Linux-Networking Digest #612, Volume #11         Mon, 21 Jun 99 21:13:52 EDT

Contents:
  Re: how do i diable remote telnet ftp and other listening/open ports? ("John Hardin")
  Re: Modem Sharing ("John Hardin")
  Neighbour table overflow ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Printing to a Windows 95 printer (Monte Phillips)
  Re: figured SAMBA out. ignore my previouse message. Got a question about PROXY .. 
any help? (Monte Phillips)
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest 
News (Philip Brown)
  Ip Masq: DirectPlay 6.0 Ports?? ("Devon Harding")
  Re: Win98 Machine Connected Via Modem, Linux Needs Connection..help!!!! 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Loading modules at boot ("John Hardin")
  Win98 Machine Connected Via Modem, Linux Needs Connection..help!!!!   ([D] [R] [O] 
[Z])
  Re: Why is linux perfomance bad compared to windows? (Yuki Taga)
  Licq & Ipchains  Help Please ("Brad Taylor")
  Re: PPP question ("Ken Farmer")
  Re: Loading modules at boot ("Cowles, Steve")
  L2TP and Linux (root)
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest 
News (Jason O'Rourke)
  Linux-Windows network setup (Dale Walker)
  Re: cable modem or ASDL (Geoff)
  Can Linux IP stack be "MS Proxy-fied"? (Ken Cormack)
  Linux sees winblows but not the other Linux box (chipw)
  Re: sendmail and NFS... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  please help me get online ("anorexorcist")
  Re: Linux-Windows network setup (Ken Cormack)
  NT can see Linux & vice versa (Chem-R-Us)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how do i diable remote telnet ftp and other listening/open ports?
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:28:48 -0700


Richard wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>what command can i use to dissable the ports on my system connected to
>my lan here at work so that i can lock down security?


man inetd.conf

Essentially, edit this file and comment out any services you do not want to
provide, then run "kill -HUP inetd" to reread the configuration file.

For those services you *do* want to provide to a limited audience, read

man hosts.allow

and set up access permissions. Also set up firewalling to permit only those
hosts to see the services you want, and block everything else. Think
"layered defenses".

http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/ipfwadm.html may be helpful.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin    PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
 PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
  In the Lion
  the Mighty Lion
  the Zebra sleeps tonight...
  Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!




------------------------------

From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Modem Sharing
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:30:26 -0700


Charles Ghent wrote in message <7km09p$cf6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Check out
>www.linux.org and look under support - there are a lot of HOW-TOs and
>Mini-HOW-TOs that give good information on how to set those kind of things
>up.
>
>Becky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7klu2h$jfh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>
>> I am a newbie of Linux. I am setting up a server using SuSE with windows
>> NT machines clients.   Is it possible to install a modem in the linux
>> server and allow the clients to access the internet?
>> If yes, what package can i use?


In particular, take a look at the IP Masquerade HOWTO, and the IP
Masquerade Resource page at http://ipmasq.cjb.net/

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin    PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
 PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
  In the Lion
  the Mighty Lion
  the Zebra sleeps tonight...
  Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Neighbour table overflow
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:30:03 GMT

Hi all.
  I'm getting odd messages from my machine, which serves as a NAT box,
masquerading for my private network.  I've tried changing
kernels(currently at 2.2.10) and ipchains options, subnetting, changing
masks, pretty much everything I can think of to eliminate this.

But every of often I get messages like this:

Neighbour table overflow
Neighbour table overflow
Neighbour table overflow
Neighbour table overflow
Neighbour table overflow
NET: 21 messages suppressed
Neighbour table overflow
Neighbour table overflow
Neighbour table overflow
NET:53 messages suppressed

etc., so on and so forth.

so, I've got 2 major questions. What IS the neighbour table and its
function, and how can I fix this problem?

