Linux-Networking Digest #49, Volume #12 Thu, 29 Jul 99 19:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: IP Masq with one NIC (Edward Liu)
Re: POP3 (Chip Transisto)
Re: e-mail problems ("Jeff")
HP openview, snmp. MIB ("Jeff")
Re: ppp - Serial line is looped back (Norman Elliott)
Re: modem/ethernet/ipmasq (Rudolf Potucek)
Re: IP Masquerade (John Brashier)
Re: Automatic reconnection using pppd ("Bill Steiner")
password problems with samba and windows 98 clients ("Scott Fleming")
Re: modem/ethernet/ipmasq ("Bill Steiner")
Re: DNS name with primary and secondary IP (Rudolf Potucek)
Re: can't see network (Rudolf Potucek)
Firewall on Linux ("Kenneth Soh @ BTM Singapore")
unknown networkcard (Christoph Weber)
Re: Compaq/TLAN nic woes ("Lee Sharp")
New wannabee <--> Mail server, forget it...? ("Kristian Andersen")
Creating mailing lists ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: POP Mail ("D.Krivitsky")
Re: ftp uploading, man ftpaccess sucks! (Jeff Greer)
Re: Problem launching CGI scripts with Apache (Monte Phillips)
Has anyone tried ARK cards in linux?
Re: unknown networkcard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tricky dialup problem (Alan)
Re: Linux and ADSL how to----does one exist?? (sparks)
Re: 2.2.10, DNS, and module problems (Craig Brown)
Re: ARP requesting on IP address (Bernd Eckenfels)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Liu)
Subject: Re: IP Masq with one NIC
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:15:46 -0700
Hey Sam,
I don't know if I'm getting a really big performance hit. Before I could
get upwards of 300 KB/s if I was lucky, and I don't see anything above 260
KB/s now. I don't know if that is because of the IP masquerading or
because of circumstantial stuff. I do notice that I'm getting a high
number of collisions on my hub, so there probably is some sort of
slowdown.
I agree that 2 network cards would be infinitely better, but alas, I can't
fit another one in. I would if I could though.
bye.
In article <rCOn3.127$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Samuel Nguyen
<"sxn"@netzero.net NOSPAM> wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> I was wondering if your cable connection takes a performance hit
> behind the Maquerading. I have the same setup as you (Linux, RR, uplink
> hub, etc) and it works ok, but the thing is that it is a lot slower
> behind Linux. If I was directly connected, i could get up to 160 KB/s.
> Behind Linux, I rarely get much faster than 30 KB/s. David Wood, one of
> the authors of the IP Masq HOWTO told me that 2 network cards would be
> much better, so I plan to move up to that configuration soon. Just wanted
> to share with you...
>
> Sam
>
> Edward Liu wrote:
>
> > Thanks to everybody who responded. The IP aliasing did the trick and
> > everything is hunky dory (sp?).
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: POP3
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:20:33 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
Yes, I know. As my message said, I installed imap (rpm -i imap*.rpm)
but I still don't have POP. In 5.2, all you had to do was install
imap. In 6.0 there is another step since a simple install won't work.
My question was, does anyone know what the extra step is after you
install imap?
Thanks.
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:37:17 +0200, daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>pop3 is in the imap package
>
>rpm -i imap*
>
>//dan
>
>
>Ozan ERCAN wrote:
>>
>> I setup red hat 6.0 yet. There is sendmail on it. But does it means POP3
>> support or not ?
>>
>> If not. How can i configure POP3 support ?
------------------------------
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: e-mail problems
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:21:29 -0400
Matthew wrote in message ...
>Hi,
>
>I can't help you with the programs you are using, but I have done a
>similar thing myself. I gave up with sendmail - it is a bummer of a beast
>to set up: try exim from www.exim.org - works wonderfully with practically
>no configuration to do (at least it's understandable!). Fetchmail was the
>same. For the Pop-3 server I use qpopper - you just install and run it and
>it does the rest. I can't remember it's web site, but I think it comes
>from a company called Qualcomm.
Try http://www.eudora.com/freeware
------------------------------
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HP openview, snmp. MIB
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:00:21 -0400
I recently landed an internship for the fall semester. In this internship I
will be implementing HP openview on an HP-UX.
