Linux-Networking Digest #673, Volume #11         Sat, 26 Jun 99 00:13:36 EDT

Contents:
  Re: I Need Modem Help. (Spider)
  samba with dhcp and two subnets? (eric thompson)
  Re: NFS remote install problems (Jim Smith)
  Re: Help! NFS uid/gid problems ("Scott Simpson")
  Ricochet MODEM in Linxu / Strange TCP-IP problems... (Ali Niknejad)
  Re: Newbie DNS Question ("Michael Faurot")
  Smbmount Broken? (Tracy Johns)
  Re: PPP - Please no ppp how-to's (Bill Unruh)
  host info missing from who's w's last's output (Peter Dobcsanyi)
  Re: PROXY (Don Heffernan)
  Re: bizarre networking problem. ("castor")
  samba and fstab. ("castor")
  reverse name lookup - how 2 in linux?? (Bob)
  Windows-Client for rexecd? (Dierk)
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest 
News (Ochran Industries)
  DSL Internet (Thomas Kochak)
  NFS client mount fails on RH 6.0 -  Newbie Q (Pat Cassidy)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spider)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: I Need Modem Help.
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:10:33 GMT

        Well, I found the answer to the problem. It was in my bios. My
Bios was set for a plug-n-play aware Operating System which Linux
really isn't 100% PNP. I can now use the ISA modem without a problem
in Linux and I can connect to my ISP too.

Thanks,
AC

------------------------------

From: eric thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba with dhcp and two subnets?
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:01:48 -0400

Hi-
    I am having severe problems with samba and getting it to work
correctly.
I am in a large network environment with several subnets all the way out
to class A.  I have two machines in my office one is on one subnet
beginning with 10 and the other is on another subnet begining with 146.
We are forced to use dhcp.
oh the 146 box is win 95 and the other is linux (red hat 6, 2.2.10)
so when I do:
smbclient -L tk421 (which is the linux box) I get :
Added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0
Password:
Domain=[SSPG] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.3]

        Sharename      Type      Comment
        ---------      ----      -------
        foo            Disk      foo
        mp3            Disk      mp3
        tmp            Disk      temporary files
       IPC$           IPC       IPC Service (Why aren't you at your
post?)

        Server               Comment
        ---------            -------
        DLTTST
        TK421                Why aren't you at your post?

        Workgroup            Master
        ---------            -------
        SSPG                 DLTTST

sometimes I get a list of the other machines in the net but sometimes I
don't.  I can't figure it out.
now I can see my windows machine (tk422) and my friend's down the hall
but if I do:
[erict@tk421 /etc]$ nmblookup -B tk421 __SAMBA__
Sending queries to 0.0.0.0
10.70.98.5 __SAMBA__<00>
[erict@tk421 /etc]$ nmblookup -B tk422 '*'
Sending queries to 0.0.0.0
10.70.98.5 *<00>

they both give the IP of the linux machine even though tk422 is the
windows machine on a totally different subnet...
I think my hosts file is messed up. but I can't really use it anyway
since we use dhcp...
then my friends machine:

[erict@tk421 /etc]$ nmblookup -B eduen '*'
Sending queries to 10.70.96.196
name_query failed to find name *

I am tired and confused, and it is friday.  can anyone point me to a
setup using dhcp and two subnets in a network environment that I don't
control.  ie. I don't want to be domain master...

nmblookup -d 2 '*'
gives me only a response from my own machine but If I set the netmask to
0.0.0.0 then I get a whole bunch but still only in my 10.x.x.x subnet
(is that even a subnet? I guess it's a full blown net)

                                                    I have exhausted all
FAQs and setup pages... thanks-

eric


------------------------------

From: Jim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS remote install problems
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:51:03 GMT

Gordon,

thank you for replying. I'm afraid mounting the CD-ROM to others boxes is
not an option. But here are a few details I left out in my previous message:

Exports file seems to be set up correctly and so does daemon mountd. Deamon
nfsd seems to have some problems though. I seemed to have read somewhere
that when executing rpcinfo -p I should see

                            100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
                            100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
                            100005 1 tcp 744 mountd
                            100005 2 udp 744 mountd
                            100005 1 tcp 747 nfsd
                            100005 2 udp 747 nfsd

But when I do, I seem to be missing

                            100005 2 udp 747 nfsd

Syslog looks fine except for:

                            mountd[63]: exports file has anon entries, but
host
                            mountd[63]: has non-private IP address
200.200.200.1!
                            nfsd[68]: Could not bind name to socket
0.0.0.0:2049: A$
                            nfsd[68]: could not make a udp socket
                            nfsd[65]: Unauthorized access by NFS client
200.200.200.9

NOTE:    200.200.200.9 is the IP address of server 2, ie. the one I'm trying
to install Linux on.

