Linux-Networking Digest #206, Volume #12 Thu, 12 Aug 99 22:13:56 EDT
Contents:
Re: Firewall on same subnet? (Jerry Craker)
USR ISDN (Jerry Craker)
Re: What is net-pf-4? (Mike Kirk)
Re: Samba 2.03 and Microsoft Cobol (Chris Mahmood)
Re: Weird colors in X and Modem Problem ("Anita Lewis")
Re: DHCP + 3C509B NIC ?? ("Craig Mankiewicz")
Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: DHCP + 3C509B NIC ?? ("Craig Mankiewicz")
Problem with PCMCIA network card (Walid A. Majid)
Re: My first Network install - N (QuestionExchange)
Re: Bridge or IP Masquerade? (dmalcolm)
Re: Remote Login: Authetication failure ("mikes")
Re: Can Linux "see" Win95 drive/folders? How? (Jan-Albert van Ree)
Networking via Null Modem ("Mike")
Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address (Frederic Pont)
Re: band width (Frederic Pont)
Re: $15 card or $98 card? (Juergen Heinzl)
STMP Mail please help (Kenneth Rush)
Proxy Woes ("Chris Testa")
Wireless networks ("Mike")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jerry Craker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall on same subnet?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:55:50 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far as I know, that is not possible. The problem arises with routing.
You cannot have the same subnet/subnet mask on 2 separate cards on a
machine. The only real way to do this with the same "subnet" is to fix the
subnet mask such that each side of your firewall "looks" like a different
network. Do the IPs on the LAN need to remain exactly what they are, or
can you change them, such that if you changed the subnet mask, you could
have 2 separate lans. BTW, I am not sure what the subnet mask itself would
have to be.
--Jerry Craker --
Kyle Page wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is even possible (thus the post) but...
> I'm trying to setup a Linux Firewall (using Red Hat v5.2) between my DSL
> router and my local LAN. It goes something like this:
>
> ------ ----------- ---------- -----
> | WAN | -- | My router | ------- | Firewall | ------------ | LAN |
> ------ ----------- ---------- -----
> x.x.86.161 x.x.86.162 x.x.86.163
>
> Subnet: 255.255.255.240
> Network: x.x.86.160
>
> As you can see from the above, I'm trying to place the Firewall on the
> same subnet as the network for which I'd like to protect. That is,
> between my router and LAN. It seems like this would be possible
> somehow??? The problem I'm having now is that when I activate both
> cards on the firewall, only the last card to be activated is reachable..
> that is ping'able from the firewall machine. For example, if eth0 and
> eth1 are configured as x.x.86.162 and x.x.86.163 respectively, then I
> can only ping x.x.86.163 (assuming it is activated last). If I activate
> eth0 last, then only eth0 is reachable. However, if I configure them so
> they are on separate networks, let's say eth0 = x.x.85.122, and eth1 =
> x.x.86.163 and activate them both, they are both reachable. It is only
> when both NICs are configured to be on the same network that I have this
> problem. Therefore, I have ruled out any hardware problems. Would this
> "routing" issue be handled by "ipfwadm"? I've looked many places for a
> solution and I'm starting to lose gumption (sited "Zen and the Art of
> Motorcycle Maintenance") :) My DSL router does have Firewall software
> but I'd rather not spend the extra cash.. and I'd rather do it myself.
>
> Cheers,
> Kyle
------------------------------
From: Jerry Craker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.ppp,redhat.networking.general
Subject: USR ISDN
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:07:46 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have seen different things on the net regarding USR Sportster Internal
ISDN support for Linux. I was wondering if ANYONE had this working.
Currently, I have to run an NT server with Apache proxy, in order to
share my connection with the rest of my network. What I would like to
do is share the ISDN connection with the rest of the network via Linux.
