Linux-Networking Digest #601, Volume #12 Wed, 15 Sep 99 17:14:00 EDT
Contents:
Re: gettng an ss10 to speak serially to a PC-style modem (Eric Edwards)
Re: Recommendation for 100Mbps Switched Ethernet hardware (David C.)
Re: Installing 2 NIC both pcnet32? (Ahmed Hassan)
Re: inverse dialup... (Jeff Keenan)
3c90x: new 3com GPL driver ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Test ether connection (Josh Flechtner)
Re: A Challenge (Where to get MuLinux) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: IP MASQ / Link lights ("Garrick Strom")
Re: Dial in PPP -- the next step (Bill Unruh)
Re: Pinging Question/Prob (Lew Pitcher)
How can I connect 10Base2 and 10BaseT machines? (Frank McKenney)
NFS error: unknown function nfssvc (Frank Loewenthal)
diald-0.99.1 make problem? ("Kurt R. Hoehn")
Re: AutoPPP and assigning ip numbers based on port! (Bill Unruh)
Pinging Question/Prob (RobertSimmons)
Re: A How configure sendmail without a permanent domain name? (Philip Brown)
Re: Dial-on-demand and time limits (David C.)
Re: Does AOL support Linux connection? (Iain Georgeson)
Possible to limit # of connections to a port? (Alan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Edwards)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Subject: Re: gettng an ss10 to speak serially to a PC-style modem
Date: 15 Sep 1999 18:18:30 GMT
On 15 Sep 1999 10:22:20 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm trying to hook up my sparcstation 10 to the world via its serial
>port and a PC-style modem (an USR Imodem).
>
>However I'm beginning to suspect that the straight through db25M-db25M
>cable I'm using is not what is required. Anybody out there with advice
>on pinouts etc?
The straight through cable should be just fine. That's what I used to
connect my Sparc 10 to a USR Courier "V.everything".
What kind of problems are you having?
--
Real courtesy requires human effort and understanding.
Never let your machine or your habit send courtesy copies.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David C.)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking
Subject: Re: Recommendation for 100Mbps Switched Ethernet hardware
Date: 15 Sep 1999 14:15:00 -0400
Bryan <Bryan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In comp.os.linux.networking David C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Ricardo Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> Depends of
>>>
>>> - the size of the network you are running
>>> - The traffic
>>> - the number of servers
>>> - your budget
>>>
>>> Switches come in a variety of specs. I run a mix of HP (cheap and
>>> simple.. not very fast, good for small branches) and Bay Networks
>>> for heavy traffic... specially for our server room and large
>>> headquarters... flexible...expensive..but monsters.
>>
>> Yep. You can get cheap 4-port unmanaged switches for around $100.
>
> -switches- or dual speed (dual segment) repeated hubs?
>
> cheapest I've seen is the bay unit (something '104' as the model #)
> for about $165.
>
> if there's truly a 10/100 switch for $100, I'd like to know!
Let's see here. Searching through the Data Comm Warehouse catalog for
cheap switches,
(http://www.warehouse.com/DataComm/Networking/HubsConcentrators/Switching/)
I found some:
Addtron Technologies 5 port 10/100 switch for $100
Allied Telesyn AT-FS203 (2-port 10/100) for $100
Linksys EtherFast 10/100 2-port for $100
There are several more (with 2-10 ports) if you're willing to go up to
the $165 price that you've seen.
Now, these switches are unmanaged, and may not have enough bandwidth to
go around if all ports get saturated with 100M traffic at once. But
they're definitely not repeaters.
-- David
------------------------------
From: Ahmed Hassan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Installing 2 NIC both pcnet32?
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:24:45 GMT
I am posting this in case someone has the same problem.
I figured out the problem.
There was a bug in the pcnet32 driver. The driver returns after the
detecting the first driver.
The buggy driver is version: 1.11 17.1.99
This was fixed. I am now using v1.21 31.3.99.
