Linux-Networking Digest #892, Volume #11 Wed, 14 Jul 99 11:13:42 EDT
Contents:
Mgetty and AutoPPP (Steve Bradshaw)
Samba - nothing works (not even...) (max)
Re: linux with a winmodem (Duncan Simpson)
Re: Firewall recommendations/advice - Would this work? (Duncan Simpson)
Re: LINUX - SMTP works too good (Duncan Simpson)
Re: Kingston KNE-2000T+ and Linux (Terrelle Shaw)
Re: cable modem and network hub.. ("Eric Pearson")
Re: 100 Base-T & 32bit 33MHz PCI (Rod Smith)
Help on Email list (vineet)
Re: rlogin/rsh (John Strange)
Samba PC doesn't show up on Win-Box (VBF-Ratingen GmbH)
Internet (T-Online) and TCP/IP (VBF-Ratingen GmbH)
Re: rlogin/rsh ("William R. Mattil")
Re: Ping problem: ARP ? ("G.C.")
Sendmail authentication??? (mike)
Re: SynOptics Communications ("William R. Mattil")
Re: DHCP, 10BaseT, RH 6.0? (Scott Marlowe)
Sendmail relay-not a regular relay (mike)
Re: Executing program on an NFS partition... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Samba needs password for $IPC (Dan Chak)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mgetty and AutoPPP
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:11:06 +0100
Hi,
I'm attempting to set up a Redhat 6.0 box as a dial-in server and have
followed the HOWTOs and got mgetty answering the phone. However, when I
use Win95 to dial in the line is dropped with the message 'You have been
disconnected, please double-click the connection to try again'
So, I created a user called ppp1 and med their shell pppd and tried that
- it still dropped the line.
I tried dialing in with hyperterm and got a standard shell login for my
normal accout and an error regarding .ppprc for the pppd account.
I've attached the mgetty log for the standard account to the end of this
post .
I thought that AutoPPP was supposed to kick in and do pap and ppp on the
normal account. Is it?
I havn't re-compiled mgetty, I'm using the one taht came with Redhat 6,
is that OK or should I re-compile.
I've created a .ppprc file in the home directory of the pppd user and
put
-detach
in it. Is that OK?
Also what IP address will be given to the incoming connection? Does it
just use the DHCP server to get it?
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Please email replies to me as
well as posting them as my access to newsgroups is limited.
My address is steve_AT_mirkwood_DOT_clara_DOT_net
Here's that log:-
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 select returned 1
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 checking lockfiles, locking the line
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 makelock(ttyS1) called
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 do_makelock: lock='/var/lock/LCK..ttyS1'
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 lock made
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 waiting for ``RING''
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 got: [0d]
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 CND: OK[0a]RING ** found **
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 CND: check no: 'none'
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 send: ATA[0d]
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 waiting for ``CONNECT''
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 got: [0d]
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 CND: RING[0a]ATA[0d]
07/14 01:07:30 yS1 CND: ATA[0d][0a]CONNECT ** found **
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 send:
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 waiting for ``_''
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 got: 33600/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS[0d]
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 CND: CONNECT 33600/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 CND: found: 33600/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS[0a] ** found
**
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 waiting for line to clear (VTIME), read:
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 looking for utmp entry... (my PID: 837)
07/14 01:07:41 yS1 utmp + wtmp entry made
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 tio_set_flow_control( HARD )
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 print welcome banner (/etc/issue)
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 getlogname (AUTO_PPP), read:~[ff]}#[c0]!
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 input finished with '\r', setting ICRNL ONLCR
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 tio_get_rs232_lines: status: RTS CTS DSR DTR DCD
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 login: use login config file
/etc/mgetty+sendfax/login.config
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 match: user='/AutoPPP/', key=''
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 match: user='/AutoPPP/', key=''
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 match: user='/AutoPPP/', key='/AutoPPP/'*** hit!
