Linux-Networking Digest #692, Volume #11 Sun, 27 Jun 99 13:13:37 EDT
Contents:
Re: Administrative accounts (mist)
Re: /etc/passwd or what else? ("Carl R. Friend")
Re: Connecting 3 pcs (mist)
Re: DNS setup problem (mist)
Re: Re: problems with prodigy and linux (Edward Elliott)
Re: If I had a gun.... (Frank Hahn)
Re: Why not C++ (NF Stevens)
Re: Need help sending files win to unix (Monte Phillips)
Re: Linux and DSL ("Richi")
Re: PPP trouble with SuSE 6.1 (John)
bootpd in redhat 6.0? (Bill Comisky)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest
News (Anthony Ord)
Re: Local network setup help !! (Frank Hahn)
Re: LinkSys NIC LNE100TX: Anybody have any problems with this card? - Thanks (Lewis)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Administrative accounts
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:49:54 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Where can I find this info about sudo?
>
<URL:http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/>
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: "Carl R. Friend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: /etc/passwd or what else?
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:56:39 -0400
Marc Mutz wrote:
>
> [With NIS] you have the bottleneck of the ypserv. Maybe shadow
> passwords are what you want.
No, shadow passwords won't do the chap any good at all because
the authenticator (login, in this case) will have to iterate over
the /etc/passwd file to find the username entry before going to the
shadow file for the password. With 280,000 entries in there, that
will take a _long_ time.
In this case, the "hit" of bottlenecking at the ypserv process
is preferable to taking the time to read the entire (worst case)
/etc/passwd file (and shadow). At least the NIS stuff is in a hashed
database instead of a flat file.
LDAP accessed through PAM might be another option, and with that
you can get a variety of backend database types. I have not tried
that option. though, so I'm speculating.
NIS-controlled authentication is transparent to the login process
and will work with utilities like POP and FTP without problem.
There are other, rather substantial, issues with a system with
that many IDs, not the least of which is that UNIX filesystems get
rather cranky of you put too many entries in one directory (think
/home and /var/spool/mail for starters), but that's a different
kettle of fish.
Cheers.
--
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~crfriend/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connecting 3 pcs
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:54:18 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Hi,
>
>I try to connect 2 pcs, but it doesn't work. Here is a short description
>of what I did:
>
>PC1: eth1: 192.168.0.1
>PC2: eth0: 192.168.0.2
>PC3: eth0: 192.168.0.3
>
>On PC1:
>ifconfig eth1 192.168.0.1 broadcast 192.168.0.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth1
>On PC2:
>ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.2 broadcast 192.168.0.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
>On PC3:
>ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.3 ... (the rest same as on PC2)
>
That seems to be fine.
>I don't have to set a default gateway, do I ?
You would need to for masquerading. The default gateway would have to be
set on pcs 2 and 3 to the ip of pc 1. For the LAN, it shouldn't be a
factor.
Do the cards definitely work?
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS setup problem
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:51:46 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Harry Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Hi
>
>I hope someone can point me in the right direction. I have two PC's
>networked at home 1 running Mandrake 6.0 the other Win95. the 95 PC
>doesn't need to connect through my Linux PC to the Internet.
>
>I have in my resolv.conf file
>domain one.net.au
>search one.net.au
You should have either one of domain or search, but not both. I don't
think it matters too much which one.
Removing one might fix your duplicates problem.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: Edward Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: problems with prodigy and linux
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:49:49 -0700
Mircea wrote:
> Select "PAP" and let the program do its trick.
Thanks dude. I waded through almost every page on Prodigy's web site
trying to find info about their server setup (including whether they
were using PAP or CHAP) and couldn't find a damn thing. The tech support
line was no better, their people are trained to read from a script with
useless info like "Click the Start button and go to the Control Panel...".
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: If I had a gun....
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:44:18 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:31:41 -0500, James R. Barnett, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Okay, I am sure some of you have seen my posts in the past weeks. I am
>at my wits' end trying to set up a 2 machine network. Many of you have
>tried to help and I appreciate it, but nothing has worked so far. I have
>installed Win98 on both machines to ensure that the Ethernet Card,
>cables and hub were all functional. It worked in about 15 minutes. I
>bought the Book 'Linux Network Toolkit and followed the first two
>chapters exactly (which setup a Samba Server with windows client). I
>still cannot ping between the machines. The network cards went in fine
>during the Linux install. The modules loaded correctly with the
>autoprobe. cat proc/interrupts and cat proc/ioports both show the
>ethernet card is using the expected resources. ifconfig shows that eth0
>is up and running. My routing tables match exactly what is in the book.