To get geared up for this I want to do some research before I get started. I
have found ucd-snmp tools available for linux which I could install and work
with on my home network, but this would be very limited and I don;t know
how much I could gleen from it.
what I need to know is, where can I find screenshots of hp opnview on the
web. And is there an app that closely resembles hp - openview available for
free download that I could install on one of my home linux machines.
any help would be great
thanx in advance
Jeff
------------------------------
From: Norman Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp - Serial line is looped back
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:01:27 +0000
"W.G. Unruh" wrote:
> "Cameron Gregg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> b
> >i have a feeling that the "Serial line is looped back." may be the cause.
> >What does this line mean and how do I remedy it?
>
> It means tht when ppp sends out something, it gets the same thing back.
> You could try switching of echo on your modem, as that can sometimes be the problem
> even though modems are supposed to switch of f echo themselves once they connect.
> Another poss. is that you are not connecting, and the modem is always
> in command mode.
>
If you have a default route set up to your loopback device you cannot connect to the
internet.
You might try
route del default
before you try to connect
best wishes,
norm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf Potucek)
Subject: Re: modem/ethernet/ipmasq
Date: 29 Jul 1999 20:11:56 GMT
Yes.
Read dejanews on the posts in this newsgroup. Both pppd (part of most
Linux releases) and diald (can get it somwhere on the net) can do
autodialing on demand, so all you have to do is set up your 'worse' PC to
use the 'better' PC as a gateway, set the better PC up as gateway (i.e.
route all requests to the real world to ppp0, masquerade) and set up pppd
or diald on the 'better' PC to autodial. Done (maybe a day's work).
Rudolf
jason mccarthy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: hi,
: wondering if this is possible.
: i want to connect two pc's with an ethernet card in my apartment.
: the pc with the better modem (running linux) connects to the internet.
: the other pc gets net access through the better pc.
: is this possible?
: how would it work?
: j (the newbie)
: --
: Dan Quayle, 9/15/88: "The Holocaust was an obscene period
: in our nation's history. I mean in this century's history. But we all
: lived in this century. I didn't live in this century."
--
------------------------------
From: John Brashier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP Masquerade
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:29:00 -0700
Jan Johansson wrote:
> > can IP Masq be installed during the initial install of Linux
>
> Not on slack or Redhat atleast. It has to be configged after instal.
What exactly is the command line(s) to do this?
Thanks,
John
------------------------------
From: "Bill Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Automatic reconnection using pppd
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:15:59 -0700
You can also use the network configuration GUI that comes with RedHat 6.0
(and maybe others) to set up your ppp connections and it has the
autoreconnect feature.
Guillaume BRIALON wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>I haven't found any pppd version implementing the -demand, -persist, and
>-idle options.
>These are very usefull for automatic reconnection.
>Does someone knows a pppd version enabling these options?
>Else, how do you enable automatic reconnection without these?
>
>Thanx.
>
>Guilaume Brialon.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Scott Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: password problems with samba and windows 98 clients
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 05:28:57 GMT
A small 3 pc network, on a hub, 2 windows98 machines and my 5.2 RH machine,
I'm having trouble with getting the RH machine to allow the windows clients
to browse the share folders on the linux machine.
To date I have the following configured:
All pc's show in the network nieghborhood browse window. When accessing the
RH machine, it prompts me for a password, to log in to the RH machine. I was
told to edit the /etc/passwd file, and on the line of the file that contains
the login for the host requesting access add the NOPASSWORD text. Still is
not working, and after reading several HOWTO's, mini HOWTO's and HOWNOTTO's,
I'm thoroghly convinced that this is a difficult thing to configure.
Any assistance is *greatly* appreciated.
Thanks,
Hawkwynd
------------------------------
From: "Bill Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem/ethernet/ipmasq
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:30:09 -0700
You bet, Jason. It works quite well. I'm a newbie too. I recently built a
Linux router set up to dial up our ISP to provide internet service to a
small network of Windows PCs. Recommend you have a look at HOWTOs and
miniHOWTOs (in /usr/doc/) on NET3, PPP. There's also one on setting up PPP
connections with your ISP. Also be sure to look at the mini-HOWTO on
IP-MASQUERADING; it is very well organized and written, and saved me a lot
of time. If you're using an older Linux distribution, suggest you get the
latest of these HOWTOs at metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/.
Good luck and enjoy.
Bill Steiner
jason mccarthy wrote in message
<01bed9da$b829d600$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>hi,
>wondering if this is possible.
>i want to connect two pc's with an ethernet card in my apartment.