Any help at all would be appreciated.
Thanks,
        Ryan



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Printing to a Windows 95 printer
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:50:04 GMT

Yes!  You will have to set up samba, it provides file and printer
sharing both directions.
This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba.  steps
for both linux and the win machine.  (and they really work <G>)
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
and this one as well
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html

These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
networked.

On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 21:05:12 +0100, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
Does anyone know whether it's possible to print to a printer
>attached to a Windows 95 (Sorry!) machine from Linux. The reason I want
>to do this is because the printer itself is one of those "Windows"
>printers. I figured if I have a sort of print server (486) I could use
>it from Linux. If anyone know of any sites which would tell me how to do
>this that would be great.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: figured SAMBA out. ignore my previouse message. Got a question about 
PROXY .. any help?
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:53:23 GMT

Well Tiger ol' buddy, after reading that first paragraph,  I believe I
will NOT help you.

 "Tiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have been for a while looking for help and did not get it for a simple
>problem.. of which did not get help. I think we just have to find the hard
>way and do not help each other.
>
>Well, Dos any one know about proxy?? I need to set my machine as a proxy
>server for the rest of the lab I'm working in. no NT available Linux will be
>the only machine.

Yep, I know about setting up a proxy, but I won't tell you now.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft 
Retest News
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 Jun 1999 21:29:31 GMT

On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:22:10 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
>Neither do MS apps.  Outlook prompts to run or save when you double click on
>it.

and there's a little box to uncheck, "show this window again?"

I wonder what percentage of MS users ever see that window again.


-- 
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
 --------------------------------------------------
The word of the day is mispergitude


------------------------------

From: "Devon Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ip Masq: DirectPlay 6.0 Ports??
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:16:23 -0400

Does anyone know how to open these ports on a Linux Ip Masq box?

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/sdkdoc/directx/cpp_dpover_78op.htm

or

Initial TCP Connection                                    47624 Outbound
Subsequent Inbound TCP Connections            2300-2400
Subsequent Outbound TCP Connections         2300-2400
Subsequent Inbound UDP Connections            2300-2400
Subsequent Outbound UDP Connections         2300-2400



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win98 Machine Connected Via Modem, Linux Needs Connection..help!!!!
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:36:38 GMT

[D] [R] [O] [Z] wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>     I have a Win98 machine with a cable modem, internal. I want to be
> able to use linux thu the win98 machine. I have both computers on a
> 5-port hub, they both ping each other, however, how do i get to use
> Linux thru the 98 machine, now here is my wish.. I would like to use
> all the shell utilities, i know x-windows is the thing, but i want to
> be able to use the other stuff in the shell, like lynx, telnet, etc...
> is this possible??? Any help can and will be much appreciated..
> -Nick

*ponder* I don't think it can be accomplished through Win9X. It can be
done with NT I know,  using the RAS  and a private network.  I'm not that
familiar with 98 so I'm not totally sure. The problem lies in the fact
that win9x wasn't really designed to be server OS, and is peer-to-peer,
or a client.

There might be some software out there (ie WinGate) that might help,
though. Good luck in your efforts.

Ryan


------------------------------

From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Loading modules at boot
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:24:39 -0700


Albert Want wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've installed a second ethernet card on my PC but, since it's a tulip
>adapter, at the startup it fails because the module is not loaded.
>
>How to load modules at start-up in RedHat 6.0 ?
>
>Thanks in advance


man lilo.conf, paying attention to the discussion of "append=".

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin    PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
 PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
=======================================================================
  In the Lion
  the Mighty Lion
  the Zebra sleeps tonight...
  Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([D] [R] [O] [Z])
Subject: Win98 Machine Connected Via Modem, Linux Needs Connection..help!!!!  
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:26:36 GMT

Hi Guys,
    I have a Win98 machine with a cable modem, internal. I want to be
able to use linux thu the win98 machine. I have both computers on a
5-port hub, they both ping each other, however, how do i get to use
Linux thru the 98 machine, now here is my wish.. I would like to use
all the shell utilities, i know x-windows is the thing, but i want to
be able to use the other stuff in the shell, like lynx, telnet, etc...
is this possible??? Any help can and will be much appreciated..
-Nick

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yuki Taga)
Subject: Re: Why is linux perfomance bad compared to windows?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:00:03 GMT

On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:08:24 -0400, in article
<7klv2q$5on$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Charles Ghent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Bah :)
>
>Granted, I now work in a place where they have many NT boxes, and for the
>most part - I say the most part - they run pretty well.  Unfortunately, if
>you don't reboot them periodically (at least once a week) they will begin to
>develop interesting personality "quirks".

