Linux-Networking Digest #653, Volume #11 Thu, 24 Jun 99 18:14:22 EDT
Contents:
Re: isp proxy (Derek Lucas)
Ricochet and PPP (RH6) (Rik Sagar)
Re: alternatives to ip masquerade?? ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Help: domain propagation ("Andrey Smirnov")
ALERT! Do not use stock RedHat 6.0 kernels with SMBFS! (Monte Phillips)
IP address binding to interface device .. (shyam)
Re: TCP options? (poodah)
Re: Can't establish a ppp connection over a modem. (Clifford Kite)
Re: PCI network card problem (RealTek 8029) (Bob Tennent)
Re: LAN connectivity problem (Greg Yantz)
Re: IP adress for small network that needs internet access ("change")
Re: Why not C++ ("Stefan Monnier "
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Re: Ipchains and ip port forwarding... (Erik-Jan Sinke)
Re: Why not C++ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: sendmail - user unknow ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help: domain propagation (Scientia)
Changing Monitors in X????? ("Matt")
Re: LAN connectivity problem ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Windows95 box -> Linux Box (Static IP) -> Intranet -> Internet? ("Andrey
Smirnov")
Question ("Chris Seaton")
PPP problem (Big Fish)
Re: Need advice on modem (Glen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:50:15 -0400
From: Derek Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: isp proxy
For web caching proxying, download squid & install it.
For proxying, such as ipmasqurading, you can use ipfwadm or ipchains
(you'll probably have to use ipfwadm, since you run redhat 5 -- unless you
patch your kernel for ipchains).
--
Derek Lucas
Systems Administrator
OneNet Communications, Inc.
513.618.1000 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, DAVID M MCNAMARA wrote:
> how do i set up a proxy server in red hat linux 5
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Rik Sagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ricochet and PPP (RH6)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:56:57 -0700
Does anyone have any experience of using the Ricochet Wireless Modem
with Redhat 6.0 and PPP?
I have a strange problem, in that PPP does seem to start-up correctly
(the modem chirps to say it has connected), I can then PING various
servers and get a reasonable response time (300-500mS), but when I try
to do either a FTP of a use a browser, I get no response from the server
I try to connect.
Does this sound like a PPP problem, or is there something else further
that I need to address?
Thanks in advance,
Rik.
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: alternatives to ip masquerade??
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:07:00 -0700
There are some fixes for ip_masq to make icq and netmeeting work, search
Linux sites.
William Hubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I have an rh 5.2 machine and a windows 98 machine. I have an ADSL
> connection to the internet with a static ip address. I am interested in
> setting things up so that both machines have full access to the internet.
>
> I have been using ip masquerade on the linux machine, and it sortof works.
> There are things that I want to do on the windows box (netmeeting and icq
> for example) which will not work correctly when it is going through the
> linux machine running masquerade.
>
> Are there ways to set up ip masquerade to handle these programs? Or, are
> there alternatives to ip masquerade that will allow both machines to have
> access to the internet?
>
> I don't get a chance to read newsgroups often, so please send responses to
> me via email as well as posting them.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> William
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.config
Subject: Re: Help: domain propagation
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:05:34 -0700
Hello,
You can check your domain setting in Internic database, just go to
http://www.networksolutions.com. Then you can go to 'Make changes' section
and try to enter your domain name there and see if it comes up. If it does,
then internic database is ok, but you still need DNS settings.
As far as DNS, why don't you set your own dns server? You can setup primary
on your Linux box and use ISP as a secondary (also you can use
http://soa.granitecanyon.com for secondary).
I've tried your IP address and it's not comming with anything in browser and
in nslookup. Do you have apache setup?
Good luck!
Scientia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Help: domain propagation
>
> Hello
>
> I have got a domain but after several days it does not work yet.
> The domain is not seen by any browser.
> I e-mailed many times both to my provider (where my DNS and my IP are)
> and to the nic office, and they tell me that all is ok and I need
> only to wait the "domain propagation".
> Does it really take so long?
>
> But I worry also for another reason: my provider gave me an IP address
> for my virtual domain, but it is not recognized if I browse:
> http://216.121.32.8 (that is my IP)
>
> Why?! It should be seen by any browser in the world,
> as it is independent from the DNS!
> How can be there a "propagation" on it?
>
> In any case, about the DNS "propagation", I am afraid that there may
> be some mistakes, as too many days have passed.
>
> So here are more questions.
> I registered the two nameservers (DNS)
> for my domain with LOWER CASE characters, that is ns.providername.com
> while I see that usually UPPER CASE characters are needed,
> that is NS.PROVIDERNAME.COM
> May it make a difference? Is there a case sensitivity?!
