Linux-Networking Digest #444, Volume #12 Wed, 1 Sep 99 22:13:44 EDT
Contents:
VB 6.0 ADO won't talk to PostgreSQL driver (Phil)
Re: PPP DNS problem (Alan J. Wylie)
FTP security ("Aaron Thomason")
Linux friendly ISPs (ksvenbak)
Re: PPP DNS problem (Clifford Kite)
Re: SAMBA? What else? See if you can figure this one out..... ("John W. Rose")
Re: ipchains ICMP forging? (Bayee)
printing from linux box to appletalk printer (Pete Hurd)
Re: PPP sending but not receiving packets? (Clifford Kite)
Re: Network card - newbie (Eric L. Schott)
ASCII connection not allowed to my ISP with pppd connection (Richard Meijn)
UDP pkts on port 2348 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
connecting Linux 5.2 and Win98 ("Ron Medrozo")
Re: printing from linux box to appletalk printer (Rod Smith)
Re: Communication needed between linux server/client to windows (Tom Eastep)
Re: Can an ISP detect masquerading? (The Dude)
Re: NMB fails at boot. (Roger)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,redhat.general
Subject: VB 6.0 ADO won't talk to PostgreSQL driver
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:31:04 GMT
I'm running Red Hat 5.2 with PostgreSQL and a small database. I've
downloaded the PostgreSQL driver from the Postgres web site and installed
it into ODBC (32 bit) without any problems. In VB 6.0, I'm trying to use
ADOdc to retrieve the data in the PostgreSQL database via the driver, but I
continue to receive the error message 'ADO cannot find the specified
provider.' I've set up a UserDSN datasource, and have referenced that as
the ODBC datasource in the ADOdc properties. The userid, password, DBname
are also specified.
Is additional code required? If so, what? Help!
Phil
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan J. Wylie)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP DNS problem
Date: 01 Sep 1999 21:27:27 +0100
georgik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have problem with my ISPs DNS. I can connect OK and ping some IPs,
> e.g. ping 137.82.43.58, but when I try to ping my ISPs DNS
> IP=198.133.036.9,
> I get nothing?! I contacted my ISP and they told me that in the login
> history
> there's something about my machine thinking that it was a LAN
> connection??!
[snip]
* Why is there a 0 in the third octet?
* It is likely that your ping is interpreting it as an octal number.
$ ping 198.133.036.9
PING 198.133.036.9 (198.133.30.9): 56 data bytes
^^^ ^^
* Note that 36 octal = 30 decimal
$ ping 198.133.36.9
PING 198.133.36.9 (198.133.36.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 198.133.36.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=233 time=273.0 ms
64 bytes from 198.133.36.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=233 time=500.0 ms
--- 198.133.36.9 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 273.0/386.5/500.0 ms
$ ping 198.133.036.9
PING 198.133.036.9 (198.133.30.9): 56 data bytes
--- 198.133.036.9 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
$ nslookup
Default Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
> server 198.133.36.9
Default Server: ns1.ican.net
Address: 198.133.36.9
> 198.133.36.9
Server: ns1.ican.net
Address: 198.133.36.9
Name: ns1.ican.net
Address: 198.133.36.9
* Looks like the 0 is your problem.
--
Alan J. Wylie http://www.glaramara.freeserve.co.uk
My e-mail address should _not_ be modified.
Build a system that even an idiot can use,
and only an idiot will want to use it
------------------------------
From: "Aaron Thomason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTP security
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 15:53:06 -0500
How do I restrict a user to their home directory when they ftp into my site?
------------------------------
From: ksvenbak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux friendly ISPs
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 16:06:11 GMT
Does anyone know where I can find a list of Internet Service Providers
that support dial-in using linux?
K
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP DNS problem
Date: 1 Sep 1999 15:24:21 -0500
georgik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have problem with my ISPs DNS. I can connect OK and ping some IPs,
: e.g. ping 137.82.43.58, but when I try to ping my ISPs DNS
: IP=198.133.036.9,
[Edited]
The connection looked good.
:
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: I have the following lines in my /etc/resolv.conf file:
: nameserver 198.133.036.9
: nameserver 198.133.036.8
These should be
nameserver 198.133.36.9
nameserver 198.133.36.8
The leading zero of an octet is not allowed.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* A salute to Inspector Baynes, of the Surry Constabulary, the only
police Inspector to ever best Mr. Sherlock Holmes at his own game.
"The Adventure of Wisteria Lodge", by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. */
------------------------------
From: "John W. Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SAMBA? What else? See if you can figure this one out.....
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:34:39 -0500
Two RH60 boxes running Samba, total of four hd shares, three cd shares,
and a zip drive share, one box as an internet gateway...
One Win95 notebook, one folder shared...
