Linux-Networking Digest #102, Volume #12 Wed, 4 Aug 99 02:13:37 EDT
Contents:
RH 6.0 and laptop PCMCIA networking (Devin Baines)
Re: !! HELP !! Sendmail v8.8.7 : Linux RH5.2 POP/SMTP server on an ADSL connex
questions... ("Cowles, Steve")
Where Did IP Alias go in 2.2.6 ?? help me (Erez Pitchon)
Configuring Mail with an @Home connection (Jeff Peterson)
IPChains Help Needed ("Greg")
PPPD registering question ("clint davis")
Re: ipchains in script will not execute (Brian McCauley)
Re: tcpdump has big delays?? (Brian McCauley)
Re: Changing source IP of outgoing UDP packets under RedHat 6.0 . (Brian McCauley)
Re: ipportfw/ADSL problems (Chris)
Re: Loadlin and Ne2k-PCI (Colin Wong)
Clustering w/ Windows Emulation (Dionysus)
Re: help! Network is unreachable (Brian McCauley)
Re: Configuring Mail with an @Home connection (haze)
My server won't wake up! (Charlie)
Re: dhcpcd, RH/Mandrake 6.0, and @home HOORAY (Stephen Bosch)
ACL... (Colin Wong)
Re: tcpdump has big delays?? (Stephen Satchell)
Re: Ethertap device configuration - Writing RAW ethernet packets (Brian McCauley)
Re: routing problem: SIOCDELRT: No such process (Brian McCauley)
Re: Linux vs. Wingate (Colin Wong)
Re: Web Based Linux Management (Girish Kamath)
Syn_cookies.... (Colin Wong)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Devin Baines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,linuc.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: RH 6.0 and laptop PCMCIA networking
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:09:34 GMT
OK,
I installed via the local cdrom on my laptop but now I want to
confiugure networking.
I have a 3Com 3CCE589ET PCOMCIA ethernet card. My prblem is that I do
not know what "device" to choose in order to in voke said device.
I've been through @Home access on my desktop but there it was simple -
eth0
Now I cannot figure it out.
I chose the "everything" choice during install.
Any suggestions?
Devin
------------------------------
From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: !! HELP !! Sendmail v8.8.7 : Linux RH5.2 POP/SMTP server on an ADSL
connex questions...
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:58:20 -0500
You did not mention if you have a registered domain in your post. If you
don't, then there is no way for your system to receive email from the
internet. If you do have a registered domain, do you have the corresponding
MX (mail exchanger) record(s) that points towards your sendmail servers Ip
address your trying to setup?
If you don't have a regeistered domain, the only way I know of to receive
email is to address email as follows:
pcmiller@[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] replace with the external IP address of your
sendmail server
Steve Cowles
SWCowles at gte dot net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> i am attempting to setup a Linux RH5.2 box as a POP/SMTP server on an
> ADSL connection (512k). i set up the box with the default server
> settings, which gave me the default install of Sendmail v8.8.7.
>
> i have made the changes to my sendmail.cw to reflect all the addresses
> i want answered, as well as the /etc/aliases file -- but i still can't
> receive any mail (i can send all i want out to the Internet and it
> will send mail locally from user to user within the machine.
>
> anyone willing to help? TIA
> please respond via email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Erez Pitchon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: demon.ip.support.unix,demon.tech.unix
Subject: Where Did IP Alias go in 2.2.6 ?? help me
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:20:38 GMT
I downloaded in installed slackware 4.0 which had kenel 2.2.6 but
ip_alias.o is nowhere to be found. I don't know how else to config
multiple IPs on a single card.
Thanks in advance should you have a solution.
Erez.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Peterson)
Subject: Configuring Mail with an @Home connection
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 03:45:54 GMT
When configuring a mail server for Linux, do I just configure
Sendmail? Does this program both send and receive email? What does
Fetchmail do?
If I want to receive email from the outside world, do I need a static
IP and a name registered with InterNIC? In the meantime, can my
server just collect the mail from the @Home mail server, or does my
mail program have to collect it directly from @home?
Will QMail do all of this?
At this stage in my Linux learning, I am just trying to figure out how
to send email out from my server to the world, but I would like to
figure out how to receive email via my server.
thanks for any help or direction!
Jeff Peterson
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPChains Help Needed
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:26:02 -0700
I have RedHat 6.0 on which I have set up the ipforwarding / masqerading
using
ipchains. I have loaded the IRC module but I can not DCC anyone from my
windows 95 box which is behind the firewall. I have enabled:
/sbin/ipchains -F forward
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -j MASQ
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
I have loaded the ip_masq_irc.o module.
