Linux-Networking Digest #566, Volume #11 Thu, 17 Jun 99 08:13:45 EDT
Contents:
Re: dns server reponses late (David Crooke)
INN and UUCP Feed (Wartan Hachaturow)
Re: IRC ("Jan Johansson")
Re: Bandwidth priority? (mei)
Re: help: ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available error (M. Buchenrieder)
Sendmail and M4 (Andreas Bartel)
linux & nfs (Gerald Weber)
SMB samba shares not being seen by everyone???? (Robert Chapman Jr.)
Re: Linux server, Win95 clients, 1 modem, PPP...a la LanBridge? (CodeWright)
Re: S.A.T.A.N. (Brueckner)
Re: ip_masq_icq for kernel 2.0.36 ("George Georgakis")
Re: linux to win98 network (CodeWright)
Re: PCI Eth Card w/ IRQ=5? (Santiago de Pablo)
Rejecting PAP requests, and don't know why (David Powell)
Slirp and pppd . ("serg")
SOLVED: Re: Linux box on NT network: Network Name? Visibility from other hosts?
("Stephan Beal")
Re: cable modem or ASDL (Doug Bryant)
Re: NIS, YP problem. (Brueckner)
Re: raid problem (Jack Snodgrass)
Re: Can't ping anything. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: connecting to efortress (Eric Polacek)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Crooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dns server reponses late
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 09:25:45 GMT
DNS config on you Windoze (I assume, given IE) boxes is wrong
To issue denials, set your server up with authority (SOA) for .
------------------------------
From: Wartan Hachaturow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: INN and UUCP Feed
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:58:42 +0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Everybody!
Can anyone tell me, how do I organize
restricted newsgroups access from UUCP feeds
( Well... Fido Feeds. Smth like a feed
p2.f938.n5030.z2 shouldn't have a right to post
to a newsgroup fido7.smth...)
Since I don't know from which user does posting
done ( It's not NNTP, isn't it?), I can't use
nnrp.access
--
An American is a man with two arms and four wheels. -- A Chinese child
-==-
Regards,Wartan.
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IRC
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:59:42 +0200
Sjoerd Venema wrote in message <7ka8im$k06$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi, I installed SuSE 6.1 and updated the kernel modules. I want to use MIRC
>from a workstation trough the Linux box. Masquerading is on. Masq_irc is on
>also but MIRC can't "resolve hostname". What am I doing wrong or forget??
Does the client have a valid DNS set?
(or if this is the local machine name) does it have a hostname set in DNS
properties?
------------------------------
From: mei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Bandwidth priority?
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:06:56 +0200
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
>
> In Linux, is there anyway to give "priority" to certain bandwidth
> streams? For example, on my system I have a RealAudio server that
> sometimes has its streams interrupted if one person happens to be
> FTPing at that time on my measly 128k ISDN line. I would like to give
> priority to RealAudio, and less priority to FTP. Is that possible?
If I remember well the answer is yes. Try to see in the kernel sources. I'm not
sure but it'd be qonos or something like this.
Ciao Mei
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: help: ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available error
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 06:03:52 GMT
Ken Kwasnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi All,
>I've just installed SuSE 6.1, and I'm trying to configure the box as a
>firewall. Although I've tried to enable all IP firewalling/masquerading
>options in the kernel I keep getting the following error when I do even
>a simple command like "ipfwadm -I -f":
>ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available
[...]
That's one of the changes in the 2.2.* kernels. Use IP chains instead.
See /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes .
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: Andreas Bartel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sendmail and M4
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:18:31 +0200
I habe some trouble with sendmail (8.8.x) from SuSE 6.0 and the
M4-Scripts.
To prevent Spamming I habe configured:
use-names -> /etc/mail/LocalNames
there the local Domains (who ist allowed do relay) registered:
localhost
abc.de
def.com
and
use-relayto -> /etc/mail/RelayTo
and also
chk-rcpt4
is activated in "SuSEconfig.sendmail".
The machine DOES not relay ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHYYYY??
