Linux-Networking Digest #72, Volume #12 Sat, 31 Jul 99 22:13:37 EDT
Contents:
Re: ethernet driver in Kernel? (Bill Steiner)
Re: Samba Shares Folders I Didn't Set in smb.conf ("Eugene")
Re: Ethernet card installation and configuring (Ashwin Kapur)
Re: Problem with dial-up networking on Linux ("Morris Maynard")
Re: Network unreachable ("Fr�d�ric Bernard")
Re: GNOME PPP Applet -- Unsolved Mystery? (Todd Knarr)
Setting up a Gateway ("Matthew Purcell")
Re: IP masquerading/firewalling with a Sparc running Linux? (eric)
kppp authentication problems (Rajesh)
Re: Apache 1.3.6 excessive forking (possibly mod_proxy) vs Squid (Barrett Richardson)
ARP replies w/ >1 interface on same network (Chuck Musser)
Re: linux-linux masquerade slow (Stephen Satchell)
Re: Cisco 605 DSL "modem" and Linux -- how to configure? (Greg Weeks)
ethernet card problem (Will Stockdell)
Serial ports and external modems..... (Chuck Snively)
Re: Reverse Proxy & Load Balance + Redundancy (stanislav shalunov)
Re: Cisco 605 DSL "modem" and Linux -- how to configure? (Robert V. Grizzard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bill Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: ethernet driver in Kernel?
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 21:57:10 -0700
I'm using the same Netgear NICs as you in two Linux boxes myself. Both are
successfully using the tulip driver that comes with RedHat 6.0. I read
somewhere that not all Netgear FA310TXs are the same. Wish I could remember
where. I think the bottom line is that the later TXs use different cheaper
chips that don't work well with the tulip dirver. The latest TX was
purchased just a week or two ago.
Wondering whether there's anything wrong with your interface setup to cause
this?
Bill Steiner
John Brashier wrote:
> I am having a problem with my ethernet cards. I have two in my machine.
> I can ping the interfaces from the machine they are in, but they cannot
> connect (ping) outside. I read of someone with similar symptoms to mine,
>
> and they installed a different driver than the one included in the
> kernel, and
> voila! I am wondering if anyone can tell me where to find a driver that
> I can
> download, or if the included driver is fine. I am currently using the
> tulip driver
> for both "eth0" and "eth1". The cards are Netgear FA310TX.
>
> Any suggestions? Thanks
> John Brashier
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba Shares Folders I Didn't Set in smb.conf
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:56:00 GMT
> Samba shares a folder I did not specify in smb.conf, namely the /tmp
> folder. Samba shows it under Network Neighborhood as public.
just like the other poster said, this is impossible. Samba shares only the
directories you specify in smb.conf. Check your configuration.
------------------------------
From: Ashwin Kapur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Ethernet card installation and configuring
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:09:36 GMT
It is best to read the Kernel Howto first but if you want to do it quickly,
hate reading modules and know a bit about Un*x, TCP-IP and are computer
friendly in general or just hate reading docs you can probably get away with
the following:
su - root
enter the root passwd
cd /usr/src/linux (or wherever the linux kernel source lives)
(Assuming you are in X) make xconfig
(If you are not in X) make menuconfig
(I personally still use) make config
Answer the questions and thereby configure the kernel for your machine
make dep
make clean
make zlilo
make modules
make modules_install
(Reboot) shutdown -r now
(or maybe /etc/shutdown -r now or /sbin/shutdown -r now)
That's it. Have fun with your new kernel.
Michael J Campbell wrote:
> Hello all-
>
> I have physically installed an ethernet card in my system and am trying
> to configure it for Linux (I am using Red Hat 6.0).
>
> I think I next need to configure and rebuild the kernel - is this the
> correct action or is there an easier way around this - or would it just
> be easier to reinstall Linux (I remember during the setup it asking if I
> wanted to configure the OS for a LAN).
