Linux-Networking Digest #636, Volume #11 Wed, 23 Jun 99 14:13:41 EDT
Contents:
Re: PPP default route problems?? Me too! :) (Clifford Kite)
Re: ppp always connects but sometimes drops (Clifford Kite)
Re: TCI@HOME with linux (Stuart R. Fuller)
MRTG 2.7.5 problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
a few problems ("Dave")
Re: Samba semi-working; Need help with Internet Connection (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: Samba and Win98 ("Dan Tager")
Re: wanted: costs calculation program for proxy-server users ("Curt")
proxy program for win98/NT server + linux client ("kawing")
Re: How to??? - ADSL w/SuSE 6.1 (Spicoli)
Re: Basic network problem ("Ole Jakobsen")
Re: file permissions with mounted vfat partition HELP PLEASE (Thomas Zajic)
Re: Registering in .fr domain (Marc Mutz)
Re: Linux w/Win clients on a corporate server (Mike Jagdis)
Re: pppd LCP error (Clifford Kite)
Re: Linux+Windoze+Mac How To? (Dave Hamilton)
Auto-dialing and IP-masquearding ("James")
HELP!! 3COM, Qtags and VLANS (Robin Frederick Philpotts)
Re: Win98 Machine Connected Via Modem, Linux Needs Connection..help!!!! (Monty
Scroggins)
X-CDRoast: kernel found 10 new scsi devices each for my cdrw/cdrom.. (Ho smacka')
Re: read-only fils system (Villy Kruse)
Re: Sharing Inet connections; win98 + linux ("Tony C")
Virtual domains in Qmail ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: tar'ing to a NT based 4mm SCSI dat via samba? ("Dan Tager")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP default route problems?? Me too! :)
Date: 23 Jun 1999 10:15:43 -0500
root ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have this exact same problem. I have a made up ip and domain name
: on my machine
The "made up ip" for eth0 below doesn't belong to the reserved networks.
You will find yourself in trouble if these get to the Internet.
: binky.lunatick.com 208.221.1.1
: here is my route table -
: Kernel IP routing table
: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
: Iface
: 208.221.1.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
: eth0
: 204.140.219.3 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
: ppp0
: 208.221.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
: eth0
: 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
: default 204.140.219.3 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
: ppp0
: default 208.221.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
: eth0
: [root@binky /root]#
I don't know what your scripts do but pppd cannot set a default route
when there is an existing default route, even with the defaultroute
option. You have two default routes showing up and only one of these
can be the active default route.
Since you can't get past the ISP machine on the other end of the wire the
eth0 default route must be the active one. In order for this to be so
it had to be created after the default route through ppp0 was created.
This very likely means that one of the scripts involved in bringing up
pppd and the ppp0 interface created it.
You need to find the command in the scripts where the default route
through eth0 is created and delete it. The network specific route
shown above is all you need for the LAN - but use addresses from
one of the reserved networks!
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp always connects but sometimes drops
Date: 23 Jun 1999 09:56:05 -0500
Basel Shishani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I'm having this weird problem when connecting to my ISP
: (OptusNet-Australia) from my linux box (i586 - kernel 2.0.36 -
: RH5.2). After establishing a *successful* ppp connection, the line will
: drop after some few seconds to few minutes of activity. However, this
: behavior is not consistent, in some instances it just connects and stays
: connected for hours without any problems, in other instances I keep
: getting the line drops repeatedly (ie. connecting successfully then
: dropping on successive tests)
: I also tested on windows NT (same machine) successfully a couple of
: times but not enough times to establish that NT side is problem free.
: The modem I know is no culprit because it connects to other ISPs without
: any problems.
I'd guess that the ISP is the problem, e.g., sometimes you connect to
flaky hardware and sometimes not. You might be able to confirm or deny
this by trying to correlate the IP address of the ISP machine to which
you connect with the dropouts. I'd also believe it might have something
to do with whether the ISP was loaded with many connections or not.
: I included my chat scripts and a log of a single session (with kdebug=1)
: where dropouts were occurring. If you can spot any abnormality in the
: log messages or have any suggestions as to why this should be happening,
: I would really appreciate your help.
