Linux-Networking Digest #725, Volume #11 Tue, 29 Jun 99 23:13:47 EDT
Contents:
lockd: failed to monitor (Tom Wilson)
ethernet card on isa prob (sanynn)
Re: Private DNS useless?? (Nicholas E Couchman)
Re: Setting up Xisp (Rod Smith)
Re: Samba and X over PPP (Nicholas E Couchman)
Setting up Xisp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why not C++ (Cameron Hutchison)
Re: PPP won't compress - regardless of options... (Richard J. Wyble)
proftpd error 421 (Jonathan X Peers)
Too many files open ERROR! (Monte Phillips)
Re: many many many TX errors on ifconfig. (Bernd Eckenfels)
RH6 routing enable ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!! (Mohd H Misnan)
Re: Need help with some networking basics (Gary Helbig)
Multiple Remote Networks present IP conflict ("Eric Kuzniar")
Re: Ethernet Card?? (Akira)
Re: Plug n Pray disabled for 2 NIC's? (Vidar Andresen)
Re: NE2000 on Redhat 6.0 (Upali Weerasinghe)
Too many files open ERROR! (Monte Phillips)
Re: Plug n Pray disabled for 2 NIC's? (Monte Phillips)
Re: PPP won't compress - regardless of options... ("Eric Livingston")
I can ping localhost,gateway,and through to the WAN but.... ("You Know Who(and if
you dont you have no need)")
Downloading Redhat Linux-6.0 (Upali Weerasinghe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tom Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lockd: failed to monitor
Date: 29 Jun 1999 18:52:09 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just finished setting up a 2 machine network in my house. Everything
seems to be working fine, except for file locks over NFS mounted
directories (such as /var/spool/mail). I can read, write, delete,
and execute files from remote directories, but not lock files. This
is especially troublesome when trying to read mail and 'elm' fails since
it can't generate a lock.
I used the debug facilities in the kernel (echo 1 > /proc/sys/rpcinfo/*)
and observed the 'dmesg' output (client side):
rpciod_tcp_dispatcher: Queue Running
rpciod_tcp_dispatcher: Queue Running
rpciod_tcp_dispatcher: Queue Running
rpciod_tcp_dispatcher: Queue Running
nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-13
lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.1.1
If I'm reading this correctly, the status is the same as EACCES. But even
as root these locks can't be generated.
The two machines are both running Linux 2.2.9. The server is not using
the kernel NFS server.
I had a similar network setup prior to this one using the same server
(Linux 2.2.9), but the client was FreeBSD 3.2, and there were no problems
when it came to file locks.
Anyone have any ideas on how to solve this? I checked all the HOWTO's
that I thought may have a clue, but nothing. Dejanews (or deja.com) had
nothing on the subject.
--
Tom Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Well of course, everything looks bad if you remember it"
- Homer Simpson
------------------------------
From: sanynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ethernet card on isa prob
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:17:12 +0300
hi
i have network card connecting to isa bus model
intel 82595based-ethernet and the system doesnt see it at all
help me to install it.
thanks, nissim.
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Private DNS useless??
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:09:10 GMT
I would say yes, especially if you are tired of typing IP addresses. I
have a DNS server running on WinNT (it was harder to configure than any
Linux daemon I have ever setup), and it has been great. If you DHCP you
can link it to your DNS server, reserve IPs for certain computers w/ DHCP,
and have them assigned a host name automatically.
--Nick
Frank Waarsenburg wrote:
> I have RH6.0 running, connected to a private (192.168) network. The
> Linux runs DHCP, IPMasq and connects to my employers network (10.x) and
> my ISP (dynamic IP address) using ISDN. I don't have DNS running: just
> put my ISP's DNS addresses in /etc/resolv.conf. Is there any use in
> enabling DNS on my local LAN? Why should I want it??
