Linux-Networking Digest #422, Volume #11 Sat, 5 Jun 99 16:13:35 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux and ADSL with GTE (Joe Halpin)
ppp LCP problem (RLopez6836)
How can I masquerade more than one network? ("Bono")
SLIP to NO Modem... ("Edward Baichtal")
Re: PPP nightmare - HELP (Clifford Kite)
Re: IP Forwarding (Malware)
Re: Logs with RedHat 6.0 (Lim Chee Onn)
Re: 3C509 NIC and RH 5.2 ("Dave")
Re: PPP + PAM error... need help!!! (leom)
Re: SuSE Linux 6.1 & PPPIOCGUNIT Permission denied Error? ("Christopher A. Gaul")
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Detlef Bosau)
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Detlef Bosau)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joe Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and ADSL with GTE
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 13:28:49 -0500
Hervey Wilson wrote:
>
> I believe that GTE the Phone Company is a different company to GTE the ISP.
> GTE the Phone company provides the physical connection for ADSL and does not
> care which ISP you use (aside from some circuit numbers, etc). GTE the ISP
> _will_ care about which OS you use simply for support reasons as others have
> noted. You might want to consider using a different ISP - you may even get a
> better deal.
I tried to get them to clarify this, and ran into a wall. The guy I
talked (from the ISP side of the house) seemed to agree with you at
first. He said that if the ISP would support it, then it was fine. Then
he said that I would have to clear it with the phone side of GTE first.
I didn't understand how those two statements went together, but he
started stonewalling at that point, so I don't know what the deal is. He
gave me a number for the phone side of GTE, but it's closed now, so I'll
check it out later.
Anyway, thanks for the feedback, it gives me something to go on. It's
probably worth it just to let them think whatever they want, and setup a
Linux box, but I'd like to be sure there isn't some real reason why that
wouldn't work first.
Joe
--
I didn't want to be here, where the future is in store
but my name is on the mailbox, and my key fits in the door
- Bob Bennett (the musician, not the lawyer)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RLopez6836)
Subject: ppp LCP problem
Date: 5 Jun 1999 18:35:13 GMT
I am having a problem establishing a ppp connection with my university.I use
the 2.2.7 kernel on RedHat 5.2. Can anyone spot my problem? I am using ppp-on,
and ppp-on-dialer to make the connection. I have no problem telneting there
with minicom but it seems the handshake is going wrong when I use ppp. The
following are the messages I receive, followed by the bulk of the scripts:
Jun 5 13:03:09 localhost pppd[1332]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Jun 5 13:03:31 localhost pppd[1332]: Serial connection established.
Jun 5 13:03:32 localhost pppd[1332]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 5 13:03:32 localhost pppd[1332]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Jun 5 13:03:32 localhost pppd[1332]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1
<asyncmap 0x20a0000> <magic 0x629b5992> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 13:03:33 localhost pppd[1332]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1
<asyncmap 0x20a0000> <magic 0x629b5992> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 13:03:33 localhost pppd[1332]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x1 <magic
0xe73add01>]
Jun 5 13:03:33 localhost pppd[1332]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x1 <magic
0xe73add01>]
Jun 5 13:03:33 localhost pppd[1332]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2
<asyncmap 0x20a0000> <magic 0xa994e345> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 13:03:33 localhost pppd[1332]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2
<asyncmap 0x20a0000> <magic 0xa994e345> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 13:03:33 localhost pppd[1332]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <magic
0x252f95d0>]
Jun 5 13:03:36 localhost pppd[1332]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap
0x20a0000>
<magic 0xa994e345> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 13:04:00 localhost last message repeated 8 times
Jun 5 13:04:03 localhost pppd[1332]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jun 5 13:04:03 localhost pppd[1332]: Connection terminated.
Jun 5 13:04:03 localhost pppd[1332]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jun 5 13:04:03 localhost pppd[1332]: Exit.