The link negotiation messages looked completely normal. There were no
errors in the data exchange messages to indicate anything wrong on your
side of the connection.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller)
Subject: Re: TCI@HOME with linux
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:00:03 GMT
Jan Fure ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi;
:
: I am currently able to get the @home cable modem through TCI in
: Portland, OR. I would like to hear about linux users experiences, i.e.
: can you telnet in, how reliable is it etc.
Works fine. I can telnet in, FTP, access my web server, etc. Note that
remote access to my Linux box tends to be low volume.
It's usually up. I run a ping once per minute, and log any failures. There
are periods of 10-20 minutes where it's down, but they tend to be when I'm
asleep, and not very often.
: I am not asking about how to convert from win to linux setup after the
: installer leaves, I just want to get a feel for whether users are happy,
: if it's worth the extra money.
Considering that a 2nd phone line is $25/month, plus ISP charges, it actually
works out to be cheaper.
: Also does $150 for installation plus $40/month sound right?
I got a special when it first became available in my neighborhoold: $75
install and first month free, with $40/month after that. It doesn't cost
anything to ask.
Stu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRTG 2.7.5 problems
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:17:10 GMT
I'm running RedHat 6 and trying to get MRTG 2.7.5
to run. I have compiled the prog correctly and
pulled the required config files off of another
linux box which this one shall be replacing. Upon
trying to run './mrtg mrtg.cfg' I get an error
about an outdated SNMP_Session.pm file, yet can
find no other file by that name. Any suggestions?
Tyler C. Hayward
Computer Information Systems
Northland College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: a few problems
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:35:44 -0500
I have just a few problems that I need help with.
1. When I start X, I get a "hostname: lookup failure" just before it loads.
2. I have to go into X to get my ppp connection activated. If I quit X, the
connection dumps as well. I have it set to activate at boot, but it doens't
actually stay connected unless X is running.
3. SMB starts; NMB doesn't, so Samba doesn't work right.
Dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Samba semi-working; Need help with Internet Connection
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 06:06:40 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blane A. Balch) writes:
Please adjust your newsreader to be wrapping your lines at some 72 chars.
[...]
>My problem is is that Network Neighborhood shows my Linux
>computer as "ADSL-216-62-152" rather than "Linux" which I
>would prefer.
[...]
Edit /etc/HOSTNAME .
For your Win98-Internet connection, you'll ned to setup IP firewalling and
IP Masquerading on The Linux box. Your Winboxes don't have real IP addresses,
therfor the Linux box must be setup to "masquerade" all requests coming from
these boxes.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: "Dan Tager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba and Win98
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:47:16 -0400
Brian Witowski wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Greetings,
>
>Occassionally I get 'Fatal Errors' or other blue-screen crashes on my
>Win98 box when attempting to open a file directly off my Linux server.
>It seems like the only way to do this reliably is to drag it across to
>my
>Win98 box then open it locally. Does anybody have any idea why
>this happens? In every other way, the network functions perfectly.
>
Hmmm.. You know, I seem to get the same thing with Win98 and Samba running
on a SCO box. It is very intermittent.
--Dan
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
nl.burgerrechten,nl.internet.algemeen,nl.internet.misbruik,nl.internet.providers,nl.internet.www.ontwerp,nl.juridisch,nl.politiek,nlnet.misc,soc.culture.yugoslavia
Subject: Re: wanted: costs calculation program for proxy-server users
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:39:43 -0500
You might just want to look into using socks. www.socks.nec.com
It has a perl based report generator, that probably could be modified to
assign cost by volume or cost by time.
It also gives you a little more control than a simple NAT.
Ruud Prein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, I am installing a Linux proxy server for 40 people. The
server
> has one IP address, which passes the messages etc. to the appropiate
computer
> on the IntraNet.
> What I am looking for now is a 'program' which can gather all information
on
> the users of the IntraNet, what and how log they have used the Internet
> (provided by the server) and calculate the costs per user of the IntraNet.
>
> I am willing to give any additional information to explain the 'program' I
am
> looking for.