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 calling login: cmd='/usr/sbin/pppd', argv[]='pppd
file /etc/ppp/options.server'
07/14 01:07:42 ##### data dev=ttyS1, pid=837, caller='none',
conn='33600/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS', name='', cmd='/usr/sbin/pppd',
user='/AutoPPP/'
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 setenv: 'CALLER_ID=none'
07/14 01:07:42 yS1 setenv: 'CONNECT=33600/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS'
--
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.14-Apr02
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 check for lockfiles
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 checklock: stat failed, no file
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 locking the line
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 makelock(ttyS1) called
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 do_makelock: lock='/var/lock/LCK..ttyS1'
07/14 01:07:45 yS1 lock made
07/14 01:07:46 yS1 tio_get_rs232_lines: status: RTS CTS DSR DTR
07/14 01:07:46 yS1 lowering DTR to reset Modem
07/14 01:07:46 yS1 tss: set speed to 38400 (017)
07/14 01:07:46 yS1 tio_set_flow_control( HARD )
07/14 01:07:46 yS1 waiting for line to clear (VTIME), read: [0d][0a]NO
CARRIER[0d][0a]
07/14 01:07:46 yS1 send: \dATQ0V1H0[0d]
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 waiting for ``OK''
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 got: ATQ0V1H0[0d]
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 CND: ATQ0V1H0[0d][0a]OK ** found **
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 send: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d]
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 waiting for ``OK''
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 got: [0d]
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 CND: OK[0a]ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d]
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 CND: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d][0a]OK ** found **
07/14 01:07:47 yS1 waiting for line to clear (VTIME), read: [0d][0a]
07/14 01:07:48 yS1 removing lock file
07/14 01:07:48 yS1 waiting...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (max)
Subject: Samba - nothing works (not even...)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:14:39 +0200
Hi,
I've tried everything by now, including following the instructions on
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/
and
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
And most every possible configuration setting in smb.conf.
Whatever I do, I can make my Linux machine show up in the workgroup, but
when I try to open it I get:
Added interface ip=194.7.x.x bcast=194.7.x.x nmask=255.255.255.0
session request to 194.7.x.x failed
session request to *SMBSERVER failed
A windows machine just tells me that the server didn't recieve my request.
The smb.log says this:
[1999/07/14 13:07:03, 0] locking/shmem.c:smb_shm_open(930)
ERROR smb_shm_open : mmap failed with code Invalid argument
[1999/07/14 13:07:03, 0] locking/locking.c:locking_init(169)
ERROR: Failed to initialise share modes!
Any ideas? why the "mmap failed with code Invalid argument"?
Thanks,
Manfred
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Subject: Re: linux with a winmodem
Date: 14 Jul 1999 11:21:32 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ian Shrimpton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi,
>does anyone know of a way to connect my linux laptop the net
>with a v.90 winmodem?
>thanks!
The short answer is, no these are not supported.
The longer answer is that they could be supported armed with the
proper V90 knowledge and programming specs. A few folks who might have
been in a position to write a driver have asked for programming
information and so far exactly 0 manufacturers have supplied any. 99%
of people no longer bother asking. (winmodems get the host CPU to do a
lot of the work, which is undesirable in many cases anyway).
I use an external 56K modem connected by a serial line. This ensures I
get a complete modem and the AT comands, etc are implemented by the
modem.
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Subject: Re: Firewall recommendations/advice - Would this work?
Date: 14 Jul 1999 11:34:54 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erick Thompson) writes:
>In article <A3vh3.438$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
<stuff snipped>
>I thought of doing this, but I was concerned of: my web server being used
>to break into the SQL server. If the web server was broken (possible with
>all those scripts, etc), there is a change that the SQL could system
>fall. I figured that this could happen (remote chance, but possible) as
>the SQL server can get packets from the web server, leaving the way for
>buffer overruns, etc.
<possible security problems of cracked web sevre snipped>
Typically one would place both the database and web server in the
DMZ. One would make sure the database had no information people should
not be reading in it, of course. IF that means a seperate internal database
server then that is what you pay for the security.
>My reasoning on the three network system is that there is no way for
>anything to come from the DMZ into the internal network. Doesn't matter
>where it comes from, everything is rejected at the second firewall. That
>way, if I lose the database, at least the file server is still protected.
