Linux-Networking Digest #530, Volume #12 Thu, 9 Sep 99 17:14:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: PROBLEM : executing a remote file using NFS =( (Denise Berendes)
RH6.0 and DSL ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Dial-in from Win95 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: SIOCFIFFLAGS et al (Peter Buelow)
Re: Linux friendly ISPs (bill davidsen)
Re: SSH (Chris Mahmood)
from Linux to internet using Windows NT 4sp4 (Pepi Strafforello)
Re: multi-link ppp (Ken McCord)
Re: ip_alias.o (Peter Buelow)
Re: Need help with route (Peter Buelow)
Re: NFS mounting Linux 2.2.9 on Irix 6.5 (Denise Berendes)
Networking ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ipchains... (Peter Buelow)
Re: Why do I sometimes get UDP packets from sites such as icq.com and (Peter Buelow)
Re: How to- get Linux to see Win98 Network? (Peter Buelow)
Re: Windows using PPP (Dustin Puryear)
ADSL + Cisco Commander + Linux: possible?
Re: How to find out what is wrong? (Peter Buelow)
Re: ipchains -L -M question (bill davidsen)
how to make ADSL connection under linux ? (Steven Wu)
IP Forwarding ("John Roberts")
Re: IP Masquerading trivia (Shmaque)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Denise Berendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM : executing a remote file using NFS =(
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 14:04:46 -0500
I've had problems similar to that when the mount point didn't
have correct permissions. Try unmounting the disk & see what
the permissions are underneath.
Denise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I�m running NFS+NIS, I can read and write from the NFS client, but I
> can�t execute the file. The error message is:
> bash: /sharedDir/file permission denied
> Any ideas?
> PLEASE HELP ME =(
> Fabian
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RH6.0 and DSL
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 15:48:21 GMT
Greetings:
Need help with ethernet/DSL configuration on
RH6.0.
have static ip address
have gateway address (on same network as my
static)
have name server addresses.
Eth0 is up and running. can ping myself, but cant
ping gateway.
netstat -r=
Destination gateway genmask iface
my.static.ip.# * 255.255.255.255 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 lo
default isp gtwy# 0.0.0.0 eth0
Nothing gets out of the ADSL modem.
ANy1 config'd dsl and Linux?
and yes my isp allows unix dsl connections.
Thanx in advance...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A man. A plan. A canal. LINUX!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dial-in from Win95
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 19:13:49 GMT
Thanks for your reply.
>
> > * Do I need Auto PPPP for this?
>
> Yes.
So a PPP connection is made *after* the initial SLIP dial-in?
>
> > * My Linux box is standalone, no DNS -- is this OK?
>
> Sure. You just need nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf, "man 5 resolver"
My stuff in resolv.conf points to Compuserve name servers on the
Internet. Is this OK? And does the Client Win95 PC need an IP address?
If so, how is that done?
> Try this URL:
>
> http://www.swcp.com/~jgentry/dialin2.html
>
This is the one I am using. I can get it all working up to about half
way, when we come to AutoPPP and CHAP.
At the moment the dial-in is failing on authentication. I even tried
"root" in my DUN setup, without success.
Michael
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SIOCFIFFLAGS et al
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 12:14:42 -0500
k vranes wrote:
>
> I'm running redhat 6 with a 3com509 card that has been working stable for
> a while. Last night a Netscape froze GNOME so hard that I could only
> telnet in from another box and reboot the machine (not even killing the
> Netscape or X processes released the screen, which I found odd).
>
> Upon rebooting, networking is now toast. All local networking runs fine,
> eth0 comes up without error while running /etc/rc.d/inet.d/network start,
> but trying to telnet outside gives an immediate 'Host name lookup
> failure.'
>
> although eth0 *seems* to come up, running netstat -nr shows only the lo
> interface info. running
>
> ifconfig eth0
>
> gives good info, except the broadcast info is wrong. However, trying to
> config that with:
>
> ifconfig eth0 broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> gives SIOCFIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
>
> I've also seen error messages with SIOCADDR in them.