Hope you can help... I running out of options here ;-)#

Jim.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Can you mount the CD-ROM to other machines?  If you can mount it to
> other boxes you should have no problem getting the install started (I
> have occasionally gotten errors during the install via nfs mount which
> don't seem to happen with local CD-ROMs).
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Jim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > I'm having trouble installing Linux via remote install.
> >
> > Consider the following:
> > ===============
> >
> > Server 1        Linux 2.0.29 up and running with a mounted CD-ROM
> > Server 2        Installation in progress
> >
> > Problem:
> > ======
> >
> > From Server 2, I'm trying to install Linux via Remote Install, ie from
> > CD-ROM mounted on Server 1. On Server 1, exports file seems to be set
> up
> > correctly and so does deamons mountd and nfsd. When trying to install
> I
> > get the following error message :
> >
> >         nfs_fhget:                getattr error = 13
> >         nfs_read_super:      get root inode failed
> >         mount:                    wrong fs type or bad superblock on
> >
> server1:/cdrom/slackware/slakware
> >
> > Can someone please help.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jim.
> >
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.


------------------------------

From: "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,alt.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Help! NFS uid/gid problems
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:39:34 -0700

> > > I am running Linux as an NFS server and Solaris x86 as an
> > > NFS client.  No matter what I do, the uid's and gid's don't
> > > seem to map correctly, meaning that if I create a file on
> > > the client, it maps as something like nobody4 (65534).  I
> > > tried the map_static entry in the exports file to no avail.
> > >
> > > Any idea what I am doing wrong?  I simply want uid's and gid's
> > > to map equivalently across the systems.

I had the exact same problem on Caldera 2.2. The problem is the following:

1. Your nfsd isn't compiled with NIS support. Get the sources, run the BUILD
script, answer yes when it asks for NIS support. Install.
2. You need to make sure that your root and nobody accounts are in NIS. If
they are in the local password file but not NIS, it won't work.

The above will fix your problem.





------------------------------

From: Ali Niknejad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Ricochet MODEM in Linxu / Strange TCP-IP problems...
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:34:54 -0700

I recently setup a Ricochet MODEM under RH 6 Linux.  Initially, all
seemed well.  I had previously installed an ethernet and ppp phone-line
link so I was sure that everything was set and ready to go.  Also, the
MODEM worked out of the box in windows.

Ricochet modems act like normal modems so setting it up was no different
from a regular ppp connection.  

When all was said and done, ping worked, the communication between the
name server worked so I figured all was well.  Even traceroute worked. 
But my first attempt to actually start a telnet session failed.  I
"tcpdumped" the packets to see what was going on and it seemed as if the
initial synching phase was conducted with no problems but after that the
computers do not seem to be able to communicate.  

Here's ifconfig on my system:  

ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol  
          inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.130  P-t-P:XXX.XXX.XXX.131 
Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:10 

Here's a "netstat -nr"

Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt
Iface
YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY  0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH        0 0         
0 eth0
XXX.XXX.XXX.131 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH        0 0          0
ppp0
YYY.YYY.YYY.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0         
0 eth0
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U         0 0          0
lo
0.0.0.0         XXX.XXX.XXX.131 0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0
ppp0
0.0.0.0         YYY.YYY.YYY.1    0.0.0.0         UG        0 0         
0 eth0


You'll note that the ethernet connection works fine.  I've also disabled
the ethernet connection in order to test out the ppp connection alone
but it still does not work.

I'm attaching a verbose snooped session from the host
"workinghost.edu".  I tried to "telnet workinghost.edu 7" (the echo
port).