One Win98 box, one folder shared...
I can see and access the shares between the 95 & 98 boxes...
I can see the two Rh60 boxes in 95's & 98's
network neighborhood but cannot connect to the RH60 boxes
from the 98 box. I get an ``incorrect password'' error message...
I'm using the same username/password combo on all four boxes...
The RH60 shares work fine from the 95 notebook...
IP masquerading works fine from both the 95 & 98 boxes...
So is there some bug with Win98 networking and Samba?
Gregory Kraft wrote:
> Maybe someone can help me. I have Win98 on a pc downstairs. My pc is
> upstairs and is running win95/redhat linux 2.2.9. I can network via cat5 cable
> and two ne2000 comp. ethernet cards with ipx driver win95/win98 But I would
> like to see if I can connect to the win98 system downstairs via linux. Do I
> use Samba for this? What would be the steps to do this. I looked at the ipx
> howtoo and the samba howtoo but there not clear to me what to do in this
> peticular situation.
>
> I'm not looking for a step by step...but if you could generally point me or
> tell me the direction to go, it would be greatly appreciated!!
>
> regards
> Greg
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 01:11:17 +0800
From: Bayee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipchains ICMP forging?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ipchains allows me to easily DROP or REJECT packets that are destined
> for a down-stream host, but the REJECT action sends an ICMP port
> unreachable packet back FROM THE FIREWALL HOST. Is it possible to habe
> ipchains forge the response so that it appears to be the target system
> that is rejecting the packet?
>
> The key here is that I don't want a casual port-scan to reveal the
> presense of the filtering system.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
I think you can use "-j DENY" instead of "-j REJECT" option (if I
understand your question right).
------------------------------
From: Pete Hurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: printing from linux box to appletalk printer
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 13:50:47 -0500
Hello world,
I'm trying to print from a linux box to an appletalk printer, (I've
gotten
smb-printing down, but the dept has decided that all printing shall
henceforth be apple...)
The Printing-HOWTO says to see the Netatalk-HOWTO,
The Netatalk-HOWTO says not to use Netatalk, but to use afpfs which
works under 1.3 kernels, but under 2.2 it's pre-alpha (!?)
I can insmod appletalk fine, but from there how do I go about printing?
Can anyone show me a printcap that uses the appletalk shtick?
Cheers,
-P.
--
Pete Hurd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.zo.utexas.edu/research/phurd
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin TX 78712 USA
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP sending but not receiving packets?
Date: 1 Sep 1999 13:39:08 -0500
Ellis Pritchard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: You wrote:
: > Try adding asyncmap a0000 to the pppd options. The ZyXel TA may
: > be causing a problem with xon/off flow control. Pure guess though,
: > I don't use a ZyXel.
: Tried it, and with xonxoff specified instead of crtscts, no change...
OK, then try setting the pppd option kdebug 7 and get hexdumps of outgoing
and incoming packets. A half-dozen pings should help to see what's going
on but limit the quantity dumped to a reasonable number. You should be
able to compare the RX packets with the TX packets and see where they
differ, which might suggest what's going on.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife.
Use =} to wrap paragraphs in vi. */
------------------------------
From: Eric L. Schott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network card - newbie
Date: 01 Sep 1999 15:42:36 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Fredlein) writes:
> Eventually I want to run the Linux box as a file server for my NT box
> and my Mac. Is AppleTalk automatically included? (if I ever get it to
> see my card).
Partially.
In /etc/rc.d/rc.modules, include the line
modprobe appletalk
You will also need to fetch, build, and install "netatalk." The
NET-3-HOWTO contains information on doing this. I have just started
this. I do have printing working now. That is a Mac can print on the
printer on my Linux box.
Eric.
------------------------------
From: Richard Meijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ASCII connection not allowed to my ISP with pppd connection
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:48:34 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=A0
Hello,
I have the following problem with the pppd deamon.
When I connect to my SP I see in the messages file that
the connection is astablised but then he is rejected by the
SP with the description
This is the message in the message file
Aug 23 00:16:18 panda chat[928]: send (ATDT5479333^M)
Aug 23 00:16:18 panda chat[928]: expect (CONNECT)
Aug 23 00:16:18 panda chat[928]: ^M
Aug 23 00:16:48 panda chat[928]: ATDT5479333^M^M
Aug 23 00:16:48 panda chat[928]: CONNECT
Aug 23 00:16:48 panda chat[928]:=A0 -- got it
Aug 23 00:16:48 panda chat[928]: send (^M)
Aug 23 00:16:48 panda chat[928]: expect (ogin:)
Aug 23 00:16:48 panda chat[928]:
115200/V90/LAPM/V42BIS/28800:TX/49333:RX^M
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: ^M
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]:
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda last message repeated 23 times
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: ** Ascend TNT Terminal Server **^M
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: ^M
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: ^M
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: Login:
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]:=A0 -- got it
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: send (rameijn^M)
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: expect (ord:)
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]:=A0 rameijn^M
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: Password:
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]:=A0 -- got it
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: send (Bon88zHj^M)
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: timeout set to 5 seconds
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]: expect (~)
Aug 23 00:16:54 panda chat[928]:=A0 ^M
Aug 23 00:16:55 panda chat[928]: Ascii toegang niet toegestaan
Aug 23 00:16:55 panda chat[928]: ^M
I could not astablis a connection with ASCII.