LOCAL_IP=0.0.0.0
REMOTE_IP=0.0.0.0
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
DIALER_SCRIPT=/etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer
exec /usr/sbin/pppd debug lock modem crtscts /dev/modem 57600 \
asyncmap 20A0000 escape FF kdebug 0 $LOCAL_IP:$REMOTE_IP \
noipdefault netmask $NETMASK defaultroute connect $DIALER_SCRIPT
I have read the PPP HOWTO, and the options template file and tried all sorts of
different configurations of options to pppd, but nothing seems to work. I was
getting the message that some compression modules could not be found but put
aliases in syslog.conf:
alias ppp-compression-21 bsd_comp
etc.
Any ideas?
Thanks
-Mark
------------------------------
From: "Bono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How can I masquerade more than one network?
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 03:41:26 +0900
I'm currently running a masquerading server with a linux box.
It's working great.
Well, I want to add a new private network to my masqueraded network.
This is what I want to do:
a.b.c.d < 192.168.0.0/24 >
Internet---->masq server ----------------------
| |
client1(192.168.0.2) router1(192.168.0.3/
192.168.1.1)
|
|
<192.168.1.0/24>
|-----------------
client2(192.168.1.2)
I want to make clinet2 access internet.
Is it possible? How?
Firstly, what is the default gateway for client2?
Secondly, What shoud I do at the masq server to enable client2 access
internet?
For example,
should I add following command?
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 ?????
Thanks in advance.
Bono
------------------------------
From: "Edward Baichtal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SLIP to NO Modem...
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 11:19:15 -0700
Using RedHat 6.0, and I'm configuring a SLIP connection over COM1 across a
straight-thru cable to a serial port on another computer. The second
computer is running a DOS-based program which speaks SLIP over the 2nd COM
port when it's running.
Is there a /dev/tty device that acts like no modem? Is there some way I can
tell the Linux SLIP connection not to wait for a response?
The SLIP port on the DOS machine is not going to give an ACK or anything
else. It won't send a CONNECT, etc., but it will speak SLIP when spoken to.
I can talk to the port fine using a Win95 machine loaded with Netmanage's
Chameleon NFS and doing a SLIP connection using "Direct Connection - No
Modem" for the modem option.
That's why I want to know if there is a similar device equivalent in Linux
that will let me do a straight connection over the COM port and not wait for
a response.. or maybe another program I can try out in Linux? I'm sure this
has been done SOMEWHERE?!?!
Let me know... email me at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP nightmare - HELP
Date: 5 Jun 1999 14:02:36 -0500
Socrates Charalambous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I connect to my ISP with minicom, I get out of minicom without reseting the
: line and start pppd.
: It stays connected for about 20 seconds and then the connection terminates.
: This is what pppd logs in the /usr/log/debug
: Jun 5 03:21:56 seaquest pppd[137]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Jun 5 03:22:15 seaquest last message repeated 6 times
: Jun 5 03:25:26 seaquest pppd[153]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Jun 5 03:25:47 seaquest last message repeated 7 times
: Jun 5 03:27:40 seaquest pppd[172]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Jun 5 03:28:01 seaquest last message repeated 7 times
: Jun 5 03:29:45 seaquest pppd[180]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Jun 5 03:30:06 seaquest last message repeated 7 times
: I use kernel 2.3.0 and pppd 2.3.4
^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think so.
Anyway, using minicom to dial in for PPP is a poor way to go about it.
Use chat and pppd to dial in and connect:
http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Forwarding
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 20:21:38 +0200
Hi Umberto,
you wrote:
> Suppose my router is 151.99.125.1 my Firewall 151.99.125.2 and my host
> 151.99.125.3.
[...]
> What about my Host route table? Should i set the Router as default gateway or
> should I set the Firewall as default route?
If your firewall does ProxyARP you can leave the gateway set to
151.99.125.1. If not you will have to change it to 151.99.125.2.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Lim Chee Onn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Logs with RedHat 6.0
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 14:40:02 +0800
Joe Halpin wrote:
>
> I just upgraded to RedHat 6.0, and I've noticed that when I make ppp
> connections, I get logs like the following in /var/log/messages:
>
> Jun 4 14:44:03 localhost modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
> Jun 4 14:44:03 localhost modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-26
> Jun 4 14:44:03 localhost modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-24
>
> What is ppp-compress, and should I care about it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
Add the following lines to /etc/conf.modules
alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate
alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate
That will enable pppd to load the modules correctly.
