Linux-Networking Digest #951, Volume #11         Tue, 20 Jul 99 13:13:30 EDT

Contents:
  Re: PING in NT DOMAIN and LINUX ("Martin C. Barlow")
  Re: LRH Linux hangs with a 100Base-T network board ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Samba problems with Linux <-> Win NT 4 (Alvaro Garriga)
  Re: eth0 & ppp0 problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: my version of the Linux FAQ ("TiTi")
  Re: PCI NIC card in same box as ISA NIC card ? (Rod Smith)
  Re: Problem with PPP connection (Roy Grimm)
  Re: Sharing NetZero on home network? (Tao Tong)
  Sharing NetZero on home network? (Vikas Agnihotri)
  Telnet problems. (Venantius)
  Ethernet card for HP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: RFC 959 linux ftpd, Contivity Extranet Switch (Richard Demanowski)
  Re: Why are there so many slow modem issues? Solution !!! (for me anyways) (Jason 
Koloseike)
  Re: Linux as a server (Monte Phillips)
  Re: Sharing NetZero on home network? (Monte Phillips)
  Linux to Linux PPP links (Adrian Brown)
  digiport portserver (Kostis Mentzelos)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Martin C. Barlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PING in NT DOMAIN and LINUX
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 23:54:45 +1000

I also can not ping from or to linux boxes using host names. From what i gather,
i think that windows machines can use netbios to resolute names of machines.
Linux does not do this natively. I am trying to find out how to dynamically find
out the host name of a machine using some sort of broadcast. My comps are
allocated ips using dhcp so hosts file and dns are not appropriate as they are
both static.

I really want to know how to do it.

thanks

Martin

Bwilkinson1 wrote:

> Here is the information you requested...
>
> Netstat -rn
>
> Destination; Gateway; genmask;flags;mss;window;irtt;if
> 192.168.1.5 ;0.0.0.0 ;255.255.255.255;UH;0;0;0;eth0
> 192.168.1.0; 0.0.0.0 ;255.255.255.192;U ;0;0;0; eth0
> 127.0.0.0; 0.0.0.0; 255.0.0.0 ;U; 0;0;0; lo
> 0.0.0.0 ; 192.168.1.1; 0.0.0.0; UG; 0;0;0; eth0
>
> arp -a
> spjamir0.spjdom (192.168.1.1) at (incomplete) on eth0
>
> ifconfig -a
>
> eth0
> link encap:ethernet hwaddr:(gives hardware address)
> up broadcast running promisc multicast mtu:1500 metric:1
> rx packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overuns:0 frame:0
> txpackets:152 errors:0 dropped:0 overuns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 TXqueuelen:100
> interupt:11 base address:0x300
>
> lo
> link encap:local loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 mask:255.0.0.0
> up loobback running mtu:3924 metric:1
> rxpackets:134 errors:0 Dropped:0 overuns:0 frames:0
> txpackets:134 errors:0 Dropped:0 overuns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>
> I should have posted more info to begin with but I was hopping that I made a
> simple configuration error.. Thanks to anyone who can help me.
>
> Andrey Smirnov wrote in message
> <7motq2$ent$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Can you include output of ifconfig -a, netstat -rn commands,also arp -a
> from
> >all machines.
> >
> >Good luck!
> >
> >Bwilkinson1 wrote in message ...
> >>I have three machine's on my home network. One NT Primary Domain
> Controller
> >>, One NT Workstation , and one Linux box running Mandrake 6.0. They are
> all
> >>plugged into a 10mb hub (not switched). All my machine sit behind a proxy
> >>"Wingate 3.0" and are routed to the internet thru my DSL router. Of course
> >>my PDC is the default Gateway. I want to set up my LINUX box to be the
> >>Gateway but there is one problem.. I cant ping my NT boxes from Linux, and
> >I
> >>cant ping the Linux box from NT. The weird thing is that the Linux box
> >>running Samba is able to announce itself on the NT browse list's but I am
> >>unable to access it. If anybody has ran into this and could help me I
> would
> >>really appreciate it. I have spent many hours and have read countless man
> >>pages and various documents. I have re-installed twice. I have configured
> >>DNS instead of WINS. I would assume maybe a hardware problem, but the fact
> >>it announces itself in network neighborhood. I have to assume that I have
> >>configured the Networking portion of linux wrong. Here is what I have.
> >>
> >>NT PDC (3c509)
> >>IP 192.168.1.1
> >>Submask 255.255.255.192 (when I configured DNS it changed the 0 to 192...)
> >>
> >>NT WS (3c905)
> >>IP 192.168.1.2
> >>Submask 255.255.255.192
> >>Default GW 192.168.1.1
> >>
> >>Linux Box (3c509)
> >>IP 192.168.1.5
> >>Submask 255.255.255.192
> >>Primary NS 192.168.1.1
> >>Secondary 192.168.1.5
> >>
> >>I entered all the hosts info in /etc/hosts... When I send out a ping I can
> >>see activity between the hosts on the HUB lights.. They just dont recieve
> >>responses. PLEASE HELP!!!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LRH Linux hangs with a 100Base-T network board
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:24:25 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Allen Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
>     At what point during the boot up process does it hang?
>
> Allen
> --
> Linux:  If you're not careful, you might actually learn something.
>