I take issue with that statement.  I work with NT boxes that stay up for months
and don't develop problems.

>With a linux box, especially with the 2.0.x kernels, they rarely go down.
>Boxes setup by someone with even the most basic understanding of Linux can
>be up and running for months without a reboot.  Granted, it might take a bit
>more work to set the OS up, but once it's up it's very reliable.

No argument.  But so is NT, if you take the time to set it up properly.  If you
expect it to run flawlessly out of the box, you're dreaming.

>The fact that you might take offense that someone is comparing Linux
>FREEWARE to the ever quality conscious Microsoft folks speaks volumes :)

I never said I was defending M$.  But too often Linux people are simply blinded
by M$ hatred.  And they toss out facts about M$ systems that were true several
years ago, as if they were current pieces of information.  They aren't.  <g>

Yuki ^_^

------------------------------

From: "Brad Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Licq & Ipchains  Help Please
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 08:39:58 +1000

I have Licq running and cannot recieve files from other users. The system is
configured for masquerading with ipchains. PC's on the local network can
access the internet and connect to ICQ.

What do I need to do to enable file transfer.

Thanks




------------------------------

From: "Ken Farmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP question
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 22:31:39 -0500


Steve Willis wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am a new user to Linux, using Redhat 5.2.  I followed the instructions at
>http://www.ftrend.com.my/linux based on an answer to an earlier question to


Before any newbie does anything with PPP, he (or she) should print out the
PPP-HOWTO from your CD, or off the net, and the "How to hook up PPP" at
http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html by W.G. Unruh.
That last one is really good.

I was stumbling around with PPP, read the proper documents, and got it
working forthwith.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Loading modules at boot
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:30:05 -0500

I'm sure there are many ways to skin a cat!, but on my RedHat 6.0 system, I
load the NIC drivers through /etc/conf.modules (see below). I have two 3Com
NIC's. 1) 3c590 2) 3c509

Hope this helps
Steve Cowles

The following is my /etc/conf.modules file:
####### /etc/conf.modules #######
alias eth0 3c59x
alias eth1 3c509
alias ppp-compress-21   slhc
alias ppp-compress-24   bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-26   ppp_deflate

Albert Want <al-want@#--remove--#usa.net> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've installed a second ethernet card on my PC but, since it's a tulip
> adapter, at the startup it fails because the module is not loaded.
>
> How to load modules at start-up in RedHat 6.0 ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>



------------------------------

From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: L2TP and Linux
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 18:23:26 -0500

Hello all:

I am interested in seeing if anyone knows of any other l2tp LAC servers.
I am primarily interested in using this to work with LNS servers
external to my workstation.
I presently am toying with the stuff found at http://www.marko.net
But it is somewhat unfinished.
My main goal is to establish a tunnel as a LAC, and then drop Calls over
this tunnel to the LNS.. (at least that's the idea anyways)

Much thanks in advance for any pointers or suggestions.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason O'Rourke)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft 
Retest News
Date: 21 Jun 1999 15:50:26 -0700

Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unix certainly has had its troubles, especially with sendmail.  But at
>> this point, most of the issues have been resolved.

>Excluding of course every new app that is released, or every new update...

Which new apps are you referring to?  Most don't reinvent the wheel (see
NT) and don't open up numerous new holes.  Unix vunerabilities typical
involve getting uid 0 access.  Windows vunerabilities involve getting any
access, which is much easier, especially when MS helps with macro
languages.  