Cheers
--
=====================================================================
Passengers of the mothership earth, these are your children speaking.
When disembarking, please leave a good clean environment behind.
Thank you.
=====================================================================
Alex C. O. Lim
Future Trend Computer Services
http://www.ftrend.com.my
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: 3C509 NIC and RH 5.2
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 15:41:59 -0400
u guys need to run the Utility floppy that came with your 3c509....turn OFF
plug and play... specify an IRQ and an I/O..... boot into linux.. set the
/etc/conf.modules file with :
alias eth0 3c5009
options io=0xXXX
xxx being whatever u set it as in the utility....
then at a shell prompt type:
"modprobe eth0"
"ifconfig eth0 up <ip address>
hope this helps.....
-dave
dss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7jbh5d$i4e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> - Please,
> - I have the same problem !!!
> - How I can solve this ???
> - Thanks,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> BTRiggs wrote in message <7j8tqm$f8t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I am running a 486 DX P120 with a 3Comm 3c509B NIC. When I set up RH 5.0
it
> >works fine, if I upgrade to 5.2 or 6.0 it can no longer find the card.
> >During the install or upgrade process I try to load the 3C509 drivers and
> it
> >comes back with "Unable to locate device". During the boot script it
reads:
> >eth0: delaying initialization
> >eth0...unknown interface
> >I was running on a split partition, Windoz and Linux. Now it is free from
> of
> >any hazards. But I still can't get it to see the card in anything other
> than
> >5.0. I also reset it so it is no longer using DHCP. Any assistance is
> >greatly appreciated.
> >Thanks,
> >mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Brian Riggs
> >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: Re: PPP + PAM error... need help!!!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (leom)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 19:44:07 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>Hi Teri,
>
>you wrote:
>> /etc/pam.d/other file:
>> auth required /lib/security/pam_unix_auth.so
>> account required /lib.security/pam_unix_acct.so
> ^
>
>Does look like a simple typing error.
>
>> password required /lib/security/pam_unix_passwd.so
>> session required /lib/security/pam_unix_session.so
>
>
>Malware
Oh yeah... jeez (writing "i will check my spelling" 100 times on
the blackboard). So I corrected this error, but I'm still
unable to log on. I'm getting the following in ppp.log:
Jun 5 12:25:26 myserver pppd[1611]: pppd 2.3.5 started by a_ppp, uid 0
Jun 5 12:25:26 myserver pppd[1611]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 5 12:25:26 myserver pppd[1611]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Jun 5 12:25:26 myserver pppd[1611]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x9cd8f587> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:25:26 myserver pppd[1611]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x9cd8f587> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x44b4d83> <pcomp> <accomp> <callback 0x602>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x3 <callback 0x600>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x9cd8f587> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x44b4d83> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x4 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x44b4d83> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x9cd8f587> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x9cd8f587]
Jun 5 12:25:29 myserver pppd[1611]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="joer2"
password="password"]
Jun 5 12:33:54 myserver pppd[1639]: pppd 2.3.5 started by a_ppp, uid 0
Jun 5 12:33:54 myserver pppd[1639]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 5 12:33:54 myserver pppd[1639]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Jun 5 12:33:54 myserver pppd[1639]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x6fb580cb> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:33:54 myserver pppd[1639]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x6fb580cb> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:33:56 myserver pppd[1639]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x4530cf4> <pcomp> <accomp> <callback 0x602>]
Jun 5 12:33:56 myserver pppd[1639]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x3 <callback 0x600>]
Jun 5 12:33:56 myserver pppd[1639]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x4530cf4> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:33:56 myserver pppd[1639]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x4 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x4530cf4> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 5 12:33:56 myserver pppd[1639]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x6fb580cb]
Jun 5 12:33:56 myserver pppd[1639]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="joer2"
password="password"]
Jun 5 12:33:57 myserver pppd[1639]: pam_unix authentication session started,
user joer2, service ppp
Jun 5 12:33:57 myserver pppd[1639]: user joer2 logged in
Jun 5 12:34:39 myserver pppd[1639]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jun 5 12:34:51 myserver pppd[1639]: sent [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 "Unknown
Linux-PAM error (need to upgrde libpam?)"]