This is my ppp-on script:
exec /usr/sbin/pppd debug lock modem crtscts /dev/modem 115200 \
=A0escape FF defaultroute domain wxs.nl hide-password idle 600=A0 kdebug =
0 \
=A0noipdefault netmask $NETMASK defaultroute connect $DIALER_SCRIPT
=A0
This is my chat script:
#!/bin/sh -x
#
# This is part 2 of the ppp-on script. It will perform the connection
# protocol for the desired connection.
#
exec chat -v=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 \
=A0TIMEOUT=A0 3=A0=A0=A0 \
=A0ABORT=A0 '\nBUSY\r'=A0=A0 \
=A0ABORT=A0 '\nNO ANSWER\r'=A0=A0 \
=A0ABORT=A0 '\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r' \
=A0''=A0 \rAT=A0=A0=A0 \
=A0'OK-+++\c-OK' ATH0=A0=A0=A0 \
=A0TIMEOUT=A0 30=A0=A0=A0 \
=A0OK=A0 ATDT$TELEPHONE=A0=A0 \
=A0CONNECT=A0 ''=A0=A0=A0 \
=A0ogin:--ogin: $ACCOUNT=A0=A0 \
=A0assword: $PASSWORD
Who could help me a little more furter.
=A0
--
=A0
Kind Regards,
Richard Meijn, e-mail : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Consultant
Quant Systems Europe bv.=A0 ( http://www.quantsystems.nl )
Zuiderkade 7
1948 NG Beverwijk=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Tel : +31 (0)251 268268 Fax : +=
31 (0)251
268269
=A0
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP pkts on port 2348
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:15:37 GMT
I'm seeing a strange UDP packet hitting mu PPP interface roughly every
second and it's keeping my line up when not otherwise in use. It looks
like this:
[root@serv /root]# tcpdump udp -i ppp0 | grep 2348
tcpdump: listening on ppp0
21:40:09.965909 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:11.235882 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:12.165895 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:13.255895 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:14.365902 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:15.485881 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:16.565895 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:17.665869 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:18.765868 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:19.865886 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
21:40:20.965881 38.30.38.153.2348 > 38.30.38.153.2348: udp 29
547 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
It's wierd because 38.30.38.153 is the address of my PPP interface:
[root@serv /root]# ifconfig ppp0
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:38.30.38.153 P-t-P:38.1.1.1 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1524 Metric:1
RX packets:56720 errors:646 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:646
TX packets:60603 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
I've got an updated RH5.2 setup running PPP via an external ISDN line,
feeding a few Win98/Linux boxes. My ipchains stuff looks like this:
[from /etc/rc.d/rc.local]------------------------------------------
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr
# flush all rules
ipchains -F
# default policy: deny forwarding
ipchains -P forward DENY
# do not forward Windows garbage
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 0.0.0.0/0 137:139 -p tcp -j DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 0.0.0.0/0 137:139 -p udp -j DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 0.0.0.0/0 2348:2348 -p udp -j DENY
ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 172.16.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
ipmasqadm portfw -f
# Startup PPP networking
pppd /dev/ttyS0 :208.137.248.4
=======================================================================
The third DENY statement is to kill those packets but it hasn't worked.
I've tried fuser and netstat to no avail. I've even looked up port 2348
and apart from a resource tracking prog called RTS (not on my machine),
nothing is registered to use port 2348. I'm gettin' worried!
Has anyone seen this before or can help? Thanks in advance
~Tim
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Ron Medrozo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: connecting Linux 5.2 and Win98
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 20:00:32 -0500
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I would like to ask your assistance regarding on how to network a Linux 5.2
and Windows98. I have to PCs with each OS. I want to enable file and print
sharing on them and also be able to see each other. I have configured TCPIP
and they are both in Ethernet. I appreciate the help that you can extend.
Please reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you all...
Ron
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: printing from linux box to appletalk printer
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 01:25:19 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Pete Hurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello world,
>
> I'm trying to print from a linux box to an appletalk printer, (I've
> gotten
> smb-printing down, but the dept has decided that all printing shall
> henceforth be apple...)