You probably need some minimal access from the internal network to the DMZ
machines and vica-versa. In particular you need to pass email... the usual
solution is allowing port 25 for one pair of boxen and have the internal
mail handling box fortified like the stuff in the DMZ (modulo what services
it needs to provide).
Admin acess is well served by ssh. The policy with servers is usually
shell access is only by ssh and limited to a minimal numner of
users. You can insist on specific host public keys too, which
obviosuly helps. Not networked logging host over serial lines for
critical servers are also popular---these are logs no cracker without
physical access can erase and twidling the time on networked machines
will have no effect. (You use these logs when disaster strikes).
[Typically you want some sort of simple summary logs regularly landing
in your mailbox as well.]
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Subject: Re: LINUX - SMTP works too good
Date: 14 Jul 1999 11:40:39 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kristy) writes:
>On Fri, 9 Jul 1999 19:57:27 -0400, "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>By the way how amny accounts are you supporting on your Linux mail
>>server?
>about 125 active users with no problems other than extremely large
>attachments (which I'm trying to kill)
sendmail has a parameter that you can set to put a maximum size per
mail. This should help stop massive avi files and 100Mb emails (which
can make small mail servers *very* unstable). One server I know crashed
badly when procmail used all the real memory+swap space failing to
deliver it (to add insult to injury rebooting caused another delivery
attempt with the same result). The content of the mail suggest it was
not malicious but some uncool M$ software bug.
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: Terrelle Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kingston KNE-2000T+ and Linux
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:36:01 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've run across a couple of these NICs and need to know if you have
> gotten this Kingston 10T card to work with Linux. It is a fairly plain
> card, but I haven't been able to find any info on it in the usual places
> (HOW-TOs, etc.).
>
> Please help...thanks!
>
> -David
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Look at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html for info..
------------------------------
From: "Eric Pearson" <misterp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cable modem and network hub..
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:18:12 GMT
I had a question, does Roadrunner offer static IP's? And with Roadrunner,
do you have to masquerade or can you use more than one IP at a time?
Patrick Chipman wrote in message <7mhebk$llh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Bad Mojo wrote:
>
>> Now the cable modem is hooked to my nic, it currently is not plugged into
>> my network hub. Now I was wondering, what would happen, if anything if I
>> were to take the network cable that is running out of the modem and into
>> the nic card and plugged that into my hub, and take a nic cable from the
>> hub and plug it into the nic?
>>
>> Would this work? Would anything happen?
>>
>> BTW - my network is just 2 computers. 1 is linux, other is ms windows.
> Well, what would happen is a lost cable modem connection if you don't
>plug the cable modem into the uplink port of the hub (if you don't have an
>uplink port, you'll need to get a crossover cable to make the connection).
>At least, this is what I've heard and it sounds reasonable (the cable modem
>emulates a hub?).
> Once the cable modem is talking to the hub, each machine will need to be
>able to log into the cable modem service. This shouldn't be a problem for
>the Windows box, but for the Linux box you'll either need another static IP
>address and the relevant servers (so the story with @Home goes) or a copy
>of rrlogind, dhcpcd, and a new IP address lease if you use Roadrunner. Of
>course, if your Linux machine was running the service before, you already
>know how to set it up and so will merely need the relevant Windows software
>(if any).
> After the software is installed, it should simply be a matter of placing
>the appropriate IP addresses in the computers or configuring the DHCP
>client.
> Be aware, however, that a cable modem setup over a hub is extremely
>insecure and suffers from some major disadvantages, especially over
>Roadrunner. The better (and safer!) solution would be to set up two NICs in
>the Linux box and run it as an IP Masquerade router for your network.
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: 100 Base-T & 32bit 33MHz PCI
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:48:19 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Posted and mailed]
In article <7mfphk$ncm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> What OSes?
>
> The tests were conducted using (if I recall correctly) win98 & NT
> clients and NT and Novell servers.
>
>> I've got a three-computer network running assorted
>> combinations of Linux, OS/2, MacOS, Windows 98, and Windows NT.