Here is the tcpdump on linux:

12:30:25.141822 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1027 > YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo: P
753784223:753784\
226(3) ack 3168504463 win 32120 <nop,nop,timestamp 145324 750705350>
(DF)
12:30:35.683116 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1024 > DNS.DNS.DNS.DNS.domain: 33786+
(41)
12:30:36.151800 DNS.DNS.DNS.DNS.domain > XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1024: 33786
1/3/9 (286\
) (DF)
12:30:36.162509 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1028 > YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo: S
964924841:964924\
841(0) win 32120 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 146426 0,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
12:30:36.461793 YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo > XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1028: S
3193812774:31938\
12774(0) ack 964924842 win 10136 <nop,nop,timestamp 750725553
146426,nop,wscale\
 0,mss 1460> (DF)
12:30:36.471835 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1028 > YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo: . ack 1 win
32120 \
<nop,nop,timestamp 146457 750725553> (DF)
12:30:37.844476 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1028 > YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo: P 1:3(2)
ack 1 win\
 32120 <nop,nop,timestamp 146594 750725553> (DF)
12:30:40.841802 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1028 > YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo: P 1:3(2)
ack 1 win\
 32120 <nop,nop,timestamp 146894 750725553> (DF)
12:30:41.673452 XXX.XXX.XXX.130.1028 > YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY.echo: FP 3:8(5)
ack 1 wi\
n 32120 <nop,nop,timestamp 146977 750725553> (DF)



Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Please reply through netmail.  By the way, I am by no means a TCP/IP or
network specialist.


Ali

------------------------------

From: "Michael Faurot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie DNS Question
Date: 26 Jun 1999 00:32:44 GMT

Shonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: This may sound stupid, but under DNS what server do I get the forwarders
: to?  A root server.  My network only has one primary and one secondary
: DNS?

You don't necessarily need to use forwarders at all.  But should you
wish to, you might set these in your named.conf file to point to the
DNS servers run by your ISP.  In this way, you can take advantage of
the cache on the ISP's DNS servers and possibly get quicker response
since there should be very few hops between you and the ISP's DNS
servers.

-- 
==============================================================================
 Michael | mfaurot  | Art is Nature speeded up and God slowed down.
 Faurot  | atww.org |           -- Chazal

------------------------------

From: Tracy Johns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Smbmount Broken?
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:36:23 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi All,

    I am posting  this message in desperation. I have recently loaded
Slackware 4.0, and Redhat 6.0 on separate machines. I also have
Slackware 3.5 on another machine. The last version of smbmount that I
could get to work is 2.0.2, and I have not been successful with later
versions.

    I need to mount a NT share to my Linux box(s). The NT share is
//Ogden-prcl-nts2/eed. My login name is TRACY_J my password is ****, my
workgroup is EED_WORKGROUP, my netbios (machine) name is OGD_JOHNST, the
NT address is 10.3.1.22. I can mount this share using smbmount 2.0.2,
running on Slackware kernel ver 2.0.34. I can not mount this same share
under Red Hat 6.0 (smbmount 2.0.3) or Slackware 4.0 (smbmount 2.0.3) or
Slackware 3.5 (smbmount 2.0.3).

    I have checked the man pages, and used the syntax listed, and read
the applicable HOWTO's. I have searched deja-news for any sign of an
answer, but have found none. The mount point DOES exist on the target
machine.

    I made sure that /etc/smb.conf was set up, and I have run testparm
successfully. I have tried it with the dns (using the dns address)
enabled, and without.

I went through a lot of trials, but here is the command that I think
that I used with ver. 2.0.3:
smbmount //OGDEN-PRCL-NTS2/EED -c 'mount /eed' -U TRACY_J -n OGD_JOHNST
-I 10.3.1.22 -d 5

Here is what smbmount says: - some irrelevant sections cut out for
brevity.

=======================================================================================================

Client started (version 2.0.3)
Initialising global parameters
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/smb.conf"
Processing section "[global]"
doing parameter workgroup = EED_Workgroup
doing parameter server string = Samba Server
doing parameter hosts allow = 10.3
doing parameter load printers = yes
doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba.%m
doing parameter max log size = 50
doing parameter security = user
doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY
doing parameter local master = no
doing parameter os level = 33
doing parameter dns proxy = no
pm_process() returned Yes
load_client_codepage: loading codepage 850.
Derived broadcast address 10.3.1.255
Added interface ip=10.3.1.51 bcast=10.3.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Opening sockets
resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name OGDEN-PRCL-NTS2<0x20>
getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 10.3.1.22 OGDEN-PRCL-NTS2
Connecting to 10.3.1.22 at port 139
Connected
Sent session request
<cut>
max mux 50
max vcs 1
max raw 65536
capabilities 0x43fd
Sec mode 12803
max xmt 4356
Got 8 byte crypt key
Chose protocol [NT LM 0.12]
Server time is Fri Jun 25 16:05:56 1999
Timezone is UTC-6.0
size=35
<cut>
Session setup failed for username=TRACY_J myname=OGD-JOHNST
destname=OGDEN-PRCL-NTS2   ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.)
You might find the -U, -W or -n options useful
Sometimes you have to use `-n USERNAME' (particularly with OS/2)
Some servers also insist on uppercase-only passwords