I have Redhat 6.0 installed with the kernel at 2.9. I have a Compaq
10/100 Ethernet card (also seemingly unsupported-but will replace if
necessary), an old NE2000 Ethernet card, and my USR ISDN (ISA). If
anyone has any ideas on how to get the ISDN piece to work, I would
appreciate it. I have viewed everything on line (well, maybe not
everything-but as many as I could find) and the ISDN documentation, but
have not been able to get this to work.
Thanks,
-- Jerry Craker --
------------------------------
From: Mike Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What is net-pf-4?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 23:58:59 GMT
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Vilmos Soti wrote:
> Rippy wrote:
> >
> > Hi - I'm still fairly new at this game , but after recompiling my kernel
> > , I get these errors:
> >
> > (just after init decides what runlevel to enter - same for level 3 and
> > 5)
> >
> > modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
> > modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
> > modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> > modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >
> > Now I remember I used to see something like 'loading AppleTalk; loading
> > ethernet' before I fooled around with my kernel (and modules).
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Add the following lines to your /etc/conf.modules file:
>
> alias net-pf-4 off
> alias net-pf-5 off
As for the "What is..." part of the subject, I believe net-pf-4 refers to
IPX, and net-pf-5 refers to Appletalk. If you don't need them then you can
just alias them off.
Later,
Mike
=======================================
Linux 2.2.1 - 13 days, 1:57, - LA 1.00
------------------------------
From: Chris Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Samba 2.03 and Microsoft Cobol
Date: 12 Aug 1999 16:09:38 -0700
Abner Graham Jacobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed Caldera 2.2 with samba. I have an application made with
> Microsoft Cobol 4.0
That wouldn't be Visual Cobol++, would it?
-ckm
------------------------------
From: "Anita Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Weird colors in X and Modem Problem
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:03:44 -0400
This is your DNS and it goes in /etc/resolv.conf. You have to use and
editor and write it in there. Or you can use linuxconf and under Networking
it has DNS.
To find this information in Windows do My Computer/Dial-up Networking.
Right click on the hookup you are using ie Prodigy or whatever and select
Properties. Then pick the Server types tab, click on TCP/IP Settings and
you will see two numbers (or at least one) Primary and Secondary DNS.
In resolv.conf you write nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where this is that
number with decimal points in it. If one group of numbers is just two
digits, then just put those two in (no leading zero).
I think that is what you are referring to.
Anita
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> First X with KDE and the Voodoo3 XFree86 X server SOMETIMES displays wierd
> colors or has only a few linmes at the top of the screen. I'm running
> Mandrake 6.0 which I hear is very close to RedHat 6.0. This only applies
> to 16bit color modes (and up I think) not when I just type startx. I have
> to restart X with startx -- -bpp 16 several time before I can get it to
> work with the righjt display. If anyone could help me with this it would
> help greatly.
>
> Secoundly my modem which isn't a winmodem because it's too old (33.6) and
> it has a slew of jumpers on it. I don't even know what make it is but it
> works fine in Win98 (uck!) as a generic 33.6 modem. And under Linux
> running X11 and KDE with kppp I get it to dial connect and it says I'm
> connected at 33600 but Netscape and the KDE browser type file manager both
> say that I'm not connected. I read somewhere that I need to put some info
> in a conf file and that info is some what like xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and I can
> find it out in windows. But where? I'm obviously a newbie to Linux.
> I've had it for 2 days.
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Craig Mankiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP + 3C509B NIC ??
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:35:59 -0400
I have the exact configuration you do and I am having the exact same
problem. If you figure it out, please post your results. Thanks.
Lance C Dial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 02:32:54 -0500, "Stew Rappaport"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hello- I have installed two 3C509B cards in my RedHat 6.0 system. I
have
> >configured them with the DOS utility to both have PnP Disabled and they
have
> >separate IRQ's. Using the control-panel applet in Gnome I configured
eth0
> >to use DHCP and activate at boot. I configured eth1 with a 192.168.x.x
IP
> >address.
> > My problem is then when I connect eth0 to my cable modem it says on
boot
> >that:
> >
> >bringing up device eth0
> >FAILED: unable to determine IP information. FAILED.
