Linux-Networking Digest #619, Volume #12         Fri, 17 Sep 99 08:13:35 EDT

Contents:
  Domain name for private subnet (Richard Townsend)
  Re: Serious Problem, Help me... (Raymond Hendrey)
  Re: big problems with network card - please help! ("Niel Dunnage")
  Re: linux networking ("dan Grass")
  Re: AutoPPP and assigning ip numbers based on port! (Dustin Puryear)
  Re: NFS error: unknown function nfssvc (Vilmos Soti)
  Newbie linux installation via NFS ("Blacka")
  Re: How to emulating network on single PC (Carl Black)
  Re: MySQL, chroot and shared libs (David Schwartz)
  Re: ipx question (Valentin Abramov)
  Re: Dhcp and pump problem (Bret)
  Re: Router running NAT (Lew Pitcher)
  Re: Testing hubs with multiport NICs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Peculiar slow Internet connections... ("David")
  how to set up a bridge between 2 networks?
  Re: can't dial up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Ray McLaughlin)
  Sendmail always connects to DNS Server (Sven =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E4rz?=)
  Re: Please help me out to set the fetchmail in linux (Guardian)
  Re: Domain name for private subnet (Matthew King)
  Re: Socks 5 proxy server on certain ports only (Guardian)
  NIS ypbind problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Dialing into a linux box. ("Ferdinand V. Mendoza")
  Re: Browsers and Linux (John Hasler)
  Re: connect Win98 to Linux via serial ports ? ("David")
  Socks5 and Communicator 4.61 (Guardian)
  Re: Slip Overruns (Rob van der Putten)
  Re: Domain name for private subnet (Michael McConnell)
  Re: FrontPage Extensions ("Peter Marks")
  Re: Rename the server ("Steve Cowles")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
From: Richard Townsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Domain name for private subnet
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:20:41 GMT


Hi!

I've recently installed Redhat 6.0 on my PC. However, I am experiencing a
couple of problems with networking - in particular, setting up the domain
name for my machine.

My machine is on a private ethernet network (currently consisting of only
two machines), with an address 192.168.0.1 and netmask 255.255.255.0. It
also has a ppp dial-up connection for accessing the internet proper. When
I installed RH6.0, I set up the domain name as empty, and the hostname as
*just* the host portion, rather than a proper full-qualified name (since I
was using an "empty" domain name).

My rationale behind this was that I didn't want to accidentally chose a
"ficticious" domain name which was the same as a registered name, since
this would cause me problems when doing DNS lookups down the ppp link.

However, this has created a problem whereby my machine stops for a minute
during boot-up (when the networking stuff is being started up). I traced
this to sendmail, which when examining the machine hostname had problems
trying to determine the (absent) domain name, and went to sleep for a
minute.

How should I get around the problem? I can see a couple of possible
solutions:

1) Don't run sendmail :)
2) Choose a ficticious domain name, hoping it won't ever be actually
registered

However, both of these are kinda poor options.

At a fundamental level, this whole problem is about having concurrent name
servers for a private network and the internet, without them clashing.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what the best solution is?

Many thanks,

Rich Townsend

PS I know this is a bit of a "bad" request, but I would appreciate it if
any reply could be cc'd to my email address, since my news server tends to
drop messages at random, and in the past I've missed helpfull replies....




------------------------------

From: Raymond Hendrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Serious Problem, Help me...
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:27:41 -0500

Blacka wrote:
> 
> Ok, I have a Pent 90 with an ISA bus. It has 2 PCI slots. Is it possible to
> connect a 32-bit PCI card to this computer since it has an ISA bus type? The
> network card said PCI bus type, its the netgear FA310Tx.
> 
> Thanks

Hello,

  If the motherboard has two PCI slots, then it is possible to put a PCI
card in it (actually, it is possible to put two PCI cards in it).  One
thing to look out for... Are any of the slots shared?  Sometimes, an ISA
slot and a PCI slot are "shared", meaning that if one of them is used
the other cannot be.  I do not know why they make them that way, but
they do.

Hoping that this helps,

RayH    :-)


"The opinions expressed are mine, not my employer's or my client's."

