Linux-Networking Digest #741, Volume #11          Thu, 1 Jul 99 06:13:51 EDT

Contents:
  RH Linux Guru Final Exam ("Ricky J. Sethi")
  Re: Why not C++ ("Thomas Steffen")
  Re: redirect port 80 traffic to machine inside firewall? (phon)
  Is this client or server problem? (Tero Niemi)
  mgetty[440]: failed in mg_init_data, dev=ttyS1 (Azfar Kazmi)
  SMTP Server ("Steve P.")
  Re: internet connection with Linux (Mohamad Termizi)
  Re: internet connection with Linux (Mohamad Termizi)
  Re: C++ templates:  More than Turing Complete? (Nathan Myers)
  Re: Automount of SMB Filesystems (Harald Fuchs)
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Csaba Raduly)
  Re: DHCP and IP Masquerading ("Brassel, Claude [BOIS:8817:EXCH]")
  Re: Why not C++ (Stephan Houben)
  Re: Why not C++ (Stephan Houben)
  counting traffic by user (Yorkshire UK (God's County))
  ipchains/snmpd question (razoon)
  Re: Problem initializing modem. (Paul Gallagher)
  HELP AcerLAN-315 Digital DS21142 Problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: FTP-users cannot login (MAX)
  Re: NFS uid/gid mess (Eran Dvey-Aharon)
  Re: Connecting a Linux Box to a Unix Box (Chris Harshman)
  vt100 documentation and parsing ("Jean-Christophe Dhellemmes")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Ricky J. Sethi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: RH Linux Guru Final Exam
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:20:02 -0700

Always had an itch to see how good you really were at this networking stuff?
Well, here's your chance to finally test your mettle.  This problem has
stumped everyone I know and they have all been forced to relinquish their
crowns.  So, it's up for grabs... anyone who helps me solve this problem,
wins all bragging rights AND the vaunted no-prize!  So what is this problem?

Briefly, I just installed Redhat 6.0/WinNT dualboot and I have IP aliasing
enabled according to the scheme below (primary interface has a real IP;
first alias has a real IP; 2nd alias has a fake IP).  So the problem is that
the IP aliasing seems to timeout after a while under RedHat.  I'm using a
Linksys Etherfast (with the latest tulip driver) and the aliases work fine
under Windoze NT.  However, after about 40 minutes, none of the aliases are
pingable under redhat.  The primary interface stays functional throughout
but the aliases all seem to timeout.  A reboot or poweroff doesn't change
this.  The only thing that seems to help is to remove all the aliases AND
the primary interface and then reenter the primary and aliases again.  It
then works again for about 40 minutes, after which time the aliases time out
once again (but the primary interface continues to work).  I've tried using
both ifconfig and the netcfg from the control-panel to no avail.

So there you have it... if you can help solve this not only will you have my
eternal undying gratitude; not only will you be able to wear the Linux Guru
Crown with pride; but you'll also be the winner of the one and only no-prize
(offer valid in the contiguous united states; we are an equal opportunity
empire; local sales tax may apply).

Thanks in advance!


Rick.



Ricky J. Sethi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> Hi guys,
>
> Okay, a couple of (very) kind souls asked for the ifconfig output so here
> goes...
>
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:CC:26:4C:5E
>           inet addr:209.178.112.10  Bcast:209.178.112.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:58673 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:59098 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:2638 txqueuelen:100
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6800
>
> eth0:0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:CC:26:4C:5E
>           inet addr:209.178.112.8  Bcast:209.178.112.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6800
>
> eth0:1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:CC:26:4C:5E
>           inet addr:192.168.0.5  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6800
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3924  Metric:1
>           RX packets:143 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:143 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks again!!!
>
>
> Rick.
>





------------------------------

From: "Thomas Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 01 Jul 1999 09:10:27 +0200

Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> some would say static typing is a burden.

they have to be ignorants. types are one of the most important
software engineering aspects (and this is not my private opinion). 

would you drive a car where you don't know whether the brakes work, or 
exist at all? no. but you would run a program where you don't know
that the types are compatible, yes? 

static (or compile time) typing has two key advantaged:

a) type checking at compile time (and checking should be done as early 
   as possible. of course design time would be better...)
b) speed. knowing the type means optimisation is possible, maybe even
   the dispatch is possible to infer. 

if you don't like this, you can use interfaces and RTTI, which gives
you all the flexibility there is, while still doing some type checks
at compile time. 

