Linux-Networking Digest #105, Volume #12 Wed, 4 Aug 99 10:13:35 EDT
Contents:
It is Linux stupid! ("John N")
Re: Linux Printing to a Remote Printer (Alexander Atkin)
Switch to ProFTPD, root dirs? (Drew)
Re: Engineer (Monte Phillips)
Re: IPChains Help Needed (Monte Phillips)
Re: Linux vs. Wingate (Monte Phillips)
Re: win95->linux routing (Monte Phillips)
linuxconf ("Rob")
Re: 486 to linux box? (Markus)
2.0.x IP Forwarding bug? (Geoff Short)
Re: Probably an easy gateway problem. ("Zaphod Beeblebrox")
DHCPD on a multi-homed router ("Zaphod Beeblebrox")
RedHat 6.0, Can't FTP into server ("Matthew J. Hellman")
Re: ncpmount permissions? (Raymond Doetjes)
Re: Help with RH6 & Routing Problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Modem hangup during PPP connect in RedHat 6.0 (Kelly A Sigmon)
Re: DHCP problems with REDHAT ("Zaphod Beeblebrox")
Update: RedHat 6.0, Can't FTP into server ("Matthew J. Hellman")
Can't read files ("Olivier Pidoux")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "John N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: It is Linux stupid!
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 07:56:06 -0400
Hello everybody,
I've installed RH5.2 with all the trimmings, but there only one problem.
I still cannot make my network component work.
Even though I've mouth-to-mouth resucitation, aspirin, and some other stuff,
I can not revive the dead ...
This looks to me like the Blair Witch Project ... and I'm shaking ...
The problem is this.
I've downloaded Donald Becker's rtl8391 source code for my SMC1211tx nic,
but since I'm a DOS/Windows-in-transition-to-a-better-world kind of guy, I'm
stuck with with the source, cannot compile, finaly I do not know how to
attach the final .o file to the kernel.
Help please, before I commit harakiri with a razor blade.
John Nunez <:)
P.S. Still loving Linux ... :)
------------------------------
From: Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Printing to a Remote Printer
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 13:03:09 +0100
I have done this but it just waits for the Printer Queue to become active
on the printer server. I thought it WAS active as it works through Samba
and on the printer server itself.
Any suggestions?
Alex.
Gustin Kiffney wrote:
> Cut from metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/Printing-HOWTO:
> edit your /etc/printcap and tell it the name of the remote
> machine the printer is on ('rm' for remote machine)
> e.g.:
> lp|dj|deskjet:\
> :sd=/var/spool/lpd/dj:\
> :rm=machine.out.there.com:\
> :rp=printername:\
> :lp=/dev/null:\
> :sh:
> But don't just use this example - read the relevant sections
> of the HOWTO and it will become crystal clear.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am having trouble getting Linux to print to a remote printer.
> > The remote printer is also on Linux with Aps Filter and Ghostscript.
> > Both machines are running Slackware 4.0.
> >
> > Please start from the basics because I know nothing about Linux
> > printing.
> >
> > Thanks, Alex.
> >
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Switch to ProFTPD, root dirs?
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:15:09 -0800
Hey all,
After many e-mail suggestions, I made the swtich to ProFTPD,
and I must say I am very impressed, I only have two minute
configuration issues:
1. How to reset the anonymous root directory?
2. How to set the guestgroup root directory?
As you can tell these are easy questions to shoot down,
and I have already looked at proftpd.org, and read the man
pages. I am not even sure if PROftpd even uses ftpaccess,
its a little different than Bero. I assume it reads
proftpd.conf but I havent figured out much on how to set
up root dirs.
Thanks Much,
Drew
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Engineer
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:18:17 GMT
Get yourself four old computers, put a different OS on each of them.
Make one a linux server and network susch that each has full access to
files and printers etc. On the linux machine set up Apache as an
intranet http server, also mail and news utilizing maximum security
methods.( wouldn't hurt to set up remote access). Set up for internet
access thru the linux server for all clients. Institute full
synchronized encryption passwording and time synchonizing.
