Linux-Networking Digest #445, Volume #12 Thu, 2 Sep 99 00:13:36 EDT
Contents:
Quick question 3C509B ("CNT")
Re: Firewalling Question ("John Hardin")
Re: Bad ICMP response on 2nd eth. interface ("Robert_Glover")
Qmail mail server??? ("William D. Wilmoth")
Re: 2 computers and internet (Morely Dotes)
Re: Win98 -> Red Hat problem (Jerry Craker)
Re: local routing ("Tobias Knowles")
Re: Masquerading + Samba? ("Tobias Knowles")
Help!!! Nt and Linux networking ("Ron Medrozo")
What's IPv6 status? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WANT: network "datascope" for linux/open-source ("Dan St.Andre'")
Re: What's IPv6 status? (Kyle Hargraves)
Re: Can an ISP detect masquerading? (Tom Eastep)
thorny proxy / dial on demand / email question... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ppp not working anymore (Brandon)
DNS/Firewall (crux)
BRAZIL: Estagio Linux em SP (text in Portuguese) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Browsers and Linux ("Jim Ross")
Re: Linux friendly ISPs ("Todd K. Tuttle")
Need help deciphering an NFS error message (Seth Rothberg)
Re: Autodialing PPP Gateway? ("Scott Simpson")
Re: Browsers and Linux ("Jim Ross")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "CNT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Quick question 3C509B
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 19:22:05 -0700
Hi,
Will Linux RedHat 6.0 support the 3Com 3C509B NIC. I only found information
regarding a 3C509, or IS it the same. I tought they are different...?
Thanks in advance,
Marty
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewalling Question
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 09:54:51 -0700
Patrick Finnegan wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have set up an IPmasq firewall and am wondering if there is a way i
>can redirect a port on the firewall machine to a port on a machine that
>is behind the IPmasq firewall. Thanks much!
>
>Patrick Finnegan
You want ipportfw.
In 2.0.x it's a kernel patch and a control tool, in 2.2.x it's built into
the kernel patch and ipmasqadm controls it.
If you need the 2.0.x patch try looking on freshmeat, or take a look at
http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/ip_masq_vpn.html for a link to the
ipportfw home page.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight...
Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
------------------------------
From: "Robert_Glover" <Please_reply_to@newsgroup>
Subject: Re: Bad ICMP response on 2nd eth. interface
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:19:25 -0000
Does taking eth1 down and bringing up back up with ifconfig improve
the situation?
I have similar symptoms, and that usually helps me. I would like to
know how to make it go away permanantly though. BTW I'm using a
firewall too. I wonder if that has something to do with it?
Jean-Fran�ois GOBBERS wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello, happy Linuxers,
>
>
>I'm trying to set up a firewall + masquerading, but net traffic on my
>second card looks weird...
>
>MB: EP-MVP3G
>
>CPUs: 2 x PII (deschutes) @ 392MHz
>
>PCI devices:
>...
>00:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX
>[Boomerang]
>00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
21140
>[FasterNet] (rev 22)
>with interrupts (from /proc/interrupts):
>17: 898 891 IO-APIC-level eth0, eth1
>
>The network routes are (from netstat -r):
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use
>Iface
>xxx.xxx.236.128 * 255.255.255.128 U 0 0
0
>eth0
>192.168.1.128 * 255.255.255.128 U 0 0
0
>eth1
>loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
0
>lo
>default xxx.xxx.236.254 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0
0
>eth0
>
>Now, pinging a machine on the subnet accessible through the first
NIC:
> PING xxx.xxx.236.227 (xxx.xxx.236.227): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.236.227: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.7 ms
> 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.236.227: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=1.2 ms
> 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.236.227: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.4 ms
> 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.236.227: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.4 ms
> 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.236.227: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=1.4 ms
> 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.236.227: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms
> --- xxx.xxx.236.227 ping statistics ---
> 6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 0.3/0.7/1.4 ms
>and a machine on the second one:
> PING 192.168.1.130 (192.168.1.130): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=8686.3
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=7694.2
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=6694.4
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=5694.6
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=4694.8
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=3694.9
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=2695.0
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=1695.2
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=695.4 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=1052.2
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=51.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=1805.4
ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=805.6
ms
> --- 192.168.1.130 ping statistics ---
> 14 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 7% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 51.2/3535.3/8686.3 ms
>
>I actually tested this on 2.2.9 and 2.2.12 with different configs,
used
>different hubs/cables/NICs/{other machines} configs, and I always get
>the same result. Additionally, I didn't find anything relevant in the
>static/dynamic docs. What have I missed ?