>
> Anybody know what's going on? This happened completely out of the blue
> and it's the second time. (The first time I reinstalled after 2 solid
> days of hacking on --- I don't want to do that again.)
>
> thanks
Try an ifconfig without arguments and see if eth0 is shown. If not, it
is not properly configured. Does dmesg give you any info or errors? And
can you ping the IP address of eth0? This is a bit odd, and I am not
familiar with the problem so I can't say for sure, but it sounds as if
you have lost the card. It is possible that the NIC just died. If so,
that would account for the problem as the driver might still load and it
might look good, but nothing works. Go out and get a cheap tulip or
realtek chipset card and give that a try. PCI NIC's are cheap now, but I
am assuming you are in the U.S., but if not, they are still probably
cheap. In the order of $20 or so for the lowest end. Don't buy 3Com or
Intel anyway. Good Luck.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: Linux friendly ISPs
Date: 9 Sep 1999 14:41:21 GMT
In article <Svlz3.473$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Todd K. Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I have been trying to get a Linux PPP connection to go for 3 days straight
| now. Probably well over 30 hours of fruitless trial and error. It seems like
| it should be simple connect, but trying every combination, trick and stupid
| trick, it just sits there. Of course I can configure a connection with a
| Windows or Mac in under a minute. Probably most ISPs can connect up a Linux
| PPP, except it soooooooooooooo @#$%@#^&^ ridiculously hard that it's not
| worth the effort.
Why don't you post the actual chat command from your ppp connect script
and the output in the log (usually debug) from chat. Post your whole ppp
options script and let us look at it. I'm not about to guess what you're
doing wrong from something you do by hand, I want to see the whole ppp
connect including the chat command.
| The connection behaves exactly this way with minicom or a terminal program
| (without the quotes and commas of course):
|
| I Dial in,
| Get "Connect 2X000/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS",
| I hit <Enter>,
| I get "Username:",
| I enter my username and hit <enter>,
| I get "Password:",
| I enter my password and hit <enter>,
| I get a ">" prompt,
| I enter the command "ppp",
| I get PPP characters,
| Again, I don't think it's ISP being Linux "Friendly", it's the crappy chat
| scripts that are ridiculously hard. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The scripts are extremely simple, so much so that many people can't
believe it and crap them up with "extras" which confuse the issue, extra
RETURNs being a favorite.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"So let it be written, so let it be dumb." Pharaoh Dufus the last...
------------------------------
From: Chris Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SSH
Date: 08 Sep 1999 21:00:38 -0700
"Nathan T. Lager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyone
> have any similar probelms?
What problems? Why can't you install ssh?
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Pepi Strafforello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: from Linux to internet using Windows NT 4sp4
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 19:01:18 +0200
Hi folks!
I have a small eterogeneous network, with MS Windows, Linux, Solaris and
Macintosh workstations on the same LAN and partition; there is a NT 4 sp
4 domain server that act as a TCP/IP gateway.
I configured TCP/IP on all of these machines, addressing the server as
the default gateway.
I activated the "forward IP packets" option on the server.
The MS PC did not get out of my LAN until I installed both server and
client sides of a thing called "MS Proxy Server 2.0". Obviously, I have
no such thing on Linux, Solaris or Mac.
I would like to connect to the Internet not only from Windows PCs, and I
definitely don't care about controlling the accesses to the Internet or
caching pages on the server.
Is it possible?
Cheers!
------------------------------
From: Ken McCord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: multi-link ppp
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 15:38:29 -0400
Here's two links, one for the EQL package and one for MLPPP support.
Haven't tried them, so YMMV.
