> b) Write an asycnhrounous system with only 2 or three threads where I manage the >connections and stack (via setcontext swapcontext etc), which is progromatically a >little harder > > Which way will yeild me better performance, considerng both approaches are >implemented optimally?
If this is a serious question, an async system will by definition do better. You have either 700 stacks screwing up the data cache or 2-3 stacks nicely fitting in the data cache. Ditto for instruction cache, etc. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
