Linux-Networking Digest #919, Volume #11 Fri, 16 Jul 99 21:13:51 EDT
Contents:
internet link going up ("newsreq")
Re: Novell and Red Hat ("Transnorm System Inc.")
Re: cable modem w/ nonstatic IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Setting up Linux to share PPP connection... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Telnet Requirements? (L J Bayuk)
Re: How to set your hostname? (Rogue Eagle)
Nevermind, I figured it out (Greg Tabaka)
A mess at work on LInux (MIKE MURRAY)
Re: Help! D-link card (Max Riz)
Re: mounting NFS in wierd places ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linksys 10/100 NIC questions (Wolfgang Viechtbauer)
Re: Is samba needed for Linux to ping Win95 computer? ("Terry Cox")
Re: Mapping network drive from Win95? ("Terry Cox")
Diald failure ("Morris Maynard")
Re: Installing Netgear FA310TX card ("Terry Cox")
[HELP] loopback doesn't work (Lei Zheng)
Re: HELP wanted to configure networking... ("Terry Cox")
Re: win95 / linux IP routing? (Monte Phillips)
Re: NFS problems in Redhat Linux 6 (John Doe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "newsreq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: internet link going up
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:52:59 -0000
I have a problem with my internet dialup-connection. It is going up every 10
minutes. I think this problem is caused by named. - It doesn't occur if
named is disabled.
where are the settings telling named to do a request every ten minutes?
regards.
------------------------------
From: "Transnorm System Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Novell and Red Hat
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:39:49 -0500
Nope. My /proc/net/ipx_route shows:
Network Router_Net Router_Node
2AC8A256 00000001 008C82D3AB5
00000001 Directly Connected
The frame is correctly shown under /proc/net/ipx_interface as 802.2 (what my
server is running) and a network id of 0000001 - all which is correct
ncpmount - S (novell servername) gives errors still. (no server found)
slist gives errors still. (no servers found in ncp_open)
This sucks because I see my TX/RX lights flash on the network card when I
slist.
AAAARRRGHH! Help.
Gustin Kiffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7mnntt$khg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [posted and mailed]
> your /proc/net/ipx_interface should say something like
> Network Node_Address Primary Device Frame_Type
> 00000BA5 00AA003B356F Yes eth0 EtherII
> Be very sure the frame type is right. HP Jetdirect Printers
> and Win95 machines can put other frame types on the network
> that your server does NOT use and ipx_interface can get confused. If
> this is the case you will have to use the program ipx_interface
> to force the correct frame type, and perhaps use the program ipx_route
> to add the network number and node address of your server.
>
> What does /proc/net/ipx_route say?
> If it is blank then you have not got the right network number
> or frame type or both and you won't be able to connect to your server.
>
> Your server in /proc/net/ipx_interface will look like
> Network Router_Net Router_Node
> 00000EE3 00000BA5 00AA0034551A
> 00000EE2 00000BA5 00AA0034551A
> 8001020B 00000BA5 00AA0034551A
> 00000BA7 00000BA5 00AA0034551A
> 00000BA1 00000BA5 00AA0034551A
> 00000BA5 00000BA5 Directly Connected
>
> The Router_Node in all the above listings is the router node of your
> server or other IPX router.
>
> You aren't by chance also running mars-netware-emulator on the same
> machine? That can cause problems.
> "Bryan Panella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need help... Bad. I have Red Hat 6 installed and connect mount my
> volumne
> > on my Novell 3.12 server.
> >
> > I followed the instuctions in the HOW-TO IPX primer but no joy. When
> I
> > 'slist' I get an error about no servers found in ncp_mount.
> >
> > I know my net card is working, however since I have TCP/IP
> connecitivity
> > fine to my other servers (and the internet).
> >
> > First I 'ipx_configure --auto_primary=on --auto_interface=on'
> > then I 'cat /proc/net/ipx_interface'
> >
> > which gives me a printout showing the correct IPX Network ID, frame
> type and
> > verifies my primary connection (eth0).
> >
> > I really don't get it. Even trying to force a 'ncpmount' with my
> server
> > name, login id and password feeds back an error that the server
> cannot be
> > found.