Then, in the second hour teach, yourself scripting in one or two
shells and Perl and/or Python.
g'luk
"Romiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am a Microsoft Engineer and am sick of it, I have worked with Linux and
>awk programming fpr two months know, how can I get to a high level in Linux
>Engineering QUICKLY as I learn fast?
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: IPChains Help Needed
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:42:47 GMT
If you are accessing the net via a modem you will need to point
ipchains to it.
ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
"Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have RedHat 6.0 on which I have set up the ipforwarding / masqerading
>using
>ipchains. I have loaded the IRC module but I can not DCC anyone from my
>windows 95 box which is behind the firewall. I have enabled:
>
>/sbin/ipchains -F forward
>/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
>/sbin/ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -j MASQ
>echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
>I have loaded the ip_masq_irc.o module.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Linux vs. Wingate
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:50:27 GMT
The REAL question, of course, is: Do you want stability. Wingate,
Sysgate etc all are dependent upon windows, hence when windows goes
gen'l fault error on you, or simply freezes, guess what so does your
network. As for Colins remark that Wingate was faster that simply
isn't true. As he mentioned he put linux on a 486 and ran the
network, he certainly didn't run Wingate on that machine and run a
network.
As for linux being 'hairy', thats bs. It si only as hairy as you
want it to be. You can have a linux server (once linux is loaded) and
a windows group samba'd and running smoothly in a short afternoon.
There are several sites with step by step instructions for networking
linux<->WinX
g'Luk
Colin Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello
>If you are not planning to expand beyond 5 computers, wingate is much
>faster.... at least it was for me.... considering my Linux machine is a
>486!!
>
>Wingate is simple to manage, whereas Linux can get hairy if you don't know
>what you
>are doing..
>Colin
>Dusko Nikolic wrote:
>> In my company we have 5 computers with NT Workstation 4 operating
>> system connected in to peer to peer network. One of them has modem. We
>> installed Wingate on that machine so that other can share internet
>> (www, email, news, ftp) access.
>>
>> I suppose that same thing can be achieved by purchasing another
>> computer on which we will install linux so that machine can play role
>> of server.
>>
>> By doing that, what kind of improvements we can expect regarding
>> security and performance issues?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: win95->linux routing
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:53:15 GMT
Both of you need to go :
This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
and this one as well
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
networked.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Will Stockdell wrote:
>> I'm trying to get my spouse's Win95 box talking to my Linux box. Each
>> box has an ethernet card and modem. The Linux box is fine. I can ping
>> the ethernet card in the Win95 box OK. The problem is that the Win95
>> box refuses to talk to anything but its modem. Sometimes running ping
>> will even bring up the internet dialer for the net connection.
>>
>I have found that this is a problem too. In my case clicking on 'cancel'
>on the modem dialler then causes the connection to work via local
>network (with ping/ftp/telnet etc).
>
>If you have problem with 'ping' using machine names then it should
>always work with IP addresses. You can set up a 'hosts' file on the
>windows machine. There is a sample file C:\WINDOWS\HOSTS.SAM which needs
>editing and renaming to C:\WINDOWS\HOSTS Of course you have to reboot
>before the changes take effect but you expected that didn't you ;-) It
>is also a direct lift of a unix /etc/hosts file which brings to mind the
>comment about those that don't understand unix are condemned to re
>invent it poorly.
>On my home network I have found that if the Linux machine is running
>samba the host names resolve without this 'hosts' file and that pesky
>network neighborhood thing works as well and as long as you have a Linux
>user the same as the Windows user you can see your home directory on the
>Linux box.
>Phil Q
------------------------------
From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (X=y)>
Subject: linuxconf
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:14:36 +0200
Hi, I was wondering why linuxconf is listening on port 98 ? According to
netstat -a.
There is also a rc script for linuxconf. When renaming that to Kxxlinuxconf
it still starts
at boot up.
Thx,
Rob
------------------------------
From: Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 486 to linux box?
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 14:28:45 +0200
Not sure if somebody will read this...but I read NET-3-HOWTO, however, I
feel like I need a little more basic help...