>
> Frank
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: Setting up Xisp
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:02:45 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Posted and mailed]
In article <7lbh5d$tff$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have installed the xisp 2.5 for my redhat 5.2, but it won't make a
> connection. I've installed it in the /opt/xisp*** partition. First it
> dials up then connects and then after a while it hangs up. What did I
> not do yet? I've checked the options file and only lock is there. And
> for pap-secrets, linuxconf added the userid and password automatically,
> but there is no auth command. How do I set everything up? or is there a
> FAQ around somewhere?
Read the documentation. Carefully. My hunch is (since you didn't
mention doing it) that you've got to change the permissions on some of
your files. This is all described in the X-ISP documentation. You can
also (as root) do a "cat /var/log/messages" to check the PPP connection
messages (both normal activity and errors get reported here).
--
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
Author of _Special Edition Using WordPerfect for Linux_, from Que;
see http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith/books.html
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba and X over PPP
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:01:45 GMT
Last time I checked, samba or X aren't supported, with these exceptions.
You can get a program called VNC (Virutal Computer Networking) that will
allow you to setup a server on the Linux end and put the client on the
other end (client is small, can easily fit on floppy or FTP site), and
you can access X server(s) via TCP/IP (using IP addresses or
hostnames). I'm not sure about Samba, but last I heard, it wasn't PPP
compatible.
--Nick
ollivier civiol wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
> I have two network adaptors : 1 is lan the other is connectinf the
> cable modem
>
> I have a dialin link through a modem (mgetty + pppd)
>
> When I login from a machine accross the net I can see samba drives,
> access internet and run Xwindow (from Windows98) with a Xwindow
> client.
>
> When I login through the PPP link (modem) I access internet but the
> Xclient will not work, I use XDPM protocol, the server shows as
> BRODCASTING but it will not open a session and the netwok (samba) does
> not work. I cannot even ping my server from the Windows98 client but I
> access the second adaptor (connected to the cable modem).
>
> In fact my server acts as a provider when you enter through the PPP
> link.
>
> How can I gain access to SAMBA and XWINDOW through the PPP link.
>
> Thanks for your help in advance.
>
> Best regards
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setting up Xisp
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:26:02 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have installed the xisp 2.5 for my redhat 5.2, but it won't make a
connection. I've installed it in the /opt/xisp*** partition. First it
dials up then connects and then after a while it hangs up. What did I
not do yet? I've checked the options file and only lock is there. And
for pap-secrets, linuxconf added the userid and password automatically,
but there is no auth command. How do I set everything up? or is there a
FAQ around somewhere?
Thanks
Pat
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Cameron Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 29 Jun 1999 23:27:34 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Davis) writes:
>On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:53:08 +1200, Bruce Hoult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> some_function(&foo);
>>
>>What will be foo's value after the call to some_function? Will it be
>>altered? In C he has no way of knowing because C programmers often pass
>>structs by reference even when they don't intend to change them.
>At least the syntax indicates whether or not foo could be altered.
>The fact remains that one cannot look at
>
> some_function (x)
>in C++ and be sure that x was not modified, whereas in C you know that
>the local variable x will not be affected.
In C you still dont know that x will be unaffected.
Consider this:
#define inc(x) (++(x))
...
int x = 1;
...
inc(x);
In this case, x is being modified and you cannot tell from the context. It
may be bad form to write a macro with lower case letters, but it can also
be argued that it is bad form to use non-const references in C++.
--
Cameron Hutchison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | Onward To Mars
GCS d--@ -p+ c++(++++) l++ u+ e+ m+(-) s n- h++ f? !g w+ t r+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard J. Wyble)
Crossposted-To:
comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.misc,redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: PPP won't compress - regardless of options...
Date: 30 Jun 1999 01:51:43 GMT
In article <hwee3.16482$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>I've properly aliased ppp-compress-21,24, and 26, and lsmod reports that
>both ppp_deflate and bsd_comp are loaded and used by 1 process... yet
>there's not active compression taking place!!!
