Linux-Networking Digest #998, Volume #11 Sun, 25 Jul 99 03:14:11 EDT
Contents:
ADULTS ONLY 79171 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: modem : USR 28.8 Fax Modem, script fails (Clifford Kite)
Re: netscape (Randal Powell)
Re: modem : USR 28.8 Fax Modem, script fails ("mikes")
Respawning too fast (D.T.)
Re: PLIP with strange cable (Preston F. Crow)
Re: stopping telnet (David Crooke)
Re: PPP Problems RH 6.0 (jeff)
Smbclient (D.T.)
Ping ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: assemble and send raw ethernet packets (Megan)
Re: assemble and send raw ethernet packets (Megan)
win 95 connection problem to Samba ("Roger Pang")
Re: My Dissapointment to find Linux not a viable solution (J.Mansell)
stopping telnet ("System Administrator")
mod_perl wont compile for SWS 2.0 & RH 6.0, (Dwayne Croteau)
Re: Linux server ("VirGin")
NIS client and X windows?...how? ("Verbelen")
Cable modem and LinkSys EtherPCI LAN Card II not going to gether with RedHat Linux.
("sk")
PPP Error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux friendly ISPs (Alex Harrington)
Re: Automate DNS entries in Red Hat (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: Ping (Glenn Valenta)
Re: CIPE on Alpha ("B. James Phillippe")
IP address (Brian Savacool)
Re: Synchronizing time between server. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: weird ping (ryan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: ADULTS ONLY 79171
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, 24 Jul 1999 18:31:55 -0600
ADULTS ONLY!
http://207.240.225.250/
3*\`>ajx
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: modem : USR 28.8 Fax Modem, script fails
Date: 24 Jul 1999 22:14:14 -0500
mikes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: >The alarm is a timeout looking for the CONNECT string, so the modem didn't
: >send a CONNECT to the serial line or the CONNECT didn't get to the serial
: >line in time. Posting the chat execution script and chat expect/send
: Is CONNECT something my ISP sends, or is that a message the modem returns to
: the script once it figures it has negotiated a connection?
The modem sends it once the negotiation is complete.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: Randal Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: netscape
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 20:18:16 -0700
Michel Catudal wrote:
> Which version would that be?
>
> doing rpm -q java I get java-1.1.7v1a-9
> I use SuSE 6.1 with kernel 2.2.10
>
> --
> use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
> use Linux for safe and quick internet access
> use Winblows to test the latest viruses
> http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
> We have software, food, music, news, search,
> history, electronics and genealogy pages.
I used jre1.2pre-v2. DL the soruce code (a 12 mg monster) and compile
it. Pretty easy as it's preconfigured. Just assign it and you're pretty
much done.
--
Randy Powell
"Reality is that part of imagination that most people agree on"
Descartes
------------------------------
From: "mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem : USR 28.8 Fax Modem, script fails
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:04:14 -0500
Reply-To: "mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>The alarm is a timeout looking for the CONNECT string, so the modem didn't
>send a CONNECT to the serial line or the CONNECT didn't get to the serial
>line in time. Posting the chat execution script and chat expect/send
Is CONNECT something my ISP sends, or is that a message the modem returns to
the script once it figures it has negotiated a connection?
>script plus an exact copy of all the chat syslogd log messages complete
>with timestamps might be useful.
I will dig back through the logs, and try to get you a typical failure...
-Mike
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D.T.)
Subject: Respawning too fast
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 03:53:08 GMT
Recently I have been getting the following error message
INIT: Id "x" Respawning to fast: Disabled for 5 minutes
where x = 2 3 or 4
it appears to occur when I have several terminals open
ie ALT F2 ALT F3 etc
I am unable to get access to any terminal and am unable to shutdown.
The only solution appears to be to power off, with the resulting error
messages on the ext2 file system when rebooted.
I am running Redhat 5.2 on a 486 DX4 100 with 420 meg harddisk
the only thing I can think of is lack of disk space as the Harddisk
only has 10000 blocks remaining.
Anyone have any ideas? am I looking in the right place
TIA
Dennis Troake
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Preston F. Crow)
Subject: Re: PLIP with strange cable
Date: 25 Jul 1999 03:48:31 GMT
Sounds like it's really a serial cable for connecting a device that
uses the old 25-pin RS-232 ports to the newer 9-pin RS-232 ports. I
think some devices had the gender reversed from what you would see on
a PC (external modems or dumb terminals), though I'm not certain on
that.