>the pc with the better modem (running linux) connects to the internet.
>the other pc gets net access through the better pc.
>
>is this possible?
>how would it work?
>
>j (the newbie)
>
>--
>Dan Quayle, 9/15/88: "The Holocaust was an obscene period
>in our nation's history. I mean in this century's history. But we all
>lived in this century. I didn't live in this century."
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf Potucek)
Subject: Re: DNS name with primary and secondary IP
Date: 29 Jul 1999 20:17:13 GMT
nD ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Is it possible to set up a DNS name that has a primary and secondary IP
: address?
I seem to remember that the bind manpage or the DNS howto said you can
give the same name to multiple addresses and then bind will rotate
through the responses, so as to achieve load leveling ...
: If so, can DNS detect that a primary is down and therefore
: switch to the secondary?
Can the server detect that? I don't think so.
Can the client detect that a nameserver is not responding and use a
secondary? Certainly, that's why the /etc/resolf.conf should contain at
least 2 nameservers and these should be on different networks.
Rudolf
: TIA.
: --
: Conversation would be vastly improved by the constant use of four
: simple words: I do not know. -Andr Maurois
: Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
: Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf Potucek)
Subject: Re: can't see network
Date: 29 Jul 1999 20:24:42 GMT
Hmmm, a trivial question. As it looks lie a PnP setup to me, are you
certain you've got the two cards detected the right way around? I treally
would't do if you, in essence, had the cabling for internal and external
networks switched.
Rudolf
: eth0: 3Com 3c515 at 0x280, 00:10:4b:d9:49:9b, DMA 6, IRQ 9
: eth1: 3Com 3c515 at 0x300, 00:10:4b:d9:44:b9, DMA 7, IRQ 10
^^^^^
--
------------------------------
From: "Kenneth Soh @ BTM Singapore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,aus.computers.linux,comp.security.firewalls,list.firewall,lists.firewalls,tnn.internet.firewall
Subject: Firewall on Linux
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 20:23:19 +0800
Can someone tell me some mainstream Firewall products in Linux ?
Please cc your reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you and regards,
Kenneth
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph Weber)
Subject: unknown networkcard
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:24:44 GMT
Hi!
I have got a networkcard from an old computer but I don't know which
card it is. Therefore I tried to load some networkmodules in linux and
some were loaded successfully. Can I be sure that these modules work
with this card or is it possible that I can't create a network
connection?
Are there other ways to find out which card it is? Are there any
programs for win95/98 or linux?
thanx in advance.
bye, chris
PGP Key-ID:0xC0D1CD28
------------------------------
From: "Lee Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compaq/TLAN nic woes
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:33:04 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7nq4hu$uai$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
|Basically, everything under linux looks like it should work. Only,
|nothing ever hits the wire. I'm not sure what else to check and could
|really use some suggestions.
As root, type "insmod tlan duplex=2" and check your configuration. If it
comes up, you just have to load the module at boot time before the
networking daemons start.
Lee
--
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. * Black
holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an individual, not
as a representative of any company, organization or other entity. I am
solely responsible for my words.
------------------------------
From: "Kristian Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New wannabee <--> Mail server, forget it...?
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 23:38:09 +0200
I have read nearly all documentation on SSLUG and my SUSE 6.1 and I still
don't get it.
Is it only there to tell every body how vise they are and tell me how slow I
am.
I'm trying to set up Fetchmail to poll mail and sendmail as a SMTP....
Nothing is working, except mail for root, file sharing and internet access.
Any sugestions.........
They will be recived by me prasing the moon, sun and the stars.
(And the sender. if it works.)
--
Regards
K.Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Creating mailing lists
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 20:49:52 GMT
HELLO!
Can someone describe me how to create an own mailing list?
We have to make this for our local problem discussion.
We are students and living on the campus of the university.
So, please help me, if you can! Thank you very much!!!
I have installed redhat linux 6.0
I need only these features:
Subscribing someone to the mailing list when he/she writes a mail
with subject 'subscribe_me_please' to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(name is only an example).
And removes someones mail adress from the list if the subject
contains 'unsubscribe_me_please'.
The name of mailing list should be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When this adress receives a mail it should be forward the
new mail to all subscribers (which have subscribed to to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Additionally I want to that all mails should be collected in
a file for displaying on the webpage (because all the other
students, which do not subscribe, should still have the
possibility to read the stuff)
I have already created the 2 accounts, apache is running fine
and I have read something about 'procmail', but I don't know
where to start...