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Raymond C. Hendrey (Consultant)   Phone: (847) 538-4218             | 
| Motorola, Inc.                    Fax:   (847) 538-4315             |
| Private Network Management        Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Mailstop: IL02/RM1055C            X400: [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------

From: "Niel Dunnage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux.mandrake,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: big problems with network card - please help!
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:16:28 +0100

I'm getting simialr problems with a 3c509. I'm sure the problem is I/O
related. I'm now getting an error delaying eth0 initialisation at boot.
Which is the configration file I need to ammend to get the card to function
rarther than using linuxconf

Travis Hysuick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:VVaE3.2053$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Okay fellas, here's the situation:
> I just installed Mandrake 6.0 on my system. The network card is a
> 3Com900B-TPO (Etherlink XL). Everytime I boot up Linux, the
> "initializing eth0" always fails. I have absolutely no idea what I should
> do, I just started using Linux about 2 weeks ago, so I'm very green to the
> whole Linux scene. I tried using Linuxconf and netcfg, but nothing seems
to
> work. I'm on a cable modem through Shaw@home, which works fine under
> Windows. I'm very frustrated over this whole thing, so if anyone has any
> good ideas on how to get this card working, please e-mail me at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. --> "Try recompiling your kernel" is not considered a good idea since
I
> haven't the slightest clue how to do it, please remember I'm a newbie in
the
> extremest sense of the word. Thanks in advance guys!!
>
>
>
>
>



------------------------------

From: "dan Grass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux networking
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:25:53 GMT

NT is easier to maintain if you do not have any network knowledge. But if
your reasons for doing this is to learn networking than I would recommend
linux because if you can do it in linux you will have no problem doing it in
NT. plus Linux is more stable than NT. It sounds like you have the resources
(people) to answer questions. Look for books that answer questions in a
manner that you understand than look for other books by the same authors.


"Student" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7rr6lo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> i'm a university student and i live in a hostel...recently,
> i'm participating in a project that requires my group to make a network
> in the hostel. The hardware, including the network, is ready for
> use. but we are deciding whether using NT or linux is better...
> we have the following targets in our project..
> 1) each user has some space in the server HD
> 2)they can print by using the hostel's printer but with quota
> is NT or Linux is better? which one is easier to maintain?
> we have some ppl that knows NT and Linux, and we want to
> learn more in networking by reading books...can anyone give us some
> suggestion on that?
>
>



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dustin Puryear)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: AutoPPP and assigning ip numbers based on port!
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:41:08 GMT

On Thu, 16 Sep 1999 17:38:45 GMT, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Dustin Puryear writes:
>> Okay, the million dollar question is.. how do I have AutoPPP use the
>> appropriate options file?
>
>Just create the appropriate options.ttySX files.  Pppd knows what serial
>port it is connected to and will read the correct one.

That's it.

---
Dustin Puryear
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Vilmos Soti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS error: unknown function nfssvc
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:19:02 GMT

Frank Loewenthal wrote:
> 
> Hi folks
> 
> I try to install NFS on a Redhat 6.0 with Kernel 2.2.12. I can not start the
> nfs - daemon. I got allways the error message:
> nfssvc: Function not implemented

Hi,

I could solve the folloving problem by compiling the nfs part right into
the kernel and not as a module.

Vilmos

------------------------------

From: "Blacka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie linux installation via NFS
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:09:50 -0700

Ok, I just bought a Pentium 90 with the intent of installing linux on it. I
am trying to learn linux on this box. It doesnt have a cd rom however, but
it has a network card. I was planning installing it via NFS, using my other
machine which has a cdrom drive. Problem :The network card won't load in DOS
(it's running a slim version of DOS 6.22).

My question is : Since DOS won't load the driver, when I try installing
Linux via NFS, will linux recognise the Network card and start the
installation or will it fail?? The network card works fine, its just that
the driver won't load in DOS.

