Linux-Networking Digest #259, Volume #12 Tue, 17 Aug 99 16:13:49 EDT
Contents:
Setting up a Network in Linux for Win95 ("Omega")
DHCP Problem ("Doug Thews")
Re: what op system? ("YouDontKnowWho")
Re: emachines eOne w/ Intel 21145 ethernet controller under Linux?` (Henrik
Carlqvist)
3C905B server performance problem (sjm)
Re: How many concurente masqueraded connection can handle Linux (Chris)
Re: D-Link NIC (FS)
Re: Resolving IPs (Chris)
Re: Cable Modems ("YouDontKnowWho")
Re: samba confusion w. Win98 (Ronald Cole)
slow PPP on Slackware 4 (Daniel Ng)
Unsupported protocol (0x80fd) received. What can I do? (Nada Amin)
Re: Samba authentication question... ("cyberant")
Re: Newbie and Ethernet Card (Sean Turner)
Re: can't talk to a SUN machine ? (Johannes Ziegler)
IP Tunneling? (Adam Lynch)
Problems with inetd (Eran Dvey-Aharon)
Networking two RedHat 5.2 machines? (Warren Bell)
PPP and Compuserve ("Alex Lazen")
ftp problem ("F.B.Quinn")
nfs server problem ("F.B.Quinn")
DNS+multidomain+one IP ("LeSauvage")
routing (Guilhem Tardy)
Re: Kernel compiling (Sudhakar Govindarajan)
What proxyserver should I use? (Alex)
Re: Write errors via NFS with new Linux kernels 2.2.x/2.3.x (John O'Donnell)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Omega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Setting up a Network in Linux for Win95
Date: 17 Aug 1999 13:30:10 -0400
How do I setup Linux RH 6.0 so that it can network to a Win95 machine and
vise versa?
Thank You
Omega
------------------------------
From: "Doug Thews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP Problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:25:35 -0500
I've connected a Redhat 6.0 workstation to my internal network driven by an
NT DHCP server. It seems that the DHCP server will give me an IP address
and netmask, but not the default gateway, name servers, and other
information that all of my workstations successfully receive by default.
I've seen this configuration work in another small office, but don't know
what I've done wrong. My assumption is that the DHCP server should send all
of the IP information needed (just like my other workstations).
Any help for a person new to Linux would be appreciated.
--
Doug Thews
Director, Client Solutions
D&D Consulting Services
------------------------------
From: "YouDontKnowWho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: what op system?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:08:16 GMT
Since you appear to have an account on that system (cs.queensu.ca),
how about telnetting to it and running the 'uname -a' command?
--
Principle of Minimum Access: "That which is not explicitly permitted
is denied."
ANNOUNCER: And now we return to our regularly scheduled, uncommonly
entertaining thread...
Bob Tennent wrote in message <7paio1$p0v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>How can I discover which operating system my cable company is
>using in its very unreliable servers?
>
>Bob T.
------------------------------
From: Henrik Carlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: emachines eOne w/ Intel 21145 ethernet controller under Linux?`
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 18:43:55 +0200
Dirk Leas wrote:
> Anybody have a clue about which linux network driver might work?
Try to boot with a Slackware NFS installation boot floppy. That kernel
is able to autodetect most network cards.
regards Henrik
--
spammer strikeback:
root@localhost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: sjm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3C905B server performance problem
Date: 17 Aug 1999 10:48:34 PDT
Hello,
I have a dual-processor P-III 450 system acting as an Apache webserver,
co-located on a 10Mbit connection at a datacenter. It is running
RedHat 6.0 with a 2.2.10 kernel (built from source). The system has
two 3C905B (Cyclone) PCI fast ethernet cards -- the system is acting
as a masquerading firewall as well as a webserver. The system is using
the stock 3c5xx.c version 0.99H driver that comes with the kernel.