>
> If rebuilding the kernel is the way to go, where are the best sources of
> information to get step-by-step instructions for this.
>
> Thanks much.
------------------------------
From: "Morris Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Problem with dial-up networking on Linux
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:47:47 -0400
I just got this working, and my ISP uses the same 3Com device. I don't
remember the exact config files (and I'm at work where I'm safe from Linux)
but I believe they are these in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/:
pap-secrets
chat-ppp0
ifcfg-ppp0
If you use netcfg from within X-windows, go to the Communications tab and
make sure there are NO Send or Expect strings. Then go to the PAP or CHAP or
CHAT tab (memory again) and enter your username and password there. For
PAP/CHAP authentication to work, the transaction goes on in binary, not as a
text exchange.
Mike Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7mu65s$lb6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have gone through all the HOW-TO's and I am still not able to establish
> a ppp connect with my ISP. Here's what the log file looks like:
>
> Serial connection established.
> Using interface ppp0
> Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500> <magic 0xdabccd7b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> last message repeated 9 times
> LCP: timout sending Config-Requests
> Connection terminated.
> Exit.
>
> I've tried using +pap, +chap, ogin:. Nothing seems to work. I know for a
> fact that they (my ISP) have the 3Com Total Control boxes. I am able
> toconnect from within Win95, and NT.
>
> If anyone can help me I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Fr�d�ric Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Network unreachable
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:11:13 +0200
I had exactly the same problem as you seems to have...
I tried for cards of three different types.. Ether express PRO100,
two 3C509 and finally a 3C900 PCI.. none of them worked..
The PRO100 was a "A" revision and i have read somewhere (on some well known
linux drivers pages)
that only "B" revision is supported by linux.. i'm not sure, but i never was
able to make it even recognized by the kernel...
The 3com cards were set up under linux without problems.. (installing some
module for the 3c900 combo..)
but as they seems to be ok under linux, they were not able to ping a machine
over the local network..
I spend a bit more than two weeks..
Finally, on friday i took a D-Link DFE530TX card, put it inside the linuxed
computer, choosed a basic NE2k-PCI module and it Worked !! I hardly believed
the result of the ping.. I was so much experienced with a pingwithoutpong...
Now, my goal is to be able to moad some up-to-date module for this marvelous
card... LOL
Hope you'll find out how to use your cards.. if you find how, i would be
interrested.; (i have 4 cards lying on my desktop.... <s>)
Good luck
fred
George Laverick a �crit dans le message ...
>I have just added aLinux box to an existing NT network. It is a Dell
>Poweredge 6300 with the RAID controller removed. I have loaded RH 5.1 and
>everything seems to work except networking. I installed TCP/IP with an IP
>address of 192.1.1.94, subnet mask of 255.255.0.0, network of 192.1.0.0
>and broadcast of 192.1.255.255. The computer came with an Intel
>Etherexpress Pro 10/100. When that didn't work, I reinstalled with a 3Com
>3C905, same result. I have tried another 3C905 and two 3C590's, all with
>the same result. I know the 3Com cards are good because I took them out
>of working systems.
>
>Is there something unique about the Dell?
>
>I have run Netconf and Linuxconf and everything looks right to me. Any
>ideas?
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Todd Knarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: GNOME PPP Applet -- Unsolved Mystery?
Date: 1 Aug 1999 00:27:32 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Mladen Gavrilovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ppp applet doesn't have a "properties" selection. When I
> right-click on it, all I get is "remove from panel", "move applet", and
> "about".
Reading the source, the GNOME ppp applet simply runs the scripts
/etc/ppp/ppp-on and /etc/ppp/ppp-off to start and stop the PPP
connection. I simply put these two scripts into place:
/etc/ppp/ppp-on:
#!/bin/sh
ifup ppp0
exit 0
/etc/ppp/ppp-off:
#!/bin/sh
ifdown ppp0
exit 0
Set the ppp0 interface up for user control and everything works
fine. You can make them more complex, eg. check for the lockfiles,
if you feel so inclined.
