly setup as I had it but I had made a typing error
>that had screwed things up.
------------------------------
Subject: PPP + PAM error... need help!!!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (leom)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 00:41:09 GMT
I am trying to set up a ppp server on my Debian 2.1 Linux box.
ppp works fine dialing out to an ISP, but when I attempt dial in
to the linux box from a windows 9x machine i cannot get authenticated.
I have narrowed it down (thanks to others on this list) to a
probable PAM error, but I don't know where to start, or what to
look at to fix the error. My auth.log contains the following:
Jun 4 16:16:21 myserver PAM[501]: unable to
dlopen(/lib.security/pam_unix_acct.so)
Jun 4 16:16:21 myserver PAM[501]: [dlerror: /lib.security/pam_unix_acct.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory]
Jun 4 16:16:21 myserver PAM[501]: adding faulty module:
/lib.security/pam_unix_acct.so
Jun 4 16:16:21 myserver PAM_pwdb[501]: (ppp) session opened for user joer2 by
a_ppp(uid=0)
Jun 4 16:16:21 myserver pppd[501]: user joer2 logged in
Jun 4 16:17:01 myserver pppd[501]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jun 4 16:17:15 myserver pppd[501]: sent [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 "Unknown Linux-PAM
error (need to upgrde libpam?)"]
Jun 4 16:17:15 myserver pppd[501]: write: warning: Input/output error(5)
Jun 4 16:17:15 myserver pppd[501]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 90.0.0.254>
<compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jun 4 16:17:15 myserver pppd[501]: write: warning: Input/output error(5)
Jun 4 16:17:15 myserver pppd[501]: ioctl(PPPIOCSASYNCMAP): Input/output
error(5)
Jun 4 16:17:16 myserver pppd[501]: Exit.
/etc/pam.d/other file:
auth required /lib/security/pam_unix_auth.so
account required /lib.security/pam_unix_acct.so
password required /lib/security/pam_unix_passwd.so
session required /lib/security/pam_unix_session.so
/etc/pam.d/ppp file:
auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow nullok
account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
/etc/pwdb.conf file:
user:
shadow + unix
unix
group:
shadow + unix
Can anyone please point me in the right direction? I'm lost!
Thanks
Teri
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Greg Bastian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Performance of Portfw
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 11:35:32 +1000
Hi All,
To me, using a machine which forwards http and ssl connections to another
machine (using ipmasqadm and portfw) would be much more secure than having
that host sit openly on the internet.
Is there a downside to doing this ?
My dilemma is to expose a web site which has a database back end on a
different machine. I want the database to exist on our internal network, so
it can be accessed by our staff, and also provide it to the web server which
is constanly updating data.
I would love to have both machines on our internal network (as part of a
different domain with the corresponding nt security setup) and simply portfw
web and ssl requests at our firewall.
Is this a stable arrangement ?
Regards,
Greg.
------------------------------
From: tomaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ASB error and auto 16/4 TR card
Date: 4 Jun 1999 16:31:14 GMT
I've installed RedHat6.0 on IBM thinkpad 760ed. I've upgarded the kernel to
2.2.9 and pcmcia-3.0.11.
The network adapter IBM auto 16/4 TR works OK for a few seconds and then
the
ASB error in cmd 81 appears and the network is dead.
The settings I use are
mmio 0xd2000 sram 0xd4000 and sram size=16k
I have tried different setting withou any success.
Any hint would be more than welcome.
Thank you.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Scot Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dhcpcd error - sendto (renewing): Operation not permitted
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 18:01:32 -0700
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
==============ms0EB41535C966D003BB01A92E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
You might want to double check your firewall rules twice and thrice just
to make sure. I was having the same thing when I tightened my firewall
rules. Loosening them back up again did fix this problem. Here's
what's in my firewall script:
ipfwadm -I -a accept -W $intif -P udp -S $universe/0 bootpc -D
$broadcast/0 bootps
ipfwadm -I -a accept -W $extif -P udp -S $universe/0 bootps -D
$broadcast/0 bootpc
Note that bootps =67 and bootp = 68. I have the matching statements on
tcp protocol disabled. If you have these, then I don't really know what
the problem is. This _was_ the problem when I got those errors - I had
accidentally commented one of them out.
"W. Kiernan" wrote:
>
> My linux box (Redhat 5.2, 2.0.36) is connected to Road Runner in Tampa
> Bay as IP masquerade/firewall. The dhcpcd DHCP client can get settings
> to initialize the interface but when it tries to renew the lease after a
> half hour it fails. It retries and retries but I keep getting the
> following error message in the log:
>
> sendto (renewing): Operation not permitted
>
> So after one hour the lease expires and apparently INIT reinitializes
> the interface. This goes on for a few hours and then the Linux box just
> suddenly locks up the box completely. It's difficult to tell what's
> happening then, but I suspect that possibly Road Runner's DHCP server
> vends out a different new IP address or even a new host name and the
> whole system gets completely confused.