>
>
>Thanks for your patience!
>
>
>JF
>
>
>--
>GOBBERS Jean-Fran�ois - researcher -------------------
>Universit� Catholique de Louvain | .~. |
> UCL/FSA/ELEC/TELE | /V\ LINUX |
> UCL/FS/PHYS/FYMA | // \\ |
>Tel : +32-10-478546 | /( )\ INSIDE |
>Fax : +32-10-472089 | ^^-^^ |
>e-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------
------------------------------
From: "William D. Wilmoth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Qmail mail server???
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:52:18 -0500
Hi all,
I am attempting to set up a mail server to do the following:
1. Download all of corporate mail i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Filter messages down to each individuals mailbox.
3. Enable users to download their messages from Winblows 98 or our
As400.
4. Send mail inside the company. (from windows and 400).
5. Send mail to the outside world.
I am running RH6.0 and I was told by a colleague that Qmail was the way to
go for ease of operation as well as great security. So, I just doe right in.
At this point I can send mail within my Linux box. (user to user). I can
send mail up to my Linux box from widows. And I can send mail up to the web
from my linux box, but I can't get mail down from the net, nor can I get my
mail from the Linux box down to windows.
I am running smtp, qmtp, and pop3 with tcpserver. Have I just overlooked
some configurations on the POP3? and how do I set up the queue to download
all new mail periodically?
I send thanks in advance for any help, and apologies for my lack of
knowledge.
Thanks,
William D. Wilmoth
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Morely Dotes)
Crossposted-To:
comp.networks,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.ras,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows
Subject: Re: 2 computers and internet
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 21:07:14 GMT
Reply-To: Secret Master of the Internet Cabal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Hahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>How would you compare WinNAT and Sygate?
Christopher, I answered you in email. *Please* don't post *and* email. One
or the other, not both.
--
Know Nyarlathotep; Know Chaos
My other vehicle is a Migo Brain Cylinder
[There is no Lumber Cartel, but if there were, I'd be Unit 34]
------------------------------
From: Jerry Craker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 -> Red Hat problem
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 17:24:11 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One possible problem that I have seen is if you are using a DNS server that it
can't reach. It will time out trying to resolve DNS host names, to see if you
are authorized or not.
The only other time I have seen this problem is if the system is extremely
busy, or the network is. However, take a look at your DNS first. It might not
be the problem, but then again, --- it might :-)
-- Jerry --
David Guerizec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: GreGo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 4:41 AM
> Subject: Win98 -> Red Hat problem
>
> > I can't login from Win98 to Linux by telnet. Ftp doesn't work too. When
> > I trie to login telnet says "conected" but didn't shows welcome screen.
> > Thanks
> > Grego
> >
>
> well, in fact I don't know the answer to your question, but I know it works.
> unfortunatly, I made it work a few weeks ago, but I changed many thing in my
> config, and now it won't anymore...
> I have now a very similar problem as yours.
>
> my config:
> Linux Red-Hat 6.0 with two NICs (eth0->internet and eth1->local network)
> IPMasq config
>
> when I try to reach my linux box from inside (local nw) or outside
> (internet) thru http, it works well
> but if I try to telnet or ftp or rlogin it from anywhere (even from my linux
> box) it connects and tell me that service isn't available (ftp error 421) or
> connection reset by peer...