--
It may be great to soar with the eagles, but weasels don't get sucked into
jets.
------------------------------
From: "Matthew Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Setting up a Gateway
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 10:39:57 +1000
Hi,
Can someone help me set up a gateway on my Linux box (which is running
RedHat 5)? My Windows box is currently networked to my Linux box via a
Ethernet T-10 base LAN. I want to be able to connect to the internet on my
Windows box via my Linux box and I also want to load a firewall onto my
Linux box for added security as well.
Could someone also pls explain to me how to dialup to my ISP through the
command prompt on Linux?
This would be greatly appriciated if you could email me instructions.
Thanks,
Matt
------------------------------
From: eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading/firewalling with a Sparc running Linux?
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:52:56 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once you have a kernel with IP masquerading built in
(not the default; you will most likely have to rebuild the
kernel from source), and set up IP forwarding, it works
quite well. I'm using a Sparc Classic running 2.2.10 and
forwarding for the rest of my machines.
eric olson
Roy Grimm wrote:
>
> I'm working steadily towards getting my home network set up and I'm
> finding myself at a point where I have to make some strategic planning
> decisions.
>
> I don't yet have a DSL/cable modem connection to the internet yet, but
> will when they become available in my area. (within 6 months, based on
> how fast things are progressing in the neighborhoods around me) In the
> mean time, I'm in the process or setting up my Sparc station with
> Linux. Ideally, I would like to have this Sparc play the role of IP
> masquerading server that bridges my home network to the internet. From
> a hardware perspective, I've got what is needed. I have plenty of space
> to add a second ethernet adapter to the Sparc box, connecting one to the
> internal network and the other to the DSL or cable modem. The big
> question remains: How well do the IP masquerading components of the
> 2.2.x kernel run on a Sparc?
>
> I didn't see anything in the IP Masquerade mini HOWTO that said it's
> specific to the x86 platform. Has anyone used a Sparc station to fill
> this role before? If so, can you offer some sage advice to someone who,
> while well seasoned administrating Intel hardware, is relatively new to
> the administration side of the Sparc world?
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Roy Grimm
------------------------------
From: Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kppp authentication problems
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 18:31:26 +0200
Hello netters -
I'm trying to connect via kppp to my ISP. It appears that i'm having
authentication problems. Here's the log from the connection attempt:
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic
0x9f181e66> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> < 11 04 05
f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 82 12 06>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic
0x9f181e66> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <auth pap>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="blah"
password="blah"] Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x1
""] Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: Remote message: Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger
pppd[638]: PAP authentication failed Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: rcvd
[LCP TermReq id=0x1] Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: LCP terminated by peer
Jul 31 17:54:58 jogger pppd[638]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x1]
Jul 31 17:55:01 jogger pppd[638]: Connection terminated.
Jul 31 17:55:02 jogger pppd[638]: Exit.
I'm pretty sure that I have the right username and passwd. It looks like there
is an initial attempt at using CHAP, replaced later by PAP.
Any pointers?
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: Barrett Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,alt.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.6 excessive forking (possibly mod_proxy) vs Squid
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:07:07 -0400
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can Anybody recommend using Apache over Squid as means to load balance
> multiple web servers on cahce content?
>
> If the two are similar has anybody done any bench marks comparing squid
> against apache?
>
> Is Apache a more reliable server than squid?
>
Well, squid really is not a server. In regard to cacheing, Apache would
fork a server per connection. Squid uses a select loop where one process
handles all the connections and multiplexes across them. In regard to
cacheing squid should get more mileage out of available system resources.
It does take some tweaking to get real time performance under heavy loads.
I have a squid box that sustains connection rates of 100k per hour during
prime time with no problem. It is not a reverse proxy but a transparent
cache. I get a hit rate around %50.
