Linux-Networking Digest #435, Volume #12          Wed, 1 Sep 99 06:13:40 EDT

Contents:
  Re: networking slows down ("William B. Cattell")
  Re: Looking for Ref:  Linux/NT/Win 95 Net ("William B. Cattell")
  Re: samba-2.0.5a ("Localhost")
  Re: Can't mount Windows drives (Cliff)
  Re: ftp problems ("tartaro")
  Re: ftp problems ("tartaro")
  Re: samba-2.0.5a (Cliff)
  Re: no telnet from outside (Robert)
  Trying to get IPX over PPP working. All I get is "Received bad    configure-ack" 
(Jeff Wiegley)
  Re: Problems with ISDN and Linux ("Frank Bauer")
  PPP hostnames vs IP (Rick)
  Re: PPP problem (georgik)
  Re: Compiling kernel (Johannes Ziegler)
  Re: Error message: tcp/telnet:unknown service (L J Bayuk)
  Re: RH 6.0, PPP, and my ISP ("David D. Shochat")
  how to reroute cisco to firewall? (Tim Downing)
  Re: suse-bootdisk (Bert Braun)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "William B. Cattell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: networking slows down
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 06:52:01 GMT

Janet wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have been recently been experiencing a problem with my networking
> slowing down.  If I ping my other machine, the ping time is normally less
> than 1 ms.  However, occasionally (it has happened 2 or 3 times in the
> last week), it becomes a lot slower, sometimes taking up to 30 ms.
> However, if I just restart networking (using the network startup script in
> /etc/rc.d/init.d), it goes back to the sub-1 time.  Any ideas?
> 
> Janet

Since you can clear up the situation by stopping and
restarting the card I would tend to think that either the
board is starting to go bad or you need a new driver. 

Bill
-- 
==============================================================
http://members.home.com/wcattell
==============================================================
Park not thy Harley in the darkness of thine garage, that it 
may collect dust for want of being oft ridden. Ride thy
Harley 
with thy brethren, and rejoice in the spirit of the road.
==============================================================

------------------------------

From: "William B. Cattell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Looking for Ref:  Linux/NT/Win 95 Net
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 06:46:16 GMT

RC wrote:
> 
> I am looking for information (FAQs, books, web pages, etc) that contain
> information on networking a Linux machine, NT 4.0 and Win 95.  This network
> will be for a small business that only acceses the internet etc through a
> modem.
> 
> Any suggestions to get me started would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Many thanks in advance.
> 
> Randy   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Take a look at;

http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/ They have all the HOWTOs you
need there.
-- 
==============================================================
http://members.home.com/wcattell
==============================================================
Park not thy Harley in the darkness of thine garage, that it 
may collect dust for want of being oft ridden. Ride thy
Harley 
with thy brethren, and rejoice in the spirit of the road.
==============================================================

------------------------------

From: "Localhost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba-2.0.5a
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 02:20:39 -0500

They have alot of tech and help files at http://www.samba.org

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7qhtmq$inh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all :)
> Recently I upgraded my samba suite from 2.0.3-8 to 2.0.5a and ever
> since my autoscript for smbmount stopped working.
>
> I've noticed there's a change in the smbmount syntax ...and I don;t
> seem to be able to make it mount w/o asking for the password. Before
> I'd do:
>
> smbmount \\\\server\\share PASSWORD -I x.x.x.x -U USERNAME -
> c 'mount /mountpoint'
>
> now the new smbmount gives me an incorrect  syntax error ...
> I just can't figure it out. Has anybody had the same issue ?
>
> Any comments would be truly appreciated!!
>
>
> Regards,
> Petar Karafezov
>
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



------------------------------

From: Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Re: Can't mount Windows drives
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:23:02 -0700

Hello Robert,

You mean you installed everything but can't locate it?
It should be /usr/bin/smbmount
Simply type "smbmount" without the quotes and see what you get..

