Linux-Networking Digest #443, Volume #11 Mon, 7 Jun 99 18:13:30 EDT
Contents:
Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (more info) (Clifford
Kite)
Re: Sendmail configuration (FreeLorn)
Re: ISDN Dial on demand and setting own MSN number (Henning Schroeder)
Re: ipchains logging (Reality is a point of view)
Re: Log use of internet for every user? ("Roy W. Erickson")
Re: Measuring Network traffic ("Roy W. Erickson")
ipchains: eMail one way (Alfred)
Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (more info) (Malware)
Re: useradd problem under SuSe 6.1 (Malware)
Re: Multicast Tool (Malware)
Re: IP masq works, but can't read news (Franz Georg =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hler?=)
Re: Help! is pci nic compatible with 486 board? (Vidar Andresen)
Re: VPN through IP Masq ("John Hardin")
Re: Samba and NT Domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: NIC Cards needed badly ("Cliff")
Re: New knfsd trouble (was Re: NFS with Redhat 6 server and clients) (Dawood Alam)
Cable modem problem in Linux! ("P�r")
Re: SendMail (Andrzej Filip)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (more info)
Date: 7 Jun 1999 13:34:10 -0500
Srikrishnan Chitoor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have a Redhat Linux 5.2 system. I was connecting to my ISP using the
: traditional username-password login procedure.
: Recently, my ISP started supporting PAP as well as login. So I made the
: necessary changes and tried but somehow it does not work.
..
: *************************/etc/ppp/pap-secrets********
: # Secrets for authentication using PAP
: # client server secret IP addresses
: user@md3 * mypassword *
The fourth field (*) is not necessary unless you are trying to set up for
dial-ins to your computer. I've seen it cause trouble with some pppd
when used with a dial-out connection to an ISP, although I think it was
with ppp-2.2.0 .
..
: ***********************/etc/ppp/scripts/ppp-on-dialer**********
: # this is the one that i tried using now (for connection using PAP)
: #!/bin/sh
: #
: # This is part 2 of the ppp-on script. It will perform the connection
: # protocol for the desired connection.
: #
: exec chat -v \
: TIMEOUT 3 \
: ABORT '\nBUSY\r' \
: ABORT '\nNO ANSWER\r' \
: ABORT '\nNO CARRIER\r' \
: '' \rATZ \
: TIMEOUT 30 \
: OK ATDP$TELEPHONE \
: CONNECT ''
: *********************************************************************
Try changing the CONNECT '' to CONNECT '\d\c' . This will introduce
a second of delay and suppress the carriage return that is otherwise
sent and sometimes confuses an ISP into displaying a text prompt instead
of starting it's PPP.
..
: In both cases, this is what I got in /var/log/messages
: *********************/var/log/messages*************************
: Jun 5 16:45:57 vignesh pppd[523]: Connect script failed
: Jun 5 16:45:57 vignesh chat[527]: BUSY^M
: Jun 5 16:45:57 vignesh chat[527]: -- failed
: Jun 5 16:45:57 vignesh chat[527]: Failed ( BUSY^M)
: Jun 5 16:45:58 vignesh pppd[523]: Exit.
Can't cure the busies. ;)
..
: Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh pppd[530]: Serial connection established.
: Jun 5 16:47:18 vignesh pppd[530]: Using interface ppp0
: Jun 5 16:47:18 vignesh pppd[530]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
: Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
: Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Connection terminated.
: Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
: Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
: Jun 5 16:47:49 vignesh pppd[530]: Exit.
: **********************************************************************
There's a very good chance that the change in ppp-on-dialer will fix the
"not 8-bit clean" problem.
: Also I had to start PPP on the remote server after logging in. But now what
: should I do to mimic that??