Again: Thanx a lot!
Erkan Aksit
------------------------------
From: "D.Krivitsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: POP Mail
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:10:47 -0400
D.Krivitsky ����� � ��������� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...
>>I use Linux as an ip masq solution at home. I'd like to do that for him,
>but
>>i've got some questions. He has ONE pop account and his ISP forwards all
>mail
>>to his domain to that account. (Example: if his domain is xyz.com, mail
>sent
>>to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will go to that one pop account.) Is it possible to
>split
>>up that one pop email account into several different ones upon reciept of
>the
>>email, or is he SOL and will have to get more accounts.
>
>
>You may try fetching all mail by /usr/bin/fetchmail and then process it by
>/usr/bin/formail
>to split it.
... or even just pass it to sendmail for further delivery, after receiving
it by fetchmail.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Greer)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ftp uploading, man ftpaccess sucks!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:11:08 GMT
>
>This was my stock ftpaccess with my 5.2 and it seems to work okay. Try
>it...
>
>class all real,guest,anonymous *
>.....
still stuck
u/l will not work for anon ftp
I checked the permissions on dirs, works with other users but not
anonymous.
Something could be wrong in /etc/ftpaccess but I've tried a dozen
combos.
I'm using in.ftpd which is called by inetd. RH 5.2
--
Jeff Greer
B.S. computer science, University of MO - Rolla
==================================================
Windows NT has crashed,
I am the Blue Screen of Death,
No one hears your screams...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Problem launching CGI scripts with Apache
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:18:37 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I encoure problems launching CGI scripts from a
>html page:
>The html source is in the /home/httpd/www
>directory and calls a CGI script in the
>/home/httpd/cgi-bin directory (action='/cgi-
>bin/prog.cgi'). But Netscape doesn't fint the
>script.
Look at your line in the html file you have /cgi-bin/prog.cgi
Think about that, you do not HAVE a /cgi-bin/ directory you have a
/home/httpd/cgi-bin directory. Either change your script so that you
can run the file local (which is what you are doing) or you will have
to set up Apache and alias the path, all of which is in the Apache
HOWTO
You could also simply add that /home/httpd/cgi-bin directory into your
path. ( but that is too easy, which is why I saved it for last)
g'luk
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Has anyone tried ARK cards in linux?
Date: 29 Jul 1999 21:24:19 GMT
ARK makes a $10 10/100 card that uses the realtek 8139 chipset.
Has anyone out there have any linux experience with these cards?
Thanx,
Art Blair.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unknown networkcard
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:47:13 GMT
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:24:44 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph
Weber) wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I have got a networkcard from an old computer but I don't know which
>card it is. Therefore I tried to load some networkmodules in linux and
>some were loaded successfully. Can I be sure that these modules work
>with this card or is it possible that I can't create a network
>connection?
When you don't know the maufacturer and the card type the best idea
is to test with a network connection.
>Are there other ways to find out which card it is? Are there any
>programs for win95/98 or linux?
Probably Win98 could find it (large database). I suggest you to unplug
the rest of the unneedet cards (except graphics card, etc.). Asfter
booting run hardware detection utility....
I hope I helped you!
Erkan
------------------------------
From: Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tricky dialup problem
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:34:30 -0400
I'd like to use my office workstation (running Linux) as an internet
gateway for my home PC. (My office computer is on a university campus
with speedy access, and I don't want to pay $20/month for an ISP for
home access). Specifically, here's what I want to do:
>From my home PC (which is running Windows NT), connect to my office
workstation via modem. Issue a command telling my office workstation to
call back my home computer (so any tolls are charged to my work account
instead of my home account). With the connection established, run
programs like Netscape, Telnet, FTP, etc. on my home computer.
(Basically, I want the Linux machine in my office to function as a
dial-up ISP).
Can this be done? How? (Even a general answer would be fine. Once I
figure out which programs to use -- e.g. mgetty -- I can figure out the
details.)
Many thanks,
Alan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (sparks)
Subject: Re: Linux and ADSL how to----does one exist??
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:59:25 GMT
Wait, I don't think there is any need for everyone to start saying
rtfm. I found the docs on adsl and they look simple enough
my question was
"
What I need to decide is if you open up 100 ports here and 50 ports
there to play a game thru the firewall...what firewall ???
might as well forget a firewall or masquerading and just tie streight
to the pc and play away.
