Linux-Networking Digest #99, Volume #12 Tue, 3 Aug 99 21:13:42 EDT
Contents:
Re: DHCP problems with REDHAT (Bradford Hamilton)
Re: 3c509 (Matt Menze)
integrated ethernet on docking station (Daniel Walker)
Re: SAMBA (Richard Seymour)
plain old remote access, plus ppp (beej-a)
Re: integrated ethernet on docking station (Daniel Walker)
Linux and Windows NT network ("Olivier Pidoux")
NE2000 problems ("JohnDoe")
Samba slow one direction only! (Oliver Nelson)
Re: NE2000 problems ("Mark Birdsill")
Ifmail - error in compile ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Dial-up backup to DSL ("Andrey Smirnov")
Setting up a Network with Win 95 & 98 ("PTMG")
Re: Firewall won't let me see ISP ("mikes")
Re: Can anybody tell me what this message means? (ICMP) (Harry Palmer)
Re: Telnet on Second NIC ("Trevor Porter")
Post Diald action (Andy Schaefer)
Re: Samba : override file permissions ("staehler")
majordomo problems
Re: how to find the owner/admin of x.x.x.*? ("Andrey Smirnov")
smbclient setup. HELP! ("David B. Hostetler")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bradford Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP problems with REDHAT
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 14:29:50 -0400
I had a similar problem - turned out that the NIC card on win95 was set to
address 0x210, instead of the "normal" 0x300.
This may not be the answer to your issue, but double-check the IRQ/address.
Brad Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew H. George wrote:
> hi, i was totally unable to get dhcpcd to work with a previous
> installation.
> so, i did a clean install of Red Hat 6.0
> when i try to run dhcpcd, it pauses for a while and times out
> the actually error message in /var/log/dhcpcd.log:
>
> Aug 1 11:04:18 localhost dhcpcd[577]: timed out waiting for a valid DHCP
> server response
>
> the connections works perfectly in win95, so i know it's "alive".
> alarmingly, i can't get an IP even when i boot off of the boot/rook
> disks and try to do a Red Hat ftp/install. it says that it can't get a
> valid response.
>
> when i try to run "ifup eth0" it says that it is detering the IP
> address and then outputs
> "Operation Failed". i can't seem to get this working.. the ethernet
> card works fine, i used to have it on an ethernet network -- which is
> why i did a total clean install. i thought that previous ethernet
> configurations maybe interfering, but that's not the case.
>
> i'm using RoadRunner in Fairfax, VA --- many other people have been able
> to get it working, especially "out of the box". do you have any
> suggestions?
> Thank you.
>
> Andrew George
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Matt Menze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c509
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 11:32:20 -0700
How do you send the host name to the DHCP server? Thanks
Stephen Satchell wrote:
> 20 seconds? The problem is with DHCP, not with the card itself. Sounds
> like your ISP's DHCP server and your system don't like each other.
>
> Determine which DHCP client you are using. Then start fiddling with
> options until the DHCP server gives you an IP address.
>
> What did it for me (after getting the latest version of pump for my Red
> Hat 6.0 system) was to send the host name to the DHCP server -- it was
> wanting to see that.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Menze) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I am having trouble getting my 3c509B ethernet card to be recognized by
> >Linux. Kernel version is 2.2.5. On bootup, it attempts to initialize
> >eth0, but after about 20 seconds it says "Operation Failed." When I
> >type ifconfig, all that is found is the loopback. I am loading the
> >driver as a module right now. Do I need to compile support for this
> >driver in the kernel?
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: integrated ethernet on docking station
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:12:58 GMT
I'm a total linux newbie, and was unable to find any information on
this specific topic, even on a webpage devoted to linux on this
particular laptop model.
System: Gateway Solo 2500 (arrives tomorrow)
I opted for the "mini-docking station" option when I ordered; this
advertises "integrated ethernet." Since I wasn't planning on installing
linux at the time I ordered the system, I figured this would be just
fine.