How have you determined there is no active compression?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard J. Wyble
------------------------------
From: Jonathan X Peers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: proftpd error 421
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:51:46 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using jurix linux..... i have downloaded the proftp.tar.gz from the
jurix ftp server and have untar it from /
I put the following line in my inetd.conf and restarted it
....................
ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd proftpd
When I try and ftp my localhost I get the following error message
..................
oak:/etc # ftp localhost
Connected to localhost.
421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
ftp>
can anyone please point me in the right direction or tell me what i have
not done.
Jonathan Peers
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Too many files open ERROR!
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:29:18 GMT
LinuxBox<->Win98 samba networked. All functions mapping, read, write
etc from WinBox are working. I am running RH 6.0-2.2.9 and samba
2.0.4b (this error arose sometime after the kernel & samba upgrade.
Sadly I upgraded together.(o wellll live and tear hair)
In linux I issue ]# smbmount //Win98/DriveA -c 'mount /samba'
no errors
I do a
ls /samba
and I get this ]# too any files open in system.
If I midnight Cmndr the /samba dir it 'breaks mc. doesn't lock the
system.
I then issue smbumount /samba
and all is well again.
Need ideas badly<G>
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: many many many TX errors on ifconfig.
Date: 29 Jun 1999 23:11:15 GMT
Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:6C:17:03
> inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:255.255.255.248
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:9106752 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:0 errors:920481313 dropped:8492047 overruns:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
looks like an error in ifconfig, can you send the output of "cat
/proc/net/dev > file.txt" to me, pls?
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RH6 routing enable
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:47:56 GMT
I am trying ot get Linux to route with RH6.0
My netowrks are 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.11.0
Eth0 is 192.168.10.90
Eth1 is 192.168.11.1
My local router is at 192.168.10.1 another is available at 10.99
I can ping both routers from the linux box
When I connect another box to the 11.0 subnet with address 192.168.11.11
I can ping both interfaces on the Linux box but cannot ping the local
gateway
I have enable routing in Linuxconf and have compiled routing into the
kernel
In every way I can check routing appears to be enabled....
What are the things that one MUST do to have routing work?
Which kernel options apply to basic routing?
Any ideas what I am doing wrong?
Does the RH6 kernel come with routing enabled?
How can I be certain?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mohd H Misnan)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!!
Date: 29 Jun 1999 22:55:25 GMT
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:18:13 -0600, Bill Anderson wrote:
>JimC wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > If I can get a few good racing games on Linux, I can totally dump MS. Once a
>> > few more mainstream companies start producing Linux versions of games I will
>> > start recommending Linux to people as a desktop. At present for most people
>> > Linux is not yet an alternitive, but it's coming.
>> >
>>
>> On the games side, is Civilization (or the new superduper space version)
>> available for Linux?
>>
>> That would be great...
>>
>> JimC
>
>You mean Civilization: Call To Power (ie civ III)?
>Yes, and runs very well .
Wow.. this is great, anywhere I can order the game from? I'm looking for a CD
that has all 3 main OSes supported.. hopefully they'll have Linux/MacOS/Win9x in
one CD distribution.
--
|Mohd Hamid Misnan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|iMac/233RevB/MacOS 8.6 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|AMDK6-2/300/Linux2.2.10 | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/3319/ |
-"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of purge."
------------------------------
From: Gary Helbig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need help with some networking basics
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:34:20 -0700
Vikram Prabhu wrote:
>
> Gary Helbig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Vikram,
> >
> > IIWM, I'd put the firewall on the 75MHz, and the file server on the
> > Celeron.
>
> Could you please explain why this would be a good idea?
>
75 MHz is fast enough for a firewall up to about T1 speeds.
If you're going to be sharing home directories on one machine, it's
going to be busy.
The machine closest to the users' keyboard should be the fastest. In
this case, that would be the file server.
But heck, try it both ways, and see what works.
>
> > Oh, and do yourself a BIG favor. Do a net search for the "linux
> > documentation project". Once you find a local mirror, bookmark it.
>
> I've already got a local copy of the HOWTOs, just don't know which of
> the network related ones to read.