>
> but I know that ftp or telnet is running cause it is effectively connected
> during a few seconds:
> (for ftp)
> # fuser -a -v -n tcp 21
> USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> 23/tcp root 425 f.... inetd
> root 1982 f.... tcpd
>
> so, what's happening ?
>
> Thanx for your help
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: local routing
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:35:08 -0700
I think I understand what you want.
Add a route to other comp IP using your own IP as gateway.
See if that works.
Tobias Knowles
Alex Fabrikant wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I just set up a second IP on my @home (cable modem) account, stuck a hub
in,
>and got everything working, except for one thing. Both my and my roommate's
>computers are set up to use a gateway at @home hq (or wherever it is) as
the
>default route. Unfortunately, @home has rather shoddy uplink speeds, and
any
>traffic that has to go from one of us through the gateway maxes out at
>~15K/sec, INCLUDING traffic going from my computer to my roommate's. From
what
>little I know of TCP/IP, I suspect there should be a way to set up a static
>route from my computer to my roommate's which would not need to go up the
>cable line but would somehow go straight through our local hub. However,
after
>2 hours of messing with route/ifconfig and perousing the HOWTO's, I found
>nothing. Does anyone know how to handle this? Any help would be greatly
>appreciated.
>
>--
>`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`
> Alex Fabrikant )\._.,--....,'``.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
> ICQ UIN: 1783262 '._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masquerading + Samba?
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:38:59 -0700
Read man smb.conf and look for browse-announce entry options.
At least I belive that's what it's called.
I assume the other computers are on a different subnet?
Tobias Knowles
Kertis Henderson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Hello!
>
>I'm running a RedHat 6.0 computer on a TCP/IP network. This computer
>runs Samba, too. This works real nicely, except that I really can't
>browse the local network. I have a WIndows 98 computer that is behind
>my Redhat computer, using IP Masquerading. This works very nicely for
>everything except SMB. I can see my RedHat computer from WIndows, but I
>can't see past it.
>
>Is there any way of seeing the rest of the network from Windows? Thanks
>for any input!
>
>--
>
>Kertis Henderson
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Ron Medrozo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help!!! Nt and Linux networking
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 21:26:35 -0500
I would really appreciate if someone can help me on how to network NT server
4 and Linux 5.4. I already installed SAMBA on Linux but I need more help on
how to make Linux appear on Network Neighborhood. Please help me on
configuration.
Thank you very much...
Ron
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What's IPv6 status?
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 01:39:29 GMT
I am currently writing a book on Linux sockets programming. I would
like to add a chapter on IPv6, but the only items I have found are
pre-alpha patches. I could simply add the section as "future support",
but that does not help to write and test sample programs.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Dan St.Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WANT: network "datascope" for linux/open-source
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 18:02:43 -0500
Does anyone know of "datascope" or "protocol analyzer" software that runs
on Linux? Of course I'd prefer open source freeware instead of pay for it
software
but foremost is find the tools.
thanks,
~~~ Dan 0:-D
--
==============================================================
The Tenth Amendment ... its not only a good idea, its the law!
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentx
==============================================================
------------------------------
From: Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What's IPv6 status?
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 03:36:19 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am currently writing a book on Linux sockets programming. I would
> like to add a chapter on IPv6, but the only items I have found are
> pre-alpha patches. I could simply add the section as "future support",
> but that does not help to write and test sample programs.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
You would think someone who was writing a programming book would have
the intelligence to merely look at comments in the kernel source, or
the source code itself.
--
Kyle Hargraves
Technical madman, or something of that nature.
"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping the common people quiet."
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
------------------------------
From: Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can an ISP detect masquerading?
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 02:09:25 +0000
The Dude wrote:
>
> How exactly the ports in the range 60000-65535 are used ?
> When one of my masqueraded client pass through Linux to go on
> www.someplace.com his ip is changed with the real one.
> Now my question is the port source and dest remain the same ?
> -If yes from where those higher ports appear on outside
> -If not and that's mean that the dest port get translated to 60000...
> how come it can connect to server listening only on port 80 ?