>
> Thanks and kind regards,
>
> Ruud Prein
> Research assistent
>
------------------------------
From: "kawing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: proxy program for win98/NT server + linux client
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:59:15 -0700
Which proxy program can allow me to use a Win98 or/and NT server as
server, but a linux as a client?
I have a network of 2 computers. One is a dual-boot of WIn98/NT, the
other is linux. I want to share Internet access between them but don't
know what proxy server program I should use. I have WinGate but seems
it only work on Windows networks.
Any suggestion will be welcomed,
kawing
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spicoli)
Subject: Re: How to??? - ADSL w/SuSE 6.1
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:03:28 GMT
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 07:59:54 -0700, Alex Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- snip -
>Just login as root, then use YaST to config the network. Save the
>changes, log out from root. Piece of cake. Should takes no more than 2-3
>minutes.
>
>Forget the SuSE manuel. It tells you absolute nothing, other than the
>initial installation.
>
>Alex Lam.
>
- snip -
Thanks for the tip Alex! It took all of 3 minutes and now my ADSL is
up and running!
Spicoli
spicoli at aracnet dot com
------------------------------
From: "Ole Jakobsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Basic network problem
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:09:34 +0200
Thanks for the tip.
Ole Jakobsen
Monte Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Rather than fo a 20 questions routine <G> I will point you to the
> following.
> This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
> for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
> http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
> and this one as well
> http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
>
> These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
> networked.
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:20:25 +0200, "Ole Jakobsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >I installed my ethernet adapeter ETH0, with a NE driver as it is NE2000
> >compatible. Linux boots this device fine. But I am not sure if it is
> >working, as it's an old card, the IRQ and IO should be correct through.
> >
> >The other network options I have set is:
> >
> >IP:192.168.100.10
> >SUBNET:255.255.255.0
> >DEFAULT GATEWAY:192.168.100.1
> >
> >On the ethernet there is a NT with IP 192.168.100.2 and the same subnet
> >mask, there is also a router witch gateway ip is set to 192.168.100.1
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Zajic)
Subject: Re: file permissions with mounted vfat partition HELP PLEASE
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 06:29:40 GMT
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 03:49:40 GMT, Aaron wrote:
> ok i tried everything i could think of....i have a vfat partiontion mounted
> to /files but i have no control over the permissions i try giving everyone
> rwx but it doesnt change anything.....
> i do chmod a=rwx /files
> and i still all user still cant write, only the owner and group...
Here's what Works Fine For Me[tm] - from /etc/fstab:
/dev/hda1 /mnt/dos/c vfat defaults,user,gid=100,umask=002,quiet 0 2
Have a look at the "Mount options for FAT" chapter in 'man mount'
for details about the options involved (gid=100 is "users" on my
Slackware system, BTW).
HTH,
Thomas
--
=--- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria ---=
=-- "It is not easy to cut through a human head with a hacksaw." M.C. --=
=-- Posted with Free Agent 1.11/32 running on Linux 2.0.37/Wine-990226 --=
=--- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at ---=
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:25:58 +0200
From: Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Registering in .fr domain
Grant Guenther wrote:
>
> I have a customer here in Canada who wants to be able to register a domain
> in the .fr TLD. My understanding of the process is that the application
> must be submitted through an ISP that is a member of AFNIC.
>
You should be able to do this by yourself, which has the added benefit
of you being sure that the domain is registered as your's and not as
your ISP's, which will make changing ISPs *much* easier.
Marc
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Subject: Re: Linux w/Win clients on a corporate server
Date: 23 Jun 1999 16:05:44 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Monte Phillips wrote:
>Only caveat I know of is the 95bugfix option in the kernel setup.
But that only applies if you want to mount filesystem *from*
Windows machines on Linux, not vice versa. Anyway it is a mount
option (if your mount program is new enough) and you should
always build the kernel with it *off* (that's just the default
setting).
Mike
--
A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 2 Markham Mews, Broad Street | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| Wokingham ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: pppd LCP error
Date: 23 Jun 1999 07:05:36 -0500
Anthony Tickner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I am a relatively new user of linux so please excuse me if I sound a bit
: lost.
