Linux-Networking Digest #485, Volume #12 Mon, 6 Sep 99 06:13:47 EDT
Contents:
Re: funky ip behavior: ping eth1, and eth0 responds! (Thomas Kaemer)
Problem with NFS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts (Terry Paddy)
Re: strange login behavior (BLANCHER Cedric)
connection reset by peer ("Frank Bauer")
Can you send e-mail to an IP address? ("David Henry")
Re: multicast mrouted under RedHat 6.0? (Kevin Brown)
Re: port forwarding woes ("Cort Schaefer")
NFS server not allowing submounts (David Nillesen)
Apache configuration (Steven Sykes)
strange login behavior ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: hylafax help ("Marcus J�ttner")
Re: strange login behavior (BLANCHER Cedric)
Configuring Samba on a Home LAN ("fjsilver")
ipppd and defaultroute (Dmitri Barski)
Re: port forwarding woes ("Cort Schaefer")
gestetner 3225, help? ("Naor")
Re: [SuSE-6.2] wvdial and kppp flaw (Andrew Otwell)
Re: DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts ("Frank Bauer")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Thomas Kaemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: funky ip behavior: ping eth1, and eth0 responds!
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 06:54:16 +0200
Bruce Bantos schrieb:
>
> install, but I have disabled it in the /etc/sysconfig/network file
> (FORWARD_IPV4 = "no"). I configured eth0 to use ip = 192.168.0.100, and eth1
> to use 192.168.0.101. There are no errors on boot, and eth0 and eth1 come up
> ok. The correct i/o addresses and interrupts are assigned, as shown in
> As you can see, eth1 is getting the ping packets, but then eth0 is
> responding. My friends, what is up?
>
It's seeems that your problem is that the both cards are in the same
subnet. Try 2 different:
eth0 192.168.0.100 netmask 255.255.255.128
eth1 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.128
what do you want to do with this cards?
CU Thomas
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with NFS
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 07:54:24 GMT
Hello,
I configured my network so, that my users login via NIS and get their
home
directories via NFS.
No problem so far.
But now I upgraded to SuSE 6.2 and run into problems:
1) The old exports file results in no reacrtion from the NFS server,
givin a timeout medssage on the client.
2) Reducing the entries in /etc/exports to
/home (rw)
without any identification of hosts, allows the import of the home
directories at startup time, but I see an error in /var/log/messages:
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsgid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setgroups: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsgid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setgroups: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsgid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setgroups: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
This behaviour should according to man exports happen, if ther is no
user nobody and no group nogroup available on the system.
BU IT IS.
Any help welcome
Thanks
Karl Sarnow
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Paddy)
Subject: DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 08:43:22 GMT
Hello,
I have a 2 box test TCP/IP network set up. A Linux RH6/Apache-SSL
1.3.9 server and a Win98 client.
I have used an IP address of 169.254.100.20 for the Linux server and
169.254.100.10 for the Win98 box
on the Win98 "Hosts.sam" file I have
127.0.0.1 localhost
169.254.100.10 windowsbox
169.254.100.20 www.mybusiness.com
169.254.100.20 www.myotherbusiness.com
on the Linux server I have in the etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 localhosts
169.254.100.10 windowsbox
169.254.100.20 www.mybusiness.com
169.254.100.20 www.myotherbusiness.com
the "ServerName" is actually [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have setup Apache web server to have 2 virtual hosts - I'm pretty
sure that the setup is correct because httpd -S lists them correctly
and the syntax check apachectl configtest is OK
I have no DNS set up because I thought, on such a simple setup, the
respective "hosts" files would point to the right boxes.
When I point the browser at http://169.254.100.20/ I get the
index.html of mybusiness.com, this tells me that mybusiness.com is the
default virtual host. I also can PING 169.254.100.20
If I type http:// www.mybusiness.com/ or
http://www.myotherbusiness.com then I get nothing except the "can't
find the page ...etc... DNS not set up. I cannot ping
www.mybusiness.com or www.myotherbusiness.com
I thought that tthe browser would look in C:\windows\hosts.asm and
resolve the FQDN to the IP address??