The cards are both connected to 3Com SuperStack II 3C16464A swtiches
(the outer card is connected to one switch, the inner network card
is connected to another). There's almost no traffic going through
the masquerade right now, but there's a lot of traffic hitting the
webserver (about 300,000 requests per day). The Apache webserver is
working like a champ, and the load on the machine is never above 0.1.
The problem we're seeing is that the performance on the 3C905B degrades
quickly over time under constant load. Ping times start out very good
-- around 15ms. But they increase over the course of about two hours,
until ping times are up to 10000ms or more, HORRIBLE performance.
Packet loss is almost none, and I'm getting no frame or dropped packet
errors -- only the ping time is increasing and throughput drops to
under 2kbps.
I can easily fix the problem by bringing the eth0 interface down and
then up again. Usually by doing "/etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart".
It works like a charm, and ping times drop back down to 15ms, throughput
returns to normal.
This is a very strange problem, I've never seen it before. Does anyone
have any suggestions as to what the problem might be? Should I have
gone with different hardware, or is this something which can be fixed
through a configuration change? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.
I've included output from "dmesg" and "ifconfig -a" below. The x's
for address numbers are so my employer doesn't get upset with me :)
dmesg
~~~~~
3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xb800, xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx, IRQ 12
8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
MII transceiver found at address 0, status 786d.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
eth1: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xb400, xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx, IRQ 10
8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
MII transceiver found at address 24, status 7849.
MII transceiver found at address 0, status 7849.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
ifconfig -a
~~~~~~~~~~~
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:255.255.255.224
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4658698 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3684901 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:12 Base address:0xb800
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.x Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:512898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:712698 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xb400
-Seth
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: How many concurente masqueraded connection can handle Linux
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:16:46 GMT
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 18:26:00 -0700, "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>> Somebody knows how many users can handle a Linux Firewall
>> based on kernel 2.0.36 with ipfwadm and Masquerading ?
IP Masquerading only reserves 4096 ports for concurrent masqueraded
connections. Each connection will use at least two ports for DNS, and
then each page will have 2-10 ports to retrieve page elements (thanks to
banner ads, etc.). If you have too many users, you may run out of
available ports before you run out of bandwidth.
------------------------------
From: FS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: D-Link NIC
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:04:05 GMT
Personally I would ask the D-link corporation if I were you.
M O'Neill wrote:
> Cross posted:
> comp.os.linux.networking
> alt.os.linux
>
> What driver is used with the D-link 10Mbs PCI network card?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: Resolving IPs
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:03:56 GMT
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:36:57 -0700, Thomas/Shurflo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>I've been using tcpdump to monitor and capture traffic. Some of the
>sites are only accessable if you use the fully qualified name. But they
>actually resolve to a different name. If I try to go to the site it
>resolves to (the IP address) I'm taken to a different site. Anyone have
>any ideas why or how this happens?
The site in question is using a single machine to host multiple web
domains. This is quite common. Several FQDNs resolve to the same
address, and the www server examines the HTTP request sent by the browser
to see which site the user thinks he is browsing an sends the appropriate
page.
Just typing in IP addresses may or may not work, depending on whether or
not the web server was configured to return a default page when no name
match occurs. Surfing to the real domain name (the one resulting from an
IP reverse lookup) should get you the home page of the company or person
running the server.
------------------------------
From: "YouDontKnowWho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cable Modems
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:54:43 GMT
1. Very doable and much better than dial-up. I have mine set up
using MediaOne.
2. Most likely your IP address will be assigned via DHCP. So, you
Linux client needs to be able to run that (the DHCP **CLIENT**, that
is).
3. Before you connect your system to the network, make sure you
secure it. As a minimum, you need:
a. /etc/hosts.deny - comment out everything but ALL:ALL
b. /etc/hosts.allow - comment out all lines
c. /etc/inetd.conf - comment out lines that allow telnet, ftp,
and other "in" services
d. Turn off all incoming, unnecessary daemons, like http, dhcpd,
etc.
4. About item #3 above: this is by no means a complete list, but it
will prevent unwanted visitors from getting in using standard
services. I hope others will chime in.
