Linux-Networking Digest #585, Volume #11 Fri, 18 Jun 99 22:13:44 EDT
Contents:
Re: Hi, I just installed RH 6.0....now what ??? (John Hovell)
Wyse Terminals on Linux Network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Netscape problem w/Apache ("Brent Davies")
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest
News (Jason O'Rourke)
Eth0 is active, but can't see other host! (Darren F.)
Re: Netscape problem w/Apache (John Hovell)
Re: BNC cable length limit (jerzy Kaltenberg)
Re: Weird Scenario (hudini)
Samba file caching problem (XuYifeng)
Re: Netscape problem w/Apache ("Brent Davies")
Re: Compaq Deskpro (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Weird Scenario (no spammindspringDOTcom (Mr. Bastard))
Re: 3Com Ethernet Card (Gregory Conron)
Re: What do these ident messages mean? ("David Means")
Re: Help with identd and irc. ("David Means")
PPP problems (newbie)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest
News ("Stuart Fox")
please help with samba ("Jorge Canelhas")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Hi, I just installed RH 6.0....now what ???
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 23:29:48 GMT
Newbie --
newbie wrote:
> I want to use my linux box for a proxy/ip masq/modem bonding/etc.
>
You will want to look at ipchains. The stock RH 6.0 supports it (i.e.
no kernel recompile required). Look at this part of the IP Masquerade
Mini-HOWTO:
http://metalab.unc.edu/linux/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade-3.html#ss3.4
Its all that really concerns you at this point.
>
> To help get me started can you answer some questions:
>
> 1) what should I use ?
>
> Gnome ?
> KDE ?
> X86Free ?
> Are there any bugs in any of the above ?
>
XFree86 is an implementation of XWindows for Intel processors. If you
installed Gnome or KDE as they came from the RH CD, they work great,
IMHO.
>
> 2) I've heard of problems with Gnome's ppp, what are they ?
>
I think it is KDE's ppp that has confused people. Maybe Gnome has one
too. I just use Network COnfigurator from the control-panel. It works
pretty well.
>
> 3)The machine boots into Gnome, can that be changed ? How ?
>
Yes. init 3 at the prompt (as root).
>
> 4) Can I set up my ip masq, etc in X, or do I need to edit files
> manually ?
>
You probably need to edit /etc/rc.d/rc.local and add two lines at the
end (explained in the above mini HOWTO link.
>
> Thank you for helping a newbie
>
No problem.
Hope this helps,
John
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wyse Terminals on Linux Network
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 22:51:40 GMT
I have a small LAN at home witht he primary file server running Windows
NT, 4 client W98 machines and 2 linux servers, one running RH 5.1 the
other i've just installed RH 6.0. I have a WYSE 150 terminal laying
around that i'd like to get hooked up. My question is, do I need to be
running some type of terminal server software on one of the linux
machines?? and if so if i could get a location, or at least a name to
get me headed in the right direction. Also another question. Right now
my NT box is running Proxy 2.0. I'd like to use Linux as my proxy
server. I've heard alot of talk about IP Masquerade, but haven't been
able to actually locate the source. Can anyone point me in the right
direction. I"ve heard 6.0 comes with it, but i can't seem to find it.
Thanks in advance
Jeff
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Brent Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Netscape problem w/Apache
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:03:07 GMT
> are HoTMetaL and Internet Explorer now
> available for linux or . . . Not that I
> would use the latter but I might consider the former.
Well, I'm not sure if they are available. I am using a Windows box to
create
the web site with HotMetal Pro. I don't know if a WYSIWYG editor in Linux.
As for Internet Explorer, I don't know if there is one for Linux, but there
is one
for Solaris. I use Netscape on Linux, but this web site (like most out
there)
will be accessed from Windows machines, as well as UNIX-based
machines. I need to make sure it works for all systems and browsers.
> why do you post to so many Linux groups?
Because I believe my problem is with Linux/Apache. I'm SURE that it's my
fault, but the Linux groups are where I will find my answers.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason O'Rourke)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft
Retest News
Date: 18 Jun 1999 17:03:33 -0700
Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You seem to be taking a rather sinister view of all this. Do you think that
>it might be possible that MS programmers are just lazy? Maybe they just
>didn't remove it because they didn't get around to it. Maybe it wasn't a
>high priority.