In article <7rmk0i$91c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ahmed Hassan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install 2 PCI ethernet cards on a RH6.0 system.
> Linux starts the first ethernet card correctly but when starting
> the second card I get "Delaying eth1 initialization"
>
> Both cards are the same brand and model. They both are functional.
> Linux can start them separately but once both are in the computer
> only one starts up.
>
> The drivers are loaded as modules. The PCI subsystem is recognizing
> the cards as ethernet cards but for some reason the pcnet32 driver
> is only loading the driver for one of the card not both.
> Any ideas?? Does the pcnet32 driver have any parameters to load more
> than one ethernet card?? Does it support more than one ethernet card.
>
> Thanks,
> Ahmed
>
> The content of conf.modules are:
>
> alias eth0 pcnet32
> alias eth1 pcnet32
> alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
> pre-install pcmcia_core /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcmcia start
>
> The relevant content of /proc/pci are: ( PCI recognizes both cards )
>
> Bus 0, device 6, function 0:
> Ethernet controller: AMD 79C970 (rev 22).
> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 11. Master
> Capable. Latency=48. Min Gnt=6.Max Lat=255.
> I/O at 0x4020 [0x4021].
> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0x80000020 [0x80000020].
> Bus 0, device 11, function 0:
> Ethernet controller: AMD 79C970 (rev 22).
> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 9. Master
> Capable. Latency=48. Min Gnt=6.Max Lat=255.
> I/O at 0x4000 [0x4001].
> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0x80000000 [0x80000000].
>
> The content of /proc/interrupts are: ( no IRQ conflicts )
> CPU0
> 0: 24746 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 924 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 8: 2 XT-PIC rtc
> 11: 25 XT-PIC PCnet/PCI II 79C970A
> 12: 0 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
> 13: 1 XT-PIC fpu
> 14: 35857 XT-PIC ide0
> NMI: 0
>
> The content of ioports are:
>
> 0000-001f : dma1
> 0020-003f : pic1
> 0040-005f : timer
> 0060-006f : keyboard
> 0070-007f : rtc
> 0080-008f : dma page reg
> 00a0-00bf : pic2
> 00c0-00df : dma2
> 00f0-00ff : fpu
> 01f0-01f7 : ide0
> 02f8-02ff : serial(auto)
> 03c0-03df : vga+
> 03f6-03f6 : ide0
> 03f8-03ff : serial(auto)
> 4020-4037 : PCnet/PCI II 79C970A
> ffa0-ffa7 : ide0
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Keenan)
Subject: Re: inverse dialup...
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:24:17 GMT
try winroute pro it implements nat on windoze nt 98 etc it works well
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3c90x: new 3com GPL driver
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:16:46 GMT
Has anyone had any interaction with the new 3c90x driver from 3com?
(not that 3c59x driver shipped with the systems)...
It was released a few days ago...
I've had some issues with ifdown not working on it...
Anyone had these too?
Vaevictus Asmadi
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Josh Flechtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test ether connection
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:43:47 -0700
==============5B7AFAC5123D178291040E91
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello group.
I am running a Linux RH6.0 server and am using Samba to (try) talk
to the Win boxes here at the office. The Server came direct from Dell
with the ethernet card preinstalled and on LILO boot it does not
recognize it and subsequently fails. I must type ifconfig eth0
192.168.0.1 to activate the ether-connection. From this point how can I
tell if the card is active and is capable of recieiving a signal from
the hub and vice-versa?? I've tried everything in both smb.conf and the
Windows machines to try and get the server to show in 'Network
Neighboorhood' and no luck. Always met with an "Unable to browse
network......." dialog box. Hence I suspect a hardware glitch.
Thank you in advance!
Josh Flechtner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============5B7AFAC5123D178291040E91
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Hello group.