5. If you don't have it already, start working on a Linux kernel with
firewall support.
The bottom line is that you don't want your system connected to the
network naked. Once you get your firewall up and running, you can
start turning the stuff from item #3 back on (if needed).
--
Principle of Minimum Access: "That which is not explicitly permitted
is denied."
ANNOUNCER: And now we return to our regularly scheduled, uncommonly
entertaining thread...
Chad Zalkin wrote in message ...
>Hi, I am looking into getting a cable modem. Before I call my cable
>provider, I'd like to be sure I can use this in Linux. (And I'm
guessing the
>provider will be of no help if I don't know what to ask them).
>
>Does anyone have this set up? Should I get a certain type of modem?
What
>questions should I ask the provider to be sure it will work under
Linux and
>Win98? How can I figure out if my existing network card works under
Linux.
>(I've never used it in anything under linux).
>
>I'm running Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 on a Compaq Presario (PIII)
>
>
>Thanks in advance!
>Chad Zalkin
>
>
------------------------------
From: Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba confusion w. Win98
Date: 17 Aug 1999 11:38:28 -0700
chipw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could also try the password files on the win98 cd. In the /tools/mtsutil
> directory you will find two files, one called ptxt_off.inf and one called
> ptxt_on.inf. To turn off encrypted passwords in win98 just right click the
> ptxt_on.inf and hit install from the menu. Works like a charm.
Maybe, but I wouldn't recommend this if your Win98 box is on a public
network. It's trivial to get encrypted passwords working with samba
if you can read. Took me all of 5 minutes on a RH6.0 system with
samba-2.0.5a and a vanilla Win98 system.
--
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My PGP fingerprint: 15 6E C7 91 5F AF 17 C4 24 93 CB 6B EB 38 B5 E5
------------------------------
From: Daniel Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: slow PPP on Slackware 4
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:53:22 +0000
Hello,
Recently, I have switched from RedHat to Slackware4.0. I find that the
ppp connection to my ISP is very slow. I used "pppsetup" to set up the
infomation. But the transmission speed is less than 1Kbytes/second. I
am using USR 56K modem and I had 4-6K bytes/second before.
could someone offer me some help?
Daniel
------------------------------
From: Nada Amin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unsupported protocol (0x80fd) received. What can I do?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:20:51 GMT
Hi,
I used to have the following in my /var/log/message
Aug 16 01:26:28 localhost pppd[641]: CCP: timeout sending Config-
Requests
After adding noccp in my /etc/ppp/options, I get, which is no better:
... pppd : Unsupported protocol (0x80fd) received.
How can I solve this connection problem I am struggling for so long?
Thanks
--
==========================
Nada Amin
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "cyberant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba authentication question...
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 01:25:33 +0200
Try chmod and setting the various directories that you point to in smb.conf
to allow anybody to wirte. Then take away the rights until you are satisfied
it is okay.
Read the man pages on chmod.
You can also try and put in lines like,
guest ok = yes
and/or
writable = yes
in your smb.conf
There should be a sample smb.conf to tinker with and see how it works.
Silent Mobious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> i've got samba setup and working on my linux box, and can browse the
> shares i've setup in samba.conf from both my windoze nt and 98 machines.
> the problem comes up with write access, which i don't have setup right.
> when i try to delete, create, whatever from my 98 machine it gives me an
> access is denied error. i could only get samba to work by setting the
> security mode = server and the password server pointing to my nt machine.
> i've setup a user account in linux and nt for the account i have in 98,
> and matched passwords on them all, but no dice. i've been reading most
> posts in these newsgroups and several different web sites and haven't
> gotten much of anywhere, since most are about the initial setup and not
> the user configuration i think i need... any help would be appreciated!
>
> silent
------------------------------
From: Sean Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie and Ethernet Card
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:46:02 GMT
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Monte Phillips wrote:
The other way to make this work is to just UNPLUG the machine machine from the
wall between bootups. it resets the PnP. I just figured this little tid-bit o
information out.