Still no efect.
The message I get is:
DCC RECV connection attempt to The_Nick failed (err-Connection refused)
Any help will be apprecaited.
Thanks in advance.
Greg.
------------------------------
From: "clint davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPPD registering question
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:03:04 -0700
I have been using pppd ( using ppp-on script) for years.
I just went to Caldera 2.2 and am having a problem.
I can get connected thru ppp0-- no sweat.
Last night, my line went down. Now I have an automated
script that restarts my pppd. Well, the connection would
come up. Heres is what was in the log:
Okay, the line goes down. So, ppp-on runs again. The
messaages show this went but there isan entry that says
ppp1 is registered. When this script fails, ppp-on runs
again and the log shows line registered on ppp2....etc.
While this is all happening, "netsta" shows that ppp0 is
active. Needless to say, no connection.
What are these additional pppx lines and how do I force
my ppp initialization to use ppp0 ( Im using /dev/ttyS1 for
a device)?
Clint
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains in script will not execute
Date: 30 Jul 1999 17:35:17 +0100
marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If a command works by being typed in manually, is there any
> reason that it would not work in a simple script?
A common cause of this is using a editor that uses CRLF (DOS style)
line endings rather than plain LF (Unix style) ones.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: tcpdump has big delays??
Date: 30 Jul 1999 17:39:08 +0100
"Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to debug some network problems on a system that I'm working
> with. I want to set up a sniffer to monitor packets going to and from my
> machine. So I set up another linux box, and connected it to the same
> network. The target machine is 192.168.72.200. So I type:
>
> tcpdump host 192.168.72.200
>
> and then, on other machines, do various things to 72.200; ftp, ping,
> telnet, etc... at first, I thought none of those packets were showing up,
> but that's not quite true - the packets show up on my tcpdump display,
> but they are delayed for long periods of time; up to 10 minutes from
> the time the event occurs until it shows up on the dump. What is going
> on?? Did I somehow enable ip_yawn_delays or something??
Have you tried -n on tcpdump? 10 _minuites_ sounds a bit long for a
DNS llokup to be to blame but it's worth a shot.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Changing source IP of outgoing UDP packets under RedHat 6.0 .
Date: 30 Jul 1999 18:02:04 +0100
"Yuri G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to change the source IP address of outgoing packets (not for all,
> just for certain destination IPs). If someone know which functions in kernel
> source code I need to change to do this, please answer. If you know any
> other way to do this - that would be greate if you tell me.
I'm not familiar with RH.
You can create an IP alais device and route outbound packets for
certain addresses through that.
This used to work even destinations not on the same LAN.
In a later kernel version the routing changed so that you could not
specify both a device and a gateway for the same routing table entry.
This measn this trick is limited to destinations on the same LAN.
You can work-round this limitation by giving your default router an
alias and arranging that packets to one of the addresses use one
virtual interface and those to another use the other.
There's probably another solution using NAT.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: ipportfw/ADSL problems
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:00:59 GMT
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 14:09:27 -0400, "Michael Wheeler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>I've got a RH 5.2 machine that has been running IP masq
>successfully for some time now. I would like to be able to
>ICQ, and thats my problem.
The normal solution for ICQ is to recompile the kernel with the ICQ
masquerading module included. That allows ICQ to work on all of the
clients behind the firewall, and not just on clients mapped through
port-forwarding.
------------------------------
From: Colin Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Loadlin and Ne2k-PCI
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:03:42 GMT
Did you fix the problem yet?
If not, email me and I can help. Your card is RTL8029 chipset? good... I have
those too, and they are working fine.
Colin
Juergen Micka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran into a booting problem with my Reltec Ne2k-PCI card. If I'm executing
> Loadlin on my Win98 to start Linux the kernel detects a wrong io-address and
> irq-line.
> Do I use a bootdisk instead, the kernel detects the PCI card correctly.
> Next I made a linux.par file for Loadlin and tried to set PCI card to the
> settings which Win98 uses ("ether=10,0e400,0,0,eth0"). But it seems to me
> that I can't set pci-cards to specific irqs and io-addresses. Even patching
> the kernel source with the parameters didn't work!
> Unfortunatly the bootdisk solution isn't acceptable, cause we want to remote
> boot the 2 os's.
>
> Does anyone have an idea how to achive this?