Anyway, there's no good way that I know of to send signals directly
between a parallel port and a serial port. I think they even use
different electrical signal levels, so you would at least need some
sort of simple chip in there (which could, in theory, be embedded in
the jack)--I think that it is very unlikely you have such a cable.
--PC
--
We're sorry, the .sig you have selected has been deleted or is no longer in
service. If you think you have read this .sig in error, please disconnect
and try your news reader again. Thank-you.
------------------------------
From: David Crooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stopping telnet
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 03:16:08 GMT
Edit /etc/inetd.conf and prepend a # to the line for telnet (tcp port
23), thus commenting it out. Then restart inetd using "killproc -HUP
inetd"
You may also want to stop rlogin, klogin, etc. - for good security, have
a look down the file and turn off any/all services you don't need.
Dave
--
David Crooke, Austin TX, USA. +1 (512) 656 6102
"Open source software - with no walls and fences, who needs Windows
and Gates?"
------------------------------
From: jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Problems RH 6.0
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 23:50:17 -0400
It looks like you're connecting at 14400 and your ISP is telling you
14400 is not supported...could that be the problem why your IPCP
negotiations are failing?
> Jul 5 13:41:26 Mylinux ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/ttyS1 at 14400
> Jul 5 13:41:26 Mylinux pppd[500]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
> Jul 5 13:41:26 Mylinux pppd[500]: speed 14400 not supported
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D.T.)
Subject: Smbclient
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 03:53:09 GMT
I am reletively new to Linux and am attempting to use Samba to connect
my Linux PC to our other 2 Win95 PCs.
I have installed to Network card OK & can Ping the Win95 PCs which are
setup with TCP/IP 192.168.0.1 & 2 with Linux PC 192.168.0.3
I have modified smb.conf after reading the SMB.HOWTO but can not get
the Linux PC to recognise either WIN95 PC
When I run smbclient I get the following error message
Added interface ip=192.168.0.3 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
startlmhosts : Can't open lmhost file /etc/lmhosts . Error was NO such
file or directory.
I have done a find for lmhosts on the whole Harddisk without any
success. What or who should have created lmhosts file. Can I create it
? if so what does it contain.
Thanks for any help or advice
Dennis Troake
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ping
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 04:23:33 GMT
Hi,
I have one linux machine and one nt machine via network (hub).
My hosts.allow file say ALL: ALL
I can ping the NT from linux, but I can't ping the Linux.
Can someone help?
Thanks in advance
Paul
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Megan)
Subject: Re: assemble and send raw ethernet packets
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 05:10:06 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul D. Boyle) writes:
>If you are running a 2.2.x kernel the following man pages may be useful:
>packet(4), raw(4), socket(4).
I've been checking these pages... raw doesn't do much good, since it
either prepends an IP header, or requires the user to pass one...
I've done some of what is indicated in packet(4) and socket(4), and
can get the probgram to at least receive the packets of the Ethernet
protocol I need, but *only* when tcpdump is also running on the
machine !?
I'm hoping I don't have to put the interface in promiscuous mode, I'm
trying to avoid that... but I need to be able to get packets (with a
certain Ethernet protocol type, 0x6006, sent either to the station
physical address, or a multicast address).
Can anyone help by pointing me to sample code or documentation which
shows clear examples?
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Megan)
Subject: Re: assemble and send raw ethernet packets
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 05:05:54 GMT
"Holger van Koll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Any drivers, example code, or doc's that would help?
>>
>you should find that in /usr/src/linux/net/ethernet
I'm looking for the same thing... and didn't find anything of use
in this directory... what were you pointing us at?
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: "Roger Pang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: win 95 connection problem to Samba
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 09:36:16 +0800
Hello
Our company has approx. 100 PCs running Win 95 / 98; 4 Novell 3.12 servers;
1 Intel Internet Station which also act as DHCP and DNS server. I set up a
Linux server running Samba with fixed IP address.
My problem is only some (but not all) PCs can see the Linux box in 'Network
Neighbourhood'.