Thanks Much
Orrin Jolly





------------------------------

From: Carl Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to emulating network on single PC
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 22:19:39 +1200

Try running "netconfig", and setting your IP address as 127.0.0.1
that will let you use loopback mode

Tao Yang wrote:
> 
> Hi, guys
> 
> I am a newbie of Linux, now I just install a RH6 on my PC,
> but I want to try some network stuff under Linux, is there
> anything like "soft networkcard" ( I ever use such thing to
> cheat NT it is on a LAN). Or do I have other choice?
> 
> Thanks lot.
> 
> Tao

------------------------------

From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: MySQL, chroot and shared libs
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 03:20:54 -0700


Sean O'Dell wrote:
> 
> Well, your suggestion actually lead me to the actual problem I think.  I
> tried using the domain name for the mysql server and got pretty much the
> same results.  However, when I tried the plain old IP address, it worked
> just fine.  So, it's got something to do with my DNS lookup activities
> somewhere.  Gonna track that down...thanks for the info!
> 
>     -Sean

        I bet your chroot environment was missing stuff like /etc/nsswitch.conf
and /lib/libnss_*

        Believe it or not, even statically linked glibc programs need the nss
libs.

        DS

------------------------------

Subject: Re: ipx question
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Valentin Abramov)
Date: 17 Sep 1999 10:08:35 GMT

In article <%2gE3.415$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>I am trying to get ipx to work with pppd. In the /etc/ppp/options file, Iput
>these three lines in:
>ipxcp-accept-network
>ipxcp-accept-remote
>ipxcp-accept-local
>
>After I log in using pppd, I look at the connection log, and it has an entry
>that states 802.2 is not supoorted. I know ipx is getting loaded on my end.
>Any ideas, why I get this?
>
>John
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


Take a look to

http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux/index.shtml

There is page about IPX over PPP. Hope it helps.


Valentin Abramov




------------------------------

From: Bret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dhcp and pump problem
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:37:32 -0400

Brian Evans wrote:
> 
> I configure dhcpcd to replace Pump, since I had problems with it.
> dhcpcd-1.xxx is included in rpm format on the Redhat 6.0 cd, and was a snap
> to install.
> 
> Brian

I have two questions concerning that:  Why would you run a dhcp server
when all you need is a client, and then how do you get pump to not run? 
I assume you have to hack the ifup script?

Bret

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Router running NAT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:36:53 GMT

On Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:17:46 -0500, "Kevin Moseley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Is there a way to make linux run as a router running NAT and forwarding all
>packets. All I want it to do is address translation.

Yes, there is a way to do this.

First, you have to enable IP forwarding and IP Masquarading in your kernel.
This is usually done by altering the kernel source configuration files and
recompiling your kernel. I'd suggest that you read the "Linux Kernel Howto"
before attempting this. You should also read the "Linux IP Masquerade
mini-Howto" to get the proper parameters, and a better understanding of Linux
NAT.

Second, acquire and install the ipfwadm (for Linux 2.0 kernels) or the ipchains
(for Linux 2.1 and better kernels) tools from xos.nl . These tools allow you to
configure your IP masquerading rules (which are part of the IP Firewall
implementation, another howto, I'm afraid - the "Firewalling and Proxy Server
Howto").

Third, configure your masquerade rules (the above Howto docs have the
instructions, as does the xos.nl website).

And you are off to the races.

Good luck


>
>Thanks,
>
>Kevin
>
>

Lew Pitcher
System Consultant
Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group

(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employers')

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Testing hubs with multiport NICs
Date: 17 Sep 1999 09:24:38 GMT

AFAIK, this is impossible since the kernel sends stuff to local adresses
through the loopback device so that it doesn't have to access any hardware.


------------------------------

From: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peculiar slow Internet connections...
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:57:35 +0200

you probably have your mouse and modem on com1 and com3 or com2 and com4.
com1 and com3 share the same interrupt as do com2 and com4. so use
combination of com1 and com2, com1 and com4, com2 and com3.  i.e. combos of
odd and even :)

theres also a way to change the interrupts i believe. dunno this from the
top of my head..

hope this gets you started.......

good luck
david

>
>First of all, has anyone had a similar problem with slow download speeds
>that they got resolved (i.e. any insights, suggestions ot tips)?
>
>Secondly, what is the deal with wiggling the mouse?  Why does that
>consistently produce higher download speeds?  (It honestly does help it
>go faster - sometimes, it remains stalled until I move the mouse!)  Has
>anyone else seen anything like this?  Please be kind if it is something
>obvious.
>
>Thanks for any help I can get.
>
>Tony Hammond
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to set up a bridge between 2 networks?
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:31:27 GMT

my linux is between 2 windows networks. i want to set up my linux as a 
bridge. how am i going to do this?