-
Barrett
> Thank you,
>
> N
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Darrell Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >I'm experiencing an enormous amount of forking occurring with my
> Apache
> > >server. I have a lightweight Apache configured with mod_proxy - it
> should
> > >simply be forwarding most requests through to a heavy-weight mod_perl
> > >enabled Apache running on another port, or serving static pages
> itself.
> >
> > mod_proxy forks a garbage collection process after each hit.
> > You might want to use Squid as an accelerator instead of Apache.
> >
> > Tony.
> > --
> > f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998
> >
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Chuck Musser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ARP replies w/ >1 interface on same network
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 18:20:52 -0700
Hi,
I've having some trouble with using a Linux machine to test a bunch of
Ethernet-to-ATM bridge devices.
Here's my setup:
1.) One client PC with Linux 2.2.10 and 4 Adaptec Quartet 4-port
Ethernet boards, each port connected to one bridge.
2.) The bridges all connect to a single class B network
3.) A multihomed server with 16 addresses on the class B net.
4.) Host routes on the client that route traffic bound for one of the
server's IP address through a specific Ethernet interface. So an FTP
session with 172.18.1.1 always goes through eth1, for example.
Here's what happens:
Traffic bound for a given IP address on the server always makes it
through the correct interface. Return traffic, however, can come through
__any__ of the interfaces. After a bit of snooping with tcpdump, I
discovered that when the server sends out ARP requests, the request is
"heard" by all the interfaces (because they are all in the same
broadcast domain), and they all respond with their own MAC address.
There is probably nothing wrong with this behavior in the normal case.
However, my goal is to use the machine to simulate 16 individual
computers. If the return traffic drifts between interfaces, I can't
measure throughput and reliabilty with any accuracy.
I'm looking at two ways around this: 1.) Some sort of tricky subnetting
or 2.) modifying the kernel's ARP behavior to be more selective. Anyone
have any ideas about which is the best way to proceed?
Thanks,
Chuck
------------------------------
Subject: Re: linux-linux masquerade slow
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Satchell)
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:11:11 GMT
It depends on what you have already done. If you have followed the
directions in the various HOWTO documents, you have a series of rules
using /sbin/ipchains to filter and to some extent to steer the traffic,
and also some routes in your routing table to tell the system how your
local network is connected.
The key thing is in the series of /sbin/ipchains calls, you should have
some rules that looks something like
#replace 10.1.1.0/24 with your local subnet description.
LOCAL=10.1.1.0/24
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s $LOCAL -d $LOCAL -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s $LOCAL -j MASQ
This guarantees that any local traffic stays out of the masquarade
system.
Disclaimer: I'm fairly new to this, and so this may not be the optimal
solution to the problem. I find it works for me, at least so far.
Indeed, working with my local network and tcpdump(8) sitting on the
untrusted network, I find the above code does *not* forward anything to
the outside world that it shouldn't.
In your routing table, make sure there is an entry for your local network
that looks something like...
10.1.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
(the network 10.1.1.0 and mask 255.255.255.0 would be different for your
particular network.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charles Stack) wrote in
<bwKo3.2015$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>How can we be sure that we aren't routing our calls to the outside?
>
>Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> It sounds like you are forwarding internal requests to the outside.
>> Are you using IPCHAINS? You should be if you are not. Make sure that
>> your forwarding chain does not masquarade local connections.
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: Cisco 605 DSL "modem" and Linux -- how to configure?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:39:35 -0500
In article <c7Jo3.1603$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Joel Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just upgraded to DSL, and it works just fine under Windows 98. I have the
> Cisco 605, which I'm told is really a router masquerading as a modem, and it
> works just fine -- for Windows 98. (It connects with Dial-up Networking.)
>
> For those who are confused, or not familiar with the Cisco 605, it's a PCI
> board, not the external box, and the only connections it has (other than, of
> course, the internal ones) are two phone jacks. Through the modern miracle
> of DSL, I have my fax/modem plugged into the other jack on the Cisco card,
> and can send a fax at the same time that I have a DSL connection. Pretty
> neat.