>They don't sell fixes - they are free.

I guess you haven't seen the $20 Windows 98 SE yet - bunch of fixes you
could possibly download, plus newest IE, plus a utility to let you run a
NATD like function to network your house off one NIC.  
-- 
Jason O'Rourke  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.jor.com
'96 BMW r850R
last dive: June 13th, Pescadero Wash Rocks (Carmel), 46 mins at 64ft max

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Walker)
Subject: Linux-Windows network setup
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:10:44 GMT

I'm experienced with Windows networking using TCP/IP and have just
cobbled together a spare PC to learn about Linux. I've had a bit of
experience with UNIX but not in setting anything up.

I'm trying to network a Windows 98 based PC with the Linux one but I
need a bit of guidance on how to do this. I've got an NE2000 based NIC
in each machine and a crossover patch cable between them so I think
I've got the right hardware. On the Windows side I have an IP address
of 192.168.0.2, a host name of WinPC and a domain name of 'net'.

What's the simplest test to see if the NIC cards and cable is
functioning correctly?

Assuming I want the Linux machine to be called LinuxPC and have an IP
address of 192.168.0.1, what do I do next?

What else do I need to do to get both machines to talk to each other
with the Linux machine as the server? I'll probably want to access
both machines from each other, at least for a while. I've a feeling
Samba might come in handy. How do you set that up? I'll probably need
to work my way through an Apache setup as well.

Any hints, help or directions in finding decent tutorials on Win-Linux
networking, Samba or Apache would be greatly appreciated.



==================================================================
| Dale Walker                       London Techno Events         |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]            |
| London, UK                        http://www.sorted.org/london |
==================================================================

------------------------------

From: Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cable modem or ASDL
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:53:28 GMT

Im running a Terayon TeraPro modem on @home in Alberta, Canada. I live in an area
with a lot of older people, and as far as I can tell, I am the only one using my
node. I love it, as my download speeds max at more than T3 equivilancy, and my
uploads match a T1 (~125kb/s).

(and btw, the reason that this says geoff instead of inkey$ in the header is
becuase im posting from netscape instead of outlook)




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Cormack)
Subject: Can Linux IP stack be "MS Proxy-fied"?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:17:53 GMT

Hello, all.

I'm seeing related postings about this, and since I am in a similar
boat myself, I was wondering if anyone has given any thought to
creating an "MS Proxy-fied" version of the Linux IP stack?

I'm not talking about the "Socks" functionality, or even the "Reverse
Proxy" stuff...  Specifically, I refer you to the "Winsock Proxy"
client functionality of MS-Proxy 2.0.

If I understand MS Proxy's "Winsock Proxy" functionality, a Win9x or
other MS Proxy-supported client's WINSOCK.DLL gets re-named, the
Proxy's own Winsock version gets put into place, and calls the renamed
original file's services when needed.

The advantage to this is that you dont need to putz with each
individual client app's own proxy settings (when they are available
and/or supported), or try recompiling every client app  to "socksify"
it, etc.  If it calls the services of WINSOCK.DLL, it just normally
works (for outbound stuff, anyway.  For inbound UDP's etc, well, thems
is the breaks.)

It's far more elegant (and much less a hassle for the end-user) to
attack the problem at the point of commonality on the client, and you
gain the advantage of making many otherwise proxy-ignorant apps
available to the user through the proxy.

It strikes me as practical to impliment something similar in Linux,
"intercepting" calls to the IP stack, and in a fashion similar to the
MS client, tweak the packets on-the-fly, steering them to the MS Proxy
server.

Adding the needed functionality and configuration parameters as
configurable options to the kernel "make config" or "make menuconfig"
would be terrific.  If it could be implimented as a module, it might
be even better.

A few of you will suggest using a Linux server with IP Masq'ing
instead of MS-Proxy, but in situations where that is just not an
option, wouldn't it be better in the long run to consider such a
cross-platform coexistance?  (Especially if you want to make Linux a
more attractive option for corporate desktops?)

