Linux-Networking Digest #896, Volume #11 Wed, 14 Jul 99 18:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly (Elchonon Edelson)
Re: Little Bit of Help with NE2000 Problem ... ("Ben Price")
Re: X Terminal Under Linux - Where can I get the software? (Greg Weeks)
Kernel 2.2.10 doesn't route ? (Sven Goldt)
Compaq 7400 PCMCIA 3Com problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Automatic Dial on Demand every 15 minutes ("Robert Daumann")
Ipfwadm and ftp ("Johan Ahlstrom")
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Philip Brown)
DHCPd & dual homed server ("Allan Wingenback")
Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PCMCIA Ethernet networking problem ("Erik D. Hansen")
Re: LINUX - SMTP works too good ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly (Elchonon Edelson)
Where can I find the docs for netcfg? (John H. Chauvin)
SIOCADDRT Network not reachable ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
lan to lan routing (Min Hu)
RH6.0 dials at Boot ("Ragman")
Can't isolate samba mount issue (Derek M Streeter)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Elchonon Edelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 19:07:21 GMT
Philip Allen Johnson wrote:
>
> Derek --
>
> Thanks for your input. I have tried your suggestions, but I am afraid
> they didn't work.
>
> the file /etc/conf.modules on both the working and the non-working
> machines are identical. Currently they contain:
>
> alias eth0 eepro100
> alias eth1 ne
> options ne io=0x240
>
> The modules eepro100.o and ne.0 both are in the directory
> /lib/modules/preferred/net.
>
> When I executed the "/sbin/modprobe eth0" command, the response was:
"ifup eth0" would be a much more apropriate command.
> conf:3: missing module arguement
Dunno what that means.
> When I did the init 1 and init 3 it still reported delaying eth0 (and
> eth1) initialization.
If the computer is unable to initialize the device, changing
the runlevel really won't help you much.
> I also tried a more specific /etc/conf.modules of:
>
> alias eth0 eepro100
> alias eth1 ne
> options ne io=0x240 irq=3
> options eepro100 io=0xe800 irq=10
If you are aliasing eepro100 to eth0, why are you then setting
options on eepro100? shouldn't you set the options on eth0?
Anyway, the eepro100 driver shouldnt need to be told the options.
> No success but more information. The following is from the same area of
> the startup as before:
>
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET 3.035
> insmod: /lib/modules/preferred/net/eepro100.o symbol for parameter io
> not found
It says "symbol for parameter io not found". That means, you've
specified
a parameter named "io" to the module, and it doesn't know what to do
with
it. Looking at the source code for the eepro100 driver, I see that it
only
accepts one parameter, being named "debug". I would theorize that it
is
capable of figuring out anything it needs by itself.
> loading device 'eth0'...
> ne.c:V1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> ne*000 ethercard probe at 0x240 00 40 05 6d 9f 00
> eth0: ne2000 found at 0x240 using IRQ3
> loading device 'eth1'...
> delaying eth1 initialization
>
> Now my analysis would be that it could not start the Intel on-board chip
> with the eepro100 driver on eth0. Then it successfully started the
> linksys isa card and called it eth0. Does that make sense?
>
> Any other suggestions?
Yes. remove the ne card and see what it takes to get the eepro100
to function by itself. from there it should be much easier to get
them both working together.
> Derek Burnheim wrote:
[snip]
> > To get your cards working try this:
> >
> > modprobe eth0
> > modprobe eth1
> > init 1
> > init 3
Load the modules for the drivers, switch to runlevel 1, single user
mode,
which stops most services, then go back to the default runlevel, which
causes init to rerun the start scripts for those services, including
networking.
You might want to have a look at the ifup and ifdown commands, which
are
meant to bring up and down specific network devices, and if you are
running
redhat (and probably some other distribs, but I don't know them) you
can
bring up and down the entire networking subsystem with
"/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop"
and "/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start".
> > I don't know why that should work. I wish it didn't, but it did just today.