-- 
linux, linuctis - f, das beste Betriebssystem ;-) 

------------------------------

From: phon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: redirect port 80 traffic to machine inside firewall?
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 08:42:49 +0200

what you need is rinetd ( internet redirection service ).
get a binary somewhere and install it
then place in the /etc/rinetd.conf file the following rule :

bindaddress            bindport        connectaddress    connectport

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx      80                 192.168.0.3         80
           ^
     firewall address

then just restart rinetd by hupping it or by rebooting

this will redirect all trafic that comes on port 80 of xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to
port 80 on 192.168.0.3

note : this can also be used to redirect ports on the same computer , just
use for bindaddress and connectaddress the same IP

i hope my explanation has helped you a bit with your problem

phon.

Matt Bartley wrote:

> With a typical LAN gatewayed to the 'net with a IPmasq Linux box, is
> it possible to redirect traffic to port 80 from the outside world to a
> system _inside_ the firewall?
>
>    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx  (static IP from ISP)
>          ||
>      IPmasq box
>          ||
>      192.168.0.1
>      192.168.0.3      www server
>
> I'd like the web server on 192.168.0.3 to be reachable from the
> outside world at the static IP address assigned by the ISP.  I've
> heard it is possible to do this, but no one I've asked knows how, and
> I haven't yet figured it out from reading HOWTOs and the ipfwadm
> manpage.
>
> Is this possible?  If so, how?
>
> --
> "When PCs run new applications successfully, most people feel relief
> and almost pathetic gratitude - a standard of reliability tolerated in
> no other consumer product."
>         _Economist_, Sept. 12 1998


------------------------------

From: Tero Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is this client or server problem?
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 10:33:15 +0300


I have RH6.0 with Apache running. Problem is that if we look our pages
with modem from outside
pages doesn't show correctly. Images are missing and such. If I look
these pages from any LAN
machine in our LAN or other, they work just fine.

Is it that the server gets bored with so slow connection and refuses to
server or what is the problem?
We have tested it both with IE and NS. Please help.




------------------------------

From: Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp,com.os.linux.misc
Subject: mgetty[440]: failed in mg_init_data, dev=ttyS1
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 07:29:53 GMT

Here is what I get when I enable my serial port through inittab using
following entry:

s1:345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty -n 1 -D ttyS1

<QUOTE from /var/log/messages>
Jul  1 11:29:16 inet mgetty[440]: failed in mg_init_data, dev=ttyS1,
pid=440
Jul  1 11:29:19 inet mgetty[441]: init chat failed, exiting...:
Interrupted syst
em call
Jul  1 11:29:19 inet mgetty[441]: failed in mg_init_data, dev=ttyW0,
pid=441
Jul  1 11:29:20 inet kernel: Timeout waiting for close
Jul  1 11:29:22 inet init: Switching to runlevel: 6
Jul  1 11:29:22 inet mgetty[445]: failed dev=ttyS1, pid=445, got signal
15, exit
ing
Jul  1 11:29:22 inet mgetty[446]: failed dev=ttyW0, pid=446, got signal
15, exit
ing
Jul  1 11:29:28 inet kernel: Timeout waiting for close
<UNQUOTE>

Is this because I don't have any modem connected to this port at the
moment? Or something wrong with the setup or the mgetty? I am using
Redhat 5.2 kernel 2.2.9 with mgetty-1.1.14-5

At the moment I am using generic conf for mgetty i.e.:

debug 4
speed 38400

Should I add something else?

Box is PII based DELL OptiPlex with 64MB RAM.