>
For one thing, forget about Samba until you get the networking part
between the two computers working.
There is an article in an old issue of The Linux Gazette that may be
useful. The issue number is 20 I believe. It was in the Weekend
Mechanic section. The IP address is http://www.linuxgazette.com.
If I were you, I would recompile a new kernel with support for your
card compiled in and forget the modules untill it works. Then try
and go back to a module if you want. It seems to make no sense to
me to use a module when basically, the module will be installed
constantly.
On startup, here is the output of the section on where my network
card is found:
================================================
ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300: 00 40 05 48 67 ee
eth0: NE2000 found at 0x300, using IRQ 10.
================================================
What networking protocol is installed on the Windows machine? Make
sure TCP/IP is bound to your network card in MS WIndows.
If you can't ping between machines then you have more basic problems.
Make sure both machine have a hosts file with the names and IP address
for all machines on your network. On Linux, this is the /etc/hosts
file. On the windows machine, this hosts file goes in the C:\windows
directory.
This file looks something like this:
192.168.100.10 machinename1@domain machinename1
192.168.100.11 machinename2@domain machinename2
The ifconfig -a output on the Linux machine looks something like this:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:5886 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:5886 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:48:67:EE
inet addr:192.168.100.10 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:12353 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:13658 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
sl0 Link encap:Serial Line IP
inet addr:192.168.100.10 P-t-P:192.168.100.22 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
Ignore the sl0 device, it is there for the diald program.
Double check the setup on the Windows machine again.
Here is a copy of my /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 file where my networking stuff
gets set up:
=================cut-here=================================
#! /bin/sh
#
# rc.inet1 This shell script boots up the base INET system.
#
# Version: @(#)/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 1.01 05/27/93
#
HOSTNAME=`cat /etc/HOSTNAME`
# Attach the loopback device.
/sbin/ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 lo
# IF YOU HAVE AN ETHERNET CONNECTION, use these lines below to configure the
# eth0 interface. If you're only using loopback or SLIP, don't include the
# rest of the lines in this file.
# Edit for your setup.
IPADDR="192.168.100.10" # REPLACE with YOUR IP address!
NETMASK="255.255.255.0" # REPLACE with YOUR netmask!
NETWORK="192.168.100.0" # REPLACE with YOUR network address!
BROADCAST="192.168.100.255" # REPLACE with YOUR broadcast address, if you
# have one. If not, leave blank and edit below.
#GATEWAY="" # REPLACE with YOUR gateway address!
# Uncomment the line below to initialize the ethernet device.
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} broadcast ${BROADCAST} netmask ${NETMASK}
# Uncomment these to set up your IP routing table.
/sbin/route add -net ${NETWORK} netmask ${NETMASK} eth0
# End of rc.inet1
==================The End==========================================
I cut some other stuff out that was not needed.
I don't know if this will help or not but I it will give you something
to compare to.
Also, this is a Slackware system.
Sorry for the length.
--
Frank Hahn
Some primal termite knocked on wood.
And tasted it, and found it good.
And that is why your Cousin May
Fell through the parlor floor today.
-- Ogden Nash
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NF Stevens)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:31:14 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) wrote:
>NF Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) wrote:
>>
>>>If you don't know C++ templates, you don't know C++ at all. It is
>>>templates, for example, that make it possible to write a C++ library
>>>that does matrix operations as efficiently as specially-optimizing
>>>Fortran on machines specifically designed to run Fortran well. Unlike
>>>Fortran, though, C++ templates are not tuned specificially for matrix
>>>math, so can be used to accomplish similar wonders in any area.
>>
>>I have to disagree with this. Templates do not in any way improve
>>the efficiency of generated code. They are no faster (and no
>>slower) than the equivalent hand written code. Templates only
>>improve the efficiency of the programmer since only one (templated)
>>version has to be coded rather than individual versions for each
>>template class.
>
>C++ cannot of course be faster than the equivalent assembly
>code, but the C++ compiler can optimize code better than you
>can by hand in C, because it knows more about expressions than
>you can tell the C compiler.
That was not the point. I was comparing the code generated
by instanciation of a template with hand written C++ code.
The fact that templates expand to C++ code means that
_templates_ cannot improve the efficiency of code.
Norman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Need help sending files win to unix
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:10:44 GMT
I have a '98<->Linux<->'95 network up and running full file
sharing/mapping/printers The following sites did 99% of the work for
me.