Ken
http://home.indyramp.com/eql/eql.html#toc6
http://linux-mp.terz.de/
Octyl wrote:
>
> Searching for the same answer here......switching to linux and I have
> gotten used to the mppp speeds in w98
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:10:11 -0400, "jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I would like to multi-link (ppp) two analog modems on my linux box to my
> >cisco 2500series router at work. Due to phone line quality at work I can
> >only connect at 26.4, so I would like to be able to utilize two modems to
> >increase productivity. I am unfamiliar with this subject, but my sysadmin
> >has agreed to help on the router side. So my question is how do I set up
> >the linux (client, dial-out) box? I am using US Robotics modems, SuSE6.1
> >and kernel 2.2.9. Any help would be greatly appreciated. TIA
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ip_alias.o
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:00:13 -0500
Dj Browne wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> Probably a simple answer....
>
> I am trying to set one NIC to have 2 ip's ....one external and one in the
> 192.168.0.x private range.
>
> I keep getting the 'no such device' error because I guess I do not have
> IP_ALIASing set in the kernal. from what I understand I can load this with
> a module called ip-alias.o
>
> I cannot seem to find this file or the source anywhere....can some one
> (any one !!!) please send this to me for a 2.2.6 kernel?
>
> Thanks
> dj
You are going to have to compile the module or compile it in to the
kernel. If it isn't compiled in (module or otherwise), then even if
someone sent it to you, it wouldn't work. Sorry, but that is life.
Anyway, check /lib/modules/2.2.6/net or /lib/modules/2.2.6/misc to see
if it is there. If so, you are in luck. Then if you have it, do this
'insmod ip-alias' to install it into the kernel.
BTW, the source is in /usr/src/linux. From there to build a new
kernel, run make menuconfig or in X, run make xconfig. Good luck.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need help with route
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:03:46 -0500
Brad Frazer wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Here's my problem. I'm running slakware 4.0 (kernel 2.26) and have
> compiled all networking options (including IP fwd and masq) into the
> kernel.
>
> I am trying to get IP forwarding to work with my cable modem. I have
> two generic NE2000 cards installed and they seem to be working fine.
> When I configure the second card with ifconfig (ifconfig eth1
> 10.0.0.1)it appears to be ok but when I try to enter the intranet in the
> routing table with
>
> route add -net 10.0.0.0 eth1
> I get:
> SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
>
> The routing table appears as follows however:
>
> Destination Gateway GenMask flags
> Metric Ref use Iface
> 10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
> U 0 0 0 eth1
> loopback * 255.0.0.0
> U 0 0 0 lo
>
> (I have disabled the dhcpcd for this example)
>
> Is the network entered properly? If so why don't I see the 10.0.0.1 from
> the ifconfig command? I guess its obvious but I want to make a subnet
> with 10.0.0.1 as a gateway. I am stuck here and I'm pretty new to linux
> so can anyone help? TIS
>
> Brad
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try, route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 eth1
This should work! Good Luck.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: Denise Berendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS mounting Linux 2.2.9 on Irix 6.5
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:15:21 -0500
You have to mount it using nfs2, not just nfs. Example of fstab
entry:
linuxmachine:/disk1 /disk1 nfs2 rw,soft,nosuid,intr,bg 0 0
Denise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to mount a Linux 2.2.9 system on an Irix 6.5 box using nfs.
> I matched the nfs versions, read the deja postings, but I get an error
> saying "Program not registered". DOes this mean nfsd is not running? "ps
> aux" says it is.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Mihir
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Networking
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 19:33:44 GMT
I have just started using Linux, and my wife runs windows98. I was
wondering where I could find info on what I need to hook these two
together to share printers, and hard drives etc. I want to do this
mostly as a learning experience. Any help is appreciatred,
Ross Jones
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains...
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:10:37 -0500
Jimmy Lio wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me what tcp, ucp and syn are? How should I configure
> ipchains so that no clients on my private network can access the server
> via telnet? (Say, my server has address 192.168.1.1, and my clients
> have address 192.168.1.X...) What should I put into ipchains if I want
> a particular (say the one with IP 192.168.1.Y) client to have access via
> telnet?