My question is this, for anyone who might know: What is the nature of
this "integrated ethernet?" How does the system interface with it?
(serial, PCMCIA, etc.) And, if anyone knows, is there any way to get
linux to recognize it? am i gonna have to plunk down for a PCMCIA NIC?
thanks in advance to all who reply!
------------------------------
From: Richard Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SAMBA
Date: 03 Aug 1999 17:42:22 -0400
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Check out http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
and check out the comp.protocols.smb newsgroup.
- -Rich
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBN6diOeYph+8+xRa1AQGxTwQAguRbRsXQV9piNE+8sVTjjWiuLQ1WIkG4
Zji1sBEQ0niR4Kc2ujx9GBTKGz74MiCFxqdqLX0IEJwz/hO4fohB406p5LFrnkTn
dMb5ftxJDMvGC4aJ1qLiyACeiCfodBgm/h2XLiVquqj6bjDaguq0C/dGzZYqB/U3
psaavFJAEcQ=
=3/np
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: beej-a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: plain old remote access, plus ppp
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:24:45 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, this is currently my kernel IP routing table:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
206.196.96.77 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 206.196.96.77 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
i'm trying right now to be able to ftp/telnet/etc. my box from another
computer (win95) via eth0 (192.168.1.2) with the ppp still working. it's
possible that the NIC card on the win32 system may be corrupt; however if
there's something terribly wrong that's very obvious that jumped out at
you please let me know. i hope (much later) to eventually be able to try
out the ip_masq module, but 4now just this step is bugging me (the rest
seems pretty straight 4ward). thanx; later bj
------------------------------
From: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: integrated ethernet on docking station
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:20:19 GMT
Another note -- I haven't picked a distribution yet. Any suggestions? I
had a good eight months of end-user-type UNIX experience, but that was a
few years back, so I'm somewhat rusty. Also, I've got two weeks to get
things up and running before school starts, and at that time the Win98
partition will be considered "mission critical"; i.e., it's required for
engineering classes.
Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> I'm a total linux newbie, and was unable to find any information on
> this specific topic, even on a webpage devoted to linux on this
> particular laptop model.
>
> System: Gateway Solo 2500 (arrives tomorrow)
>
> I opted for the "mini-docking station" option when I ordered; this
> advertises "integrated ethernet." Since I wasn't planning on installing
> linux at the time I ordered the system, I figured this would be just
> fine.
>
> My question is this, for anyone who might know: What is the nature of
> this "integrated ethernet?" How does the system interface with it?
> (serial, PCMCIA, etc.) And, if anyone knows, is there any way to get
> linux to recognize it? am i gonna have to plunk down for a PCMCIA NIC?
>
> thanks in advance to all who reply!
------------------------------
From: "Olivier Pidoux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux and Windows NT network
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:00:08 -0400
Hi
How can I connect linux to a NT network ??
Thanks
Olivier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "JohnDoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NE2000 problems
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:33:01 +0200
Hi!
I can't get RedHat6.0 to detect my NE2000 compatible nic. Anyone got a
simple solution exceptfrom buying a new card???
------------------------------
From: Oliver Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba slow one direction only!
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 13:06:31 -0700
Anyone please help (no response in samba newsgroup!),
I'm running Samba 2.0.5a on Suse 6.1. I've had this problem with Samba versions I've
tried before. From my Win98 machine, I can copy files to my Samba Server at very good
speeds. But if I then go to open or copy those files back, it runs but very slow.
Like
if I go to play a MP3 file that is on the Samba box, it is extremely choppy, but will
play
all the way through. Or even to just use DOS type command on a large (1mb) text file.
My
log file looks OK. There is something about requested 10000 open files but only 1014
available. If this is important I will send the log file. Below is my smb.conf. 1
meg
file will open in approx. 1 min 30 sec where as I can copy 127 megs to the Samba box
in
approx 2 min.
Thanx for any advice
OLIVER
P.S. Tried with & without oplocks, but to no avail. Also, with telnet, sz command, it
is
not very fast either. Tried changing workstation to half duplex, no avail. Do i need
to
change Linux nic settings? If so, how?
