Linux-Networking Digest #528, Volume #12 Thu, 9 Sep 99 15:13:48 EDT
Contents:
Re: how to get all linked pages ? (Mark Carey)
apache and cgi permissions ("Aaron")
Re: My 100MB lan card runs at 10MB, why? (Donald Becker)
Re: HP Night Director Plus 10/100 ethernet card driver? (Donald Becker)
Re: Red Hat Linux and VPN ("John Hardin")
Re: Browsers and Linux ("Ernest")
how to connect internet using ADSL ? (Steven Wu)
Re: Browsers and Linux ("Ernest")
Pinging second NIC from Linux box ("Matt McInnes")
Re: Browsers and Linux (Norman Levin)
Re: Browsers and Linux (Norman Levin)
Re: setting up networking w/ win98 computers (Raf Meeusen)
PPP hangs X (Diego Calzolari)
Re: NIC stops responding (fred anger)
Re: Browsers and Linux ("Ernest")
Re: IP masquerading (Anders Peterson)
Re: DSL - Linux tools to check connection speed (Paul Lew)
Re: Windows using PPP (Clifford Kite)
Setting the source IP address (bill davidsen)
mount: RPC: Program not registered? (Douglas Nichols)
NetWare for Linux ("Herminio Alvarez, Jr.")
Re: telnet program for win98 ("Zsolt Mate")
Kernel 2.2.5-22 SMP/ Hang under high traffic load? (John Murtari)
Re: Synchronizing time between server. (Chuck)
Problem with Kingston VP10/100 & SuSE 6.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
2nd NIC not recognized ("Colin Reinhardt")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to get all linked pages ?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 08:16:26 +1300
Bert Douglas wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just got my first linux mandrake box 3 days ago.
> Linux email is not yet working. So don't blast me, please.
>
> I want to make some kind of fairly simple script that will get all the linked pages
>of a given URL.
>
> I strongly suspect there is something already available to do this. I just don't
>know the right terminology, so it is difficult to
> find.
>
> Thanks,
> Bert Douglas
When getting into Linux I wrote a small program in Visual Basic to do this.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apache and cgi permissions
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 12:00:28 -0400
ok i finally figured out how to at least get apache to try and run the cgi
scripts but the web brower comes up with the message "You are not authorized
to view this page" i am running apache user: nobody group: nobody and i
changed the ownership and group of the entire directory and scrip to
nobody..and it still gives me that
any help would be great
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Becker)
Subject: Re: My 100MB lan card runs at 10MB, why?
Date: 9 Sep 1999 11:56:31 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My Linux 2.0 system autoprobes the network card and, correctly,
>decides that it is an 3C905B 100MB device.
What driver version are you using?
>When connected to a 10/100MB hub I can surf the net to my hearts
>content. However when connected to a 100MB only hub nothing works.
>This leaves me to assume that the card is, in fact, running at 10MB
>only.
>Two questions:
>1. What utility can tell me exactly at what rate the card is running?
The 'mii-diag' program
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/diag/index.html
>2. How can I force it to run at 100MB?
Read
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
ftp://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/linux/drivers/3c59x.c
But first try a more recent driver version, e.g. v0.99L.
--
Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USRA-CESDIS, Center of Excellence in Space Data and Information Sciences.
Code 930.5, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. 20771
301-286-0882 http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/people/becker/whoiam.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Becker)
Subject: Re: HP Night Director Plus 10/100 ethernet card driver?
Date: 9 Sep 1999 12:05:17 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Neeraj Purandare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Folks,
>I have a HP Kayak XU PC, and this one came with a ethernet card
>which
>is called on HP's web site as "HP Night Director Plus 10/100".
HP's name means nothing. Less than nothing, since they will keep same name
and part number even when the underlying hardware changes.
>I have RH 6.0 installed on this, and try as I might, I cannot get
>any
>of the hp ethernet driver modules to load. I've tried hp.o, hp100.o,
>hp-plus.o.
The hp.o and hp-plus.o drivers are for ancient ISA cards based on the 8390.
The hp100.o driver is for the obsolete 100VG cards.