I have 1 3Com NIC in the 486 and 2 in my pentium. I also have the RJ45
cable in between, so it seems like I have all hw I need to get the two
computers to interwork. But now is where my bother begins. What are the
apps that I need to allow the 486 (win 3.11) to browse the net using the
pentium as the provider of the information from the net?
Cheers,
Markus
Gerhard Schwarzer wrote:
>
> You will need a second NIC for the Pentium.
> Maybe you try a crossed RJ45 cable to connect.(works only with two pcs)
> Then things as you like firewall,smb,proxy etc. on the Pentium
>
> B
>
> Markus schrieb:
> >
> > I am wondering what is the easiest way to connect an old 486 (33MHz)
> > running windows 3.1 to a pentium pc running Redhat 6.0 so that I will be
> > able to browse the internet on the 486 using the pentium as the gateway
> > to the net. I still want to be able to browse the internet with the
> > pentium. My pentium has a catv connection to the net.
> > Is there some cable that I can connect the 2 pcs by, and then some free
> > software?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Markus
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoff Short)
Subject: 2.0.x IP Forwarding bug?
Date: 4 Aug 1999 12:27:56 GMT
I have a machine(*) which forwards traffic onto a subnet, from another
network with a vivid router on the other end. Most of the time it
works perfectly. Very occasionally (every month or so) the vivid
stops sending packets, investigation last time showed that the vivid
had assigned the mac address of my forwarding machine with the ip no.
of one of the subnetted machines.
So, is my linux machine forwarding packets without setting the ip
correctly? I've found no reference to such a bug on the web/usenet.
All ideas welcome.
Geoff
* Machine is 486, running 2.0.3x kernel. IP forwarding on, no firewalling
or masquerading options. Original problem was with 2.0.34 but upgrade
to 2.0.37 doesn't seem to have helped. Network cards are both wd80x3.
--
============================================================================
Ever sit and watch ants? They're always busy with Geoff Short
something, never stop for a moment. I just [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can't identify with that kind of work ethic. http://kipper.york.ac.uk/~geoff
------------------------------
From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <ps [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Probably an easy gateway problem.
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 05:33:46 -0700
When you say you can ping the router do you mean the local interface or the
one on the border? Try pinging each interface going out. Then try ping a
known ip/name on the net. Can only assume your router is set up correctly.
afonso tavares wrote in message <01bedd97$1fa59ca0$493df6c2@xlbent73>...
>I have a PC running Linux and I want to access Internet thru a router
>configured as a gateway.
>I can ping the router and I configured my PC default gateway to the router
>IP but when I try to browse with Lynx Web Browser or access an Ftp site I
>get a 'can't make connection' kind message.
>
>Can anyone help ?
>Thanks.
>Afonso Tavares
------------------------------
From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <ps [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCPD on a multi-homed router
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 05:29:26 -0700
I config'd a RH 5.1 box as a router with 3C509's and it's working just fine.
However, I wanted to set up DHCP with my dhcpd.conf having both subnets
listed in the scope. This seem to work fine, when I run dhcpd a message
displays that it's Listening and sending on both interfaces. The problem is
that only one subnet is able to offer leases.
The primary interface is 192.168.1.0 and the secondary is 192.168.2.0.
pretty standard. I call the 192.168.1.0 the primary because it was the only
active interface when the machine first booted up and bfore I did the
ifconfig to make the secondary active. It also happens to be the one that is
offering leases.
I did compile the kernel to be a firewall, everthough that's not it's
current role. I don't have any ipfwadm policies in place. i do have a few
service ports rem'd out in the inet.conf.
Any ideas? Can dhcp work on both interfaces on a multihomed box? What about
the defaultrouter. What should it be set to?
Thanx...
------------------------------
From: "Matthew J. Hellman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 6.0, Can't FTP into server
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 08:14:27 -0500
I just setup a Linux box and only a have a couple of problems;)
They may be related. My biggest problem is that I can't FTP into the
server. FTP is being loaded in inetd.conf. hosts.allow and hosts.deny
are both empty. I can connect but the server closes the connection
almost immediately. Hmmm...I think I just figured it out. There is no
in.ftpd file in /usr/bin. Damn, I suppose that means I just need to
install an FTP program? Also, when I telnet into the Linux box from
another machine on the same network, it takes an extremely long time to
get the login prompt.