<p> I am running a Linux RH6.0 server and am using Samba
to (try) talk to the Win boxes here at the office. The Server came direct
from Dell with the ethernet card preinstalled and on LILO boot it does
not recognize it and subsequently fails. I must type <i>ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1</i>
to activate the ether-connection. From this point how can I tell if the
card is active and is capable of recieiving a signal from the hub and vice-versa??
I've tried everything in both smb.conf and the Windows machines to try
and get the server to show in 'Network Neighboorhood' and no luck. Always
met with an "Unable to browse network......." dialog box. Hence I suspect
a hardware glitch.
<p>Thank you in advance!
<p>Josh Flechtner
<br><a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a></html>
==============5B7AFAC5123D178291040E91==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Challenge (Where to get MuLinux)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:32:27 GMT
You can find MuLinux at http://mulinux.nevalabs.org/
Have fun!
-Brett
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ricardo Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do you et that?
> TX
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7rjlnl$69f$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hey,
> > Try looking into MuLinux or Trinux. These are MiniLinux
distributions.
> > Both run on like 2 or 3 floppies (actually, you can do them with
just
> > one floppy, but you won't have many progs to play with).
> >
> > I currently run MuLinux on a 486/50 with 20MB of memory and NO hard
> > drive. Although it is limited in what it can do, it does IP
routing, IP
> > masquerading and all the IP filtering I need it to do. (I believe
it is
> > using IPchains.)
> >
> > Anyhow, look into it. These mini distributions are really neat and
REAL
> > simply to install. Heh, all I had to do was put the floppy in the
drive
> > and start my PC up.
> >
> > Good Luck!
> > -Brett
> >
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > A Challenge
> > > I have a 486 SX -25 mhz machine. with a 40mb HDD and a monochrome
> > video
> > > card (Hercules - Text only, pretty much)
> > > Would it be possible, to somehow get a version of something,
probably
> > > linux on to it, so it can just sit there and work as a firewall or
> > > tcpwrapper or whatever the hell you need to act as protection to
your
> > > system? The burning question is, will it be possible.. I can put a
> > 300mb
> > > HDD on it, but I would prefer to keep that one else where..
> > >
> > > --
> > > Aluminium makes up almost 8% of the earths crust.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Garrick Strom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP MASQ / Link lights
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:11:31 -0700
If you are going directly from the cablemodem to the NIC, you might need a
crossover cable. I know that my DSL router uses a crossover to go directly
to the PC, or into an uplink port on a hub.
Garrick Strom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kyle Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7rn0gp$baj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Here's the situation...I have a cable connection and i want to use
> a linux box as a router so that the rest of the house can use the net
> I think that my first problem is that the link light between the linux box
> and an internal computer don't light up....I have check the cards
> individually and they all work with the cable modem itself I have also
> switched between a few chunks of cat-5 cable with no avail....
> my second question is does anyone know where I can get a
> step-by-step tutorial on how to setup a router on a stock RH6.0
> install(with all updates) (I think that i have set it up correctly but I
> want to check...I have read the masqhow to and I think that i might need
> something more idiot proof..
>
> Help
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Dial in PPP -- the next step
Date: 15 Sep 1999 15:37:16 GMT
In <7ro0fu$7sm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
]I have set up my RedHat5.2 Linux box to accept dial up PPP connections
]from a remote Win95 client, using autoPPP.
]A couple of questions:
]* Using my browser on Win95, I can access Apache/Linux using http://IP
]address but not http://hostname. Do I need a caching nameserver or
]something? Do these work OK on a standalone box? Currently, the PPP
]options for the dial-up server have entries for external DNS lookup
]servers. Given that the Linux box only has one modem, how can it even
]use these anyway?
You have to tell Win, on thewin box, what the DNS servers are. Use the
same ones that your Linux machine uses (ie look in /etc/resolv.conf and
have the win machine use those.) I assume tht your Linux machine is on the
internet? If not-- ie if only these two computers are tied together, put
the name of the Linux machine and its IP into /etc/hosts.