==================  Posted via CNET Linux Help  ==================
                    http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Ray McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: can't dial up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 03:27:02 -0500

I only got kppp to work only after setting up several scripts per my
ISP's instructions. This was aggrevated by several factors, most of
which were the fault of my ISP. But I got it to work. Have you checked
your ISP for support pages on connecting with linux?
If you find no help there I can send you copys of my scripts if that
might help.

Regards Ray

exploser wrote:
> 
> I 've tried Kppp,but failed too!!!!
> And how can i install ppp???
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Have you installed ppp during installation - by the way, why don't you
> > use kppp?
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards - Peter
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >

------------------------------

From: Sven =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E4rz?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sendmail always connects to DNS Server
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:00:41 +0200

Hello, 

I have the problem that every time I try to send a mail with SMTP Linux
tries to connect to the DNS server, although I have set
SENDMAIL_EXAPNSIVE=yes.

How can I force the system not to look up the domain name over the email
?

Thank you 

Sven M�rz

------------------------------

From: Guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Please help me out to set the fetchmail in linux
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:58:25 -0400

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Hi experts...
> 
> I would like to know, how to set fetchmail in linux at the same time
> how to set linux as a proxy for inertnet.
> Or
> 
> Any one can suggest me a best book on linux and fetchmail
> Configuration, which will solve my problem.
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> Regards....
> 
> Paresh
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.


guardian:13$ grep -i fetchmail /etc/ppp/ip-up
# If you want fetchmail to get your mail when you connect
fetchmail -t 30 -d 900     

-- 

Guardian


----==-- _                     / /  \
---==---(_)__  __ ____  __    / / /\ \
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   / /_/\ \ \
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\  /______\ \ \
A proud member of TeamLinux \_________\/

------------------------------

From: Matthew King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Domain name for private subnet
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:47:05 +0100

Richard Townsend wrote:
> 
> How should I get around the problem? I can see a couple of possible
> solutions:
> 
> 1) Don't run sendmail :)
> 2) Choose a ficticious domain name, hoping it won't ever be actually
> registered
> 

I personally chose (2), using a domain .ltd (limited) which is
fictitiuos. Perhaps something which is likely to always be fictitious
would have been a better idea (like twne, this-will-never-exist) or even
add some random numbers. It certainly works.

Suddenly it comes to me that you could probably use localhost
(machine1.localhost and machine2.localhost for example). I know this is
a default somewhere.

However, I don't think sendmail actually needs a domain name and can
somehow be set up to not require one. No idea how, though.

Matthew "TheNut" King

------------------------------

From: Guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: Socks 5 proxy server on certain ports only
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:54:12 -0400

Matt wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I use IP masquerading with a packet filtering firewall to route my LAN's net
> access through my RH6 box.  Everything but a few things work fine.  I've
> tried to get these last few things working without much success.  Most of
> these apps have socks 5 support.  What I'd like to do is install some type
> of socks server to proxy just for these programs, or just the ports they use
> if that is possible.  Is there a way to do this.


Sorry, I didn't get socks5 to work like I wanted it to...  However, you
may want to use fastforward.  It's great for forking the mail to an
internal mail server and so forth.


-- 

Guardian


----==-- _                     / /  \
---==---(_)__  __ ____  __    / / /\ \
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   / /_/\ \ \
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\  /______\ \ \
A proud member of TeamLinux \_________\/

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NIS ypbind problems
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:48:42 GMT

Hi,

I'm trying to set up NIS on a small network of Red Hat 6 linux boxes.

I (think) I've set up ypserv successfully (according to the instructions
that came with it, and NIS_HOWTO).

Then, when I try to get the client software going, I get errors. I
downloaded yp-bind 3.3 and yp-tools 2.3, compiled and installed
successfully. etc etc etc.