>Most NIC's now are PnP's, that means that windows can auto-configure
>them. You need to disable that function. Ususally you have to get
>the mfr's utility disk or install disk. BUT WARNING if you do
>disable it and get it running in linux, the instant you boot windows
>it is auto reset to PnP again, so you must got through the whole
>routine of disabling, in order to use linux. IMHO it is pure
>stupidity to have a dual boot system on a network.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>I'm trying to set a PC in my house up to act as a network server,
>>running Slackware 4.0. I have a D-Link Ethernet card (530TX) which
>>uses the rtl8139 chipset. I obtained the source code, compiled it
>>according to the directions in the source, and tried to add the binary
>>to the kernel as a module "insmod rtl8139.o". I get the error message
>>that "the device or resource is busy". I did a "lsmod", and the module
>>wasn't listed. Am I doing this incorrectly?
>>
>>Using Boot Magic, the machine dual boots to Win 98 and Linux. I have
>>tested the card under Win98 (peer to peer gaming), and the card works
>>flawlessly. The machine has a 4.3GB HD (2.5GB dedicated to Linux and
>>its swap partition), 64 meg of RAM, a 24x cd-rom, an Ensoniq Audio PCI
>>sound card (not active under Linux), and a 300MHZ AMD K-6 processor,
>>running on an ASUS TX-97E motherboard.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:06:12 +0200
From: Johannes Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't talk to a SUN machine ?
Theodor Cranendonk wrote:
> Does anybody know if there is a talk deamon for
> linux that allows one to talk to a sun machine. Or are there
> any other options ?
>
> I keep getting: [Checking for invitation on caller's machine]
> but nothing else.
>
> thanks
>
> +------------------------------------+
> | Theodor Cranendonk |
> | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> +------------------------------------+
Why don�t you try the ytalk-package that�s shipped with RH6.
In our department it works fine. Try it.
The RPM is available on all REDHAT mirrors.
Johannes Ziegler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Adam Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Tunneling?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:49:34 +0000
I was wondering if this would be a good application for IP Tunneling.
I work for a medium sized ISP, and am currently using at home a
wireless
high-speed access solution. I have a small Linux/Windows network behind
it,
and enough IP's for a few more nets. I also have a full class C which I
use for testing
at work.
We're looking at phasing out the wireless solution, and my only
recourse for
high-speed access is a cable modem trough our local cable company. where
swinging even a static IP is tough.
However, I have some security mechanisms on my network at work that
make
administrating the work net from home impossible. Most are keyed off of
the
originating IP, and also rely on router filters for access to a large
number
of hosts. Dealing with this using a gateway at home whose IP can change
is
a big pain. Bordering on impossible.
I'm a Linux admin and network guy by trade, but have never played
with IP
Tunneling. So I'm wondering if this would be possible:
To have a machine on my net at work act as a gateway for a block of IP
addresses (say a /28), and have a machine on my home net act as the
gateway for
that net. This way, I could just change the access lists and such once,
and
not have to worry about what my current IP is.
I have heard of things like this being done, but I'm not sure if
IP Tunneling
was used for it.
Thanks for any info!
__
---
AdamL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sprawl.net
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately
explained by stupidity.
-Robert Heinlein, 'Logic of Empire'
Given the choice, control, development, services and
support Red Hat Linux offers users, the question isn't
whether Linux is the best choice for the enterprise - it's
how can legacy proprietary operating systems survive in
an open source world?
-Robert Young, CEO, Red Hat
------------------------------
From: Eran Dvey-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with inetd
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:41:26 +0300
Hi all.
I am running a linux box installed with redhat 6.0
The inetd crashes after some weeks. The computer still reacts to ping
and telnet, but not to nfs, rlogin,rsh.
Does this make any sence ?
I can restart the daemon by rerunning the inet (inet stop ; inet start
in the /etc/rc.. directory).
Is it a bug in inet ?