You are no longer "logging in" in teh classical sense with PAP, the
remote should start PPP automatically once this problem is fixed.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: FreeLorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Sendmail configuration
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 18:21:01 +0000
Nick Kew wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> FreeLorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not sure if it is a problem at my end or at the other end, but
> > occasionally when I send an email to someone, I get a bounce reply of
> > 551 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...we do not relay.
>
> Look at the bounce headers to see where it's coming from.
>
> I can think of at least two likely causes:
>
> (1) The address you are sending to has a backup MX record for some third-
> party server that isn't correctly configured to accept mail for it.
> That's a problem of the domain you're sending to.
>
> and
>
> > # "Smart" relay host (may be null)
> > DSpost.demon.co.uk
>
> > steldin.shadows.org
> > arlen.demon.co.uk
>
> (2) post.demon.co.uk is refusing to relay mail sent "from" a non-demon
> domain, such as shadows.org. If demon are your hosts for shadows.org
> you should complain; otherwise you can either try asking nicely or
> stop using the relay host for shadows.org mail.
>
> --
> Nick Kew
>
> "I'm sorry, Mrs Gerontovic. Since your first husband was killed
> fighting the germans in 1941, you are a legitimate military target."
The problem is that I didn't put all the aliases in my files, i.e. I had put
in steldin.shadows.org but not steldin.
I have now and it works, thank you all for your help.
Rob
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henning Schroeder)
Subject: Re: ISDN Dial on demand and setting own MSN number
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 18:50:30 GMT
On Sat, 05 Jun 1999 18:47:28 +0200, Malware
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> Is ist possible to set my own (MSN) number to a different value,
>> depending upon which computer the packet that caused the outdial came
>> from?
>>
>> The reason for that is that i would like to have the the telephone
>> charges split, so that it is easy to see how much everybody has to
>> pay.
>
>It's an FAQ on de.alt.comm.isdn4linux. There are solutions available
>that work much better than this brain-dead one.
I could not find any solution on the d.a.c.i-FAQ, because there is no
FAQ at the moment (at least i could not find one) and the old one does
not cover the topic. Please help me in finding the solutions.
Henning
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Reality is a point of view)
Subject: Re: ipchains logging
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 17:44:21 GMT
+---- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (Sun, 6 Jun 1999 19:59:51 -0500):
| I have a hopefully simple question: I've enabled ipchains and
| masquerading, and everything is working well. However, I have logging
| set, which is currently logging to /var/log/messages. Does anyone know
| how to manipulate syslog.conf to log ipchains to a separate file (say
| /var/log/ipchains?)
+----
Looks like kern.info is the default, with the possibility of
modifying net/ipv4/ip_fw.c (search on "log") . . .
--
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Privacy on the net is still illegal.
------------------------------
From: "Roy W. Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Log use of internet for every user?
Date: 07 Jun 1999 10:48:51 PDT
Under RH6.0 the ipchains-howto show how the logging can be done, but it would
be by ip number, at best unless you start to seaching ip packets.
Jouw Naam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The problem is the following,
>
> My father is willing to invest in connecting all computers at home (4) via
> a linux box with ip-masquerading, but only when he can see a log of the use
> of internet for every user. Does Linux log the ppp connection, is it useful
> for me and in which file?
>
> greetings,
> Kaj ten Voorde
------------------------------
From: "Roy W. Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Measuring Network traffic
Date: 07 Jun 1999 10:54:32 PDT
The IPCHAINS-HOT has some ways to log things if you use masquerading..
Al Nios wrote:
> Is there any way to measure how much traffic (inbound and outbound) is going
> through my Linux's ethernet card? I need to know how much bandwidth I need
> to co-locate a server.
> netstat's info is hard to decipher unless I can somehow reset it and start
> from scratch (without rebooting of course).
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Al Nios
------------------------------
From: Alfred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains: eMail one way
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 17:51:23 GMT
Behind my Linuxbox with masquerading I can browse and receive emails on
my second box, but if a will send an email, it is rejected!
Any suggestions for me please?