[global]
workgroup = PROG
guest account = nobody
security = user
comment = Alice.Wonderland Samba %v
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
map to guest = Bad User
wins support = no
oplocks = false
[homes]
comment = Share for users
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
path = %H
locking = no
directory mode = 0777
; The following share gives all users access to the Server's CD drive,
; assuming it is mounted under /cd. To enable this share, please remove
; the semicolons before the lines
;
[cdrom]
comment = Linux CD-ROM
path = /cdrom
read only = yes
locking = no
------------------------------
From: "Mark Birdsill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NE2000 problems
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:28:32 -0500
Hi John,
I have noticed that if your using a dual boot system and windows is setup
with certain IRQ's, you sometimes have to specify these same settings to
Linux. Check the networking and other how-to docs for more specific help.
regards,
Mark
JohnDoe wrote in message <02Lp3.1313$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi!
>
>I can't get RedHat6.0 to detect my NE2000 compatible nic. Anyone got a
>simple solution exceptfrom buying a new card???
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Ifmail - error in compile
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:08:21 GMT
I am trying to compile ifmail-1.20, but keep getting this:
=== Begin iferr.txt ===
[root@k4 ifmail-2.10]# make
for d in iflib ifgate ifcico; do (cd $d && echo $d && make all) ||
exit; done;
iflib
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/ifmail-2.10/iflib'
gcc -O2 -Wall -I. -DDEBUGFILE=\""/var/log/ifmail/ifdebug"\"
-DLOGFILE=\""/var/lo
g/ifmail/iflog"\" -DCONFIGFILE=\""/etc/ifmail/config"\"
-DLOCKDIR=\""/var/lock"\
" -DPUBDIR=\""/home/ftp/pub/files"\" -DMAILLOG=LOG_LOCAL0
-DNEWSLOG=LOG_LOCAL0 -
DCICOLOG=LOG_LOCAL0 -DHAS_STATFS -DSTATFS_IN_VFS_H -DHAS_SETSID
-DHAS_NDBM_H -DD
ONT_HAVE_TM_GMTOFF -DHAS_TERMIOS_H -DASCII_LOCKFILES -DHAS_FSYNC
-DHAS_IOCTL_H -
DHAS_REGEX_H -DHAS_TCP -DFORCEINTL -DHAS_SYSLOG -DNEED_UUCPFROM
-DNEED_BSY -DREG
EX_NEED_CARET -DSLAVE_SENDS_NAK_TOO -DNEED_FORK -c lutil.c
lutil.c:35: parse error before `('
lutil.c:42: parse error before `if'
make[1]: *** [lutil.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ifmail-2.10/iflib'
make: *** [all] Error 2
[root@k4 ifmail-2.10]# === End iferr.txt ===
How can I fix this, or can I?
KS
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dial-up backup to DSL
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:47:49 -0700
Hello,
You may work on the script that runs every so often (from cron for example)
and pings some host on the Net (for example the default gateway for your
Linux box) and if line is down you then can change your default gateway to
ppp vs. eth0.
Then the same script would try to ping your eth interface (which is going to
be back up as soon as DSL problem is resolved) and change default gateway
again.
Good luck!
Anja Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7o7kpm$lm8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone have any ideas on the best way to have an automatic backup for DSL?
>
> The idea and setup:
> One Slackware Linux box performing IP Masq. for a bunch of Windows
> machine on a LAN. The Linux box would be connected to the Internet via
> DSL, but needs to check somehow to see if the connection is live. If it
> isn't, it needs to automatically dial up, send a page to the
> administrator, and generally keep on with it's business (nothing but a
> gateway).
>
> Another idea would be to do the same with a Windows machine as the
> gateway, but I've had a much easier time with Linux and IP Masq, than with
> Windows and Wingate!
>
> The important thing is to have those machines on the LAN always connected
> to the Internet. Also, we can't have anyone manually dialing up.