--
Azfar Kazmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: "Steve P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMTP Server
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 06:56:54 GMT

Hi,

I configured my computer using YaST as a SMTP-Server.
But I don't know how to check the state!
If I send mails with big attachments I just see my modem
sending, but I don't know how many percent has already
been sent or when it is complete.

Is there any possiblity to check the progress of sending mails?

Stephan





------------------------------

From: Mohamad Termizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: internet connection with Linux
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 15:06:12 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi..

I am experiencing the same problem too. Yes, I can ping my remote IP
address. But still no response from Netscape. BTW, how do I setup the said
DNS?

TIA

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Can you ping IP addresses?  It might just be a problem with the DNS
> settings.
>
> Eric
> In article <7l5u50$s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Brutus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm using Open Linux 2.2 with KDE and I'm running kppp to get
> connected to
> > my ISP. I'm able to get a connection through kppp but none of my
> > applications seem to be able to find it. Netscape comes back with an
> error
> > saying that the internet server is not found, telnet also can't find
> a
> > connection. Does anyone have any suggestions?
> > thanks
> >
> > ------------------  Posted via SearchLinux  ------------------
> >                   http://www.searchlinux.com
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.




------------------------------

From: Mohamad Termizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: internet connection with Linux
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 15:07:00 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi..

I am experiencing the same problem too. Yes, I can ping my remote IP
address. But still no response from Netscape. BTW, how do I setup the said
DNS?

TIA

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Can you ping IP addresses?  It might just be a problem with the DNS
> settings.
>
> Eric
> In article <7l5u50$s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Brutus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm using Open Linux 2.2 with KDE and I'm running kppp to get
> connected to
> > my ISP. I'm able to get a connection through kppp but none of my
> > applications seem to be able to find it. Netscape comes back with an
> error
> > saying that the internet server is not found, telnet also can't find
> a
> > connection. Does anyone have any suggestions?
> > thanks
> >
> > ------------------  Posted via SearchLinux  ------------------
> >                   http://www.searchlinux.com
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: C++ templates:  More than Turing Complete?
Date: 1 Jul 1999 01:57:18 -0700

Christopher B. Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
>>(Nathan Myers) wrote:
>>> [C++ templates] allow construction of 
>>> libraries that cannot be constructed in any other language.  
>>
>>That's an *extremely* strong statement.
>
>I tend to agree.  This has the feeling of being a hyperbolic statement
>to claim an advantage likely to be true only if "any other language" is
>defined as being "any language in the set {C, Pascal}."

The convention in some communities is to ignore performance
and engineering rigor.  Certainly anything can be achieved in
assembly language (or in T-code, if you like) that can be achieved 
with a C++ _program_, given infinite time and coding effort.

Given the constraints of a sensible _library_ interface and
equivalent-to-machine-code performance, C++ achieves what
other languages haven't, yet.

Of course some other languages will achieve parity, someday, but 
only those designed by people who fully understand the strengths of 
standard C++.  Maybe such a language will even succeed in avoiding
its weaknesses.

-- 
Nathan Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.cantrip.org/


------------------------------

From: Harald Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Automount of SMB Filesystems
Date: 01 Jul 1999 10:45:27 +0200

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> I had the same desire as well... I created a refresh_mounts script
> that I added to my rc.local file and also to my cron.hourly script
> under /etc/cron.hourly/

> It mounts the drives with permissions needed and also checks each one
> every hour to see if it falls off and remounts it.

IMHO way too complicated.  I simply use automount: the share gets
mounted automagically when you access it, and it gets unmounted after
some time of inactivity.