> > For me anyway. Which leads to my first question.
[SNIP!]
> > As I understand it, by invoking modprobe manually I force the kernel to load
> > the drivers and then with the init 1/init 5 I restart the networking, with
> > both cards' drivers loaded. I could probably kludge this at startup by
> > utilising an extra run-level and an appropriate script in the relevant rcX.d
> > directory, but I'd kind of like to know how to do it properly :)
Sounds right. See above.
> > Sorry for the long-windedness. All advice appreciated.
> >
> > TIA
> > Derek
--
Elchonon Edelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IntelliSoft Corp. http://isoft.com/
------------------------------
From: "Ben Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: Little Bit of Help with NE2000 Problem ...
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:26:07 +0100
I had this problem with my NE2000 card for a while. The solution in my case
was to run a MS-DOS based setup program off a boot floppy and use it to blow
perminate I/o and IRQ values into the cards EEPROM. This allows the kernel
to recognise the card, as before it was in PnP mode and Linux wasn't setting
it up. Isapnp worked, but lost all the settings if you powered down.
If your card has a dos configuration program try lowring yourself and using
that, it worked for me. I used the defaults of i/o 0x0340 and IRQ 11.
As for the bzLilo/Image stuff, as far as I (a self confessed newbie) can
make out the 2.2 series kernels are bigger than the old 2.0 series, and if
you just zImage them you get a kernel image that is too large to boot.
bzImage does some extra compression, allowing you to have big zImage.
Bp.
Desmond Coughlan wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a slight configuration problem trying to get my NE2000 card
>recognised undezrt Slackware 4.0.
>
>I run KDE (bloody lovely window manager, by the way), and get into
>/usr/src/linux-2.2.6/
>
>I run make xconfig; just like I did with my old 486. I enable network
>devices, and specify an ISA NE2000-compatible card.
>
>I then save and exit, and it tells me to run 'make bzlilo'. I do, and
>then reboot, but get the message: eth0 no such device.
>
>What is all this 'bzlilo' stuff, anyway? I used to run 'make dep',
>'make clean', and then 'make zlilo', and all was hunky-dory. I tried
>that as well, and it didn't work.
>
>Has something been changed with regard to NIC recognition? Is this a
>known problem? Am I missing something? Am I stupid?
>
>Answers on a postcard to ...
>
>:-)
>--
>Desmond Coughlan |Restez Zen ... Linux peut le faire
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[www site under construction]
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: X Terminal Under Linux - Where can I get the software?
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:25:45 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The X-Terminal (its an "hardware" X-Server that has no hard disk, just a screen,
> keyboard and mouse plus a few ports including BNC network).
> Actually its a Sun 3/50 (well, we have more than one, some higher specs) which of
> course needs its own version of the X-Server in order to work correctly with Linux.
>
> There is a hacked Xkernel for Linux and this version of the Sun terminal but I dont
> know where to get hold of it.
The last time I looked there wasn't an X terminal package that uses
Linux as the OS for the sun3 machines. There is a nice one for the
sun4c machines. This doesn't mean that you can't use a sun3 or sun3x
as an X terminal from Linux, only that the X terminal will be running
a version of SunOS rather than linux. You might fing this site
usefull, I did.
http://www.sfn.saskatoon.sk.ca/~aa113/sunxterm.html
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: Sven Goldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel 2.2.10 doesn't route ?
Date: 14 Jul 1999 19:31:17 GMT
Hi,
i connect to my ISP with isdn/ipppd. After i got connected i can
only reach hosts on the same subnet where my ippp0 is in. The default
route is set to ippp0 and the most strange thing is - traceroute can
show me the path to hosts in the outside world, but ping can't reach
them nor telnet nor ftp - no chance.
So where is the problem ? I upgraded everything mentioned in the
Change file (net-tools, ... ) but i can't leave the subnet.