> However, is really the nameserver name important?
> I guess that the number 209.182... is important,
> and I do not know if the nameserver ns.providername.com
> is really important for the routing to work.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Diego
> You can also e-mail to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.misc,alt.binaries.warez.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.protocols.smb,aus.computers.linux
Subject: ALERT! Do not use stock RedHat 6.0 kernels with SMBFS!
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:24:07 GMT
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:31:45 -0400
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Do not use stock RedHat 6.0 kernels with SMBFS!
Ok... I reported this problem to RedHat several days
ago, so they have had at least a small chance to look it over and
be ready for this announcement. I'm continuing to hear complaints
about corrupted timestamps on smbfs mounts so this word needs to
get out.
Synopsis:
Do NOT use the stock RedHat kernels from RedHat 6.0 if
you are using SMBFS with Windows NT, Windows 2000, or Windows 98.
These kernels were incorrectly compiled with a configuration
option, the Windows 95 bug workaround, that will cause corruption
of timestamp information on shares mounted from any of those other
systems.
Details:
I'm the maintainer of smbmount in the Samba package.
Lately I've noticed a significant increase in reports of a
specific, very peculiar, problem with smbfs where timestamps
of files are corrupted. These occur on Windows NT, Windows
2000, and Windows 98 shares. The problem occurs whenever
the Windows 95 Bug Workaround is enabled in kernel builds
and those kernels are then used to mount shares from
something other than Windows 95.
Inspection of the kernel source packages on the
RedHat 6.0 source disk revealed that the stock x86 and
sparc kernels are all being built with this option enabled.
Since this is the first RedHat build with the 2.2.x kernels
and, subsequently, the first build with the Samba version of
smbmount, this problem is only just recently becoming
chronic. Up until now, people wishing to use the 2.2.x
kernels with the newer smbfs module and the newer smbmount
would have to build their own. Often, they would not
include this option and the problem would not occur. Now,
with this option enabled in stock kernels, the complaint
level is rising.
] # grep SMB_WIN95 *.config
] kernel-2.2-i386-BOOT.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-i386-smp.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-i386.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-i586-smp.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-i586.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-i686-smp.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-i686.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-sparc-smp.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-sparc.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-sparc64-smp.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
] kernel-2.2-sparc64.config:CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y
The Windows 95 Bug Workaround forces "ON" some protocol
hacks to work around bugs in Windows 95. The code for this hack
is in the kernel even if this option is disabled. If the option
is disabled, the bug workaround is "OFF" by default but can be
enabled with a mount time option. If the Windows 95 Bug Workaround
is enabled when the kernel is compiled, this code is forced "ON"
with no way to disable it. This code is strictly for Windows 95
shares and causes havoc with Windows NT, Windows 2000, and Windows 98
shares. Specifically, it causes the bytes in the file timestamps to
be reversed. The results in timestamps which appear to be garbage.
Attempts to use timestamp dependent utilities (such as Make) result
in random acts of terrorism and errors.
The Windows 95 Bug Workaround should be enabled in the
kernel build IF AND ONLY IF all of the shares which will be mounted
by smbfs are only and will only ever be from Windows 95 systems.
If there is any chance that a share from a Windows NT, Windows 2000,
or Windows 98 system may be mounted by smbfs, the Windows 95 Bug
Workaround option in the kernel build MUST NOT BE ENABLED!
Fix:
Anyone using RedHat 6.0 with smbfs must recompile and
reinstall
their kernels with the Windows 95 Bug Workaround disabled. Hopefully,
RedHat will make kernel RPMs available shortly with the fix
incorporated.
Disclaimer:
This is a known problem in RedHat 6.0. It may also be a
problem
in other distributions. I have not determined the extent of the
problem
in other distributions and investigation is continuing. If you are
using another distribution, other than RedHat 6.0, and are
experiencing this problem with their stock kernels, please contact me
and them.
This problem may also have been present with the SMBFS module
and smbmount program from the 2.0 kernels. Since I do not maintain
that version of smbmount, I'm unaware if the problem existed in those
earlier versions or not.
-
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
------------------------------
From: shyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: IP address binding to interface device ..
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:58:52 +0200
Hello,
I am trying to understand why does the internet address bind to the
interface in IP suite of protocols. In my limited knowledge , other
protocols do not have this limitation.
For eg., in a machine with dual ethernets , it is imperative that they
have different ip addresses. Thus , you cannot have load sharing or
failover capabilities between the connected machines in spite of the
having more than one physical network.
Or is it that there are tools that beat this and I am ignorant of
this ;-(
Anybody care to educate me!