------------------------------

From: Csaba Raduly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 10:09:26 +0100

Geoff Winans wrote:
============== >8 ===============
> I have a technical problem--what kind of Oil do I use on my Deisel powered
> NIC? :)

Snake oil, of course :-)
Csaba
--
Csaba Raduly,    Software Developer (OS/2),    Sophos Anti-Virus
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]            http://www.sophos.com/
US Support +1 888 SOPHOS 9            UK Support +44 1235 559933
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. <Space for hire>

------------------------------

From: "Brassel, Claude [BOIS:8817:EXCH]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP and IP Masquerading
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 10:45:22 +0200

Hello,

I have no idea for your problem, but probably you can help me ! My
problem is to recognize more then one ethernet card automatically
whitout lilo boot options. How can I do it ?

Ron Copeland wrote:

> My network consists of a server connected to the cable modem, using
> DHCP of course, and the remainder of my computers have fixed
> 192.168.x.x addresses and connect to the internet through the server
> via IP masquerading.
>
> DHCP is working good, IP masquerading is working good, but how can I
> get the nameserver info into the client's resolv.conf automatically?
>
> I suppose I could put a nameserver on the gateway machine, but not
> this week.  Does anybody have another solution?
>
> Thanks,
> Ron

--
C. Brassel

=================================================================
               Nortel GSM Networks - IS/BP France
                  19, avenue du Centre - BP 50
                78042 GUYANCOURT Cedex - FRANCE
email    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  mail   : CT11
phone  : ESN-579-3916                  fax    : ESN-579-5005
ext.ph : +33.1.39.44.39.16             ext.fax: +33.1.39.44.50.05
=================================================================




------------------------------

From: Stephan Houben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 01 Jul 1999 11:41:10 +0200

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Comeau) writes:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stephan Houben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>writes:

> >Templates in C++ solve a  problem that simply doesn't exist in most other modern
> >programming languages. The fact that it exists in C++ is due to the fact that C++
> >is based on C.

[apparently insufficient example snipped]

> >IMHO, C++'s templates are a useful hack to repair a basic flaw in C's type system.
> >However, there are certainly much more elegant solutions.
> 
> I don't follow.  I simply don't follow.  First you say stuff like
> that templates in C++ solve a problem that doesn't exist in other
> languages, and then go on to show generic capabilities of other
> languages.  That's contradictory.
> 

No it's not. (It is! Is not! Is! ... ;-) )

Let me try to rephrase this again. I see two different things:
1. The capability to create a function that will operate in a
   similar way on arguments.
   This capability is often called `generosity'.
2. The way this capability is available in C++, i.e. through templates.

Generosity is very important. However, in a language like Haskell
generosity is "built in" into the type system in a very regular
way. In C++, it is tacked on to the existing C type system.

This means that a template in C++ is something "special":
1. you have to indicate it with the word `template'
2. you have to make its definition available via header files everywhere
   it is used (OK, there are other tricks, and some compilers have a
   "template repository", but you can't really rely on that if you
   want to remain portable)
3. you cannot make a generic variable type: something like:
    template <class X>
    static X x;
   is not possible.
4. Every "instance" of a template behaves as if it was a separate
   object, instead of being the same object applied to different types.
   
So for these reasons, I think that C++ templates are indeed a "kludge".

> It's no secret that I'm very much into C++.  However, I ALWAYS
> want to learn more about how other langs do stuff.  

Then stop posting here and take a look at *real* generosity
in a language like Haskell or ML.

If you did this, then you would realize that "templates" are only
the shadow on the wall of a much more powerful and elegant system,
namely an ML-style type system. 

> But I keep
> seeing posts like above, which attack C++ and then don't clearly
> show alteratives.  Come on, I'm all psyched up for something hard core.

Well, if a three line program doesn't convince you, I can sympathise with that,
but sorry I'm not going to copy the whole Haskell tutorial here verbatim.

Go get it yourself at http://www.haskell.org .

Greetings,

Stephan 

------------------------------

From: Stephan Houben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 01 Jul 1999 11:44:36 +0200

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike McDonald) writes:

> In article <7ldsrt$cb2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
> > Stephan Houben  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >>Templates in C++ solve a  problem that simply doesn't exist in most 
> >>other modern programming languages. The fact that it exists in C++ is 
> >>due to the fact that C++ is based on C.
> > 
> > False.  They solve a problem that exists because C++ offers static
> > typing, a feature of profound importance for rigorous engineering.
> > 
> 
>    FUD!!