=============================================================================

    I get a prompt for a password, but each time the attempt to mount
the share fails. I have tried upper case (yes, I'm sure that it is the
correct password), lower case, with no difference. I have also tried the
'-W' option, with no difference. I have used all caps for the machine
name, caps for the first letter (like W95 browse listing), to no avail.
I have added a lmhosts file with the NT address - didn't help.

    Is there someone, who can tell me what I am doing wrong? - I am
stumped! - This can't be that hard, can it?

Thanks,
Tracy Johns
([EMAIL PROTECTED])





------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Subject: Re: PPP - Please no ppp how-to's
Date: 25 Jun 1999 23:06:28 GMT

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> lyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>Try PPP-UP located on our site at
>http://www.thecomputergallery.com/redhat/ppp.shtml
>I guarantee you it is very very easy to set up.

Unfortunately as with so many of those scripts, it assumes certain
things about how the remote side authenticates. If your isp happens to
use that technique the script will work fine. If not, it will not work.
And every single ISP seems to delight in finding new ways to
authenticate. 

Too see the problems, look at 
axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
for a step by step procedure for finding out how your ISP authenticates
and then giving them what they need. 

Note also that the official serial ports are /dev/ttyS0 to /dev/ttyS3
nnot cua0 to cua3. The latter will fail with the newer kernels.

The script also replaces your hosts file, which could be nasty if you
happen to have a lan, or have defined a bunch of hosts names for
yourself.
Moreover it replaces the hosts file evey time it dials in.

In ppp-down it does the same thing as all of the other down scripts do,
and that is try to read /var/run/ppp0.pid. Unfortunately that file is
readable only by root. Not very useful unless you are root. FAr more
useful is 
killall pppd



------------------------------

From: Peter Dobcsanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: host info missing from who's w's last's output
Date: 26 Jun 1999 02:05:38 GMT

Hi,

After I moved from Debian 'slink' to 'potato' I have noticed that the
host information from the output of 'w', 'who' and 'last' is gone. For
example 'who' gives

    $ who
    peter    :0       Jun 23 16:44
    peter    pts/0    Jun 23 16:44 (:0.0)
    peter    pts/1    Jun 23 16:45

but the last line represents a remote login. I have never had this
problem before.

I could not figure out what's the problem. Could somebody help me with
this?

Thanks
    Peter


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Heffernan)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PROXY
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:54:47 GMT

On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:42:32 GMT, Jim Noeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Look at /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade on your linux box (assuming
>you installed the HOWTO documentation. This is one way to accomplish
>what you want. The other is to use a proxy server (squid is one that is
>available for linux).
>
Squid is good for http.  Socks5 covers some other protocols including
ICQ and AOL (I know, I know, but my daughter insists).

Don Heffernan

------------------------------

From: "castor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bizarre networking problem.
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:13:45 +1000

Thanks J�r�me, I'm going to try your suggestion. I thought it was my ISP too
until I tried game servers outside my ISP's. It still could be in some
bizarre conspiracy theory of them trying to ban me from all game servers 10
minutes after I lose carrier :)

-c.