Andreas
------------------------------
From: Gerald Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux & nfs
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:22:58 +0200
hi there,
anyone know how to tune nfs on linux?
i've tried to copy a 128mb-file over nfs and it took over 6min to finish.
sh** performance i think.
i also tried to set rsize and wsize to 4096 and 8192 but no change.
any ideas?
thanks for help
ps: kernel 2.2.5
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Chapman Jr.)
Subject: SMB samba shares not being seen by everyone????
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 09:25:27 GMT
Hi all... I have a network with a RH Linux 6.0 server, and is running samba
with several shares setup. The problem that I'm having is that some of the
users on the same subnet can not see the shares or the server at all.
Several of the newer computers that I have setup all can see it just fine..
Anyone know if maybe the drivers of the individual computer might be a
problem. Most of the NIC's are 3Com and most are running Win95 osr2. Have the
NIC drivers changed recently????
Thanks in advance...
Robert Chapman
------------------------------
From: CodeWright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux server, Win95 clients, 1 modem, PPP...a la LanBridge?
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:52:13 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm going to be converting a peer-to-peer network of Win95 machines to one with
> a server running linux. Ideally, this conversion to a linux server will be
> mostly transparent to the users of the Win95 clients.
>
> The main function of the network at this point is to allow all the Win95
> workstations Internet connectivity via a modem installed in one of the machines
> (this machine is the one marked for Linux installation); they use a product
> called LanBridge marketed by LinkSys which works as follows. When any
> workstation tries to access something outside of the LAN, it makes the
> modem-computer dial up (if its PPP connection isn't already active) and uses the
> resulting PPP connection for network access. The question is whether and how
> this could be accomplished if the computer with the modem was running linux, and
> the computers connecting to it were either Win95 or Linux (in this case, there's
> 6 Win95 workstations and 1 Linux workstation). In other words, what I need is a
> way to allow several Win95 workstations to use a single PPP connection running
> on a Linux machine, possibly simultaneously. Anyone done this or know the
> methods involved? I appreciate any feedback.
>
> -- Jeeves
On the linux machine...
1) Configure it as a router (rather than as a host)
2) Compile in the NAT/Firewall support
3) Enable the Dial-on-demand support
4) Install your firewall and NAT rules
5) Enjoy. You're linux box will automatically connect to the internet
when any machine needs the connection, *and* it will provide NAT
translation, so you don't have to lease 'real' IP addresses for each
machine, *and* it'll keep attackers out, *and* it won't cost you a
cent.
--
Lew Pitcher
Master Codewright and JOAT-in-training
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brueckner)
Subject: Re: S.A.T.A.N.
Date: 17 Jun 1999 11:18:40 GMT
Frank Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi all!
: I am trying to get satan up and running, and I think I need some help :D
:
: When I start satan I get the main html page in netscape,
: but, when I click on "Satan Target Selection" It asks me to save the
: file.
: I think that this is a Netscape issue, but I'm not sure, because
: I had some trouble compiling the items in the "src/boot/" dir.
: (I'm not sure if this has anything to do with it, or if it's just a
: setting
: in netscape that needs to be made....
:
: Any help would be appreciated.
:
: thanks!
:
: -Frank
:
that is because satan returns .pl pages which should rather be html pages.
you only need to tell netscape to display .pl pages as html pages somewhere
in netscape configuration
cya
Holger
--
_/\/\/\/\/\____________________________/\/\___________________
_/\/\____/\/\__/\/\/\______/\/\__/\/\__/\/\__/\/\____/\/\/\/\_
_/\/\____/\/\______/\/\____/\/\/\/\____/\/\/\/\____/\/\/\/\___
_/\/\____/\/\__/\/\/\/\____/\/\________/\/\/\/\__________/\/\_
_/\/\/\/\/\____/\/\/\/\/\__/\/\________/\/\__/\/\__/\/\/\/\___
______________________________________________________________
http://www.fet.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ip_masq_icq for kernel 2.0.36
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:48:41 GMT
Sorry, missed that last comment.
Well, not only can I send messages, URLs and files to outside users (I
don't have voice messaging), I can even do that to ANOTHER user behind my
own server (ie. on this LAN). I have even used the chat function to include
two local LAN users and 3 "outsiders".