> >
> >After this if I run ifconfig I get only information for lo and eth1.
> >
> >I KNOW my ISP uses DHCP, and I have heard of some who use it successfully
> >with this ISP. What is my problem. I have read the DHCP mini-HOWTO
without
> >much luck. Am I being to vague, missing something obvious, or just
stupid.
> >Why am I not getting a public IP address? Any help or suggestions would
be
> >greatly appreciated. Thanks.
> >Stew Rappaport
> >
> >
>
> I had the exact same problems. I found out that I needed to
> power-cycle the cable modem and let it sit off for a few minutes. Then
> I turned it back on and ran this command:
>
> /sbin/pump -h hostname -i eth1
>
> Well, for you it would be eth0 and the hostname would be your Linux
> hostname, which should be the one they supplied you. If they did not
> give you one, use whatever hostname you are currently using on the
> Linux box.
>
> In order to make this stick after a reboot, you have to edit your ifup
> file to include the /sbin/pump command just like above. I think the
> ifup file is in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts but it may be somewhere
> else, I can't remember.
>
> I have an identical setup with the two 3C509Bs (PnP disabled) RH6.0
> and I was getting the same errors. Good luck
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:05:20 -0700
Your ifconfig statement for eth0 looks like etho (with letter 'o'). Make
sure it's eth0 (with '0' - zero!).
Good luck!
Youjip Won <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear Linux guru,
> I am fan of linux, but never ever able to get the network setup in
> one shot. This time was not an exception. After several trials and
> errors, I am finally writing this message in a hope that I could get
> some help.
>
> To make long story short, I cannot add gateway to routing table.
>
> Here's what had happened. I can ifconfig and route add 'lo' and 'etho'.
> When I do "route add default gw 166.104.88.1", it does not complain.
> BUT, if I type 'route' to verify the gw in routing table, it goes to the
> infinite loop. It only shows the first two lines in routing table(lo,
> eth0) and goes into infinite loop. I eagerly hope that someone have had
> similar problems and provide me some clue.
> Please refer to the attached script.
> Thanks a mil!!!!
>
> Youjip
>
> Script started on Thu Aug 12 21:40:56 1999
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# ifconfig
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route add -net 127.0.0.0
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# ifconfig etho 166.104.88.108
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route add -net 166.104.88.0
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> lo
> 166.104.88.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route add gw 166.104.88.1
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> lo
> 166.104.88.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> ===> Goes to infinite loop
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Craig Mankiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP + 3C509B NIC ??
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:37:21 -0400
I have the exact configuration you do and I am having the exact same
problem. If you figure it out, please post your results. Thanks.
Lance C Dial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 02:32:54 -0500, "Stew Rappaport"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hello- I have installed two 3C509B cards in my RedHat 6.0 system. I
have
> >configured them with the DOS utility to both have PnP Disabled and they
have
> >separate IRQ's. Using the control-panel applet in Gnome I configured
eth0
> >to use DHCP and activate at boot. I configured eth1 with a 192.168.x.x
IP
> >address.
> > My problem is then when I connect eth0 to my cable modem it says on
boot
> >that:
> >
> >bringing up device eth0
> >FAILED: unable to determine IP information. FAILED.
> >
> >After this if I run ifconfig I get only information for lo and eth1.
> >
> >I KNOW my ISP uses DHCP, and I have heard of some who use it successfully
> >with this ISP. What is my problem. I have read the DHCP mini-HOWTO
without
> >much luck. Am I being to vague, missing something obvious, or just
stupid.
> >Why am I not getting a public IP address? Any help or suggestions would
be
> >greatly appreciated. Thanks.
> >Stew Rappaport
> >
> >
>
> I had the exact same problems. I found out that I needed to
> power-cycle the cable modem and let it sit off for a few minutes. Then
> I turned it back on and ran this command:
>
> /sbin/pump -h hostname -i eth1
>
> Well, for you it would be eth0 and the hostname would be your Linux
> hostname, which should be the one they supplied you. If they did not
> give you one, use whatever hostname you are currently using on the
> Linux box.