I guess you had never heard the joke- 'Dos isn't done until Lotus doesn't
run.' (Lotus might not view that as a joke, but I don't think the
statement was proven).
MS has a history of releasing new versions of dos and windows that breaks
the current release of their main competitors. It was especially bad with
the release of 3.1.
>It isn't MS's problem if someone exploits the tools provided in an Office
>app. However it might be if a product didn't work as advertised - win 3.1
>on DR-DOS for instance.
>Does this mean that if I wrote a virus in VB that MS would be responsible?
In my mind, yes. They created a 'feature' that has brought IS departments
using Office to their knees. This started with the tame but annoying word
macro virus and has now gotten quite dangerous.
>>and the knowledge
>> that anyone could exploit IIS with a single line of code.
>Are you suggesting that *nix has no bugs? Or requires no patches to get
>running securely? ALL operating systems have bugs that must be patched, I
>don't care if it's linux, NT, Solaris etc. And why has no-one found this
>bug until now - IIS 4.0 has been out for quite a while now...
Unix certainly has had its troubles, especially with sendmail. But at
this point, most of the issues have been resolved. Open source code and
20 years of release time have been helpful. Meanwhile, Windows and NT
have been used for networking for but a few years and it's pretty clear
that this is going to continue for quite some time. MS won't get sued
over it, they'll make a killing selling fixes instead. Or perhaps people
will start to realize the costs and move on.
--
Jason O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jor.com
'96 BMW r850R
last dive: June 13th, Pescadero Wash Rocks (Carmel), 46 mins at 64ft max
------------------------------
From: Darren F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Eth0 is active, but can't see other host!
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 23:25:05 GMT
Hi,
I have a situation which I haven't been able to find in the
newsgroups listings, so if this is a repeat, please excuse.
I have two computers with generic (cheap) networking cards in them.
One is my primary machine running Win95, and the other I am trying to
configure as a Linux server. I am using a "cross" cable to link allow
the computers to talk, which works great with my primary Win95 machine
and any other Win95 machine.
However, when I connect my Linux machine to my Win95 machine, they do
not see each other via PING.
I suspect my eth0 configuration on the Linux machine is bad, because
I've had one heck of a time getting it to recognize the card. The card
is NE2000 compatible, and at least appears to be working.
I have assigned eth0 the ip address of 10.1.1.100(255.0.0.0), and can
ping that address from a linux prompt.
My Win95 machine has an ip of 10.1.1.1(255.0.0.0).
Ping times out when I try to ping from either machine. When I try to
traceroute from the Linux machine, I immediately get back:
traceroute to 10.1.1.1 (10.1.1.1), 30 hops max, 40 bytes packets
1 host (10.1.1.100) 0.414 ms !H 0.315 ms !H 0.275 ms !H
My Linux routing table looks like:
DEST GATEWAY GENMASK FLAGS METRIC REF USE IFACE
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 4 lo
10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5 eth0
default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 14 eth0
I accidently removed the original "default" route, but it didn't work
anyway.
If anyone has any ideas, I would sure appreciate hearing them.
Thanks alot, in advance!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Netscape problem w/Apache
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:20:20 GMT
Brent --
Brent Davies wrote:
> I have restarted the httpd service every time that I change anything. Just
> to be safe, I did it again after receiving your posting. No good.
>
> The DirectoryIndex line in srm.conf has a list of files to look for. The
> order is:
>
> index.htm
> index.html
> index.shtml
> index.cgi
>
hmm... doesn't this just cover index files? I don't know what version of Apache
you are running but, (I'm running 1.3.6)
I would most likely add a line to srm.conf:
# Added by you, put this here so you know where it came from (date)
AddType text/html .htm
This should definitely work.
Feel free to e-mail me if its still not working.
-John
>
> That's it. If you can remember what you did to fix this, please let me
> know.
>
> Thanks,
> Brent
> John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You were right about the .htm being the problem. Have you restarted the
> web
> > server since you changed httpd.conf? I had this same problem. I forget
> if
> > there were additional steps I needed to make in order to fix this.
> >
> > Good luck
> > -John
> >
> > Brent Davies wrote:
> >
> > > I am using RH 5.1 and Apache for my web site. I developed the website
> with
> > > Hot Metal Pro. The problem is with Netscape Navigator. When I address
> the
> > > URL I get the main page the way I should. From that point forward, no
> > > matter how many links I click on, only the raw HTML code is displayed in
> the
> > > Netscape browser. Internet Explorer works perfectly.