HP now uses standard chips and designs from external sources.
Run 'lspci' or 'cat /proc/pci' to find the chip type, and then read
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/index.html
Your distribution likely already has the proper driver.
--
Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USRA-CESDIS, Center of Excellence in Space Data and Information Sciences.
Code 930.5, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. 20771
301-286-0882 http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/people/becker/whoiam.html
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat Linux and VPN
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 09:50:11 -0700
Michael Pries wrote in message <7r66sd$a37$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>I'm having some issues with a VPN that I have setup using Red Hat Linux
5.2,
>ssh v2.0.13, and pppd v2.2.
>I originally setup the VPN using Red Hat 5.0 and things worked great. I
>reconfigured the machines (fresh install) with Red Hat 5.2 and set them
all up
>exactly as they were with the exeception of the later version of Red Hat.
The
>problem that I have is that after the system is up for a while a link will
>randomly quit passing data. Doing an ifconfig shows the link as still
being
>active (pppX still exists on both sides) but I can't ping hosts across
that
>link. I have to kill the ssh process and restart the VPN for that site.
Hmm.
You may wish to consider moving to the FreeS/WAN implementation of IPsec.
Take a look at the home page at http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan/
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight...
Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
------------------------------
From: "Ernest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 08:37:59 +0200
No, Usenet does not seem to have standards regarding top or bottom. They only
ask you not to copy the complete quoted portion but, only the relevant part.
Andre van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Op Wed, 8 Sep 1999 06:42:36 +0200 is het volgende aan Ernest ontsproten:
> Besides i think it's sort off usenet standard to reply
> at the bottom. It's sure nice if we all use the same quoting mechanism, it
> keeps long threads readable you see.
No, Usenet does not seem to have standards regarding top or bottom. They only
ask you not to copy the complete quoted portion but, only the relefant part.
> Why should the most important thing go at the top of the message? If you
have
> a smart reader let it jump to the most important part automagically. With
> snail mail you usually don't send a copy of the original message along. So
you
> really quote inside your reply. Where u say someting like:
> In your letter of bla bla you say quote quote ..... and i think it sucks.
> So that's also reply after the original, really.
So, when then complain if someone posts at the top or the bottom. Just get a
better browser. Just remember - I have never complained about it.
Ernest Bessinger
------------------------------
From: Steven Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to connect internet using ADSL ?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 16:41:03 GMT
hi,
i used ADSL connect to internet in windows 95. now i want make it works
in my linux box (slackware 4.0).
my ADSL modem come from alcatel (www.alcatel.com), which connect to my
home network by a ethenet interface. to establish ADSL connection, my
isp give me a WinPoET software from iVation to play as a dial-up client
in win95. without it, the connection can not be established. you can
find information about this software on www.ivation.com. but i'm so
sad, ivation did not give any linux/unix solution. now, how can i get
internet working under linux?
anyone has experience about this? i hope you understand what i said.
thanks in advance.
--
steven wu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Ernest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:14:51 +0200
Ever thought to use the 'subject' to describe the summary of the problem?
Ernest
Dave Seyster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:td6B3.29973$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sun, 05 Sep 1999 21:57:47 -0400, Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >I wonder where the 'custom' of answering after the
> >question comes from? I've just be going thru some of
> >my offline usergroups, and I've gone through a dozen
> >appends that start with ">" and the same original
> >question ... and I have to scroll down to see
> >new stuff. If I'm really interested in the
> >original append (and I can't remember if from
> >the subject line), I can do that.
>
>
> That "custom" derives from the fact that most humans are not psychic.
> We need to know the question before we can respond.
>
>
> Dave Seyster
------------------------------
From: "Matt McInnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Pinging second NIC from Linux box
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 01:01:46 +1000
I am having trouble pinging the second network card in my Linux box.
The first card is at 192.168.0.1 and the second is at 192.168.0.2. They are
on the same subnet and connected via a 10Mbps hub. My windows95 machine is
at 192.168.0.10 on the same subnet.
I have ip masquerading set up and the windows95 machine can use the Internet
perfectly. My Linux box also has no trouble using Internet services.
