Linux-Networking Digest #511, Volume #11 Sat, 12 Jun 99 14:13:42 EDT
Contents:
Samba with NT workstation SP5 (Mark Palonen)
Re: samba and smbclient problem (Greg Leblanc)
IP Masq: compiling options into the kernel ("Matthew J. Hellman")
timed / timedc (Mike Wooding)
Laptop and Tulip drivers... [update] ("Otto")
killing/filtering out ping packets (daishi)
nic/automounting ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Routing Weirdness (Kevin Anderson)
Re: SOHO fast eithernet kit and linux ("Jim & Toni Dibb")
Setting up two ethernet cards -Please help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: GNOME & ppp ("Amelia A. Lewis")
Re: DNS Boggle ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: ppp and routing (Sam Cable)
Re: ADSL not talking to my box.. ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Howto tunnel smb over internet? ("Ashley Cambrell")
Re: DNS Boggle (Andy)
Re: StarOffice on Linux Slackware 4.0 (William Park)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark Palonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba with NT workstation SP5
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 13:20:38 -0400
I am running Samba 2.0.0 on RedHat Linux 5.2. The client is a NT
workstation service pack 5.0. Everything seemed to be working fine
for a few weeks. Then when I started to access the linux server it started
to recognize me as the user "nobody" which is in the log below: Here's an
oddity on top of this when a different user logs into the network from that
NT machine then logs out, and I re-log back in, the linux server seems to
recognize my account again. But If I try rebooting or logging back in
without someone else logging in before me linux recognizes me as the user
nobody.
[1999/06/11 04:00:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488)
erhnt (204.215.156.58) connect to service dev as user nobody (uid=99,
gid=99) (pid 31677)
[1999/06/11 04:00:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488)
erhnt (204.215.156.58) connect to service tools as user nobody (uid=99,
gid=99) (pid 31677)
[1999/06/11 04:00:39, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:map_share_mode(399)
map_share_mode: Incorrect value 0 for desired_access to file \
[1999/06/11 04:00:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488)
erhnt (204.215.156.58) connect to service unix as user nobody (uid=99,
gid=99) (pid 31677)
[1999/06/11 04:00:39, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:map_share_mode(399)
map_share_mode: Incorrect value 0 for desired_access to file \
[1999/06/11 04:00:40, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488)
erhnt (204.215.156.58) connect to service library as user nobody (uid=99,
gid=99) (pid 31677)
[1999/06/11 04:00:40, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:map_share_mode(399)
The users here are mapped from there NT accounts to their NIS accounts when
they access the server. I haven't changed any configuration on the server.
Below is the share for the volume that the machine is accessing and the
global configuration file along with it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
[dev]
comment = Development
path = /raid/dev
guest ok = yes
writable = yes
public = yes
[global]
protocol = NT1
workgroup =
server string =
status = yes
hosts allow = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
# hosts allow = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
lock directory = /var/lock/samba
netbios name = Linux3
locking = yes
max log size = 50
security = server
password server = ntserver1
# socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=4096
SO_SNDBUF=4096
alternate permissions = no
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
username map = /etc/smbusers
short preserve case = yes
preserve case = yes
case sensitive = no
map archive = no
oplocks = false
create mask = 775
directory mask = 775
force create mode = 775
force directory mode = 775
dos filetimes = True
------------------------------
From: Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: samba and smbclient problem
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 16:06:16 GMT
In article <YCe83.383$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never mind - I figured it out. You MUST have file and print sharing
enabled
> for TCP/IP if you want to access a Windows 95 system from a linux
system. I
> had turned it off because I didn't want anybody getting access to my
machine
> over the internet when I was connected to the internet. But, I had
left
> file and print sharing on for NETBIOS. Very interesting - and a
potential
> security problem on the Windows95 systems.
Do you mean NetBIOS, or NetBEUI? I thought that you bound file sharing
to protocols that were in the components list in network properties.
NetBIOS can run over NetBEUI, IPX/SPX, or TCP/IP, unless I'm forgetting
about 95 with all this NT work I'm doing. If you had it enabled for
NetBEUI, it obviousally wouldn't work because I've never seen that as an
option for Linux, let alone seen it enabled. Later,
Greg
>
>
--
It's pronounced "sexy" not "scuzzy"!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Matthew J. Hellman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masq: compiling options into the kernel
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 12:57:35 -0500
According to the IP MASQ HOWTO there are certain options you can compile
into the kernel. Is there a way for me to check which options are
compiled into the current kernel? I am about ready to read the kernel
HOWTO for more info, perhaps that has what I'm looking for?