This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
and this one as well
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
networked.
g'[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Our office has just converted from win3.1 running lantastic to
>windows98. The problem is one of the machines sent files to a unix
>machine using lantactic tcp/ip.
>The batch file to send the files is RCP %1 PLT:/export/home/jobs.
>rcp.exe is in the lantastic tcp directory
>The lmhost file reads:
>89.0.10.20 plot_1 PLOT_1 PLT plt fire1 FIRE1
>89.0.10.40 can CAM imark1 IMARK1
------------------------------
From: "Richi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and DSL
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:28:04 -0500
First I would like to say thanks for everyone that has given me pointers...
:)
Andrey here is the info you requested.
Thanks,
Rich
root@server /root]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:3B:19:6A
inet addr:168.192.1.1 Bcast:168.192.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
l�
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:39:B2:90
inet addr:168.192.1.2 Bcast:168.192.1.127 Mask:255.255.255.128
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:160 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:3 Base address:0xe800
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:86 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:86 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
[root@server /root]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
168.192.1.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth1
168.192.1.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0
168.192.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0
eth1
168.192.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7l3u3s$1c3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> Can you include output of ifconfig -a from your Linux machine, also
> netstat -rn and IP configuration of your DSL router.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Richi wrote in message ...
> >Hi Andrey,
> >
> >I have tow ethernet cards because one is supposed to be for the LAN and
the
> >other is to connect the Cisco router. I currently have the router hub
> >connected to the hub which is only temporary. I want the router to be
> >connected to the Linux machine and use IP masquerading and a firewall.
> >
> >I cant get the Linux box to work on the internet with DSL.
> >
> >I am really new at this and have tried everything. I would think with the
> >router connected to the eth0 card, I should be able to ping the router at
> >10.0.0.1 or .2. But I cat seem to do it. I am a little lost on what to
put
> >on the routing portion of netcfg.
> >
> >Thanks for the reply.
> >
> >Rich
> >Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:7l377h$rpq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I don't understand the purpose of the second net card. Looks like the
> >first
> >> card is on the subneted part of the network on which your second card
is.
> >>
> >> But in general what is exactly your problem?
> >>
> >>
> >> Richi wrote in message ...
> >> >I have some new info and I will recap some of the old for any
newcomers.
> >I
> >> >still haven't got it to talk yet, but learned some valuable info.
> >> >
> >> >First the Linux box has two network cards (eth0 and eth1)
> >> >
> >> >The eth0 card is configured as 192.168.1.1 with a netmask of
> >255.255.255.0
> >> >The eth1 card is configured as 192.168.1.2 with a netmask of
> >> >255.255.255.128
> >> >
> >> >All other windows machines on the LAN are 192.168.1.X and
> 255.255.255.128
> >> >
> >> >The router is set up as defualt. The only items I have entered into
the
> >> >router are:
> >> >set ppp wan0-0 ipcp 0.0.0.0
> >> >set ppp wan0-0 dns 0.0.0.0
> >> >set ppp restart enabled
> >> >set dhcp server enabled
> >> >set nat enabled
> >> >and login and passwords.
> >> >
> >> >This is what USWEST has in the book. This setup is currently working
> >> plugged
> >> >into my hub.
> >> >
> >> >What I just realized doing a winipcfg in windows was the Cisco 675
> router
> >> >has the following. I am going to add all info beacuse I am not sur if
it
> >is
> >> >relevent.
> >> >
> >> >Host name Rich
> >> >DNS servers 207.108.32.1 and 204.147.80.5
> >> >Node type =broadcast
> >> >IP address 10.0.0.2
> >> >Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0
> >> >Default gateway 10.0.0.1
> >> >DHCP server 10.0.0.1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I am thinking that this info needs to be entered under routing in
> netcfg
> >> >
> >> >Under router I have :
> >> >
> >> >default gateway____________
> >> >default gateway device__________
> >> >
> >> >And then if I click add I get
> >> >
> >> >Device_________________
> >> >Network_______________
> >> >Netmask_______________
> >> >Gateway_______________
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I tried a few combinations but haven't hit the right one.
> >> >
> >> >Any help is appreaciated. I hope to get this thing online this
weekend.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >
> >> >Rich
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP trouble with SuSE 6.1
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:57:58 -0400
the_demiurge wrote:
>
> I finally got my computer to connect with my isp, but i get no ping
> responses to anything but my remote ip address, as listed in the log file
> when i connect. Pinging anything else gives me a network unreachable
> error. Any help would be appreciated.