> Hopefully, with the DSL, we won't ever need the dial-up back up, but we
> need to have it available and working.
>
> Any ideas? Thanks,
> -Anja
>
>
> --
>
> -Anja Hansen To send mail, replace "nospam"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "cs"
------------------------------
From: "PTMG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Setting up a Network with Win 95 & 98
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:10:46 -0400
Hello All!
We are trying to setup a network where the Linux machine (version 6.0 RH) is
the gateway to the Internet. We have 10 computers with Win 95 or 98 on them
that we wish to be able to access the Linux computer in order to set up the
network.
The network card we have is a 3COM 3c509 card, and as far as I can tell, it
is installed properly onto the Linux machine. My question is: What do I do
next? I am not that familiar with setting up a network, but I figured if I
can setup Linux and get it to work, I must not be doing too badly :-)
Any ideas / suggestions or links to proper documentation would be greatly
appreciated. Respond to the group or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get me
directly. Thanks in advace!
Darryl
------------------------------
From: "mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall won't let me see ISP
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:03:14 -0500
Reply-To: "mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allen Wong wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Please post the output of the following commands from your Samba
>server.
>
>/sbin/ifconfig -a
>/sbin/route
OK, here they are. I logged the outputs while dialed in to my ISP, and with
ipchains "active".
for ifconfig -a, I have:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:6F:1B:96
inet addr:192.168.1.254 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:87 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:50 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x240
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:70:96:50
inet addr:192.168.32.254 Bcast:192.168.32.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1542 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x260
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:591 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:591 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
And for route, I have:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.1.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.32.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.32.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 192.168.32.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
I hope you can make sense of the routing table.
Thanks in advance,
-Mike
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harry Palmer)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.misc
Subject: Re: Can anybody tell me what this message means? (ICMP)
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:06:26 GMT
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 12:21:11 +0200, Dmitrij Malakhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, pr0d wrote:
>
>>
>> Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:7o585g$cqr$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > Sounds like somebody is sending an invalid ping or traceroute packet.
>> > Not sure what you can do about it though...
>> >
>> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harry Palmer) wrote:
>> > >
>> > > "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx sent an invalid ICMP error to a broadcast"
>> > >
>> > > This bombards my console constantly. What is it and what can I do
>> > > about it? I can't seem to get any info on the originating IP address.
>> > >
>> > > I'd be grateful for any advice here.
>> > >
>> > > Harry
>>
>> i get that on my lan, apparently one of the nt servers does that; why, i
>> dont know; how to fix it, dont know either; how not to see it, i only
>> wish...
>> good luck...
>>
>
>could it be a war for master-browsing? Or some software on the NT server
>broadcasting 'special' requests? Some LAN management software?
>Could someone tell if SNMP could cause that?
>
>Tell us more about the NT server, any PDCs? That would not be considered
>off-topic, since the problem shows itself on a Linux machine.. :))
>
>Regards
>
>Dmitrij
"A war for master browsing"??? You guy's almost talk a foreign
language to me, but this seems to be on the right track Dmitrij. The
network I'm on is an NT domain, and I either boot linux or NT with the
same ip address and network config.
I only get these wierd messages in a linux console (but not in an X
terminal for some reason).
The NT domain I'm in has about 300 workstations in a tightly
administered environment, so it seems unlikely that any kind of
hacking will be going on, and more likely that something odd and
microsofty may will be going on - dunno what though. I can't resolve
any info on the machine in question with MS tools like nbtstat, are
there any methods I could try from linux?
Nobody has actually said what the message _means_ but thanks for your
thoughts anyway fellas.
Harry
------------------------------
From: "Trevor Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet on Second NIC
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:17:34 -0230
The hosts.allow was empty (as was the hosts.deny) since this is a pretty new
server. However, when logged into the server, I can telnet to my outside
card (198.165.xxx.xxx) but when I try to telnet to my inside card 10.x.x.x,
I get the Escape character is ^] and that's as far as it goes. I don't get
a login: prompt and have to end the session with ^].