TIA,
Matt
--
** To reply, remove all uppercase letters from email address
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs,
even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor
spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much because they live in
the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.
--Theodore Roosevelt
------------------------------
From: Mike Wooding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: timed / timedc
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:58:48 -0700
I'm running a linux( 2.2.5-15 from RedHat) news server
on a network with a number of SCO5.0.4 systems. I would
like it to keep time with the other systems on this
network. When I show the time with date, it appears they
are close - within a seconds or two, but when I run:
/usr/sbin/timedc clockdiff serman
time on serman.wse.com is 25042792 ms. ahead of time on
linuxman.wse.com
The hardware clock is set to the system clock time
The time difference is approximately the difference between
GMT and PDT which is what date shows to be the TZ on both my
Linux and SCO systems ...
Is this just an incompatability between Linux and SCO or
perhaps I missed something in the setup?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Wooding)
------------------------------
From: "Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Laptop and Tulip drivers... [update]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 03:10:31 GMT
I have a Hitachi VisionBook Pro 7755, with built-in network card, the NIC is
HITACHI HIAE-80/100 PCI.
Redhat 6.0 incorrectly detects it as DEC21040 and someone advised me to
update the driver and recompile the kernel, which was done and the kernel
was also updated to the 2.2.9 version. The eth0 is started by the kernel
"OK", the problem is that the card is broadcasting for about 3-4 minutes
then quits and during this time the network isn't accessible.
Once it's done, pinging works on the card but not sending/receiving any
pockets. The obvious choice would be a bad NIC, but it works just fine under
NT. The network is configured properly, it's a rather simple network.
Does anyone have an idea, other than using a different card?
Thanks....
Otto
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (daishi)
Subject: killing/filtering out ping packets
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 18:12:19 GMT
I would like to disable/kill/filter out ping packets into my linux
box. I know you can crash/lock basicly any box if you ping someone
with a really large packet. so how do I go about filtering out ping
packets? do I have to setup a firewall, or something else?
btw that is a dial-up connection, not a network connect to the
internet (and YES I am paranoid, he he he)
thanks in advance
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nic/automounting
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:50:56 GMT
I have two questions to ask...
1. I have set up Redhat 6.0 on a Gateway computer and I am now trying
to setup the networking and having no luck. I was wondering if anyone
out there has successfully made a SMC EZ 10/100 PCI nic work with Redhat
6.0? I have tried using the smc-ultra, smc-ultra32, and wd modules with
no success. Every time I start up the machine or try and restart
networking I get the message "Delaying initialization of eth0" [FAILED]
2. I am setting up linux in a multiuser environment (University
computer labs) and need to setup user home directories. Because of the
insecure envrionment of the labs we don't want to use nfs. I am
wondering if there is a way to have amd or autofs mount a samba share as
the home directory for the user. I have successfully made smbmount work
in my environment, but I have not seen a way in the documentation of
automounting a samba share.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Mike Mercier
System Support
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge, Alberta
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Kevin Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing Weirdness
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 18:10:02 +0100
I'm relatively new to linux, and have an odd problem:
I have two border routers, one to another siteand one default to
internet. The reoute table entries are :
192.0.2.0 194.73.58.171 255.255.255.0 UG 1500 0 0 eth0
for the other site and
0.0.0.0 194.73.58.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0 eth0
for default. When I ping/traceroute a system on the other lan it works
fine, I deduce my linux setup is therefore OK. When I ping for example
www.redhat.com, I get no reply, and traceroute shows me stars. All my
other system - SCO, WinNT, Solaris, work fine and see both the other
site AND internet sites.
Anyone seen similar or got any ideas??
TIA
Kevin Anderson
------------------------------
From: "Jim & Toni Dibb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SOHO fast eithernet kit and linux
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:27:44 -0400
There was a reply that the latest version of the tulip driver will work for
the NDC SOHOware cards, but I've had no luck. I just downloaded the new
driver and tried it with no luck. Others have had problems as well
Other comments made by another user warned against hub speed, the setup I
bought came with 10/100 cards, and a 10Mbps hub. The 100 Mbps hub raised
the price of the kit by almost 80%. I didn't think it was worth it on my
little 2 node network.