Thanks for responding.

It boots successfully.  It hangs after a period of time while it works
properly, usually between 5-10 minutes, but occasionally up to an hour.  The
only change I make to make it work is to switch the network board with an SMC
Ultra, and everything works fine with the SMC Ultra.

I am using linuxconf to change the configuration between the two network
boards, and yes, I do remove the unused board while testing the other one.


Jonathan


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: Alvaro Garriga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba problems with Linux <-> Win NT 4
Date: 20 Jul 1999 07:39:01 PDT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi

I am new to Linux and I want to setup Linux a file/print server
I got everything working fine but Samba
I follow the instructions from
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
and I can do smbclient -L linuxserver and see all the share partitions and my
WinNt box. I can see the linux server from WinNT and I can ping by IP address
but not name the same happens in my linux box.

If I try to login to my linux box It ask me for the password but I can not get
in ( Yes I did the enabletextonlypassword thing for NT and rebooted the machine
)
I can not even see the public partitions.

What am I missing ?

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eth0 & ppp0 problem
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:36:31 GMT

I currently have a Linux box at home set up as a network server with
another Linux box and a Win95 PC connected to it.  Everything is running
great, telnet, ftp, ping, samba, yadda-yadda.  My problem is while I'm
on the server, ppp0 will not (run/connect to net) while my eth0 is
running.  So basically I have to shut the network down with
/etc/rc.d/inet.d/network stop command.  Then I can get ppp0 to connect
to the net/ISP.  After I'm done surfing restart the network and all is
well.  Something is conflicting but I don't know what, anyone got any
ideas?

Steve Sims


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: "TiTi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: my version of the Linux FAQ
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 16:41:40 +0200
Reply-To: "TiTi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Ahahahaha, it's perfect, you really thought about all the most common
questions ;)
Maybe you should add how to reboot using "reboot" commands, not reset :)

        - TiTi



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: PCI NIC card in same box as ISA NIC card ?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:53:24 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Posted and mailed]

In article <MPG.11fe6872c0997c38989690@normalnews>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Internal Systems Support) writes:
> It should not be long before cable modems arrive in my neck of the woods. 
> These cable modems connect to an NIC installed in a PC. I currently have 
> two PCs which both contain old 3Com 3C503 ISA NIC cards to network them 
> together. One box, running Linux is used as an Internet proxy server. 
> 
> If I get a cable modem and connect it to my Linux box, would it be OK to 
> use a 3Com 3C905 PCI NIC alongside the 3C503 ISA card I've already got 
> installed ? I can't fit another ISA card in my box, it has to be PCI. 