The problem is that when I try to ping the second card on the linux bax at
192.168.0.2 all the packets are lost. I can ping both 192.168.0.1 and my
windows95 machine at 192.168.0.10.
I intend to connect a cable modem to the second card on the Linux box. Will
this correct the problem when the second card becomes a gateway to the
Internet?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:51:18 -0400
From: Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Ernest wrote:
>
*** material removed.
> Dave Seyster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:td6B3.29973$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Sun, 05 Sep 1999 21:57:47 -0400, Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >I wonder where the 'custom' of answering after the
> > >question comes from?
> > That "custom" derives from the fact that most humans are not psychic.
> > We need to know the question before we can respond.
I think I'm going to go with the approach of interspersing answers at the
appropriate points in an append (instead of all at the end) and eliminating
materials that are just not important.
--
Norman Levin
vm/dynAmIX inc.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:51:32 -0400
From: Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Ernest wrote:
>
*** material removed.
> Dave Seyster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:td6B3.29973$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Sun, 05 Sep 1999 21:57:47 -0400, Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >I wonder where the 'custom' of answering after the
> > >question comes from?
> > That "custom" derives from the fact that most humans are not psychic.
> > We need to know the question before we can respond.
*** I think I'm going to go with the approach of interspersing answers at the
appropriate points in an append (instead of all at the end) and eliminating
materials that are just not important.
--
Norman Levin
vm/dynAmIX inc.
------------------------------
From: Raf Meeusen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: setting up networking w/ win98 computers
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 14:14:37 +0000
in short:
- install samba;
- make smb.conf in /etc
- run "samba start"
my simple smb.conf (no password required, not writeable):
[global]
workgroup = KOT
server string = Linux rules
security = share
[Raf_800_meg]
path = /data800
public = yes
[Raf_500_meg]
path = /data500
public = yes
------------------------------
From: Diego Calzolari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP hangs X
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 19:48:25 +0200
Hi, maybe someone can help me!
I've got RH6 and pppd 2.3.9. The fact is that when pppd starts (i.e.
when I get my dynamic IP and only after that moment!) I'm no longer able
to open windows! I must open all the applications I need BEFORE starting
the connection.
Everything else works good. I tried to start netscape from a previously
open terminal and received the message "connection refused, cannot
connect server 0:0" or something like this.
Even killing the daemon is not enough! I'm not able to logout from gnome
(or kde, it's the same), so I've got to use ctrl+alt+bs (getting core
dump). When the login prompt appears it reports root@<domain given by my
ISP>.
Please help me! Thanks a lot in advance.
Diego
------------------------------
From: fred anger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: NIC stops responding
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 18:08:35 GMT
In article <mUDB3.564$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"M. Smith" <smith_ml@swbell-dot-net> wrote:
> My first guess would be a mechanical fault in either the cable (more
likely)
> or the card's connector. Sounds like the act of unplugging and
replugging
> the connection creates enough vibration to re-establish the
connection.
>
> If this is consistently happening only at one PC, this is almost
certainly
> your problem. My first effort would be to replace the RJ-45 connector
at
> that end, or replace the entire cable. Which is easiest depends on how
much
> wire-pulling is involved. Faster and cheaper to replace the whole
cable if
> the machines are in the same room, but easier to replace the plug the
more
> rooms the two computers are apart.
It consistently happens with 2 PCs, and I've replaced the cable on both
machines 2 or 3 times (each) in the past year. It happens with the hub
in my office, and when plugged into the building's switches via one of 3
ethernet jacks in my cubical, so I'm less inclined to think it's the
cable.
> If that doesn't work, my second guess would be a mechanical fault (bad
> solder joint, bent RJ-45 connector pins, etc.) in the NIC itself. You
might
> also try re-seating the card, but we're getting into remote
likelihoods at
> this point.
Yeah. Unless we got a bad spool of cable, I don't know. I'd suspect
the NIC if it were just one machine, but it happens with 2. As far as I
know, nobody else around here is having the same problems with theirs
(all Windoze machines), so I thought maybe something funky was going on
with the Linux drivers for these machines, but even that doesn't make
sense. Then again, my level of understanding doesn't go very far to
that end...
