Linux-Networking Digest #545, Volume #11 Tue, 15 Jun 99 19:13:37 EDT
Contents:
DLink 530 *Tulip* HOW TO? (Rich ''Doc'' Colley)
Long delays during service requests + where is a POP server?? ("Hippy")
Behind firewall.. getting out? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: eth0 failure! please help (Jacob Smullyan)
Re: in.ftpd : login failed ("George Georgakis")
Re: PPP (Gilford Wimbley)
Re: What do rc0.d, rc1.d, rc2.d do? ("David Means")
DNS - strange behavior ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: WIn 95 printing over SAMBA ("Maguai")
Re: Squid does not work :(' ("Maguai")
Re: WIN98 and REDHAT5.2 ("Maguai")
Re: Linux Win98 Networking Problems!! (Rafo)
Re: Help!!! I would like to use my linux box as a proxy sever/router ("Maguai")
Re: @home connection? ("Maguai")
Help with Win95 net printer via SMB (Peter)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest
News (Philip Brown)
Re: Diamond Supra Express 56i PRO Pci modem (Frederick Haab)
Comtrol RocketPort (Chukwuweta Chukwudebe)
Re: RSH problem from Linux to Solaris 2.6 (Darryn Rose)
trying to get net up. ethernet (B'ichela)
SV: SAMBA newbie ("thomas")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rich ''Doc'' Colley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DLink 530 *Tulip* HOW TO?
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 19:40:25 -0700
As someone NEW to Linux, I am impressed with the
'energy' in the forums and on the various sites.
I have installed (successfully) my FIRST LINUX server,
BUT cannot figure out how to use the DLink Driver I
downloaded for the 530 NIC. It came from the 'official'
LINUX nic driver site, linked to DLINK. But how
do I use this 'module' (if that is what it is... called
"via-rhine.c" ) I know that LINUX doesn't automatically
find the NIC as it is not supported in 5.2 (?? Hmm wonder
about 6.X??)
Greatly appreciate any howto's on this in a more
lucid text than the few I've found.. like, step1, step2
and so forth.. Thanks very much.
--
Rich "Doc" Colley
CNE4
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Hippy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Long delays during service requests + where is a POP server??
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:32:30 +0100
Hiya everyone,
I have a win98 machine and a linux box (RedHat v6.0). They can talk to
each other with no problem (pings always work with no delay). But, there's a
huge delay when trying to initiate connections to services.
I've tried telnets, ftps and https. All of them can produce a delay for
up to a minute at a time. When you're trying to browse the linuxconf web
version, it's a real pain (putting it mildly:) because it delays for every
page load. I'm pretty sure that the problem's on the linux box - I can see
the net traffic which shows the win98 machine performing retries. Once
connected (i.e. telnet) there's no problem from then on. FTP Explorer claims
to connect straight away, but then waits for ages to initiate the d/load.
I'm also trying to find a POP server. Despite what everyone says (I've
seen other discussions about this) about a pop server being on the redhat
distribution, I haven't found it yet - or anything on the red hat site. I
eventually found qpopper v5.2 - but the RPM seems to be incomplete (or it
doesn't match what its documents say). Can anyone give me a *definite*
location/url where I can find it??
Any help appreciated...
Hippy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Behind firewall.. getting out?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:14:37 GMT
I'm behind a proxy and firewall on which only web ports for traffic are
allowed out. I was wondering if there's any sort of application set so
I could use a web browser (and maybe run a JAVA app) to use the web
port to communicate with something on a Linux system which I have on
the outside world to FTP, telnet, or other applications from. So I'd
use my browser (and any JAVA apps it loads.. or I could run some other
program on this system than a browser) to interact thru port 80 with
the other system. Suggestions?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Jacob Smullyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eth0 failure! please help
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:39:16 -0400
I have a similar problem to the one Peter describes -- I have a box with
SuSE 6.1 and a Netgear ethernet card that runs on a modified tulip driver
supplied by Netgear. The driver seems to sit just fine with the kernel
and everyone's happy at boot until the routing is initialized, when I get
the same miserable messages he transcribed. The same driver and card are
on the other box (which runs RH5.2) in my two-box network without this
problem. I thought my routing might be to blame, but I've been over it
repeatedly. Any clues appreciated.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just installed Caldera OpenLinux 2.2. I cannot get my 3c509
> > networkcard working. It worked in RH5.2. The actual driver loads ok
>
> ? how do you know ?