--
- - - - - -
MfG, Alfred
- - - - - -
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (more info)
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 18:22:51 +0200
Hi Stephen,
you wrote:
> > Jun 5 16:47:18 vignesh pppd[530]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> > Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
> > Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Connection terminated.
> > Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
> > Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
> Just a long shot but are you supposed to use a different number for pap
> service? The "Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:" can be caused by
> trying to use pap on a connection that is expecting a username - password
> combionation. The "LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests: is also typical
> of this.
The problem could be shown within following line:
> > Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh chat[531]: send (^M)
Since ^M does not look like a valid start of a PPP frame the NAS might
switch into the old console mode. Replacing the line:
CONNECT '' \
within the chat script by
CONNECT '\c' \
or
CONNECT '\d\c' \
might do the trick.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: useradd problem under SuSe 6.1
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 18:53:56 +0200
Hi Vincent,
you wrote:
> I have a small problem with useradd under SuSe. When I add users the
> password isn't encrypted, so when a user tries to login it can't because
> the password isn't encrypted in the shadow file, when I use YaST to add
> users it is encrypted, but I need to add a lot of users a day and don't
It's for sure a failure of S.u.S.E. It seems to persist since ages.
Install a version of the user* scripts that is shadow-aware or use
pwconv. The man page should tell you more about pwconv.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multicast Tool
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 20:08:59 +0200
Hi Matt,
you wrote:
> Anyone know of a tool to detect multicasts on a network?
What kind of multicasts?
For IP-Multicasts and ethernet multicast tcpdump should be suitable:
tcpdump -i eth0 ip multicast
or
tcpdump -i eth0 ether multicast
About MAC-layer multicasts in other networks I have no idea.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Franz Georg =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hler?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: IP masq works, but can't read news
Date: 7 Jun 1999 21:42:00 GMT
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I set up a Linux IP-masquerading server. Both it and the Win95 box can
> send/receive email, telnet, http, ftp, ping. Only problem is reading
> news. Linux box is fine. Win95 box can get list of new groups, can find
> [...]
Set up inn (InternetNews) on your local LINUX box.
Inn acts as a local Newsserver and exchanges news between your Network
and your ISP's Newsserver.
-fgk
--
Quake II/Unreal �ber (Null)modem/Netzwerk? ==> http://privat.schlund.de/fgk
...und im �brigen bin ich der Meinung, da� AOL vom Usenet abgeklemmt werden
sollte.
siehe auch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Help! is pci nic compatible with 486 board?
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 03:17:53 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder) wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller) writes:
>
>[...]
>
>>Wait a minute here. You know what all the above is impossible.
>
>>According to my "Microsoft Networking Essentials" training, there are no ISA
>>100Mb NICs, and there is no PCI for 486?! Are you saying that the book is
>>wrong?
>
>Nah, we all know that MS wouldn't publish something unless they
>had PROOF :))
>
>Psst. Don't tell that to all the owners of 486 boards with PCI slots ...
Or anyone running a 3com 515 (3c515.c for linux-driver), i belive
Intel also have something.
But: Ethernet-HOWTO:
2.6. Programmed I/O vs. Shared Memory vs. DMA
[...]
The ISA bus can do 5.3MB/sec (42Mb/sec), which sounds like more
than enough for 10Mbps ethernet. In the case of the 100Mbps
cards, you clearly need a faster bus to take advantage of the
network bandwidth.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VPN through IP Masq
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:58:42 -0700
MikeH wrote in message ...
>Hi,
> I'm trying to access a VPN server from a client that is
> behind a box running IP Masq. The IP Masq machine
> is connected to the ISP with a cable modem.
>
> Does anyone specifically whether or not it is possible to
> run VPN and PPTP through IP Masq?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Mike H.
Yes, it is.
See ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight...
Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.samba,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Samba and NT Domain
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 20:10:07 GMT
Look at the man pages for host.access.