Greets, Sven
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Compaq 7400 PCMCIA 3Com problem
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:01:20 GMT
Symptom:
NIC in PCMCIA slot not recognized by Linux
RedHat 5.2.
Cardmgr daemon up and running fine. Typing
"cardctl ident" spits out all info on both cards
in PCMCIA slots (also have 56k modem in there)
System:
Compaq Armada 7400 with a 3Com 589E Ethernet Card.
Linux 5.2 installed cleanly (execpt for network
config.....it cannot find the device.)
During initial Linux install, PCMCIA services were
installed. I believe the services were installed
successfully because:
1) There were no errors during install
2) Doing a "lsmod" reveals that the core PCMCIA
svcs are there.
I have tried the card by itself in BOTH slots. I
have taken a 589C card from a friends Compaq (NOT
a 7400) and tried it and it is still not
recognized (this same card works fine in his
Compaq).
To me it sounds like there are problems with
my PCMCIA services. I re-installed Linux
(actually went from 5.1 to 5.2 and did a clean
install) and Linux still cannot see ANY NIC in my
PCMCIA slots.
"dmesg | grep eth0" show me that it does not see
the card during boot. I also tried warm re-boot
from windows and then a cold boot (heard sometimes
the cards work if the interface is still intact
from when windows was booted)
If cardctl can see the cards, what am I missing??
Help!
-DG
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Robert Daumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Automatic Dial on Demand every 15 minutes
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:34:44 +0200
Hi to all Linux friends
I have a problem
I'm running a network with a linux SuSE 6.1. At the linux machine there are
running apache, a dhcp-server, nameserver (bind 8), mailserver, a
proxyserver (squid) and samba. The connect to the internet is over ISDN.
The 3Com-card has a diffrent private Class-C networkadress than the
ISDN-card. The nameserver is installed, cause squid need the contact to a
nameserver during boot up and I don't want a active connect at boot up.
Now every 15 minutes the server starts the ISDN interface and contact the
nameserver outside. There were sent out 240 bytes and 249 bytes are coming
in. The files at the local nameserver have no flag with a time of 15 minutes
or 900 seconds.
In the messages log file there is the following entry:
192.168.100.25 ->194.25.0.124 (UDP) 1024 -> 53
the private IP is the adress from the ISDN-interface.
I've looked in all conf-files but i didn't found the right time flag.
Does anyone have an idea what's wrong???
please email me the answer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Robert
------------------------------
From: "Johan Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ipfwadm and ftp
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:20:29 +0200
Hi,
Im running Redhat Linux 5.2 and using ipfwadm as a firewall.
Does ipfwadm support the ftp protocol?.
Im using ip masqrading and ipportforwarding, and yes the masqrading module
(ip_masq_ftp) is implemented and working.
matter a fact, the client can connect and use the ftp server on the inside
of our firewall if he doesn�t have a firewall of his own??.
If the client is behind a firewall and trying to connect through our
firewall he can connect to the ftp server but he can not list anything.
Sometimes the error message below shows to the client.
192.168.*.* mismatch 195.84.*.*,
where the first adress is the clients address from the private network and
the other is his eject address.
I have also tried to use passive mode transfer but the same error shows.
Please help me!, there must be someone out there who have had the same
problem, and there must be a solution.
Thanks in advance
/Johan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14 Jul 1999 20:24:42 GMT
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:27:12 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
>The World Series is named after the newspaper that sponsored the Series
>when it started, The Boston World, OSLT
funny, I thought the boston newspaper with a name like that was
"The boston GLOBE"
--
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
--------------------------------------------------
The word of the day is mispergitude
------------------------------
From: "Allan Wingenback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCPd & dual homed server
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 21:18:50 GMT
I have RH Linux 5.2 installed on a box I want to use as a server and an
internet gateway for a small network (5-10 win95 clients). This server has
2 network cards and I want to use DHCPd to provide network addresses to the
internal computers only. My network setup is good, and I've installed dhcpd
and written the dhcpd.conf file as per the mini-HOWTO for my internal subnet
address range. When I start the dhcpd service, it reports "No Subnet
declaration for eth0 (184.161.y.y)" which is the Internet interface. Since
I don't want to send DHCP info to the Internet, how do we configure
dhcpd.conf to not use eth0?