The cards work fine under windows95/98, but so far they're a no-show under
linux.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7jn9ne$675$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm looking at getting a LAN up in my house since
>I am getting another computer. I've been looking
>at the SOHO fast eithernet kit since it's cheap
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setting up two ethernet cards -Please help
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 09:48:18 -0500
Hello, I am still trying to get two Intel etherexpress cards working on my
machine. I am running RH5.2. I now have the following in my conf.modules:
alias eth0 eexpress
options io=0x300,0x310 irq=5,9
alias eth1 eexpress
Now when I run ifconfig on eth0 the following is EXACTLY what I get for output:
Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:AA:00:DC:00:85
inet addr: 0.0.0.0 Bcast: 0.0.0.0 Mask: 0.0.0.0
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:5 Base address: 0x300
and when I run ifconfig on eth1 I simply get uknown interface. Now
obviously something is wrong with this.(the inet addr, Bcast, and Mask
should not all be 0's for starters.) I don't know what else to do. I have
set up things in /etc/sysconfig/network, /etc/networks, /etc/hosts. There
is obviously something I am missing. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
The most frustrating thing about this is that eth0 was working until I
started trying to get eth1 to work :)
Thanks agian,
Seth Norris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Amelia A. Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GNOME & ppp
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:09:06 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Gavin wrote:
>
> resolv.conf file looks like this:
>
> order hosts,bind
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
OK
> hosts looks like this:
>
> localhost 127.0.0.1
> omega 192.168.0.1
Not OK
> (omega is the name of my computer.)
> I'm pretty sure named has nothing to do with it, since if I stop it, and
> change resolv.conf to use my ISP's dns servers, it still only works if
> PPP is up. Is there something special I need to do?
PPP has to be up because your hosts file is corrupt, and no names can be
resolved using it.
That's a guess, mind.
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
192.168.0.1 omega.[your.net.name] omega
I assume that you have omega in there because you also have an
unmentioned LAN NIC installed ... otherwise, of course, pppd needs to
set the host ip address on dialin. Simple way:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost omega
Amy!
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS Boggle
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 10:10:15 -0700
Hello,
Try to use nslookup command at the prompt when you are connected to the Net.
$ nslookup <http server name>
It could be that this server does not have an entry in DNS database.
You can try the to do the same with one of the popular servers (fe.:
www.yahoo.com)
Good luck!
Andy wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello all,
>Recently I got my ppp connection working under Linux. However, when I
>try to ping an http name address I don't get a reply. I have no
>problems when I ping an IP address. I did edit my resolv.conf to
>include the nameservers. I even called my ISP to double check that I
>have the right IP adresses of the name servers. Anyone have any ideas?
>TIA,
> Andy
>
>
------------------------------
From: Sam Cable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp and routing
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 12:41:22 -0500
Apocalypse wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with connecting a Linux box to my ISP. The ip is dynamic
> and ppp connects with no apparant problems.
Well, take heart. You're doing better than I am. I can't get a
connection in the first place. I have tried configuring with almost
every tool Red Hat 6.0 supplies. Could you tell me if you did anything
special to get to this point? Thanks.
--Sam
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ADSL not talking to my box..
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 10:24:47 -0700
Hello,
By looking at your winipcfg output and output of ifconfig I can tell that
your machines are on the different subnets.
DHCP assigned address for win95 is 192.168.200.1 and Linux box has
192.168.1.4...this looks very strange!
Can you include output of ifconfig and netstat -rn commands please.
Also using web browser to test connectivity is not very good idea, try using
ping to the address vs name, or traceroute.
Good luck!
Jerry L Kreps wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Dang H. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Jun 1999 01:27:01 -0500, Jerry L Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I decided to go ADSL on my phone service to get a faster Internet
access. My ISP gave me a Cicso
>> >675 router programmed as a DHCP Server. It is connected to the phone
jack on the wall and to the
>> >Fast EtherLink XL 10/100B TX NIC in my box. The DNS search is
navix.net, and two nameservers:
>> >207.91.5.20 and 207.91.5.252. My box is JLkreps.At.Home with an IP of
127.0.0.2 and I am running
>> >SuSE 6.1 with the kernel upgraded to 2.2.7.