When I try a ypcat, I get this message:

YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound
No such map passwd.byname. Reason: Can't bind to server which serves
this domain

Now, i'm wondering if it might have something to do with:

[root@nameless yp]# rpcinfo -p localhost
   program vers proto   port
    100000    2   tcp    111  rpcbind
    100000    2   udp    111  rpcbind
    100024    1   udp    608  status
    100024    1   tcp    610  status
    100011    1   udp    619  rquotad
    100011    2   udp    619  rquotad
    100005    1   udp    629  mountd
    100005    1   tcp    631  mountd
    100005    2   udp    634  mountd
    100005    2   tcp    636  mountd
    100005    3   udp    639  mountd
    100005    3   tcp    641  mountd
    100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
    100021    1   udp   1026  nlockmgr
    100021    3   udp   1026  nlockmgr
    100021    1   tcp   1024  nlockmgr
    100021    3   tcp   1024  nlockmgr
    100004    2   udp   1032  ypserv
    100004    1   udp   1032  ypserv
    100004    2   tcp   1062  ypserv
    100004    1   tcp   1062  ypserv
    100007    2   udp    692  ypbind
    100007    2   tcp    694  ypbind

The ports for various yp type services are different to those shown.

Please help - I'm very confused. I've probably not given you enough
information to sort the problem out. So please let me know what you
need, and i'll post it.

Jon


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: "Ferdinand V. Mendoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dialing into a linux box.
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 15:01:43 +0400

Try http://www.linuxgazette.com

Look for the January/Febrauary  edition of this year and
search for an article by Hassan Ali. It may help you.

Ferdinand


Simon Chambers wrote:

> Here's my problem, I want people to be able to dial into my machine, and
> access it remotely via modem, unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a
> readily available daemon which is well documented that allows me to do so.
>
> If anybody could help me find a daemon, preferably in tarball format, but
> not essential.
>
> Many thanks




------------------------------

From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 03:30:34 GMT

Dylan Thurston writes:
> While I also use gnus, and wouldn't consider reading news with
> netscape...  Does it really make all that much more sense to read news
> with a text editor rather than a Web browser?

Yes.  News is text.
-- 
John Hasler                This posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]            Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill         Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin         Do not send email advertisements to this address.

------------------------------

From: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: connect Win98 to Linux via serial ports ?
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:21:57 +0200

hi,

i did it a while ago, and it works perfectly.... check out

http://www.mindspring.com/~kewells/net/

download the null modem driver here. use it with dailup networking over the
null modem. then read the ppp-howto and net3 howto.  i believe net3 howto
had the most useful info somewhere at the bottom of the doc.

its farely simple. believe you need to run pppd -detach defaultroute
$localip:remoteip <speed> <port>  on your linux machine. on your windows
machine set your linux as gateway, choose the right IP, etc.. the usual.
But do read the docs :) its been awhile since i did this..

i use agetty to have my windows dailup log into the linux machine and from
there i start pppd. i'm sure you can have agetty fire up pppd for you tho.
you can also leave out the username/password etc.. its all in the agetty
manual.

good luck,
David


Eric Trimmer wrote in message ...
>I used to have my Win3.1 machine connected to my Linux server through
>parallel ports (PLIP). This gave my Win3.1 machine full access to
>the Internet. BUT; I've since upgraded to Win98 and PLIP only works
>in a DOS window and only with DOS programs and not with any Windows
>programs.
>
>Is it possible to connect Win98 to Linux using serial ports; meaning
>no modems are involved ?
>
>If so may someone point me in the proper direction as to how to do this.
>All the documention I've read assumes that modems will be involved. :(
>
>Thanks,
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Eric Trimmer                       email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Remember: If vegetarians eat vegetables;
>          beware of humanitarians !!
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>



------------------------------

From: Guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Socks5 and Communicator 4.61
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 07:17:12 -0400


How do I socksify netscape.  When I run runsocks netscape, it segfaults.