Thanks & Bye
shyam
------------------------------
From: poodah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: TCP options?
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:20:53 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
QuestionExchange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This answer is courtesy of an expert from QuestionExchange]
>
> There is a point by point overview of the what's implemented
> and what's missing in the kernel source. The file you
> should look at is net/ipv4/tcp.c in the kernel source tree.
> You do NOT need to read the C source. Just scroll down
> until you hit the comments about RFC's.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> --
> QuestionExchange, the Knowledge Marketplace.
> http://www.questionexchange.com
>
>
Thanks, but I had already done that. The comments refer to RFC 1122, a
standard written in 1989. Am I to presume that Linux TCP contains none
of the extensions/enhancements of more recent RFCs such as 2018, 2001,
1323, 1144, 1191?
--
Fred Tims [Critical Technologies Inc.]
http://www.nonstop.net
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Can't establish a ppp connection over a modem.
Date: 24 Jun 1999 14:45:01 -0500
Allyn Dimock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: In trying to activate "ppp0" or "ppp1" from netcfg with i/o to /dev/modem:
: netcfg says "active" but doesn't dial out. I get the following
: messages in /var/log/messages
: Jun 24 10:31:47 localhost ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp1 on /dev/modem at 115200
: Jun 24 10:31:47 localhost pppd[782]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
: Jun 24 10:31:47 localhost pppd[782]: tcgetattr: Input/output error(5)
: Jun 24 10:31:48 localhost pppd[782]: Exit.
The tcgetattr means that pppd failed to get the device file attributes.
The reason is invariably that another process is using the same IRQ that
is configured for the modem device file. Linux doesn't share IRQs.
Try "cat /proc/interrupts" to find out which IRQs are in use. You'll have
to rejumper/configure the modem for another IRQ and configure the device
file for it, or if a second device is using the IRQ, rejumper/configure
the other device to use another IRQ, or if the other process is using
the modem too, then you'll need to get rid of it before pppd can use the
modem.
: I am using Red Hat 5.2 on a Fujitsu C350 with the modem on a Xircom card.
: This configuration was working for 5 months.
And then you did what? :)
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Governments should be changed like diapers - often and for the
* same reason. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tennent)
Subject: Re: PCI network card problem (RealTek 8029)
Date: 24 Jun 1999 20:13:17 GMT
Reply-To: rdt(a)cs.queensu.ca
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:48:57 +0200, Nickolai Sergienko wrote:
>
>I've just got a new Compaq Presario computer with PCI network card,
>which is NE2000 compatible (RealTek 8029 RTL). Computer came with
>preinstalled Windows 98.
>Network card works wel under Win98 and uses (reported by Windows)
>io=0x1000 irq=11.
>I've installed RedHat 6.0 on this machine, and everything went perfect,
>except that network interface doesn't work. ne2k-pci module loads with
>the warnig message: "PCI BIOS assigned IRQ=0 to the device RealTek 8029
>RTL, use PCI BIOS setup to assign appropriate IRQ level", and the kernel
>reports "SCCIADDRFLAG: Resource currently unavailable
>Network unreacheble".
>ifconfig etho gives reasonable output.
>
Have you specified options for the ne2k-pci module in /etc/conf.modules?
You can specify the interface, irq and io address there.
Bob T.
------------------------------
From: Greg Yantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: LAN connectivity problem
Date: 24 Jun 1999 17:05:21 -0400
Richrj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can ping my eth0 card but can't ping out to any other machines on my LAN.
> I am running dualboot on my Linux machine. When I boot to windows instead
> of Linux, I can see the other machine on my network fine.
OK, sounds like your hardware is fine. So you have a configuration
problem of some kind.
> ethernet card = D-Link-220P
> LAN = 2 pc's directly connected via UTP
If you can talk to the other machine in Windows, you must be using a
crossover cable. Good.
> IP address = 192.168.0.1
> network = 192.168.0.0
> broadcast = 192.168.0.255
> subnet = 255.255.255.0
Hmmm. You only mention one IP address. What's the IP address of the
other machine?
> DESTINATION GATEWAY GENMASK FLAGS METRIC REF USE IFACE
>
> localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 2 eth0
> loopnet * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
> default test.linux.com 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 13 eth0
Your default route just looks wrong. What are the hosnames you're using
for your machines? Posting the output of "route -n" as well as "route"
might shed some light on this situation.
> ERROR MESSAGE FROM DMESG:
> eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x43, ISR=0x2, t=800
> ARP: arp called for own IP address
What's in /etc/hosts and /etc/networks?