>
> I thought it might be an error in the firewalling rules where I was
> blocking the ports for DHCP, so I edited /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall so it
> allowed ALL packets on udp ports 67 and 68, both sending and receiving,
> but dhcpcd still fails. Also, I have tried both the original dhcpcd
> that came with Redhat 5.2 and a version specifically modified for Road
> Runner called rrdhcpcd by Joshua Jackson; they both give me the same
> problem.
>
> Has anybody got any idea why dhcpcd would fail this way? Thanks in
> advance for any help you can offer.
>
> Yours WDK - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
/ Scot Thompson
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============ms0EB41535C966D003BB01A92E
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature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==============ms0EB41535C966D003BB01A92E==
------------------------------
From: Gutrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output...
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 00:43:30 GMT
If you don't have Yast (ie SuSe linux) then you would enter nameserver
info into /etc/resolv.conf
-Gut
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (fahlis) wrote:
> Well,I had almost the exact same output,I solved it by
> putting in my ISP�s nameserver in networkconfiguration in Yast.
> Hope it helps.
>
> /fahlis
>
--
========================================================================
Build a system even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diald
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 21:44:37 -0400
I do not use Xisp or haven't but do use Redhat 5.1
here is my lay out
read the diald manual
/etc/diald # the diald directory
edit the diald.conf file # you "need" to read the diald manual for this.
I used the connect script that is in the directory, edit for your flavor.
I used the standard.filter and dumped it up at the accept tcp <nnn> any
*This seem to keep me on line during idle time...
/etc/ppp/options file keep this to what you must have included # read
manual.
One more thing I use chap and I had to add the name <user_id>
to the options file which I got away without before, but may have been a
hang up in one of the 10 hours it took me to set it up :)
oops one more /etc/rc.d/init.d/diald.init # I just use start and stop when
I want
to use it for now, a symbolic link to rc3.d if you want to start it up at
boot time.
have fun Greg.
Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings,
>
> I am running COL 1.3. and KDE. I recently compiled and installed
> diald. Is there anybody who
> is using this and could fill me in as to exactly which config files I
> need to have in place
> and maybe pass along a copy of these scripts? I have suspicions that
> the paths etc.
> that I have are specific to Red Hat etc. I am using Xisp right now. Am
> I supposed to
> have an /etc/ppp/ppp-dialer? Also, what files does Xisp alter?
> If I type "Diald up" it seems to lock up my entire network (which
> consists of the Linux
> box and a Win98 box). Samba no longer works and I can't telnet. If I
> type "Diald down"
> it doesn't seem to help. I have to reboot. Any help would be
> appreciated!
>
> Brian
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike dombrowski)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: CRAZY IDEA: Linux Box as TCP/IP Network Audio/Visual Server?
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 01:46:58 GMT
On 4 Jun 1999 04:54:24 GMT, Cyrus Mehta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I was wondering if the following was possible (or even desireable)
>
>I want to set up a home network for data,audio(stereo output), and video. I want a
>central
>consolidated server for the deal, I dont want to run Data wire, speaker wire, and
>COAX to every port
>and figure out a way to switch between all the different connections
>
>
>
>
>
>Suppose you have:
>a Linux Box (any Distro, any kernal you want)
>A TCP/IP 10/100BaseT network with CAT5 wiring
>Quality Soundcard
>Quality Video Card
>
>Is it possible to use the Linux Box as a server to send an audio/visual signal
>to network ports so that I could hook up a TV and/or some stereo speakers to a network
>port WITHOUT a client computer to receive the signal and translate for the
>TV/Speakers.
>
>I was thinking of a simple device that would connect to a network port and output a
>something
>relateively simply like an RCA type connection (you know left channel, reight
>channel, and/or video channel)
>
>
>Any thoughts, ideas, flames, go ahead......
>
>CKM
>
Nice thought but no. I was thinking of doing the same but there is no
such thing. You could have no soundcard in the main machine and a
junky video card and have a large harddrive and (I know you don't want
this) a client computer with sound/video to mount it's fs off the
server. Or you'd have to run 3 cable all over your house.
Mike
------------------------------
From: "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Framing errors, still got 'em
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 20:15:48 -0500
Complained earlier of framing errors (see below). Suggestion was to update
net-tools, which I hadn't done because of other problems. Finally worked
past the problems and got clean compiles of the net tools, installed them
and the new man pages.
Still got the framing errors. Yuck.
I get a *very* occasional framing error when I boot the same hardware and
connect under WfWG 3.11, so I'm sure it's not the chips 'n DIPs.
PPP 2.3.8, kernel 2.2.9.
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:2918 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2918 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:216.214.211.218 P-t-P:208.150.59.45 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1524 Metric:1
RX packets:14067 errors:330 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:330
TX packets:14566 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cliff Sharp | "Speech isn't free when it comes postage-due." |
| WA9PDM | -- Jim Nitchals, founder, FREE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- http://www.spamfree.org/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
