According to Norbert Bottlaender-Prier: While burning my CPU.
> 
> Jakob Borg a �crit:
> >...
> > Is this some cache problem?
> > 
> > --
> > Jakob Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 narayan 2.1.112 i586]
> 
> Hi Jakob !
> 
> There's some probability that the problem is in your signature ;-)
> 
> I suggest you try if this happens with a Kernel of the 2.0.xx series...
> It looks like you're Alpha-testing right now, so you have to be ready to
> encounter problems...

How very well put. I have just been reading some mails about 2.1.10x which
would suggest that what you say might be his problem. As a warning or
advise to others, 2.1.xxx kernels are "Development kernels", its what they
call "The Bleeding Edge" use them at your own risk, if you encounter "ANY"
problem try a stable kernel for example (2.0.35) before sending a message
to "any" list about the problem which you have encounterd.
But of course if a "Development kernel" has corrupted your disk then the
damage "might" be unrepairable, that does'nt happen very often but it has
been known to occur.


> -- 
> 
>    *   *
>     \ /
>  *-- * --*
>     / \    This was TMTM (The Megabyte Text Magician)
>    /   *   ------------------------------------------
>   /                     [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  /              http://www.globenet.org/periph
> /
> 
> -"Since I have dual boot, Win95 has become much more stable"
> -"That's what YOU think. In reality since, sometimes you happen to
>   shutdown Lose95 before the GPF does it for you..."
> 


-- 
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to