Where can I get a compatible but more stable version of it ? I need it
to have my box be my primary file server, and it can't crash on NFS.
Eran.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:30:03 -0700
From: Warren Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Networking two RedHat 5.2 machines?
Hi,
I'm fairly farmilliar with Linux but don't know anything about
networking and need some advice. What I want to do is have machine 1
connected to the internet via modem 24/7. Then be able to connect
machine 2 through machine 1 to the internet and have access to machine 1
also. Machine 2 wont have any modem, just the network connection.
What kind of hardware will I need? I want to go the easiest route, this
will just be a home-based web server. And how do I go about setting it
up on RH 5.2?
Any help is appreciated,
Warren Bell
--
####### Remove ERASE to reply #######
------------------------------
From: "Alex Lazen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP and Compuserve
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:39:27 -0400
Has anyone successfully connected via PPP by using Compuserve as your ISP ??
Is there any documentation explaining the procedure ? I've searched the
Newsgroups and other sourcs but nothing yet.
Thanks
Alex
------------------------------
From: "F.B.Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:54:23 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two side-by-side RH6.0 boxes on campus network, will ping each other,
will telnet to each other, but will NOT permit ftp access to each
other. Why???
/home/ftp is chmod 777 (for test purposes only) and still no joy.
Appreciate suggestions!
F. B. Quinn, Jr., M.D.
UTMB Galveston TX USA
------------------------------
From: "F.B.Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nfs server problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:52:32 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My nfs server would not recognize clients.
Realized I had forgot to build /etc/exports file, containing names
of clients! Works great now.
(Polish salute)
F. B. Quinn, JR., M.D.
UTMB Galveston TX USA
------------------------------
From: "LeSauvage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS+multidomain+one IP
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:07:46 -0400
I have one valid (real) IP from a cable internet provider. But I wish to
hosting many friend�s home pages, with separate domains.
How I configure DNS (named) in order to have multiple domains
(www.domain1.org, www.domain2.org, ...etc) with a unique IP (one server
machine, in other words?)
Thanks, very.
Carlos R. Caicedo, VE
------------------------------
From: Guilhem Tardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: routing
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:03:09 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============369E054C0E1D55A867C2A669
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi there!
I am setting up a small network with 3 LANs and static routing:
---- A ----
B C ---- rest of the world
A is just a wire.
C has a computer [C1] with 3 ethernet cards (C LAN, A LAN and rest of
the world) and is used as a Gateway.
B has a computer [B1] with 2 ethernet cards (B LAN and A LAN) and is
used as a Gateway.
One can see [C1] from [B1], but no other computer on the B LAN can see
it. With a command "ping", the ARP packets asking for "who has [C1]" get
properly to [B1] but they are not forwarded any further.
(See attached the result of "netstat -rn" on those machines...)
Would anyone of you please help me to find out what's wrong in my
config?
Guilhem Tardy.
==============369E054C0E1D55A867C2A669
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
name="ttt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="ttt"
[B1]
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.0.65 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.194 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.32 192.168.0.193 255.255.255.224 UG 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.192 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.65 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
[C1]
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
142.92.38.65 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.33 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.193 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth2
192.168.0.32 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224 UG 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.64 192.168.0.194 255.255.255.224 UG 0 0 0 eth2
192.168.0.192 192.168.0.193 255.255.255.224 UG 0 0 0 eth2
192.168.0.192 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth2
142.92.32.0 142.92.38.65 255.255.224.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
142.92.32.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.224.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 142.92.32.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
==============369E054C0E1D55A867C2A669==
------------------------------
From: Sudhakar Govindarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Kernel compiling
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:43:28 GMT
I'm not if the solution that I offer here would work, but hey give it a
shot and see if it works.. I had a similiar problem.. U may want to
upgrade your pppd to the latest version. Looks like there is a bit of
incompatability between 2.2.6 Kernel and the old pppd. Download &
install the latest pppd from
ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/system/networks/serial/ppp
For problem#2, do u have Tcl/Tk installed on the other computer.?