>
> Jimmy
Sounds like you have the wrong idea. ipchains is a utility which will
allow a group of privatly networked computers (your 192.168.1.* network)
to access the internet from a single connection on a linux box. If you
want to block telnet access to certain computers, then you have to setup
tcpd and hosts.deny to make this work. Do a man tcpd on your server to
see how this works. Good luck.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do I sometimes get UDP packets from sites such as icq.com and
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:13:38 -0500
"Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote:
>
> Everyday, I can see in my /var/log/messages that rejected UDP packets
> originating from hosts such as icq.icq.com or fes-d020.icq.aol.com from
> these two hosts' port 4000. Is this normal?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Salvo
I would believe so. Nothing to worry about as millions are using the
stuff and aren't complaining about how ICQ uses TCP or UDP. Check out
the sites dealing with ICQ hacking to understand how the ICQ protocol
works. I am sorry, but I don't have the sites in front of me right now,
so I can't provide an exact answer, but I wouldn't worry about it.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to- get Linux to see Win98 Network?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:56:37 -0500
PC 2 wrote:
>
> How do I get 4 machines running Windows 98 to see Linux <RH5.2> on a
> 10base-T network?
www.samba.org
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dustin Puryear)
Subject: Re: Windows using PPP
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 14:01:37 GMT
On 9 Sep 1999 01:41:02 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh) wrote:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dustin Puryear) writes:
>
>]I am looking for information on how to easily setup our Linux server
>]to let Windows machines connect via dial-up networking. I believe
>]Windows uses PAP, but some of our other machines using PPP do not.
>
>All Linux machines can use pap
>(see axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html)
Yep.. however, we have a few Linux machines at remote branches out
there that use prompt logins instead of pap. I suppose I could
reconfigure them. I was just trying to avoid having to fix something
that ain't broke.
>
>]Basically, I would like the machine to be abe to let Windows users
>]log-in using simple dial-up networking, and have our other Linux
>]machines use regular PPP logins using prompts.
>Why? Use pap for all!
>And use AutoPPP in mgetty (/etc/mgetty*/login.config)
>
>
>]Any HOW-TO's? I reviewed the PPP-HOWTO but it wasn't very specific.
>]Also, I am wondering how to have PAP use the existing passwd
>]information instead of having to update a secrets file everytime we
>]add a user?
>
>login
>option to pppd
>and
>* * '' *
>in /etc/ppp/pap-secrets file
>(Read man pppd)
>
Any word on not having to edit the secrets file everytime we add a
user?
---
Dustin Puryear
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: ADSL + Cisco Commander + Linux: possible?
Date: 9 Sep 1999 17:18:58 GMT
Hello,
I've got DSL through US West, both the line and as my internet provider.
Because my area is new to DSL, I was only able to sign up for something
called the "select" program, meaning that I have to use Cisco Commander to
login to my provider, which then gives me net access for 2 hours. After 2
hours expire, I must reconnect if I wish to get back on the internet.
Everything works well under Windows. Now I'd like to use Linux.
Does anyone know of a way that I can login to US West under Linux? If I
login via Windows and reboot to Linux, everything works fine for 2 hours,
then I must reboot to windows, login again, then go back to linux. This
is tedious and not a desirable solution. Does anyone know of any way to
logon to the internet under Linux? I haven't tried running Cisco Commander
under WINE yet, but my suspicions are that this won't work.
Inside my machine is a 3com 3C905 ethernet card. This plugs into my
external Cisco 675 router. I've thought about setting up an old windows
machine to act as my login machine, then have my linux box networked to
this. I'd rather not do this, however, since I'm fairly tight on space
(not to mention I'd have to buy a few components to get the old machine
working properly).
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Henry
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to find out what is wrong?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:49:43 -0500
Daniel O'Neill wrote:
>
> I am connecting a notebook with Mandrake 6 to a NT/Novell network
> (TCP/IP & IPX). The PCMCIA network card appears to be operating fine.