Cliff

"Robert (Bob) McGwier" wrote:

> I can't find smbmount and I installed RH 6.0 with "ALL packages"
> selected.  Everything else in the samba configuration works.  Networked
> printers, and Windoze machines using samba based resources on the linux
> machines.  I just cannot mount my windoze directories on my linux machines.
> Is there a way to do this without smbmount and if not, why didn't RH 6.0
> install it?
>
> Bob
>
> Cliff wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes, in addition, you need to add another backslash before \c.
> > Backslash "\" means something in shell and many other scripting languages,
> > therefore, you need to escape it by adding another backslash.
> > I forgot to mention about the -N option, it's to disable password prompt.
> > So basically you can enter such line..
> > smbmount \\\\mypc\\c /mnt/win -N in your linuxconf so this will mount your
> > samba share at bootup. (assuming your win98 machine is always on)
> >
> > Cliff
> >
> > Hiawatha Bray wrote:
> >
> > > So...I'm supposed to put 2 more slashes before mypc?
> > >
> > > Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Try this..
> > > >
> > > > smbmount \\\\mypc\\c /mnt/win -N
> > > >
> > > > (make sure /mnt/win exists)
> > > >
> > > > Cliff
> > > >
> > > > Obs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > you should do smbmount ////computer-name/sharename /mount-point
> > > > >
> > > > > Hiawatha Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:7qcp4c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > I got my Samba working and I can mount my Linux drives on my Windows
> > > > > > machine.  Now...how do I do it the other way around, mounting Windows
> > > > > drives
> > > > > > on my Linux box?  I'm using RH 6 and Samba 2.0.3, withWin 98 on the
> > > > > Windows
> > > > > > machine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I created a /mnt/win mountpoint and then tried the smbmount command.
> > > > > Here's
> > > > > > what I got...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [root@linux watha]# smbmount file://mypc/c /mnt/win
> > > > > > Added interface ip=10.0.2.16 bcast=10.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0
> > > > > > Server time is Sun Aug 29 21:42:48 1999
> > > > > > Timezone is UTC-4.0
> > > > > > security=share
> > > > > > smb: \>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't even know what this means...is this the correct response?
> > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >



------------------------------

From: "tartaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ftp problems
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 21:55:29 -0400
Reply-To: "tartaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thank you very much

Joseph Santaniello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> My guess it that ftpd (and telnetd?) are trying to reverse map the ip
> addresses to names. Try adding dns entries and in-addr.arap entries for
> your internal network and see if that helps.
>
> Samba if it isn't using encrypted passwords (which it doesn't by
> default) requires that you enable "plain text" passwords for NT 4 sp3 or
> 98 or later versions of 95. You can enable them by running the registry
> mods found here:
>
> http://noram.cobaltnet.com/support/faqs/regchange.html
>
> these are from the makers of the Cobalt Qube. A super cool Linux
> implementation.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Joe
>
> tartaro wrote:
> >
> >     I have a Redhat 6.0 server running on my home network... the box is
a
> > AMD K6-200mhz, with 32 megs of ram, a 8gig maxtor, a one meg Cirrus
video
> > card (5430B). a realtek 8139 10/100 Mbps card. The internal network uses
> > 192.168 IP addressing scheme. This servers  address uses 192.168.1.2
(the
> > linux serve name is yoda). My NT server (the NT server name is Vallar)
> > address 192.168.1.1 . The NT server is the machine my client (they are
all
> > windows 98A e.g. second edition)  stations authenticate to, the client
> > stations are getting IP addresses from the NT server  which is running
DHCP
> > services. I have many deamons running on the server including
> > httpd
> > wu-ftpd
> > smb
> > nmb
> > sendmail
> >
> > and a few others that I can't remember... opps
> >
> > I'm having problems with ftp the services ... they lag terribly when I
try
> > to ftp to the server it often time out waiting for the welcome message.
> > (this lag happens reguardless of user eg it happens to root too).I am
able
> > to ping the server with out problem from anymachine on the lan .. from
linux
> > to windows and windows to linux. traceroute also works but it takes a
while
> > about 20 seconds (there is only one hop). I look and the inetd.conf file
and
> > the ftp.conf file but i can't seem to figure out the problem..
addtionally I
> > have samba running on the mahcine I can see it in network neighboorhood
but
> > when I try to acces/mount the the serve it prompts me for a password
nothing
> > seems to work .. I'm using the same user name with the same password for
> > allthings except when it is nesscary to operat as root! if I bring up
> > netscape and type in yoda. I can acess the server. Any info at all or
info
> > that can point me in the directiong of help would be greatly
appreciated.. I
> > have been using unc.metalab.edu as my reference point up until this
point I
> > also have the book redhat linux unleashed. I can ftp to my desktop which
is
> > running Serv-U ... UHGHHH PLEASE HELP!
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Matthew Tartaro
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: "tartaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ftp problems
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 20:59:36 -0400
Reply-To: "tartaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thank you very much