> ( which message at boot-up)
> because normally
>
> when it comes to assign the ip addresses and stuff it says this:
> >
> > SIOCSIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
> > SIOCADDRT: network is down
> > eth0: initialization failed
>
> this seems to tell you that eth0 did NOT load correctly
>
> >
> > how do I fix this? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > -Peter
> >
> >
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: in.ftpd : login failed
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 03:31:17 GMT
Root is normally NOT allowed to FTP for security reasons. I suggest that,
instead of trying to "fix" this, just create and use an user account.
If you really have to have root FTP access (good luck!)... well, I don't do
RedHat, but you might have a look at your /etc/ftpaccess file (if you have
it).
George
===========================================================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
If necessary, however, I can be contacted thru geegs (a) linuxstart DOT com
==========================================================================
peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> I�ve set up wu-ftpd-2.4.2b18 on my redhat5.2 and when login from anywhere
> (localhost or other machine) I get the errormessage login failed, even
> the password is definitely correct.
>
> the entry in inetd:
> ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.ftpd -l
> so I dont have the /etc/ftpaccess enabled.
>
> the syslog-entry does not tell me a lot more:
>
> Jun 14 23:31:55 goldfisch ftpd[15120]: failed login from
> goldfisch.atat.at [192.168.1.1], root
> Jun 14 23:32:00 goldfisch ftpd[15120]: FTP session closed
>
> I also checked /etc/pam.d/ftp, but it seems to be ok right to:
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> auth required /lib/security/pam_listfile.so item=user
> sense=deny file=/etc/ftpusers onerr=succeed
> auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow nullok
> auth required /lib/security/pam_shells.so
> account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
> session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
>
> and the use I tried to logon with (root) is also listed in /etc/ftpusers
>
>
> what the hell is wrong here.
> (tcp/wrapper ist also not the problem, cause I come to the login ...)
>
>
>
> peter
>
> -----------------
> pilsl@
> ANTISPAM
> goldfisch.atat.at
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford Wimbley)
Subject: Re: PPP
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:28:54 GMT
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999 03:15:10 GMT, Nicholas E Couchman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey,
> I have a RH6.0 linux box running PPP 2.3.7. When I try to connect,
>the connection goes through, but after about 1 and 1/2 mins, it
>disconnects. Any ideas?
>--Nick
>
Does /var/log/messages show anything? doesn't pppd explain why it is
going down? Also, many pppd options could cause the link to go down
for various reasons. (lcp-echo-failure, for example)
And the options might be in a file somewhere, unbeknownst to you.
(mine are in /etc/ppp/options)
hope this helps.
regards,
GW
------------------------------
From: "David Means" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What do rc0.d, rc1.d, rc2.d do?
Date: 15 Jun 1999 20:54:48 GMT
Dan Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi
>
> I'm running Redhat Linux 6.0, and I'm trying to get my firewall up
> before the network is brought up.
>
> In my /etc/rc.d directory I have lots of subdirectories named rc0.d,
> rc1.d, rc2.d etc, all containing symlinks.
>
> My question:
>
> Do I simply put a symlink to my firewall script in one of these
> directories? If so which one, and what to call the symlink? Why are
> there so many seemingly identical symlinks in the various rcx.d
> directories?
There is almost surely a link in several of the rc[0-6].d directories
pointing to /etc/rc.d/init.d/network. This is the script that brings up
your
network. One good way to get your firewall rules installed is to put them
into a separate script, and then call that script from within the `start'
section
of the network script.
In mine, the first line (added) of the `start' section reads
echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# this turns off forwarding (in case it was on), so that we can safely
# put the firewall rules in *before* any packets get (mis)handled.
Then, after the code that does
./ifup $i boot,
I have put the actual call to the firewall initialization script:
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/ipfwinit ] ; then
. /etc/sysconfig/ipfwinit
fi
# and then start forwarding
ipv4_forward_set
The advantage of this scheme is that it works automatically when you
start or stop networking, and you don't ever have to think about it
separately when you alter which runlevels have networking operational.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS - strange behavior
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:43:06 GMT
I've got Redhat 6.0. I'm attempting to run DNS using bind 8.2 (shipped
with Redhat). Named appears to be running fine, nslookup works great,
forward & backward lookups work, mx, a, any, etc. all look ok. Syslog
shows no errors when named starts. The only thing that appears
incorrect is when you run nslookup, the server address shows as 0.0.0.0
as opposed to 127.0.0.1 (although a lookup on 127.0.0.1 returns
localhost and a lookup on localhost returns 127.0.0.1). The server
works fine as the DNS for desktops on the lan. The problem I'm having
is that commands run from the server where DNS is running do not appear
to be communicating with named. for instance if i try to ping hostname,
it responds with unknow host, even though nslookup resolves the hostname
fine. The same goes for sendmail (the BIG problem), telnet, ftp,
traceroute. I have gone over all the configuration files and all appear
OK. Anybody have any ideas???