>> >
>> >SuSE supplies a configuration program called YaST, which is has menu
options to set up the Name
>> >Server, HostName, Base Configuration and DHCP CLient. When the box is
booted the DHCP Client
>> >gets an IP address, always 192.168.1.4, from the Cisco DCHP Server and
sets up a routing table.
>> >The only problem is the routing table is not any good, I can't see the
internet. My next thing is
>> >to download the lastest version of DCHPCP and compile it into my system.
I've spent thirty hours
>> >playing with ifconfig, route, netstat and the like, trying to create
something that would let
>> >Netscape walk the web via my ADSL.
>> >
>> >The SuSE YaST program leaves the TCP/IP config files in the following
condition...
>> >This info represents all that YaST leaves me with. I can always ping
the NIC. The bad news is
>> >that navix.net and it's numbers are always left out of the mix. The
DHCP Client ALWAYS pulls the
>> >192.168.1.4 number and gives it to the NIC. I don't know why SuSE
leaves navix.net out of the
>> >picture when I gave it the name server info during the YaST setup.
>>
>> do you know why the cisco dsl modem is giving your nic a non-routable
>> lan only ip?
>
>Thanks for replying, Dang!
>Good question... no. I am currently running on my Win95 side through the
ADSL, so I know the NIC work and
>the Cisco 675 works.
>
>> 192.168.x.x are reserve for use in a local area network and will not
>> be routed on the internet.
>
>True, but on my Win95 I am connected to the Internet and the winiipcf
program shows:
>DNS Server: navix.net
> 207.91.5.20
> 207.91.5.20
>
>IP Address 192.168.200.2 <--- always this, even after cold boot.
>Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0
>Default gateway 192.168.200.1
>DHCP Server 192.168.200.1
>
>Does this seem to suggest that the Cisco router is setup as a bridge?
>
>I've tried these numbers on the SuSE side by doing an ifconfig eth0 down,
and then using iconfig to bring eth0
>back up with these numbers. And, in the YaST setup of SuSE I can put an IP
address on the NIC, and it will
>stay. Either way, it makes no difference - no connections ("unable to
reach the network"). When I strip the
>IP address off of the NIC, deactivate it and to a cold reboot, the
192.168.1.4 address always appears.
>
>> does the dsl modem acts as a masquerading server?
>
>The booklet says "The Cisco 675 router is an ADSL modem used for home
connectivity to an ADSL service provider
>over an ADSL/ATM physical layer.... The Cicso 675 router operates usng the
Cisco Broadban Operating System
>(CBOS)."
>The CBOS can be setup as either a bridge or a router. IF it were setup by
the ISP as a bridge then it can
>operate in the RFC1483 mode or the PPP/BCP mode, but not both. "
>
>I don't know which way it is set up because I don't have the special cable
that connects my serial port to the
>Cisco Manager port. And, since I wasn't given the cable to connect to the
Management port of the Cisco, I
>would guess that the IPS put a password on the CBOS to prevent the user
from changing the Cisco's
>configuration.
>
>The manual says the following: "When the Cisco 675 operates in the bridge
mode, it behaves like a wire
>connecting a local PC directly to a service provider's network. Because
bridges operates at a MAC layer only,
>applications requiring IP communication, such as Telnet, TFTP, RADIUS,
Syslog, Ping and the web interface, are
>not available unless a management VC is configured."
>
>The setup is splitterliess, with EZ-DSL Microfilters at each phone. The
ISP provided the crossover cable
>because I am a single PC with an Ehternet NIC, and not connected to an
Ethernet hub, i.e., I don't have a
>small network on my side of the router.
>
>> check ifconfig to see if the ip address is assigned correctly.
>
>What would be the 'correct' setting, a class C IP address? It has never
shown that, as I've relayed above.
>
>After booting, warm or cold, ifconfig always shows the NIC as having an IP
address of 192.168.1.4 with a
>netwmask of 255.255.255.0 and a broadcast of 192.168.1.255.
>
>
>> From what I've deal with ADSL, you actually need to get a real ip
>> address for it to work, not one of them lan only ones. the dsl modem
>> acts more as a bridge than a router.
>
>I don't think that possibility would be allowed by the ISP.
>
>>
>> let me get this straight, you assigned your nic 127.0.0.2 but the dhcp
>> server assigns your nic 192.168.1.4. which is the correct ip?