>
> The Printing-HOWTO says to see the Netatalk-HOWTO,
> The Netatalk-HOWTO says not to use Netatalk, but to use afpfs which
> works under 1.3 kernels, but under 2.2 it's pre-alpha (!?)
>
> I can insmod appletalk fine, but from there how do I go about printing?
> Can anyone show me a printcap that uses the appletalk shtick?
The easiest way is to use pap, which comes with Netatalk. You can use pap
in place of lpr. This does NOT send print jobs through the Linux print
spool, though. If you want to use a Linux print spool, you can use psf in
the if= line of your /etc/printcap to send the print jobs through pap
AFTER they've gone through the Linux print queue, the result being that
you can use lpr to print locally (or export the printer via some other
protocol, if you like). After you've installed Netatalk and its man
pages, try typing "man psf" and "man pap" for more information.
afpfs is support for Mac FILESYSTEMS. You *DO NOT* need this for
PRINTING. If you want to access Mac files from Linux, afpfs is (in
theory) one option, but as you say, its own web page says it's
unreliable. Setting up a Mac ftp server would be a better option.
--
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.bellatlantic.net/~smithrod
Author of _Special Edition Using Corel WordPerfect 8 for Linux_, from Que
------------------------------
From: Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Communication needed between linux server/client to windows
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 01:05:20 +0000
Long,
Long Ta wrote:
>
> Dear Linux Pros,
>
> I want my linux system see the window 98 file system, but don't know how.
> Is there any windows Linux service program or equivalent program out there
> that windows can serve files to a Linux machine.
You need to use Samba; your distribution undoubtedly includes it. It's a
bit complicated to get set up but works well once you've mastered it.
>
> My window cannot log into my Linux neither. I was able to run telnet and
> connect to the linux system using the IP address. The prompt comes up
> nicely, but the login is refused saying password is incorrect as I try to
> log in as root.
I recommend against logging in directly as root via telnet. Rather, log
in as another user then use 'su'. Your system is a bit more secure that
way. If you persist in wanting to log in as root directly, "man
securetty".
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ are my own and not
Shoreline, Washington USA \ those of my employer
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \________________________
------------------------------
From: The Dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can an ISP detect masquerading?
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:35:27 -0400
How exactly the ports in the range 60000-65535 are used ?
When one of my masqueraded client pass through Linux to go on
www.someplace.com his ip is changed with the real one.
Now my question is the port source and dest remain the same ?
-If yes from where those higher ports appear on outside
-If not and that's mean that the dest port get translated to 60000...
how come it can connect to server listening only on port 80 ?
The Dude
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:07:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank v Waveren)
wrote:
>In article <7q285n$dtj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Tom Verbeure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>> a tech-guy of my ISP claims that they are able to detect a host running
>>> Linux IP masquerading (and, of course, that it is forbidden by their
>>> policy to use this.) Is this true? Are there network expert here who can
>>> comment on this?
>>
>> This sounds like bullcrap. How would they know? When you masquerade, Linux
>> just opens a new port on your box on the Internet side and notes that it is
>> a masquerade port. The receiving side has no idea whether this port is a
>> masquerade port or not. Also, there is nothing in an IPv4 packet that says
>> the box is using masquerading. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>You're right. There are some oddities that at least suggest ip masqing may
>be used, like the fact that ports 60000-65535 are much used, but nothing they
>can use as proof. BTW, I doubt they have any legal base here, because it's
>practicly impossible to define what 1 comp is. Is a SMP system 1 comp? Is a
>beowulf cluster 1 comp? You should be fine as long as you don't go selling
>the connection to others.
>
>#include <IANAL.h>
------------------------------
From: Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NMB fails at boot.
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 20:17:01 -0500
Sean Armstrong wrote:
>
> When I boot my computer, NMB services fail but SMB services boots ok. I am
> using Mandrake 6.0 on my computer with their most up to date samba rpm.
> Because of this problem I can't see my Linux box on the company
> etwork( which is NT) but I can communicate with another Linux box also on
> the company network. Any ideas?
> Thanx,
> SA
I had that same problem, check you /etc/smb.conf files and check to see
what order your name resolution is set to. Thats your problem - now as
to fix it I have a half ass way to fix it.
In my smb/conf file the resolution order is
name resolve order = lmhosts hosts bcast wins
hereis a copy of my lmhosts file and hosts file - you'll need to edit
those to corespond to each computer on your network. I encourage you to
search to a better solution for this, as every computer thats put on or
taken off will require a edit in the lmhosts file
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
192.168.0.2 lich
192.168.0.3 tester
192.168.0.4 pete
/etc/lmhosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
localhost lich
tester tester
pete pete
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