--
fred anger
http://www.triib.com/anger/
BRING BACK DEJANEWS.COM
'RATE THIS' SUCKS!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Ernest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 08:39:34 +0200
And, there you said it all. It is your opinion. Why force on to me?
Ernest Bessinger
Jeremy Crabtree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [SNIP]
>
> My own opinion is this...
>
> It is less confusing to reply after the original question.
>
> 1) Because the human mind processes the data that way, from top to bottom
> in chronological order
>
> 2) It's really aggrivating to have to scroll back up to the top to
> find that one line response that you skipped over because it looked
> like a message header
>
> --
> "Being myself a remarkably stupid fellow, I have had to unteach myself
> the difficulties, and now beg to present to my fellow fools the parts
> that are not hard" --Silvanus P. Thompson, from "Calculus Made Easy."
------------------------------
From: Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 18:11:13 GMT
Thank you for offering to help, and let me apologise for not reading
the HOWTOs before asking.
My problem now is that I've read fragments of several HOWTOs and I'm
confused as to what exactly it is I'm trying to do - which HOWTO should
I read.
Let me explain the setting: I have a Linux box with two network
interfaces. One of those will connect to an ADSL modem and use DHCP to
get an IP-address from my ISP. The other interface will connect to a
LAN with IP-addresses in the 192.168.x.x range.
I want to set things up so that all computers on the LAN can access the
Internet. What is the correct name for this?
http://www.bynari.com/lcsrc.org/fwconsulting.html
This was well written. I use SuSE Linux 6.1. They supplied a firewall
and masquerading HOWTO, and scripts to set it up, that seemed good as
well. But I�m having troubles compiling a kernel, and I�m not sure how
me having two interfaces change things.
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.77.html
Strange! The LDP has an older version.
http://ftp.sunet.se/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
/Anders
In article <7r5cnm$11j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jean-Marc Gemperle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This howto is great, I' m quite new to linux and have poor networking
> knowledge but it get me this feature working first try on RH6.
>
> http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.77.html
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Marc Gemperle
>
> Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7r3gul$ioh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I found that this article
> > http://www.bynari.com/lcsrc.org/fwconsulting.html )contains the
minimum
> you
> > need to get started. After that check out the IPCHAINS-HOWTO to add
> > refinements.
> >
> > Regards
> > Bill Colvin
> >
> > Anders Peterson wrote in message <7r2vbn$c3u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >I (will soon) have a small network sharing an ADSL connection via a
> > >Linux server. Can anyone point me to a description of how to set
up IP
> > >masquerading on that server?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
/Anders
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Lew)
Subject: Re: DSL - Linux tools to check connection speed
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 23:10:08 GMT
I've gotten 350k to 450k depending on file size; I forgot,
but it takes me about a 2-3 megs of the file to reach 380k+.
BUT, have gotten 3.1k from a site that must have been using
a 28.8k modem to connect to the internet.
Probably the best bet is to use a site you think has a hi speed
internet connection, e.g. www.cdrom.com or the sunsite(?) maybe.
On Wed, 08 Sep 1999 12:42:35 -0700, Ken Brameld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all:
>
>I recently fell prey to the need for a faster internet connection and
>signed up for PacBell's DSL. However, it seems that I'm not getting
>anywhere close to the connection speeds advertised (surprise, surprise,
>eh?). Using FTP in the dead of night as a gauge of max speed possible,
>I got the following speeds for a 6.5 Mb file (done in triplicate):
>
>download - (384 Kbps advertised) 147.83 Kbps, 151.56 Kbps, 150.69 Kbps
>upload - (128 Kbps advertised) 13.22 Kbps, 14.03 Kbps, 13.28 Kbps
>
>I contacted PacBell and was told my "connection speeds may vary due to
>internet congestion." This is kind of a lame response and I would like
>to track connection speeds in greater detail to identify bottlenecks
>(i.e. where's the slow down, my computer --> Alcatel modem --> PacBell
>central office --> ISP --> world ?).