Sure.  There should be no problem.  One suggestion, though:  Connect the
cable modem to the 10Mbps (I'm assuming) 3c503 and your internal network
to the 10/100Mbps 3c905.  You can then upgrade your other computer to a
10/100 NIC and have much faster internal network communications.  A cable
modem isn't fast enough to exceed 10Mbps, so there's no point in "wasting"
the faster NIC on it.

-- 
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
Author of _Special Edition Using WordPerfect for Linux_, from Que

------------------------------

From: Roy Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Problem with PPP connection
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 09:08:33 -0500

Chengxiang Zhai wrote:
> 
> I have SupraExpress 288i Plug and Play (PnP) Fax Modem installed in
> my pentium 133. It works fine with Window 95. However, it does not
> seem to work with my linux (RedHat 4.1, kernel 2.0.27). It does not
> return OK to the AT commands. However, it can dial out sometimes
> if I type ATDT phone# with dip -tv running interactively. I try to
> use "+++" to bring it back to command mode in case it is in on-line
> mode, it does not seem to make it better.
> 
> Any advice/comments will be greatly appreciated!
> 
> --Cheng

I have a SupraExpress 56i v.90.  It came with a bunch of jumpers on it
which allowed me to take the modem out of PNP mode and "hard wire" it to
use a particular COM port.  If you still have the documentation for the
modem, it may tell you how you can change the modem settings.  If you
don't have the documentation, go to Diamond's web site (
http://www.diamondmm.com ) and search for modem documentation.  It
should be there somewhere.  I know I was able to find some documentation
for my modem before but I can't remember the specific URLs.  I do
remember that they had support for a wide variety of modems, not just
the 56k ones.

Good luck,
Roy

------------------------------

From: Tao Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sharing NetZero on home network?
Crossposted-To: 
alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 15:44:28 GMT

In comp.os.linux.networking Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming I install Ethernet cards, hub, etc for a home network, how do I
> share my NetZero Internet access among all the PCs?

I think you should read the IP masquerading howto, you will have some clue
after reading this document. 

Good luck.  
-- 

------------------------------

From: Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Sharing NetZero on home network?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 15:04:30 GMT

Assuming I install Ethernet cards, hub, etc for a home network, how do I
share my NetZero Internet access among all the PCs?

>From what I know about all the Internet-share products out there, they
require a specialized dial-up ISP account with a static IP address, etc.
With NetZero, I dont have control over any aspect of DUN. I just click
on the NetZero icon and it does the rest. I get a dynamic IP address
each time.

As usual, if I bind my Ethernet cards to the private 192.168.x.x
network, how will they access the dynamic IP address bound to the TCP/IP
stack? I'm confused...

Any experiences appreciated.

Thanks,
Vikas


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: Venantius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Telnet problems.
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 23:54:14 +0800

Hi everyone.

I have got a a small network setup with one Linux machine serving 3
win95 machines.  Now one of my machine cannot telnet to the server.  I
find it to be strange since all the other machines can.  What is even
more strange is that there are certain IP addresses that it accepts and
certain addresses that hangs after the following message:

Red Hat Linux release 6.0 (Hedwig)
Kernel 2.2.5-15 on an i586

There is no login prompt.  The IP address of the calling machine has
been placed in the /etc/hosts file.  Can anyone help me on this one?

Thanks alot.


regards,
Venantius.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet card for HP
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 15:13:04 GMT

I have an HP Pavilion 4455 running Red Hat 6.0.  I will be using a
SURFboard SB2100 cable modem to Sunflower.com which uses DHCP to assign
IP addresses. Can anyone recommend an Ethernet card that will work with
this combination?

Thanks,

Paul Fairchild


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: Richard Demanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RFC 959 linux ftpd, Contivity Extranet Switch
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 15:29:05 GMT

Alan Curry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Richard Demanowski  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>The difference is that the Linux ftpd responds to the ls request with a
>>550 File not found, and the Sun ftpd responds with the sequence 150, 226.
> What version of ftpd are you running, and what version of the ftp client are
> you testing with? (different ftp clients may send different commands to do an
> ls)

How do I determine this?  It's the in.ftpd that comes with Debian 2.2.