J�r�me PETAZZONI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Mike Somerville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > game servers and ICQ and the like use UDP ports to communicate.  'cuz
UDP is
> > connectionless it gives the speed that games and the like require to
work.
> well, to be precise, UDP does not care with the order of packets, nor
> whether they arrive two times, they can even not reach the target host
> at all... UDP does not care all the verifications and checking that TCP
does,
> and among others it doesn not have to wait for the packet number 12 to
> arrive before processing packets 13 and above - that's why game protocols
> better use UDP, along with their own error checking.
>
> > I would think that pinging would work 'cuz ipmasquirading supports ICMP
> > requests (to the best of my knowedge at least)
> correct, if it is activated a kernel compilation.
>
> > > > When I get disconnected from my ISP and reconnect straight away, I
find
> > > > I cannot connect to any game servers for about 5-10 minutes.
> well that may be a problem on server side : it thinks you are already
> connected and refuses to reconnect you as long as you have not timed out
> the first session.
>
> > > > it would have started to work. If I disconnect manually, this
problem
> > > > doesn't happen.
> confirms my 1st tought.
>
> > > > to do with the ISP, there's a few more things I should say. Firstly,
it
> > > > never happened when I connected direct with the Windows box.
Secondly,
> > if I
> > > > reset the Linux box and then reconnect, it's instantly fine and
working.
> okay, so forget what I told before (it remains true for bnet servers), it
> has something to do with masquerading session timers.
> you may try to reset them by deleting and re-adding the masquerading rule.
>



------------------------------

From: "castor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba and fstab.
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:18:38 +1000

Can someone please tell me how to mount Samba shares in /etc/fstab? Or fix
the following problem?
I have a script file which mounts some Windows 98 partitions with smbmount.
If I put this file in my /etc/rc.d/boot.local, or even if I put the whole
thing manually with full paths in there, it doesn't work. The thing scrolls
off way too fast for me to read properly (can someone tell me how to pause?
:). It says something about service not being available[?] This happens
whether my Windows box has finished booting up or not. As soon as I log on
and run the script, the partitions mount fine.

Will the problem persist if I mount the partitions in fstab?

-c.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,alt.os.linux
Subject: reverse name lookup - how 2 in linux??
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:06:48 GMT

how do you get the system name from an ip address?

iow : reverse dns lookup


with windows you can ping -a;

what about unix?
isn't there a separate command?

obviously, i've already man'd ping, & it's not there.

tia - bg
________________________________________________
Definition of Windows 95:

A 32 bit upgrade to 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that
doesn't like 1 bit of competition. 


------------------------------

From: Dierk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Windows-Client for rexecd?
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:01:59 +0200

Hi,

Is there any Windows-Client for rexecd out there? Does anyone know such
a program?
Or is someone willing to program such a Client?

Dierk


------------------------------

From: Ochran Industries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft 
Retest News
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:52:38 +1000

On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, J. Maynard Gelinas wrote:
<snip>
> 
>     And I don't see Rob Malda complaining about the poor performance
> of his dual-CPU x86 box running Linux and serving Slashdot to a
> _large_ audience.  Do you honestly think NT would provide better
> uptime and throughput than Linux for that task?  
> 

I can just see that - "I've got this great website that basically has
everything to do with everything that is good about linux, but have
decided to run it on an NT boxen."

> 
> 

-- 
westyX
It's not that i am a cannibal, it's just that human flesh is so tasty.
I believe in preemptive righting of wrongs.
Babylon 5 - Death to all unbelievers
Home grown and better than the bought ones.


------------------------------

From: Thomas Kochak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DSL Internet
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:12:34 -0500

Can anyone tell me how to get some info on setting up DSL in linux?


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pat Cassidy)
Subject: NFS client mount fails on RH 6.0 -  Newbie Q
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:08:26 -0400

I'm having no success mounting anything NFS from a client on RedHat 6.0. 
The only thing that happens is I hear the hard drive (or CDROM, depending 
on what I'm trying to mount) access on the server, then the client 
returns the error message "permission denied." I tried to do a NFS 
install onto one machine and had the same thing happen. The CDROM on 
the server spun up, but then the install program informed me that the 
server had denied permission.

I'm VERY new, just started learning it last week. I've picked up a few 
Linux books and RedHat Linux 6.0. I've got a couple of Linux machines and 
a few Win 95/98 machines on a small net. 

What I have working:
-TCP/IP set up well enough that I've got Samba working ok on the Linux 
machines. 
-hosts files set up so that I can ping all machines by name.
-users are set up the same on all machines
-exports file set up per a couple of the books I've got. I use exportfs -
a after changing the exports file. I've tried a few different syntaxes in 
the exports file, including:
/tmp/test bandit(rw)
 and 
/tmp/test 192.168.1.0/24(rw)

(I'm using 192.168.1.0-255 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0)

As far as I can tell the required deamons are running on the server. I 
can stop and start the service from the command line successfully.

Is there anything obvious I could be doing wrong? I've got maybe 5 books 
here, and can't see anything in them.

Thanks,
Pat Cassidy


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to