mt


Joseph Santaniello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> My guess it that ftpd (and telnetd?) are trying to reverse map the ip
> addresses to names. Try adding dns entries and in-addr.arap entries for
> your internal network and see if that helps.
>
> Samba if it isn't using encrypted passwords (which it doesn't by
> default) requires that you enable "plain text" passwords for NT 4 sp3 or
> 98 or later versions of 95. You can enable them by running the registry
> mods found here:
>
> http://noram.cobaltnet.com/support/faqs/regchange.html
>
> these are from the makers of the Cobalt Qube. A super cool Linux
> implementation.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Joe
>
> tartaro wrote:
> >
> >     I have a Redhat 6.0 server running on my home network... the box is
a
> > AMD K6-200mhz, with 32 megs of ram, a 8gig maxtor, a one meg Cirrus
video
> > card (5430B). a realtek 8139 10/100 Mbps card. The internal network uses
> > 192.168 IP addressing scheme. This servers  address uses 192.168.1.2
(the
> > linux serve name is yoda). My NT server (the NT server name is Vallar)
> > address 192.168.1.1 . The NT server is the machine my client (they are
all
> > windows 98A e.g. second edition)  stations authenticate to, the client
> > stations are getting IP addresses from the NT server  which is running
DHCP
> > services. I have many deamons running on the server including
> > httpd
> > wu-ftpd
> > smb
> > nmb
> > sendmail
> >
> > and a few others that I can't remember... opps
> >
> > I'm having problems with ftp the services ... they lag terribly when I
try
> > to ftp to the server it often time out waiting for the welcome message.
> > (this lag happens reguardless of user eg it happens to root too).I am
able
> > to ping the server with out problem from anymachine on the lan .. from
linux
> > to windows and windows to linux. traceroute also works but it takes a
while
> > about 20 seconds (there is only one hop). I look and the inetd.conf file
and
> > the ftp.conf file but i can't seem to figure out the problem..
addtionally I
> > have samba running on the mahcine I can see it in network neighboorhood
but
> > when I try to acces/mount the the serve it prompts me for a password
nothing
> > seems to work .. I'm using the same user name with the same password for
> > allthings except when it is nesscary to operat as root! if I bring up
> > netscape and type in yoda. I can acess the server. Any info at all or
info
> > that can point me in the directiong of help would be greatly
appreciated.. I
> > have been using unc.metalab.edu as my reference point up until this
point I
> > also have the book redhat linux unleashed. I can ftp to my desktop which
is
> > running Serv-U ... UHGHHH PLEASE HELP!
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Matthew Tartaro
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba-2.0.5a
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 01:12:39 -0700

Hello,

The -N option is to disable password.