The very short README file that came with socks5 says that the program
must be statically linked to the socks lib or you have to do the above;
also, said that all socks5 options should be supported.  I don't get it
cause netscape has a place to enter the proxy address in preferences? 
Do I need to diable Netscapes dns resolver?  Is the pay for version of
socks that netscape sells the same?  Their's comes with  a java config
utility.




-- 

Guardian


----==-- _                     / /  \
---==---(_)__  __ ____  __    / / /\ \
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   / /_/\ \ \
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\  /______\ \ \
A proud member of TeamLinux \_________\/

------------------------------

From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Slip Overruns
Date: 17 Sep 1999 13:14:15 +0200

Hi there


Rainer Canavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Now if i run ifconfig sl0, there's an alarming rate of TX and
> RX overruns, and i just can't believe that.

Did you check your flow control (should be bidirectional RTS / CTS flow
control)?
Do you use 16550's or older com port chips?


Regards,
Rob

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                Rob van der Putten, [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |
|              http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html               |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------

From: Michael McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Domain name for private subnet
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:05:07 +0100

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Matthew King wrote:

> Richard Townsend wrote:
> > 
> > How should I get around the problem? I can see a couple of possible
> > solutions:
> > 
> > 1) Don't run sendmail :)
> > 2) Choose a ficticious domain name, hoping it won't ever be actually
> > registered
> > 
> 
> I personally chose (2), using a domain .ltd (limited) which is
> fictitiuos. Perhaps something which is likely to always be fictitious
> would have been a better idea (like twne, this-will-never-exist) or even
> add some random numbers. It certainly works.

I tend to use .lan (local area network) which is also fictitious. Personally,
I believe it would make a lot of sense if .lan was officially reserved for
local private networks.

-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
Eridani Star System  --  The Most Up-to-Date Red Hat Linux CDROMs Available
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://linux.amush.cx       Fax: +44-8701-600807
                Eridani: Your PC doesn't need Windows or Gates.


------------------------------

From: "Peter Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FrontPage Extensions
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:24:57 +1000


CJUNKY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is it possible to have FrontPage Extensions on an Apache web server?

yep.

The extensions that need to be installed are available from
ftp.microsoft.com. The file is fp30.linux.tar.Z, untar with tar xZf
fp30.linux.tar.Z then:

# frontpage/version3.0/fp_install.sh

I've tried the version 4 extensions but couldn't get it going. V3 works just
fine for me.

peter



------------------------------

From: "Steve Cowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Rename the server
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:37:59 GMT

Since you did not mention your linux distribution, I can only offer help with Redhat 
based
systems. In order to "properly" change the host/domain name on a linux box (one that 
will
live through a reboot) you need to edit the file /etc/sysconfig/network. Simply using 
the
hostname/dominname commands without editing this file will NOT leave your name changes 
in
effect through a reboot. Although, using these commands answers one of your questions
(changing a name without rebooting). You will also need to edit your /etc/hosts file to
match your changes.

To illustrate what happens when a Redhat based linux system comes up, I have 
<cut/pasted>
the relevent parts of /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit which addresses your question, if (and only 
if)
your interested in having these changes "live" through a reboot.

Steve Cowles
SWCowles at gte dot net

<cut/paste of my /etc/sysconfig/network>
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=yes
HOSTNAME=voyager.mydomain.net
DOMAINNAME=mydomain.net
GATEWAY=0.0.0.0
GATEWAYDEV=eth0

<cut/paste from /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit>
# Read in config data.
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/network ]; then
    . /etc/sysconfig/network
else
    NETWORKING=no
    HOSTNAME=localhost
fi

# Set the hostname.
action "Setting hostname ${HOSTNAME}" hostname ${HOSTNAME}

# Set the NIS domain name
if [ -n "$NISDOMAIN" ]; then
    action "Setting NIS domain name $NISDOMAIN" domainname $NISDOMAIN
else
    domainname ""
fi




Michael Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How do you rename an existing Linux server?  I have been searching for
> information on this, but cannot seem to find any.  I would like to rename
> the server (hostname and domain name) on an existing server.  Is there an
> easy way to do this without rebooting?
>
> Thanks,
> Michael Lundberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ------------------  Posted via CNET Linux Help  ------------------
>                     http://www.searchlinux.com



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to