> > >
> > > I thought it might be the fact that all of my web pages use the
> extension
> > > .htm instead .html, but I made sure that the .htm extension is in the
> search
> > > order in httpd.conf.
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen this behavior before? Any help will be greatly
> appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Brent
> >
------------------------------
From: jerzy Kaltenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BNC cable length limit
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:19:21 GMT
thin ethernet - 185 meters, 30 stations
BNC sucks as chice of medium, everytime you move your computer a bit you may
have to recrimp connections.
Manohar Singh wrote:
> hey hey fellas!
>
> What is the maximum length a BNC cable can be used safely in a peer to peer
> limit?
>
> would appreciate an answer very much ....
> thankooo ;-)
------------------------------
From: hudini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Weird Scenario
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 19:32:22 -0500
"no spam Mr. Bastard" wrote:
>
> I am running RH 6.0 and trying to connect to the internet
> through a 95 or 98 box. Any ideas ?
95 or 98 box? Arer you referring to winshit 95 or 98? Those things
are not boxes... They are pieces of shit.
Box is a cool term only for the UNIX family of OSes. In other words for
real operating systems.
--
DOn't use winshit... because a computer is a beautiful thing to waste!
------------------------------
From: XuYifeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Samba file caching problem
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 08:31:54 +0800
Hi,
I am using RedHat 6.0, I found a annoying samba problem:
in samba faq, I found a problem that Windows machine can not see
changes
on linux samba file, but I have an opposite problem: samba client can
not see
changes on files in NT box:
- use smbmount mounts NT directroy on Linux box.
- create a file on a NT box
- view the file on a Linux box
- change the file on the NT box
- look at the file again on the Linux via Samba and the changes are not
visible
did anyone encounter this problem and how to resolve the problem?
Any help will be apprecicated,
---
XuYifeng
------------------------------
From: "Brent Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Netscape problem w/Apache
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:42:45 GMT
There is one more thing, but I'm not sure if it is important.
I am using the VirtualHost directive in httpd.conf. It seems
that all of the web sites on the server are not happy with
Netscape, or vice-versa.
All suggestions are welcome!
Thanks,
Brent
John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Brent --
>
> Brent Davies wrote:
>
> > I have restarted the httpd service every time that I change anything.
Just
> > to be safe, I did it again after receiving your posting. No good.
> >
> > The DirectoryIndex line in srm.conf has a list of files to look for.
The
> > order is:
> >
> > index.htm
> > index.html
> > index.shtml
> > index.cgi
> >
>
> hmm... doesn't this just cover index files? I don't know what version of
Apache
> you are running but, (I'm running 1.3.6)
>
> I would most likely add a line to srm.conf:
> # Added by you, put this here so you know where it came from (date)
> AddType text/html .htm
>
> This should definitely work.
>
> Feel free to e-mail me if its still not working.
>
> -John
>
>
> >
> > That's it. If you can remember what you did to fix this, please let me
> > know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brent
> > John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > You were right about the .htm being the problem. Have you restarted
the
> > web
> > > server since you changed httpd.conf? I had this same problem. I
forget
> > if
> > > there were additional steps I needed to make in order to fix this.
> > >
> > > Good luck
> > > -John
> > >
> > > Brent Davies wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am using RH 5.1 and Apache for my web site. I developed the
website
> > with
> > > > Hot Metal Pro. The problem is with Netscape Navigator. When I
address
> > the
> > > > URL I get the main page the way I should. From that point forward,
no
> > > > matter how many links I click on, only the raw HTML code is
displayed in
> > the
> > > > Netscape browser. Internet Explorer works perfectly.
> > > >
> > > > I thought it might be the fact that all of my web pages use the
> > extension
> > > > .htm instead .html, but I made sure that the .htm extension is in
the
> > search
> > > > order in httpd.conf.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone seen this behavior before? Any help will be greatly
> > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Brent
> > >
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Compaq Deskpro
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 20:20:06 +0200
In article <7kbt1b$ja$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am trying to install Red Hat Linux, version 5.2, on a Compaq Deskpro
>computer in a dual boot mode with Windows NT. This was done exactly the
>way the instruction manual says to. The basic install seems to have
>worked. I can enter both NT and Linux, and do simple things like edit
>text. However, there are several serious problems, mostly related to the
>network.