Is there any way that the card may not be initialized for inet services? I
can ping it locally and from the rest of my network. I can ping out through
it to other servers. Curious.
Thanks Again,
Trevor
Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7o7hoj$m75$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> Telnet is not listenning on IP addresses it's doing it on port.
>
> Check your configuration file /etc/hosts.allow to see if you allow hosts
> from your internal network to login via telnet.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Trevor Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7o7fgj$7tl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I'm running RH6.0 and had it set up fine with one NIC. This has a real
IP
> > and I can telnet to it no problem.
> >
> > I've added a second NIC and put it on my internal network. It works
fine
> > (can ping all around through it and can ping it from other wkstns) but
it
> > seems like telnet isn't listening on that IP. Is this possible? Again,
I
> > can telnet to one, but not to the other.
> >
> > Suggestions?
> > Thanks,
> > Trevor
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Andy Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Post Diald action
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 18:26:09 -0500
Does anyone know of a way to execute a script once Diald has brought up
the PPP link? I don't want to have to resort to a cron job that runs
real often to see if the ppp0 device exists.
Thanks,
Andy Schaefer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "staehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Samba : override file permissions
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:30:20 +0200
Reply-To: "staehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Olivier Verloove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Samba 2.0.4b on a Linux box and accessing via NT 4.0 client.
> I have some files on the Linux box which are readable only for root and
> I would like to access them from the NT via Samba.
> Samba is running as root but I guess it checks the permissions against
> the user's (non root) permissions. I agree that this is unsecure but the
> files I'm accessing are automatically created on the Linux box with read
> for root only permissions and I don't want to change this.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> Olivier
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
Hello Olivier,
i haven�t tried it, but setting the guest account to root could do it.
I use to telnet from a Win Client for those purposes.
HTH
J. STaehler
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: majordomo problems
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:19:10 +0200
Hi
I'm installing majordomo on a machine. Actually this is my second time, i
succesfully created a mailing list at home on my computer (SuSE 6.1). But
this time i failed on a RedHat. I finished installing, wrapper says that
everything is OK. But when i create lists/test and mail the lists command
to majordomo i get 2 mails back. One from the mailer daemon saying
unknown error 9, and one from majordomo, repeating my command. Majordomo
does only repeat my command, and acts nothing. My /etc/aliases file looks
like:
[...]
majordomo: "|/home/mdom/wrapper majordomo"
owner-majordomo: bufi
majordomo owner: bufi
[...]
The error message is:
554 "|/home/mdom/wrapper majordomo"... unknown mailer error 9
I checked with my home config, but the two are the same. So what do i
need to do if i want majordomo to work on this second machine too?
thanks in advance
Bufi
+---------------------------------+
| Why not go out on a limb? |
| Isn't that where the fruit is?? |
+---------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to find the owner/admin of x.x.x.*?
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 18:05:15 -0700
Hello,
First of all you need to find out who owns those IPs. Run nslookup a.b.c.d.
Then you could use whois database to find out who is administering this
domain.
Where you can find whois database depends on country of the domain (example:
.com domains whois database could be searched via www.networksolutions.com)
Good luck!
System User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am wondering, what is the tool used to display the DNS billing/contact
> information for an ip group, say 100.55.66.1-254?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.. thanks :)
>
> -Jeff
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: "David B. Hostetler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smbclient setup. HELP!
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 18:44:28 -0500
I have Window$ looking at linux fine. How do I get Linux to look at
Window$?
I am running Red Hat 6.0 and M$ Win95B.
My smb.conf is as follows. I have tried to follow the instructions from
RedHat concerning WINS resolution (they want you to enable it) that not
only did not function but the Winbox wanted to lock up when I did that.
;*******************section global*****************
[global]
domain logons = yes
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
browse list = yes
os level = 34
workgroup = HOME
server string = Samba Server
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = True
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = USER
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
dns proxy = no
;*******************section homes*****************
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = True
writable = yes
;*******************section printers*****************
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
guest ok = no
writable = noprintable = yes
What did I goof on?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