My configuration:
External (Internet) NIC: eth0, 161.184.y.y, subnet 255.255.255.248, 3c509b
Internal NIC: eth1, 192.168.x.x, subnet 255.255.255.0, 3c509b
Allan Wingenbach
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:17:33 GMT
Do you have a line in your lilo config file to specifically load the
cards at specific addresses? It's in a book at home, but it's
something like: append="eth0=0x300,3, eth1=0x340,5" in the lilo config
file. I had to do this when I ran 2 cards. If you don't have that,
post a reply, and I'll dig up the book.
-kl
> Derek --
>
> Thanks for your input. I have tried your suggestions, but I am afraid
> they didn't work.
>
> the file /etc/conf.modules on both the working and the non-working
> machines are identical. Currently they contain:
>
> alias eth0 eepro100
> alias eth1 ne
> options ne io=0x240
>
> The modules eepro100.o and ne.0 both are in the directory
> /lib/modules/preferred/net.
>
> When I executed the "/sbin/modprobe eth0" command, the response was:
>
> conf:3: missing module arguement
>
> When I did the init 1 and init 3 it still reported delaying eth0 (and
> eth1) initialization.
>
> I also tried a more specific /etc/conf.modules of:
>
> alias eth0 eepro100
> alias eth1 ne
> options ne io=0x240 irq=3
> options eepro100 io=0xe800 irq=10
>
> No success but more information. The following is from the same area
of
> the startup as before:
>
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET 3.035
> insmod: /lib/modules/preferred/net/eepro100.o symbol for parameter io
> not found
> loading device 'eth0'...
> ne.c:V1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> ne*000 ethercard probe at 0x240 00 40 05 6d 9f 00
> eth0: ne2000 found at 0x240 using IRQ3
> loading device 'eth1'...
> delaying eth1 initialization
>
> Now my analysis would be that it could not start the Intel on-board
chip
> with the eepro100 driver on eth0. Then it successfully started the
> linksys isa card and called it eth0. Does that make sense?
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Derek Burnheim wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I'm probably going to get a lot wrong here, but I may have a
few
> > answers, and I definitely have some questions along the way :)
> >
> > >The second machine will not start either eth0 or eth1.
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> > >The problem seems to be a little further down:
> > >
> > >INIT: Entering runlevel: 3
> > >Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
> > >IPX Portions Copyrighted (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> > >Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
> > >Delaying eth0 initialization
> > >modprobe: can't locate module eth1
> > >Delaying eth1 initialization
> >
> > First problem to deal with is that the /etc/conf.modules file
contains a
> > line like "alias eth1 xxxxx[.o]"
> >
> > xxxxx.o needs to be in /lib/modules/linux2.0.34 and it's apparently
not.
> > Copy it over from your working machine or check for a typo in the
line.
> >
> > To get your cards working try this:
> >
> > modprobe eth0
> > modprobe eth1
> > init 1
> > init 3
> >
> > I don't know why that should work. I wish it didn't, but it did
just today.
> > For me anyway. Which leads to my first question.
> >
> > I have built a box for my office so that we can all access the
internet from
> > our desktops without using up our preciously small C-class address
range. I
> > compiled a 2.2.10 kernel with IP masquerading enabled (I assume this
was
> > necessary; I certainly couldn't get IP masquerading to work under
the RedHat
> > 2.0.36 kernel), and fitted the machine with two ethernet cards. One
of the
> > cards is hooked up to a router, the other to a hub on our office
network.
> > By using the Linux box as the default gateway all our machines can
see the
> > Internet, but only the Linux box (which acts as our web and mail
server) can
> > be seen from the Internet. Or at least I hope so.