: I am having this problem with a Novell box dialing into a slackware linux
: box running Kernel 2.0.33. The problem is that I can not get the servers
: to agree on what seems to be one section of the LCP negotiations. I have
: include a section of log where the errors are occurring.
: You will notice that the common cause of the error is the HEX code of < 17
: 04 00 fb>
: Would anyone have any ideas on what this problem could be or any ideas on
: where to start looking? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
: Jun 23 10:05:34 hob-ts1 pppd[24999]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
: <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x462a35cc> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jun 23 10:05:37 hob-ts1 pppd[24999]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
: <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x462a35cc> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jun 23 10:05:37 hob-ts1 pppd[24999]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3d <mru 1508>
: <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x52a84> < 17 04 00 fb>]
: Jun 23 10:05:37 hob-ts1 pppd[24999]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x3d < 17 04 00
: fb>]
The LCP option 17h is for a Link Discriminator to use with Bandwidth
Allocation Control Protocol, BACP, described in RFC 2125. It is a two
octet integer used to define a unique link for a multilink bundle.
The Novell insists on it and pppd can't do it and so rejects it.
Neither side will or can budge and the negotiations fail.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */
------------------------------
From: Dave Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux+Windoze+Mac How To?
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:51:31 GMT
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
There are two ways to do this. One is that you could install DAVE from
Thursby Systems (www.thursby.com) on the Mac. This allows the Mac to
act as a "Client for Microsoft Networks" and will see your samba
broadcasts, etc. DAVE, of course, is not free.
The other option would be to set up netatalk on your Linux machine,
which essentially lets it act like an AppleShare (both Appletalk and
IP) server. This works quite well and is free.
-Dave
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Lam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to set up a Linux box to share files between other
> Linux/FreeBSD, Windoze and Mac together. I got the Linux/FreeBSD/Windoze
> part done through Samba and ipchains. Now how do I add Mac and PowerPC
> to the chain?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alex Lam.
------------------------------
From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Auto-dialing and IP-masquearding
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 19:08:09 +0200
Has anyone a running configuration which allows the linux-box to
automatically dial the ISP if a PC in the network sends a request?
I tried to configure diald, but without success. If I start it, it just
makes nothing :-(
The IP-masquerading just works fine.
My favourite conf would be that diald uses wvdial (great tool!) to make the
connection to the ISP.
I have two PCs connected to my linux box. The ISP gives me a dynamic IP
address.
Thanx for all your answers.
James
--
==================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 2808449
http://hpcomm.cjb.net
==================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robin Frederick Philpotts)
Subject: HELP!! 3COM, Qtags and VLANS
Date: 23 Jun 1999 16:55:38 GMT
Hello.
I am currently running a Linux server with a 3com905B-TX NIC. The
switches that I am using for my network are 802.1Q compliant, that is, I
can implement VLANS. Problem is, though, is that the 905B-TX NIC I am
using has Qtag support built in but does not seem to have any useful Linux
drivers to use for this feature. As a result I am at a loss on how to
implement vlans using this NIC in my server.
I am curious if anyone can point me in the right direction.
RP
------------------------------
From: Monty Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 Machine Connected Via Modem, Linux Needs Connection..help!!!!
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:27:47 GMT
Ken Cormack wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:36:38 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >[D] [R] [O] [Z] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Guys,
> >> I have a Win98 machine with a cable modem, internal. I want to be
> >> able to use linux thu the win98 machine. I have both computers on a
> >> 5-port hub, they both ping each other, however, how do i get to use
> >> Linux thru the 98 machine, now here is my wish.. I would like to use
> >> all the shell utilities, i know x-windows is the thing, but i want to
> >> be able to use the other stuff in the shell, like lynx, telnet, etc...
> >> is this possible??? Any help can and will be much appreciated..
> >> -Nick
> >
If you are wishing to share a PPP connection from Win98 to a linux box,
check out sygate. It is a proxylike program that will share your IP, the
difference between sygate and some of the others is that it is NAT based.