>
Start with the NET3 howto.
>
> --
> Vikram Prabhu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Eric Kuzniar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multiple Remote Networks present IP conflict
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:43:27 -0400
My linux boxes at home are all on one network which works fine.
There are several remote private networks that I connect to through dialups
or tunneling through ssh. These also work fine.
My problem is that I have hit a conflict between two of the private
networks. Both Network A and B happen to have machines that I need to access
(preferably simultaneously) with the same IP addresses (192.168.0.8).
Currently in order to get files from a the target machine on Network A
to the Target machine on Network B I have to connect to the remote machine
copy the files to the local machine, then change the route for the IP
Network from ppp0 to ppp1 and then connect and copy to the machine on
Network B. Anyone have any good ideas/solutions?
Eric
------------------------------
From: Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet Card??
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:55:02 GMT
Daniel Wilson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Would like some one to recommend to me what is considered the best
> > ethernet card for Redhat linux 6.0 but is also compatiable with Win98 and
> > NT 4.0. Many thanks to those who may reply.
> >
> > Larry
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've got a 3com 509B Combo ISA working quite nicely under linux and
> win95, I shouldn't think you'll have a problem with it under nt either.
>
> if you can still get them that is..
>
> ***********
> Dan
They're still made.. no need to spend extra money on the combo part unless
you're running coax.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Plug n Pray disabled for 2 NIC's?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:57:03 +0200
In article <7lbht1$50c2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After trying all of the tricks, eth1 is still not recognized. I have 2 ISA
>ne2000 cards. Do I need to disable plug n play? If so, how can I do it
>without putting the card in a dos machine and disabling plug and play?
I dont know if you need to do so. But if.
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/diag/index.html for a start. Maybee.
If not:
A bootable dos-floppy with whatever it take to do the job. Will make
_your_ machine that _dos_ _machine_.
So if you know what you need. A image (dd) of something dos-bootable.
written to a floppy. Then mount it.
And dosemu for packing out the files. (if .exe) then put them on the
floppy. reboot.
Maybee dosemu will allow you to fiddle with the nic.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: Upali Weerasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NE2000 on Redhat 6.0
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:52:14 GMT
If you have pci network card you can find its information like this:
login as root then -- cat /proc/pci
then you'll see something like this:
Bus 0, device 15, function 0:
Ethernet controller: Realtek 8029 (rev 0).
Medium devsel. IRQ 10.
I/O at 0x6c00 [0x6c01]. Write this down please.
now do this : modprobe -l |more
you should see: some or all your modules
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/ne.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/ne2k-pci.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/shaper.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/ethertap.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/8390.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/ppp_deflate.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/slhc.o
/lib/modules/2.2.5-22/net/ppp.o
now type this "linuxconf" at the prompt
if you have a only one card that is a [eth0]
you module is [ne.o] or you can use [ne2k-pci.o]
remember don't type .o there only [ne]
put your TCP/IP INFOMATION
REBOOT !
now type at to root's prompt "lsmod" you'll see
Module Size Used by
nls_iso8859-1 2020 1 (autoclean)
ip_masq_irc 1520 0 (unused)
ip_masq_raudio 2736 0
ip_masq_ftp 2352 0
ne2k-pci 3812 1 (autoclean)
8390 6244 0 (autoclean) [ne2k-pci]
tulip 25252 1 (autoclean)
in my case I have 2 network card in same computer, but I am talking about
NE2000 card.
[ne2k-pci.o] is the Network Card, you can see my kernal auto loading
8390 thats the way its work, ( don't ask me )
Chitla Sudhir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can try 'netconf' and set the properties.
> Eran Dvey-Aharon wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>In installation , I selected the card , but when probing, the
>>installation couldn't detect the card.
>>
>>2. After installation , how can I get to those selection menus once
>>again ?
>>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,alt.os.linux,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Too many files open ERROR!