>
The source port gets altered -- not the destination.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ are my own and not
Shoreline, Washington USA \ those of my employer
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \________________________
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.apps.winsock.mail,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.winsock.mail,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking
Subject: thorny proxy / dial on demand / email question...
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:48:33 GMT
Hello all!
I'm currently attempting to solve the following problem:
A small non-profit I do systems administration for has a 56k dialup
connection. The ISP provides e-mail that is aliased to their domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] aliased to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current configuration is using Eudora lite to check e-mail through a
proxy (WinProxy Lite) sitting on an NT server that does dial-on-demand
for e-mail and web browsing.
Now the thorny part...
We're switching everyone (~20 user office) over to Outlook98 to
utilize the netfolders feature. (ie, share calendar information
without having an Exchange server on the back-end) I've implemented
this for two of the employees, and realized just what this would do to
the entire office. As netfolders uses e-mail messages to transfer
schedule/calendar changes between users, the message path goes
something like this:
User1 updates their calendar, and then User2 checks for updates:
User1 calendar update: ==>> Winproxy ==>> 56K cxn ==> ISP ==> 56k cxn
==> Winproxy ==> User2.
This would quickly saturate their already thin bandwidth.
Is there a way to:
1.) Implement a local mailserver (Linux or NT) that would hold local
mail, while forwarding external mail to Winproxy and checking external
mail @ intervals.
OR
2.) Do the same thing as #2, while taking the place of winproxy and
doing dial-on-demand, etc.
OR
3.) Chuck the whole thing and just get a 384k DSL connection.
Stipulations:
--This is a nonprofit (ie, we can scrape together a 486, but $$ for MS
proxy server are non existant..)
--I have much more experience with NT than Linux. (MCSE vs. "I've
installed RedHat once...") However, I am ready, willing, and able to
learn...
--This solution needs to be RELIABLE. (hence my thoughts of
Linux...no snickers, please)
I eagerly await the wisdom of Usenet...
Many thanks!
-Aaron Backer
MCSE, CNA, VIP, QED
(but not yet DOA)
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 22:24:46 -0400
From: Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp not working anymore
I recently bought a new 56k modem along with changing living locations.
THose are the only 2 factors that have changed. But yet for some reason
ppp wont work in linux now.
I'm using rh 5.1 and everything was working fine before i moved to
school in my apt and before i got a new modem. And no it isnt a
winmodem, I made sure it wasnt and it even says on the box it will work
with linux, among other OSes. But its not that the modem wont dial, but
linux even says that ppp isnt even in the kernel, but I havent even
touched the kernel, I had no reason to.
At startup I'm all of a sudden getting a lot of unresolved symbols
dealing with networking stuff ,ppp.o, being one of them. But I dont see
why since I havent even been using Linux for about 3 weeks so nothing
could have even been changed. Linux coudlnt even be accessed since I
hadnt used my rescue disk to put LILO back on the mbr since I had
reinstall Windows recently.
I do knwo the modem was installed on Com5 and irq 12 which i was able to
move it to com3 so i woudlnt have to make a new com port in linux. And
I used setserial to tell linux the modem uses irq 12 but I still dont
get anything, not even from minicom. Even if minicom did work I'd still
have problems with ppp b/c for some reason linux acts like ppp.o isnt
even in the kernel. I dont even know why it was complaining of
unresolved symbols at boot time b/c i compiled in ppp directly into the
kernel so i woudlnt have to worry about loading it everytime i wanted it
as a module. I have include output that I get when i try to do a
'insmod ppp.o'. it makes no sense to me but i put it in here in case
someone can help me with it.