> >
> > I even re-compiled the kernel and made sure IPX support, NFS support
> and my
> > net card were built in and not modules. I don't know what I am
> missing.
> >
> > I was tempted to try to install Caldera's Linux for Netware but
> everyone
> > keeps telling me that Red Hat 6 has built-in NFS support so... HELP!
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cable modem w/ nonstatic IP
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:45:50 GMT
Of course there is!!! I run it myself. You need to check out the ipmas
HOWTO. It explains it pretty well. The hardest part for me was getting
my two ethernet cards to work at the same time, after that just a few
settings in linuxconf and you are good to go. Need more help?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Stew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your interest. Is there a way to share an internet
connection
> (cable modem) using IP masq & Samba; even though my "level of service"
does
> not provide a staticIP? That is my cable provider uses DHCP to assign
me a
> new IP every session. I would be willing to leave my RedHat 6.0 box
turned
> on all the time. I have purchased two 3c905's and an 8 port hub but
have
> not yet setup my home LAN. What is the best solution? This is such a
basic
> question it is scary!! If you have general software and/or hardware
> solutions a quick description would be appreciated. Thank you very
much in
> advance.
> Stew
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Setting up Linux to share PPP connection...
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:45:00 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jean-Michel Dault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You just have to start Linuxconf, and do the following steps:
>
> 1-Go to Config/Networking/Routing and Gateways/Set defaults/ and
enable
> Forwarding
> 2-Go to Control files and systems/configure linuxconf modules, and add
> firewall
> 3-Quit and restart Linuxconf
> 4-Go to Networking/Firewalling/Firewalling Defaults
> 5-Add firewalling and special kernel modules (irc, ftp, etc)
> 6-Go to Forward Firewalling, and add a rule
> 7-The rule will control who have access to the internet. check "do
> masquerading", type 192.168.0.0 in the "From" line, and "0.0.0.0" in
the
> "to:" line.
>
> You have full on-line help in Linuxconf
>
> Jean-Michel Dault
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Do you have any other tips because I did all this and still no luck.
In step one I just had "enable routing" in linuxconf.
I'm using RH5.2. It appears I have everything I need. Any ideas to
troubleshoot?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: Telnet Requirements?
Date: 16 Jul 1999 23:28:55 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>What are the required inetd services for a successfully telnet session
>to be transacted? I am trying to minimize active inetd services.
For outgoing telnet (you telnetting to a remote system), none;
for incoming (someone telnetting into your system, just telnetd.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:28:21 +0000
From: Rogue Eagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to set your hostname?
Red hat uses the file /etc/HOSTNAME. You should also check through the
rc.d scripts (rc.sysinit I believe) to make sure it isn't putting a value
in the /etc/HOSTNAME file during bootup. I have RH 5.1 and it did such a
thing. As far as /etc/hosts goes, I believe the 2nd (non-comment) line
is the computer's IP. In other words, the line right after localhost.
Good luck,
Steve
"John H. Chauvin" wrote:
> What configuration files do you typically have to modify if you want to
> change your hostname? I know that you have to modify /etc/hosts and
> most likely /etc/sendmail.cf and/or sendmail.cw. Is this all files I
> should worry about?
>
> By the way, how does a machine know its name. All the /etc/hosts file
> does is relate an IP address to a name. It does not tell the computer
> what its name is. How does a given computer know what its name is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Chauvin
>
> --
> John H. Chauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Netcom - Online Communication Services San Jose, CA
------------------------------
From: Greg Tabaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Nevermind, I figured it out
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:46:33 GMT
I just changed the IRQ to 15 and the I/O to 0x260 in the DOS
utility, made the changes in /etc/conf.modules and shutdown. Then
Linux recognized my changes and the configuration worked. Maybe I'll
make a web page about setting up this type of network; it seems like
a very popular thing to do.
(For some reason, the board in the i486 worked with 0x300 and 3.
Perhaps these were occupied in the K6. Who knows. But it sure is nice
to get 700 kB/s for a file transfer!)
-- GT
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: MIKE MURRAY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: A mess at work on LInux
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:35:35 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have converted my business to using a Linux 6.0 Server with Win 95
clients.
It works great as long as only one of the workstations is accessing the
data files.