>
> In order to make this stick after a reboot, you have to edit your ifup
> file to include the /sbin/pump command just like above. I think the
> ifup file is in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts but it may be somewhere
> else, I can't remember.
>
> I have an identical setup with the two 3C509Bs (PnP disabled) RH6.0
> and I was getting the same errors. Good luck
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walid A. Majid)
Subject: Problem with PCMCIA network card
Date: 13 Aug 1999 00:13:49 GMT
i have a toshiba tecra 500cdt with red hat 6.0 on it (kernel 2.2.5-15)
with a 3com pcmcia network card (model 3ccfe574bt). i have been trying
unsuccessfuly to configure the network interface and was wondering if
someone can point me to the right direction.
the problem is that when i try to use the eth0 interface, either using
usernet or by issuing the following command:
sh -x /etc/pcmcia/network start eth0
i get the following message:
delaying eth0 initialization
one problem which i have noticed is that when i insert my card, the
machine beeps only once - my understanding based on reading the howto's
was that it should beep twice.
but i believe linux recognizes my card because issuing 'cardctl ident'
comes back with:
socket 1:
product info: "3Com", "Megahertz 574B", "B", "001"
manfid: 0x0101, 0x0574
function: 6 (network)
cardctl status comes back with:
socket 1:
5v 16-bit card present
function 0: read, write protect
and last, /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia has a line that says:
PCMCIA=yes
if anyone can help i would really appreciate it.
thanks.
walid
------------------------------
From: QuestionExchange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: My first Network install - N
Date: 11 Aug 1999 15:23:42 GMT
> I need advices on how to configure a server/router using my new
> ASDL internet connection. ( ..... Long term objective is to
> make this router my network server with Linux OS to serve my
> current machine (B) and a future machine (machine name: X). ...
> Note that I also plan to install HTTP server, Samba, File
> server, and more ) Short term objective (if realistic) is to
> set up a machine (A) as a server (gateway) which will also act
> as a firewall for my second machine (B). I plan to connect
> these machines through NICs with twisted pair RJ45. Machine
> (A) config: 486SX66 - 8 Meg ram hd 1 gig - 2 network cards----
> 1> Dlink PNP model (?) --- 2-> 3Com model 3c503 512k Ram on
> Graphic card - VGA/EGA Trident 9000 I plan to use my ADSL
> connection (connected to my 3com 3c503) to install RadHat by
> ftp using bootnet.img diskette. - Is it faisable ? - If not,
> what other solution I have ? - Is this hardare sufficient to
> support XFree86/Xwindows installation - Is redhat a good choice
> for server setup Any suggestions, comments and questions are
> more than welcome. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
I did nearly the exact same thing with a low end Pentium,
except with Debian (http://www.debian.org) instead of RedHat
because (IMHO) it is easier to install via FTP and is all
around more bug-free, stable, and mature distribution. It
probably will work for RedHat, too, but you might want to give
Debian a shot. There's no way that you can realistically run X
with 8 MB of RAM. My server machine (a Pentium 150 w/ 32 MB of
RAM and 3 GB of disk with the services you describe running)
handles the job fine..but I'd recommend moving to 32 MB of RAM
on your system and making at least 32 MB of swap, if you plan
to run all of those services. Honestly, I think you'd be
disappointed with X's performance even then, unless you ran an
ultra-lightweight window manager (like fvwm2 or blackbox).
Whichever distribution you choose, read the IP-Masquerading
mini-HOWTO (available from the Linux Documentation Project at
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP). It helped me a great deal and
covers setting up the linux server and any linux or windows
clients. What you are trying to do is a perfect example of why
Linux is a far superior niche os than Windows NT. It would take
$900 and the horsepower of a $2000 PC to do with NT Server what
you can do with Linux on an 'obsolete' machine.