Try this:

smbmount \\\\server\\share /mountpoint -N

Cliff

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hello all :)
> Recently I upgraded my samba suite from 2.0.3-8 to 2.0.5a and ever
> since my autoscript for smbmount stopped working.
>
> I've noticed there's a change in the smbmount syntax ...and I don;t
> seem to be able to make it mount w/o asking for the password. Before
> I'd do:
>
> smbmount \\\\server\\share PASSWORD -I x.x.x.x -U USERNAME -
> c 'mount /mountpoint'
>
> now the new smbmount gives me an incorrect  syntax error ...
> I just can't figure it out. Has anybody had the same issue ?
>
> Any comments would be truly appreciated!!
>
> Regards,
> Petar Karafezov
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



------------------------------

From: Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: no telnet from outside
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 08:20:54 GMT

Adam Bartels wrote:

> You need a static class c public address on the WAN side of your router. You
> then need to redirect telnet request to the IP of the local host. What IP
> are you trying to telnet to?
> --
> Adam J. Bartels
> Aegis Technology Systems
> Comm/Data Solutions That Work!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
>    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
> ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

I Know all of that!!. I know what a wan ip adress is! And i'am not trying to telnet
to 192.168.0.*.
I am trying to telnet to my wan ip adress!


------------------------------

From: Jeff Wiegley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Trying to get IPX over PPP working. All I get is "Received bad    
configure-ack"
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:53:47 -0700

I've read the IPX-HOWTO, the PPP HOWTO and everything else I could get
my
hands on and I've just plain run out of ideas.

I've got a single network of win95/98 workstations, a linux server for
PPP dialup access and a Novell Netware server which supplies files for
the Win9X boxes.  I'm interested in getting dialup machines to be able
totransparently use the Novel file server as though they were on the
local network.

Its a RedHat 5.2 system with a 2.2.12 kernel and PPP v2.3.5 with
(I think) IPX_CHANGE specified as the SRPM seems to indicate that's
the way RedHat built it.

I've compiled the kernel with IPX and have the ipx.o module loaded.
I've also got the eth0 interface setup as the primary ipx interface.
All that seems to go smoothly:
   [root@server /tmp]# /sbin/ifconfig
   lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
             inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
             UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3924  Metric:1
             RX packets:69 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
             TX packets:69 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
             collisions:0 

   eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:C9:3E:C6:17  
             inet addr:192.168.10.1  Bcast:192.168.10.255 
Mask:255.255.255.0
             IPX/Ethernet 802.2 addr:784EFF00:00A0C93EC617
             UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
             RX packets:306 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
             TX packets:130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
             collisions:0 
             Interrupt:9 Base address:0xe400 

I also have ipxripd up and running:
   [root@server /tmp]# cat /proc/net/ipx_route 
   Network    Router_Net   Router_Node
   784EFF00   Directly     Connected

I've also got PPP configured correctly and dialup users can establish
a connection without any problems using the normal TCP/IP configuration.

However, now I've added the following to /etc/ppp/options{.ttyS0}:
  asyncmap 0
  lock
  crtscts
  modem
  ms-dns 192.168.10.1
  ms-wins 192.168.10.1
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  passive
  proxyarp
  idle 300
  ipxcp-accept-network
  ipxcp-accept-remote
  ipxcp-accept-local

  192.168.10.7:192.168.10.8
  ipx
  ipx-network 0x784EFF00
  ipx-node 2:0

(I've had a few other options specified but they don't change the
problem I'm having.)

So now on to the problem:
  The client dialup box is a Windows98 box and it has a dialup
  adapter, Network client and IPX protocol bound to the dialup
  adapter.

When I dialup the linux server a PPP connection is established but
/etc/ppp/ipx_up never gets run and /var/log/messages has these
tidbits in it:

Sep  1 00:41:47 server kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070043
Sep  1 00:41:47 server kernel: PPP BSD Compression module registered
Sep  1 00:41:47 server kernel: PPP Deflate Compression module registered
Sep  1 00:41:47 server pppd[623]: Received bad configure-ack:  01 06 78
4e ff 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 02
Sep  1 00:41:47 server kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f0700c3
Sep  1 00:41:47 server pppd[623]: CCP terminated by peer
Sep  1 00:41:47 server kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070043
Sep  1 00:41:47 server pppd[623]: Compression disabled by peer.
Sep  1 00:41:50 server pppd[623]: Received bad configure-ack:  01 06 78
4e ff 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 02
Sep  1 00:42:14 server last message repeated 8 times
Sep  1 00:42:17 server pppd[623]: IPXCP: timeout sending Config-Requests


What does "Received bad configure-ack:  01 06..." mean and how do I get
it to go away?  I think this error message is crucial and related to
why the IPX over PPP never comes up.