>> I've not done all possible comparisons, but I typically get between
>> 10 and 30Mbps on network transfers, depending upon the protocols
>> I use and what OSes are involved.
>
> 30Mbps is well below media capacity, even if you are using hubs with
> a fair amount of traffic.
Yes, but it's also above the 20Mbps claimed as the maximum throughput
under ideal conditions -- and my system isn't exactly operating under
ideal conditions, since it uses a hub (hence half duplex and more
collisions).
--
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
Author of _Special Edition Using WordPerfect for Linux_, from Que
------------------------------
From: vineet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Help on Email list
Date: 14 Jul 1999 13:31:02 GMT
I want the documentation on runnig majordomos or email lists. Can anybody
point me the URL for this
TIA
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange)
Subject: Re: rlogin/rsh
Date: 14 Jul 1999 12:51:26 GMT
did you do a
chmod 600 .rhosts
James Sasitorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have a clean installation of Mandrake/Redhat Linux 6.0. Im having
: troubles getting rlogin to work properly. all I get is the ": Connection
: refused" The hosts.allow and hosts.deny are currently empty. I setup a
: host.equiv... tried a ~/.rhosts both with a one liner with my hostname..
: and ideas?
: thanks,
: james
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
From: VBF-Ratingen GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba PC doesn't show up on Win-Box
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:47:55 +0200
HI there!!!
I have a Win9x-net (TCP/IP) with one linux box. I can access the Win9x
using Samba, but the linux box doesn't show up in the Network
Neighbourhood on the Win9x-PCs :-(.... I can ping the linux-PC from the
Win9x-PCs, so the network is working properly.... Any ideas????
------------------------------
From: VBF-Ratingen GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Internet (T-Online) and TCP/IP
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:50:32 +0200
HI there!!!
I have a WIn9x-net with one linux server (Samba)... For using Samba, i
gave the WIn9x-PCs IP-Adresses (192.168.1.1 - 192.168.3.1). This works
:)
But, i have a question: one PC in the net has got a access to the
Internet, using T-Online... If I set a _fix_ IP-Number, will T-Online go
on working properly???
Thanks!!
Rainer.
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rlogin/rsh
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:24:02 -0500
James Sasitorn wrote:
> I have a clean installation of Mandrake/Redhat Linux 6.0. Im having
> troubles getting rlogin to work properly. all I get is the ": Connection
> refused" The hosts.allow and hosts.deny are currently empty. I setup a
> host.equiv... tried a ~/.rhosts both with a one liner with my hostname..
> and ideas?
>
You have to make sure that the .rhosts file is mode 600 for security
reasons.
Regards
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: "G.C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ping problem: ARP ?
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:10:08 -0400
Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>
> What's the purpose of dummy0 interface?
>
> G.C. wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Anyone can identify this problem ?
> >Thanks
> >Gilles
Used mainly with the ppp or slip connection. But I checked that if it is
not there, my ppp connection works as well.
Even without the dummy device, I get the same problems with my
Win95-Linux box connection.
Gilles
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general,redhat.servers.general
Subject: Sendmail authentication???
Date: 14 Jul 1999 14:31:04 GMT
I was wondering if Sendmail or other package supports user AUTHENTICATION
for sending e-mail. I'm not taking about POP3 or IMAP but about SMTP
authentication.
This feature would fix a lots of problems regarding unauthorized RELAY: so
if you want to send an e-mail using that server you should be first
AUTHENTICATE.
VdG
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.sys.bay-networks
Subject: Re: SynOptics Communications
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:19:46 -0500
Well, from the looks of it you have the connection correct since you can see
data. If the ctl Y doesn't work it is most likely due to minicom screwing that
up. I would suggest using cu instead. man cu will give you the details. I use
this to access cisco routers all the time.
Regards
Bill
zeek wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm having great difficulty reprogramming a SynOptics LattisHub 2813. I'm
> using a regular "out of the box" DB9 cable (only a gender bender adapter is
> connected) and interfacing via the minicom program on a Linux box. When
> I reset the hub, I see this...