Briefly, add 'permitted' addresses or machine names to /etc/host.allow
to grant access, and host.deny to lock 'em out.
Example, allow 198.162.0 would allow all machines on the this subnet to
access any public directories.
In article <7ihbrg$3j2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've tried the suggestions that everyone's made, but I still can't
make
> it work. For some reason I can connect from MY NT Workstation, but I
> can't connect from any other clients. Let me be a little more
specific,
> when I try to open a share from a 98 client, it asks for a password.
> When I try to open a share from an NT client, it asks for a username
and
> password. All clients seem to be able to browse to the server. I've
> used smbpasswd -j ntdom to add the linux server to the domain. I
> currently have
>
> security=server
> password server=ipaddress in dotted decimal notation
> add user script=/usr/sbin/adduser -d home/samba -g samba %u
>
> I've also tried using the netbios name of the server in the password
> server option, and I've used the security=domain. I also have
encrypted
> passwords turned on. Thanks,
> Greg
>
> In article <7if763$505$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > If you already have an NT domain, you can use your PDC or BDC to
> validate
> > logon to Samba box.
> >
> > In /etc/smb.conf:
> >
> > 1) set workgroup = NT domain name
> > 2) security = server
> > 3) password server = IP address of your PDC
> >
> > Then restart smb (/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart)
> >
> > Your user should be able to see shares on Linux box, except one
little
> > thing - if user does not have account on Linux box, will not be able
> to see
> > home dir.
> >
> > But if your PDC is down, you need to change password server setting
in
> > smb.conf!
> >
> > Also solves the problem with encrypted password not working from NT
&
> 98
> > boxes.
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:7idctn$7a6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [SNIP]
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NIC Cards needed badly
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 21:39:46 GMT
You might want to look in the Ethernet HOWTO. I have used various 3Com
NICs, generic NE2000 Niches, a Digital Tulip, and a few others that I can't
even remember. I'd recommend the 3Com stuff; 3c509b for ISA, and 3c590 (I
think) for PCI. If what you got will work as a generic NE2000 then try
that.
--
-Cliff
Views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
Concordia Net, Inc. When replying via email please use; cwheat at concordia
dot net not
root@localhost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello could someone tell me where I can get NIC Cards for RedHat 5.2??
>I have read the http://www.redhat.com/hardware page.
>No luck in finding one of the supported NICs though.
>If someone could point me to a page that has supported NICs I would be
>very very thankful.
>Thanks In Advance.
>Vince
>
------------------------------
From: Dawood Alam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: New knfsd trouble (was Re: NFS with Redhat 6 server and clients)
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 22:45:38 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > My guess is that we are all using the knfsd package and Kernel-2.2.?.
> > In /usr/src/linux-2.2.?/Documentation/Changes file, it is
> > explicitly stated that "NFS is currently under heavy revision" to
> > work as a kernel-based NFS.
> >
>
> I am seeing problems with the knfs stuff also, but only with some
> clients. An OS/2 box can still mount a file system on the linux
> server normally, but an HP-UX box will show the mount point as
> established but will not be able to see the files. A bdf displays the
> nfs mount and the correct space utilization, even tho the mount dir is
> empty. Without even the . and .. entries.
>
> Any help appreciated,
> rick
I too am seeing problems exporting my linux fs to a sun sparc 5, I get the
error message:
kernel: svc: unknown version (3)
Should we be using the old nfs stuff, if so how do we jump bacl from RH6.0
knfs to the old nfs ?
Dawood
------------------------------
From: "P�r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cable modem problem in Linux!
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 21:37:35 GMT
Hi!
I live in Sweden where we just got internet thru the cable (Telia Internet
Cable)
When i try to configure my linuxbox to use the cable modem, it doesnt
work... :(
Im using dhcpcd (latest release) to configure the network adaptor, and it
seems fine until i try to ping or
reach another computer...