--
This answer is courtesy of QuestionExchange.com
http://www.questionexchange.com/servlet1/showUsenetGuest?ans_id=2512&cus_id=USENET&qtn_id=1574
------------------------------
From: dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bridge or IP Masquerade?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:12:11 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============54CEFD691B7EE23586BCF8ED
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
If you used IP Masquerade, that suggests you were using fake IP's.
Nothing wrong with that as long as the IP's never reach the Internet. If
thats the case I would recommend continueing to use IP Masquerade.
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I currently have a small LAN at home that I wish to connect to the net
> via a gateway. I use an @home cable modem connection that is routed
> through a redhat 6.0 machine with (soon enough) 2 network adapters.
> My question is, should I configure the linux machine to be a bridge
> between my LAN and the net, or should I use IP Masquerade as I used to
> do with a modem? Thanks.
==============54CEFD691B7EE23586BCF8ED
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="dmalcolm.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for dmalcolm
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="dmalcolm.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Malcolm;Dan
tel;fax:256-895-9934
tel;home:256-772-3109
tel;work:256-722-2840
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Home
adr:;;1308 Nolan Court;Madison;AL;35758;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software Engineer/SysAdmin
x-mozilla-cpt:;25680
fn:Dan Malcolm
end:vcard
==============54CEFD691B7EE23586BCF8ED==
------------------------------
From: "mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Remote Login: Authetication failure
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 19:24:28 -0500
Reply-To: "mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ahh.. this solution works. But how secure is it? Once I got the /etc/inittab
file modified to support my serial port, I was able to do this, but.. I
can't seem to telnet into the server, which is what I'd rather do.
What exactly is required on both the Win95 machine, and the SMB server to
initiate a succesful telnet session through TCP/IP?
I'm using Windoze telnet, but can't seem to start a session. When I do so,
my Windoze machine dials my ISP. I'm sure there is a logical explanation for
this...
flobro wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>"Gregory D. Horne" wrote:
>
>> mikes wrote:
>>
>> > Can somebody point me to the *fine* manual that will tell me why I get
an
<snip>
>> > authentication failure. Why is this?
<snip>
>> Check the authentication type on the machine running Windows to ensure it
is
>> compatible with the authentication on the machine running Linux.
Clear-Text is
>> typically the authentication supported by Linux.
>
>As far as I know "root" is not allowed by telnet, ftp unless it occurs on a
known
>secure tty (typically a console- see file /etc/securetty). Usually you log
in a
>yourself, then use "su" to promote yourself to "root".
------------------------------
From: Jan-Albert van Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can Linux "see" Win95 drive/folders? How?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 22:26:43 +0200
Michael Ward schreef:
>
> With Samba I have been able to make my W95 box "see" the Linux box
> (folders, sub-f, files), but how do you get the Linux machine to see
> drives/folders/files on the W95 machine?? I have tried everything I can
> think of/read about. Many thanks for any suggestions.
smbclient -L \\pc-name
pc-name is the name of the box (or the IP)
It will give a list of shares
With the smbmount command you can actually mount the disk for use.
--
Jan-Albert "Sliver" van Ree | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3D Sims Archive maintainer | http://www.3dgamers.com
------------------------------
From: "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Networking via Null Modem
Date: 13 Aug 1999 01:04:24 GMT
Does anyone know how to set up a null modem network between RH6.0 and Win98?
------------------------------
From: Frederic Pont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:40:25 GMT
some ideas :
0. try "route add default gw 166.104.88.1 dev eth0"
1. be sure to configure the netmask correctly for eth0 (255.255.255.0)
2. can you ping your gateway before adding your default route ?
3. if you cannot, the problem could be the driver (IRQ conflict ??) and
not the network configuration.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Youjip Won <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Linux guru,
> I am fan of linux, but never ever able to get the network setup in
> one shot. This time was not an exception. After several trials and
> errors, I am finally writing this message in a hope that I could get
> some help.
>
> To make long story short, I cannot add gateway to routing table.