When 2 workstations try to access the same files, I getl a sharing
violation on the
Win95 workstation and have to go to the server and kill the workstation
to even
get the Other workstation to move ahead. It happens every time.
I've read pages til my eyes are running red. I just don't know what;
permissions to set or
what to try., but I'm not giving up.
Linux is going to work for us in the end
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: Max Riz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! D-link card
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 19:51:33 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The DE220 runs fine under Linux and is NE2000 compatible
>
> Put it in a DOS machine
> Run the setup utility that came with the card
>
> Turn of Plug and Play
>
> Give it an address ox 0x300, and IRQ 10 ( assuming these are not in
> use by anything else, of course ).
>
> Make sure your Linux kernel has ethernet support for this card !
>
> Hooray ! Now it will work
>
I seem to have a similar problem,
However, after setting the io addys of 330, 320, 340, etc
and irq's of 3 and 15
it refuses to work.
ifconfig tells me that
"ne.c : No NE*000 card found at io = 0x300
....assuming both the card is set to 0x300
and the conf.module lines are
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=300 irq=3
any idea why it refuses to work?
Thanx
-max
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mounting NFS in wierd places
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:02:40 GMT
In article <932139582.751408@anakin>,
"D. Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to mount an NFS volume in a directory that's not empty?
Yes, but not in a way you'd probably find useful.
> As in, I want /home of one machine to be mounted in /home of another.
> There will be no duplicate directories (no duplucate users).
> Is this possible?
Yes. You can mount an NFS volume pretty much anywhere you want -- BUT,
the original directory [empty or not] will be "hidden" for as long as
the mount is in place. That's probably not what you want.
If you need to "mingle" subdirectories from different NFS volumes within
a single [local] directory, one way is to have a setup something like
this:
/mnt/vol1 - NFS volume 1 [containing a/, b/, c/]
/mnt/vol2 - NFS volume 2 [containing d/, e/, f/]
/home/a - symbolic link to /mnt/vol1/a
/home/b - symbolic link to /mnt/vol1/b
/home/c - symbolic link to /mnt/vol1/c
/home/d - symbolic link to /mnt/vol2/d
/home/e - symbolic link to /mnt/vol2/e
/home/f - symbolic link to /mnt/vol2/f
That will provide the type of structure I think you're looking for.
HTH
--
Bill Clark
Systems Architect
ISP Channel
http://neighborhood.ispchannel.com/
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Wolfgang Viechtbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linksys 10/100 NIC questions
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:07:25 -0500
> 1. What could be generating these SIOCADDRT messages and what can I do to
> stop them
Take a look at /etc/sysconfig/network.
If yout GATEWAY= line says something like 0.0.0.0, get rid of the 0.0.0.0
and leave it blank. If it was blank, then change the GATEWAYDEV= line to
blank as well. In other words:
GATEWAY=
GATEWAYDEV=
Although, if you are using some kind of gateway (i.e. it doesn't say
0.0.0.0 or some other meaningless entry for GATEWAY), onbiously don't
delete it!
> 2. What is causing the Linksys cards to go into half duplex mode and can I
> stop it?
I have the same cards in a few of my machines and they, to no surprise,
also operate in half-duplex mode. I cannot tell you WHY they switch to hd
mode, but I have heard lengthy debates on what is better for networks:
half or full duplex. While it may seem like you definetely want full
duplex, I guess for networks this is not always the best solution. So you
might not have to worry about it as much.
=========================
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Terry Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Is samba needed for Linux to ping Win95 computer?
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:12:33 -0700
Provided you have your NICs configured properly and the IP stack is loaded,
you should be able to ping each machine without Samba.
Wlmet wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am trying to get my linux computer to ping my Win95 box and vice versa.
I
>know that this is not a hardware issue as the Win95 box is dual boot and it
>pings using Linux. Does one need to set up Samba to do this?
------------------------------
From: "Terry Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mapping network drive from Win95?
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 16:52:20 -0700
On Windows, the ID is not case sensitive; on Linux, it is. Make sure your
id and password are in the same case...
Mikko wrote in message <7mmq1o$1tc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>When trying to map a drive from Win95 to a Linux server, it prompts:
>The password is incorrect. Try Again.
>Even though the password is right. In Windows 95 you can't set the username
>when logging on to another server (or can you?) like in Windows NT so I
think
>that might be the problem. Any hints?