> >
> > Anyway, the whole thing works beautifully, and I get a warm glowwy
feeling
> > whenever someone uses the web or email (it took me two weeks to get
it
> > going, and that was on Monday :) ), except that neither of the
ethernet
> > cards are enabled when the system is started up. I have to go
through that
> > whole modprobe/init crap to get them to appear.
> >
> > As I understand it, by invoking modprobe manually I force the kernel
to load
> > the drivers and then with the init 1/init 5 I restart the
networking, with
> > both cards' drivers loaded. I could probably kludge this at startup
by
> > utilising an extra run-level and an appropriate script in the
relevant rcX.d
> > directory, but I'd kind of like to know how to do it properly :)
> >
> > Sorry for the long-windedness. All advice appreciated.
> >
> > TIA
> > Derek
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Erik D. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: PCMCIA Ethernet networking problem
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:43:18 -0400
Sounds like you ethernet card is deaf...
Is this after a warm reboot into Linux from Windows? I've found problems
with PCMCIA cards after a warm reboot from Windows. Does this same thing
happen if you cold start your machine into Linux?
Erik
Mike Carden wrote:
> Hey, thanks for responding ..
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, crayfish
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Mike Carden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >You might have to give us your configuration instead of just writing
> >that everything is ok :) In fact, if something is not working, there
> >has to be a problem, and I do not think this is a interrupt prob (as
> >somebody else wrote).
> >
>
> Fair comment, but what's wrong? Where should I be looking?
>
> What config files should I post to help?
>
> >1. Can you see the replys on your linux box?
>
> Nothing at all.
>
> >
> >2. How did you connect your linux box?
>
> Didn't touch a thing apart from reboot into Linux rather than win98
>
> > Do you get any other traffic to
> >your linux box (can you telnet to it)? If not, there might be a prob
> >with your wiring.
>
> No traffic on the cable gets recognised at all.
>
> Can not be a cable problem as the other os works fine.
>
> >
> >greetings, Crayfish
>
> Any ideas?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >> I've a big problem which none of the documentation has helped with!
> >
> >> Configuration:-
> >
> >> Pentium II laptop with Xircom Realport 10/100+Modem 56
> >> Redhat 6.0 new install.
> >
> >> Problem.
> >
> >> The hardware works fine with win95/98/nt including the xircom
> >
> >> I get a real weird problem with linux 6.0.
> >
> >> The linux machine puts packets onto the network with no problem.
> >> I can see them with a sniffer.
> >> They are mainly arp packets of course until I manually add an entry via
> >> arp -s for another machine.
> >> When I do this and then a ping, I see the icmp traffic in both
> >> directions with the sniffer. The linux box sees no replys ( the led on
> >> the xircom flickers though as one would expect ).
> >
> >> ifconfig -a reports no packets RX TX or collisions.
> >
> >> network addresses, netmasks etc are all correct and the other machine
> >> populates it's MAC arp table with the linux boxes ether address
> >> correctly.
> >
> >> Anybody got any ideas?
> >
> >> Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> Mike Carden
>
> --
> Mike Carden
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LINUX - SMTP works too good
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:40:23 GMT
well you could do it several diffant ways. one way is to set up a
firewall using ipchains. With this mething you can tell the firewall
not to allow any files or pakets have have avi or mov or mpeg or viv or
what ever else is out there. this would completely kill all your
problemes and still allow the normal mail to be sent.. just no
attachments. the other way is to set up filters on your sendmail(not
sure how to do this yet but learning). I would recommend doing both
incase one messes up and the other would be like a fail safe method.
let me know if this works.
James Peterson
Net Admin type person
In article <7mee7a$4ql$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Kristy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just curious...is there a way I can filter attachments using
> > sendmail.cf? For example, I would like to stop all *.avi, *.mov,
etc.
>
> I can't answer your question but I'd thought that wouldn't be too
> effective. THey can just rename the files and the filter would be
useless.