>
> What isn't neat is that I can find no way of configuring this to work under
> Linux. I've done an online search, and asked some knowledgeable people, and
> what I keep hearing is something to the effect of, "no problem -- just plug
> your network card into the Cisco router, which has the obvious problem of
> there be no place to plug a network card into the board, in the first place,
> and secondly, I don't actually have a network card installed in the machine
> at this time.
>
> Which leads to the obvious question: how do I get a connection under Linux?
You need to either a) write the Linux drivers, or b) get the 675
external router. As far as I can tell no one is bothering to write
drivers for the 605. I've not seen any programming information on it
at all either. The 675 is trivial to use with any operating system.
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: Will Stockdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ethernet card problem
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 01:29:53 GMT
I'm trying to connect a Win95 box with a Linux box using two new 8029
based PCI ne2k compatible cards. The cards have both RJ45 and BNC
connections.
The "network on" LED never lights on either card. The manufacturer's
diagnostics report that there is no network cable connected. The cards
are connected with an RJ45 UTP Category 5 cable. The cards seem to be
properly recognized by both OS's. I can ping the card from the local
host on either machine but I can't reach the other machine from either
OS.
I've checked the EEPROM configuration and both are configured for
10base-T.
I've swapped the cable with another identical cable with no change.
Do the BNC connectors need to be terminated? Do I have the wrong type
cable? Are my cards bad? Any guesses?
Thanks,
Will
------------------------------
From: Chuck Snively <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Serial ports and external modems.....
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 21:58:36 -0500
Hi all,
I have two external modems I am trying to configure to run on serial
ports(1 and 2).
I configured serial port 1 in Minicom as /dev/ttyS0 and I could accept
incoming calls as well as dial out, no probs.
Serial port 2, however, is giving me a heck of a time. I have tried to
configure the serial port with Minicom and can't access the modem at
all. I configured it in Minicom as /dev/ttyS1.
Can I even run a modem from both serial ports? I'd find it hard to
believe that I couldn't.
I have read the following How-Tos:
Serial, Modem and I have read the man pages for setserial.
Please help!
Your responses are greatly appreciated.
Chuck Snivley
------------------------------
From: stanislav shalunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,microsoft.public.proxy,alt.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Reverse Proxy & Load Balance + Redundancy
Date: 31 Jul 1999 22:14:16 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Can you use reverse proxy as load balancer as well as cahcing
> mechanis for your web frarms? Has anybody done it? Any literature on
> the net?
Yes, you can use NetApp NetCache box this way. Not a very cheap
solution, but if you have money to burn, sure. It works very good,
but still isn't worth the investment, IMHO. What's your target load?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert V. Grizzard)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Cisco 605 DSL "modem" and Linux -- how to configure?
Date: 1 Aug 1999 01:48:31 GMT
In article <c7Jo3.1603$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>I just upgraded to DSL, and it works just fine under Windows 98. I have the
>Cisco 605, which I'm told is really a router masquerading as a modem, and it
>works just fine -- for Windows 98. (It connects with Dial-up Networking.)
>
>For those who are confused, or not familiar with the Cisco 605, it's a PCI
>board, not the external box, and the only connections it has (other than, of
>course, the internal ones) are two phone jacks. Through the modern miracle
>of DSL, I have my fax/modem plugged into the other jack on the Cisco card,
>and can send a fax at the same time that I have a DSL connection. Pretty
>neat.
>
>What isn't neat is that I can find no way of configuring this to work under
>Linux. [snip]
And you won't.
What you have is a WinModem for ADSL.
>From http://www.uswest.com/products/data/dsl/setup.html#modems:
#Overview of 675 and 605 modems:
#Cisco 675 External Modem Cisco 605 Internal Card
Modem
[snip]
#Windows 95, 98, NT4,MAC Windows 95, 98, NT4
#and UNIX compatible. compatible only.
[snip]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
