On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Jim Nelson wrote: > If you are using a 2.6 kernel (and maybe the 2.4), the kernel module for > the ATI Rage series of graphics systems is aty128fb, not atyfb. I've > had problems with vesafb myself, but with really old hardware (Trident > TGUI 9660 on an old Thinkpad).
Thanks for your response, Jim. Not sure if you recall what sort of card I mentioned, but it's an older, onboard one with low memory. According to an infomrational page I found at www.sharplabs.com:8668/space/video+boot+arguments , I should be using the atyfb module (and they do list the aty128fb there for other ATI Rage models). So, do you still think I"m using the wrong module? I really don't know. I consider myself a total neophyte at this > If you are always going to use the framebuffer, go ahead and compile it > into the kernel. Saves a bit of trouble, and if you don't need modules > to load for accessing any of the devices necessary for reaching the init > scripts, you can probably dump the initrd altogether. It's crucial on > distro-provided kernels, since they have to support a broad array of > equipment, but if this is a one-off kernel for your own personal > equipment, and you don't need modules (i. e. nforce drivers from Nvidia, > etc.) to access the boot disk, an initrd is not necessary. None of my > systems use them. Yes, I have in mind to compile myself a kernel at some point. Just trying to defer it until I have some more basic problems solved. But they seem to appear at least as fast as I can solve them :). James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