TIA,
Matt
------------------------------
From: Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ncpmount permissions?
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 13:47:30 +0200
Your group is probably still root. You should change that to users.
The users that don't reside in a group connot make use of the suid. (Thank
god)
Raymond
"G. Pollack" wrote:
> Is it possible for a non-root user to mount a novell server? I've made
> ncpmount suid root, and the permissions on the mount point are 777, yet
> when I attempt to mount the server while non-root I get "operation not
> permitted". Is there something analogous to the 'user' option for mount?
> An entry to made into fstab?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Gerald Pollack
> Dept. of Biology, McGill University
--
=====================
Why use Windows
When
Real Men
Have Invented Doors?
=====================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with RH6 & Routing Problem
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 13:10:31 GMT
Do you have your IP Masqarading setup? And what version of the kernal
are you using. I know that I have to use ipchains to set up my firewall
on my linux box. Also is your firewall setup to denie all packets to
the one ip address 203.38.93.181. It might be in one of the rules you
set up for it.
In article <newscache$myiwff$5k2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Shane Chrisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to setup a firewall using RH6 and I am running into a
problem
> where the IP Forwarding is getting to the external ethernet card but
then
> not being forwarded by the card to the router. My network is as
follows.
>
> Router 203.38.93.181 - 255.255.255.252
> |
> |
> Linux external eth0 203.38.93.182 - 255.255.255.252
> |
> |
> Linux Internal eth1 203.38.98.194 - 255.255.255.192
> |
> All other hosts on this same segment
>
> My problem is that when i set the routing up in RH6 i can ping from
say
> 203.38.98.195 to 203.38.93.182 but not to 203.38.93.181. The linux
box does
> not appear to be forwarding the request to the router. The routing
tables
> are setup correctly as i confirmed them by temporarily placing an NT
box
> where the linux box is and configuring the routing and IP Forwarding.
It all
> workied well. But with the RH6 box with IP forwarding enabled and
running
> routed i am unable to get it working.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance, and feel free to email your responses.
>
> --
> Shane Chrisp
> 2000 Computers & Networks
> http://www.2000cn.com.au
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph. 0412 409 856
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Kelly A Sigmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Modem hangup during PPP connect in RedHat 6.0
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:17:50 -0400
Thanks for trying to help.
"W.G. Unruh" wrote:
>
> Try axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
Didn't help.
> The connection is never actually established. I think that you might have been led
> up the garden path by the login. It may be that ATT uses CHAP and does not
> want you to log in ( and when you do leaves you in limbo)
> Anyway that document will show you how to figure out what they want, and how
> to debug your connection.
Possible. I've read some other posts from people using AT&T and tried
their method.
> You do not show us your chat file so we do not know how it corresponds to what
> is actually sent.
> You also do not seem to have the debug option for pppd set (or you have not setup
> syslog.conf )
I've specified the -d as a PPP option (I'm using netcfg) as well as
placed "debug" in the /etc/ppp/options file. Is there anything else I
need to do?
Here's a better /var/log/messages listing with the timing info. I do see
some delay when the modem dials. Is this typical?