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:25:44 GMT
LinuxBox<->Win98 samba networked. All functions mapping, read, write
etc from WinBox are working. I am running RH 6.0-2.2.9 and samba
2.0.4b (this error arose sometime after the kernel & samba upgrade.
Sadly I upgraded together.(o wellll live and tear hair)
In linux I issue ]# smbmount //Win98/DriveA -c 'mount /samba'
no errors
I do a
ls /samba
and I get this ]# too any files open in system.
If I midnight Cmndr the /samba dir it 'breaks mc. doesn't lock the
system.
I then issue smbumount /samba
and all is well again.
Need ideas badly<G>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Plug n Pray disabled for 2 NIC's?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:35:37 GMT
"Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After trying all of the tricks, eth1 is still not recognized. I have 2 ISA
>ne2000 cards. Do I need to disable plug n play? If so, how can I do it
>without putting the card in a dos machine and disabling plug and play?
Put a Dos Boot disk into the machine boot, insert the dos NIC setup
disk do your stuff. Reboot to linux.
------------------------------
From: "Eric Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.misc,redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: PPP won't compress - regardless of options...
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:19:20 -0400
Richard J. Wyble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lbt7f$ldn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How have you determined there is no active compression?
#pppstats -r -v ppp1
IN PACK VJCOMP VJTOSS NON-VJ RATIO UBYTE | OUT PACK VJCOMP
VJSRCH VJMISS RATIO UBYTE
6031718 16169 12101 0 3860 1.00 0 | 580956 10725 9436
297 19 1.00 0
#pppstats -z ppp1
IN: COMPRESSED INCOMPRESSIBLE COMP | OUT: COMPRESSED INCOMPRESSIBLE
COMP
BYTE PACK BYTE PACK RATIO | BYTE PACK BYTE PACK
RATIO
0 0 0 0 0.00 | 0 0 0 0
0.00
(Note: From "man pppstats"
When the -z option is specified, instead displays the following
fields, relating to the packet compression
algorithm currently in use. If packet compression is not in use,
these fields will all display zeroes. )
#cat dev
Inter-| Receive | Transmit
face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes
packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
ppp1: 6069421 16253 0 0 0 0 0 0 587924
10742 0 0 0 0 0 0
The evidence seems pretty compelling... :)
------------------------------
From: "You Know Who(and if you dont you have no need)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: I can ping localhost,gateway,and through to the WAN but....
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:36:28 -0500
When I try to do anything (i.e. telnet,ftp,http) I get network is
unreachable error.
I can use nslookup on DNS servers that are beyond my gateway, but I cant
even
traceroute to them. All attempts at traceroute point to the same server,
but dns resolves
the correct ip addresses for hosts across the network. Any thoughts
would be
appreciated. I have read the Linux Documentation Projects how-tos but
haven't
figured this out.
Using RedHat 5.2
IBM TokenRing
------------------------------
From: Upali Weerasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Downloading Redhat Linux-6.0
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:25:59 GMT
This Message spacially for windows user and of course Linux
===========================================================.
Since I got the Cable Modem, many of my friends asked me, to Set up
FTP server and put REDHAT linux on it. So I did it,
because most of the Redhat mirrors are very slow, why so many users,
I like that, why ? everybody going Linux. not Windows NT
if you guys have faster connection you can install RedHat via my Ftp server
if you are using modem, then the best bet is download it.
here is the address:
ftp://upnet.dyndns.com
All the RPM's
ftp://upnet.dyndns.com/pub/linux/redhat/redhat-6.0/i386/RedHat/RPMS
If you want to create boot disk
ftp://upnet.dyndns.com/pub/linux/redhat/redhat-6.0/i386/images
Right now I am writing good Linux help web pages about:
INSTALLING, NETWORK (TCP/IP, MASQ), PPP(client & Server), DNS, SAMBA,
FIREWALL, (not yet)
and Howto setup Secure Web server, if you want check mine:
https://upnet.dyndns.com
Upali Weerasinghe ( Joe )
System Administrator / Network Technican
Scarborough, Canada
http://upnet.dyndns.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