I'm using the WinNT ftp client to test this.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (finger for PGP public key)
                                        http://www.wasatch.com/~rdemanow/
=========================================================================
  "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend, to the
               death, your right to say it." -- Voltaire

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Koloseike)
Subject: Re: Why are there so many slow modem issues? Solution !!! (for me anyways)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 16:05:20 GMT

Last night I finally solved my "slow modem" problem:

        add a "baud rate" to /etc/ppp/option or as
        an additional parameter that kppp passes
        to pppd.

For those who aren't familiar with my tilt on the
problem, I'll recap.  

I had been using Mandrake 5.3 successfully and upgraded
to Mandrake 6.0 soon after it was available. As with
any release there were a few bugs.  By getting the
update RPMS and downgrading pppd to version 2.3.5
I was able to do everything I had done with Mandrake 5.3.

Unfortunately, a subtle "slow connection" issue crept into 
the picture.  Instead of the familiar 3-4 kbyte/sec 
transfer rate, my 33.6K modem was only chugging along at 
a slow 1 kbyte/sec.

After following several fruitless suggestion about IRQ's,
MRU's, etc, I was about ready to give up.

Last night I went back to me pre-kppp ppp scripts that I
had used with Redhat 5.1, and to my surprise, they worked!

After some tracking, I was able to narrow it down to one
parameter: "baud rate".

pppd expects a "baud rate" parameter.  Since kppp wasn't
passing it by default, ppp fixed itself to a slow 
transfer rate, even though the serial port had
been set to a higher speed (38400, 11520, etc.)

Hope this helps with your issues.   

PS. Even thou I downgraded to pppd 2.3.5-2, this is still
an issue with pppd 2.3.7.  But I would term this as a
kppp bug.  I downgraded to 2.3.5 so that I could connect
to a CHAP authenticated site.  2.3.7 was only allowing
me to connect to a scripted ISP site.





Jason Koloseike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Linux as a server
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 15:39:32 GMT

Just a neophytes thoughts, BUT<G>   
I know you can mount a share with a line in the users .basrc, so the
 initial problem is easy, the mounting of a share when a user logs in
(or a machine). 
What I lack the skills to do is write a script that will then ping
that machine (and each other machine that is logged on and has mounted
a share) on regular intervals and if it fails to return, then run a
script to unmount that share.

Not sure if this is possible but I really do not see where it wouldn't
be.


 John Schmerold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>One of the things you are looking for is a NWADMN32.EXE program for LINUX.  As
>best I can tell this does not exist yet.  But, it seems like LDAP will be
>solution.  It appears we can use this technology to store user names, passwords,
>rights to directories, volumes etc, email information, roaming profiles etc
>I wish I had the brains & time to implement this concept.

>Gerry Kerr wrote:
>> I have been watching Linux grow in features, depth, ease of installation for
>> the last couple of years. I use linux at home (more to be familiar with the
>> os than in anger).   We are now looking  at Linux as a "File" server OS for
>> small business. I alway thought that there were a number of key areas that
>> needed to be address before Linux became a viable option.
>> The key areas as I see them are:

>> 1. Ability to map network drives/printers onto the client PCs
>> 2. Mail / Fax and web access solution
>> 3. Automated Backup solutions
>> 4. A network client for the workstations.

>> Typically our small businesses customers do not care what is running on the
>> server as long as it works. Most of them never thoch the damn thing - they
>> rely on us to be their system administrators.

>> Of the 4 key areas above the only piece missing is no 4 (at least I am not
>> aware of one).