I'm really stuck here. I'm trying to get two demo web sites running on
a local network before passing the box to an ISP.
I would be very gratefull for *any* assistance....
Thanks.... Terry
Terry Paddy
Christchurch, New Zealand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: BLANCHER Cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: strange login behavior
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 10:22:52 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've got two linux boxes on my intranet. Everything is running fine
> except that I cannot login locally as "root" on one machine. However,
> only a remote ssh session from the other machine is possible. I put
>
> ALL : ALL
>
> into the hosts.allow file but it still doesn't work. What files must I
> configure in what manner in order to allow a local login and disallow a
> remote login for "root"?
login definitions are not handled by hosts.allow or hosts.deny which are
tcpd files. You should have a look to /etc/login.defs :) For FTP,
/etc/ftpusers specify which users are not allowed to FTP the box.
It is a very bad idea to remotly log as root with telnet or FTP. Prefer
ssh or su when you're in your shell.
------------------------------
From: "Frank Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: connection reset by peer
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:06:50 +0200
since update from Kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.10 (Distr. SuSE) we've got big
problems with getting disconnections from our samba server.
the most important entry in smb.log:
[1999/09/06 09:30:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507)
read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
[1999/09/06 09:30:59, 1] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406)
Closing connections
does anyone how to correct this?
Thanks
Frank
Our Samba Version 2.0.5b (current release according to samba.org)
our smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = BB3
server string = Samba Server
guest account = nobody
keep alive = 30
os level = 2
# war vorher security = user und Zeile mit password server ist neu
security = server
password server = 192.168.21.1
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
# oplocks = yes
# fake oplocks = no
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
dead time = 30
read prediction = yes
read raw = yes
write raw = yes
getwd cache = yes
debug level = 2
max log size = 1000
create mode = 755
directory mode = 755
dos filetimes = yes
dos filetime resolution = yes
case sensitive = no
short preserve case = yes
preserve case = yes
interfaces = 192.168.21.2/255.255.255.0
wins support = no
wins server = 192.168.21.1
local master = no
[homes]
create mode = 0750
writable = yes
comment = Heimatverzeichnis
browseable = no
locking = no
[printers]
comment = All Printers
browseable = no
printable = yes
public = no
read only = yes
create mode = 0700
directory = /tmp
[FUER_ALLE]
writable = yes
comment = Installierte Programme
path = /FOR_ALL
browseable = yes
locking = no
write list = @nogroup,@users
user = @users,@nogroup
public = yes
[DATEN]
delete readonly = yes
writable = yes
comment = Daten
path = /DATEN
public = yes
create mask = 0766
directory mask = 0777
[Data]
delete readonly = yes
writable = yes
path = /DATEN/daten
public = yes
create mask = 0766
directory mask = 0777
our hardware:
AMD K6-2-350, 256 MB RAM, IPC Vortex Raid-Controller, Intel EtherExpress
Pro100+, Asus P5AB, S3 VGA
------------------------------
From: "David Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can you send e-mail to an IP address?
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:27:42 +0200
RFC822 states that
address = localpart@domain.
domain = sub_domain *(.subdomain)
sub-domain = domain-ref / domain-literal
domain-ref = atom
atom = 1*<any CHAR except specials, SPACE and CTLs>
Does all this mean that an dotted quad IP address (which could fit the
above diagram) can be considered as a domain and therefore a legal e-mail
address.
To confuse the picture, The post.office server on my SunOS accepts
name@IPaddress but
sendmail on Linux doesn't.
------------------------------
From: Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: multicast mrouted under RedHat 6.0?
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 08:36:39 GMT
I found libc.so.4 on a couple RedHat Linux machines I had upgraded from
5.1 to 6.0 but it doesn't seem to exist on the a machine loaded with 6.0
from scratch. I copied the file to /usr/lib and mrouted then ran
apparently correctly. I say apparently because, while all the dvmrp
messages are sent correctly and the box communicates with all its
neighbors, it will NOT forward the multicast data streams themselves.