What configuration item am I missing that is causing this problem?

Also... Why does the peer disable compression and how can I get it to
allow compression.

Thanks for any help anyone can offer,

Jeff Wiegley

------------------------------

From: "Frank Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with ISDN and Linux
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 10:21:15 +0200

> i�m running SuSe 6.1 and have set my defaultroute to ippp0. I want, that
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-------- Masquerading modules installed??? (not included
by original SuSE Distribution V 6.1)!!!!
> only specified users/maschines have the possibility to create a
> connection...HOW?


HTH
Frank



------------------------------

From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP hostnames vs IP
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 07:31:03 GMT

Hi,
   I'm pretty new to Linux and am still getting my box up and running.  I 
have finally solved the problem of dialing my ISP successfully and now am 
just tangling with the issue of accessing the web.  I can ping localhost 
and 205.188.247.66 (www.netscape.com) fine, but when I try pinging 
www.netscape.com itself, it can't find the host.  I can open up the IP in 
Netscape as well, but IP addresses only, not hostnames.
   My /etc/ppp/options file is as follows:
      lock
      domain pacbell.net
      ipcp-accept-remote
      ipcp-accept-local
      crtscts
      defaultroute
      debug
      modem
      /dev/ttyS0
      115200
      noipdefault
      user rpez021

   My /etc/hosts file has this:
      107.0.0.1     localhost  localhost.domain.net
   
   Incidentally, I get no errors per se, and I have no resolv.conf file 
anywhere, so the references I've seen to that in various postings are lost 
on me.  Please help if you can!  And thanks a lot!

==================  Posted via CNET Linux Help  ==================
                    http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: georgik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP problem
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 01:46:50 -0700

Put the following lines in your /etc/conf.modules file:

ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate
ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate


Regards,
        Georgi

test wrote:

> I am trying to connect to a new ISP.  Everything seems to be going fine
> until after the connection is made.  Here is the output in my syslog of
> what happens on the connect.
>
> Aug 30 15:36:57 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: Serial connection established.
> Aug 30 15:36:57 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: Using interface ppp0
> Aug 30 15:36:57 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> Aug 30 15:36:59 SUNA_ENT4 modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
> Aug 30 15:36:59 SUNA_ENT4 modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-26
> Aug 30 15:36:59 SUNA_ENT4 modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-24
> Aug 30 15:37:29 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: IPCP: timeout sending
> Config-Requests
> Aug 30 15:37:29 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: Connection terminated.
> Aug 30 15:37:29 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: Connect time 0.6 minutes.
> Aug 30 15:37:30 SUNA_ENT4 pppd[1922]: Exit.
>
> I don't know what IPCP does or why it would time out with this ISP.
>
> Any information would be appreciated.
>
> David Suna
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Address:

Georgi Kostadinov
Dept. Computer Science
University of Victoria
P.O.Box 3055
Victoria, BC
CANADA  V8W 3P6

Web Home Page: http://www.csc.uvic.ca/~georgik



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 10:16:33 +0200
From: Johannes Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.dev.config,linux.dev.newbie
Subject: Re: Compiling kernel

Jimmy wrote:

> 1. could u describe what's the difference between 'make zImage' and 'make
> bzImage'? or just send me the URL for this info.
>
> 2. do u know what 's the problem is with the following err msg at the end of
> kernel compilation?  i got the err, "System is 525k, System is too big. Try using
> bzImage"
> Thank u very much!
>
> Johnny Chen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Johannes Ziegler wrote:
>
> > make dep ;   make bzImage  (because zImage is out of date)
> > make modules ; make modules_install
> >
> > Then you should copy the new kernel and also the corresponding System.map
> > to /boot/vmlinuz-<kernel-version+revision> and
> > /boot/System.map-<kernel-version+revision>.
> > Configure /etc/lilo.conf by hand  (so you can still use the old kernel).
> > Call lilo and reboot to try the new kernel.
> > You can remove the old kernel later (don't forget to update lilo).
> >
> > Good luck!
> > Johannes Ziegler
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (feedback always welcome)

I don't know exactly the difference between bzImage and zImage.
Both are compressed kernel images.
The bzImage is usually smaller than the zImage (this is important,
because the kernel is limited to some size).
I think lilo can handle the bzImages better than the zImages (relocating and stuff),

therefore it's recommended to use the bzImages.

Best regards
Johannes Ziegler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(feedback always welcome)


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: Error message: tcp/telnet:unknown service
Date: 31 Aug 1999 23:49:25 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello all:
>
>Has anyone seen this error message before?
>
>    telnet: tcp/telnet: uknown service
>
>I receive this message *only* as an ordinary user on a RH 6.0 machine.
>Telnet works fine as root.
>The machine can accept telnet connections from another computer.
>All the other services, such as www and ftp, work fine for the user
>account.
>
>There is nothing changed, or misconfigured (as far as I can tell), in
>/etc/services or inetd.conf.
>
>Any help / suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Make sure /etc/services is readable to everyone (e.g. -rw-r--r--).

------------------------------

From: "David D. Shochat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH 6.0, PPP, and my ISP
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 05:46:31 -0400

Josh Thompson wrote:
> 
> I am trying to connect to my ISP (Intrex in Raleigh, NC).  They don't
> officially support linux, but have several users connecting with it.  I
> have tried everything I can think of.  I have set up the connection with
> RedHat's netcfg, using scripts, connecting with minicom and then
> starting pppd after exiting, and a few other methods.  I am using PAP.

[snip]

> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000>
> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 0b 01 52 61 6c 53 74 61
> 63 6b>]
> sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <auth pap> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13
> 0b 01 52 61 6c 53 74 61 63 6b>]

It looks like your side is rejecting the use of PAP. When I had that
problem it was due to a naming problem. Take a look at your pap-secrets
file. The first field in the relevant line is your "peer-id". That
almost certainly has to match your "user name" from your ISP's point of
view, but it must also either match your hostname *or* be named in a
name or user option in your pppd options. For example, my computer
hostname is prilep although my "user name" at my ISP is shochat.
Therefore, I *must* say

  user shochat

in my options or else my side will reject the use of PAP. Like all pppd
options, it can go either in the pppd command line or in the options
file.

Just a hunch, but it matches your symptom.

-- David

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Downing)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Subject: how to reroute cisco to firewall?
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 09:17:18 GMT

I have been using a Cisco ISDN router for some time as our internet
gateway.

Have just installed a dedicated firewall machine, and I suppose I need
to change the routing table on my Cisco.

The problem is I have only 1 class C and the Cisco won't let me do
what I think I need to do -- hopefully I've got it wrong and someone
can guide me.

current configuration (no subnetting at all):
ethernet 0
ip address 203.19.6.1 255.255.255.0

need to route the class C to 203.19.6.2 which is connected on ethernet
0.

Any suggestions welcome.

Regards,
Tim.

=================
Tim Downing
Systems Manager
Touchstone Colour
Perth, Australia

------------------------------

From: Bert Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: suse-bootdisk
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:12:22 +0200



> sorry if being off-topic, but can anyone tell me how to re-create an
> original bootdisk for suse-linux ?

You will find the images of various boot kernels on the first CD in
/images. See the readme in /images for details.
To write an image to a floppy under DOS you�ll need the rawrite utility
which resides on the first CD in /dosutils/rawrite. A readme file
describing the syntax of rawrite is also located there.


Ciao...Bert

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to