Thanks...
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: WIn 95 printing over SAMBA
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:57:17 GMT
If you use Win95 that has not been patched, there is an error in the
registry.
How to fix it?
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
Ferdinand V. Mendoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was about to jump in jubilation last night when
> my Epson Stylus 600 started printing over Samba
> in my Linux box. Tried to print the apache test page
> of my linux box in my WIn95 client via Netscape.
> It was succesful.
> I tried to increase the resolution and again it
> performed the job as I wanted it to and didn't
> fail. I tried to print from MS word and I started to
> believe this must be it. It was truly wonderful.
> I don't know what have I done when the next time
> I rebooted the WIN 95 and tried to print again,
> Epson 600's spooler panel now complains:
>
> "Failed to open file"
>
> I tried to print from the command line in my linux
> box with say, " $ cal 2000 |lpr " and I can see from
> the Epson spooler that the standard input printing
> has been queued and it sure prints.
> I just can't think of anything wrong with my smb.conf
> file because I was able to print earlier.
> I checked the printer and it seems to be fine.
> Anyone has had similar experience before?
>
> Ferdinand
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Squid does not work :('
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:57:18 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
=======_NextPart_000_0388_01BEB6C9.F8E39A20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
You don't need inetd.conf for squid. There a file called squid.conf in =
your /etc directory. 3128 is default port number and you can change =
them in squid.conf file.
Ollivier Civiol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message =
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,=20
I'm trying to make the Squid proxy work but I can't, I'm not even sure =
that it's running, shouldn't there be a line in inetd.con that starts it =
?=20
Thanks=20
--=20
Best Regards,
Ollivier Civiol
=============================================
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EmailXpress : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB pages : http://www.astecsoft.com/AstecWeb
=20
=======_NextPart_000_0388_01BEB6C9.F8E39A20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>
<DIV>check this site</DIV>
<DIV><A=20
href=3D"http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/">http://home.talkc=
ity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You don't need inetd.conf for squid. There a file called =
squid.conf=20
in your /etc directory. 3128 is default port number and you can =
change=20
them in squid.conf file.</DIV></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>Ollivier Civiol <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:3762E7FB.D4917098@di=
al.oleane.com</A>...</DIV>Hi,=20
<P>I'm trying to make the Squid proxy work but I can't, I'm not even =
sure that=20
it's running, shouldn't there be a line in inetd.con that starts it ?=20
<P>Thanks <PRE>--
Best Regards,
Ollivier Civiol
=============================================
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EmailXpress : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB pages : <A =
href=3D"http://www.astecsoft.com/AstecWeb">http://www.astecsoft.com/Astec=
Web</A></PRE> =20
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
=======_NextPart_000_0388_01BEB6C9.F8E39A20==
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WIN98 and REDHAT5.2
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:57:17 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
John B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Linuxians,
> I am a networking virgin and I need my processor popped.
> I would like to network my Win 98 machine with my Linux machine.
> I have the NIC and Hub. I cant seem to get it going. I am not sure
> how to assign IPs etc ie , gateway, subnet, routing, . I was was
> kinda hoping it was all Plug it in and communicate. I have a modem on
> my win98. Can someone please help me get this thing going?
>
> I would very much appreciate it! Thank You Soooo much in advance!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> reply to <<< jboyce (at) cris DOT com >>>
> Thanks again
>
> http://www.irishthing.com/
>
------------------------------
From: Rafo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Win98 Networking Problems!!
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 18:02:00 -0400
Nick:
Any ideas as to how to test the driver? As you may surmise, the driver was picked
for me by the WIN98 OS (pnp). Is there a way to put the SMC card in loopback? this
could help in isolating the problem. I do not have any experience in
troubleshooting this type of communication problems, any help is welcomed.
Thanks for the rescue attempt!
RA
Nicholas E Couchman wrote:
> It sounds to me like your Win98 end is failing (after all, unless it's a driver,
> there isn't much that can go wrong in Linux, and SMC works in Linux, I have
> one). I would check settings, etc., on the Win9x end.
> --Nick
>
> Rafo wrote:
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > Thanks for the input. Lights at both NIC cards are on (green). However,
> > during the ping attempts I do not observe any TX/RX light activity on either
> > card. The cards are Linux = EtherEZ (SMC), Win98 = AT-2000 PnP Series.