This same problem occurs on both a box I upgraded from 5.1 to 6.0 and
which was working perfectly as a multicast router previous to the
upgrade and on a box I loaded 6.0 on from scratch (as a test case.)
Neither will forward data streams. Since it's the same mrouted
executable running, and my /etc/mrouted.conf file is the same, and I
compiled the same options into the 6.0 kernel that I had compiled into
the 5.1 kernel, I can only assume that something is broken in the 6.0
kernel. That or some additional configuration is needed for 6.0.
I checked the RedHat errata but I've found nothing. If anyone out there
knows what is going on, I could really use some help. My users are
ready to rise up against me as it is.
Thanks,
Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Rossi wrote:
>
> Has anyone run mrouted (the multicast routing daemon) under RedHat
> Linux 6.0? I pulled down
> ftp://www.video.ja.net/mice/mrouted/Linux/mrouted-3.81-linux.tgz
> but when I run it I get:
>
> mrouted: can't find library 'libc.so.4'
>
> I've tried adding a link to /usr/lib/libc.so.4 from /usr/lib/libc.so,
> but still no
> luck.
> I've tried to recompile the source, but it doesn't compile out of the
> box,
> so I'm not sure what to do next
>
> I can't belive that someone hasn't done this before. Any pointers?
>
> TIA,
> Steve
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Steven K. Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Research Engineer
> Multimedia Communications Research Laboratory
> Motorola Labs
> -------------------------------------------------------
--
Kevin Brown (510) 885-4007
Department of Acct/CIS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Math/CS www.mcs.csuhayward.edu/~kbrown
California State University Hayward
------------------------------
From: "Cort Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: port forwarding woes
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 02:24:19 -0600
James Offutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ph875$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok. I've read the FAQs, scoured the Linux newsgroups and even contacted
the
> author of ipmasqadm (who verified my configuration) and I still can't get
> simple port forwarding to work. This is driving me nuts. Any suggestions
> are greatly appreciated.
>
> The scenario:
>
> Standard Redhat 6.0
> Kernel 2.2.5-15
> ipchains-1.3.8-3
> ipmasqadm-0.4.2
> Two ethernet interfaces
> External is ip_aliased with three legal addresses (DNS registered)
> Internal is a single reserved address and network
>
> IP masquerading is configured and working for intenal -> external
> connections. I use the following:
>
> /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
> /sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.32.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQ
>
> IP forwarding is enabled in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> The kernel and modules have been rebuilt with all the relevant options
set.
>
>
> The requirement:
>
> I want to forward several ports from each external ip address to different
> internal IP addresses. This seems like it should be simple. To forward a
> simple telnet I use:
>
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_portfw
> /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L x.x.x.x 23 -R 192.168.32.20 23
>
> The result:
>
> A telnet sessions to x.x.x.x (from a completely outside source) just
> hangs. Closer investigation shows that port forward is working -- sort
of.
> The netstat output of 192.168.32.20 shows a SYN_RECV connection from the
> remote address. Also, netstat -M on masquerading Linux box shows a
correct
> entry for the translation. Nevertheless, the conversation is never
> completed and the session just hangs.
>
> I've also tried adding several ipchains, in particular:
>
> ipchains -I forward -p tcp -s 192.168.32.20/32 23 -j MASQ
>
> -- with no luck. Unless I misunderstand the ipchains syntax this seemed
> redundant anyway...
>
>
> Am I missing something obvious?
>
> TIA.
>
> --
> James Offutt
>
------------------------------
From: David Nillesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS server not allowing submounts
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 16:05:53 +1000
Hi folks,
My NFS server will not allow me to view the filesystems i have mounted
on it.
I want to back up so I NFS mount / to my backup machine.
I can view anything on the / filesystem happily, however as soon as i
try and access something that is another partition on the server it is
not visible.
This is making it damned hard to backup
I am running 2.2.12 (linux) and Redhat 6.0
Any ideas?
Thanks,
David Nillesen.
------------------------------
From: Steven Sykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Apache configuration
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 20:34:21 +1200
Hi all,
Is there a way to make Apache assume that any file you might be
accessing from one's local website that has *no* extension load as an
HTML page?