I wanted to say it myself, but you'be beaten me to it...

Haskell and ML are *completely statically type-checked*.
(Unlike C++ templates, which are only marginally checked when
parsed, and only fully checked when finally instantiated.)

The fact that the compiler can derive all those tedious type declarations
for you only eliminates one further source of human error.

Greetings,

Stephan

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yorkshire UK (God's County))
Subject: counting traffic by user
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 07:14:30 GMT

I am interested if there is a method whereby i can count network
traffic by user from my machine, it's a small machine run for no
profit, a few accounts given away to friends.
some user is sucking up my meagre bandwidth allocation and i cant work
out who.
is there a tool to do this?

Thanks in Advance, all help appreciated

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (razoon)
Subject: ipchains/snmpd question
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 07:14:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I want people be able to make an anonymous ftp connection to my
server.

Now I read in the messages file someone was connected through snmpd.
Is that something to worry about? What can the person do? 

Which ipchains-rules to activate for letting people in as anonymous
user and be relativly safe on the other hand?

thanks

------------------------------

From: Paul Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem initializing modem.
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux.dial-up,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 10:46:54 GMT


There's a pretty good resourse for setting up a PnP modem at the Red=20
Hat website.
It's at http://www.redhat.com/corp/docs/ under the PPP Client Tips.=20

In particular, the section on PnP modems, which covers Isapnptools and=20
setserial,
might be useful.

P


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 7/1/99, 12:02:40 AM, Daniel Connelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote=20
regarding Re: Problem initializing modem.:


> try setting the jumpers so its not pnp, set it to com2 or 3
> hope this helps
> zeedan

> "Troy C. Newman" wrote:

> > I currently am running a usr 56k sportster (ISA not winmodem)... The=
=20
jumpers
> > are set a PnP and windows puts it @ com3 irq5... within Linux(RH6) I=
=20
cannot
> > even initialize  even though I have tried all four com ports
> > (ttys0-ttys3...etc).  Can anyone give me some info about where to go=
=20
from
> > here.
> >
> > thanks...tcn

> --
> Great ideas are controversial
> Or at least were at one time.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HELP AcerLAN-315 Digital DS21142 Problem
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:42:08 GMT

hi,
Ive installed Red-Hat 5.2 on my Acer system with Acer Lan 315 10/100
Adapter(DigitalDS21142/3 chipset). Linux identifies it as Tulip . But
the problem is that the adapter does not autonegotiate with LAN to go
into 100Mbps mode.
If I to do a 'network restart' quite a number of times, then at one
point it stays at 100Mbps mode and starts functioning.
Can anybody overthere suggest me of a suitable driver for this card or
any settings that i can change so that the adapter by default goes to
100Mbps mode.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanx
SunilN


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: MAX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FTP-users cannot login
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 12:03:14 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the message I get over and over in /var/log/ftpd-log when a user
tries to log in.

Wed 23/06/99 22:01:40   281 "username"    LOGIN by "username"
"(userpassword)" from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(dc2-isdn552.dial.xs4all.nl)
Wed 23/06/99 22:01:42   281 "username"    LOGOUT (quit)

This is a user with a dynamic IP-address.
Should that make any difference ?
Why does it say unknown ?
Maybe a nameserver problem? My resolv.conf is O.K.
Do I need to have "named" installed ?
How do I grant access to this user with the hostfiles ?

M@X
=====================================================================

The host files are to control access by anyone anywhere, not just the
local network.

--
And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
uncommonly entertaining thread...