> I am absolutely at a loss as to why this computer will not connect to
> the network. I checked the box for "DHCP" in Linuxconf.
>
> =NOTICE TO BULK E-MAILERS PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE
> BULK E-MAILING THIS ADDRESS=
> Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, p.227, any and all
> non-solicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a
> download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. Anyone who sends
> unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account will be charged a $500
> proofreading fee. Consider this official notification. Failure to abide
> by this will result in legal action.
> For a complete summary of this Legislation see
>
> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:SN01618:@@@D
>
> http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/227.html
Well, http://www.linux.org/help/index.html is a good place to start.
More importantly, you need to give some more info. Is the network card
module being loaded when you insert the card? Is the network being
started. Does DHCP time out without getting an IP or what? You need to
post a little more info. Do a dmesg and see what is happening. Try
running dhcp on your own after making sure it isn't already running. ps
x for dhcpcd or dhcp as root. Also, make sure DHCP isn't starting up
when you start the machine. Write a small script that is executed when
cardservices installs a card. Good luck and post some more info for
better trouble shooting.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: ipchains -L -M question
Date: 9 Sep 1999 14:12:55 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Vlar Schreidlocke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What would I need WINS for anyway? Is it required by Samba or anything
| else that might be important?
I believe you need it so that your Win9x boxen will see the SAMBA
machine(s) in your network as part of the 'Network Neighborhood.'
However, you will still be able to mount SAMBA shares from the DOS
command line, and DNS will work.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"So let it be written, so let it be dumb." Pharaoh Dufus the last...
------------------------------
From: Steven Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to make ADSL connection under linux ?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 16:23:48 GMT
hi,
i used ADSL connect to internet in windows 95. now i want make it works
in my linux box (slackware 4.0).
my ADSL modem come from alcatel (www.alcatel.com), which connect to my
home network by a ethenet interface. to establish ADSL connection, my
isp give me a WinPoET software from iVation to play as a dial-up client
in win95. without it, the connection can not be established. you can
find information about this software on www.ivation.com. but i'm so
sad, ivation did not give any linux/unix solution. now, how can i get
internet working under linux?
anyone has experience about this? i hope you understand what i said.
thanks in advance.
--
steven wu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "John Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Forwarding
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 20:11:16 GMT
I'm trying to setup a Redhat Linux box (Redhat 5.2) as a gateway machine. I
have 2 ethernet cards installed, each configured with separate network
addresses. Much of the documentation on this subject I've read states that
this is easy, just configure both interfaces separately and give them their
respective IP addresses and off you go. Unfortunately its not working for
me.
I basically have 2 subnets: 192.168.0.0 and 192.168.1.0. I can ping out
from the gateway box to machines on either network. I can ping the gateway
box (either address) from any machine on either network. I cannot, however,
ping from a box on one subnet to a box on the other subnet. Have I
forgotten/screwed-up something or oversimplified this?
Below is the ifconfig -a and netstat -rn outputs from this box. Any
suggestions would be welcome at this point.
Thanks,
- John R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IFCONIG -a:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:C8:A0:0D
inet addr:192.168.0.95 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:562 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x1000
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:C8:A0:19
inet addr:192.168.1.95 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:229 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:3 Base address:0x1080
NETSTAT -rn:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.95 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
eth0
------------------------------
From: Shmaque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading trivia
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 16:31:13 GMT
Jonas Anden wrote:
>
> >try using passive transfers on your ftp client...
>
> Sure, that is an option. Unfortunately, the users that needs to connect to
> the server have (to put it nicely) er skills, and many FTP programs do not
> even support passive mode...
>
> // Judge
>
>
-Judge does have a good point here... In fact, I'm having exactly the same problem...
As I recall, however, I tried passive transfers to no avail. Also, it is worthy to
note that when I boot into windows, a single-threaded ftp server (such as ServU) works
perfectly. Could this be solved by using a different server than WU-Ftpd??
-Shmaque
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