>
> -------------------start------------------------
> Model 281X IP/IPX BOOT PROM Rev: D, Date: Feb 03 1993
> Power-On Self Test
> Test #1 Boot ROM Checksum Test...Boot ROM Checksum Test Passed
> Test #2 LCA Test...LCA Test Passed
> Test #3 Memory Test
> .......................................................
> Memory Test Passed
> Test #4 FLASH Checksum Test...FLASH Checksum Test Passed
> Test #5 EEPROM Checksum Test...EEPROM Checksum Test Passed
> On Board : Local Image Version 5.1.0
> Test #6 CNMI Test...CNMI Test Passed
> Test #7 NIC Test...NIC Test Passed
> Type ^C to go to the Boot Menu
>
> Image File Loading From FLASH...Loaded Image
>
> ***************************************
> * Copyright (c) 1992 *
> * SynOptics Communications, Inc. *
> * All Rights Reserved *
> * Date: May 21 1993, Time: 19:40:14 *
> * Model 281X Version 5.1.0 *
> ***************************************
> Model type/revision: 2813/0
>
> Press CTRL-Y to begin
> -------------------end------------------------
>
> But when I press ctrl-y, nothing happens. I've changed the settings on
> minicom, used a NM adapter on the cable, and prayed for rain but nothing
> gives. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> -zeek(kevintkruzich)
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP, 10BaseT, RH 6.0?
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:32:45 -0600
Brad Staff wrote:
> Has anyone succeeded in setting up Red Hat 6.0 on a 10BaseT network using
> DHCP? The Workstation installation appears to go smoothly, finds my network
> card, allows me to select DHCP, etc. When booting, "lo" and "eth0"
> supposedly initialize properly, but I am unable to ping other machines on
> the network. The light on the 10BaseT hub comes on briefly when "eth0"
> initializes, but is off otherwise. Thoughts?
Had the same problem. After the machine comes up, run a term, then su - and
type in dhcpcd and see if you get a lease. If so, then you need to add dhcpcd
to your init.rc files.
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Sendmail relay-not a regular relay
Date: 14 Jul 1999 14:31:05 GMT
Hi,
Some people might say that is stupid what I want but this I know what i'm
taking about:
I have sendmail 8.9.3 and I want all clients originating from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to relay to any host that they want.
Let me explain why I need this configuration:
I have some clients that are travelling a lot and are conecting to
Internet using diferrent ISPs- all of them wants to use their "home" e-
mail server to send e-mails, so as long as the "from" fiels is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] they should relay to everyone.
I take the risk of exposing my mail server to spmmers...I know that..but I
don't have what to do:(
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Executing program on an NFS partition...
Date: 14 Jul 1999 13:34:09 GMT
try giving the 'exec' option when mounting! Just where you'd
give the rsize etc options, where in /etc/fstab you often find
'defaults'.
Bye,
Mike
In comp.os.linux.networking David Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I have a problem with NFS. I can't execute any programs. I can read and
: write just fine . my /etc/exports file options are (rw,no_root_squad)
: and my /etc/fstab options are user,auto,rw. Also, I can telnet into the
: server and execute any program on the same partition so the binaries are
: working. BTW, both machines are pretty much stock RH6 machines. The
: client does have an upgraded kernel (2.2.10) but that is the only
: signicficant difference.
--
<< the above email addr might disappear, reply to: >>
<< Michael.Sievers -(at)- desy.de >>
Black holes are where God divided by zero.
------------------------------
From: Dan Chak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba needs password for $IPC
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:03:12 -0400
Does anyone have any idea of why my linux box running samba is asking
for a password for service $IPC? I was using my own custom
configuration and this was happening, and then I tried using the
smb.conf from /usr/doc/samba/simple and I still have the same error.
I am using RH6.0. When I had RH5.2 I was able to get samba running with
no problem.
Thanks (&please CC: my email address),
Dan
--
=========================================================================
dan chak ! 372 memorial drive ! cambridge, ma 02139 ! (617)621-1369
x1625
=========================================================================
http://thebox.mit.edu "more pineapple please!"
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