What kind of 'Compaq Deskpro'? An XL? (with onboard SCSI)
If so: http://www-c724.uibk.ac.at/XL/
(I've got at Compaq Deskpro XL 560. Not tried it with linux. I'm
told a upgrade to the 2.2.5 kernel dont need the 'movepci'
ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/softpaq/Drivers/sp1599.exe and so on.
So maybe a distribution with 2.2.* kernel is better.)
>I have tried moving the SCSI and ethernet cards to different slots, but
>that did not change anything.
'the SCSI' hmm not the onboard?
As I dont know what model you use, i dont know what a F10 during
startup gives. Just moving cards without setting the 'ondisk "bios"'
on the Compaq Deskpro XL 560 I'v got, I will not do that..
>Any idea on either problem?
Compaq Deskpro is not impossible. But i would have tried another
machine if i had one.. first..
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: bastardAT(no spam)mindspringDOTcom (Mr. Bastard)
Subject: Re: Weird Scenario
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:58:28 GMT
Reply-To: bastardAT(no spam)mindspringDOTcom
Thank you for those wonderful words of wisdom. That was incredible.
Now if anyone else could tell me how to make this possible it would be
appreciated.
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 19:32:22 -0500, hudini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"no spam Mr. Bastard" wrote:
>>
>> I am running RH 6.0 and trying to connect to the internet
>> through a 95 or 98 box. Any ideas ?
>
>95 or 98 box? Arer you referring to winshit 95 or 98? Those things
>are not boxes... They are pieces of shit.
>
>Box is a cool term only for the UNIX family of OSes. In other words for
>real operating systems.
------------------------------
From: Gregory Conron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3Com Ethernet Card
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 22:04:24 -0300
Hi John,
You're correct. I'm running SuSE 6.1 with Kernel 2.2.10. There is indeed
support for the card there. However, I'll be damned if I can get the network
running. Using Yast I can config the card, but within the network section
DHCP is disabled. Andara (my cable modem supplier) runs a DHCP server. I
also have an error the eth0eth0 (yep, there twice in the error message) is
unsupported by this card. I've checked rc.config and there is only on eth0
entry within it. I'm doing something wrong, I just don't quite know what.
Cheers,
Greg Conron
John Hovell wrote:
> What kernel version are you booting? I think everything north of 2.0.x
> has support for this card (maybe even earlier).
>
> say yes to CONFIG_VORTEX under CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_3COM
> If you use menuconfig, this is 3c90x support (Vortex/Boomerang).
>
> I am running 2.2.5-22 and have 3 3c905b's all running quite happily.
>
> Good luck
> Write back if you need more specifics.
>
> -John
------------------------------
From: "David Means" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What do these ident messages mean?
Date: 19 Jun 1999 01:03:58 GMT
Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I get a lot of messages like these in /var/log/messages:
>
> Jun 17 09:52:36 corona identd[1725]: Connection from
service.boulder.ibm.com
> Jun 17 09:52:36 corona identd[1725]: from: 198.17.57.66
service.boulder.ibm.cm ) for: 62235, 21
> Jun 17 09:52:36 corona identd[1725]: Returned: 62235 , 21 : NO-USER
> [snip]
Me, too. Apparently what happens is that the remote end is attempting
to authenticate your user further. But according to the governing RFCs, no
one is supposed to accept the data from such a query-response pair as
gospel,
so this is actually idle chit-chat between the remote server and your
machine;
the returned info identifies the user (on your machine) of the TCP socket.
Most
of us have this configured so that no useful info is given out. So, to make
a
long story short, ignore the messages until you get so tired of them that
you
figure out how to configure syslog to put them somewhere else (like
/dev/null).
I haven't taken the time, myself.
------------------------------
From: "David Means" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with identd and irc.
Date: 19 Jun 1999 01:11:50 GMT
Walter Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Old, old topic, but an hour of browsing on Deja didn't seem to produce a
> solution to my problem.
>
> I'm trying to run xchat (or ircii, or..) on my Linux box, which is not
> on a firewall but has its own firewall enabled.