Have you checked your route tables with /sbin/route -n? You should have
a default route ("0.0.0.0") to the IP address as reported by ifconfig.
Have you tried a "traceroute xxx.yyy.zzz.aaa" to see if the problem is a
local routing issue, or a remote routing issue?
John
------------------------------
From: Bill Comisky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,redhat.networking.general
Subject: bootpd in redhat 6.0?
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:41:26 GMT
I'm having trouble getting my redhat macine to return information from a
bootp request. In tcpd is set up to handle bootpd in /etc/inetd.conf
When I boot my client machine with a boot disk, it sends out a bootp &
rarp request for boot info. The /var/secure file on the server logs a
bootp request from 0.0.0.0, but complains about not finding
/usr/sbin/bootpd.
I've seen RPMs for bootpd for redhat 5.x, but not for 6.0. I tried
linking /usr/sbin/tcpd to /usr/sbin/bootpd, but that didn't seem to work
(no "not found" message, but the client machine wouldn't boot).
I haven't recompiled the kernel on the server since the original
installation.. do I need to compile something in (or maybe insmod some
module in)?
any help appreciated!
bill
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony Ord)
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft
Retest News
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:10:47 GMT
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:11:20 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
wrote:
>On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:15:46 GMT, Anthony Ord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:56:07 +0100, Robin Becker
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <7l280k$1d9i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Hughes
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>>>How about these? Did MS cheat also? ;)
>>>>
>>>>http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/stories/reviews/0,6755,2256617,00.html
>>>>
>>>>http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/jumps/0,4270,401961,00.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>...
>>>a bit off topic, but an article in my paper, the Independent, states
>>>that M$'s encarta has different versions for different countries. If M$
>>>can claim in the US that Edison (October 1879) invented the electric
>>>light bulb before Swan (February 1879) then a few adjustments to
>>>benchmark results seem minor. Apparently the M$ mouthpiece says these
>>>sort of 'facts' aren't always black and white etc etc.
>>
>>It's just to appease the American public. Just like the
>>Second World War went from 1941 (when the Americans joined)
>>to 1945. What was it before that? A bun fight?
>
> Does Encarta say that? American public school textbooks
> certainly don't. Ours even covered the concentration camps.
What do you mean "even"? Any reason why they shouldn't?
>[deletia]
Regards
Anthony
--
=========================================
| And when our worlds |
| They fall apart |
| When the walls come tumbling in |
| Though we may deserve it |
| It will be worth it - Depeche Mode |
=========================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Local network setup help !!
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:43:14 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:34:01 +0200, Philippe CHARDONNET
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Snipped]
>My problem is that I don't know what I'm supposed to do to key in the data
>about my win98 computer in Linux such as Ip adress, submask, account and
>etc...
>
>What are these steps ?? If I can't tell Linux where it has to look for the
>other machine and how !! it'll be unable to make Samba working properly !!!
>
I have not followed this thread so I don't know what has been discussed,
but if you do not have networking working properly between your Windows
and Linux machines, then just forget about Samba for the time being.
If you can't ping either machine from the other or telnet from the
Windows machine to the Linux machine, then you need to get this sorted
out first.
The only thing Linux wants to know is the IP address of the Windows
machine which can be placed in the /etc/hosts file. If you are wanting
to use the Windows machine as a gateway to the Internet for the Linux
machine, then you will need to set this up in your startup scripts.
The Windows machine also needs a hosts file which goes in the
c:\windows directory.
Make sure Windows has TCP/IP networking installed and bound to the
network card.
Quite a bit of this is covered in the many How-Tos.
There is an article in an old issue of The Linux Gazette that may be
useful. The issue number is 20 I believe. It was in the Weekend
Mechanic section. The IP address is http://www.linuxgazette.com.
Are you sure your network card works, etc.?
>Man pages are way to complicated and as I said in my first e-mail I can't go
>any further without those thing fully installed on Linux !!!
>
Well, you better get used to reading them. In a lot of cases, they
might be the only documentation available.
--
Frank Hahn
Uncle Ed's Rule of Thumb:
Never use your thumb for a rule. You'll either hit it with a
hammmer or get a splinter in it.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lewis)
Subject: Re: LinkSys NIC LNE100TX: Anybody have any problems with this card? - Thanks
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:21:56 GMT
Thanks to all for your input!
R.J.
===================================================
The Lewis's
Remove "NoSpam_" from email address if replying by email.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