Cheers,
--
Steven
Webmaster of WACC - Wellington Acorn Computer Club
WACC pages: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~pbrowne/WACC/
Phone: (03) 358-5601 or (025) 908-448
My pages: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~acorn/
... Where's my 640Meg SIMM? I want to run Excel!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: strange login behavior
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 07:49:18 GMT
I've got two linux boxes on my intranet. Everything is running fine
except that I cannot login locally as "root" on one machine. However,
only a remote ssh session from the other machine is possible. I put
ALL : ALL
into the hosts.allow file but it still doesn't work. What files must I
configure in what manner in order to allow a local login and disallow a
remote login for "root"?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Marcus J�ttner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: hylafax help
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 08:45:43 +0200
ioleann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to install hylafax as a faxserver on a RH6.0 for a 10 Win
> 9x network.
> The binary is pretty straightforward to install and the docs explain
> how to setup a new fax. So far so good. What it doesn't explain is how
> to use the client to send and receive faxes, let alone from Win 9x
> machines on the network.
>
> Thanks for all help, especially as this was supposed to be fully
> operational last week. oops
>
> ilan
Hi
In ounet here i use WHFC on Win9x and WinNT.
You can find it here http://www.transcom.de/whfc
bye
------------------------------
From: BLANCHER Cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: strange login behavior
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 10:56:05 +0200
BLANCHER Cedric wrote:
> login definitions are not handled by hosts.allow or hosts.deny which are
> tcpd files. You should have a look to /etc/login.defs :) For FTP,
> /etc/ftpusers specify which users are not allowed to FTP the box.
> It is a very bad idea to remotly log as root with telnet or FTP. Prefer
> ssh or su when you're in your shell.
Also have a look to /etc/securetty that specifies which tty are secure
enough for root login (usually console and nothing else).
------------------------------
From: "fjsilver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Configuring Samba on a Home LAN
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 22:36:17 -0300
My name is Fernando, I'm from Brazil, and I'm trying to set up my Linux
Redhat 5.2 to share and/or access files from a Win98 PC. I'm used to do that
between two Win98 machines, just sharing some folders and configuring the
correct devices, but I'm totally lost now that I'm trying to do the same
with Linux. I don't know how to configure Samba correctly and how to be sure
of what's missing in the configuration. The Samba-HOWTO doesn't seem to be
so much of a help either, so I'm writing to you experienced people =).
Can anyone tell me of an good and simple Samba tutorial, or maybe even
contact me by e-mail to give me some initial instructions.
I really need to learn this fast but I just don't know what to do anymore.
Thanks a Lot Folks!
Fernando Jorge
------------------------------
From: Dmitri Barski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipppd and defaultroute
Date: 6 Sep 1999 08:59:08 GMT
Hi folks!
I've got a kind of very strange problem using ipppd and isdnctrl in
"autodial" mode: when disfconnecting ( after the huptimeout or after
isdnctrl hangup ), ipppd ( at least I think it's him ) deletes the
default route pointing to ippp0. Therefore, when I later try to connect
to something outside my ISP's net ( i.e. outside 134.91. ), it fails
with "network unreacheable". I've tried "defaultroute" ( which would
obviously produce such behaviour, because then ipppd sets the
defaultroute when the interface comes up and deletes it when the
interface gets down ), "-defaultroute" and just no defaultroute options
for ipppd - without success. Is there any way to handle this?
I DO know that ipppd reads "/etc/ppp/ioptions" ( in fact, I use this
file to pass options to ipppd ), so I canNOT have overseen
"defaultroute" in this file.
TIA
CU Dmitri Barski
------------------------------
From: "Cort Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: port forwarding woes
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 02:37:37 -0600
I am having a simular problem (that is going to drive me nuts). I am
somewhat new to Linux, so please bear with me.