Let me know if it helps.
Sudhakar G
Frederik Likaj wrote:
>
> I have just figured out ( i believed) how to get my RealTek8019 working.I
>
> went throw /usr/src/linux 1-make dep,make clean,make bzImage,make modules
>
> and make modules_install.Before that i had my ppp running and i could
>
> connect to internet on my RedHat 6.0.After i run make bzImage I just copy
>
> it to my floppy disc wich i use to boot into linux.It seems that eth0 work
>
> and i can ping around but i have lost my ppp conection.When i try to
>
> connect the modem don't react and it hangs on the yellow light.I believe
>
> that i have not done 100% right with the kernel compiling.What should i do?
>
> I use a floppy disc to boot linux.
>
> 2-Another problem is that i have another P.C. running linux RedHat 6.0 with
>
> the same netcard RealTek8019 but when i tried to compile the kernel i got
>
> the message
>
> make[1]:gcc:command not found
>
> make[1]:***[tkparse]Error 127
>
> make!***[xconfig]Error 2
>
> is any rpm i am missing there?
>
> Any help is welkomed.
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex)
Subject: What proxyserver should I use?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:59:14 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am running Redhat 6.0 and I would like to use my linux as a
proxyserver for ICQ and smtp mail.. any advice what proxy I should
use? Are there any Xwindow proxy's available yet?
Cheers,
Alex
--
Alex van Es, P.O. Box 698, 7300 AR Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
8 Webcams, doorbell, fridge, barcodescanner.. all connected to the internet.
Check http://www.icepick.com for details..
NEW! A Hyperwired cat.. http://www.blackie.com!
------------------------------
From: John O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Write errors via NFS with new Linux kernels 2.2.x/2.3.x
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:57:42 -0400
Indeed - I have the same problem. My 2.2.6,10,11 clients cannot do locking to
my 2.0.3x, and SCO OS5 servers. I wanted to upgrade my Slackware 3.5 web
server
to the Slackware 4.0 / Linux 2.2.11 kernel but I NEED to mount a SCO server
for
databases. I am thinking of upgrading to Slackware 3.9 which promises to
have
all the same features (glibc runtime, etc...) but still uses the 2.0 series
kernel.
Incidentally, I had started noticing this problem starting with a later 2.1
series
kernel. I can wait for NFS to get fixed in the 2.2/2.3 series, but I can't
wait long
before I will need large memory and SMP.... This web server is running our
business. I hope it gets fixed soon.
Johnny O
Paul Kirschner wrote:
> I've got the same problem using Debian 2.1 and linux_2.2.10. Both g77 and
> pgf77-compiled small test programs give segmentation faults on NFS mounted
> filesystems on AIX 4.3 and Solaris 2.5.1 machines. Things execute correctly
> on the local hard disk. Interestingly an NFS mounted disk on Solaris 7
> works properly!
>
> I really need an answer to this to continue promoting Linux in my company.
> If I cannot NFS-mount directories on other machines (as we do all over the
> place) the project is down the tubes.
>
> Michael Balser wrote:
> > Problem Summary:
> > Write errors occur when writing to nfs mounted partitions.
> >
> > Description:
> > I experienced frequent write errors when writing to an nfs mounted
> > partition on a Linux client using a SUN Solaris server. The write
> > errors occur only during special tasks, for example when
> > * compiling programs like 'mutt' (email client) using 'gcc', or
> > * compiling several Lisp sources using Allegro Common Lisp.
> > The resulting object files often (but not always) are corrupt.
> >
> > The problem seems to be related to nfs implementation in new Linux
> > kernels. With kernel version 2.0.36 this problem did not occur.
> >
> > Questions:
> > * Did someone already experience similar problems?
> > * How can this problem be solved?
> > * Are there known incompatibility problems between SUN NFS and new
> > Linux NFS?
> > * Could this problem be caused by changed file locking policy under
> > Linux?
> >
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
