Linux-Networking Digest #140, Volume #12 Sat, 7 Aug 99 05:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: ipchains on Caldera 2.2 will not work ("Eugene")
Re: NFS traffic monitor for Linux ("Eugene")
Re: Delaying eth0 initialization? (Leon Harris)
Rh 5.2 telnet won't work (Rick)
Trafic Shaper woes... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Problems sending mail to my server using @home (geoff)
Re: proftpd Q ("Mike")
Need help with setting-up local ethernet (Richard Kr.)
Re: Telnet Problem ("Mike")
Re: Intel EEPro/10 ("bgchgfg")
Re: IP Masquerading with IP Address and Mac Address Restrictions ("B. T.")
Setting up a PPP connection (Chad Wesley Armstrong)
Three ethernet cards, one not found (Greg Leblanc)
help: booting a computer with bootp/dhcpd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Recommend a good cheap 10/100 card? ("Andrew Taylor")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains on Caldera 2.2 will not work
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 05:50:41 GMT
You need to enable IP masquerading when you compile the kernel.
Harry DePoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:nBGq3.69$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is a stumper...I installed COL2.2 on a IBM netfinity server to use
as
> a file server/firewall-gateway to the internet. I have a working DSL
> connection, but I cannot get ipchains to work with COL 2.2. I have
followed
> the howto's, recompiled the kernel, checked for ipchains being installed
and
> still it will not work. The error message "ipchains: Protocol not
available"
> comes up after I run rc.firewall. When I type this: ipchains -List, I get
> this: "ipchains: Incompatible with this kernel" this has 2.2.5 kernel
> installed. I turned on the firewall in the make menuconfig, still no
> ipchains. What else can I try ?
>
> Jake
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS traffic monitor for Linux
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 06:07:44 GMT
I don't know what in particular you want to monitor, but there is a tool
called iptraf, which which can monitor any IP packets passing through the
network interfaces
hope that helps
Eugene
Walter F.J. Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi folks,
>
> we lately had a couple of hard to trace and explain
> response problems with NFS under Linux. We are using
> a 2.0.x kernel and NFSv2.
>
> Sorry for the stupid question, but I wonder whether
> there is a decent
>
> NFS traffic monitoring
>
> tool available. I'd love to know what the NFS throughput
> of a server actually is, and the names of the clients
> causing the traffic.
>
> Cheers, Walter
>
> --
> Walter F.J. Mueller Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GSI, Abteilung KP3 Phone: +49-6159-71-2766
> D-64291 Darmstadt FAX: +49-6159-71-2989
> WWW: http://www-kp3.gsi.de/www/kp3/people/mueller.html
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 01:44:12 +0800
From: Leon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Delaying eth0 initialization?
Your symptoms sound as if the card is in pnp mode.
Are you sure it didn't get accidently put into this mode (eg, did you
ever initialise the card under win 98).
Also, do a lsmod and see if the 3c509 driver is in the kernel.
Is it the only nic in your machine?
Do an ifconfig eth0 and see if it all looks ok. ( Sometimes when
ifconfig only shows lo, asking it for the specific details can give you
more, or atleast I seem to remember that it did).
------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Rh 5.2 telnet won't work
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 15:47:28 +1000
Hi,
This problem has not worried me before but now I need to use it, I have
setup rh 5.2 using default ( everything ) I cant telnet anywhere, all it
says is ` unable to connect to host localhost access denied ` its
probably
easy but I cant work out how to enable it ! driving me nuts.
TIA Rick.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Trafic Shaper woes...
Date: 3 Aug 1999 12:28:19 -0700
Friends,
I have run into some problems with implementing Trafic Shaper on my Linux 2.2.10
box and am hoping someone could give me a pointer.
Basically I am able to attach a shaper device to my interface eth0 but when I
try to do the same with interface eth1 it gives me the error,
shaper: No such device
which is incorrect because I am using that very same device to telnet in.
Second question (a little more complicated)
I would like to control Internet access for a client at 64Kbps. I thought about
using 2 shaper devices (until I hit the problem above) but it occured to me that
this might not be possible. If a shaper device can only control outgoing packets
and on each device (eth0 and eth1) of my multihomed Linux router I have a shaper
limiting transmission at 64Kbps, the client can get effective throughput of
128Kbps since he could transmit and receive at 64Kbps in each direction.