I have a network at home with multiple machines. I have a Linux RedHat 6.0
machine that dials my ISP for me and does IP masquerading just fine. I am
using IPCHAINS for the masquerading. I have Apache running on the Linux
box, but would really like to redirect port 80 to another internal machine
on the same port. I have read many HOWTOs and lots of newsgroup messages
and they all say use IPMASQADM. I have tried this with no luck. Before
running the portfw command (ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L <dialup addr>
80 -R <internal addr> 80), I can see the Apache page. After, I get an error
message saying that a connection with the server could not be establised
(after what seems like a long timeout period).
I have read that IPMASQADM is "experimental", but what else is avaliable if
you are using IPCHAINS? I have read about rinetd, and that might work for
just www, but I would also like to forward ftp later on (assuming I can
forward www!) and that is not supported in 0.52.
I would appreciate any comments.
Cort
James Offutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ph875$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok. I've read the FAQs, scoured the Linux newsgroups and even contacted
the
> author of ipmasqadm (who verified my configuration) and I still can't get
> simple port forwarding to work. This is driving me nuts. Any suggestions
> are greatly appreciated.
>
> The scenario:
>
> Standard Redhat 6.0
> Kernel 2.2.5-15
> ipchains-1.3.8-3
> ipmasqadm-0.4.2
> Two ethernet interfaces
> External is ip_aliased with three legal addresses (DNS registered)
> Internal is a single reserved address and network
>
> IP masquerading is configured and working for intenal -> external
> connections. I use the following:
>
> /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
> /sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.32.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQ
>
> IP forwarding is enabled in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> The kernel and modules have been rebuilt with all the relevant options
set.
>
>
> The requirement:
>
> I want to forward several ports from each external ip address to different
> internal IP addresses. This seems like it should be simple. To forward a
> simple telnet I use:
>
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_portfw
> /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L x.x.x.x 23 -R 192.168.32.20 23
>
> The result:
>
> A telnet sessions to x.x.x.x (from a completely outside source) just
> hangs. Closer investigation shows that port forward is working -- sort
of.
> The netstat output of 192.168.32.20 shows a SYN_RECV connection from the
> remote address. Also, netstat -M on masquerading Linux box shows a
correct
> entry for the translation. Nevertheless, the conversation is never
> completed and the session just hangs.
>
> I've also tried adding several ipchains, in particular:
>
> ipchains -I forward -p tcp -s 192.168.32.20/32 23 -j MASQ
>
> -- with no luck. Unless I misunderstand the ipchains syntax this seemed
> redundant anyway...
>
>
> Am I missing something obvious?
>
> TIA.
>
> --
> James Offutt
>
------------------------------
From: "Naor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gestetner 3225, help?
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:08:57 +0200
I have in work a net with MFP called gestetner 3225, it's connected to an NT
server.
I have a computer with RH linux 6 installed, and i want to set up this
printer.
how can i do that?
I know that there are no available drivers for unix to this MFP.
thanks
Naor
------------------------------
From: Andrew Otwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SuSE-6.2] wvdial and kppp flaw
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 01:51:01 -0400
2 fold question - What user accounts are you using to do what (i.e. crank up
kppp AND kmail with the root account while logged in as your user account)?
On Sun, 05 Sep 1999, Habibi4me wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just upgraded to SuSE-6.2 and found some flaw in wvdial as well as
>KPPP. The wvdial terminates right after the ppp connection is
>established. I am wondering if this is a bug.
>
>On the other hand, I can't use any X application once the kppp has
>established the connection. I tried to execute the "kmail" after the
>kppp has established the connection and I got the following message:
>
> Xlib: connection to "localhost:0.0" refused by server
> Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server
> kmail: cannot connect to X server
>localhost:0
>
>Why these all things happened with new installation?
>
>--
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>PS. Remove "4m" from e-mail address to enable reply.
------------------------------
From: "Frank Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:30:12 +0200
> on the Win98 "Hosts.sam" file I have
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
> 169.254.100.10 windowsbox
> 169.254.100.20 www.mybusiness.com
> 169.254.100.20 www.myotherbusiness.com
> I thought that tthe browser would look in C:\windows\hosts.asm and
> resolve the FQDN to the IP address??
>
hosts.sam is only the sample file for the hosts file (should be)
change the name of hosts.sam to hosts.
HTH
Frank
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