>> Ideally the client should be capable of running scripts to automate drive
>> mapping, home directories, printer access etc.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Crossposted-To: 
alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Sharing NetZero on home network?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 15:45:07 GMT

I would guess that what is needed is something like Sysgate or Wingate
to handle those ips for the clients.  I am assuming that the NetZero
is on the WinBox,  and the Winbox will be your internet connection for
the network? 
Hey if this is out in left field just ignore!  :)

Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Assuming I install Ethernet cards, hub, etc for a home network, how do I
>share my NetZero Internet access among all the PCs?
>From what I know about all the Internet-share products out there, they
>require a specialized dial-up ISP account with a static IP address, etc.
>With NetZero, I dont have control over any aspect of DUN. I just click
>on the NetZero icon and it does the rest. I get a dynamic IP address
>each time.

>As usual, if I bind my Ethernet cards to the private 192.168.x.x
>network, how will they access the dynamic IP address bound to the TCP/IP
>stack? I'm confused...


------------------------------

From: Adrian Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux to Linux PPP links
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:22:37 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi All,

Has anyone connected two Linux boxes together with PPP on RedHat 6.0?

Although I have managed to configure the server to accept dialin access
from a Windows 95 box and also configured another Linux machine to dial
on demand to our ISP, I am having trouble getting the two Linux boxes to
talk to each other.

I have set up a separate configuration file on the server to use a
different set of options when the Linux box connects.

I am also running mgetty, the login.config file contains these two
lines:

/AutoPPP/ -     -       /usr/sbin/pppd
ppp -   -       /usr/sbin/pppd file /etc/ppp/options.linuxclient

The first line is for the Win95 clients which works OK. The second line,
'ppp' is the one I am using when logging in from the Linux client as
user 'ppp'.

The 'options.linuxclient'  file on the server looks like:

-detach
debug
asyncmap 0
netmask 255.255.255.0
noauth
modem
crtscts
lock
require-pap
refuse-chap
login
:192.168.1.99

Here is the chat script that is executed on the Linux client:

'ABORT' 'BUSY'
'ABORT' 'ERROR'
'ABORT' 'NO'
''AT OK-AT-OK ATZ OK-AT-OK
'ATS0=0 Q0 V1 &C1&D2&K0&M4&R2&H1&I0' OK-AT-OK
ATDT878260 CONNECT
"" ogin: ppp word: ppp

...and this is the contents of /var/log/messages on the Linux client
after the Linux client box attempted a login to the Linux server:

Jul 20 15:23:50 ms_piggy chat[1308]: rocko.greendown.co.uk login:
Jul 20 15:23:50 ms_piggy chat[1308]:  -- got it
Jul 20 15:23:50 ms_piggy chat[1308]: send (ppp^M)
Jul 20 15:23:50 ms_piggy chat[1308]: expect (word:)
Jul 20 15:23:50 ms_piggy chat[1308]:  ppp^M
Jul 20 15:23:53 ms_piggy chat[1308]: ~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } } }
Jul 20 15:23:59 ms_piggy chat[1308]:
#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~
Jul 20 15:24:02 ms_piggy chat[1308]: ^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } } }#
Jul 20 15:24:08 ms_piggy chat[1308]:
}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?
Jul 20 15:24:12 ms_piggy chat[1308]: }#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } } }#}
Jul 20 15:24:18 ms_piggy chat[1308]:
$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}#@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~~^?}
Jul 20 15:24:21 ms_piggy chat[1308]: #@!}!}!} }8}"}&} } } }
}#}$@#}%}&G8}:}/}'}"}(}"CK~^M
Jul 20 15:24:21 ms_piggy pppd[1305]: Connect script failed
Jul 20 15:24:21 ms_piggy chat[1308]: NO
Jul 20 15:24:21 ms_piggy chat[1308]:  -- failed
Jul 20 15:24:21 ms_piggy chat[1308]: Failed (NO)

As you can see, the initial login starts off OK then the server starts
sending PPP packets after the client sends the password. It appears the
client is still hung up in the chat script.

I would be grateful to receive any ideas on what might be wrong.

TIA

Adrian Brown

------------------------------

From: Kostis Mentzelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: digiport portserver
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:22:07 +0300

I need something like Digiboard Portserver.

Is there anything else except digiboard?
Kostis



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to