Is there any way to control aggregate bandwidth (sum of incomming and outgoing
traffic) other than connecting two boxes with, for ex., a null modem cable?
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!!
Regards,
Alex Panagides
Ceara, Brazil
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (geoff)
Subject: Re: Problems sending mail to my server using @home
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 07:00:54 GMT
Could it be that you don't have an MX record for your domain that points to your
mail server?
[god@box rules]$ dig mx auroral.co.home.com
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> mx cc49696-a.aurora1.co.home.com
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; cc49696-a.aurora1.co.home.com, type = MX, class = IN
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
co.home.com. 1D IN SOA nocns.home.net. hostmaster.home.net. (
2992171010 ; serial
1H ; refresh
10M ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
;; Total query time: 24 msec
;; FROM: www.nodecaf.com to SERVER: default -- 24.3.0.33
;; WHEN: Sat Aug 7 02:59:15 1999
;; MSG SIZE sent: 47 rcvd: 119
Mine is ....
[god@box rules]$ dig mx www.nodecaf.com
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> mx www.nodecaf.com
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 4
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; www.nodecaf.com, type = MX, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.nodecaf.com. 55m46s IN MX 10 mail.myinternet.com.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
nodecaf.com. 55m46s IN NS ns1.mydomain.com.
nodecaf.com. 55m46s IN NS ns2.mydomain.com.
nodecaf.com. 55m46s IN NS ns3.mydomain.com.
nodecaf.com. 55m46s IN NS ns4.mydomain.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.mydomain.com. 1d14h47m11s IN A 209.153.199.2
ns2.mydomain.com. 1d14h47m11s IN A 209.153.199.3
ns3.mydomain.com. 1d14h47m11s IN A 209.153.199.4
ns4.mydomain.com. 1d14h47m11s IN A 209.153.199.5
;; Total query time: 39 msec
;; FROM: www.nodecaf.com to SERVER: default -- 24.3.0.33
;; WHEN: Sat Aug 7 03:00:17 1999
;; MSG SIZE sent: 33 rcvd: 221
On Sat, 07 Aug 1999 01:48:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Peterson)
wrote:
>I am having problems in sending email to my RH6 machine from an
>outside source such as Hotmail or my work computer. I have no problem
>sending email out from the box, or remotely retrieving my mail via
>POP. I currently have an account with @home and a curently stable IP.
>
>In test #1, I can send email by using an IP address with no problem.
>When viewing the email, I noticed that my host name was cutoff from
>the address.
>
>In test #2, the Hotmail server could not find that abbreviated
>address. I understand why this does not work, but thought I would try
>it.
>
>In test #3, I tried sending mail using the full name, but that was
>bounced back also.
>
>In the test #4, I sent this email out while I was actually sitting in
>Linux. It looks as this makes it.
>
>In final test #5, it seems my computer sees the mail, but refused it
>for some reason?? Any ideas??
>cheeser.penguinpowered.com works fine when going to my site via http.
>
>THANKS for any assistance or direction one can provide.
>
>-------------
>-------------
>-------------
>
>1) Test email to "jeff@[24.8.23.36]"
>--------------
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>2) Test to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>--------------
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Sorry, I couldn't find any host named aurora1.co.home.com. (#5.1.2)
>
>3) Test to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>---------------
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
>addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't
>work out.
>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Sorry, I couldn't find any host named cc49696-a.aurora1.co.home.com.
>(#5.1.2)
>
>4) Test to my JustLinux dynamic address
> " [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>------------------
>----- Transcript of session follows -----
>553 cheeser.penguinpowered.com. config error: mail loops back to me
>(MX problem?)
>554 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Local configuration error
>
>
>5)
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>24.8.23.36 does not like recipient.
>Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying
>denied Giving up on 24.8.23.36.
geoff
--
Who is this Unix guy anyway?