>
> Here's what had happened. I can ifconfig and route add 'lo' and
'etho'.
> When I do "route add default gw 166.104.88.1", it does not complain.
> BUT, if I type 'route' to verify the gw in routing table, it goes to
the
> infinite loop. It only shows the first two lines in routing table(lo,
> eth0) and goes into infinite loop. I eagerly hope that someone have
had
> similar problems and provide me some clue.
> Please refer to the attached script.
> Thanks a mil!!!!
>
> Youjip
>
> Script started on Thu Aug 12 21:40:56 1999
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# ifconfig
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use
> Iface
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route add -net 127.0.0.0
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# ifconfig etho 166.104.88.108
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route add -net 166.104.88.0
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use
> Iface
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0
> lo
> 166.104.88.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0
> eth0
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route add gw 166.104.88.1
> [root@sobaek network-scripts]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use
> Iface
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0
> lo
> 166.104.88.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0
> eth0
> ===> Goes to infinite loop
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Frederic Pont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: band width
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:42:58 GMT
How come you don't get good result with SNMP ??
You can use /proc/net/dev to figure out the number of bytes going
through each interface.
Fred
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dominique Delporte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --------------80F29AEAF048E8CAACE8AF4B
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hello every body
> Somebody can help me to get information about band width, but not
> using SNMP because I don't obtain good
> result with it.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> --
> Dominique__________ ____/________ /_______
> ______Delporte____ __/ _ ___/_ __ \ __ \
> _________________ /___ / /__ _ / / / /_/ /
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/_____/ \___/ /_/ /_/\____/
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: $15 card or $98 card?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:11:56 GMT
In article <7ouqqh$9vk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Leblanc wrote:
>In article <7otn17$ghf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mark Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > that some cards cost as little as $15 and some as hign as $98!
>> > what's the difference between them?
>>
>> marketing. the 98 is probably some gilded card with "3com" or "intel"
>> on it. the $15 is probably a noname with a ne2k clone or similar.
>> in most cases, a $15 card is going to work very nicely for you;
>> in some cases, you should trade up to a $25 tulip/tulipclone.
>>
>> there's _ZERO_ reason to buy an overpriced 3com/etc.
>
>Zero reason unless you care about having a card that was designed within
> the last 10+ years. And zero reason unless you care about being able
>to call the company and get support within 15 minutes, and a replacement
>card overnighted if you ask. And zero reason if you don't care about
>your PC going to 15% CPU usage in order to send one packet over
>ethernet.
My 2 ones ... I've (had) 3c309's at work (two) and at home (two). Bought
them years ago and for one this is the third machine now, never caused
trouble so I cannot say much about their support (never required) and
while for sure some �� are paid for the name, quality usually pays for
itself (out of experience).
Cheers,
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenneth Rush)
Subject: STMP Mail please help
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:22:22 -0800
-**** Posted from RemarQ, http://www.remarq.com/?c ****-
Search and Read Usenet Discussions in your Browser
------------------------------
From: "Chris Testa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Proxy Woes
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:11:21 -0400
I have a computer connected with a modem to my ISP. My external IP is
generated randomly by Worldnet (the ISP). I set up WinProxy on that
computer with a local IP of 90.0.0.1, subnet of 255.255.255.0 as it
recommended (That is my server). The client is set up with the network and
everything works in Windows. The client's IP is 90.0.0.2. I just installed
linux (Red Hat 6.0) on the client machine last Sunday. I figured that all I
needed to do was set up Netscape to use the server (90.0.0.1), but that
isn't working. What things do I need to set up in Linux so that way it will
run? My ethernet card (LinkSys) is suported, it found the tulip driver on
installation, which according to the linksys web page is the right one.
Possibly I need to specify the local IP adress and subnet? Please, any help
would be greatly appreciated:-)
--
- Chris
------------------------------
From: "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wireless networks
Date: 13 Aug 1999 00:57:55 GMT
Does anybody know of any wireless networking products that work with RedHat
6?
--Mike
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