Therefore a proxy doesnt have to be configured on the remote machines.
Just a thought
Monty
------------------------------
From: Ho smacka' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X-CDRoast: kernel found 10 new scsi devices each for my cdrw/cdrom..
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 06:17:15 -0700
I have an IDE Memorex CRW-1622 and a generic 4x CD-Rom. I recompiled
with all the neccesary options to use my IDE CD-RW under linux and after
doing so, my kernel decided to find about a screen and a half worth of
new scsi devices (about 10 per IDE device) I have an SCSI HDD as well.
Any ideas?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: read-only fils system
Date: 18 Jun 1999 08:48:16 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Wayne D. Hoxsie Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You can override the RO specification that is in your /etc/lilo.conf on
>the lilo command line (when you get "lilo:" hit <CTRL> or <ALT>):
>
>lilo: boot: linux rw
>
Sure you can do that, but that would make the problem worse.
>This will get you going with some warnings about e2fsck'ing a RW drive,
>but you can then edit your /etc/rc.d/rc.S back to its original state and
>be fine.
>
The warning from fsck is for a good reason. You shouldn't fsck a mounted
file system, but for the root file system you can as a compromise leave
it read only, so you won't check a file system that is being modified
by using it at the same time.
The original question was as far as I understood: why you couldn't leave
the root file system in read only mode like you can (supposed to be able
to) with a separate /usr file system.
Villy
------------------------------
From: "Tony C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sharing Inet connections; win98 + linux
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 23:43:41 -0700
Then you might consider doing what I did. I have 2 Windows computers that I
use all the time for various tasks including email, web surfing, home office
(word/excel etc..) and online gaming. Upgrades to the second computer left
me with enough parts to build a Linux box. The hardware is a P5-200MMX
processor with 80M RAM, 1.6G non-UDMA hard drive, Matrox Millenium (original
version) w/4M WRAM, a 6X CD and 2 LinkSys 10/100 LAN cards.
I use the Linux box to connect to a DSL line (384K/384K). The 2 Windows PCs
are networked (via 10/100 hub) to the second LAN card in the Linux box and
are able to connect to the Internet through IP Masquerading. The Linux box
is more than capable of handling all the network traffic as well as
supporting applications like email, news, and Web browsing. This way the
Windows boxes can use all their power to run Windows applications and they
will need it!
Cheers
TC
Zigron wrote in message <1Tia3.982$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Is it possible to share an internet connection between a Win98
>box and a linux (redhat 6.0), with the Win98 box actually being
>the 'host'?
> I know you can share two windows boxes with WinGate or
>Win98 SE's new "Internet Sharing" feature, or maybe something
>else?
> I need the Win98 machine to be the host because it is the better
>computer, and windows needs more computing power then linux
>does, and besides, there are numerous apps that I *require* the
>use of frequently which aren't available in linux.
>
>Thanks for any help!
>
>--Stephen
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Virtual domains in Qmail
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:30:46 GMT
I was wondering if you guys can give me your opinion on this. Right now
through my virtual domains file (/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains), I
have:
webheadshots.com:mail
Which means that all mail sent over to webheadshots.com gets sent over
to system account "mail".
Now, is there a way to change it to make all the email to a SPECIFIC
USER gets routed to a specific user? Kinda like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:mail [everything for [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets
sent to mail]
I can't use aliasing because aliasing can't distinguish between
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] since both domains use
the same MX record.
Any suggestions?
- Steve
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Dan Tager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: tar'ing to a NT based 4mm SCSI dat via samba?
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:14:48 -0400
Peter Espen wrote in message <7kdtcg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a NT box and a redhat 5.2 box on a fast ethernet
>network and am already sharing filesystems via samba. I
>have a 4mm DAT on the Windows NT system via an Adaptec
>2940 SCSI interface.
>
>Is there a way for me to tar and dump on linux to the
>4mm dat on the NT system?
>
How about using a DOS version of tar. I would think you should be able to
mount the samba shares that you want to back up and then tar the stuff to
your NT tape drive just as you would on a unix box. Actually you shouldn't
even need to mount the shares.
--Dan
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