>
>No, I assigned my localhost, named JLKreps.At.Home, the IP address of
127.0.0.2. But, if I assign IPADDR = ""
>with YaST (SuSE's config tool) and run SuSEconfig, which deactiveate the
eth0 device, removing any IP address
>from it's setup, then do a cold boot, the DHCP Client software fetches an
IP adress from the router (I am
>assuming) and ifconfig shows the eth0 device as the Cyclone 3c905B
10/100BTX with the 192.168.1.4 stuff.
>
>In deparation, however, I have assigned the NIC my localhost IP address.
I've also stuck the 207.91.5.20
>address in the NIC, but it doesn't allow any connections. I generally use
Lynx to see if I can connect to the
>Internet after I've entered a configuration. It usually says it can't find
the Internet.
>When I have the following setup:
>
>127.0.0.1 localhost, loopback
>0.0.0.0 default
>127.0.0.2 JLKreps.At.Home
>192.168.1.4 eth0 (ifconif shows the 3c905B Cyclone having that address)
>255.255.255.0 netmask for NIC
>192.166.1.255 broadcast for NIC
>
>then lynx responds "looking up Yahoo.com" when I ask it to to to that
website. The Cisco "LAN" and "WAN
>activity lights blink back and forth for a long while but nothing happens.
When I fire up KDE and run Netscap
>and click on the home page button netscape display the 'looking for ..."
message and appears inactive while
>the Cisco LAN and WAN lights blink back and forth for a long while, then
only occasionally. Netscape appears
>to be waiting or is hung. I have to kill it to close it.
>
>> what I would do is make the adsl line works on another OS before
>> trying to fix Linux. Get a windows box and see if you can get it
>> online.
>
>It's working now on my Win05 side as I am writing this msg. See the
Winiipcf info above.
>Jerry
>--
> __ _
> / / (_)__ __ ____ __ * Powerful * Flexible * Compatible * Reliable
*
> / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / *Well Supported * Thousands of New Users Every
Day*
> /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ The Cost Effective Choice - Linux Means
Business!
>
------------------------------
From: "Ashley Cambrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba,mailing.unix.samba
Subject: Re: Howto tunnel smb over internet?
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 03:47:52 +1000
Can VPN link two entire networks though? (linux samba to linux samba)
I didn't think it could..
Ashley Cambrell
Andrey Smirnov wrote in message ...
>Hello,
>
>Check out Linux VPN howtos:
>
>ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html#HOWTO
>
>Good luck!
>
>Ashley Cambrell wrote in message
><7jtv0e$kis$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I was just wondering if it was possible to tunnel smb through the internet
>>and link two office networks? Both offices are using samba servers and
>both
>>have WINS.
>>
>>192.168.1.101-1xx 192.168.1.100[x.x.x.x] [x.x.x.x]
192.168.1.200
>>192.168.1.201-2xx
>>[win9x network] <--------> [samba
>>server]<--Internet-->[samba]<---------------->[win9x network]
>>
>>^^^ethertap^^^
>>
>>Is it as easy as using a ethertap tunnel system, or is it much more
>>complex...
>>
>>Thanks for the help in advance!!
>>
>>Ashley Cambrell
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS Boggle
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 12:24:00 -0500
Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Try to use nslookup command at the prompt when you are connected to the Net.
>
> $ nslookup <http server name>
>
> It could be that this server does not have an entry in DNS database.
> You can try the to do the same with one of the popular servers (fe.:
> www.yahoo.com)
>
> Good luck!
>
Well, I gave it a try... nslookup just hangs until I ^c to break it...
Anyother ideas?
TIA,
Andy
------------------------------
From: William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: StarOffice on Linux Slackware 4.0
Date: 12 Jun 1999 17:32:47 GMT
Roberto Nunnari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
> Can anybody tell me if it's possible to install StarOffice
> on a Linux Slackware 4.0 system? Do I need any extra libs?
I should think so. I installed glib[12].tgz on top of Slackware-3.3,
and it ran. However, Config-HOWTO says you shouldn't install
lthreads.tgz.
> Best regards.
> --
> Roberto Nunnari -software engineer-
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AGIE - http://www.agie.com
> Via dei pioppi 16 tel: +41-91-8069138
> 6616 Losone """
> Switzerland (o o)
> =======================oOO==(_)==OOo========================
> MY OPNIONS ARE NOT NECESSARELY THOSE OF MY EMPLOYER
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