I've checked / done the followings :
- All PCs are using DHCP to obtain IP address from the Intel Internet
Station
- All PCs have installed TCP/IP, IPX, and Netbeui with same workgroup
- All PCs can see each other on the 'Network Neighbourhood'
- In the Linux box, I ping the Win95 PC which can't find the Linux box -
successful
- In the Win95 PC which can't find the Linux box, I ping the Linux box -
successful
- All PCs and servers are on the same sub-net mask.
- I don't understand but I found the 'Network Neighbourhood still showing
the name of some PCs which I switched off for an hour already.
I guess the problem may come from different PCs using different Master
Browser List because :
- for PCs which successfully connected to Linux, it takes more than 5
seconds to wait in order to obtain to the browse list
- for PCs which failed connected to Linux, it takes only 2 seconds to obtain
the browse list
- the 'successful and the 'failed' PC are connected to the same hub
Anyone can help ?
------------------------------
From: J.Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: My Dissapointment to find Linux not a viable solution
Date: 25 Jul 1999 04:31:15 GMT
Tam McLaughlin wrote:
>
>
> users in our company receive many .doc files and .exe
> files most of which are just silly fun programs but I know that if the
users are not careful and not educated about what they download, we may end
up with a serious virus sooner or later
I am not sure of what type of business your LAN supports but have to ask if
it is necessary for all of your users to have access to the internet to
perform their job function. (I am making the assumption that all do have
access). In addition to all of the other excellent ideas that have been
thrown about in this discussion I believe that limiting who has access to
"outside" (this includes mail, http, ftp etc.) will limit your risk of
infection. This can easily be managed with Linux using a hosts.deny file.
Another point (perhaps a pet peeve) is ...
I belive a user policy must be in place in an organization to outline
proper use of electronic assets for business purposes only. (this means no
silly fun programs <i know... killjoy>) but it will help eliminate another
potential source of viruses (and maybe help productivity)
A limit on e-mail size could also limit the spread of these files as most
docs could be placed on a common share for those who need access to them.
This takes some educating of users but reduces the amount of duplicate
files (or different versions) floating on the network plus reduces mailbox
sizes (i have found most users use email as a filing system)
Well, I hope there are some things in here you think are worth
considering..
Thanks for reading..
Jon
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "System Administrator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: stopping telnet
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 15:10:55 +1200
how do i stop people from telneting into my system..... which file do i
need to configure to allow/deny the people to login to my linux box
(redhat6.0)
------------------------------
From: Dwayne Croteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.development
Subject: mod_perl wont compile for SWS 2.0 & RH 6.0,
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 04:45:44 GMT
Hi,
I have Redhat 6.0 installed with Apache 1.3.6-7. I want to install RH
Secure Web Server 2.0. The installation script fails due to the fact
that I have newer libraries. I install manually with rpm, no problem.
I run httpsd, and it fails. According to RH's support page, there is a
problem with the perl path and it instucts one to:
1. install secureweb-devel-2.0.rpm from the secureweb CD.
2. rebuild mod_perl-1.19-2.src.rpm from the RH 6.0 SRPMS CD with "rpm
--rebuild /mnt/cdrom/SRPMS/mod_perl...."
3. then install the resulting package file in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386
via "rpm -ivh filename.rpm"
Step one completes fine. Step two does not. I get the following error:
/usr/include/apache/buff.h:73: ssl.h: No such file or directory
Then make exits with error 1 and 2.
I installed everything from the RH 6.0 CD and I am wondering which
package I need to install in order to compile mod_perl and install SWS
2.0 sucessfully. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Dwayne Croteau
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "VirGin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux server
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 21:54:20 -0700
www.linux.com
www.linuxworld.com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7muj9a$kik$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi, all! I'm new to Linux OS. Could anyone give me a hand providing
> some guidance and relevant references?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Verbelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NIS client and X windows?...how?
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 07:41:53 +0200
hi everybody,
problem: I configured my RH6.0 with gnome as a NIS client. Logging on in
terminal mode works fine. But i can't log on in graphical mode. If I log in
with a useraccount that's is in the local /etc/passwd file..X windows works
fine. But logging on through NIS doesn't work in graphical mode. X server
always tries to start and then shuts down again if i use 'startx'. Booting
in initlevel 5 doesn't work either. Then i log in, no error is given and X
tries to start up but then shuts down again and i'm back at the graphical
login screen. Why? What do I need to configure so that a NIS client can log
on and stay in graphic mode????