------------------------------
From: "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: proftpd Q
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 02:11:15 -0500
Do you have shadow passwords installed? If so you have to compile it with
shadow support. ./configure --help
Mike
max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> How on earth do you configure ProFTPD to allow users (with a home
> directory) to log on with their username and password?
>
> I've tried most everything by now, and everything I did in the
> configuration file just killed my anonymous access, but gave nothing in
> return.
>
> I just want them to be able to connect to my machine with their username
> and password, and automatically take them to their home dir.
>
> Manfred
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kr.)
Subject: Need help with setting-up local ethernet
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 07:57:18 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
I'm trying to setup Win98 - RedHat52 local ethernet,
the physical connection seems to work fine, but i'm
not able to ping any computers (i'm getting 100%
packets lost). I added the route (route add -net
192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0) and confi-
gured network interface (ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.2
netmask 255.255.255.0 up), also i recompiled kernel
to support my ethernet card (NETGEAR FA310TX with
tulip driver). All IPs and netmask are set properly
too.
Any suggestions what do i do wrong ?
Thanks in advance, Richard Kr.
------------------------------
From: "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet Problem
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 02:13:29 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
=======_NextPart_000_016B_01BEE07A.70C4A500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Edit your resolv.conf in /etc to have 'nameserver IPOFNAMESERVERHERE' or =
man resolv.conf for more information.
Mike
Venantius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message =
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
There was someone who wanted to know what was the result of issuing =
'nslookup' command on my Linux box. Well here it is:=20
#nslookup 20.0.0.2=20
*** Can't find server name for address 20.0.0.1: No response from =
server=20
*** Default servers are not available=20
Incidently IP 20.0.0.1 belongs to the server that I am working on.=20
=20
Any suggestion on solving the problem?=20
=20
=20
regards,=20
Venantius.=20
=20
=20
> Hi,=20
> I have setup a small networking in my house. It consists of 4 PCs. =
3=20
> win95 PCs and one is a Linux box. The Linux box acts as a file =
server=20
> (running Samba). Now all my machines can ftp and ping the Linux box =
and=20
> vice versa. But when it come to telnet, one of my win95 PC does not =
> connect - or rather it get stuck half war. When I telnet from this=20
> particular machine, I get the first two greeting lines but never the =
> login prompt. All my other machines are fine.=20
>=20
> I probed further and found that this problem only persists for =
certain=20
> IP address. The following addresses have been assigned to the =
machines:=20
>=20
> Linux box =3D 20.0.0.1=20
> win95-1 =3D 20.0.0.2=20
> win95-2 =3D 20.0.0.3=20
> win95-3 =3D 20.0.0.4=20
>=20
> No the strange thing is that only win95-2 (which has the IP =
20.0.0.3)=20
> has this problem. Can anyone help on this? I have posted this =
before=20
> but the problem has not been solved yet.=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
=======_NextPart_000_016B_01BEE07A.70C4A500
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Edit your resolv.conf in /etc to have =
'nameserver=20
IPOFNAMESERVERHERE' or man resolv.conf for more =
information.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mike</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>Venantius <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]=
ring.my</A>...</DIV>There=20
was someone who wanted to know what was the result of issuing =
'nslookup'=20
command on my Linux box. Well here it is:=20
<P><TT>#nslookup 20.0.0.2</TT> <BR><TT>*** Can't find server name for =
address=20
20.0.0.1: No response from server</TT> <BR><TT>*** Default servers are =
not=20
available</TT><TT></TT>=20
<P>Incidently IP 20.0.0.1 belongs to the server that I am working on.=20
<BR> =20
<P>Any suggestion on solving the problem? <BR> <BR> =20
<P>regards, <BR>Venantius. <BR> <BR> =20
<P>> Hi, <BR>> I have setup a small networking in my =
house. It=20
consists of 4 PCs. 3 <BR>> win95 PCs and one is a Linux =
box. =20
The Linux box acts as a file server <BR>> (running Samba). =
Now all my=20
machines can ftp and ping the Linux box and <BR>> vice versa. =
But=20
when it come to telnet, one of my win95 PC does not <BR>> connect - =
or=20
rather it get stuck half war. When I telnet from this <BR>>=20
particular machine, I get the first two greeting lines but never the =
<BR>>=20
login prompt. All my other machines are fine. <BR>> <BR>> =
