On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 09:08, James Miller (office) wrote: > I understand that in the world of Linux network security, generally older > = worser (more insecure). So, I see that Freesco, a small Linux > gateway/router distro that seems to be actively maintained, is using a > kernel from the 2.0.x line - 2.0.38 (I understand that the most > recent 2.0.x kernel is 2.0.39). Is Freesco considered an insecure > gateway/router distro because it uses this older kernel line, or can it be > expected to provide adequate network security? What would be the risks > involved in using such a distro? Would the security savants on this list > recommend against using it? > > Thanks, James > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
I like routerlinux. And it appears to still be actively maintained. http://www.routerlinux.com/ -- Owen Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