>
>What tools are available in Linux to do this? Should I be looking for
>problems with configuration of my network card (especially RE the slow
>upload)? I've used the "traceroute" command, but I'm not sure how to
>interpret the output. What sort of speed in ms is good? What's bad?
>
>Thanks,
>-Ken
>
>###################### Additional Info ################################
>SUSE 6.1
>Alcatel 1000 DSL Modem
>Kingston KNE100TX 10/100 network card
>tulip v0.91 driver
>
>Example output from traceroute to same host as I used for FTP:
>
>traceroute to xxx.ucsf.edu, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 adsl-xxxxxx.dsl.pacbell.net (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 15 ms 22 ms 17 ms
> 2 core1-fe5-0-0.snfc21.pbi.net (206.171.134.130) 12 ms 13 ms 13 ms
> 3 edge1-fa11-1-0.snfc21.pbi.net (209.232.130.2) 25 ms 26 ms 23 ms
> 4 sfra1-so-1-0.ca.us.prserv.net(165.87.161.74) 18 ms 21 ms 19 ms
> 5 ibr01-p5-2.sntc03.exodus.net (209.185.249.245) 21 ms 22 ms 16 ms
> 6 bbr02-g4-0.sntc03.exodus.net (216.33.153.66) 21 ms 21 ms 22 ms
> 7 bbr02-p5-0.irvn01.exodus.net (216.32.173.206) 45 ms 32 ms 34 ms
> 8 dcr03-g6-0.irvn01.exodus.net (216.33.164.3) 31 ms 31 ms 28 ms
> 9 vlan950.irvn01.exodus.net (216.33.164.131) 31 ms 31 ms 42 ms
>10 irca-xgty.ucnet.net (209.185.207.110) 36 ms 45 ms 38 ms
>11 igty-H10-0-0-T3.ucnet.net (192.35.216.109) 30 ms 28 ms 30 ms
>12 bgty-H8-0-0-T3.ucnet.net (192.35.219.45) 37 ms 33 ms 34 ms
>13 sfgty-A5-0-0-1.ucnet.net (192.35.219.18) 36 ms 36 ms 33 ms
>14 192.35.221.49 (192.35.221.49) 33 ms 31 ms 36 ms
>15 cgl.ucsf.edu (128.218.xxx.xx) 33 ms 31 ms 35 ms
>16 xxx.ucsf.edu (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 31 ms 32 ms 31 ms
>
>#######################################################################
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Windows using PPP
Date: 9 Sep 1999 13:23:28 -0500
Dustin Puryear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am looking for information on how to easily setup our Linux server
> to let Windows machines connect via dial-up networking. I believe
> Windows uses PAP, but some of our other machines using PPP do not.
> Basically, I would like the machine to be abe to let Windows users
> log-in using simple dial-up networking, and have our other Linux
> machines use regular PPP logins using prompts.
> Any HOW-TO's? I reviewed the PPP-HOWTO but it wasn't very specific.
> Also, I am wondering how to have PAP use the existing passwd
> information instead of having to update a secrets file everytime we
> add a user?
Would it be satisfactory to use a shell script as the login shell in
/etc/passwd for the Win users that was similar to
# ppp-only - Script to use as login shell for PPP only access.
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/sbin/pppd crtscts proxyarp nodetach require-pap login \
192.168.0.1:192.168.0.2
plus the already mentioned
* * "" *
line in /etc/pap-secrets?
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife.
Use =} to wrap paragraphs in vi. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Setting the source IP address
Date: 9 Sep 1999 12:46:34 GMT
I have a machine with three IP addresses on a single NIC. As load picks
up I will move to additional machines, but right now they all sit as
aliases on the one machine.
I have to establish sockets to other machines which use wrappers. They
don't want entries for all IP addresses, as a security issue. The
question is, when I am initiating a connect to a remote machine and have
aliases, how do I force the connect to be "from" one IP rather than
another.
I played with routing and managed to get into a few loops, hopefully
there's an easier way than using an ipchain to drop outgoing packets
into user space and diddle them!
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"So let it be written, so let it be dumb." Pharaoh Dufus the last...