I know there is no problem with ftp, telnet, or surfing the net but
that is not ALL I want to do on my machine.
CAN ??
can I use linux as security and play games on the net ?
"
******
Is is correct to say you can install a firewall, open up half the
ports to different games for net play and still say you have a secure
system?
******
this is the question I was trying to ask
jerry
On 29 Jul 1999 06:47:20 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf
Potucek) wrote:
>Tony C ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>: Rudolf Potucek wrote in message <7nfo08$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>: >RTFM! There must be 1000s of posts at dejanews.com!
>
>: SNIP
>
>: > man ipchains (RH5.x)
>: > man ipfwadm (RH6)
>
>: Looks like you need to RTFM :)
>
>: ipchains is RH6 and ipfwadm is RH 5.x.
>
>: Cheers
>: TC
>
>Well, I guess I deserved that! Still, as far as I am concerned the
>ADSL-Howto should read about like this:
>
>Ask your ISP whether they use (a) dynamic or (b) static IP addresses.
>
>(a) Most ISPs use dynamic addresses so they don't have to deal with
> customers asking for all the info in (b). That is good for you
> because it means all you have to do is call your preferred network
> config tool (netcfg, linuxconf, ...) and set eth0 (or whatever) to
> use DHCP.
>
>(b) Tough luck! Now you have to get all sorts of info out of your ISP:
>
> IP address/hostname for your machine
> IP address/hostname/netmask for the gateway
> IP address/hostname for the nameserver
> IP address/hostname/password for the mailserver
> IP address/hostname/password for the FTP/WEB server where you can
> put those 5 Megs of free Web space
> ...
>
> Now that you actually got all that out of your ISP, read the
> Net-x-Howto. Call your favorite network config tool (netcfg,
> linuxconf, ...) and set eth0 (or whatever), plugging in all the info
> as appropriate.
>
><Tongue-in-Cheek> ;)
>
>Rudolf
------------------------------
From: Craig Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 2.2.10, DNS, and module problems
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:46:48 -0700
I don't have a solution, but have been experiencing the same problem. I
initially encountered the problem when I compiled the kernel (2.2.5-15)
with direct support for my ethernet card. I have since moved to kernel
2.2.10 and the problem persists.
Craig.
"Thomas M. Sasala" wrote:
> To all:
>
> I recently upgraded to 2.2.10 from RH6.0
> (2.2.5-??). In the process I compiled the kernel
> with direct support of my two ethernet cards
> instead of using modules. Ever since then
> I have been getting error messages in the syslog
> about can't find module. Something like:
>
> mod_probe: can't locate module lo:0
> mod_probe: can't locate module lo:1
> ....
> mod_probe: can't locate module lo:49
>
> The same goes for eth0, eth1. Now since
> this only occured during boot up and my networking works
> just fine, I didn't worry too much about it. However, I
> recently added bind to my services. Now I get these messages
> very frequently and they are filling up my log file. It seems that
> named is some how causing the error messages in addition to the boot
> time error messages. My syslog looks like this:
>
> mod_probe: can't locate module lo:0
> ....
> mod_probe: can't locate module lo:49
> mod_probe: can't locate module eth0:0
> ....
> mod_probe: can't locate module eth0:49
> mod_probe: can't locate module eth1:0
> ....
> mod_probe: can't locate module eth1:49
> named[444]: reloading nameserver
> named[444]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].1025
> named[444]: Ready to answer queries
> named[444]: reloading nameserver
> named[444]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].1025
> named[444]: Ready to answer queries
>
> I get the above series of messages about every 1 minute
> for up to 10 minutes. This happens at least once an hour.
>
> I checked the error logs prior to building my own kernel
> and there were no errors about modules. I tried rebuilding my
> kernel with everything selected as a module, but the error message
> were still there. Does anyone have a suggestion? I'm at a loss.
> Thanks.
>
> -Tom
>
> --
> ****************************************************
> ** Send all important email to:
> ** sasala at pop dot dn dot net
> ****************************************************
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ARP requesting on IP address
Date: 29 Jul 1999 22:32:40 GMT
Doyen Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted this to redhat, but no one there has any clue? Can anyone point
> me towards a howto or faq that mentions this error ARP: arp is
> requesting on ip address
is this "own ip address"? In that case it is most of the time a sign of a
messed up routing table. Can you send us the output of "ifconfig" "netstat
-r" and "arp -a"?
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