>
> I have in my hosts.allow file in.identd: all and I get messages from
> identd in the syslog, such as:
>
> Jun 16 14:31:11 linux identd[1537]: Connection from
> galaxynet.sprynet.com
> Jun 16 14:31:12 linux identd[1537]: from: 165.121.1.47 (
> galaxynet.sprynet.com ) for: 1269, 6667
>
> But no returned line, as if the connection is made but nothing is done.
> Is there more I need to do to allow identd connections, I've tried it on
> a few hosts that aren't allowed into my machine (by default) and they
> produce the same message. However, I can send commands to the identd
> server, so it seems to me that the firewall isn't interfering.
>
> Identd is so silly, but now a bot on a channel I hang on sometimes
> insists on ident or you're kicked, so I can't even get into the channel
> now.
Is your firewall denying the output back to the ident requestor? You might
do the trick I do here, to add a line at the end of your input and output
rules
that allows everything TCP flavored, but logs it in syslog; then run xchat,
or
whatever, see if it works, and then remove the logging rule, to get the
security back.
Perusal of the log afterwards will tell you what was needed but not handled
by
your "normal" firewall rules.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (newbie)
Subject: PPP problems
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:14:36 GMT
Okay, I've learn a lot already...
I'll stick with Gnome for now, but ppp doesn't work.
When I did my install, my modem wasn't in the box...
How can I install/config ppp ???
Thanks for helping a newbie
LinuxFool
------------------------------
From: "Stuart Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft
Retest News
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:11:43 +1200
Jason O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7kemol$sr0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It isn't MS's problem if someone exploits the tools provided in an Office
> >app. However it might be if a product didn't work as advertised - win
3.1
> >on DR-DOS for instance.
> >Does this mean that if I wrote a virus in VB that MS would be
responsible?
>
> In my mind, yes. They created a 'feature' that has brought IS departments
> using Office to their knees. This started with the tame but annoying word
> macro virus and has now gotten quite dangerous.
>
> >>and the knowledge
> >> that anyone could exploit IIS with a single line of code.
> >Are you suggesting that *nix has no bugs? Or requires no patches to get
> >running securely? ALL operating systems have bugs that must be patched,
I
> >don't care if it's linux, NT, Solaris etc. And why has no-one found this
> >bug until now - IIS 4.0 has been out for quite a while now...
>
> Unix certainly has had its troubles, especially with sendmail. But at
> this point, most of the issues have been resolved.
Excluding of course every new app that is released, or every new update...
Open source code and
> 20 years of release time have been helpful. Meanwhile, Windows and NT
> have been used for networking for but a few years and it's pretty clear
> that this is going to continue for quite some time. MS won't get sued
> over it, they'll make a killing selling fixes instead. Or perhaps people
> will start to realize the costs and move on.
They don't sell fixes - they are free.
------------------------------
From: "Jorge Canelhas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please help with samba
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 02:18:33 +0100
Im trying to make a samba server so that some nt users can acess my linux,
the catch is that i must make permissions and they dont seem to work, the
user Administrator works fine, but DirtyFly just cant login !!!!
here is my smb.conf file
***********************BEGIN
[global]
workgroup = DIRTYFLY
guest account = nobody
keep alive = 30
os level = 2
security = share
encrypt passwords = yes
update encrypted = yes
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
allow hosts = 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
; Please uncomment the following entry and replace the
; ip number and netmask with the correct numbers for
; your ethernet interface.
interfaces = 192.168.0.2/255.255.255.0
; If you want Samba to act as a wins server, please set
; 'wins support = yes'
wins support = no
; If you want Samba to use an existing wins server,
; please uncomment the following line and replace
; the dummy with the wins server's ip number.
; wins server = 192.168.1.1
; The following share gives all users access to the Server's CD drive,
; assuming it is mounted under /cd. To enable this share, please remove
; the semicolons before the lines
;
[cdrom]
preexec=mount /cdrom
postexec =umount /cdrom
comment = Linux CD-ROM
path = /cd
read only = yes
locking = no
public = yes
[SHARE1]
comment=Share1
path = /share1
read only = no
valid users = Administrator
[SHARE2]
comment=Share2
path=/share2
read only=no
valid users = DirtyFly ; Administrator
[printers]
comment = All Printers
browseable = no
printable = yes
public = no
read only = yes
create mode = 0700
directory = /tmp
*************************************END
So again the main goal is that admin can access both but dirtyfly just
share2
please email me to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