> > (10BaseT).
> >
> > Thanks for the rescue attempt!
> > RA
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm, definately check your NICs, one thing to check is to see if you
> > > are getting link lights. If you are, try updating either the 98 driver
> > > for the NIC. I had problems with my 3com EtherIII and their driver
> > > with IP.
> > >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > Rafo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello:
> > > > I am attempting to network a win98 box with a linux system. All I am
> > > > trying to do, is to run Apache HTTPD on the Linux box and access it
> > > from
> > > > the win98 system so I can test CGI scripts.
> > > >
> > > > I am attempting to connect them using ethernet cards. I have assigned
> > > > the following IP addresses:
> > > > WIN98 IP:192.168.1.110 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > > Linux: IP:192.168.1.100 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > >
> > > > The linux system boots up with out a problem, it detected the ethernet
> > > > hardware ok. I have the hosts file properly structured, netestat
> > > looks
> > > > ok. At the linux box, when I ping for localhost and for 192.168.1.100
> > > > there are no problems, all packet sent are received. However, when I
> > > > ping for the win98 system (192.168.1.110) I get no reply. At the win
> > > 98
> > > > system I can ping both localhost and 192.168.1.110 but I can't ping
> > > the
> > > > linux box. In other words, the systems are not able to talk at all.
> > > I
> > > > have connected them using a crossover (NULL) cable as suggested in the
> > > > Ethernet-HOWTO.
> > > >
> > > > This has to be a simple problem to fix. Please, someone come to the
> > > > rescue!!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > RA
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help!!! I would like to use my linux box as a proxy sever/router
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:57:17 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
Dean Pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi! I use @home cable modem and got one of my linux box
> connected to the net through the cable modem. I have other
> two machines and would like to share the cable modem's
> faster internet acccess.
>
> I think that I can use the first one as a router/proxy server and route
all
> the local requests to it. Anyone have any experience and advise?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dean
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @home connection?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:57:17 GMT
I use Linux with @home service and it works great.
I'm using RH5.2 without DHCP service. I tried DHCP but it didn't work. So
instead of using DHCP, I gathered all the information about my network, and
applied them statically to Linux.
For how to install
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
brooks dobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> has anyone used linux with @home's cable modems? if so any advice?
>
> thanks,
> brooks
>
------------------------------
From: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with Win95 net printer via SMB
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:04:58 -0400
I set up a raw printer and am sharing it out with samba. I can see the
printer in net neighborhood but when I try to print it says that the
printer path is invalid. What is going on?
-Peter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft
Retest News
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Jun 1999 21:58:33 GMT
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999 20:12:52 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan Kegel
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>For news and background about the Mindcraft retest, see
>> http://www.kegel.com/mindcraft_redux.html
>>...
>>plus news about the current retest.
>
>Microsoft has a history of cheating on benchmarks and
>rigging software to prevent competitive products from
>functioning. Could they do that in the Mindcraft retest
>that's now taking place?
If you read the supplied URL above, you'll learn that microsoft doesn't have
to cheat, to give a better performance than linux on an SMP box.
Personally, I'd like to see the results on the same machine, when
linux is swapped out for solaris.
--
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
--------------------------------------------------
The word of the day is mispergitude
------------------------------
From: Frederick Haab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Diamond Supra Express 56i PRO Pci modem
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 20:14:33 GMT
In article <7jqlcl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rui Soutelino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did anyone successively install a Diamond Supra Express 56i PRO Pci
modem?
I have a Diamond SupraExpress 56i (not "PRO"). It is definately not a
winmodem. It is plug-n-play, though, and is probably being given wierd
I/O addresses.
Option 1: I ended up disabling my computer's on-board serial port two so
that the modem would be assigned those values. This only works because
my PC is plug-and-play, and the card is configured correctly on boot up.
Luckily I had a ps/2 mouse, and could live without com2.
Option 2: When I had a 486 I had to boot to DOS, use some pnp
configuration tools that would set my device (sound blaster), and then
use loadlin.exe to load my kernel and boot to linux.
Option 3: Read up on the pnp configuration tools for linux.
Good luck,
Fred
--
---
- Frederick Haab - Turner Studios -
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Chukwuweta Chukwudebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Comtrol RocketPort
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:15:46 -0700
Hi,
This is my first time posting, so forgive me if this is not the
correct
news group for this. I have a brand new spanking Comtrol PCI
Rocketport with 8 I/O ports, (I'm trying to build a pppd dialin
Server).