------------------------------
From: Douglas Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mount: RPC: Program not registered?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 16:41:14 +0000
Would someonne tell me whaqt this means?
Thanks
--
Cheers, dn
Douglas Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===============================================================
National Wilms Tumor Study Group 206.667.4283
Seattle, WA
------------------------------
From: "Herminio Alvarez, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NetWare for Linux
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:11:49 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Folks:
If I had NetWare for Linux from Caldera, could that replace my
existing NFS for NetWare? Meaning, could I enable NFS on that NetWare
for Linux box, could NDS users access that NFS filesystem?
--
*** There is no great genius without a touch of madness ***
------------------------------
From: "Zsolt Mate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnet program for win98
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 19:15:10 +0200
> > does anyone know of a good telnet program for win98 that works as good
> > as telnet from linux terminal. i can telnet in fine using start-run-
> > telnet but when i bring up mc on the remote host several functions dont
> > work. since i'm a newbie to linux, mc is very useful for configuring my
> > linux server. thanks
http://www.dccs.com.au/~dave/dtelnet.html
Zsolt
------------------------------
From: John Murtari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel 2.2.5-22 SMP/ Hang under high traffic load?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 12:22:45 -0400
Folks,
We are running RedHat 6 with the 2.2.5-22 (SMP) in a file
server configuration. Ultra-SCSI disks and 3C905b network card.
In the past several weeks we have experienced to system "hangs", i.e.
no console response (not even ctl-alt-del), no net response, no
logging -- only recovered by a hard reset.
They seem to occur during periods of high network traffic. It is
of GREAT management concern -- anyone have any experience with this,
good solutions. We hate to try a random kernel upgrade -- have
been considering 2.2.11.
Best regards!
--
John
____________________________________________________________________
Customer Service Software Workshop Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (315) 635-1968(x-211) "software that fits!" (TM)
http://www.thebook.com/
------------------------------
From: Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Synchronizing time between server.
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 15:31:13 GMT
You could use rdate in a cron job (say daily).
I use something like rdate -s -p tock.usno.navy.mil
which adjusts the time based on the us national observatory
atomic clock.
Chuck
kfhassan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I synchronize the time between two Linux servers without using
> something complicated as ntp? Is it possible to synchronize time with
> an NT machine (either direction is okay)?
>
> Thanks,
> Khurram,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with Kingston VP10/100 & SuSE 6.1
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 18:27:19 GMT
Hello,
I've been having some problems getting my network card to work under
Linux.
Here's what I'm running
HP Pavilion 4463
SuSE 6.1 (currently running kernel 2.0.36 (I could also run 2.2.5 if
needed, I've been trying everything to get this to work)
tulip driver 0.89H
KNE110TX EtheRx VP PCI 10/100 Fast Ethernet Adapter
I configured everything using Yast, and when I boot up I get this:
Setting up network device eth0
The PCI BIOS has not enabled this device! updating PCI command
0004 -> 0005
tulip.c:v0.89H 5/23/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eth0: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC at 0x1400, C00a2d f0 42 84, IRQ 255
eth0: MII tranceiver found at MDIO address 1, 3100 status 7829
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource Temporarily unavailable
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource Temporarily unavailable failed
When I was running kernel 2.2.5 I would get pretty much the same
message. It would scroll off the screen before I could read it all,
but the "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource Temporarily unavailable" stuff was
there.
Any help would be welcomed.
Thanks
andy j.
------------------------------
From: "Colin Reinhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: 2nd NIC not recognized
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:41:14 -0700
I've got to TrendNet NE2000-compatible ISA cards set at the following:
eth0 io=0x300 irq=3
eth1 io=ox320 irq=10
In my conf.modules I added:
alias eth0 ne
alias eth1 ne
options ne io=0x300,0x320 irq=3,10
I have also un-commented the line in rc.modules
/sbin/modprobe ne
When El Slaucho (Slackware 4.0) boots, it detects 1 nic, the one at io=0x300
and irq=3.
The other one doesn't show up.
I've tried passing the following parameters to LILO on boot
LILO reserve=0x300,64
What should I try next, oh wise and gracious ones?
- Colin
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