I probed=20
further and found that this problem only persists for certain <BR>> =
IP=20
address. The following addresses have been assigned to the =
machines:=20
<BR>> <BR>> Linux box =3D 20.0.0.1 <BR>> win95-1 =3D 20.0.0.2 =
<BR>>=20
win95-2 =3D 20.0.0.3 <BR>> win95-3 =3D 20.0.0.4 <BR>> <BR>> =
No the=20
strange thing is that only win95-2 (which has the IP 20.0.0.3) =
<BR>> has=20
this problem. Can anyone help on this? I have posted this =
before=20
<BR>> but the problem has not been solved yet. <BR> =
<BR> =20
<BR> <BR> <BR> </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
=======_NextPart_000_016B_01BEE07A.70C4A500==
------------------------------
From: "bgchgfg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Intel EEPro/10
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 08:10:54 GMT
driver fir this card is already there, but it could support only one card
in a system for me, the module is called eepro
niraj
Ben Hatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I have an Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 ISA, and I have the driver for the
> PCI version (eepro10pci). Can it be modified, and if so, any
> suggestions on how to do that? Does anyone have experience with this
> card under Linux?!?! I need to get this machine running in a week or
> so, and I need to know if it would be worth it to fix this driver
> (preferred solution), or if it would be best to just buy a new card. I
> have 20+ of these cards available, so I would rather not buy new cards.
>
> I have a little experience in C++, so I can follow (hopefully!) the
> logic if there is any adice on reprogramming the driver. I can also
> send an email attachment with the driver if needed.
>
------------------------------
From: "B. T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading with IP Address and Mac Address Restrictions
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 23:50:48 -0700
The Internet-enabled T3 network at my college makes sure that the mac
address
of the NIC and the IP address of the computer match before allowing a
student
to access the Internet. At the beginning of the school year, each computer
is assigned
an unique IP address. The server "locks" onto the mac address of the NIC
and checks
to make sure the mac address corresponds to the IP address before allowing
the user to access
the Internet. So, if the user gets a new NIC, he will not be able to access
the Internet because
the mac address of the new NIC is different from the one on record. The
reason for this is that
last year people were using other people's IP address to do bad things. I
am trying to do
the same thing on my private network.
So, I am not trying to match the IP address to the mac address.
B.T.
Juergen Pabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> how are you planing to do that? the mac address is 48bit while ip
> addresses are 32bit. even if you'd decide to chop off 16bit, you also
> have to consider that all boxes *should* be in the same subnet (meaning:
> all mac#s need to be in a very small range, unlikely to happen)
>
> jp
------------------------------
From: Chad Wesley Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Setting up a PPP connection
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 01:01:42 -0600
Hello,
I'm fairly new to Linux and I installed Redhat 5.2 on my PC about a month
ago. I'm wondering how to get a PPP connection set up to work through
Linux. I do this on my PC under Windows 95 to get an internet connection.
I went into linuxconf and set up a few things, but I'm not sure if I have
to activate something first before connecting up to the internet, or if it
is supposed to automatically connect up when I try and start something
like telnet or Netscape.
This is what I do in Win95 with my PPP connection: I can either click on
the Connection icon to dial-up, or I can just start up Netscape or telnet
and then it will automatically bring up a screen to dial in to the modems.
How similar is this process to creating a PPP connection in Linux?
Chad Armstrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Three ethernet cards, one not found
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 07:31:53 GMT
I've been reading through the Ethernet howto, and a bunch of others. I
have a nice little 486 dx2-66 sitting here, with three ISA 3com nics in
it. They are all 3c509s, two of them are listed by the DOS (ugh) config
problem, er program, as 3c509-combo, and the last one is listed as a
3c509-TP. The 3c509-tp card seems to be the problem. I've tried a
couple of combos of IRQ and I/O for it, but I can't seem to get linux to
recognize it. I have the 3c509 driver compiled into the kernel, and
I've been using the 'ether' parameter from the lilo prompt to tell the
kernel where to find the cards etc. It seems unlikely that the card is
bad, since the dos config program recognizes it just find, and doesn't
have any problem changing the settings. If I've missed this in TFM
someplace, let me know so I can go back there and read it again.