Thanks
(please send solution also to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: "sk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cable modem and LinkSys EtherPCI LAN Card II not going to gether with RedHat
Linux.
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 05:46:59 GMT
I got my @Home Cable modem connection today. The @Home data technician made
it working from my Win95 PC (Intel P II 266, 64). Unfortunately
he didn't install a LAN Card instead he used the one already existed on the
system. It is a LinkSys Ether PCI Lan Card II (10BT). It is working well
with Win95. But I do have a 2nd partition on the same PC which has RedHat
5.2 Linux installed.
Now after reading all the posted messages and Cablemodem support pages, I
still do not get this thing working.
1) Linux doesn't recognize my PCI Lan Card.
I have isapnp already running in my PC, but earlier version 1.1 or 1.2. I
could n't find an new rpm version. The one I down loaded was not recognized
by rpm. So if some one do have a new rpm version please let me know.
2) Do I need to update the above isapnp version, Does the isapnp work for
PCI Cards? Is there a PCIpnp version there?
3) From the RH Linux Installation Guide (p-295) the network driver for my
card is tulip.o, is there a chance I need a newer version of this or some
other
driver.
4) Finally I am new to Linux, so please give me a detailed answer if
possible.
Thank you
Suresh
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP Error
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 05:42:25 GMT
Hi,
I am trying to connect to my ISP from my Red Hat linux 6.0.
I used the netcfg tool to setup the ppp. Looking at the syslog messages
it appears that the connection is made but fails after .6 mins saying
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: LCP: timeout sending
Config-Requests
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Connection
terminated.
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Connect time 0.6 minutes.
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
clean:
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Any idea is to how I can correct this?
The entire log message for the ppp connection is
Jul 24 21:43:37 localhost pppd[621]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: abort on (BUSY)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: abort on (ERROR)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: abort on (Invalid Login)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: abort on (Login incorrect)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: send (ATZ^M)
Jul 24 21:43:38 localhost chat[626]: expect (OK)
Jul 24 21:44:07 localhost chat[626]: ATZ^M^M
Jul 24 21:44:07 localhost chat[626]: OK
Jul 24 21:44:07 localhost chat[626]: -- got it
Jul 24 21:44:07
localhost chat[626]: send (ATDT9540202^M)
Jul 24 21:44:07 localhost chat[626]: expect (CONNECT)
Jul 24 21:44:07 localhost chat[626]: ^M
Jul 24 21:44:37 localhost chat[626]: ATDT9540202^M^M
Jul 24 21:44:37 localhost chat[626]: CONNECT
Jul 24 21:44:37 localhost chat[626]: -- got it
Jul 24 21:44:37 localhost chat[626]: send (^M)
Jul 24 21:44:37 localhost chat[626]: timeout set to 5 seconds
Jul 24 21:44:37 localhost chat[626]: expect (~)
Jul 24 21:44:42 localhost chat[626]: alarm
Jul 24 21:44:42 localhost chat[626]: send (^M)
Jul 24 21:44:42 localhost chat[626]: send (^M)
Jul 24 21:44:42 localhost pppd[621]: Serial connection established.
Jul
24 21:44:47 localhost pppd[621]: Using interface ppp0
Jul 24 21:44:47 localhost pppd[621]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Jul
24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Connection terminated.
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Connect time 0.6 minutes.
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
clean:
Jul 24 21:45:18 localhost pppd[621]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Alex Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux friendly ISPs
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:47:51 +0100
You can connect to most ISP's with only a little tweaking - probably
with the execption of AOL???
BTInternet are probably the most Linux-Unfriendly ISP on the planet but
there are several Linux users who managed to get their boxes to connect
to it - me included. Perciverance is the watch word!
Alex -
Dhiraj Kacker wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was looking for comments on Linux friendly ISPs, i.e.
> ISPs that offer support and help with Linux setup OR
> "standard" ppp scripts without much tweaking can be used
> to connect. In particular, I'd like to know how good the
> following ISPs are :
>
> 1. Earthlink
> 2. Att World Net
> 3. Compuserve
>
> (these are the ones that have local access numbers in my area).
>
> I presently use Prodigy, but their connection speeds are very slow.
> Comments about other ISPs are also welcome.
>
> (BTW, I was shocked to learn that MSN does not have a 800 number
> tech support. On second thoughts, I should have expected a
> 900 number !!!).