]* Is there any way I can dial into the Linux box and get Apache to
]display a certain html page. i.e. You don't have to enter an http://...
]site address in the browser at the client side. Maybe some sort of ppp
]script?
Set up the home page on the win machine to point to the Linux machine.
It is not the http host who determines what the client looks at.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Pinging Question/Prob
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:48:06 GMT
What does your routing table look like? P'haps it's muddled up, and is routing
those packets out a real network interface.
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:44:52 -0400, RobertSimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
> I have a box running Redhat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36. I can ping the box
>from another machines but the box will not ping itself. it says:
>ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
>
>So , I tried the localhost and get:
>
>[sybase@snpkhomni02 sybase]$ ping 127.0.0.1
>PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
>
>--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
>15 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>
>
>Any ideas? Please copy [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as the newsgroup.
>
>Thanks,
>Robert
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant
Toronto Dominion Financial Group
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank McKenney)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.networking.misc
Subject: How can I connect 10Base2 and 10BaseT machines?
Date: 15 Sep 1999 19:11:09 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to hook a new machine into my current 10Base2 network, and
would appreciate hints, pointers, or appropriate search terms.
Current network:
- 'griffin': Linux (SuSE 5.3) on a 486DX4-100
EC-9400 (NE2000 clone) "combo" adapter: 10Base2, 10BaseT
- 'Office': OS/2 Warp4 on a Pentium(I) 100
EC-9400 adapter
- Cabling: 10Base2 (coax)
This works fine so far. I can run XFree86 as an X Server under OS/2 and
run X apps on 'griffin', the Linux box. I can ftp both ways with no
problems.
But... here's where it gets tricky. I want to attach a new machine, a
"loaner" HP SomethingOrOther of fairly recent vintage to the network.
Naturally, the HP's LAN adapter only has a 10Base[T] (twisted pair)
connector. What can I say? Murphy's visiting again (;-).
Ignoring the TCP/IP and NetBeui/TCPBeui configuration issues for the
moment (gotta save something for Murphy on his _next_ visit), is there
any way I can get the Ethernet hardware layer connection set up?
Possibilities:
1) A 10Base2-to-10BaseT "adapter". Does such a gadget exist, and if
so, is its price in a "reasonable" range (c. $20US)? I tried
AltaVista, but turned up too many false hits to continue. Seems
_lots_ of people talk about "adapter"s and 10BaseT and 10Base2 (;-).
2) Get a "crossover" cable and run it between the HP and the 10BaseT
connector on 'griffin's EC-9400. Will the adapter talk Ethernet out
of "both sides of its mouth", e.g. to both the 10Base2 AND the
10BaseT port?
3) Assuming my memory is still owrking properly, see if I can find what
might have been DB15-to-BNC connectors in my basement. If they turn
out to be "Thick" to "Thin" Ethernet adapters, see if I can hotwire
one into the adapter I need.
4) Install a 10Base2 ISA adapter in the HP, assuming the customer
doesn't have objections, and try to set up the appropriate device
driver wothout an NT Installation CD (the HP was "cloned" over the
customer's internal network). If I screw it up, well, the customer's
site is _only_ an hour's drive away... (;-)
Is there another possibility I'm overlooking here?
Is it possible that I can't do what I want the way I'd like to?
Comments and suggestions will be appreciated.
Frank McKenney, McKenney Associates
Richmond, Virginia / (804) 320-4887
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Frank Loewenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS error: unknown function nfssvc
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:19:06 +0200
Hi folks
I try to install NFS on a Redhat 6.0 with Kernel 2.2.12. I can not start the
nfs - daemon. I got allways the error message:
nfssvc: Function not implemented
Perhaps anybody knows whats going on? Thanks in advance
Frank
------------------------------
From: "Kurt R. Hoehn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diald-0.99.1 make problem?