I installed the hardware, downloaded the drivers from
ftp.comtrol.com and recompiled them as per the instructions,
(make clean; make; make install;) Everything went smoothly.
The machine detects the board during the boot process.
The problem is that after rebooting the machine, I dont see the 8 new
ttyR*
in the /dev directory. Consequently, the attempts to load the driver
fail.
I suspect this is because I am forgetting to configure something,
perhaps with the setrocket program that comes with the install,
but the instructions do not mention this, and my UNIX knowledge
is is not super extensive.
Here are the contents of a cat of the /proc/pci
Bus 0, device 15, function 0:
Communication controller: Comtrol RocketPort 8 Intf (rev 4).
Slow devsel. IRQ 7.
I/O at 0xf4c0.
Here is the error that I get during boot and also when I
try to invoke the driver by hand.
Jun 15 12:44:26 Xa kernel: Rocketport device driver module, version
1.15, 1-Sep-98
Jun 15 12:44:26 Xa kernel: Rocketport controller #0 found at 00:78, -1
AIOP(s) (PCI Rocketport 8)
Jun 15 12:44:26 Xa kernel: No rocketport ports found; unloading driver.
Jun 15 12:44:26 Xa kernel: Rocketport device driver module, version
1.15, 1-Sep-98
Jun 15 12:44:26 Xa kernel: Rocketport controller #0 found at 00:78, -1
AIOP(s) (PCI Rocketport 8)
Jun 15 12:44:26 Xa kernel: No rocketport ports found; unloading driver.
I am running RedHat ver 5.6, Linux 2.0.36
What am I doing wrong?
CSC
------------------------------
From: Darryn Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.questions,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: RSH problem from Linux to Solaris 2.6
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:29:54 -0600
Can you ping REMOTE_HOST?
Darryn Rose
Manager, Technical Services
Mile High Technologies, Inc.
http://www.milehightech.com/mht/Unix.html
Please replace the 'NOSPAM' in my email address with 'milehightech' if you
wish to reply via email.
Carl Robitaille wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> [snip]
>
> When I try to do an "rsh REMOTE_HOST ls", the rsh just sits there
> and does nothing. I tried (it seems) all the possible agnuments of rsh
> specified in the man pages without beeing able to solve my problem.
>
> Another clue is that the reverse connection works. When I run on
> the REMOTE_HOST the command "rsh MY_COMPUTER ls", it works!?!?!?
>
> Any idea is welcomed. Thanks in advance.
>
> Carl
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B'ichela)
Subject: trying to get net up. ethernet
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:09:08 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am reading the net 3 1.3 howto, I have a working dynamic PPP setup to m
my isp. I created the route and ifconfig files in a batch file called
netboot in my ./root directory. file is this
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
# route add default gw 192.168.1.1 eth0
I have that last line commented out as then I cannot use PPP! Ok now the
PPP link is offline for my testing I type on the linux site
ping 192.168.1.3 #this is the XT running ncsa telnet
The result is 100% packet failure!
from NCSA telnet I type
telnet 192.168.1.10
which results in the message gateway or network unreachable.
what other changes to files on the Linux system Must I do to get the
ethernet system at least Cursing at each other while maintaining my dymanic
isp connection via ppp-on (I am running Slackware souped up ver 3.1 (my own
hacked and modified version. original network drivers however)
on the XT right now I have a Kingston KNE-20 network card. it DOES
want to talk to the system as its little lights on the back of the card
light up when trying to negotiate a connection. using the Kingston kne-20
packet driver. the 486 is using a Lantastic Artisoft AE-2/c with jumper w7
set in A setting. I also have a SMC/WD8103EP card as well as a spare
Artisoft AE-2/C card.
Email or posting/email desired as this forum gets to busy and right
now its too hot to go through it all. When I can get my little net up, I
will be able to use it from the XT in the bedroom via telnet, wuuld be a
godsend also for file transfers as then I would not need to move my
bernoulli box from system to system . Both systems are Scsi equipped.
--
A pearl of wisdom from the y2K newsgroups:
=========================================================================
Y2K appears to be the Baby Boomers mid-life crisis, and it has the
potential to be a dandy.
-- Anonymnous --
==========================================================================
B'ichela
------------------------------
From: "thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SV: SAMBA newbie
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:10:17 GMT
> This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
> for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
> http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
>
> g'Luk
Thanks, that helped me a lot. Now the Samba is running and I can see the
Linux box from my Win95 client but i can't open the shared folder. I must
have something wrong when it comes to the user and password stuff. Do I need
to have specified passwords for Samba or can it use the same from Linux?
/thomas
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************