Occasionally, when I try to message another outside user who is ALSO behind
a firewall, I get the "Send through server" message. But that's about it.
So what gives?
George
===========================================================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
If necessary, however, I can be contacted thru geegs (a) linuxstart DOT com
==========================================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article <7ka3od$tbe$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> That's right.. people outside seems not able to contact you behind the
> masqueraded network. Your ICQ keep listen to the port 4000, and the
> gateway got the incoming calls, but didn't forward to the appropiate
> clients. Therefore people can only send you mail thru' server most of
> the time, it's also impossible to send you files, initiate voice chat to
> you. Correct me if I was wrong.
>
> But the ICQ modules know an ICQ login request is not a normal request. I
> record the port that the client will listen to, listen that port for them
> forward the packets to the client also. It also did some hacks in file
> request and voice chat as far as I know. So I think it's necessary for
> a gateway masquerading ICQ.
>
> You may also do this using SOCKS5 server from www.socks.nec.com, but the
> SOCKS support code in ICQ seems broken. So I used to use SockCap32 in the
> client side also. But now I no longer need them, I got the ICQ masq
> modules and I am happy with it. :)
>
> -Wilson
>
> Bert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <01beb63f$cf0a34a0$0101a8c0@george>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >> If ICQ is supposed to need a masq module, then why does it work
perfectly
> >> through my 2.0.32 gateway without one?
> >>
> >> George
>
> > Try to send file to user, accept a voice message or even send a message
> > (from the outside world) to yourself...
>
------------------------------
From: CodeWright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux to win98 network
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:48:11 -0400
jim conti wrote:
>
> i need help setting up my linux network configuration. i want the linux box
> (client) to be able to share the dial-up access of the win98 box(server). i
> think i have to edit tons of stuff in netconf, but i'm not sure exactly what
> to do.
Are you *sure* you want the Linux box to go through the Win98 box to the
internet?
Of the two, Linux is better suited as the internet host, having native
support for
NAT, firewalling, and *all* the network tools necessary. Besides, you'll
have to reboot
the Win98 system far oftener than the Linux system, and is inherently
less secure than
Linux... ;-)
--
Lew Pitcher
Master Codewright and JOAT-in-training
------------------------------
From: Santiago de Pablo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: PCI Eth Card w/ IRQ=5?
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:25:39 +0200
John Hovell escribió:
>
> I am having problems finding an ethernet card that will work in my
> machine since so many of today's cards are PNP and you can't change the
> IRQ.
>
> Bottom line: The only IRQ I have left availible in my system is IRQ 5.
> Does anyone know a PCI Ethernet card that can use (or be configured to
> use) IRQ 5? I have tried the Linksys and Intel to no avail.
>
> Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
>
> TIA,
> John Hovell
Currently PCI Cards can *share* the same IRQ, using masks.
My RH 5.2 use Ethernet and Video with the same IRQ 12.
Luck, Santiago.
------------------------------
From: David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Rejecting PAP requests, and don't know why
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:21:13 GMT
I am trying to switch from Windows 95 to Linux, and having some problems
getting it to authenticate with my ISP (Earthlink). Linux wants to
reject PAP requests for some reason. The first time I tried this, it
worked fine, and I was able to log in and run an FTP session, but
haven't been able to get authenticated since. My /etc/ppp/pap-secrets
file is OK as far as I can tell, and set to root/root 600.
What else can cause this? A sample run is below:
========================================================================
======
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb82ab430> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x5fe0ac45> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x5fe0ac45> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x5fe0ac45> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap>
<pcomp> <accomp> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5d 16 bf>]
sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x5fe0ac45> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
========================================================================
======
depowell at Earthlink dot net
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "serg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slirp and pppd .
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:34:24 +0200
Hello ,
I'm trying to connect suse 6.1 linux to internet using
slirp on the ISP side and kppp on linux side.
There is no problem with modem and login script, but after
logging in and running slirp, the pppd cann't establish connection with
slirp.
Does anybody know which additional options should be passed to pppd ?