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:59:16 -0400
Hello,
I installed diald-0.99.1.tar on my linux machine (distrabution RH 5.2)
and when I compiled it, it complained about the netlink.h in the proxy_tap.c
file not found. I did some searching around and found a netlink.h in the
/usr/src/linux/include/net dir so I copied it to the /usr/include/linux dir
and then the compiler really complained about structures and errored out on
a declaration not found "NETLINK_TAPBASE". Any help would be great.
Thank You
Kurt
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: AutoPPP and assigning ip numbers based on port!
Date: 15 Sep 1999 19:22:50 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dustin Puryear) writes:
>where aa.bb.cc.dd is the server and ww.xx.yy.zz is the client. But how
>does this work with AutoPPP? I can only specify one options file for
>AutoPPP to call when bringing up pppd, so how can I assign an ip
>address to each port?
AutoPPP does not call options files, pppd does.
man pppd
Options Files section
e, set up
/etc/ppp/options.ttyS1
etc.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:44:52 -0400
From: RobertSimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Pinging Question/Prob
Hello,
I have a box running Redhat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36. I can ping the box
from another machines but the box will not ping itself. it says:
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
So , I tried the localhost and get:
[sybase@snpkhomni02 sybase]$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Any ideas? Please copy [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as the newsgroup.
Thanks,
Robert
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: A How configure sendmail without a permanent domain name?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Sep 1999 19:39:34 GMT
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:13:02 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I have a computer with Caldera OpenLinux 2.2, at home. I haven't a
>permanent Internet connection - I connect to Internet through normal
>phone line. My provider (Polish Telecommunication) doesn't give
>permanent IP and domain addresses, so I can have different addresses at
>different occasions ...
>I want to use sendmail to sent my e-mails. In fact, I use Kmail
>configured to use sendmail. I have some e-mail addresses and accounts,
>all not related to tpnet.pl domain. In most cases, it works good but
>sometimes I receive errors, e.g:
Just use "Dmyour.domain.com"
or something like that, in the .cf file.
also see comp.mail.sendmail
--
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:SN01618:@@@D
The word of the day is mispergitude
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David C.)
Subject: Re: Dial-on-demand and time limits
Date: 15 Sep 1999 15:39:31 -0400
Linux_User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I've been running pppd in dial-on-demand mode for some time now, and
> there is just one little inconvenience I'm experiencing at equal time
> intervals.
>
> Every 480.1 min. my connection is dropped (it connects immediately
> back). I just want to know if this is a time limit built in the pppd
> daemon or it is my ISP limiting my connect time.
I don't know about pppd, since I never leave the line idle for that
long, but I know my ISP will cut-off connections that remain idle for
too long. I would be surprised if yours didn't have a similar policy -
it's fairly common.
-- David
------------------------------
From: Iain Georgeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Does AOL support Linux connection?
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:47:10 +0100
In article <oQbD3.8612$C7.201114@wards>, Stu.A
<[email protected]> writes
>A Linux user using AOL hosters of white hate sites generan depravity and poo
>image compresion in addition to resolving logins in the US(might have canged
>that).
>
>'AOL hatter' :-) theirs an anti netscape site how about anti AOL, the
>worst isp in the world(probably)
>
>My faverite isp's include f9 who have either a free service or a pay 10 a
>month get 0800 number access at the weekends or BT do a simmiler offer,
>demon seem relyable, prity mich any one but AOL(imho).
Can someone please Babelfish this into English?
Ta.
Iain.
--
So I think trying to direct Linux is like herding cats. Cats are not
motivated by anything resembling what motivates you, but if you get
enough cats, some portion of them will go the right direction just by
chance. -- Dave Taylor, responsible for Doom on Linux
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan)
Subject: Possible to limit # of connections to a port?
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:04:26 GMT
Is there a way to limit the number of connections to a particular port
no matter what is listening on that port? For example, if I have a
daemon I want to run on port 4500 but the program itself doesn't offer
a way to limit max connections...any way to use Linux itself to do
that?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