Is your gateway host (test.linux.com?? huh?) the local host? Are your
remote host and local host set up to use the same IP address? From the
error message, I have a feeling your problem is the latter.
-Greg
------------------------------
From: "change" <changeme@changeme>
Subject: Re: IP adress for small network that needs internet access
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:03:41 -0500
If your ISP will only assign you one IP address, use the 192.168.0.n
addresses for your local network using the existing box as the gateway for
the other box(es).
HTH
Michael Black
Nevyn wrote in message <7krner$6ir$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>ok....got one computer....may get another soon.....i'll want to make a
>network of the 2 of them....mostly cos i like to fiddle.....if i set up my
>SuSE 6 box as if i have the network already as far as possible......what
>would be a good IP adress range to give the computer considering i go on
the
>internet with it....or does ot not matter?
>
>*************************************
>** "yurtta sula cihanda sula" **
>*************************************
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 24 Jun 1999 17:02:09 -0400
>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Glebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
Wring question. The question should be:
Why C++ ?
-- Stefan
------------------------------
From: Erik-Jan Sinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ipchains and ip port forwarding...
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:23:57 +0000
Hi Steve,
For kernel 2.2.x you have to download "ipmasqadm" and for each port you
want to forward insert two rules similar like these ones in your
firewall script :
ipchains -I forward -p tcp -s <IP-ADDRESS-INTERNAL-MACHINE>/32 80 -j
MASQ
ipmasqadm portfw -a -p tcp -L <IP-ADDRESS-FIREWALL> 80 -R
<IP-ADDRESS-INTERNAL-MACHINE> 80
Goodluck!
Erik
Steve Bradshaw wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> I'm using Redhat 6.0 and have configured it for IP masquerade and it's
> seems to be working fine.
>
> Now what I need to do is set up port forwarding so that port 80
> connections to the firewall go to one internal host while port 110 and
> 143 connections go to another.
>
> I'm using IPchains and have been through plenty of readme files/websites
> and have read HOWTOs until they were coming out of my ears but I'm still
> in the dark on this count.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Steve.
>
> PS, please BCC me into any posted reply as I don't get to newsgroups as
> often as I would like.
> My real email address is steve_AT_mirkwood_DOT_clara_DOT_net
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:11:46 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ralph Glebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[&<]
>
> yes. the C part is very mature. the code produced is solid.
>
> the C++ standard keeps changing. for example, i had to recode a lot
> of my applications in my transition from gcc-2.7.2.* to egcs. the
> egcs libstdc++ seems highly volatile. i'd rather keep as little
> dependent upon it as possible. at least, now, if C++ libs break, i
> can at least recompile what i have without the catastrophe of
> missing/broken libc.
The C++ standard is no longer changing, period. The compilers and
library implementations are changing because they are still catching up,
but the standard has been finished for over a year.
Please be careful not to fud.
Jack
[&<]
> --
> johan kullstam
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail - user unknow
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:38:09 -0400
sendmail is not a local mail delivery agent!
Another program handles actually putting mail in mailboxes.
My local ilevery program is called deliver.
Chick the end of /etc/sendmail.conf for what sendmail is passing
the mail to for local delivery and check for man pages/docs on
your local delivery program.
MicroNg wrote:
>
> Hi they, some Q again
>
> I'm using RH5.2 , I can't use senmail etc to send mail to any user - user
> xxx unknow, either with or without FQD in the address,, anyone help please
> ?
>
> thank in advance
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Ng Weei Peng Esq.
> Software R&D Executive
> :> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> No junk mail please, Thank you, if have any, send to :
> :< [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
Come Visit Our Website
http://www.freeyellow.com/members/creative-services
Please Visit Our Sponsers (We get paid per visit)
------------------------------
From: Scientia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.sco.misc,
Subject: Help: domain propagation
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:05:57 -0700
Help: domain propagation
Hello
I have got a domain but after several days it does not work yet.
The domain is not seen by any browser.
I e-mailed many times both to my provider (where my DNS and my IP are)
and to the nic office, and they tell me that all is ok and I need
only to wait the "domain propagation".
Does it really take so long?
But I worry also for another reason: my provider gave me an IP address
for my virtual domain, but it is not recognized if I browse:
http://216.121.32.8 (that is my IP)
Why?! It should be seen by any browser in the world,
as it is independent from the DNS!
How can be there a "propagation" on it?
In any case, about the DNS "propagation", I am afraid that there may
be some mistakes, as too many days have passed.
So here are more questions.
I registered the two nameservers (DNS)
for my domain with LOWER CASE characters, that is ns.providername.com
while I see that usually UPPER CASE characters are needed,
that is NS.PROVIDERNAME.COM
May it make a difference? Is there a case sensitivity?!