>
> Just a thought....
>
> --
>
========================================================================
==
> Dan Ghozali Ph(H) +61-3-343-1686
> Dept. of Geological Sciences, (W) +61-3-364-2987 ext
7301
> University of Canterbury,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Christchurch - New Zealand
http://members.tripod.com/kiwidan
>
========================================================================
==
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Elchonon Edelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 21:17:30 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Do you have a line in your lilo config file to specifically load the
> cards at specific addresses? It's in a book at home, but it's
> something like: append="eth0=0x300,3, eth1=0x340,5" in the lilo config
> file. I had to do this when I ran 2 cards. If you don't have that,
> post a reply, and I'll dig up the book.
>
> -kl
That is for when the drivers in question are compiled into the kernel,
whereas the person here is using loadable modules. It wasn't until
quite
recently that I actually saw that fact WRITTEN somewhere, but I worked
it out myself when I was starting out with networking drivers.
--
Elchonon Edelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IntelliSoft Corp. http://isoft.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John H. Chauvin)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Where can I find the docs for netcfg?
Date: 14 Jul 1999 20:37:41 GMT
Does anyone know where I can obtain documentation on how
to use netcfg?
John Chauvin
--
John H. Chauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netcom - Online Communication Services San Jose, CA
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SIOCADDRT Network not reachable
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:50:07 GMT
Hi.
WHen my system boots, it states that it has found my ethernet card,
then I see a "SIOCADDRT" immediately after it says that it's found my
ethernet card at 0x300.
Afterwards, when I manually run the following three commands, it fails
on the third command with a "SIOCADDRT Network not reachable" error
message. The first 2 commands run fine.
root# ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
root# route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
root# route add default gw 192.168.1.1 eth0
If anyone can shed some light on this, I would appreciate it. It's
keeping me up at night!
Thanks,
Phillip
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Subject: lan to lan routing
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Min Hu)
Date: 14 Jul 1999 15:38:20 -0500
I am setting up a private network in the following way.
******** ********
======* *====================* *=============
******** ********
150.1.3.1 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.10 128.110.75.10
I use static routing table to have the two linux router boxes talk each other, but I
can not have computers on the two networks 150.1.3.0 and 128.110.75.10 to talk each
other. I set up my routing table in the following way:
ifconfig eth0 150.1.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add -net 150.1.3.0
route add -net 192.168.1.1
route add -net 128.110.75.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.10 metric 3
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 128.110.75.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add -net 192.168.1.0
route add -net 128.110.75.0
route add -net 150.1.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.1 metric 3
when I ping 150.1.3.1 from 128.110.75.10 or ping 128.110.75.10 from 150.1.3.1, both
work. However, when ping 150.1.3.20 from 128.110.75.80 or the other way, none of them
work.
Anybody can enlight my how to solve the problem? Do I need to use gated program to do
it? Thanks very much.
MIN HU
--
HU MIN, University of Toronto, Dept. of Physics
Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M5S 1A7
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Ragman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH6.0 dials at Boot
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:03:17 -0700
I have been attempting to configure my RH6.0 system to automatically dial my
ISP whenever I specify an external address from a browser: either on the
Linux system or from one of the hosts connected via the LAN. Getting
closer, but still not there yet <bummer>. Last night, I did "something"
that caused the system to start dialing as soon as the modem is recognized
(i.e. at boot time or whenever I plug the phone line back into the modem -
it is an internal modem).
Can anyone provide some clues as to where to start looking for the culpret??
Thanks,
P.S.
Does anyone have syntax for setting up an automount of another host when
using Samba 2.0.4b? I can manually set things up using smbmount, but I want
to automatically mount the file shares from a Windows box whenever it
connects via the LAN.
------------------------------
From: Derek M Streeter <"streeter"@@iname.com>
Subject: Can't isolate samba mount issue
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:27:32 GMT
Reply-To: ""streeter\"@@iname.com"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------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