Aug 4 04:57:40 localhost pppd[744]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
Aug 4 04:57:40 localhost ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/modem
at 115200
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: abort on (BUSY)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: abort on (ERROR)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: abort on (Invalid Login)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: abort on (Login incorrect)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: send (ATZ^M)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: expect (OK)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: ATZ^M^M
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: OK
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: -- got it
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: send (ATDT###-####^M)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: expect (CONNECT)
Aug 4 04:57:41 localhost chat[746]: ^M
Aug 4 04:57:55 localhost chat[746]: ATDT###-####^M^M
Aug 4 04:57:55 localhost chat[746]: CONNECT
Aug 4 04:57:55 localhost chat[746]: -- got it
Aug 4 04:57:55 localhost chat[746]: send (^M)
Aug 4 04:57:55 localhost chat[746]: expect (on:)
Aug 4 04:57:55 localhost chat[746]: 28800/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS^M
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: ^H^M^M
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: STATION ID - <station id>^M^M
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: ^M^M
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: Welcome ^M^M
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: Please Sign-on:
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: -- got it
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: send (<my login id>^M)
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: timeout set to 5 seconds
Aug 4 04:57:56 localhost chat[746]: expect (~)
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost chat[746]: <my login id>^M
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost chat[746]: ~
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost chat[746]: -- got it
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost chat[746]: send (^M)
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost pppd[744]: Serial connection established.
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost pppd[744]: Using interface ppp0
Aug 4 04:57:57 localhost pppd[744]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Aug 4 04:58:01 localhost pppd[744]: Modem hangup
Aug 4 04:58:01 localhost pppd[744]: Connection terminated.
Aug 4 04:58:01 localhost pppd[744]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
Aug 4 04:58:02 localhost pppd[744]: Exit.
------------------------------
From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <ps [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP problems with REDHAT
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 05:41:05 -0700
Are you getting the Listening on Socket and Sending on socket message when
you run dhcpd? Did you create a dhcpd.leases file in /etc? ex., touch
/etc/dhcpd.leases - that's it. I'm sure you've checked these things, but
your post doesn't say.
Bradford Hamilton wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I had a similar problem - turned out that the NIC card on win95 was set to
>address 0x210, instead of the "normal" 0x300.
>
>This may not be the answer to your issue, but double-check the IRQ/address.
>
>Brad Hamilton
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Andrew H. George wrote:
>
>> hi, i was totally unable to get dhcpcd to work with a previous
>> installation.
>> so, i did a clean install of Red Hat 6.0
>> when i try to run dhcpcd, it pauses for a while and times out
>> the actually error message in /var/log/dhcpcd.log:
>>
>> Aug 1 11:04:18 localhost dhcpcd[577]: timed out waiting for a valid DHCP
>> server response
>>
>> the connections works perfectly in win95, so i know it's "alive".
>> alarmingly, i can't get an IP even when i boot off of the boot/rook
>> disks and try to do a Red Hat ftp/install. it says that it can't get a
>> valid response.
>>
>> when i try to run "ifup eth0" it says that it is detering the IP
>> address and then outputs
>> "Operation Failed". i can't seem to get this working.. the ethernet
>> card works fine, i used to have it on an ethernet network -- which is
>> why i did a total clean install. i thought that previous ethernet
>> configurations maybe interfering, but that's not the case.
>>
>> i'm using RoadRunner in Fairfax, VA --- many other people have been able
>> to get it working, especially "out of the box". do you have any
>> suggestions?
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Andrew George
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Matthew J. Hellman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Update: RedHat 6.0, Can't FTP into server
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 08:23:56 -0500
Ok, installed wuftp and in the process in.ftpd was created --at least I
think that's what did it;)
Anyway, FTP has the same problem as telnet, it takes an extremely long
time for the server to respond or present the login. What could cause
something like that?
Thanks again,
Matt
"Matthew J. Hellman" wrote:
>
> I just setup a Linux box and only a have a couple of problems;)
> They may be related. My biggest problem is that I can't FTP into the
> server. FTP is being loaded in inetd.conf. hosts.allow and hosts.deny
> are both empty. I can connect but the server closes the connection
> almost immediately. Hmmm...I think I just figured it out. There is no
> in.ftpd file in /usr/bin. Damn, I suppose that means I just need to
> install an FTP program? Also, when I telnet into the Linux box from
> another machine on the same network, it takes an extremely long time to
> get the login prompt.
> TIA,
> Matt
------------------------------
From: "Olivier Pidoux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't read files
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:27:36 -0400
Hi,
I downloaded a files for Linux with my NT computer, but my Linux system
can't read the file. What can I do?? My Linux does't have acces to the
internet
Thanks
Olivier
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