( slirp works fine with NT )
Thank you.
Serg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Stephan Beal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SOLVED: Re: Linux box on NT network: Network Name? Visibility from other
hosts?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:44:27 +0200
Just to let those of you who are curious know, I solved the problem
described below.
/etc/smb.conf requires an IP address in the "interfaces" field, and then the
machine is visible in the Network Neighborhood. I'm given a dynamic IP at
startup, so I can't hard-code this in there. I now launch a small script
that gets my IP address and updates that file whenever the smb service is
started (/sbin/init.d/smb in SuSE). If someone wants a copy of the script,
just send me a mail.
===== Stephan Beal
Stephan Beal wrote in message <7jlod6$qd1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a Linux (Suse 6.0 w/ many updates, if it matters, running kernel
>2.2.latest) machine on a very large (50k users?) NT network. I use DHCP to
>get an IP address at bootup.
>I can ping machines by name (in the same domain, anyway) and IP (all across
>the WAN), but I cannot ping my Linux machine by name. I can ping it by IP,
>though. I can't see the Linux machine in the Network Neighborhood, etc.
>I've played around with many options in /etc/dhclient.conf, but dhclient
>fails to get an IP if I make any substantial changes to the default (and it
>always says that the "option" lines don't follow the correct format, even
>when pasted in directly from the dhcp-options man page).
>
>Can someone please tell me how I can get my Linux machine seen via it's
>NetBIOS name from WinXX hosts? I suspect that it has something to do with
>dhclient.conf, but I have yet to figure it out. I believe I have all
>required protocols, etc. smbclient can see the WInXX hosts, for example.
>
>Help?
>
>--
>----- Stephan Beal
>The opinions expressed in this post may
>not reflect those of my employer, my girlfriend,
>God, or even myself.
>It takes you less time to delete junk mail than it
>does for me to remove NOSPAM from your address,
>so I will generally not accomodate "remove NOSPAM
>from my address to mail me" requests.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Doug Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cable modem or ASDL
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 07:45:39 -0500
Thanks for the advice. it looks like cable is unreliable.
later, doug
Doug Bryant wrote:
> hello,
>
> I am fortunate enough to be moving into an area that provides both cable
> modem and ASDL access.
>
> Could anyone give advice about which is better/more reliable The cable
> modem access would be through @Home and the ASDL would be through
> Bellsouth.net.
>
> What I am looking for is speed and ability to access my linux box from
> work or on trips. I am able to do this now by emailing my IP# to my
> work email address over a dial up account.
>
> Is a similar senario possible with one or the other.
>
> I am not expecting either company to jump at the chance to support linux
> so that is not really an issue. I have heard Bellsouth ASDL is
> anti-linux going so far as to not provide access to linux boxes even if
> you set it up yourself. (see slashdot.org and do a search on Bellsouth)
>
> Thanks for any pointers
>
> Doug Bryant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brueckner)
Subject: Re: NIS, YP problem.
Date: 17 Jun 1999 11:15:06 GMT
Grant Schoep ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: > > $ ypcat hosts
: > > YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound
: > > No such map hosts.byaddr. Reaseon: Can't bind to server which serves
well i'm not sure how suse does this, although i'm using it myself, but i wrote my
own skripts for nis. it looks like you didn't configure your ypbind correctly.
maybe it helps if you create a file /etc/yp.conf and add a line like
domain <yourdomain> server <yourserver>
at least this works for ypbind-mt from http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/linux/nis.html
cya
Holger
--
_/\/\/\/\/\____________________________/\/\___________________
_/\/\____/\/\__/\/\/\______/\/\__/\/\__/\/\__/\/\____/\/\/\/\_
_/\/\____/\/\______/\/\____/\/\/\/\____/\/\/\/\____/\/\/\/\___
_/\/\____/\/\__/\/\/\/\____/\/\________/\/\/\/\__________/\/\_
_/\/\/\/\/\____/\/\/\/\/\__/\/\________/\/\__/\/\__/\/\/\/\___
______________________________________________________________
http://www.fet.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Snodgrass)
Subject: Re: raid problem
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 06:18:10 -0500
[This followup was posted to comp.os.linux.networking and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]
In article <7kacvk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> raid cannot start up automatically at boot time. however, i can start it by
> typing raidstart /dev/md0 after boot time. why?! i have followed the
> instruction of the software raid how to, e.g,
> 1. acitivate autodetection in kernel
> 2. raid device created with persistent-superblock
> 3. set partition type to fd
>
> pls help!!!