> Any suggestions appreciated
>
> Thanks in advance
> Jens
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dionysus)
Subject: Clustering w/ Windows Emulation
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:21:14 GMT
Has anyone considered combining clustering software (whether a full
clustering distribution such as Mosix or a Program such as Beowulf)
with Windows95 Emulation, thus gaining the power of a large cluster of
machines whilest being able to access the huge amount of software
available for the win95 platform? If so, i would be very interested in
hearing of your experiences.
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help! Network is unreachable
Date: 30 Jul 1999 18:06:32 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have the linux machine on my network and I can telnet to it, but
> whenever I try to add the default gateway, it bombs. I get the same
> error message if my netmask is 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.0.0.
>
> I changed the netmask because my ip address is 151.201.19.84 and my
> gateway is 151.201.20.1. So if my gateway is in a different subnet, I
> changed my netmask to help, but it has not.
>
> I included the output of progs arp and route...Any help would be MUCH
> appreciated!
It would be more helpful for you to show us the state _after_ you
corrected the netmask. Obviously with the netmask set too narrow you
are going to get this error.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: haze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Configuring Mail with an @Home connection
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:11:42 GMT
let me know anything you recieve on the subject in the same process
HAZE
Jeff Peterson wrote:
> When configuring a mail server for Linux, do I just configure
> Sendmail?� Does this program both send and receive email?� What does
> Fetchmail do?
>
> If I want to receive email from the outside world, do I need a static
> IP and a name registered with InterNIC?� In the meantime, can my
> server just collect the mail from the @Home mail server, or does my
> mail program have to collect it directly from @home?
>
> Will QMail do all of this?
>
> At this stage in my Linux learning, I am just trying to figure out how
> to send email out from my server to the world, but I would like to
> figure out how to receive email via my server.
>
> thanks for any help or direction!
>
> Jeff Peterson
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie)
Subject: My server won't wake up!
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 01:24:39 -0500
Okay... my RH6 server runs fine if it's connected to remotely at least
once an hour or so, however if it becomes idle for more than an hour or
two it goes into this bizarre mode where it will not wake up when it is
asked for something (be it a ping, ftp, http, mail, or telnet.) It's not
just how long I am waiting... netscape will time out, so will ftp and
telnet, and if I try again it still won't respond.
If I wait long enough (like 4 hours) it will suddenly wake up and be
fine... another way I can wake it up is log onto the local terminal and
THEN use netscape, ftp, or telenet, and the server wakes up everyone can
connect and everything is spiffy-keen.
The server is using a fixed IP so it's not a DHCP problem as some peoble
have told me. This problem has been going on for quite a while now (like
4 weeks) and has lasted through several fresh installs of RH6.
If anyone can give any insight into what might be the problem, PLEASE let
me know!
Thanks!
Charlie
------------------------------
From: Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: dhcpcd, RH/Mandrake 6.0, and @home HOORAY
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:31:56 GMT
Stephen Bosch wrote:
> Hello, everyone:
>
> Well, I think it's safe to ask for help now. I've spent days beating
> bushes, reading documentation and looking through Usenet archives. I've
> even spoken with my local guru, but he uses static IP and didn't have
> much that he could offer me that I hadn't already tried.
HOORAY!
I am writing this to you in Netscape Messenger from Linux. I can't tell you
how fantastic this feels.
It seems that the confusion stemmed from the fact that I had many things go
wrong at once. It is tough to get DHCP working when the OS can't even see
your card. I made many changes to the configuration and abandoned those
changes when they didn't work. Of course, my ethernet card wasn't up then.
It is now.
Many thanks to Jason Brossa for his (as it ultimately turned out!) helpful
primer on setting up Red Hat 6.0 with @home. The changes to the ifup script
were what ultimately solved my problem. Down with pump!
So -- in order now: get card working FIRST, then configure IP. If you don't
notice that your card is not working until after you have attempted a bunch
of IP configuration, remember to repeat those steps AFTER the card works.
Seems obvious, but in the heat of combat things can get mighty confusing
mighty quickly.
Thanks for all your help!
-Stephen-
------------------------------
From: Colin Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ACL...
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:27:02 GMT
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if they have successfully used SAMBA 2.0.4 on a PDC
(primary domain controller) so that NT machines can modify the ACL list,
as well as sharing permissions and security permissions?
Thanks in advance,
Colin
------------------------------
Subject: Re: tcpdump has big delays??