>Thanks,
>Mikko
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Morris Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Diald failure
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 05:19:34 GMT
Environment:
Linux RedHat 6.0 CD Distribution 2.2.5
Pentium 133 16Mb 1.0 Gb
NE-2000 NIC
Adtran Express ISDN modem on /dev/modem = dev/ttyS1
I want the Linux box to act as NAT gateway for other PCs on the ethernet
network.
I can bring up the PPP link with
if-up ppp0
However, if I run diald, the connection fails with "Failed to initialize
modem"; the output from /var/log/messages follows:
Jul 12 09:54:33 lion kernel: diald uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET)
Jul 12 09:54:34 lion kernel: SLIP: version 0.8.4-NET3.019-NEWTTY-MODULAR
(dynami
c channels, max=256) (6 bit encapsulation enabled).
Jul 12 09:54:34 lion kernel: SLIP linefill/keepalive option.
Jul 12 09:55:30 lion diald[3893]: Running connect (pid = 3901).
Jul 12 09:55:37 lion connect: Initializing Modem
Jul 12 09:55:43 lion connect: Failed to initialize modem
Jul 12 09:55:43 lion diald[3893]: Connect script failed.
and here is part of /etc/diald.conf:
device /dev/modem
speed 115200
lock
mode ppp
dynamic
local 10.0.0.1
remote 10.0.0.2
pppd-options name ppp0 :
up-delay 5
defaultroute
modem
crtscts
connect /etc/diald/connect
and finally, /etc/diald/connect:
MODEM_INIT="ATZ S147=60 S148=40 S149=2 S150=1 S151=1 S152=2"
PHONE_NUMBER="5309038"
USER_CHAT_SEQ=""
USER_NAME=""
PASSWD_CHAT_SEQ=""
PASSWORD=""
PROMPT=""
PROTOCOL_START=""
START_ACK=""
function message () {
[ $FIFO ] && echo "message $*" >$FIFO
logger -p local2.info -t connect "$*"
}
message "Initializing Modem"
chat TIMEOUT 5 "" $MODEM_INIT TIMEOUT 45 OK ""
if [ $? != 0 ]; then
message "Failed to initialize modem"
exit 1
fi
The modem string, device, speed, and phone number are the same as used by
if-up ppp0.
Any ideas?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Terry Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing Netgear FA310TX card
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:09:41 -0700
I have Redhat 5.2. My NIC is a Netgear, and I think it is the same model;
though I am not positive. Redhat autodetected it, and I was off to the
races.
WChan21438 wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am trying to install a Netgear FA310TX card on Red Hat Linux version 4.2.
>On the same machine I have Win-95 working fine with the card.
>I followed the instruction provide by Netgear.
>Compiled the tulip driver and cp it to /lib/modules/2.0.30/net/tulip.o.
>When I type depmod -a it gave a message:
>
>Unresolved symbols in module /lib/modules/2.0.30/net/tulip.o
>
>The machine is a 133MHz clone with 6G of harddisk, 64M of RAM.
>Does anyone have any ideas?
>
>Wayne
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lei Zheng)
Subject: [HELP] loopback doesn't work
Date: 17 Jul 1999 00:33:08 GMT
Hi,
I am new to Linux networking. I have just installed RH 6.0. My problem is
that my netscape cannot connect to localhost.localdomain nor 127.0.0.1
I can see from top command that my Apache is running. What else should
I do? I was assuming this should work by default. Also on any machine
I have installed RH5.2 on, with a network interface, I have the same problem.
I can access the Apache from outside with URL, but not with the loopback name
and IP -- localhost.localdomain and 127.0.0.1. Thanks in advance.
Lei
------------------------------
From: "Terry Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP wanted to configure networking...
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:03:23 -0700
I have similar problem. I can't access my ISP via PPP unless I manually set
the ppp0 to be my default route. Its a real pain. I have no difficulty
accessing any machines on my network, though.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7mn4v9$cld$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello world,
>
>I have a problem to configure SuSE Linux 5.3. I can't access the
>network if I don't write the command:
>"route add -net default gw 149.222.132.1 dev eth0"
>after starting KDE!!!
>
>Is the default IP really necessary???