>
> /etc/raidtab
>
> raiddev /dev/md0
> raid-level 0
> nr-raid-disks 2
> persistent-superblock 1
> chunk-size 4
> device /dev/sda2
> raid-disk 0
> device /dev/sdb3
> raid-disk 1
>
> dmesg
>
> Linux version 2.2.5-15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
> egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #1 Mon Apr 19 22:21:09 EDT
> 1999
> Detected 267278174 Hz processor.
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> Calibrating delay loop... 532.48 BogoMIPS
> Memory: 192600k/196608k available (996k kernel code, 412k reserved, 2216k
> data, 60k init)
> VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.4.0 initialized
> CPU: AMD AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions stepping 00
> Checking 386/387 coupling... OK, FPU using exception 16 error reporting.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
> PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb290
> PCI: Using configuration type 1
> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
> PCI: 00:38 [1106/0586]: Work around ISA DMA hangs (00)
> Activating ISA DMA hang workarounds.
> Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2
> Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
> NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
> Initializing RT netlink socket
> Starting kswapd v 1.5
> Detected PS/2 Mouse Port.
> Serial driver version 4.27 with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ enabled
are you running with the Software Raid stuff that came with RedHat 6.0? I
think that the stuff with RedHat 6.0 was not all there. You've go to
go to the kernel.org site and get the latest software raid tools from
there before it will work. I had to get the latest software raid tools
set up before RedHat 6.0 would recognize my Raid-0 and Raid-1 arrays.
jack - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cybermail.net
ICQ# 27979473 <img src="http://logos.cybermail.net/cybercool.gif">
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can't ping anything.
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:57:11 GMT
In article <7k9iqd$5fd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've got problems trying to get my network card working under linux.
> I can't ping anything except my own host.
so ping 127.0.0.1
ping localhost
ping (your machine name here)
they all work?
( snip)
> All this seem OK to me. Any Ideas?
>
looks ok to me as well-
maybe hardware cable etc?
have you tried tcpdump to monitor your ip-traffic, maybe find out what
is working or not - can you see packets from other machines?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Eric Polacek <"epola"@[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: connecting to efortress
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 07:54:40 -0400
Sorry for the waste of bandwidth, IRQ setting wrong, all fived, thanks
anyway.
""epola"@[EMAIL PROTECTED]"" wrote:
> I am able to call my isp (efortress) and get a login prompt but if I
> enter my user name and password it says:
> entering ppp
> ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> mtu 1500.
> I then leave minicom w/out resetting and start pppd but it does not
> connect.
> There is none of the ppp garbage scrolling on the screen as should be
> expected.
> When I connect w/ windows it runs this program at the login prompt:
> proc main
> transmit "^M"
> waitfor "/usr/local/etc/ns-",matchcase until 30
> endproc
> Can anyone translate this into a linux script or if someone has
> connected to this isp and can send me their config files I would be much
> appreciative.
> Thaks in advaance.
> E.
>
> --
> http://wwp.icq.com/27266851 (go there and try it!) or,
> * Send me E-mail Express directly to my computer screen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * You may visit my Personal ICQ Homepage:
> http://members.icq.com/27266851
> For downloading ICQ at http://www.icq.com/
> For adding similar signatures to your e-mail go to:
> http://www.icq.com/emailsig.html
--
http://wwp.icq.com/27266851 (go there and try it!) or,
* Send me E-mail Express directly to my computer screen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* You may visit my Personal ICQ Homepage: http://members.icq.com/27266851
For downloading ICQ at http://www.icq.com/
For adding similar signatures to your e-mail go to:
http://www.icq.com/emailsig.html
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