If anyone needs any more info please let me know b/c I want to get this
damn thing fixed. It only makes me mad b/c I know that nothing has even
touched any files in Linux and before i got my new modem, and changed to
a diferent phone # since Im at school now, linux was working fine before
that. Even if the modem is fine somehow the damn ppp got messed up.
ppp.o: unresolved symbol kill_fasync_Ra394f189
ppp.o: unresolved symbol dev_close_Rbc2476b5
ppp.o: unresolved symbol dev_alloc_skb_R753f384a
ppp.o: unresolved symbol dev_kfree_skb_R56cb10ad
ppp.o: unresolved symbol register_netdev_R6ccb67ee
ppp.o: unresolved symbol netif_rx_Rb089a42b
ppp.o: unresolved symbol tty_register_ldisc_R52b306d9
ppp.o: unresolved symbol unregister_netdev_R7a53f724
ppp.o: unresolved symbol n_tty_ioctl_Rba30d46c
this comes directly from /var/log/messages
thanks
Brandon
--
"Bill Gates?, I dont know any Bill Gates. Oh, you mean 'by putting
every conceivable
feature into an OPERATING SYSTEM, whether you want it or not, is
innovation' Bill
Gates? Yeah, I know the monopolizer"
http://web.mountain.net/~brandon/main.htm
For Beginners in Linux, Emulation, Midis, Playstation Info, and
Virii.
------------------------------
From: crux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,redhat.networking.general
Subject: DNS/Firewall
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:31:07 GMT
Im newbie to Linux and here is my problem. I have setup my
linux box as a firewall and I would like to make it as a
primary DNS so I can register a domain name (with granitecanyon
as my secondary). I have a single static IP that my ISP assigned to me.
Can somebody help/guide on how to set this up? Also, if you can
provide a sample "named" files for both primary and secondary, it would
help a lot.
Thanks in advance.
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.linux
Subject: BRAZIL: Estagio Linux em SP (text in Portuguese)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 03:34:17 GMT
The following text is in Portuguese:
S�o Paulo, 01 de setembro de 1999
Oportunidade de est�gio em S�o Paulo: Unix, Linux, perl
A Communiplex est� contratando estagi�rios ou prestadores de servi�o
aut�nomos, e tamb�m cadastrando
interessados em emprego para eventual contrata��o.
Requerido:
Boa experi�ncia em Linux (instala��o e administra��o)
Bons conhecimentos de Perl e C (programa��o)
Desej�vel (um ou alguns dos seguintes �tens):
conhecimentos de PHP3 e databases SQL (mySQL, mSQL, Postgres)
(tamb�m PerlCGI com DBI)
conhecimentos de administra��o de rede (configura��o e
administra��o de TCP/IP em micros Windows ou
Linux)
conhecimentos de configura��o b�sica de hardware de micros
(instala��o de placa de rede, HD, mem�ria,
modem, etc.)
conhecimentos de bash, awk, etc. (shell scripting)
conhecimentos de rotinas de administra��o de Unix (verifica��o de
logs, backups, etc.)
experi�ncia com outros ambientes Unix (Solaris, HP, AIX, SGI,
SCO, BSDI, SunOS) ser� apreciada, mesmo
que voc� n�o tenha muita experi�ncia com o Linux
Outros �tens importantes:
ter micro com Linux em casa, com modem, linha telef�nica e acesso
Internet
ingl�s fluente ou leitura t�cnica de �timo n�vel
boa comunica��o pessoal
disposi��o para estudo de manuais, man pages, tutoriais e livros
(todos em ingl�s)
boa capacidade de pesquisa de informa��es na Internet (pesquisar
e achar informa��es em m�ltiplas fontes no
Exterior, em ingl�s)
grande iniciativa pessoal e capacidade de analisar e resolver
problemas
senso de responsabilidade para com as tarefas
talento, interesse e disposi��o para realizar tarefas de
naturezas variadas
A Communiplex (veja http://www.communiplex.com para apresenta��o,
informa��es e clientes) � uma empresa
especializada em servi�os Internet corporativos -- desde a produ��o de
Web Sites (inclusive de com�rcio eletr�nico),
at� servi�os de roteamento de correio, instala��o de gateways/firewalls,
instala��o de links e servidores, implanta��o
completa de provedores e outros projetos de consultoria. (A Communiplex
n�o � provedora de contas de acesso de
pessoas f�sicas).