Jun 5 12:34:51 myserver pppd[1639]: write: warning: Input/output error(5)
Jun 5 12:34:51 myserver pppd[1639]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
90.0.0.254> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jun 5 12:34:51 myserver pppd[1639]: write: warning: Input/output error(5)
Jun 5 12:34:51 myserver pppd[1639]: ioctl(PPPIOCSASYNCMAP): Input/output
error(5)
Jun 5 12:34:51 myserver pppd[1639]: Exit.
the /etc/pam.d/other now contains:
auth required /lib/security/pam_unix_auth.so
account required /lib/security/pam_unix_acct.so
password required /lib/security/pam_unix_passwd.so
session required /lib/security/pam_unix_session.so
and I deleted the /etc/pam.d/ppp file for now. I seem to be getting
logged in, but then I'm trapped with this PAM error. I don't have
any idea where to go from here...
Help!
teri
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Christopher A. Gaul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux 6.1 & PPPIOCGUNIT Permission denied Error?
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 15:58:04 -0400
Try setting up the pppd parameters with wvdial.tcl. This is covered
fairly well starting on page 141 of the SuSE manual.
Basically if you run:
wvdialconf /etc/wvdial.conf #creates your configuration file
automatically if it can
wvdial.tcl (from an Xterm) #setup your ISP and dialling parameters
this will create your ppp configuration for you.
once you run wvdial.tcl you can enter you provider info and hit test. If
it works ok hit save. You can then use wvdial to connect to
your ISP.
Christopher A. Gaul
CyberDyne Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Fellow (UK) Linux Users
>
> Has anyone out there in the UK gotten SuSE 6.1 Linux
> to connect to the Internet using ordinary DUN?
>
> I recently upgraded my old Slackware machine to
> use SuSE 6.1 and cannot get pppd to work.
> I can dial into the Demon Internet ROMP line, the modem
> dials in fine. I get a good connection the but as soon
> as `pppd' starts I get PPPIOCGUNIT Permission denied
> errors in the `/var/log/messages' and then the demaon
> exits.
>
> I am using ppp 2.3.5 and kernel 2.2.5 as the default
> supplied with SuSE Linux 6.1. I verified the permissions
> of the `/usr/sbin/pppd'. It is most definitely `suid'
> and I checked also that `ppp' support is compiled
> in the kernel. I am using root user to do the
> connection but still get an error. I checked
> that the `/dev/ttyS2' (COM3) is also a root
> read/writable, and also symbolically linked `/dev/modem'
> to `/dev/ttyS2'. So I figure that it must be something
> to do with `pppd' program.
> In any case what us a PPPIOCGUNIT anyway?
>
> Does anyone have a good summary or crib sheet
> about making an Internet connection with SuSE Linux?
> The old demon site Slackware documentation is old
> and less useful.
> `ftp://ftp.demon.net/pub/unix/linux/Demon/slack3.0.help.tgz'
>
> Thanks
>
> Pete Pete
> on windoze95 partition \-C "Waah baby cryin"
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Date: 05 Jun 1999 20:44:00 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Detlef Bosau)
Crossposted-To: de.comm.internet.routing
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] meinte am 05.06.99
zum Thema "Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken":
>
> Das ist das Problem: Windows und NT. Dein Problem sind nicht "zu
> grosse Broadcast-Areas", Dein Problem ist "zu undurchsichtiges
> Windows" - daraus aber zu schlussfolgern, dass alle groesseren
> Netze nicht mehr wartbar und damit "schlecht" sind, ist gewagt.
Nun, ich wuerde Dir ja gerne zustimmen.