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Satchell)
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:11:54 GMT
In addition to the -n option, also specify the -l option if you want to
see the data in real time. This sets up stdout in line-buffered modem
instead of fully-buffered mode.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian McCauley) wrote in <u9aeseks7n.fsf@wcl
-l.bham.ac.uk>:
>"Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm trying to debug some network problems on a system that I'm working
>> with. I want to set up a sniffer to monitor packets going to and from
>> my machine. So I set up another linux box, and connected it to the
>> same network. The target machine is 192.168.72.200. So I type:
>>
>> tcpdump host 192.168.72.200
>>
>>[snip] What is going on?? Did I somehow enable ip_yawn_delays or
>>something??
>
>Have you tried -n on tcpdump? 10 _minuites_ sounds a bit long for a
>DNS llokup to be to blame but it's worth a shot.
>
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethertap device configuration - Writing RAW ethernet packets
Date: 30 Jul 1999 17:32:51 +0100
"opteam4" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently programming an ethernet bridg as a daemon. I know
> there is an ethernet bridge solution in the kernel (and tried it, it
> worked fine.) But I need to nanlyzes the packet incoming and
> outgoing on each ethernet segment. I started to write a program
> using SOCK_PACKET , in PROMISCUOUS mode, but I was only able to read
> packets from eth0 and eth1 but not writing ther ethernet packet back
> to eth0 and eth1
Could you be more precise?
> I looked so at the tap* devices. I configured my kernel easily:
> netlink_dev and ethertap support as modules
> then inserting them with
I think you misunderstood what ethertap does. Ethertap devices do not
provide a means to write raw packets out to a physical LAN.
Ethertap devices provide a means for userspace programs to write raw
packets _to_the_kernel_ so that the kernel will behave as though they
were incomming packets.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing problem: SIOCDELRT: No such process
Date: 30 Jul 1999 17:46:11 +0100
Wolfgang Scherer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am using SuSE 6.1 and I have set up lo, eth0 and ippp0.
> route -n shows:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 194.224.200.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ippp0
> 192.168.222.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
^^^^^^^^^
This is right.
>
> Everything seems to be ok, but on shutdown I receive the following
> error:
>
> Shutting down routing
> Error while executing
> /sbin/route del -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev lo
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is wrong.
> SIOCDELRT: No such process
> Shutting down routing failed
Anyhow SuSE 6.1 has a 2.2 series kernel doesn't it?
I that case your startup shutdown scripts should not be explicitly
adding/removing inferface routes with "route" - they are automagically
handled by "ifconfig".
> What's the problem?
Probably got 127.0.0.1 in /etc/route.conf.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Colin Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux vs. Wingate
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:07:00 GMT
Hello
If you are not planning to expand beyond 5 computers, wingate is much
faster.... at least it was for me.... considering my Linux machine is a
486!!
Wingate is simple to manage, whereas Linux can get hairy if you don't know
what you
are doing..
Want more info from me? Email me
Colin
Dusko Nikolic wrote:
> In my company we have 5 computers with NT Workstation 4 operating
> system connected in to peer to peer network. One of them has modem. We
> installed Wingate on that machine so that other can share internet
> (www, email, news, ftp) access.
>
> I suppose that same thing can be achieved by purchasing another
> computer on which we will install linux so that machine can play role
> of server.
>
> By doing that, what kind of improvements we can expect regarding
> security and performance issues?
>
> I
------------------------------
From: Girish Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Web Based Linux Management
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:30:37 GMT
Hi
I use Webmin.
It's quite helpful.
For more details visit
www.webmin.com
Even Perl is very strong. But I prefer Webmin.
-Regards,
Girish Kamath.
Karl McMurdo wrote:
>
> Is there such an animal ?
>
> Unixware has their 'Webtop' interface that allows system management with
a
> web interface, and Samba has it as well, I'm looking for the ability to
> manage a linux server from a remote browser (or even a local browser
> although that makes less sense as you are in X and presumably X
management
> tools are available) I have a number of application servers that do not
> have X installed, and a couple that do, my 'desktop' machine is actually
a
> laptop running WinNT, and I run a windows X-Server to connect to those
> machines with X running, and telnet into the others to do sysadmin tasks.
I
> have been experimenting with perl and have created a script to do the
most
> common task (add/mod/del users) with a web interface, and am thinking of
> expanding it to cover more tasks, but don't want to reinvent the wheel.
> Any feedback would be appreciated.
>
> Karl McMurdo
>
>
>
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Colin Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Syn_cookies....
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:23:16 GMT
Hello,
Is anyone out there running a 2.0.x kernel? (preferrably 2.0.34
Slackware release)
If so, can you tell me how to use syn_cookies? I already recompiled the
kernel with syn_cookies support, but it doesn't show up in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4
Anyone know why?
Colin
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