>
>I have another problem to reach the FTP during the installation (with
>YaST), booting the machine with a boot disk.
>
>Thank you for your help...
>
>Cordialy,
>
>Romuald.
>
>
>
>
>NOTE:
>Here is the output of the command "ifconfig -a":
>------------------------------------------------
>eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:2E:72:6B
> inet addr:149.222.132.130 Bcast:149.222.129.201
> Mask:255.255.192.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:26618 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:2137 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300
>
>Here is the output of the command "netstat -rn":
>------------------------------------------------
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
>149.222.132.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 eth0
>149.222.132.130 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 1500 0 0 eth0
>149.222.129.200 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 1500 0 0 eth0
>149.222.129.201 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 1500 0 0 eth0
>0.0.0.0 149.222.132.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0 eth0
>
>NOTE:
>-The entry "0.0.0.0" don't appear since I don't write the command
>(after starting KDE):
>"route add -net default gw 149.222.132.1 dev eth0"
>-I entred all this values in /etc/route.conf, but Linux don't use the
>entry "0.0.0.0"
>-You see, that all the NetMask are "255.255.255.255". It is because the
>commant route don't accept the real netmask "255.255.192.0" with the
>actual IP "149.222.132.1". I don't know why... "route" accept it ONLY
>when the IP ended with xxx.xxx.xxx.0. In /etc/route.conf I can write
>what I want, Linux don't repair the errors. But when the Netmask is
>not "255.255.255.255", I never access the network.
>-I can access the local network without writing the extra route
>command. A ping with the Gateway or the DNS work in all case. But when
>DEFAULT don't appear in the list, I can't access the Internet.
>
>
>Here is a copy of "/etc/resolv.conf":
>-------------------------------------
>#
># /etc/resolv.conf
>#
># Automatically generated by SuSEconfig on Fri Jul 2 21:08:35 MEST
>1999.
>#
># PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE!
>#
># Change variables (NAMESERVER + SEARCHLIST) in /etc/rc.config instead.
>#
>#
>search maschinenwesen.fh-kiel.de nsc03.nsc.FH-Kiel.de smtp.FH-Kiel.de
>nameserver 149.222.129.201
>nameserver 149.222.129.200
>
>NOTE:
>-I write this informations under YaST. But I don't know when
>the "search list" is the right one. I copy this informations from the
>output of the command "route".
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: win95 / linux IP routing?
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:21:36 GMT
Ron Bombard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a RedHat 6.0 machine with a ppp connection to my ISP. My Linux
>box has a cache-only named server running, with my isp's DNS server
>listed in my /etc/resolv.conf file.
>
>Works fine for browsing and email and whatnot. On the same network I
>have my PC.
>I'm trying to connect my PC to the internet using my Linux box's
>connection.
>
>In the network settings on my PC, I have my linux box listed as the
>Gateway. I have my Linux box listed in the DNS server search table. I
>have my linux box listed as my WINS server.
>
>I can ping my linux box from the pc. I can ping my pc from my linux
>box.
>I can ping a hostname on the internet (ie: ping www.commercial.com )
>and it will do the address resolution but the ping times out.
Probably need to load ipchains and if you are going to ftp from the
win client you will need to load the ip_masq_ftp module.
ipchains is the replacement for the ipfwadm of the 5.x versions.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
Subject: Re: NFS problems in Redhat Linux 6
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16 Jul 1999 20:21:13 -0500
On 16 Jul 1999 19:27:57 -0500, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 15 Jul 1999 16:51:21 GMT, Andreas Metzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> knfsd has nothing to do with kernel. Messing with kernel will
>>> lets you mount/umont nfs drive.
>>
>>hmm, I am pretty shure you are wrong
>>redhat 6.0 uses the kernel level nfs-daemon (aka knfsd), which is
>>either a kernel module or compiled into the kernel.
>>Try less /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Configure.help and search for
>>NFS server support.
>>
>
>Maybe you are right but how come I don't come across anything to do
>with nfs server when I compile 2.2.10 or red hat's 2.2.5-22. But
>I will check Configure.help as you suggest.
CONFIG_NFSD does not show up until I say yes to
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
I am now compiling kernel and will post the results when
it is finished.
Thanks andrea
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