Just a thought.  Any comments?

Ken

------------------------------

From: chipw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux sees winblows but not the other Linux box
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:11:38 -0700

I have two dual-boot machines, machine one is win95/Linux and machine
two is win98/Linux. When in Linux or winblows on either machine, they
see each other just fine. But when both are in Linux (RH5.2), what
command do I use- seems the same command to talk to winblows doesn't
work in Linux. And - can I make an icon (KDE) on the desktop for the
remote harddrives? Like the ones for the cd drive and floppy drive?
Chip


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail and NFS...
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:33:06 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  "Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "srix" == srix  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've set up a sendmail server to use NFS mounts for
/var/spool/mqueue
> > and /var/spool/mail. It works, but if I try to send 100+ mails in
quick
>
> I don't know how to solve your specific problem, but I'd recommend
just
> not to do that.  For one, I really can't see why you'd want the mqueue
> to be accessed via NFS.  And for the spool, it's better to export it
via NFS
> from the mail-server than to import it to the mail-server.

Thanks for your quick reply. Maybe I should explain a little more about
why I'm trying the NFS mount. Basically the sendmail server is a smaller
machine, and its job is only mail. Other machines will be web and news
servers, and all of them will be accessing one file server (NFS), which
is a big box with loads of disk space. Major reason being that we want
to keep all the data at one location (which is also mirrored elsewhere).

Any ideas?

Srix.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

Reply-To: "anorexorcist" <anorexorcistDON'[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "anorexorcist" <anorexorcistDON'[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please help me get online
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:11:26 GMT

if someone is using linux (specifically the redhat distribution) and
concentric as there dial up isp (or for that matter any dial up isp) please
contact me...i'm having difficulty getting online with linux.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Cormack)
Subject: Re: Linux-Windows network setup
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:37:55 GMT

On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:10:44 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Walker) wrote:

>I'm experienced with Windows networking using TCP/IP and have just
>cobbled together a spare PC to learn about Linux. I've had a bit of
>experience with UNIX but not in setting anything up.
>
>I'm trying to network a Windows 98 based PC with the Linux one but I
>need a bit of guidance on how to do this. I've got an NE2000 based NIC
>in each machine and a crossover patch cable between them so I think
>I've got the right hardware. On the Windows side I have an IP address
>of 192.168.0.2, a host name of WinPC and a domain name of 'net'.
>
>What's the simplest test to see if the NIC cards and cable is
>functioning correctly?
>
>Assuming I want the Linux machine to be called LinuxPC and have an IP
>address of 192.168.0.1, what do I do next?
>
>What else do I need to do to get both machines to talk to each other
>with the Linux machine as the server? I'll probably want to access
>both machines from each other, at least for a while. I've a feeling
>Samba might come in handy. How do you set that up? I'll probably need
>to work my way through an Apache setup as well.
>
>Any hints, help or directions in finding decent tutorials on Win-Linux
>networking, Samba or Apache would be greatly appreciated.
>

I suppose I'll say it first (but it wont be the last time you hear
it).  Read the Docs, Readme's, and HOW-TO's that were loaded on your
system when you installed Linux (start with the HOW-TO's, for
generally the fastest ways to get things up and running)

A good place for on-line versions of all the info you'll need is
available at any of the LDP (Linux Documentation Project) mirror
sites.  Here's one you can start with...

http://www.kernelnotes.org/LDP/

As for the easiest way to see if your network connectivity is ok?  I
would try a simple "ping" of each host from the other...

Ken

------------------------------

From: Chem-R-Us <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NT can see Linux & vice versa
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:58:24 -0700


I used to ipchains win98 -> Linux -> Internet

Can I now:

Linux -> WinNT -> (@home) -> Internet

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. I am a definite NT newbie
and hate MS in general, but it's the way of the world (so I'm stuck
with it for now).

Can anybody help me? Pointers, RTFMs to read, etc?

TIA

Denning

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to