I have absolutely no idea whats wrong, i have been looking for errors for
almost 2 weeks now, but im getting nowhere...
Could you please check my dumps below if you find anything that looks
strange?
Below is a tcpdump output too, it says 'truncated-ip - 4 bytes missing!'..
my network adaptor is OK (have tested it in windows).
Does anyone know what this means?
I would really really appriciate some help!
Thanx!
/P�r Lindfors
dhcpcd compiled with the debug option :
=======================================================
[root@localhost /root]# dhcpcd
ClassID = "Linux 2.2.4 i586"
ClientID = "61.7.1.52.54.00.E3.D2.B8"
parseDhcpMsgRecv: 8 options received:
i=1 len=4 option = 255.255.252.0
i=3 len=4 option = 172.22.0.1
i=6 len=8 option = 10.0.0.1
i=6 len=8 option = 10.0.0.2
i=28 len=4 option = 172.22.3.255
i=51 len=4 option = 3600
i=52 len=1 option = "b"
i=53 len=1 option = 2
i=54 len=4 option = 172.22.0.1
DhcpMsgRecv->yiaddr = 172.22.2.222
DhcpMsgRecv->siaddr = 0.0.0.0
DhcpMsgRecv->giaddr = 0.0.0.0
DhcpMsgRecv->sname = "�"
ServerHardwareAddr = 00.00.F8.1F.9E.FC
parseDhcpMsgRecv: 12 options received:
i=1 len=4 option = 255.255.252.0
i=3 len=4 option = 172.22.0.1
i=6 len=8 option = 10.0.0.1
i=6 len=8 option = 10.0.0.2
i=12 len=0 option = ""
i=15 len=0 option = ""
i=28 len=4 option = 172.22.3.255
i=51 len=4 option = 3600
i=52 len=1 option = "b"
i=53 len=1 option = 2
i=54 len=4 option = 172.22.0.1
i=58 len=4 option = 1800
i=59 len=4 option = 3150
DhcpMsgRecv->yiaddr = 172.22.2.222
DhcpMsgRecv->siaddr = 0.0.0.0
DhcpMsgRecv->giaddr = 0.0.0.0
DhcpMsgRecv->sname = "�"
ServerHardwareAddr = 00.00.F8.1F.9E.FC
ifconfig :
(same values as i get in Windows...)
=====================
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:E3:D2:B8
inet addr:172.22.2.222 Bcast:172.22.3.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4382 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:248 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x6100
My routing table :
(Windows use default GW 172.22.0.1 aswell...)
(NOTE : I have 2 network adaptors... (eth1=192.168.1.1) )
====================
[root@localhost /root]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
172.22.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 172.22.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
tcpdump output :
(" truncated ip" ? , what is that? the NIC is brand new and its OK..)
===============
[root@localhost /root]# tcpdump -evvn -i eth0
tcpdump: listening on eth0
22:52:39.029393 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61185)
22:52:39.726329 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61186)
22:52:40.431472 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61187)
22:52:41.126766 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61188)
22:52:41.823705 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61189)
22:52:42.528851 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61190)
22:52:43.233994 0:aa:22:44:66:88 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 1476: truncated-ip
- 4 bytes missing!0.0.0.0.30587 > 255.255.255.255.30591: udp 1438 [ttl 1]
(id 61191)
------------------------------
From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SendMail
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 15:44:09 +0200
Norberto wrote:
> Please, can I make a multi-domain mail server on only one linux-box
> with Sendmail?
>
> Thanks in advance.
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.7
Q3.7 -- How do I manage several (virtual) domains?
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.28
Q3.28 -- Why isn't virtual hosting working, even after I added a
Kvirtuser line to
sendmail.cf?
--
Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip
http://www.bigfoot.com/~anfi
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I NO LONGER USE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posting history (all addresses):
http://www.dejanews.com/profile.xp?author=Andrzej%20Filip&ST=PS
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