However, is really the nameserver name important?
I guess that the number 209.182... is important,
and I do not know if the nameserver ns.providername.com
is really important for the routing to work.
Thanks!
Diego
You can also e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Changing Monitors in X?????
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:54:36 GMT
I just got a monitor for my Linux box, before that I was just connecting one
of my other monitors when I needed to use it. The new monitor is a older
14" I got for really cheap, mainly just so I don't have to disconnect my
other one. I know that it works at 800 x 600 32 bit fine, since I hooked it
up to a Win box, but I can't seem to get it to work with linux. Currently
when I run X I get three overlapping and narrow sceens. When I orginally
install RH6 I picked the other monitor I was using at the time, is there
anyway to change this without reinstalling?
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: LAN connectivity problem
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:15:05 -0700
Can you include output of ifconfig -a and netstat -rn. Your routing table
does not make any sence, because it displays network names instead of
addresses. If you use netstat -rn, then we can see IP numbers and help you.
Good luck!
Richrj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ku11k$64s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> NEED HELP:
>
> I can ping my eth0 card but can't ping out to any other machines on my
LAN.
> I am running dualboot on my Linux machine. When I boot to windows
instead
> of Linux, I can see the other machine on my network fine.
>
> SPECIFICATIONS:
>
> ethernet card = D-Link-220P
> LAN = 2 pc's directly connected via UTP
>
> IP address = 192.168.0.1
> network = 192.168.0.0
> broadcast = 192.168.0.255
> subnet = 255.255.255.0
>
> ROUTE TABLE:
>
> DESTINATION GATEWAY GENMASK FLAGS METRIC REF USE IFACE
>
> localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 2 eth0
> loopnet * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
> default test.linux.com 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 13 eth0
>
>
> ERROR MESSAGE FROM DMESG:
>
> eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x43, ISR=0x2, t=800
> ARP: arp called for own IP address
>
> Can anyone help??????
>
> thanks,
>
> Rich
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows95 box -> Linux Box (Static IP) -> Intranet -> Internet?
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:18:34 -0700
Hello,
Check the ip_masq howto:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
Good luck!
Chris Cosentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ktjci$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Folks,
>
> I have 1 static IP line into my office. I have a linux box and a win95
> box and a hub. I want to have the Linux Box connected to the static IP on
> eth0, and connected to the hub on eth1. And I want to have the Win95 box
> connected to the hub.
>
> What I need is for the Win95 box to be able to go through the Linux
box
> and see the intranet, and also the internet (via proxies off of other
> servers on the intranet).
>
> But how do I get the win95 box to see the outside world? It can see
the
> linux box, but that's it. DO I need to do some kind of IP forwarding on
the
> linux box so packets think they are going to the linux box but actually go
> to the windows box? I'm a little lost.
>
> Where's a good place to start to find info on this?
>
> Thanks much,
> -Chris
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Chris Seaton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
ahn.tech.linux,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Question
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:10:38 -0500
I'm looking for Penguin wallpaper for my Linux desktop. I can't find
any wallpaper based on tux. Anyone know where to find some???
Chris Seaton
email me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Big Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: PPP problem
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:09:58 -0400
I changed my ppp0 configuration with netcfg so that
it is activated at boot (what's wrong with that anyway?)
Now I cannot get to the X-window.
At boot it starts everything but then it gets to:
Setting modem port parameters:
/dev/ttyS1: device or resource busy
/dev/ttyS1: device or resource busy
/dev/ttyS1: device or resource busy
and hangs........
What should I do now? I'm not the one who installed this
Linux into the machine (Toshiba laptop 415CS). As far as
I can tell the only place where I can interrupt the startup
is when it gives the LILO boot: prompt.
But what should I do there and what should I change?
I love Linux. Really. Please help resuscitate this baby!!
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Need advice on modem
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:01:50 -0400
Ummm... 100mhz 486? Are you sure?
Aamer Sachedina wrote:
> Hello Folks:
>
> I have a 486 100Mhz box... It's a bit old but it does what I need.
> I run Linux and Windows.
>
> I need to get a faster modem.. I dropped by the local Computer City and
> all they have are Win Modems! Heck all I want is a Modem with jumpers
> on it so that I can set the COMM port and IRQ to get it to work with
> Linux.. like my 14.4 Boca.
>
> Can you guys recommend me a relatively inexpensive 56K internal modem
> which will work with Linux as well as with Windows. I'd really
> appreciate it.
>
> -Aamer
>
> --
> Aamer Sachedina
> aamers@ca dot ibm dot com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