Procuramos candidatos de primeira linha: pessoas que tenham realmente
grande paix�o por computa��o. Oferecemos
remunera��o adequada para est�gio, refei��o, vale-transporte, um
agrad�vel ambiente de trabalho e �timas condi��es
de aprendizado e experi�ncia. A Communiplex � uma empresa de ambiente
n�o-fumante.
Para cadastrar seus dados, utilize a ficha no endere�o:
http://www.communiplex.com/cv-cadastro.htm
Temos certeza de que � uma excelente oportunidade para estudantes e
prestadores de servi�o talentosos.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Jim Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:34:12 -0400
Chauzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> No kidding. Mine crashed all the time, bringing the X server with it
too!!!
> So much for stability!!! Linux kernel may be stable, but it don't mean
shit
> if the X server sucks. Who wants linux without a GUI.
>
I'd like to second that.
Jim
------------------------------
From: "Todd K. Tuttle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux friendly ISPs
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 21:44:29 -0500
I have been trying to get a Linux PPP connection to go for 3 days straight
now. Probably well over 30 hours of fruitless trial and error. It seems like
it should be simple connect, but trying every combination, trick and stupid
trick, it just sits there. Of course I can configure a connection with a
Windows or Mac in under a minute. Probably most ISPs can connect up a Linux
PPP, except it soooooooooooooo @#$%@#^&^ ridiculously hard that it's not
worth the effort.
The connection behaves exactly this way with minicom or a terminal program
(without the quotes and commas of course):
I Dial in,
Get "Connect 2X000/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS",
I hit <Enter>,
I get "Username:",
I enter my username and hit <enter>,
I get "Password:",
I enter my password and hit <enter>,
I get a ">" prompt,
I enter the command "ppp",
I get PPP characters,
Now this doesn't seem complicated. But whatever I try to put in, it hangs at
the "Connect" part and just sits. And I just sits...I've tried going through
every chat options, from the chat man page. All the suggestions in the How
To PPP guide. The how to hook up PPP by W.G Unruh. Absolutely nothing works.
So I'm asking, begging actually, if you where using a Linux PPP connection
using pppd to connect to the above connection, what would your script look
like?
Again, I don't think it's ISP being Linux "Friendly", it's the crappy chat
scripts that are ridiculously hard. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sorry for the soap-box...
Bayee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ksvenbak wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know where I can find a list of Internet Service Providers
> > that support dial-in using linux?
> >
> > K
>
> As far as I know, as long as Window can dial-in, Linux can too (using
> PPP or KPPP). I am now using my Linux dial-in to reply this to you.
------------------------------
From: Seth Rothberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need help deciphering an NFS error message
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:19:04 -0400
When I attempt to mount a filesystem from my NFS server I get this messag=
e:
mount: RPC: Program not registered
What does this mean? And how do I get past it to the next error message w=
hich
will probably be something like:
mount: only root can do that
Vitals: client and server are both running RH6.0.=20
Thanks,
Seth
------------------------------
From: "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Autodialing PPP Gateway?
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 19:58:54 -0700
Brian J. Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7qj8bp$3s2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> I've tried searching a bit for a program like this through freshmeat, but
I
> haven't had much luck. Basically, I have a 486 that I want to make a
> communications server. In other words, I have a home network and modem
> connected to it, and I would like to have it that it dials up my ISP
> (username and password stored) whenever some sockets need to go outside of
> the home network. With a settable timeout, it would disconnect from
> inactivity.
http://www.loonie.net/~eschenk/diald.html
------------------------------
From: "Jim Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:35:50 -0400
L. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7qkeeh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Quite a few people use linux without a GUI. In linux, more than
> any other OS, the GUI is eye candy a little more. The vast majority
> of tasks can be accomplished in linux without the GUI.
> As for the X server, you are most definaetly in the minority.
> Most do not lose X when nescape goes down. Sounds to me like you're
> got a bigger problem on your hands.
Not really.
I've noticed anything with a memory leak can hang the entire system.
The KDE icon editor does this often.
So can other apps.
Jim
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