MAKZ wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I Have just one computer conected to my ISP via modem - PPP , no
>firewall
>and nothing like that compiled into the kernel, just the basic
>networking options,
>ppp, unix domain sockets, tcp/ip, no extra stuff.
>IP-forwarding is disabled at bootup.
>By the way, are the host files only meant to regulate hosts on a
LOCAL
>network ?
>
>M@X
>
>YouDontKnowWho wrote:
>>
>> Do you have a firewall set up?  Are the external hosts coming
through
>> the firewall to get to your FTP server?
>>
>> --
>> And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
>> uncommonly entertaining thread...
>>
>> MAKZ wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >I use the ftp4all daemon under RedHat 6.0
>> >
>> >If I test this on my own computer with the loopback interface
>> 127.0.0.1,
>> >with an adress like: root:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/home/ , or over my
ISP
>> >(user:passwd@myISPadresss/pub/home/) and also with an anonymous
>> login,
>> >then everything works O.K.
>> >
>> >However, when registered or anonymous users try to login from a
>> remote
>> >host,it doesn't work correctly and all they see is a blank screen
in
>> >their
>> >browser.
>> >I do get a message that they are logging in (and logging out
directly
>> >afterwards)
>> >in my ftpd-log file, the ftpd-error logfile shows no errors.
>> >The directory permissions are, I think, correct.
>> >
>> >Could it be the files /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny (they
>> contain
>> >no lines
>> >on my system) or do I need another daemon like inetd or routed?
The
>> only
>> >daemons I
>> >use are network and ftp4all (and pppd of course).
>> >
>> >Could somebody help me out ?

------------------------------

From: Eran Dvey-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS uid/gid mess
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 11:00:30 +0300

This is my own reply to myself .... hope someone might find it useful

Well.... I recompiled linux kernel with all NFS options, and it worked.

Eran Dvey-Aharon wrote:

> Hi experts !
>
> I am mounting from my linux redhat 6.0 other non-linux unix systems by
> NFS (OSF1 - compaq , HPUX 10.x ....).
> There is some mess up with the uid and gid, cause I can't access into
> directories I should have permision too.
>
> It is quite strange - I see on the mounted directory the owner in 'ls
> -al' correctly (right owner and group). So all is well, but ....
> When I try to do opperations , I see that only the 'other' premisions
> matters.
>
> Am I doing something wrong in my mount options (I tried some
> combinations) ? Any other idea ?
>
> Thanks.


------------------------------

From: Chris Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connecting a Linux Box to a Unix Box
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 20:48:47 -0500

RedHat 5.0 and 5.2 (haven't tried 6.0 yet; the box is 2000 miles away
from me right now) both failed to detect my D-Link ISA NE2000 clone.
I had to use my knowledge of Slackware and the assorted boot files
to slap the NIC in there.  (The card was running non-PnP mode.  
Normally I just compile NE2000 ISA support into the kernel and let it
find it at boot, but I decided to do it "the right way" for once and
start using modules...)

One of the reasons my (eventual ;) distribution of Linux will do a
"pnp" run through all the available modules and probe at boot...


bryan wrote:
> 
> bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kuds  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> : | I have around 20 P233MMX machines connected to a Unix box. I
> : | have installed RH52 on 2 of these machines. My problem is
> : |
> : | 1. I dont know the make of the nic nor can i open the
> : | machine and find out, i suspect it to be a tulip, but dont
> : | take my word on this. Does anybody have ne ideas on how to
> : | find this out and also how to install the card
> 
> : What we need is "SuperProbe" for NICs, I totally agree, and I have a NIC
> : in my hand and still can't identify it, since IBM rebranded it.
> 
> the redhat (and others') installs basically autodetect most nics out
> there.  I agree there should be a probe-nic utility - we just need to
> grab the stuff from the installation sourcekit and make a commandline
> tool from it.
> 
> --
> Bryan [at] Grateful.Net
> http://www.Grateful.Net

------------------------------

From: "Jean-Christophe Dhellemmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: vt100 documentation and parsing
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:17:57 +0200

I am trying to write a program that needs to parse vt100/ansi terminal
escape sequences. Any pointer to the full vt100/ANSI escape sequences
technical documention and/or any parsing source code would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Jean-Christophe Dhellemmes
SISRO, SA (www.sisro.com)




------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to