Dem steht leider entgegen, dass ich so etwas unangenehmes
habe wie Kunden. Ich habe ja schon einmal geschrieben,
dass es in einem Netzwerk keine Probleme gibt sondern nur
Anwender. Und die nutzen leider verschiedentlich Windows NT.
Wenn ich es zahlenmaessig ausdruecken soll: Bei vielen meiner
Kunden kommen auf 10 Unix-Rechner als Server locker 2000
Server und Workstations unter Windows NT.
Das finde ich schrecklich, ich kann es aber nicht aendern.
>
> Ich hab' hier einige nette Netze, wo primaer Unix-Rechner
> drinstehen, gebridged (ueber eine 100Mbit-Ethernet-Strecke von
> COLT) ueber zwei Gebaeude, und es laeuft einfach, dass es eine
Natuerlich. Aber das ist eine Situation, die Du in Kundennetzen
schlicht nicht finden wirst. Ob Dich das freut oder nicht,
interessiert schlicht keinen. In der realen Anwenderwelt
ist das Workstationbetriebssystem Windows 95/98/NT.
Und damit muss ich leider leben.
Dass in einem Netz mit ausschliesslichem Unix-Betrieb auch
Router ueberfluessig waeren, weil ich da ein Single Large VLAN
aufmachen wuerde, und irgend ein Catalyst wuerde die Routing-
Funktion zum Provider uebernehmen, ist mir auch klar ;-)
Aber das ist nicht die Realitaet in der ich lebe....
Detlef
--
Detlef Bosau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bienroder Weg 79 Tel.: +49 531 303383
D2: +49 172 6819937
38106 Braunschweig, Germany Fax: +49 531 303364
>>>> PGP Public Key als Empfangsbestaetigung <<<<
## CrossPoint v3.1 R ##
------------------------------
Date: 05 Jun 1999 20:31:00 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Detlef Bosau)
Crossposted-To: de.comm.internet.routing
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] meinte am 05.06.99
zum Thema "Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken":
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Detlef Bosau) writes:
> > Das hat insbesondere den Vorteil, dass einzelne Ausfaelle als
> > solche richtig in die Topologie eingearbeitet werden und
> > moegliche Ersatzwege in kuerzestmoeglicher Zeit von allen Routern
> > gleichzeitig beachtet werden.
>
> Was auch ganz nett ist, das sind ,balanced hybrid' routing
> Protokolle wie z.B. OSI's IS-IS und Ciscos Enhanced IGRP.
Z.B.
Leider ist EIGRP proprietaer und nicht z.B. im gated vorhanden.
Das ist sehr schade. Wenn ich einen Router, der nicht von Cisco
ist, mit einem Cisco Router reden lassen muss, kann ich das
bis jetzt noch nicht mit EIGRP.
>
> Dieser Art von Routing Protokoll verwendet auch distance vectors
> aber mit akkuraterer metric, um den besten Pfad zum destination
> network zu bestimmen, als nur ,hop count'.
>
> Dabei triggern auch ,topology changes' routing database updates.
Meine ich doch. Es werden hier Topologiedaten gezielt verbreitet.
>
> Vorteil dieser ,balanced hybrid routing protocols' sollen sein:
> - weniger Bandbreiten Verbrauch
> - weniger Memory Verbrauch
> - CPU schonender
>
> In nur Cisco Umgebungen und bei nicht zu grossen Netzwerken ist
> Cisco's EIGRP sicherlich nicht uebel, in groesseren Netzwerken
> soll IS-IS EIGRP gegenueber Vorzuege haben (Hoerensagen).
Leider ist eben die Interoperabilitaet zu Nicht-Cisco Produkten (bei
EIGRP) nicht gegeben. Finde ich schade.
Detlef
--
Detlef Bosau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bienroder Weg 79 Tel.: +49 531 303383
D2: +49 172 6819937
38106 Braunschweig, Germany Fax: +49 531 303364
>>>> PGP Public Key als Empfangsbestaetigung <<<<
## CrossPoint v3.1 R ##
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