>
> Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> -dhiraj
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: Automate DNS entries in Red Hat
Date: 22 Jul 1999 21:03:25 -0700
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:00:40 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am finding I am spending an insane amount of
>time doing something that I'm sure someone has
>had the sense to automate ... creating the proper
>entries for DNS.
IIRC the DNS&BIND book (O'Reilly) has references to tools that do
all this. It's been a while since I read that book, and I never
did do any DNS admin-ing anyway, so I'm not 100% sure.
If you dont have the book you might try the O'Reilly web page -
they usually have all the code from their books accessible
somewhere.
HTH
------------------------------
From: Glenn Valenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ping
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 06:27:05 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have one linux machine and one nt machine via network (hub).
> My hosts.allow file say ALL: ALL
> I can ping the NT from linux, but I can't ping the Linux.
> Can someone help?
> Thanks in advance
> Paul
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
If you can ping by using an IP address, then it's a nameserver problem.
What is NT using for a nameserver?
BTW, does anybody know if NT has an equivalent to the unix /etc/hosts ?
--
Glenn Valenta Engineering @ http://www.coloradostudios.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ouray.cudenver.edu/~gavalent/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Work mail
------------------------------
From: "B. James Phillippe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.alpha
Subject: Re: CIPE on Alpha
Date: 25 Jul 1999 06:07:11 GMT
On 23 Jul 1999, Kenneth Graves wrote:
> Has anyone succeeded in getting CIPE to work on an Alpha?
No, haven't tried.
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -I. -I../. -I/usr/src/linux/include -include\
> ./config.h -funroll-loops -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fomit-frame-pointer\
...
> /usr/src/linux/include/asm/current.h:4: global register variable follows a\
> function definition
> /usr/src/linux/include/asm/current.h:4: warning: call-clobbered register used\
> for global register variable
...
> Any suggestions welcome.
Sure. Try adding the following options to your Makefile:
-mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8
-bp
--
# bryan at terran dot org
# http://www.terran.org/~bryan
------------------------------
From: Brian Savacool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP address
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:23:51 -0400
does any one know how the network command to view their
IP address
like "winipcfg" in Windows 9x?
thanks
--
Brian "Savo" Savacool
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Synchronizing time between server.
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 06:39:59 GMT
In article <7nbho9$bk3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Holub) wrote:
> In article <7nbgqv$635$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> )Hi,
> )
> )How can I synchronize the time between two Linux servers without
using
> )something complicated as ntp?
>
> Uh, it's a time synchronization protocol; what's complicated about it?
> -Tom
>
Hi,
I downloaded ntp for linux from ntp web site, and its configuration
seemed so daunting that I decided to ask for a better (read simpler)
way. If there isn't, then I gues I do have to work with installing it.
Khurram.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: weird ping
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 02:51:44 -0400
Daniele Vian wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't ping -s 55 localhost or to any other host... Any other packet
> sizes would work, but not 55 bytes! MOreover, doing ping -R localhost,
> the answer is
> RR: localhost (127.0.0.1)
> localhost (127.0.0.1)
> localhost (127.0.0.1)
> localhost (127.0.0.1)
> why 4 entries and not 2 (just one hop)??? My routing table is very
> basic, only the entries for localhost and the default gateway, that's
> it.
> I'm running Linux 2.2.7 (redhat6) on two machines (128.197.22.24 netmask
> 255.255.255.128 and 128.197.22.150 netmask 255.255.255.128 - so in two
> different subnets) connected via a 3com 35000 router.
> I have a lot of problems with other programs, and I guess that this
> weird behavior might be the reason.
> Anyone has an explanation to this fact?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> daniele
>
> --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Daniele Vian /}/}
> , / / }
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ .-=.( ( }
> \'--" `\\_.---,='
> '-, \__/ \___
> 140 Bay State Road, .-'.-.' \___.'
> 02215 Boston MA / // /-..___,-`--'
> `" `"
> --------------------------------------------------------
That is wierd. However, it isn't your network. I thought I'd try the ping
on my network and I got the same repsonses! A packet size of 55bytes just
gets lost and the ping -R localhost shows 4 entries. I have dug through
all the ping info and documentation I can find, but haven't found an
answer.
I will keep looking. Post if you figure this one out.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