Thanks!
Greg
--
It's pronounced "sexy" not "scuzzy"!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: help: booting a computer with bootp/dhcpd
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 07:28:55 GMT
Hello,
I set up two computers, one as as bootp/dhcpd server:
EtherNetAdr Server: 00:00:F4:5C:70:9E
Card: PCMCIA Corega Ether PCC-T
The card is assigned to an IP addess and running in promisc mode
(for tcpdump to scan for any activity on the line)
BootpServer: I tried both, dhcpd, and bootp.
and the other one as client:
EtherNetAdr Client: 00:40:26:3F:DA:0D
ne2k-pci.c* PCI NE2000 clone 'Via 82C926' at I/O 0xd400, IRQ 10
eth0: PCI NE2000 found at 0xd400, IRQ 10, 00:40:26:3F:DA:0D
.
A)Experiment 1:
===============
The client machine is booted from floppy disk, and uses a kernel
with the bootp option compiled in. After uncompressing the kernel,
the client is sending bootp request on the ethernet. At least this
what it tells it does.
Client Side:
============
EtherNetAdr Client: 00:40:26:3F:DA:0D
ne2k-pci.c* PCI NE2000 clone 'Via 82C926' at I/O 0xd400, IRQ 10
eth0: PCI NE2000 found at 0xd400, IRQ 10, 00:40:26:3F:DA:0D
Sending BOOTP requests...eth0: timeout waiting for Tz RDC
.eth0: timeout waiting for Tx RDC.
Server Side:
============
tcpdump -evvn -i eth0 on the server gives me this for each bootp
request that is sent from the client:
8:8:1:1:40:40 ff:ff:ff:ff:26:26 3939 406:
0000 ffff 0000 0000 0606 eaea 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 2626 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000
Questions:
==========
Question 1: What kind of package is this ? Bootp ? Why do I not
find the client's ethernet address in this packet ?
Question 2: I ran both, dhcpd and bootpd in debug mode. Why do the
bootp request not get to the bootpd/dhcpd server which would surely
show up in a debug message ?
Question 3: How does bootpd know the interface to listen at ? It is
not given on the comand line nor in the configuration file
(/etc/bootdtab). I did not find any remark on that in the how-to's or
in the man page.
B) Experiment 2 (Pinging):
==========================
1)I booted the client with a boot/root disk system.
2) The client is assigned IpAdr 130.149.5.2, the server gets 130.149.5.1
3) The route tables are set on both machines.
Pining from the server to the client does nothing (expect producing a
lot of arp-tell me requests), because there is no Inetd setup on the
client's
side
Pinging from the client to the server gives this:
Client side:
============
PING 130.149.5.1 (139.149.5.1): 56 data bytes
eth0: timeout waiting for TxRDC
eth0: timeout waiting for TxRDC
eth0: timeout waiting for TxRDC
neighbor table overflow
neighbor table overflow
neighbor table overflow
Server Side (tcpdump -evvn -i eth0)
===================================
14:44:05.973908 8:8:8:8:0:0 ff:ff:ff:ff:26:26 2626 60:
8282 0000 0000 0501 0606 eaea 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 2626 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 000
Questions:
==========
Question 1: Why did ping not work ?
Question 2: Why is the client's Ethernet Address not in the package ?
Help is appreciated, as I am struggeling with this for a month by now.
The first hurdle was the PCMCIA network card not working. It got
detected
by cardmgr, and looked well in the system logs - Nevertheless, it
wasn't working at all. This I could fix. Bootp seems to be the next
quest.
Thanks,
Tilman
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Andrew Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Recommend a good cheap 10/100 card?
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 07:56:47 +0100
I like the Netgear FA310TX, works with the default Tulip driver but also
comes with an updated linux driver on the floppy disk.
Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7og02s$evi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I read the HOWTO. There are alot of 10/100 cards to choose
>from. Can anyone recommend a cheap one that works well
>(at 100 MBS) with linux?
>Thanx,
>Art.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
